[e-gold-list] Re: banks spends ... yes in Oz!

2001-02-04 Thread David Hillary

Michael Moore wrote:
 
  I just checked the fee schedule too cost just 25 c using online banking.
  David Hillary
 
 Heaps cheaper than wired funds or even cheques.

Commonwealth bank fees are even cheaper at just 20c for such
transactions.  St George is also 20c. National Australia Bank fees are
not available online. They don't even have a 24/7 telephone service for
sales/service enquiries! (Neither does the commonwealth, Westpac does).
 
 The sooner the US  banks start with the online the happier I will be but I
 won't hold my breath.
 
 Actually as an MM I have some major expansion plans underway  that will
 alleaviate much of the problems for both Aussies and US citizens.  You can
 expect some big changes and faster easier transaction methods that are
 secure and stable coming up in a week or two.
 
 Stay Tuned!!
 
 Kind regards,
 
 Michael Moore
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.gold-today.com
 Sign up with e-gold today and get grams of e-gold here.
 https://www.e-gold.com/newacct/newaccount.asp?cid=129542
 subscribe to the gold-today discussion group at
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/goldtoday
 
 ---
 You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] Re: hard for soft

2001-02-04 Thread James H. Cloos Jr.

 "David" == David Hillary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

David why can I go to any ATM, insert my credit card and get my
David "available balance" as cash? ...  I can get the hardest form of
David money with the softest and instantly.

repudiation rules (and fees, interest, etc) for cash advances are
different than for purchases.  And if you did try to repudiate, I'm
sure the bank would grab the surveillance video and seriously look at
bringing fraud charges.  (At least over here; rest of the world may be
less inclined to look to the courts... :)

A cc ca would not be as soft as a cc purchase on jp's scale.

-JimC
-- 
James H. Cloos, Jr.  http://jhcloos.com/public_key 1024D/ED7DAEA6 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B  63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] Could it be? (was Re: banks spends ... yes in Oz!

2001-02-04 Thread George Matyjewicz

At 05:09 PM 2/4/2001 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marvellous!  It sounds like many Aussie banks have a "spend" feature.

I wonder if it's because Dr. Elwyn Jenkins and Loryn Jenkins (SRs 
founder and CTO respectively) were the ones who architected the 
Australian banks move to the Internet, long before it was even a 
twinkle in the eye of US banks?

George
__
George Matyjewicz,  Chief Executive Officer
Standard Reserve Corp. -- Atlanta, GA
World Wide Currency for the World Wide Web
http://www.standardreserve.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] RE: Could it be? (was Re: banks spends ... yes in Oz!

2001-02-04 Thread Elwyn Jenkins

Got Quite a bit to do with that I think. Certainly we pre-prepared them for
the Internet age and pushed them into thinking the way of the Internet at
highest board level over the years 1994-6. We also delivered to St George,
Commonwealth and I had consulting jobs with ANZ Australia and NZ as well as
National Australia Bank. Westpac was always competing with the others and
emulating what we did. Essentially their Internet stratgegies stem from that
period.

ej
++


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of George
Matyjewicz
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 9:52 AM
To: e-gold Discussion
Subject: [e-gold-list] Could it be? (was Re: banks "spends" ... yes in
Oz!


At 05:09 PM 2/4/2001 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marvellous!  It sounds like many Aussie banks have a "spend" feature.

I wonder if it's because Dr. Elwyn Jenkins and Loryn Jenkins (SRs
founder and CTO respectively) were the ones who architected the
Australian banks move to the Internet, long before it was even a
twinkle in the eye of US banks?

George
__
George Matyjewicz,  Chief Executive Officer
Standard Reserve Corp. -- Atlanta, GA
World Wide Currency for the World Wide Web
http://www.standardreserve.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] E-gold pay to surf

2001-02-04 Thread lslarry

Does anyone know if there are 'paid to surf' programs that pay in e-gold?

Thanks in advance
Patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] Re: Ultimate funding system

2001-02-04 Thread James M. Ray

At 5:31 PM -0500 2/3/01, Elwyn Jenkins wrote:
...
 
Someone ought to do/flesh out a piece describing how Bertelsmann/Napster
is going to screw up crash and burn if it attempts to become a for-pay
service and fails to accept AUG.


Well, Elwyn, I'd be glad to, but I say all the good rants have mostly
been written, at the following URLs. 

First, What's Wrong With Content Protection 

http://cryptome.org/jg-wwwcp.htm  

is by cypherpunks cofounder (if it's possible to co-found an anarchy) 
John Gilmore. John was one of the original employees of Sun
Microsystems, and did a number of other things such as co-found EFF
(which now accepts e-gold, and is still a worthy cause!) John can
turn a phrase, for example: "What is wrong is that we have invented 
the technology to eliminate scarcity, but we are deliberately throwing 
it away to benefit those who profit from scarcity."

