[DX-NEWS] ARLP013 Propagation de K7RA

2004-03-26 Thread W1AW
SB PROP @ ARL $ARLP013
ARLP013 Propagation de K7RA

ZCZC AP13
QST de W1AW  
Propagation Forecast Bulletin 13  ARLP013
From Tad Cook, K7RA
Seattle, WA  March 26, 2004
To all radio amateurs 

SB PROP ARL ARLP013
ARLP013 Propagation de K7RA

Solar flux and sunspot numbers rose this week, and geomagnetic K and
A indices were down. This is a perfect combination for the first
days of spring. HF operators always love to see the K index lower
than 3 and the A index below 10. There is nothing magic about those
numbers, but lower numbers are better, and those are below the
values (about K=3 and A=15) that we think of for unsettled
conditions.

For quiet conditions, it's hard to beat this last Wednesday, March
24, when the mid-latitude K index was 0 for most of the reporting
periods. With sunspot numbers rising amid quiet geomagnetic
conditions, the springtime propagation over the past week has been
fantastic.

Average daily sunspot numbers rose nearly 27 points to 92.7 this
week (compared to last). The average daily planetary A index dropped
nearly 7 points to 8.7. Sunspot numbers and solar flux are rising,
and the predicted solar flux for this weekend, March 26-28 is 130,
135 and 130. This may be due to a pair of large sunspots emerging
over the sun's northeastern limb.

But early spring is also a time when auroras are more intense, which
of course is an indicator of elevated geomagnetic activity. This
weekend is the CQ World Wide WPX SSB Contest, and the outlook for
the next few days is good, with some active conditions probably
returning around March 29-30.

A bulletin received earlier today from the Australian Government IPS
Radio and Space Services warns that there may be rising geomagnetic
activity this Saturday, March 27 due to solar wind from a coronal
hole. One good daily resource for updates on solar wind streams is
http://spaceweather.com/.

Mark Dullea of Peabody, Massachusetts asked for a good source of
daily Ap readings (planetary A index). The place to go is the NOAA
Space Environment Center at
http://www.sec.noaa.gov/ftpdir/indices/DGD.txt.  This is also a good
resource for comparing the daily variations in mid-latitude,
high-latitude and planetary geomagnetic indices mentioned in the
first paragraph.

Tony Salvate, N1TKS of Greenwich, Connecticut wrote for any thoughts
regarding a friend who is going fishing about 150 miles south of the
Arctic Circle in Northwest Canada this summer. He will be packing HF
gear along with a solar panel and batteries, and Tony wonders about
propagation to the Northeast United States. I noted that being so
far north, propagation will be strongly affected by geomagnetic
conditions, so hope for a K index lower than 3.

I also suggested calculating some paths with W6ELprop, the free
propagation prediction program from http://www.qsl.net/w6elprop/. I
ran some projections for the end of June from Rae Lakes, Northwest
Territories (which is roughly the area Tony described) to Tony's
location and found some good possibilities for 40, 30 and 20 meters.

Users of Scott Craig's Solar Data Plotting Utility may or may not
have noticed a leap year error a few weeks ago. If you look at the
data file, February 29 is not there. Open the graph.dat file with a
text editor such as Windows Notepad, and insert 81 for sunspot
number and 110.0 for solar flux for the 29th.

If you haven't used Scott's program, you can download it from the
WA4TTK web site at http://www.craigcentral.com/sol.asp. This program
automatically sucks up the data from the end of each of these
bulletins and displays it in a nice graph running from January 1,
1989.

For more information concerning propagation and an explanation of
the numbers used in this bulletin see the Propagation page on the
ARRL Web site at http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/propagation.html.

Sunspot numbers for March 18 through 24 were 107, 89, 82, 65, 87,
110 and 109 with a mean of 92.7. 10.7 cm flux was 115.4, 112.2,
113.6, 111.2, 116.4, 118.3 and 119.7, with a mean of 115.3.
Estimated planetary A indices were 10, 6, 9, 13, 11, 8 and 4, with a
mean of 8.7.

/EX


--
To post a message the subject must begin with [:dx-news:]
(all lower case) and sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems, etc 
DX-NEWS  http://njdxa.org/dx-news
DX-CHAT: http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

Archives  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


[DX-NEWS] GACW DX CONTEST

2004-03-26 Thread Steve-KF2TI

Hi!
We want to remember that our World Wide DX Contest will be held
during
the third weekend of april (April 17/18, 2004), and You can take a
look in our website: http://gacw.no-ip.org for full rules. Also, we
will be glad if You can spread this information with Your
friends/club/group/list/etc. Many thanks for Your help and support,
and see You in the Contest

73 de Raúl/LU6EF
GACW Coordinator
http://gacw.no-ip.org









-
 ¿Buscás un auto?
Encontralo en Yahoo! Autos
¡Más de 4000 clasificados todos los días!
Usados - 0 km - Vendé el tuyo
--- End of forwarded message ---

--
To post a message the subject must begin with [:dx-news:]
(all lower case) and sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Archives  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--


Fw: [DX-NEWS] BPL and HOA's

2004-03-26 Thread Paul Playford

- Original Message - 
From: Paul Playford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CADXA [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; DX-NEWS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 1:15 AM
Subject: Re: [DX-NEWS] BPL and HOA's


 When BPL is placed on a power line, that power line becomes an antenna - a
 receiving and transmitting antenna no less.

 While it is true that many areas where HOA's are present have underground
 utilities, many do not.  Further, the last time I looked even underground
 power distribution systems utilized above ground transformers.

 The last time I read CCR's that prohibited antennas they just said
outdoor
 antennas, which encouraged the FCC to exclude the smaller satellite
dishes
 from those CCR's prohibitions.

 Now, unless the power companies can bring all of their power lines
indoors,
 that will mean they will violate CCR's that prohibit outdoor antennas.

 And last time I checked in Arizona, selective enforcement of CCR's is not
 legal,  It's all or nothing.

 I have my antenna farm on 2 1/2 acres that do not have CCR's so I could
not
 possibly care less, but it is fun to think about anyway.

 de Paul, W8AEF

 ---
 ZF2TA  ZF2JI FO8DX  FO0PLA  8Q7AA  XZ0A
 ---
 - Original Message - 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Paul Playford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 12:12 AM
 Subject: Re: [DX-NEWS] BPL and HOA's


  On the contrary, I don't believe that HOA's would have a problem with
BPL.
 
  Let's face it, there are three primary reasons that CCR's and/or HOA's
  prohibit antennas:
  (1)  They don't like the aesthetics, ie, the look of them
  (2)  They don't want any interference problems
  (3)  The builder's boilerplate CCR's automatically exclude antennas, so
  they have little or no incentive to go against that.
 
  None of these are affected by BPL.  Yes, WE have a strong probability of
  an interference problem, but that's about it.  And I don't think the
  affects on broadcast services will make an impact... most people won't
  notice the extra noise on the AM broadcast band, nor will they make the
  connection between the higher noise level and BPL.
 
  73, ron wn3vaw
 
   It seems to me that homeowners associations and their CCR's that
 prohibit
   outdoor antennas would preclude BPL in their areas.
  
   Or would the presence of BPL in an antenna restricted development open
 the
   door for amateur antennas?
  
   Inquiring minds want to know.  tnx Dean
  
  
   de Paul, W8AEF
  
   ---
   ZF2TA  ZF2JI FO8DX  FO0PLA  8Q7AA  XZ0A
   ---
 


--
To post a message the subject must begin with [:dx-news:]
(all lower case) and sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Archives  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--