Re: [DVDnav-discuss] [FFmpeg-devel] New Server
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:35:11PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 07:06:02PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi all as you all probably know FFmpeg/Mplayer/... is searching for a new free server hosting ... We received the following offers for a new server and hosting. If you think any of them are a bad choice then please speak now! i ommited one non free offer and one unspecific offer from a company who alternatively would want to finnancially sponsor us. as well as at least one which would be technically insufficient If i forgot some offer or theres a mistake in the list below please reply and add/correct the offer ASAP! I also intend to add a mention link to the footer of the FFmpeg webpage for whoever is choosen, several of the sponsors below did not ask for that though. If you object to that, again, please speak now. I intend to accept 2 of the offers below for redundancy, again if you think something else should be done, speak now! I almost forgot replying. And i guess if i dont reply noone will feel authorative and reply anytime soon ... there are only 2 options noone had a argument against. OVH and vlc had arguments in public, hetzner (virus issue 50euro/mo, also public) kierans box is too weak/old to host all our services but works fine for trac atm against nexcess / futurehosting.com i receved a private argument from a rtmpdump developer, as they are US based and hosting rtmpdump in the US is expected by them to be problematic. That leaves DreamHack and the Telepoint/MediaHub offer. I thus accept these 2 offers to keep everyone updated the hw for the Telepoint/MediaHub server has been ordered a week ago, there was some problem with the avalability of the CPU, so we will likely have only one CPU at first until a second is in stock No news about the DreamHack server [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I know you won't believe me, but the highest form of Human Excellence is to question oneself and others. -- Socrates signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ DVDnav-discuss mailing list DVDnav-discuss@mplayerhq.hu https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss
Re: [DVDnav-discuss] [FFmpeg-devel] New Server
Hi On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 07:03:37PM +0200, Antonio Guillermo Martínez Largo wrote: Hi All, We're the proposer of the OVH option. Of course the project people should select the best options but for me is difficult to argue that the option we propose is not one of the best. Our offer is a 2 years prepaid high end server under the administrative and tech management of the ffmpeg community (the contact for the server will be person you decide, with no relation with our company except 3.000 euros prepaid transfer we'll do). The server would be hosted in a top 5 provider in europe (may be top 1/2 for dedicated servers, nº 3 hosting provider in the world according netcraft in Jan 2014, 700.000 customers today) with 100% uptime for their site since two years (0 outages since April 2013). For us is difficult to understand it's discarded based on some not-so-conclusive test (also not applied over the other options in the same way). In any case, our offer is still alive next week if you think it twice. I just picked the 2 which had noone saying anything against, we had several more offers than what we need. And several more great offers than what we need. but maybe theres a way to still make everyone happy ? If you wish to help/contribute, you could donate to FFmpeg,MPlayer, RTMPDump or DVDNav and the specific project could setup a sponsor page or something maybe reynaldo (in cc) i think wanted to suggest such a sponsor page for FFmpeg in a different context already ... or maybe someone of the admins sees a use for another server ? [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The real ebay dictionary, page 2 100% positive feedback - All either got their money back or didnt complain Best seller ever, very honest - Seller refunded buyer after failed scam signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ DVDnav-discuss mailing list DVDnav-discuss@mplayerhq.hu https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss
Re: [DVDnav-discuss] [FFmpeg-devel] New Server
Hi All, We're the proposer of the OVH option. Of course the project people should select the best options but for me is difficult to argue that the option we propose is not one of the best. Our offer is a 2 years prepaid high end server under the administrative and tech management of the ffmpeg community (the contact for the server will be person you decide, with no relation with our company except 3.000 euros prepaid transfer we'll do). The server would be hosted in a top 5 provider in europe (may be top 1/2 for dedicated servers, nº 3 hosting provider in the world according netcraft in Jan 2014, 700.000 customers today) with 100% uptime for their site since two years (0 outages since April 2013). For us is difficult to understand it's discarded based on some not-so-conclusive test (also not applied over the other options in the same way). In any case, our offer is still alive next week if you think it twice. Best regards, AG. Antonio Guillermo Martínez Largo Libnova, SL Paseo de la Castellana, 153 - Madrid [t] +34 91 449 08 94 [f] +34 91 141 21 21 www.libnova.es -Mensaje original- De: Michael Niedermayer [mailto:mich...@niedermayer.cc] Enviado el: viernes, 31 de julio de 2015 17:35 Para: FFmpeg development discussions and patches; mplayer-dev-...@mplayerhq.hu; rtmpd...@mplayerhq.hu; dvdnav-discuss@mplayerhq.hu CC: Antonio Guillermo Martínez (libnova); Joshua Ward; Nikolay Aleksandrov; Markus Viitamäki Asunto: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] New Server On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 07:06:02PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: Hi all as you all probably know FFmpeg/Mplayer/... is searching for a new free server hosting ... We received the following offers for a new server and hosting. If you think any of them are a bad choice then please speak now! i ommited one non free offer and one unspecific offer from a company who alternatively would want to finnancially sponsor us. as well as at least one which would be technically insufficient If i forgot some offer or theres a mistake in the list below please reply and add/correct the offer ASAP! I also intend to add a mention link to the footer of the FFmpeg webpage for whoever is choosen, several of the sponsors below did not ask for that though. If you object to that, again, please speak now. I intend to accept 2 of the offers below for redundancy, again if you think something else should be done, speak now! I almost forgot replying. And i guess if i dont reply noone will feel authorative and reply anytime soon ... there are only 2 options noone had a argument against. OVH and vlc had arguments in public, hetzner (virus issue 50euro/mo, also public) kierans box is too weak/old to host all our services but works fine for trac atm against nexcess / futurehosting.com i receved a private argument from a rtmpdump developer, as they are US based and hosting rtmpdump in the US is expected by them to be problematic. That leaves DreamHack and the Telepoint/MediaHub offer. I thus accept these 2 offers Thanks alot ! [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB The greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend to be. -- Socrates ___ DVDnav-discuss mailing list DVDnav-discuss@mplayerhq.hu https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/dvdnav-discuss
