Re: [Dovecot] Command died with signal 11: amp;amp ; amp; quot; /usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda amp;amp; amp; quot;
Timo Sirainen tss at iki.fi writes: On 26.10.2010, at 9.38, Xiiph wrote: In order to avoid flooding I uploaded the gdb backtrace. You can find it here: http://bit.ly/9WqDkM That looks exactly like the problem that was fixed in 2.0.6. I don't think you're using 2.0.6's dovecot-lda. That backtrace couldn't happen with it. Doh! You are 100% correct, I had compiled 2.0.6 but had not executed the final install command. While waiting for a good time to take the production server down, I forgot all about it. Thanks a lot for making me aware of this, and for trying to solve a non-existent issue! Best regards, X
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0.5 crash when It cannot remove maildir
W dniu 2010-10-14 17:53, Timo Sirainen pisze: On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:22 +0200, Len7hir wrote: This is scenario that cause segmentation fault in my Dovecot. Thanks, fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/a3e40c6b14fe This fix is not working property. Now I have this in logs: 465354 Oct 27 10:53:09 imap(i...@onet.eu): Error: Folder Junk(3941) is already open And this is server answer: o NO [SERVERBUG] Internal error occurred. Refer to server log for more information. [2010-10-27 10:53:09] Junk is example folder that Dovecot can't remove. -- Len7hir
[Dovecot] Problem with namespace (maybe bug?)
Hi! Could you tell me what is wrong with an existence of mailbox? Please see the two examples: . list * * LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Trash * LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Junk * LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Sent * LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Drafts * LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Archives * LIST (\HasNoChildren) / INBOX * LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Public/AddressBook * LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Public/PublicMails * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) / Shared/dziobak * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) / Shared/tester2 * LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Shared/dziobak/root * LIST (\HasChildren) / Shared/tester2/sdfgsg * LIST (\HasChildren) / Shared/tester2/sdfgsg/gsdfgf * LIST (\HasChildren) / Shared/tester2/sdfgsg/gsdfgf/vtyjyfgj * LIST (\HasChildren) / Shared/tester2/sdfgsg/gsdfgf/vtyjyfgj/rtdhrthxs * LIST (\HasNoChildren) / Shared/tester2/sdfgsg/gsdfgf/vtyjyfgj/rtdhrthxs/zhfhg . OK List completed. This looks OK. . list (subscribed) * * LIST (\Subscribed) / Trash * LIST (\Subscribed) / Junk * LIST (\Subscribed) / Sent * LIST (\Subscribed) / Drafts * LIST (\Subscribed \NonExistent) / Public/AddressBook * LIST (\Subscribed \NonExistent) / Public/PublicMails * LIST (\Subscribed \NonExistent) / Public/ * LIST (\Subscribed) / Archives * LIST (\Subscribed \NonExistent) / Shared/dziobak/root * LIST (\Subscribed \NonExistent) / Shared/tester2/sdfgsg * LIST (\Subscribed \NonExistent) / Shared/tester2/sdfgsg/gsdfgf * LIST (\Subscribed \NonExistent) / Shared/tester2/sdfgsg/gsdfgf/vtyjyfgj * LIST (\Subscribed \NonExistent) / Shared/tester2/sdfgsg/gsdfgf/vtyjyfgj/rtdhrthxs * LIST (\Subscribed \NonExistent) / Shared/tester2/sdfgsg/gsdfgf/vtyjyfgj/rtdhrthxs/zhfhg * LIST (\Subscribed \NonExistent) / Shared/ . OK List completed. Why the public and shared mailboxes have flag \NonExistent? Here is a cut of dovecot -n # 1.2.14: /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE i386 namespace: type: private separator: / inbox: yes list: yes subscriptions: yes namespace: type: public separator: / prefix: Public/ location: maildir:/home/public/Maildir:CONTROL=~/Maildir/control/public:INDEX=~/Maildir/index/public list: children namespace: type: shared separator: / prefix: Shared/%%u/ location: maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/index/shared/%%u list: children plugin: autocreate: Trash autocreate2: Junk autocreate3: Sent autocreate4: Drafts autocreate5: Archives autosubscribe: Trash autosubscribe2: Junk autosubscribe3: Sent autosubscribe4: Drafts autosubscribe5: Public.AddressBook autosubscribe6: Public.PublicMails autosubscribe7: Archives acl: vfile:/usr/local/etc/dovecot/acls acl_shared_dict: file:/usr/local/etc/dovecot/shared/shared-mailboxes.db Could you tell me where is the problem, is it a bug or my config mistake? -- Pozdrawiam Łukasz
[Dovecot] Help with implementing quota warning
Dear All,
I am using the latest version of doveot-2.0.6 and using
dovecot-lda to deliver mail in to Maildir. I have successfully
implemented the global quota as well as per user quota using ldap for
storing per user quota. Now i am trying to send warning message when
user exceed quota limit of 80% and 95% but unable to implement the
same.