Second, Courtney Love's Manifesto (first published in Salon long ago)

http://www.hole.com/speech/index.html

talks about how artists make (and don't make) money. By the way, if
any of you can help me with an artist I'd appreciate it. Anyway, if I
put both those rants together I see the gold economy smoothing out
many of the problems John and Courtney see.

...(good points)
 . So we are talking micropayments in the range of USD 0.05 - 0.25 
for a session, or monthly payments in the range of USD 5 - 10.


Not just that, they're basically buying into a __ V. Bertelsman/
Napster/et.al. lawsuit or 30, in exchange for MUCH less content in 
the end. Automatic recurring monthly payments are fine for some
things, but not for internet things. If I'm off on vacation for 2 weeks
I don't want to be billed for Napster during those 2 weeks, but I'm
ok with a monthly magazine billing me (well, actually I nag them to
accept e-gold whenever they bill me, but you knew that).

...free communities will again emerge, btw, in .org
competition with Napster].


Oh, it's already happening, with Gnutella being only one of the upstarts.

Gnutella will react just as another community, the remailer operators,
reacted to a lawsuit that exposed the records of an early, easy-to-use,
anonymous email service called anon-penet.fi. When Zimmerman was
attacked for producing strong cryptography, many of us gave time and
money to the issue. Now there is tremendous (and hopefully-growing) 
support for 2600 magazine's Eric Corley (AKA "Emmanuel Goldstein,"
and an *excellent* journalist IMO) in a DVD case, see 

http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/MPAA_DVD_cases/20010119_ny_eff_appeal_pressrel.html 

for more, and if you want to help EFF then JOIN and click them some
gold, NOW! There's a lot to do, IMO. Anyway, from all these examples
and others, one could paraphrase John Gilmore's (in)famous quote re
censorship to say:  "the internet treats content control as damage and
routes around it." Napster will have to "think outside the box" to take
away the advantages of services that will always remain free, and will
ultimately be technologically-unstoppable-FROM being free, IMO. The
legal profession is about to learn a very harsh clue-lesson about this,
and finally the law in question will be modified or struck down (IANAL,
but that's what I think will finally happen).

Napster should (but probably won't) admit that music is soon largely
going to be paid for with tips. The interesting thing is, if you read Love's
essay, tips might be FAR better money than even top-shelf musicians
are getting right now from the record companies. (Hopefully my buddy
Melissa Foxx will help us in this area, but it's slow going!) Musicians,
rather than giant corp.s like Seagrams, Sony, Bertelsman, etc. would
seem to be our natural allies (permission to forward this to any actual
musician you know is hereby granted!). 

If enough musicians noticed us, Napster would have to notice the gold
economy. I agree that they're likely to eventually crash and burn if 
they don't accept sound money at least as a choice, but it may take a
while for their shareholders to get fed up (look at Amazon). That's why
I'm such a fan of http://www.fairtunes.com/ (which will hopefully soon
notice 2cw is the best way to pay musicians). We can go right around
the major companies and appeal directly to those we can help more. 

Thanks for reading. http://2cw.org/jmr gives my foundation 2cw. :)
JMR

(Still thrilled to death about the prospect of gold-chess.)


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] Suggested use for the JP May money hardness scale

2001-02-04 Thread Jeff Fitzmyers

I would suggest e-gold and market makers post something like this on
their sites.
http://home.earthlink.net/~fitz22/may.html  (-- Please send me
suggestions and I am thinking about a column for pros and cons.)

Why? To manage other's expectations and educate them. Having a
comparison of what's going on gives people confidence.

Also, since the current main issue seems to be the wait to get money
into an account, just educate clients that: (modified from JP May's
post)

"Keep in mind that funding a new BANK ACCOUNT is just as difficult as
buying e-gold.
When you open a stock brokering account at etrade or whatever, you
certainly cannot get funds there instantly  --  your options are wire
and wait days, bank check or cashier's check and wait a week or a
personal check and wait a couple of weeks.

My market maker company is just like these other types of firms: we have
to wait for the money to positively clear before we can fund your
account."

We are linking something unfamiliar with something familiar. (I think it
is called 'normalizing'. Since we basically make one to one contact with
new e-golders, we might as well educate them while we are at it.

jf




---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] Re: Ultimate funding system

2001-02-04 Thread Michael Moore

I am working on this as one of my projects.

