[Elecraft] KPod and Digout1
Looks like the Kpod could be used to control Digout1 via the MP command in a macro. If so that would give another controllable output in addition to the three on the Kpod itself. That looks like it will be useful for my K3s station configuration. Trying to eliminate miscellaneous little boxes and consolidate on Kpod. 73 jim ab3cv __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
You have found the problem by now, but let me comment on some other areas. The only place in the KPA500 that is restricted is the US FCC-mandated CB frequencies of 26 to 28 MHz. If you really want to output 600 watts on 30 meters (as is allowed in some areas) go right ahead. It won’t operate below 1.6 MHz because of limitations in the frequency counter code (making sure the counter is functioning properly), and above 54 MHz it probably won’t do all that much as the 6m bandpass filter does its work. The KPA listens to the BAND0-3 inputs for band determination. It will change bands pretty much immediately on seeing those input signals change. It also counts the input frequency and will switch bands if the count shows a different band - and will ignore the band inputs to use that band until they change again. So even though it detected something other than the combination for 40 meters, it would have gone there on TX and stayed until you later changed bands. Lastly, what Don was referring to - pressing a band button on the KPA500, when the RADIO is set to K3, will send a request to the K3/K3S to go to that band. When the K3 responds by changing bands, it will output the proper combination on its BAND outputs, which will then cause the KPA to itself change bands. In other RADIO settings the KPA will immediately change bands, but not so with the K3 setting. Hope this helps. Those AUX cables can be pesky at times - make sure none of the pins are bent, and that everything is connecting properly. And, as we have said many times, do not use a VGA cable unless you are absolutely sure it is full 15-pin straight through, since most VGA cables connect several pins together as grounds. Me? I fabricated my own cables for my station, but then I have the facilities to do so… 73! Jack Brindle, W6FB > On Aug 7, 2016, at 5:21 PM, Dauer, Edwardwrote: > > I appreciate your having written, Cliff; and it is the case that 30 meters is > an oddball. Just as the K3 is booby-trapped to prevent transmitting out of > band, it could very well have been that adding 30 meters to the working bands > would have required some special consideration to keep the amp from violating > the power limitations. > > Thanks again, > > Ted, KN1CBR > > > On 8/7/16, 6:10 PM, "Cliff Frescura" wrote: > >I think I jumped the gun and was wrong. > >73, > >Cliff K3LL/6 > > > > > > > > > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to jackbrin...@me.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
I appreciate your having written, Cliff; and it is the case that 30 meters is an oddball. Just as the K3 is booby-trapped to prevent transmitting out of band, it could very well have been that adding 30 meters to the working bands would have required some special consideration to keep the amp from violating the power limitations. Thanks again, Ted, KN1CBR On 8/7/16, 6:10 PM, "Cliff Frescura"wrote: I think I jumped the gun and was wrong. 73, Cliff K3LL/6 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
Thanks, Don; that may have been the key. Even with all of the connectors tight there could be an intermittent fault in any one of them. There are four connectors and two cables linking the K3 with the amp through the KAT500 tuner, as well as the internal connections in the tuner. It could be that a random movement triggered the intermittency and that reseating them all moved the equivalent of the cat’s whisker back onto the sweet spot of the galena. I may just replace them all – or wait until the problem reappears and then do the Band0 line check to see where the fault lies. Thanks again for your thoughtful help . . . Ted, KN1CBR On 8/7/16, 6:07 PM, "Don Wilhelm"wrote: Ted, One other observation, it would appear that you are missing the BAND0 signal at the KPA500. Make sure the ACC connector on the K3 is tight as well as other end at the KPA500 (AUX cable). If you moved things around on the operating desk, it is possible that you incurred some cable damage - you should be able to do a continuity check on the BAND0 signal line in the cable. 73, Don W3FPR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
I think I jumped the gun and was wrong. 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Dauer, Edward [mailto:eda...@law.du.edu] Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 3:42 PM To: Cliff Frescura; elecraft@mailman.qth.net; brian Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking Thanks, Cliff. I am aware of the 30M 200W power limitation, but I don’t see why adding 30M to the K3’s Band Map would cause 40 meters and 10 meters to be in error. When the K3 is at 7.0 MHz the KPA500 switches to 3.5. When the K3 is at 28.0 MHz the KPA500 switches to 24.9. That never happened before today. Moreover the amp correctly senses 30M on the first dit and switches correctly, and seems very happy producing 200W or more on 30M. Brian, K3KO, suggested disconnecting the cable from the amp to see what the band buttons on the amp do. They work correctly with the cable disconnected, and they work correctly with the cable connected and the K3’s power off. 7.0 switches to 7.0, 28 switches to 28, and so forth. So what does that mean – that the fault lies in the K3? But before adding 30M to the Band map in the K3 changing bands worked for all of 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 – that is, changing the K3 band changed the KPA500 band correctly. Now it doesn’t work for 40 and 10, and 30; but it does for 80, 20 and 15. Since the only change that occurred was adding 30M to the band map, does that mean something is fouled up in the configuration? I did recycle the power to both the K3 and the KPA500 after making the configuration change. One other fact – pressing the 10MHz band button on the KPA500 correctly switches the K3 to 10MHz – but places the amp on 5.3 MHz. The amp then switches to 10 MHz with the first transmitted dit. But pressing the 10MHz band button on the amp when the K3 power is off changes the amp to 10 MHz. Appreciative and still perplexed, Ted, KN1CBR