[docbook-apps] DocBook Website / the navigational ToC / internal vs. external links
There is no obvious or enforced difference there regarding internal vs. external links. I would like to see some kind of accepted or common use of how to mark up in whatever way *external* links. It does make a difference, whether to stay within that navigation system or to leave it through an external link. Any best practices? J. -- As nice as you guys here are, pls usually *only* reply to my post right on this mailing list. I honestly do follow this list. Of course, if you want to tell me, how silly I am, then let's keep that private ;-) but usually it's only my Bad Simple English, not my ideas. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
Re: [docbook-apps] chunking with xhtml-1_1 produce invalid xhtml11?
Jirka, thanks for your reply. You are right, but: On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Jirka Kosek ji...@kosek.cz wrote: DocBook has much more complex structures which can be nested and can't be directly mapped to valid XHTML. Handling this on stylesheet level would be to complex, so running HTML Tidy on output of DocBook stylesheets makes sense in this situations. I need to have footnotes in table titles (that's why I usecaptionpara) and figures in table cells (that's why I use tdpara) and there should be a mean to have them both valid in docbook and xhtml11 output (I need xhtml11 because I am targeting IDPF epub content). Anyone has some suggestions (apart from postprocessing the html files)? TIA, __peppo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
Re: [docbook-apps] chunking with xhtml-1_1 produce invalid xhtml11?
Giuseppe Bonelli wrote: I need to have footnotes in table titles (that's why I usecaptionpara) Well then you have to customize stylesheets to not emit excessive p in HTML output. and figures in table cells (that's why I use tdpara) In table cell you can directly use inlinemediaobject without any surrounding elements. Jirka -- -- Jirka Kosek e-mail: ji...@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz -- Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing -- OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member -- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [docbook-apps] chunking or splitting for non-html files
gpev...@aol.com wrote: Thanks for the tip. I read something in an XML forum that this was not possible with the current XSL, except in certain parsers like Saxon, Xerxes, using the xsl:document or even the redirect:. But I had no luck getting either to do what I wanted. I would think that this is not that difficult after all it is essentially what we are doing with chunk xsl. Code which I have provided is writtent in XSLT 2.0. You need XSLT 2.0 processor like Saxon9 from http://saxon.sf.net There is also nice GUI for Saxon invocation if you don't like dealing with command-line: http://kernowforsaxon.sourceforge.net/ -- -- Jirka Kosek e-mail: ji...@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz -- Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing -- OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member -- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[docbook-apps] footnotes in tables (docbook 4.5 and 1.75.2 stylesheets)
Hi again, in the stock docbook xslt (1.75.2) I see under xhtml/footnote.xsl (and in xhtml-1_1/footnote.xsl as well) that the test to discriminate body text footnotes and table footnotes is done on ancestor::tgroup nodes, which imply support only for CALS tables. Does exists a patch or does this simply means that html table model is not fully supported (I am usinc docbook 4.5) and is better to stick to CALS? Thanks, __peppo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
Re: [docbook-apps] chunking or splitting for non-html files
Jirka:
Thank you for your very helpful response. I am copying to the mail list as
well, I was trying to be considerate and not spam the list.
I made couple minor changes to the code, so that I can get the declaration in
the output files, and got it to work well enough.
xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform; version=2.0
!--
A style sheet to split out main doc into several smaller docs
--
!-- --
xsl:output method=xml doctype-public=-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN
doctype-system=http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/docbookx.dtd;
indent=yes omit-xml-declaration=no/
xsl:template match=node()|@*
xsl:copy
xsl:apply-templates select=node()|@*/
/xsl:copy
/xsl:template
xsl:template match=article
xsl:variable name=filename
xsl:number count=article/
/xsl:variable
xi:include href={$filename}.xml
xmlns:xi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude/
xsl:result-document href=Art-{$filename}.xml
xsl:next-match/
/xsl:result-document
/xsl:template
/xsl:stylesheet
However I am running into an issue when I use this following stylesheet to
sections and have a nested section
it errors saying it cannot write out to same URI.
Here is the Style Sheet
xsl:template match=node()|@*
xsl:copy
xsl:apply-templates select=node()|@*/
/xsl:copy
/xsl:template
xsl:template match=section
xsl:variable name=filename
xsl:number count=section/
/xsl:variable
xi:include href={$filename}.xml
xmlns:xi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude/
xsl:result-document href=Sect-{$filename}.xml
xsl:next-match/
/xsl:result-document
/xsl:template
/xsl:stylesheet
Here is a sample of the XML data
section
title
emphasis role=boldDATA indexterm significance=normal
primaryDATA /primary
/indexterm
/emphasis
/title
section
titleSubData/title
parablah blah blah/para
/section
section
titleNEXT DATAindexterm significance=normal
primaryNEXT DATA/primary
/indexterm
/title
paraNext Set of Data Blah blah blah/para
programlisting format=linespecific
INTEGER value 10
INTEGER value 11
INTEGER value 12
/programlisting
/section
/section
How would you propose to modify the XSLT to handle the nested sections?
I tried to change the xsl:number to an xsl:select where it could name the
result files as section/titles
but that was not successful.
How would you handle that? Was I on the right track with the xsl:select?
Thank you for your help!
/G.
-Original Message-
From: Jirka Kosek ji...@kosek.cz
To: docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 22, 2010 9:54 am
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] chunking or splitting for non-html files
gpev...@aol.com wrote:
Just to clarify this then is something that cant be done with XSLT 1.0?
Yes, it can be done, but you have to use proprietary extensions like
axon:output or exsl:document. That's why I have used standard XSLT 2.0.