An initial press release has been written and sent off (Ask George he has
it) and, whenI have complete writing the KSP book  I will start on it.
Kind regards,

Michael Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gold-today.com

- Original Message -
From: "Elwyn" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "e-gold Discussion" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 3:20 AM
Subject: [e-gold-list] Re: Ultimate funding system



  Well, Elwyn, I'd be glad to, but I say all the good rants have mostly
  been written, at the following URLs.


 But another rant should be written explaining how e-gold could save them!!
 Pulling from all the other stuff that has been written to build a case for
 E-Gold as the way to make them work.

 ej
 ++


 ---
 You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] Re: Ultimate funding system

2001-02-04 Thread Michael Moore

In all of this discussion thread regarding micro payment  there is one thing
I notice missing.

That is a damn good marketing agent who knows how to sell an idea or concept
to a commerical company and is prepared to go at it full steam.

This is or was how traditional concept were entered into the commercial
market place.

I think that if the case was presented to Napster style of companies, or any
business that wants to accept a micro payment,  in a professional marketing
style  you would achieve a more notable success.  It is not the product that
sells.  It is the sizzle.  Who is pointing out the benefits of micro gold
payments to these companies?

Our problem is that we do not have a concerted effort by e-gold SR MMs et
all contributing in the same manner as a large commercial company would to
produce a result.
i know there are  good marketing agents out there.  I bet Elwyn is one,
George another and heaps I have missed.  But Marketing is a full time job.
Quantity comes before quanity  and you have to talk to heaps of people or
companies to find one that will accept your concept.

I hope people are understanding what I say.  this could even call for a
advertising agency  to beef up our image in the mainstream.

Once the product is sold... I know the techies will move in and make it
happen.  But you gotta sell the idea first!

Kind regards,

Michael Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gold-today.com
Sign up with e-gold today and get grams of e-gold here.
https://www.e-gold.com/newacct/newaccount.asp?cid=129542
subscribe to the gold-today discussion group at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/goldtoday



 At 5:31 PM -0500 2/3/01, Elwyn Jenkins wrote:
 ...

 Someone ought to do/flesh out a piece describing how Bertelsmann/Napster
 is going to screw up crash and burn if it attempts to become a for-pay
 service and fails to accept AUG.



---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] The AUG Economy Infrastructure Portfolio

2001-02-04 Thread Bob

To celebrate the emergence of the AUG economy 
(AUG: grams of gold or gold grams),
Bearerinstruments.com is starting a portfolio 
of exchange traded companies that will build 
out a new type of required infrastructure for 
individuals and other types of businesses using 
e-metal money or e-metal backed money to function on.

Bob
-- 
http://www.bearerinstruments.com

 A Directory of Web sites and Internet 
  presences accepting non-fiat monies.

http://www.bearerinstruments.com/assets/BIMDsPGPkey.txt
650C 51DA 734F 697F 5706 3D6A 7712 BCC9 D1AE 00BA

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] RE: 2 cents url

2001-02-04 Thread Sidd

Hi Boyd,

It appears (if the URLs on your message are the ones you are using)
that you have indeed set them up slightly wrong. They should be as
follows if you wish to use SR:

http://www.two-cents-worth.com/?109406SR[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.two-cents-worth.com/?120895SR[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OR

http://2cw.org/109406SR[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://2cw.org/120895SR[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I apologise for the inconvenience and have changed the instructions
page so it is (hopefully) easier to read.

Regards,

Sidd.

-Original Message-
From: B Ray
When i tried to send some egold to my SR acct using the 2 cents worth
url, it never got there.  I suspect it ended up in someones egold acct
that may be the same number as my SR acct 120895.  Anyone know what i
did wrong or do i have the urls set up right.  I thought i followed
the instrusctions correctly on how to set them up, but i guess not.
Any help would be appreciated.
http://www.two-cents-worth.com/?109406[zz][EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.two-cents-worth.com/?120895[zz][EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] Two Cents worth gif

2001-02-04 Thread Sidd








Hi,



As
requested here is a gif that can be freely used where a link to the 2cw.org
site is used...



Enjoy.



Sidd.










 2cw_tiny.gif

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] Re: Could it be? (was Re: banks spends ... yes in Oz!

2001-02-04 Thread Graham Kelly

GM,
Are you saying that you guys had a major input into the designs of the
systems now operational within OZ? If so, you guys are bloody hero's!

Cheers!