Here is the output of doveconf -n
# 2.0.6: /usr/local/dovecot/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686 Ubuntu 10.10
base_dir = /var/run/dovecot/
disable_plaintext_auth = no
hostname = mail.example.net
lda_mailbox_autocreate = yes
lda_mailbox_autosubscribe = yes
listen = *
log_path = /var/log/imap
login_greeting = IMAP4 and POP3 server ready to serve you.
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir
mail_plugins = acl quota
passdb {
args = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext
driver = ldap
}
plugin {
acl = vfile:/usr/local/dovecot-acl/acl:cache_secs=3600
autocreate = Sent Items
autocreate2 = Drafts
autocreate3 = Spam
autocreate4 = Deleted Items
autosubscribe = Sent Items
autosubscribe2 = Drafts
autosubscribe3 = Spam
autosubscribe4 = Deleted Items
quota = maildir:User quota
quota_rule = *:storage=1G
quota_warning = storage=95%% /usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh 95 %u
quota_warning2 = storage=80%% /usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh 80 %u
}
postmaster_address = ad...@example.net
protocols = imap pop3
service imap-login {
inet_listener imap {
port = 143
}
}
service pop3-login {
inet_listener pop3 {
port = 110
}
}
service quota-warning {
executable = script /usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh
unix_listener quota-warning {
user = vmail
}
user = dovecot
}
ssl = no
userdb {
args = /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext
driver = ldap
}
protocol lda {
mail_plugins = acl quota
}
protocol imap {
mail_plugins = acl quota autocreate imap_acl imap_quota
}
protocol pop3 {
mail_plugins = acl quota
}
Here is quota-warning.sh content
#!/bin/sh
PERCENT=$1
USER=$2
cat EOF | /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -d $USER
-o plugin/quota=maildir:User quota:noenforcing
From: postmas...@teamgenesys.net
Subject: quota warning
Your mailbox is now $PERCENT% full.
Please delete unnecessary mail or request more space.
This is an automated message, please do not respond.
EOF
All the users are virtual users and running under vmail id.
I am getting the following error in log file when user reaches 80% of
defined quota limit
Error: quota: net_connect_unix(/usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh)
failed: Connection refused
Is it configuration issue or anyting else ??
