[Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
Hi, beta4 built under RHEL4, RHEL5 and RHEL6 (the latter being the public beta). beta5 now builds only for RHEL5, the other two fail with: strnum.c: In function `str_to_llong': strnum.c:139: error: `LLONG_MIN' undeclared (first use in this function) strnum.c:139: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once strnum.c:139: error: for each function it appears in.) Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpgURLdHC3es.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
On 05/30/2010 09:05 AM Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, beta4 built under RHEL4, RHEL5 and RHEL6 (the latter being the public beta). beta5 now builds only for RHEL5, the other two fail with: strnum.c: In function `str_to_llong': strnum.c:139: error: `LLONG_MIN' undeclared (first use in this function) strnum.c:139: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once strnum.c:139: error: for each function it appears in.) Thanks! LLONG_MIN is defined in /usr/include/limits.h (at least on my systems). It's provided by the package libc6-dev (on Debian GNU/Linux). src/lib/strnum.c - includes lib.h src/lib/lib.h- includes limits.h Defines your limits.h LLONG_MIN? If not, which libc/version is RHEL 6 using? Regards, Pascal -- The trapper recommends today: 5e1f1e55.1015...@localdomain.org
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:42:38AM +0200, Pascal Volk wrote: On 05/30/2010 09:05 AM Axel Thimm wrote: beta4 built under RHEL4, RHEL5 and RHEL6 (the latter being the public beta). beta5 now builds only for RHEL5, the other two fail with: strnum.c: In function `str_to_llong': strnum.c:139: error: `LLONG_MIN' undeclared (first use in this function) strnum.c:139: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once strnum.c:139: error: for each function it appears in.) LLONG_MIN is defined in /usr/include/limits.h (at least on my systems). It's provided by the package libc6-dev (on Debian GNU/Linux). src/lib/strnum.c - includes lib.h src/lib/lib.h- includes limits.h Defines your limits.h LLONG_MIN? If not, which libc/version is RHEL 6 using? LLONG_MIN/LLONG_MAX and some other defines are there, but protected by # ifdef __USE_ISOC99 Maybe dovecot's buildsystem should check for and use -std=c99? But then I wonder why it does build for RHEL5 and all recent Fedoras? I grepped the logs and found no explicit -std switch in any of the successful builds. Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgphnfyWmt80e.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Dovecot] dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole/ManageSieve: wrong service name
Hi Pascal,
Pascal Volk wrote:
ManageSieve uses the wrong™ service name for the authdb lookup.
With dovecot-1.2-managesieve the service name was changed from
'managesieve' to 'sieve'. So I altered my table layout in order to make
the query SELECT userid AS user, password FROM dovecotpassword('%Ln',
'%Ld') WHERE %Ls work again.
When I try to login on the sieve port 4190/tcp, I find this in my
dovecot.log:
auth: Error: pgsql: Query failed, retrying: ERROR: column managesieve
does not exist
auth: Error: LINE 1: ..., password FROM dovecotpassword('user',
'example.org') WHERE managesiev...
Hmm, you are right. It got changed implicitly by Dovecot v2.0 API
changes. I cannot fix this by myself however. In Dovecot,
client_auth_begin (src/login-common/client-common-auth.c) statically
uses login_binary.protocol as the protocol name for SASL authentication
(in v1.2 I would call the sasl API directly), so there is no way for me
to alter this to sieve because the protocol name for Dovecot is
managesieve. Timo will have to create some means to fix this. As we
have seen earlier, fully changing the protocol name from managesieve
to sieve is a bad idea, for one because it causes much confusion.
Timo, can you take a look at this?
Regards,
Stephan.
