[Dx4win] Windows ME and LPT CW Keyeing

2002-01-29 Thread Dave Edwards
First would be to go back to WIN98SE...that is what I ended up doing.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Dave Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:15 PM
Subject: [Dx4win] Windows ME and LPT CW Keyeing


 I just upgraded(?) the computer here in the shack to Windows ME from
WIN98SE. I

 n the process my parallel ports no longer will CW key the radio? they work
 fine under WIN98 ( dual boot)...Any hints?

 Dave
 NR1DX


 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win




[Dx4win] death to labels

2002-01-27 Thread Dave Edwards
Larry... I have been down this road before.
I wanted to print the QSL report on the left hand side of the back of my
QSL cards.
I actually tried 3 differant logging programs 'till I found one I could do
it with.
By the way... What laser printer do you have? I have an HP LJ 6P, and it
feeds the
QSL's just fine. You want to change the paper path so it does not have curl
around the roller. Have it feed from the front, and exit from the rear.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Larry Gauthier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] death to labels


 Ed,

 I am also VERY interested in printing directly to cards - and in fact am
 prepared to re-design my cards to accommodate the output peculiarities of
 DX4Win. But, also like you, have not figured out how to do this yet.

 Furthermore, I have determined that my HP Laser printer does not like
 standard US (5 1/2 by 3 1/4) QSL card sizes - the feeding mechanisms
 will not pass them. The smallest paper I can reliably feed through my
 envelope tray (which is how I have assumed I would be feeding cards...) is
 about the size of a Number 6 3/4 envelope (6 1/2 by 3 5/8). But, if I
 can avoid this ugly intermediate step of printing to labels and then
 transferring labels to cards, I will also order slightly-larger QSL card
 stock when I order the design that DX4WIN will print on.

 The bottom line is: if you need a buddy or a committee member or whatever
as
 you figure out how to do this... let me know.

 FINALLY: regarding printing to labels within a sheet - DX4WIN includes a
 very handy feature when you print labels, titled missing labels. If you
 have a sheet of 30 5160 labels, and you have already used 12, indicate
that
 there are 12 missing labels and DX4WIN will begin printing at position
13
 on the label stock. Without a doubt, DX4WIN does a great job when you want
 to print labels... but not such a good job when you don't ;-(

 -larry
 K8UT
 - Original Message -
 From: Ed Himwich N3HXQ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Dx4win dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 10:08 AM
 Subject: [Dx4win] death to labels


  I am interested in printing directly on QSL cards to avoid the use of
 labels
  as much as possible. I have looked a bit at the help file, but haven't
 found
  anything that indicates how this might be done. My best guess is that it
  would be a custom label, but I don't see anyway to arrange the
information
  so that it will appear in the correct locations to match the boxes on
QSL
  cards.
 
  Another issue is that it there would need to be a way to suppress the
  printing of addresses for direct QSL cards so that they aren't printed
 onto
  cards. However, it would still be good to print the address labels,
maybe
  there could be an option to print just the QSLs that have addresses on
 label
  stock. The printed QSL labels could be used to match the address labels
to
  the cards.
 
  Last, but not least: Is there a way to start printing in the middle of a
  partially used sheet of labels?
 
  73, Ed N3HXQ
 
  ___
  Dx4win mailing list
  Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 

 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win




[Dx4win] New Computer - Which Windows to use?

2001-12-31 Thread Dave Edwards
Well, my oppinion would be that WIN98SE would be the most assured, but the
others are newer and have newer features. I have read too much regarding
problems with the newer op sys.
...Dave
- Original Message -
From: Stan Staten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 5:50 PM
Subject: [Dx4win] New Computer - Which Windows to use?


 I am posting this to both Writelog and DX4WIN.  I am building an new AMD
 1500 system for use here in the shack.  There has been a lot of discussion
 of which operating systems work best or have problems (like LPT CW
 keying).  I am now faced with the choice of WIN98SE, WIN2K, WIN XP Pro and
 Home.  Which one should I use?  Looking for advice.  To conserve bandwidth
 it may be best to send any thoughts or suggestions you may have directly
to
 me rather than posting it.

 Thanks in advance  73
 Stan, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win