Thanks hoping to get response
Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:52 -0200, Andre Nathan wrote: They're not happening all the time. It showed up two or three times in the logs during the night. A few errors of this kind appeared in the logs last night. The Log synchronization error appears more frequently than Corrupted transaction log file, but I assume the former is a consequence of the latter. This really seems to be related to the shared accounts. Our load balancer makes no attempt to send the same users to the same server; it just sends connections based on server load. This allows two simultaneous connections to access an account, one on each server. Given a distributed FS, this should be OK, right? At least in theory it's no different than two CPU cores accessing the same account in a single server. Best regards, Andre
[Dovecot] blackberry emails
Does anyone have clients using blackberrys to access their emails on a dovecot server? If so are there any gotcha's that I need to configure in dovecot for this to work? Looks like all emails go to and from a blackberry server before getting to clients. thanks, ddh -- Dwayne Hottinger Network Administrator Harrisonburg City Public Schools Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who, in times of moral crisis, preserved their neutrality. -- Dante
Re: [Dovecot] blackberry emails
On 10/27/2010 8:17 AM, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: Does anyone have clients using blackberrys to access their emails on a dovecot server? If so are there any gotcha's that I need to configure in dovecot for this to work? Looks like all emails go to and from a blackberry server before getting to clients. thanks, ddh If you are referring to using a BES (Blackberry Enterprise Server) then I don't think it will work with dovecot. As far as I know BES only works with Exchange and Novell groupwise. If you want to forward the emails to a standard BIS account though that should work except replying to those emails will come from the carrier network and not your own. Donny B.
Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:52 -0200, Andre Nathan wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: Have you set mmap_disable=yes? Yep. Just out of curiosity, is this setting really needed, or is it for performance reasons? OCFS2 claims to support mmap: http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/linux/025995.htm Regards, Andre
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0.5 - multiple auth processes.
W dniu 20.10.2010 16:35, Timo Sirainen pisze:
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:11 +0200, Marek Miska wrote:
On Dovecot 1.2.x it is possible to run multiple auth daemons.
Is it possible on dovecot 2.0.x ?
Not really..
Any plan to support it in future?
Or at least multiple LDAP connections from one auth process?
Problem of course is with bind requests (they can be send only one at time).
It can be problem on a busy server.
(2 connections for userdb and passdb is not enough, bind request still
go through one connection).
Of course auth_bind = no will help, but it lowers security.
Any other idea?
Sample configuration for dovecot 1.2.8:
auth default {
count = 10
Hmm. Did this really work? I remember there were at least some problems
with this .. possibly only when using auth-workers (i.e. with some
passdbs/userdbs, but not with e.g. ldap).
It seems to work on 1.2.8.
Re: [Dovecot] blackberry emails
There is a BES that works with IMAP. You can also get a 'real' Java IMAP client for blackberry - http://www.logicprobe.org/proj/logicmail Rick Quoting Donny Brooks dbro...@mdah.state.ms.us: On 10/27/2010 8:17 AM, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: Does anyone have clients using blackberrys to access their emails on a dovecot server? If so are there any gotcha's that I need to configure in dovecot for this to work? Looks like all emails go to and from a blackberry server before getting to clients. thanks, ddh If you are referring to using a BES (Blackberry Enterprise Server) then I don't think it will work with dovecot. As far as I know BES only works with Exchange and Novell groupwise. If you want to forward the emails to a standard BIS account though that should work except replying to those emails will come from the carrier network and not your own. Donny B.
Re: [Dovecot] Dovecot 2.0.5 - multiple auth processes.
On 27.10.2010, at 15.47, Marek Miska wrote: On Dovecot 1.2.x it is possible to run multiple auth daemons. Is it possible on dovecot 2.0.x ? Not really.. Any plan to support it in future? Maybe, but it's not simple. Or at least multiple LDAP connections from one auth process? That's easier to do. I was planning on making LDAP code more flexible anyway at some point.. Maybe for v2.1. Problem of course is with bind requests (they can be send only one at time). It can be problem on a busy server. (2 connections for userdb and passdb is not enough, bind request still go through one connection). Right.
Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted transaction log file
On 27.10.2010, at 15.48, Andre Nathan wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:52 -0200, Andre Nathan wrote: On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 22:39 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote: Have you set mmap_disable=yes? Yep. Just out of curiosity, is this setting really needed, or is it for performance reasons? OCFS2 claims to support mmap: If mmap is supported, it's not necessary, but might still be better for performance (or might not, depending on filesystem's mmap implementation..) This really seems to be related to the shared accounts. Our load balancer makes no attempt to send the same users to the same server; it just sends connections based on server load. This allows two simultaneous connections to access an account, one on each server. Given a distributed FS, this should be OK, right? At least in theory it's no different than two CPU cores accessing the same account in a single server. In theory sure.. But Dovecot's indexes have already been heavily stress tested in local filesystems with multiple CPU cores and it should be stable nowadays. If you can easily break it with a clusterfs, the problem is clearly the clusterfs itself. You could easily try this with imaptest http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest by running it for the same mailbox in two OCFS2 nodes at the same time and see if Dovecot immediately starts logging errors.
Re: [Dovecot] anti-spam+anti-malware suggestions
I use, spamassassin, postfix , mailscanner, dovecot before i use postgrey, but it was giving to many problens because we scaled for many host. I am loking for sqlgrey now to test it. []'sf.rique On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Robert M. Münch robert.mue...@saphirion.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA384 Am 25.10.2010 um 19:40 schrieb Marc Perkel: On 10/20/2010 9:20 AM, Jose Luis Faria wrote: Hello people, I am using now qmail in cluster with LDAP + Interscan Messaging Security Suite from Trendmicro. I need to develop a new solution with: - postfix - dovecot - anti-spam - anti-malware. I am thankful any help or suggestion for anti-spam and anti-malware. Thanks in advance! You can try a front end spam filter service and not have to deal with it at all. http://www.junkemailfilter.com The best anti-spam system is ASSP. Install it, train it and you have 99.8% of all spam eliminated on the server. We use it since years with very good results. - -- Robert M. Münch Mobil: +49 177 245 2802 http://www.saphirion.com Smarter|Better|Faster Saphirion Ltd Co KG Schumannstr. 3 D - 76185 Karlsruhe Tel : +49 721 5978501 Fax: +49 721 5978502 Registergericht: Amtsgericht Mannheim HRA 105339 Alleinige persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin: Quiyo Verwaltungs Limited Registered Office: 76 High Street, Newport Pagnell, Milton Keynes, MK 16 8AQ, Great Britain. Company Number: 5705018 Vertretungsberechtigter Geschäftsführer: Robert M. Münch Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer gemäß § 27 a Umsatzsteuergesetz: DE 24939452. Inhaltlich Verantwortlicher gemäß § 10 Absatz 3 MDStV: Robert M. Münch (Anschrift wie oben) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP Desktop 10.0.2 (Build 13) Charset: iso-8859-1 wsBVAwUBTMXgEHSQa/BbHGLwAQlZagf/a36cq4Y+sf6dqW8oOcQDBhohDedMEuoi HH6MmKw2Xvvcy4g6FS4nvsTwKhQyl7EVd2RP9rfUNbxeaisINnF4HMf7l1bWAzlL kjJ8RjKieis2bYBanyaQ7OpWddkvpgvMc0m25c3zNhvMaO26CO8f1/59UcrgOb8r F8V1KdJbwcLL/UVHCPVnMwm9uKlEdh5t4YFCjdo2eplgzhaPDYk0mw7N8929ZmlN uDVHd2xPMnyNFl3rUsQPCAanDCL/Z3anYo8pXhAR49B6ZxjF11V/zYZj2yOjWXiM /I9CVsyyyD4YalCVphZSqZpAa0luVQxMVV7hoOFKlCcmke49CN2a4A== =wgDg -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Dovecot] deliver + quota
Hi list, can someone please explain me the following behaviour of deliver in combination with fs-quota and reading from stdin: # repquota -a | grep ud_3p5 ud_3p5--4464 10240 12288 10 0 0 # stat -c %s /tmp/mymail 4524853 so there's enough space for this mail # su ud_3p5 -s/bin/sh -c cat /tmp/mymail | /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -e; echo \$? sda6: warning, user block quota exceeded. sda6: write failed, user block limit reached. Not enough disk space 77 vs. # su ud_3p5 -s/bin/sh -c /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -p /tmp/mymail -e; echo \$? 0 Must have something to do with create_raw_stream inside deliver.c System is running Dovecot v1.2.13 Thanks, / manuel