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
On 05/30/2010 09:54 AM Axel Thimm wrote: LLONG_MIN/LLONG_MAX and some other defines are there, but protected by # ifdef __USE_ISOC99 Maybe dovecot's buildsystem should check for and use -std=c99? But then I wonder why it does build for RHEL5 and all recent Fedoras? I grepped the logs and found no explicit -std switch in any of the successful builds. Wow, now I'm wondering too: limits.h:102 # ifdef __USE_ISOC99 define LLONG_MAX, LLONG_MIN, ULLONG_MAX limits.h:111 # endif /* ISO C99 */ limits.h:131 #if defined __USE_ISOC99 defined __GNUC__ ifndef LLONG_MIN, LLONG_MAX, ULLONG_MAX define theme limits.h:141 #endif Dovecot used std=gnu99, when possible configure.in:300# Use std=gnu99 if we have new enough gcc configure.in:301old_cflags=$CFLAGS configure.in:302CFLAGS=-std=gnu99 gcc(1) gnu99 GNU dialect of ISO C99. When ISO C99 is fully implemented in GCC, this will become the default. … Which gcc uses RHEL 6? It works for me with gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.4. Regards, Pascal -- The trapper recommends today: cafebabe.1015...@localdomain.org
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:41:12AM +0200, Pascal Volk wrote: On 05/30/2010 09:54 AM Axel Thimm wrote: LLONG_MIN/LLONG_MAX and some other defines are there, but protected by # ifdef __USE_ISOC99 Maybe dovecot's buildsystem should check for and use -std=c99? But then I wonder why it does build for RHEL5 and all recent Fedoras? I grepped the logs and found no explicit -std switch in any of the successful builds. Wow, now I'm wondering too: limits.h:102 # ifdef __USE_ISOC99 define LLONG_MAX, LLONG_MIN, ULLONG_MAX limits.h:111 # endif /* ISO C99 */ limits.h:131 #if defined __USE_ISOC99 defined __GNUC__ ifndef LLONG_MIN, LLONG_MAX, ULLONG_MAX define theme limits.h:141 #endif Dovecot used std=gnu99, when possible configure.in:300 # Use std=gnu99 if we have new enough gcc configure.in:301 old_cflags=$CFLAGS configure.in:302 CFLAGS=-std=gnu99 gcc(1) gnu99 GNU dialect of ISO C99. When ISO C99 is fully implemented in GCC, this will become the default. … Which gcc uses RHEL 6? It works for me with gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.4. The gcc I used are RHEL4 3.4.6fails RHEL5 4.1.2builds F114.4.1builds F124.4.3builds RHEL6 (beta1) 4.4.3fails F134.4.4builds -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpngv2pczMhX.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 02:32:49AM -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote: Axel, On 5/30/10 12:05 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: beta4 built under RHEL4, RHEL5 and RHEL6 (the latter being the public beta). beta5 now builds only for RHEL5, the other two fail with: strnum.c: In function `str_to_llong': strnum.c:139: error: `LLONG_MIN' undeclared (first use in this function) strnum.c:139: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once strnum.c:139: error: for each function it appears in.) FWIW, the build fails with the same error within my CentOS 5 Mock build environment. I'm not sure what I've got set up different than you, but I'm using a slightly tweaked version of your spec file and a pretty vanilla Mock 0.6 setup. Sorry, I mixed things up (RHEL6 beta1 is labeled as el5_89 at ATrpms). E.g. the broken builds are RHEL4 and RHEL5, and RHEL6 beta builds. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpSLQVJURGSm.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:30:48PM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote: On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:41:12AM +0200, Pascal Volk wrote: On 05/30/2010 09:54 AM Axel Thimm wrote: LLONG_MIN/LLONG_MAX and some other defines are there, but protected by # ifdef __USE_ISOC99 Maybe dovecot's buildsystem should check for and use -std=c99? But then I wonder why it does build for RHEL5 and all recent Fedoras? I grepped the logs and found no explicit -std switch in any of the successful builds. Sorry, as stated in a post just moments ago, the broken build is RHEL5, and RHEL6 works. Which gcc uses RHEL 6? It works for me with gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.4. The gcc I used are [...] OK, the proper matrix looks like: RHEL4 3.4.6fails RHEL5 4.1.2fails F114.4.1builds F124.4.3builds RHEL6 (beta1) 4.4.3builds F134.4.4builds Now it is more consistent and looks like a change between 4.1.2 and 4.4.1. Maybe in the older gcc -std=gnu99 didn't set __USE_ISOC99 and thus the missing constants were not defined? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpn4I7SFRLCS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
On 30.5.2010, at 11.39, Axel Thimm wrote: RHEL43.4.6fails RHEL54.1.2fails .. Now it is more consistent and looks like a change between 4.1.2 and 4.4.1. Maybe in the older gcc -std=gnu99 didn't set __USE_ISOC99 and thus the missing constants were not defined? Well, it compiles in CentOS 5.4..