Thank you once again for your help with this, like I said I am a newbie with
SLT.
It is greatly appreciated.
Please keep thread on mailing list by using Reply All so other users
an benefit from mailing list archive.
--
-
Jirka Kosek e-mail: ji...@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz
-
Professional XML consulting and training services
DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
-
OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
-
RE: [docbook-apps] chunking or splitting for non-html files
| -Original Message-
| From: gpev...@aol.com
|
| However I am running into an issue when I use this following
| stylesheet to sections and have a nested section
| it errors saying it cannot write out to same URI.
|
| Here is the Style Sheet
|
| xsl:template match=node()|@*
|xsl:copy
| xsl:apply-templates select=node()|@*/
|/xsl:copy
| /xsl:template
| xsl:template match=section
|xsl:variable name=filename
| xsl:number count=section/
|/xsl:variable
|xi:include href={$filename}.xml
| xmlns:xi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude/
|xsl:result-document href=Sect-{$filename}.xml
| xsl:next-match/
|/xsl:result-document
| /xsl:template
Try changing xsl:number count=section to
xsl:number count=section level=multiple/
Or perhaps you'll prefer
xsl:number count=section level=any/
Mauritz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
Re: [docbook-apps] chunking or splitting for non-html files
Mauritz:
Yes that works great, and yes i do prefer level=any option!
I like the way that works better!
Thank you very much!
/G.
-Original Message-
From: Mauritz Jeanson m...@johanneberg.com
To: gpev...@aol.com; ji...@kosek.cz; docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 22, 2010 12:05 pm
Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] chunking or splitting for non-html files
| -Original Message-
From: gpev...@aol.com
However I am running into an issue when I use this following
stylesheet to sections and have a nested section
it errors saying it cannot write out to same URI.
Here is the Style Sheet
xsl:template match=node()|@*
xsl:copy
xsl:apply-templates select=node()|@*/
/xsl:copy
/xsl:template
xsl:template match=section
xsl:variable name=filename
xsl:number count=section/
/xsl:variable
xi:include href={$filename}.xml
xmlns:xi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude/
xsl:result-document href=Sect-{$filename}.xml
xsl:next-match/
/xsl:result-document
/xsl:template
ry changing xsl:number count=section to
xsl:number count=section level=multiple/
Or perhaps you'll prefer
xsl:number count=section level=any/
Mauritz
-
o unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
or additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
Re: [docbook-apps] footnotes in tables (docbook 4.5 and 1.75.2 stylesheets)
Indeed, your analysis appears to be correct that HTML tables do not handle footnotes as table footnotes. They should still appear, but just as ordinary footnotes. I would classify this as a bug that needs fixing. Can you file a bug report on the DocBook SourceForge site? Thanks. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises b...@sagehill.net - Original Message - From: Giuseppe Bonelli peppo.bone...@gmail.com To: apps docbook docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 7:27 AM Subject: [docbook-apps] footnotes in tables (docbook 4.5 and 1.75.2 stylesheets) Hi again, in the stock docbook xslt (1.75.2) I see under xhtml/footnote.xsl (and in xhtml-1_1/footnote.xsl as well) that the test to discriminate body text footnotes and table footnotes is done on ancestor::tgroup nodes, which imply support only for CALS tables. Does exists a patch or does this simply means that html table model is not fully supported (I am usinc docbook 4.5) and is better to stick to CALS? Thanks, __peppo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
[docbook-apps] elements inside remark
According to the documentation on DB 5 (http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/remark.html), it appears that a large number of inline elements ought to be able to appear inside a remark element. However, the docbook.rng (http://www.docbook.org/xml/5.0b9/rng/docbook.rng) appears to allow only a few of these: inlinemediaobject, remark, superscript, subscript, xref, link, olink, anchor, biblioref, alt, annotation, indexterm.singular, indexterm.startofrange, indexterm.endofrange, phrase, replaceable Missing from this list afaict are many of the gui inlines, markup inlines, operating system inlines, etc. that the documentation says should be allowed (and which I believe DocBook 4.5 allowed). Perhaps this is intentional; there are some comments at http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/specs/docbook-5.0b6-spec-wd-01.html to the effect that DB5 drastically reduced the content models of many inlines. This description uses the command element as an example, and this content model seems to correspond to the DB5 schema. Again, this differs from the documentation at http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/command.html. So maybe this is a case of the documentation at http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/command.html (etc.) not having caught up with the schema? Or maybe http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/ is not the definitive documentation for DB5, because it's v1.1 of the documentation, and for now 1.0 is what I should be using? So maybe my question boils down to this: Where can I find both the current and consistent schema and human-readable documentation for DB5? Mike Maxwell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
Re: [docbook-apps] linkend attr required in biblioref?
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:25:48 +0200, Markus Hoenicka markus.hoeni...@mhoenicka.de wrote: maxwell maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu was heard to say: Perhaps this XML frag is supposed to be citationbiblioref linkend=Chomsky1965 begin=23 end=25//citation I can't comment on the innards of the RNG schema regarding the biblioref element, but as one of those who originally suggested the biblioref element I'd like to confirm that the above usage is what we had in mind. Thanks, after playing around I see that this works well--in fact, I don't need the citation element (which I showed above wrapping the biblioref element) at all. Much cleaner! I think the 'xrefstyle' attribute on biblioref is supposed to be used for things like where the parens go, or whether things are parenthesized, etc. I suppose it's too much to ask that this could be standardized in DocBook, perhaps along the lines of the LaTeX 'natbib' package--probably there's just too much variability. If only everyone did things like me! Mike Maxwell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
