[Drakelist] R4C Hum and audio transistor

2012-10-31 Thread Max Cotton
I have a very nice R4C it had a hum with bad audio distortion so I decided to 
investigate, whilst taking it apart I noticed that if I touched the noise 
blanker the hum would alter, I removed the NB board and the hum was still 
there, I found eventually that the audio transistor had desoldered itself, do 
they really run that hot? so I resolded the wires, now the radio does not work 
anything like as well and has a high amount of white noise, has that audio 
transistor died and if so where do I get a new one, is there an equivalent for 
that power transistor?
73, Max M0GHQ___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R4C Hum and audio transistor

2012-10-31 Thread Paul Christensen
Max,

I'll get crucified for saying this, but that class A transistor stage was 
poorly designed -- and I think we can dispense with the but they didn't have 
cost-effective transistor technology back thirty years ago as an excuse.  A 
two-transistor complementary-symmetry PP pair running class AB and a moderate 
amount of negative feedback would have sounded substantially better, and 
produced much less heat.  

As an example, look at the Marantz, Sansui, Kenwood, and other mid-fi Japanese 
audio amplifiers being produced during the same period.  Those designs, or a 
variant, could easily have been leveraged into the R-4C.  Eliminate the audio 
output transformer and tap the symmetry pair mid-point, then couple with 500+ 
uF of series coupling C.  I don't know what Drake's cost was for the audio 
output transformer, but I have to believe the production cost difference 
between the transformer and an extra audio output transistor, and surrounding 
passive parts would have been reasonably minimal.

I jettisoned the R-4C AF stage after the volume control and won't be going back.
 
Paul, W9AC
  - Original Message - 
  From: Max Cotton 
  To: drakelist@zerobeat.net 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 2:10 PM
  Subject: [Drakelist] R4C Hum and audio transistor


  I have a very nice R4C it had a hum with bad audio distortion so I decided to 
investigate, whilst taking it apart I noticed that if I touched the noise 
blanker the hum would alter, I removed the NB board and the hum was still 
there, I found eventually that the audio transistor had desoldered itself, do 
they really run that hot? so I resolded the wires, now the radio does not work 
anything like as well and has a high amount of white noise, has that audio 
transistor died and if so where do I get a new one, is there an equivalent for 
that power transistor?
  73, Max M0GHQ


--


  ___
  Drakelist mailing list
  Drakelist@zerobeat.net
  http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R4C Hum and audio transistor

2012-10-31 Thread Paul Christensen
I tried one, but to my ears, there's too much hiss with some high-end 
headphones with the AF control at low settings and even full CCW.  I've tried 
the LM383, LM380, and TDA2002.  The hiss can be reduced with an in-line 
attenuator, then running the AF control at a higher level to compensate.  I 
would rather just deal with the root issue and solve it.

Paul, W9AC
  - Original Message - 
  From: kc9...@aol.com 
  To: w...@arrl.net ; drakelist@zerobeat.net 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 2:39 PM
  Subject: Re: [Drakelist] R4C Hum and audio transistor


  Why not install a Sherwood audio kit ...I have one in mine..works FB
  73,
  Lee

  -Original Message-
  From: Paul Christensen w...@arrl.net
  To: drakelist drakelist@zerobeat.net
  Sent: Wed, Oct 31, 2012 2:37 pm
  Subject: Re: [Drakelist] R4C Hum and audio transistor


  Max,

  I'll get crucified for saying this, but that class A transistor stage was 
poorly designed -- and I think we can dispense with the but they didn't have 
cost-effective transistor technology back thirty years ago as an excuse.  A 
two-transistor complementary-symmetry PP pair running class AB and a moderate 
amount of negative feedback would have sounded substantially better, and 
produced much less heat.  

  As an example, look at the Marantz, Sansui, Kenwood, and other mid-fi 
Japanese audio amplifiers being produced during the same period.  Those 
designs, or a variant, could easily have been leveraged into the R-4C.  
Eliminate the audio output transformer and tap the symmetry pair mid-point, 
then couple with 500+ uF of series coupling C.  I don't know what Drake's cost 
was for the audio output transformer, but I have to believe the production cost 
difference between the transformer and an extra audio output transistor, and 
surrounding passive parts would have been reasonably minimal.

  I jettisoned the R-4C AF stage after the volume control and won't be going 
back.