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
On 05/30/2010 01:01 PM Timo Sirainen wrote: Well, it compiles in CentOS 5.4.. Also on CentOS release 5.5 (Final) [r...@vh1 dovecot-2.0]# ./configure configure.stdout [r...@vh1 dovecot-2.0]# make make.stdout --2010-05-30 14:53:56-- http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/UnicodeData.txt Auflösen des Rechnernamens »www.unicode.org« 69.13.187.182 Verbindungsaufbau mit www.unicode.org[69.13.187.182]:80... verbunden. HTTP-Anfrage gesendet, warte auf Antwort... 200 OK Länge: 1239519 (1,2M) [text/plain] Speichere nach: »UnicodeData.txt« 100%[…=] 1.239.519785K/s in 1,5s 2010-05-30 14:53:58 (785 KB/s) - »UnicodeData.txt« gespeichert [1239519/1239519] mail-host.c: In function »mail_hosts_add_range«: mail-host.c:65: Warnung: unbenutzter Parameter »list« [r...@vh1 dovecot-2.0]# Regards, Pascal -- The trapper recommends today: c01dcafe.1015...@localdomain.org
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
On 30.5.2010, at 12.03, Brandon Davidson wrote: If I '%define optflags -std=gnu99' in the spec it builds just fine, so I don't think it's a compiler problem. Maybe a libtool issue? Oh, the spec file overrides CFLAGS and doesn't contain -std=gnu99?
[Dovecot] Dovecot 1.2 - Quotas - Ignoring Trash folder
Hello guys,
Firstly I would like to state that I am fairly new to Dovecot. I have played
around with it in the past here and there but mainly with debian packages.
I have compiled this version of Dovecot from source, so please go easy with
me.
Ok now down to my questions:
I am having trouble getting Dovecot to 'ignore' the Trash folder when
summing up the used quota for a user.
I am running Dovecot 1.2.11 (with LDA), Postfix 2.5.5, and Postfixadmin 2.3.
I am able to send and receive emails fine. Roundcube displays the quota used
but this quota also counts what is in the users Trash can. Postfix is
configured to hand over delivering of the mail to Dovecot.
I have tried different methods from the documentation on ignoring the Trash
folder, but have not come up with anything that has worked yet.
If someone could point me in the right direction, that would be great.
I apologise now if I have not included all required information, I did read
the mailing list guidelines and believe I have follow all required steps.
charged:/usr/local/etc# dovecot --version
1.2.11
charged:/usr/local/etc#
charged:/usr/local/etc# dovecot -n
# 1.2.11: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 i686 Debian 5.0.4 ext3
base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/
log_path: /var/log/dovecot12.log
info_log_path: /var/log/dovecot12.log
protocols: imap imaps pop3 pop3s
listen: 118.127.29.214
disable_plaintext_auth: no
login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login
login_executable(default): /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
login_executable(imap): /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
login_executable(pop3): /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login
first_valid_uid: 5000
last_valid_uid: 5000
first_valid_gid: 5000
last_valid_gid: 5000
mail_privileged_group: vmail
mail_uid: 5000
mail_gid: 5000
mail_location: maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir
mail_executable(default): /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap
mail_executable(imap): /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap
mail_executable(pop3): /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/pop3
mail_plugins(default): quota imap_quota
mail_plugins(imap): quota imap_quota
mail_plugins(pop3): quota
mail_plugin_dir(default): /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap
mail_plugin_dir(imap): /usr/local/lib/dovecot/imap
mail_plugin_dir(pop3): /usr/local/lib/dovecot/pop3
namespace:
type: private
separator: .