Re: [Dovecot] dovecot Digest, Vol 90, Issue 102
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 12:24 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: Alan Brown wrote: ATrpms has builds too, but they're usually out of date. Yeah way of of date. 1.0.7 I think is what I saw. Hm, ATrpms is usually shipping packages within a few days after a release as well as packages of beta releases. What makes you think ATrpms is at 1.0.7? FWIW ATrpms currently carries the following dovecot versions: 1.0.15-1_74 1.1.20-1_98 1.2.15-1_113 2.0.6-0_121 -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] blackberry emails
On 10/27/2010 12:06 PM, Frank Bonnet wrote: Le 27/10/2010 15:21, Donny Brooks a écrit : On 10/27/2010 8:17 AM, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: Does anyone have clients using blackberrys to access their emails on a dovecot server? If so are there any gotcha's that I need to configure in dovecot for this to work? Looks like all emails go to and from a blackberry server before getting to clients. thanks, ddh If you are referring to using a BES (Blackberry Enterprise Server) then I don't think it will work with dovecot. As far as I know BES only works with Exchange and Novell groupwise. If you want to forward the emails to a standard BIS account though that should work except replying to those emails will come from the carrier network and not your own. Donny B. I think Blackberry servers are able to connect to Dovecot as many students here use Blackberry and I can see many connections from RIM on my server , so I think there is some mechanisms to configure Blackberry to fetch private emails. Yes you are referring to standard BIS service. That is what any blackberry has when you get it from any carrier. There is a way to have it connect to a personal email account on an imap server. I actually have a dovecot/postfix server doing one of my domains email and have the email delivered to my berry. It just is not instantly pushed to the phone like it is with BIS/BES hosted emails.
Re: [Dovecot] Released Pigeonhole v0.2.1 for Dovecot v2.0.4
Hi Juan,
sorry for the late reply I just picked this up mentioning ATrpms:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 19:05 +0200, Juan C. Blanco wrote:
Hello Stephan I have some problems to build pigeonhole 0.2.1 over dovect
2.0.5, I've had no problems with previous versions; the system is CentOS
5.5.
FWIW CentOS is supported at ATrpms and there are packages for 0.2.1
there for CentOS, if you need them.
I think that is autotools related, but not sure.
I've dounloaded the archive for pigeonhole, once decompressed:
If I do:
./configure --with-dovecot=../dovecot-2.0.5
make
All seems to work fine
But if I do (like the atrpms package spec):
autoreconf -ifv
./configure --with-dovecot=../dovecot-2.0.5
make
I get the error:
I checked the pigeonhole specfiles at ATrpms, but could not find any
such call, the %build part has been
%build
## crude hack ...
#./autogen.sh
%configure --with-dovecot=%{_libdir}/dovecot \
--with-managesieve=yes \
--enable-header-install=yes \
INSTALL_DATA=install -c -p -m644
make
for quite some time now.
--
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Convert Plugin
Dr Matthew Williams wrote on 10/27/2010: Hello, I have been investigating mailbox conversions and have used the convert plugin under Dovecot V1.x. I cannot find the plugin in the list on the wiki for Dovcot V2.x, is it not included for a reason? I understand that I can do a post-login script to do the conversion, any guidance on best practices? you can use dsync instead. Link: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Dsync -- Daniel
Re: [Dovecot] Per User Quotas with LDAP on Dovecot 1.x
On 10/10/19 08:01, Timo Sirainen wrote:
No. The username is sent another way to deliver. Anyway, I think -d
$RECIPIENT is the right way.