Graham Kelly CEO
GoldNow Corporation http://www.GoldNow.St
Fax; +1(312)777-4270

Want a debit card linked to your e-gold account? Apply at my site!

https://www.standardreserve.com/acct/instant_anywhere_application.asp?CID=10

https://www.e-gold.com/newacct/newaccount.asp?cid=103346



 George Matyjewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 At 05:09 PM 2/4/2001 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Marvellous!  It sounds like many Aussie banks have a "spend" feature.
 
 I wonder if it's because Dr. Elwyn Jenkins and Loryn Jenkins (SRs 
 founder and CTO respectively) were the ones who architected the 
 Australian banks move to the Internet, long before it was even a 
 twinkle in the eye of US banks?
 
 George
 __
 George Matyjewicz,  Chief Executive Officer
 Standard Reserve Corp. -- Atlanta, GA
 World Wide Currency for the World Wide Web
 http://www.standardreserve.com
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ---
 You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] Re: Could it be? (was Re: banks spends ... yes in Oz!

2001-02-04 Thread George Matyjewicz

At 05:47 PM 2/4/2001 -0500, Graham Kelly wrote:
GM,
Are you saying that you guys had a major input into the designs of the
systems now operational within OZ? If so, you guys are bloody hero's!

Not me.  Only Elwyn and Loryn.  And, yes, they are bloody 
geniuses!   Combine that with Phylliss' expertise in finance and 
controls and my marketing expertise, and we may have some degree 
of success, eh?

Which is why I originally posed the question about ways of 
funding gold accounts and thinking outside the box.  If the 
Jenkins could help move a banking institution or two in OZ, then 
this should be a piece of cake ;-)

George
__
George Matyjewicz,  Chief Executive Officer
Standard Reserve Corp. -- Atlanta, GA
World Wide Currency for the World Wide Web
http://www.standardreserve.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] Re: Ultimate funding system

2001-02-04 Thread James M. Ray

At 7:18 AM +1100 2/5/01, Michael Moore wrote:
...
Once the product is sold... I know the techies will move in and make it
happen.  But you gotta sell the idea first!
...

Actually (and unlike other "dot com" companies) the reverse order has
been the tradition around these parts, and due to the skill of techies we
are blessed to have aboard, this product gets progressively easier to
sell. I was thinking about it the other day, e-gold's a _LOT_ cooler than
it was when I first found out about it. When I first heard about e-gold, I
had already seen Henry Hazlitt's writings on money, and e-gold was so
much like what I wanted that I refused to believe it could be true. It took
a friend to introduce e-gold to me, but back then there was very little I
could buy with it.

It's been my opinion/experience that it is very easy to waste money on
advertising. Further, e-gold can sometimes be a frustrating thing to
describe because there are so many benefits that affect different users
differently. Fortunately, we have some very smart folks around here
who are willing to offer their talents for free. I seriously doubt any ad
agency could come up with anything as good as "e-gold is to money
what email is to letters," for example. (Thanks JP!)
JMR


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] Re: Ultimate funding system

2001-02-04 Thread Khurram Khan

hello,

  Just putting my two cents in.  The ultimate funding system is a system that requires 
no funding.  For example, if an e-currency architecture included a bank some 
interesting things could happen.  If for example the SR-USD was an actual bank 
account, you could use it as your bank account and when you need SR-GOLD you simply do 
a conversion.

Khurram Khan

_
Get email for your site --- http://www.everyone.net

---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[e-gold-list] Re: Ultimate funding system

2001-02-04 Thread Michael Moore

. I seriously doubt any ad
 agency could come up with anything as good as "e-gold is to money
 what email is to letters," for example. (Thanks JP!)
 JMR

What about coke is it!  There are many slogans  that work.
In the UK years ago the word PINTA  was introduced,
'Drinka Pinta Milk Aday'.   Pinta is now in the English Dictionary.
There is also Hoover for Vacuum Cleaner and Fridge for Icebox.
And so it goes on.  I'm sure someone can think of more.  All the result of
Advertising.
I guarantee if you have a budget of a million dollars and a top
flight ad agency,  e-gold would be a household word befor the end of the
year.
It is not that advertising does not work.  Like many things it is the amount
of
work and effort and even money you are prepared to put into it that counts.

But I like James's  comment ..."e-gold is to money what email is to
letters."   That is
the kind of thinking we need to come up with.  Slogans that communicate to
the uninitiated. We need new blood.  the more we can do to introduce new
blood into our
economy the bigger better and more stable it will become  and that will
benefit all of us.

Kind regards,

Michael Moore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gold-today.com
Sign up with e-gold today and get grams of e-gold here.
https://www.e-gold.com/newacct/newaccount.asp?cid=129542
subscribe to the gold-today discussion group at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/goldtoday


---
You are currently subscribed to e-gold-list as: archive@jab.org
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]