inbox: yes
list: yes
subscriptions: yes
lda:
postmaster_address: postmas...@ignitioncarclub.com
mail_plugins: quota
mail_plugin_dir: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/lda
quota_full_tempfail: no
auth_socket_path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master
auth default:
mechanisms: plain login
passdb:
driver: sql
args: /usr/local/etc/dovecot-sql.conf
userdb:
driver: sql
args: /usr/local/etc/dovecot-sql.conf
socket:
type: listen
client:
path: /var/spool/postfix/private/auth
mode: 432
user: postfix
group: postfix
master:
path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master
mode: 384
user: vmail
plugin:
quota: maildir:ignore=Trash
trash: /usr/local/etc/dovecot-trash.conf
charged:/usr/local/etc#
charged:/usr/local/etc# grep -v '^ *\(#.*\)\?$' dovecot-sql.conf
driver = mysql
connect = host=localhost dbname=xxx user=mailuser password=xxx
default_pass_scheme = MD5-CRYPT
user_query = SELECT maildir, 5000 AS uid, 5000 AS gid, CONCAT('*:storage=',
quota, 'B') AS quota_rule FROM mailbox WHERE username = '%u' AND active =
'1'
password_query = SELECT username as user, password, '/var/vmail/%d/%n' as
userdb_home, 'maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n' as userdb_mail, 5000 as userdb_uid,
5000 as userdb_gid FROM mailbox WHERE username = '%u' AND active = '1'
charged:/usr/local/etc#
charged:/usr/local/etc# dpkg -l | grep postfix
ii postfix 2.5.5-1.1
High-performance mail transport agent
ii postfix-mysql 2.5.5-1.1 MySQL map
support for Postfix
charged:/usr/local/etc#
Regards,
Shayne Jellesma
Network Administrator / ICT Support
St Martins Lutheran College
Web: http://www.stmartins.sa.edu.au http://www.stmartins.sa.edu.au
Phone: (08) 87 251 430
Skype: shayne.jellesma.smlc
Re: [Dovecot] delete messages after sa-learn
Hi Andrzej, 2010/5/28 Andrzej Adam Filip a...@onet.eu: does fetching to mbox file bring any advantage? It seems that learning out of maildir and rm'ing afterwards works like a charm, so I guess fetchmail would bring more overhead? It will bring more overhead but some people value portable solutions. Some people try to avoid locking THEMSELVES into a) specific format of IMAP folder As I understand dovecot recommends switching from maildir to dbox b) specific software (specific IMAP server) I do not plan to change dovecot but I do like to keep my options open. Anyway: instead of scanning all and deleting files in maildir (race risk) you may consider moving files to another file directory/folder (on the same file-system) and learn from it. You may ask Timo How to lock maildir message/file before moving it out/deleting it by non dovecot software :-) Hm, now I'm irritated a bit. :-) If I have a dedicated maildir directory (IMAP folder) for spam learn, what can happen if I scan and delete files out of it? The worst thing that can happen is that the IMAP folder gets corrupt, which is not harm, as it's spam anyway. However, from what I've heard, Maildir doesn't have any file locking issues, so there should be no problem? Florian
[Dovecot] quota and postfix virtual users
hi guys, anyone have a virtual server working with postfix + dovecot + roundcube + mysql + virtual domain + virtual users and quota working because the quota is not good, the calculation is wrong i need to delete the maildirsize file to force recalculate, how can i do? the email send and receive fine the virtual users and domain users is fine... help postfix 2.3.3 dovecot 1.2.11 roundcube 0.3 mysql 5.0.7 i need to solve this please
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.2 - Quotas - Ignoring Trash folder
Hello,
On 30.05.2010 13:34, wrote Shayne Jellesma:
Hello guys,
Firstly I would like to state that I am fairly new to Dovecot. I have played
around with it in the past here and there but mainly with debian packages.
I have compiled this version of Dovecot from source, so please go easy with
me.
Ok now down to my questions:
I am having trouble getting Dovecot to 'ignore' the Trash folder when
summing up the used quota for a user.
[snip]
plugin:
quota: maildir:ignore=Trash
Change this to
quota = maildir
[snip]
charged:/usr/local/etc# grep -v '^ *\(#.*\)\?$' dovecot-sql.conf
driver = mysql
connect = host=localhost dbname=xxx user=mailuser password=xxx
default_pass_scheme = MD5-CRYPT
user_query = SELECT maildir, 5000 AS uid, 5000 AS gid, CONCAT('*:storage=',
quota, 'B') AS quota_rule FROM mailbox WHERE username = '%u' AND active =
'1'
Insert a second quota_rule in your sql query
'Trash:ignore' AS quota_rule2
See also http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/1.1#Quota_rules
Regards,
e-frog
Re: [Dovecot] dovecot2beta5 lmtp
On 05/17/2010 05:00 PM Robert Schetterer wrote: … the most interesting thing for me with lmtp is that postfix bounces now overquota mails on smtp income stage with lmtp, no danger for backscatter anymore ( so far small tsts results ) … Hm, I hope you mean Postfix rejects the mail, if the user is over quota. Bouncing mails is bad. If your Postfix rejects the message, while the sending client is still connected, I'm interested in your setup. :) How does Postfix communicate with Dovecot's lmtp, unix or tcp socket? Any special smtpd_recipient_restrictions? Regards, Pascal -- The trapper recommends today: defaced.1015...@localdomain.org
Re: [Dovecot] quota and postfix virtual users
Il 30/05/2010 14:12, gbot...@emailforall.no-ip.org ha scritto: hi guys, anyone have a virtual server working with postfix + dovecot + roundcube + mysql + virtual domain + virtual users and quota working because the quota is not good, the calculation is wrong i need to delete the maildirsize file to force recalculate, how can i do? the email send and receive fine the virtual users and domain users is fine... help postfix 2.3.3 dovecot 1.2.11 roundcube 0.3 mysql 5.0.7 i need to solve this please i have a script that parses a recordset from mysql and exec this command for each mailbox: echo x GETQUOTAROOT Inbox | su vmail -c USER=$ROW /usr/sbin/dovecot --exec-mail imap -- Simone Caruso IT Consultant p.iva: 03045250838
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.2 - Quotas - Ignoring Trash folder
On 30.05.2010 15:28, wrote Shayne Jellesma:
Hello e-frog,
Thanks for your reply. I have made the changes you suggested and it is still
not working.