Timo,
I modified the mailbox command in /etc/postfix/main.cf:
mailbox_command = /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient}
This causes postfix to bounce the message with this error:
Oct 27 09:06:57 rb8 postfix/local[1931]: A99494E0D25:
to=loadt...@subaru.naoj.org, relay=local, delay=10,
delays=0.08/0/0/10, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (command line usage error.
Command output: Fatal: Missing -d argument )
Any ideas?
Best Regards,
Camron
--
Camron W. Fox
Hilo Office
High Performance Computing Group
Fujitsu Management Services of America, Inc.
E-mail: cw...@us.fujitsu.com
Re: [Dovecot] Per User Quotas with LDAP on Dovecot 1.x
On 27.10.2010, at 21.11, Camron W. Fox wrote:
mailbox_command = /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient}
This causes postfix to bounce the message with this error:
Oct 27 09:06:57 rb8 postfix/local[1931]: A99494E0D25:
to=loadt...@subaru.naoj.org, relay=local, delay=10,
delays=0.08/0/0/10, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (command line usage error.
Command output: Fatal: Missing -d argument )
-d has no argument, i.e. ${recipient} expands to empty. Maybe it's case
sensitive? Try ${RECIPIENT} ? If not, find something else from Postfix docs..
Re: [Dovecot] dovecot Digest, Vol 90, Issue 102
Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 12:24 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: Alan Brown wrote: ATrpms has builds too, but they're usually out of date. Yeah way of of date. 1.0.7 I think is what I saw. Hm, ATrpms is usually shipping packages within a few days after a release as well as packages of beta releases. What makes you think ATrpms is at 1.0.7? I probably mis-read the YUM output. FWIW ATrpms currently carries the following dovecot versions: 1.0.15-1_74 1.1.20-1_98 1.2.15-1_113 2.0.6-0_121 Maybe I'm doing the YUM stuff wrong. When I disabled all the repos and enabled ATrpms I got no results. Better check that I'm using a good/current repo file. :-( \\||/ Rod --
[Dovecot] auth crash in 2.0.3
Here's another one-off crash in dovecot-2.0.3's auth process. Looks like request-mech == NULL in auth_request_initial(). I don't see any obvious fixes to this code between 2.0.3 and 2.0.6 so it may still be present in 2.0.6. Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV) Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0018 0 auth0x00010d89381b auth_request_initial + 85 1 auth0x00010d891844 auth_penalty_anvil_callback + 207 2 libdovecot.0.dylib 0x00010d8ea44f anvil_client_connect + 364 3 libdovecot.0.dylib 0x00010d8f77e9 io_loop_handler_run + 234 4 libdovecot.0.dylib 0x00010d8f82bb io_loop_run + 56 5 libdovecot.0.dylib 0x00010d8edf98 master_service_run + 27 6 auth0x00010d89b18a main + 674 7 auth0x00010d88ec14 start + 52 There were several Timeout waiting for handshake from auth server errors from imap-login and pop3-login in the minutes before this crash.
Re: [Dovecot] Per User Quotas with LDAP on Dovecot 1.x
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:11:02 -1000
Camron W. Fox cw...@us.fujitsu.com articulated:
On 10/10/19 08:01, Timo Sirainen wrote:
No. The username is sent another way to deliver. Anyway, I think -d
$RECIPIENT is the right way.
Timo,
I modified the mailbox command in /etc/postfix/main.cf:
mailbox_command = /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient}
This causes postfix to bounce the message with this error:
Oct 27 09:06:57 rb8 postfix/local[1931]: A99494E0D25:
to=loadt...@subaru.naoj.org, relay=local, delay=10,
delays=0.08/0/0/10, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (command line usage
error. Command output: Fatal: Missing -d argument )
See: http://www.postfix.com/postconf.5.html#mailbox_command
If you still cannot get it to work, I would suggest asking on the
Postfix forum since it is issuing the error message.
