On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:28:35AM +, Webshet, Sisay (ILRI) wrote:
Dsapce 3.1/xmlui version.so far we are using 'dc.element.qualifier' format in
order to create dspace fields.
Many sites have done this. We should not have. Dublin Core is
defined by DCMI and the rest of us shouldn't be changing it.
Is there a problem if I replace the term'dc' with some other term cg to
form 'cg.element.qualifier'
No, that is what *should* be done when a site needs to extend the
metadata model. But it is a bit more work.
You need to create a new metadata namespace. (DSpace calls this a
schema, but this use of the term is disputed.) On the page listing
metadata namespaces you'll need to Add a new schema. Your local
schema will need a unique namespace URI, but it does not need to
resolve to any document. You can use cg for the name. Once this is
completed, your new namespace should appear above in the metadata
registry. Select it as you would dc and define the fields you need.
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu
Machines should not be friendly. Machines should be obedient.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev___
DSpace-tech mailing list
DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