The new updated SQL query is as follows:
user_query = SELECT maildir, 5000 AS uid, 5000 AS gid, CONCAT('*:storage=',
quota, 'B') AS quota_rule, 'Trash:ignore' AS quota_rule2 FROM mailbox WHERE
username = '%u' AND active = '1'
Looks correct and works for me.
You could try and set mail_debug=yes in dovecot.conf
This should log the quota rules dovecot is using once you login. e.g.
May 30 15:36:52 server dovecot: IMAP(xxx): Quota rule: root=user
mailbox=* bytes=1073741824 messages=0
May 30 15:36:52 server dovecot: IMAP(xxx): Quota rule: root=user
mailbox=Trash ignored
Regards,
Shayne Jellesma
Network Administrator / ICT Support
St Martins Lutheran College
Web: http://www.stmartins.sa.edu.au
Skype: shayne.jellesma.smlc
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+shayne=stmartins.sa.edu...@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+shayne=stmartins.sa.edu...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of
e-frog
Sent: Sunday, 30 May 2010 10:09 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.2 - Quotas - Ignoring Trash folder
Hello,
On 30.05.2010 13:34, wrote Shayne Jellesma:
Hello guys,
Firstly I would like to state that I am fairly new to Dovecot. I have
played around with it in the past here and there but mainly with debian
packages.
I have compiled this version of Dovecot from source, so please go easy
with me.
Ok now down to my questions:
I am having trouble getting Dovecot to 'ignore' the Trash folder when
summing up the used quota for a user.
[snip]
plugin:
quota: maildir:ignore=Trash
Change this to
quota = maildir
[snip]
charged:/usr/local/etc# grep -v '^ *\(#.*\)\?$' dovecot-sql.conf
driver = mysql
connect = host=localhost dbname=xxx user=mailuser password=xxx
default_pass_scheme = MD5-CRYPT
user_query = SELECT maildir, 5000 AS uid, 5000 AS gid,
CONCAT('*:storage=', quota, 'B') AS quota_rule FROM mailbox WHERE
username = '%u' AND active = '1'
Insert a second quota_rule in your sql query
'Trash:ignore' AS quota_rule2
See also http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/1.1#Quota_rules
Regards,
e-frog
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
Hi, On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:12:17PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote: On 30.5.2010, at 12.03, Brandon Davidson wrote: If I '%define optflags -std=gnu99' in the spec it builds just fine, so I don't think it's a compiler problem. Maybe a libtool issue? Oh, the spec file overrides CFLAGS and doesn't contain -std=gnu99? The config.log for RHEL5/x86_64 says: CFLAGS='-std=gnu99 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -I/usr/kerberos/include ' -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgppdTwRiMoD3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Dovecot] delete messages after sa-learn
Florian Effenberger flo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Andrzej, 2010/5/28 Andrzej Adam Filip a...@onet.eu: does fetching to mbox file bring any advantage? It seems that learning out of maildir and rm'ing afterwards works like a charm, so I guess fetchmail would bring more overhead? It will bring more overhead but some people value portable solutions. Some people try to avoid locking THEMSELVES into a) specific format of IMAP folder As I understand dovecot recommends switching from maildir to dbox b) specific software (specific IMAP server) I do not plan to change dovecot but I do like to keep my options open. Anyway: instead of scanning all and deleting files in maildir (race risk) you may consider moving files to another file directory/folder (on the same file-system) and learn from it. You may ask Timo How to lock maildir message/file before moving it out/deleting it by non dovecot software :-) Hm, now I'm irritated a bit. :-) If I have a dedicated maildir directory (IMAP folder) for spam learn, what can happen if I scan and delete files out of it? The worst thing that can happen is that the IMAP folder gets corrupt, which is not harm, as it's spam anyway. However, from what I've heard, Maildir doesn't have any file locking issues, so there should be no problem? Florian It depends on what you want: a) dirtyugly but *trivial* hack serving your very specific requirement that can make troubles after some change in pattern of use b) simple solution -- [plen: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu 10) there is no 10, but it sounded like a nice number :) -- Wichert Akkerman
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