--
Jerry ✌
dovecot.u...@seibercom.net
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
[Dovecot] imap can't reconnect to auth-master after setuid
With service imap { client_limit = 5, service_count = 0 }, when the auth
process crashes the existing imap processes cannot reconnect to the auth-master
socket because they have long ago dropped root privileges. Is the right
solution to this:
(1) change the perms on the auth-master socket so processes running as
vmail:vmail can connect to it, or
(2) change the code so that multi-client imap processes stop accepting new
clients when they notice an auth bounce?
If (1), the wiki should be updated to mention this.
Thanks.
Re: [Dovecot] imap can't reconnect to auth-master after setuid
On 27.10.2010, at 22.25, Mike Abbott wrote:
With service imap { client_limit = 5, service_count = 0 },
This still isn't all that recommended, since one connection can hang other
connections in same process.
when the auth process crashes
Which of course shouldn't happen :)
the existing imap processes cannot reconnect to the auth-master socket
because they have long ago dropped root privileges. Is the right solution to
this:
(1) change the perms on the auth-master socket so processes running as
vmail:vmail can connect to it, or
(2) change the code so that multi-client imap processes stop accepting new
clients when they notice an auth bounce?
Hmm. I'd prefer (2). I'll see about implementing it next week (I'm traveling
this week).
[Dovecot] rpath in pigeonhole (was: dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole-0.2.1 installation in wrong lib dir?)
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 21:49 +0200, wolfgang.frie...@desy.de wrote: On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 17:47 +0200, wolfgang.frie...@desy.de wrote: Therefore the executable will fail to run: ldd /usr/libexec/dovecot/managesieve-login libdovecot-login.so.0 = not found libdovecot.so.0 = not found To me this looks like a bug in the generated Makefile. Could it be that the missing -R is related to --disable-static and --disable-rpath options to configure which I took over from the ATrpms dovecot spec file? Then it would rather be my ignorance of the dependencies between these options, libtool, dovecot and pigeonhole. Sorry for picking this up three weeks later, I didn't notice the issue from the subject. --disable-rpath is supposed to remove rpath calls. But in dovecot's build --disable-rpath seems to not have any effect, there are still -rpath /usr/lib64/dovecot args in the build log (which are needed). Looking at it a bit deeper --disable-rpath seems to only apply if you use the macros from lib-link.m4 (as shipped with gettext for example), so it looks like it's a no-ops for dovecot. Still managesieve-login manages to be built w/o rpath. But this is in another specfile altogether, which doesn't even use --disable-rpath. So the issue is somewhere else. I'll do some more testing and report back. Best regards to all people in Zeuthen that can still remember me. :) -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] Per User Quotas with LDAP on Dovecot 1.x
On 10/10/27 09:56, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:11:02 -1000
Camron W. Fox cw...@us.fujitsu.com articulated:
On 10/10/19 08:01, Timo Sirainen wrote:
No. The username is sent another way to deliver. Anyway, I think -d
$RECIPIENT is the right way.
Timo,
I modified the mailbox command in /etc/postfix/main.cf:
mailbox_command = /usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d ${recipient}
This causes postfix to bounce the message with this error:
Oct 27 09:06:57 rb8 postfix/local[1931]: A99494E0D25:
to=loadt...@subaru.naoj.org, relay=local, delay=10,
delays=0.08/0/0/10, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced (command line usage
error. Command output: Fatal: Missing -d argument )
See: http://www.postfix.com/postconf.5.html#mailbox_command
If you still cannot get it to work, I would suggest asking on the
Postfix forum since it is issuing the error message.
Jerry,
Perfect. I was looking for $USER, not $RECIPIENT.
Thank you both for your help.
Best Regards,
Camron
--
Camron W. Fox
Hilo Office
High Performance Computing Group
Fujitsu Management Services of America, Inc.
E-mail: cw...@us.fujitsu.com
[Dovecot] Can quota_rule be inherited by child mailboxes?