  Paul, W9AC
- Original Message - 
From: Max Cotton 
To: drakelist@zerobeat.net 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 2:10 PM
Subject: [Drakelist] R4C Hum and audio transistor


I have a very nice R4C it had a hum with bad audio distortion so I decided 
to investigate, whilst taking it apart I noticed that if I touched the noise 
blanker the hum would alter, I removed the NB board and the hum was still 
there, I found eventually that the audio transistor had desoldered itself, do 
they really run that hot? so I resolded the wires, now the radio does not work 
anything like as well and has a high amount of white noise, has that audio 
transistor died and if so where do I get a new one, is there an equivalent for 
that power transistor?
73, Max M0GHQ



___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist

___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R4C Hum and audio transistor

2012-10-31 Thread Max Cotton
I must admit this receiver will probably benefit from the Sherwood audio board, 
however comparing both my R4C's one is perfect with no hum and very good audio 
whilst this one is shushy and has bad hum, maybe the main caps need replacing 
but when I couple another cap accross them no change so I am a little reluctant 
to ditch them quite yet. swapping the tubes between each made no difference 
either. It does do an odd thing though, gradually as it warms up the audio and 
signal gets worse until it is distorted and with a lot of white noise. When 
switched on, the hum is really bad immediately and does not go away. both 
receivers are 26000 serials within about 700 from each other.
Ideas? 
73 Max
M0GHQ___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R4C Hum and audio transistor

2012-10-31 Thread Richard Knoppow


- Original Message - 
From: Max Cotton airra...@dsl.pipex.com

To: drakelist@zerobeat.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 11:10 AM
Subject: [Drakelist] R4C Hum and audio transistor


I have a very nice R4C it had a hum with bad audio 
distortion so I decided to investigate, whilst taking it 
apart I noticed that if I touched the noise blanker the hum 
would alter, I removed the NB board and the hum was still 
there, I found eventually that the audio transistor had 
desoldered itself, do they really run that hot? so I 
resolded the wires, now the radio does not work anything 
like as well and has a high amount of white noise, has that 
audio transistor died and if so where do I get a new one, is 
there an equivalent for that power transistor?

73, Max M0GHQ
   Which transistor desoldered itself?  Its possible it was 
overdriven because the bias was wrong.  The three 
transistors in the audio amp are direct coupled so a problem 
with any of them will affect all.


   Check the power supply voltages and the amount of ripple 
on each. While a scope is the best tool for looking at 
ripple any AC voltmeter capable of reading perhaps ten 
percent of the DC voltage will do. Distortion is likely if 
one or more of the transistors is bad.  Check the caps 
around the audio amp. You will have to check them for 
leakage rather than ESR.  You will probably have to 
substitute them.


   Unfortunately, the only schematic I have for the C is 
from BAMA and is so low res that I can't even read the 
voltages or part designators.





--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
dickb...@ix.netcom.com


___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist


Re: [Drakelist] R4C Hum and audio transistor

2012-10-31 Thread Bert Almemo
Hi Max,
 
I replaced the original audio amp in the R4C with a Velleman audio kit board
with an TDA2003. The Velleman kit # K4001. I believe I paid around $ 15.00.
Works great. 
 
If you're interested I can send you pics.
 
73 Bert, VE3NR
 
 

  _  

From: drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net [mailto:drakelist-boun...@zerobeat.net]
On Behalf Of Max Cotton
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 3:12 PM
To: drakelist@zerobeat.net
Subject: Re: [Drakelist] R4C Hum and audio transistor


I must admit this receiver will probably benefit from the Sherwood audio
board, however comparing both my R4C's one is perfect with no hum and very
good audio whilst this one is shushy and has bad hum, maybe the main caps
need replacing but when I couple another cap accross them no change so I am
a little reluctant to ditch them quite yet. swapping the tubes between each
made no difference either. It does do an odd thing though, gradually as it
warms up the audio and signal gets worse until it is distorted and with a
lot of white noise. When switched on, the hum is really bad immediately and
does not go away. both receivers are 26000 serials within about 700 from
each other.
Ideas? 
73 Max
M0GHQ
___
Drakelist mailing list
Drakelist@zerobeat.net
http://mailman.zerobeat.net/mailman/listinfo/drakelist