Axel, On 5/30/10 10:22 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Oh, the spec file overrides CFLAGS and doesn't contain -std=gnu99? The config.log for RHEL5/x86_64 says: CFLAGS='-std=gnu99 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -I/usr/kerberos/include ' It may be a specfile after all. %configure exports CFLAGS before calling ./configure, which should be sufficient to get any needed options into the Makefile, merged with whatever configure auto-detects (including -std=gnu99). Your spec also calls make CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS which overrides everything and omits -std=gnu99 unless specifically included by the packager. If I remove that and just call 'make' it works fine - my %optflags are merged in with the CFLAGS from configure and the build completes without error. -Brad
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
Hi, On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:22:52PM -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote: On 5/30/10 10:22 AM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Oh, the spec file overrides CFLAGS and doesn't contain -std=gnu99? The config.log for RHEL5/x86_64 says: CFLAGS='-std=gnu99 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -I/usr/kerberos/include ' It may be a specfile after all. %configure exports CFLAGS before calling ./configure, which should be sufficient to get any needed options into the Makefile, merged with whatever configure auto-detects (including -std=gnu99). Your spec also calls make CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS which overrides everything and omits -std=gnu99 unless specifically included by the packager. No, that's not quite correct. If you check the above you will find that the CFLAGS passed on the make argument list is just the starting value for CFLAGS. The -std=gnu99 is added by configure, there is no need to have it added by the packager. If I remove that and just call 'make' it works fine - my %optflags are merged in with the CFLAGS from configure and the build completes without error. How are your %optflags (which is the same as $RPM_OPT_FLAGS) merged into the build if it is not passed to make? And it would yield the same CFLAGS as above (merged default optflags with what configure adds to it). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpeZbu7mbE7c.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.2 - Quotas - Ignoring Trash folder
Hello,
I am getting a slightly different output in my log file with
mail_debug=yes set in my config:
May 31 09:25:51 IMAP(xxx): Info: Quota root: name= backend=maildir args=
May 31 09:25:51 IMAP(xxx): Info: Quota rule: root= mailbox=* bytes=1024
messages=0
May 31 09:25:51 IMAP(xxx): Info: Quota rule: root= mailbox=Trash ignored
Regards,
Shayne Jellesma
Network Administrator / ICT Support
St Martins Lutheran College
Web: http://www.stmartins.sa.edu.au
Phone: (08) 87 251 430
Mobile: 0439 491 590
Skype: shayne.jellesma.smlc
-Original Message-
From: e-frog [mailto:e-f...@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, 30 May 2010 11:28 PM
To: Dovecot List
Cc: Shayne Jellesma
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.2 - Quotas - Ignoring Trash folder
On 30.05.2010 15:28, wrote Shayne Jellesma:
Hello e-frog,
Thanks for your reply. I have made the changes you suggested and it is
still not working.
The new updated SQL query is as follows:
user_query = SELECT maildir, 5000 AS uid, 5000 AS gid,
CONCAT('*:storage=', quota, 'B') AS quota_rule, 'Trash:ignore' AS
quota_rule2 FROM mailbox WHERE username = '%u' AND active = '1'
Looks correct and works for me.
You could try and set mail_debug=yes in dovecot.conf
This should log the quota rules dovecot is using once you login. e.g.
May 30 15:36:52 server dovecot: IMAP(xxx): Quota rule: root=user
mailbox=* bytes=1073741824 messages=0
May 30 15:36:52 server dovecot: IMAP(xxx): Quota rule: root=user
mailbox=Trash ignored
Regards,
Shayne Jellesma
Network Administrator / ICT Support
St Martins Lutheran College
Web: http://www.stmartins.sa.edu.au
Skype: shayne.jellesma.smlc
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+shayne=stmartins.sa.edu...@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+shayne=stmartins.sa.edu...@dovecot.org] On
Behalf Of e-frog
Sent: Sunday, 30 May 2010 10:09 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.2 - Quotas - Ignoring Trash folder
Hello,
On 30.05.2010 13:34, wrote Shayne Jellesma:
Hello guys,
Firstly I would like to state that I am fairly new to Dovecot. I have
played around with it in the past here and there but mainly with
debian
packages.