Is there a way to make quota_rule apply to subfolders? I've got some symlinked mailboxes which I want to exclude from quotas. This would work, but is verbose: quota_rule6 = USERS.aaa:ignore quota_rule7 = USERS.bbb:ignore ... quota_rule = USERS.zzz:ignore But simply writing this: quota_rule7 = USERS:ignore doesn't apply to USERS.xxx and so on. The wiki says '*' isn't supported as a wildcard and frankly I'm struggling with the source code! Thanks in advance, Ian -- === Ian Crowther Tel: +44 845 4501626 Unit 108, 10th Avenue, IT Dept, ComtekFax: +44 845 4501627 Zone 3, Deeside Industrial Network Systems UK Ltd Park, CH5 2UA, Flintshire ===
[Dovecot] problem with folder creation
I am running dovecot 1.2.12 on Free BSD 8.1. We also have postfix and a version of squirrelmail for the UI. We are using MySql database to store the email account info. I wrote a script to insert about 100K users into mysql. Those accounts seem to work well and I'm able to see things like 'Drafts', 'Trash' and 'Sent'. Now I am working on code to create new accounts - one at a time. The accounts get created and I can send and receive email from them but when I go go Drafts, Sent or Trash I get an error that says: ERROR: Could not complete request. Query: SELECT INBOX.Drafts Reason Given: Mailbox doesn't exist: INBOX.Drafts When I go out and look at the mailbox folders for these users I only see cur, new, and tmp whereas on other accounts that work well I also see things like INBOX.Drafts etc. I have examined the sql that is inserting the accounts in bulk versus the one by one case and can not see any differences (other than a new mailbox name/password etc). Everything that I'm reading online indicates that Dovecot should just create these extra folders on the server and there is really nothing for either an admin or a user to do. Does anyone have any more information on this? Thanks in Advance John Watson
[Dovecot] Doveadm-Expunge v2.0.5
Hello Few questions regarding Doveadm-Expunge. 1. I have lazy expunge configure with this name space: .EXPUNGED Storage type: mdbox doveadm -Dv expunge -u u...@domain mailbox .EXPUNGED/* savedbefore 7d I get some interesting outputs. doveadm(u...@domain): Debug: expunge: box=.EXPUNGED/INBOX/mon uid=791 doveadm(u...@domain): Debug: expunge: box=.EXPUNGED/INBOX/mon uid=792 doveadm(u...@domain): Debug: expunge: box=.EXPUNGED/INBOX/mon uid=793 doveadm(u...@domain): Info: expunge: box=INBOX/mon, uid=196, msgid=e1owjm4-j4...@domain, size=1856 doveadm(u...@domain): Info: expunge: box=INBOX/mon, uid=197, msgid=e1owjmp-pr...@domain, size=1756 doveadm(u...@domain): Info: expunge: box=INBOX/mon, uid=198, msgid=e1owjpp-0002hp...@domain, size=1810 doveadm(u...@domain): Info: expunge: box=INBOX/mon, uid=199, msgid=e1owjqw-0002y7...@domain, size=1766 doveadm(u...@domain): Info: expunge: box=INBOX/mon, uid=200, msgid=e1owjud-0004ba...@domain, size=1890 ... So what is the diff between Debug: expunge and Info: expunge. Anything done to Info: expunge? I am assuming the debug: expunge are the only entries with actions. And Info: expunge is not doing anything. I ran doveadm purge -u u...@domain after. I did not notice any missing emails. Sorry for the trivial question, I just want to make sure not mail would disappear, all of sudden. 1.A. Would not it be faster not to enumerate for large mailboxes (30-40GB - Maildir)? Is it possible to add a switch, to select single user expunge behavior? ref: http://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg32322.html 2. Also. expunge does not appear to remove empty mailboxes, is this a bug or intentional? If intentional, why? Any way to automated removal of empty mailboxes? Thank you KuiZ
