Re: [Dovecot] dovecot Digest, Vol 90, Issue 102
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 12:24 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: Alan Brown wrote: ATrpms has builds too, but they're usually out of date. Yeah way of of date. 1.0.7 I think is what I saw. Hm, ATrpms is usually shipping packages within a few days after a release as well as packages of beta releases. What makes you think ATrpms is at 1.0.7? FWIW ATrpms currently carries the following dovecot versions: 1.0.15-1_74 1.1.20-1_98 1.2.15-1_113 2.0.6-0_121 -- http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Dovecot] dovecot Digest, Vol 90, Issue 102
Axel Thimm wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 12:24 -0700, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: Alan Brown wrote: ATrpms has builds too, but they're usually out of date. Yeah way of of date. 1.0.7 I think is what I saw. Hm, ATrpms is usually shipping packages within a few days after a release as well as packages of beta releases. What makes you think ATrpms is at 1.0.7? I probably mis-read the YUM output. FWIW ATrpms currently carries the following dovecot versions: 1.0.15-1_74 1.1.20-1_98 1.2.15-1_113 2.0.6-0_121 Maybe I'm doing the YUM stuff wrong. When I disabled all the repos and enabled ATrpms I got no results. Better check that I'm using a good/current repo file. :-( \\||/ Rod --
Re: [Dovecot] dovecot Digest, Vol 90, Issue 102
Alan Brown wrote: From: Roderick A. Anderson raand...@cyber-office.net Subject: [Dovecot] RHEL5/CentOS5 YUM repo, rpm, or spec file for 2.0? I don't remember sing any mention come across the list reference the Subject line and nothing shows up within the first three pages of a Google search. Anyone know of a YUM repo. RPM or spec file for Dovecot 2.0 and friends? Try the following 2 URLs: http://www.city-fan.org/ftp/contrib/yum-repo/ http://www.city-fan.org/ftp/contrib/mail/ Thanks. That's a big help. ATrpms has builds too, but they're usually out of date. Yeah way of of date. 1.0.7 I think is what I saw. Again thanks, Rod --