I have compiled this version of Dovecot from source, so please go
easy with me.
Ok now down to my questions:
I am having trouble getting Dovecot to 'ignore' the Trash folder when
summing up the used quota for a user.
[snip]
plugin:
quota: maildir:ignore=Trash
Change this to
quota = maildir
[snip]
charged:/usr/local/etc# grep -v '^ *\(#.*\)\?$' dovecot-sql.conf
driver = mysql
connect = host=localhost dbname=xxx user=mailuser password=xxx
default_pass_scheme = MD5-CRYPT
user_query = SELECT maildir, 5000 AS uid, 5000 AS gid,
CONCAT('*:storage=', quota, 'B') AS quota_rule FROM mailbox WHERE
username = '%u' AND active = '1'
Insert a second quota_rule in your sql query
'Trash:ignore' AS quota_rule2
See also http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/1.1#Quota_rules
Regards,
e-frog
Re: [Dovecot] quota and postfix virtual users
hi, Simone Caruso, thanks for your answer but i have some questions i test the script in the console and he works he read the quota pased by mysql and then quota_rule ok but he update the maildirsize file??? and this script have to be called from postfix or dovecot?? thanks for all, sorry for my english ;) Guillermo Botero Leticia, Amazonas - Colombia gbosp...@gmail.com
[Dovecot] Dovecot install problem
I am trying to set up a new web and mail server i have postfix now working but dovecot will not allow me to login and retrieve the emails so below isa portion of the log file passwd-file /var/mail/vhosts/.net/shadow: stat() failed: Permission denied passwd-file(xx...@.net,:::0.0.0.0): no passwd file: /var/mail/vhosts/.net/shadow Dovecot -n output # 1.0.7: /etc/dovecot.conf login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3-login mail_location: Maildir:/var/mail/vhosts/%d/%n mail_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap mail_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap mail_executable(pop3): /usr/libexec/dovecot/pop3 mail_plugin_dir(default): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir(imap): /usr/lib/dovecot/imap mail_plugin_dir(pop3): /usr/lib/dovecot/pop3 auth default: mechanisms: plain login CRAM-MD5 verbose: yes debug: yes debug_passwords: yes passdb: driver: passwd-file args: /var/mail/vhosts/%d/shadow userdb: driver: passwd-file args: /var/mail/vhosts/%d/passwd socket: type: listen client: path: /var/spool/postfix/private/auth mode: 432 user: postfix group: postfix The passwd shadow file -rw-r- 1 root root 210 May 24 21:39 passwd -rw-r- 1 root root 327 May 24 21:39 shadow So who whould own these files? What should the perrmissions be?
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
On 5/30/10 2:49 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: How are your %optflags (which is the same as $RPM_OPT_FLAGS) merged into the build if it is not passed to make? And it would yield the same CFLAGS as above (merged default optflags with what configure adds to it). They're exported by the %configure macro, and configure writes the combined CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, and FFLAGS into the Makefile... so it's not necessary (and possibly detrimental) to both export them before configuring and pass them explicitly to make, as the command-line CLFAGS option overrides the Makefile CFLAGS declaration that includes -std=gnu99. My point is, if I don't inclue CFLAGS=... in my call to make in the spec file, it builds fine, and *does* include all the necessary optflags. Give it a try. -Brad
Re: [Dovecot] beta5 builds under RHEL
Hi, On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 08:02:03PM -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote: On 5/30/10 2:49 PM, Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: How are your %optflags (which is the same as $RPM_OPT_FLAGS) merged into the build [...] They're exported by the %configure macro, and configure writes the combined CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, and FFLAGS into the Makefile... so it's not necessary (and possibly detrimental) to both export them before configuring and pass them explicitly to make, as the command-line CLFAGS option overrides the Makefile CFLAGS declaration that includes -std=gnu99. True, I wasn't wearing my brain in the last post ;) Indeed, both configure and make were getting the same CFLAGS, and while configure was properly altering it, the make invocation was resetting it again. :/ More interesting is the fact that I introduced the bug with the dovecot-2.x specfile, so the 1.x builds were unaffected. I wonder how this did sneak in. My point is, if I don't inclue CFLAGS=... in my call to make in the spec file, it builds fine, and *does* include all the necessary optflags. Give it a try. Doing so and RHEL5/x86_64 already built w/o an issue, I now quite positive that the rest including RHEL4 will be as happy! Thanks for finding the bug! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgp11nYLxDU2q.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Dovecot] FW: Dovecot 1.2 - Quotas - Ignoring Trash folder
Hello all,
There was a problem with email account. Deleted it and readded and
everything seems to be working.
Thanks e-frog :)
Regards,
Shayne Jellesma
Network Administrator / ICT Support
St Martins Lutheran College
Web: http://www.stmartins.sa.edu.au
Skype: shayne.jellesma.smlc
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+shayne=stmartins.sa.edu...@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+shayne=stmartins.sa.edu...@dovecot.org] On Behalf Of
Shayne Jellesma
Sent: Monday, 31 May 2010 9:33 AM
To: 'e-frog'
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.2 - Quotas - Ignoring Trash folder
Hello,
I am getting a slightly different output in my log file with
mail_debug=yes set in my config:
May 31 09:25:51 IMAP(xxx): Info: Quota root: name= backend=maildir args= May
31 09:25:51 IMAP(xxx): Info: Quota rule: root= mailbox=* bytes=1024
messages=0
May 31 09:25:51 IMAP(xxx): Info: Quota rule: root= mailbox=Trash ignored
Regards,
Shayne Jellesma
Network Administrator / ICT Support
St Martins Lutheran College
Web: http://www.stmartins.sa.edu.au
Skype: shayne.jellesma.smlc
-Original Message-
From: e-frog [mailto:e-f...@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, 30 May 2010 11:28 PM
To: Dovecot List
Cc: Shayne Jellesma
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.2 - Quotas - Ignoring Trash folder
On 30.05.2010 15:28, wrote Shayne Jellesma:
Hello e-frog,
Thanks for your reply. I have made the changes you suggested and it is
still not working.
The new updated SQL query is as follows:
user_query = SELECT maildir, 5000 AS uid, 5000 AS gid,
CONCAT('*:storage=', quota, 'B') AS quota_rule, 'Trash:ignore' AS
quota_rule2 FROM mailbox WHERE username = '%u' AND active = '1'
Looks correct and works for me.
You could try and set mail_debug=yes in dovecot.conf
This should log the quota rules dovecot is using once you login. e.g.
May 30 15:36:52 server dovecot: IMAP(xxx): Quota rule: root=user
mailbox=* bytes=1073741824 messages=0
May 30 15:36:52 server dovecot: IMAP(xxx): Quota rule: root=user
mailbox=Trash ignored
Regards,
Shayne Jellesma
Network Administrator / ICT Support
St Martins Lutheran College
Web: http://www.stmartins.sa.edu.au
Skype: shayne.jellesma.smlc
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+shayne=stmartins.sa.edu...@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-bounces+shayne=stmartins.sa.edu...@dovecot.org] On
Behalf Of e-frog
Sent: Sunday, 30 May 2010 10:09 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 1.2 - Quotas - Ignoring Trash folder
Hello,
On 30.05.2010 13:34, wrote Shayne Jellesma:
Hello guys,
Firstly I would like to state that I am fairly new to Dovecot. I have
played around with it in the past here and there but mainly with
debian
packages.
I have compiled this version of Dovecot from source, so please go
easy with me.
Ok now down to my questions:
I am having trouble getting Dovecot to 'ignore' the Trash folder when
summing up the used quota for a user.
[snip]
plugin:
quota: maildir:ignore=Trash
Change this to
quota = maildir
[snip]
charged:/usr/local/etc# grep -v '^ *\(#.*\)\?$' dovecot-sql.conf
driver = mysql
connect = host=localhost dbname=xxx user=mailuser password=xxx
default_pass_scheme = MD5-CRYPT
user_query = SELECT maildir, 5000 AS uid, 5000 AS gid,
CONCAT('*:storage=', quota, 'B') AS quota_rule FROM mailbox WHERE
username = '%u' AND active = '1'
Insert a second quota_rule in your sql query
'Trash:ignore' AS quota_rule2
See also http://wiki.dovecot.org/Quota/1.1#Quota_rules
Regards,
e-frog