Edward A. Dauer, LL.B. M.P.H. Dean Emeritus and Professor Emeritus of Law University of Denver On 8/7/16, 4:19 PM, "Cliff Frescura"wrote: "But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly." ...it's by design. In the US the maximum power on 30m is 200W PEP. http://www.arrl.org/frequency-allocations 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dauer, Edward Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 2:50 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That is also exactly what I expected. But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. The frequency sampling, however, works perfectly. A single dit on any band switches the KPA500 to the correct band, as defined by the K3. The cables are all Elecraft issue. They are all connected correctly – witness that everything worked perfectly, on every band, until I added 30M into the K3’s band map. Because both the K3 auto tracking feature and the Band buttons on the KPA500 yield the same errors, I think I must have messed up something in the amp. I have, by the way, already RdTFM. Any ideas about what I might have done? Equally useful would be, how do I undo it? Many thanks for whatever anyone can suggest . . . Ted, KN1CBR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
Ted, One other observation, it would appear that you are missing the BAND0 signal at the KPA500. Make sure the ACC connector on the K3 is tight as well as other end at the KPA500 (AUX cable). If you moved things around on the operating desk, it is possible that you incurred some cable damage - you should be able to do a continuity check on the BAND0 signal line in the cable. 73, Don W3FPR On 8/7/2016 5:50 PM, Dauer, Edward wrote: I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That is also exactly what I expected. But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
Success!! Mark, WB9CIF, and Hank, K7HP, both suggested a combination of things including resetting the F/W files, swapping cables around to bypass the KAT, unplugging and reseating all of the aux plugs . . . Hard to say what the winner was, but after doing all the cable things and then reloading the F/W in both the K3 and KPA500, it all works! Now back to the day’s principal objective – getting the K3 on 30 meters. I have no idea why just adding one band to the band map caused those mysterious faults. And, to quote Mark Musick commenting on his once resetting his aux cables, “I don’t know why that solved the problem . . . “ But then, understanding how sacred rituals effect happy outcomes has defied greater minds than mine. Last point, which I have said before and will say again: This reflector is an outstanding community of first-class ops. Many thanks to all who helped me this time. Ted, KN1CBR Edward A. Dauer, LL.B. M.P.H. Dean Emeritus and Professor Emeritus of Law University of Denver On 8/7/16, 4:52 PM, "Mark E. Musick"wrote: My K3S and KPA500 track correctly on 30 meters. If I select 30 meters from the KPA500 front panel both go to 30 meters. When I select 30 meters on the K3S the KPA500 goes to 30. I routinely use the KPA500 to run 200 Watts on 30. This was also true for the K3 I had before the K3S. Check your cables again connecting the K3 aux port to the KPA500. Remove them and reset them and see if that changes anything. I had a similar issue and that solved the problem. I don't know why that solved the problem, but the issue has not reoccurred. Also, after you added 30 to the band map, did you turn the K3 off then back on as suggested in the manual when making changes in the menu? Mark Musick, WB9CIF -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Cliff Frescura Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 10:20 PM To: 'Dauer, Edward' ; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking "But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly." ...it's by design. In the US the maximum power on 30m is 200W PEP. http://www.arrl.org/frequency-allocations 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dauer, Edward Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 2:50 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That is also exactly what I expected. But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. The frequency sampling, however, works perfectly. A single dit on any band switches the KPA500 to the correct band, as defined by the K3. The cables are all Elecraft issue. They are all connected correctly – witness that everything worked perfectly, on every band, until I added 30M into the K3’s band map. Because both the K3 auto tracking feature and the Band buttons on the KPA500 yield the same errors, I think I must have messed up something in the amp. I have, by the way, already RdTFM. Any ideas about what I might have done? Equally useful would be, how do I undo it? Many thanks for whatever anyone can suggest . . . Ted, KN1CBR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list:
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
Seems like an issue with the "BCD" data from the K3 to the KPA500, but the symptoms don't seem to point to a single broken wire. It may be an obscure firmware bug. What happens if you take 30m back out of the band-map? Is the K3 firmware up-to-date? 73, ~iain / N6ML On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Dauer, Edwardwrote: > Thanks, Cliff. I am aware of the 30M 200W power limitation, but I don’t see > why adding 30M to the K3’s Band Map would cause 40 meters and 10 meters to be > in error. When the K3 is at 7.0 MHz the KPA500 switches to 3.5. When the K3 > is at 28.0 MHz the KPA500 switches to 24.9. That never happened before > today. Moreover the amp correctly senses 30M on the first dit and switches > correctly, and seems very happy producing 200W or more on 30M. > > Brian, K3KO, suggested disconnecting the cable from the amp to see what the > band buttons on the amp do. They work correctly with the cable disconnected, > and they work correctly with the cable connected and the K3’s power off. 7.0 > switches to 7.0, 28 switches to 28, and so forth. So what does that mean – > that the fault lies in the K3? But before adding 30M to the Band map in the > K3 changing bands worked for all of 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 – that is, > changing the K3 band changed the KPA500 band correctly. Now it doesn’t work > for 40 and 10, and 30; but it does for 80, 20 and 15. Since the only change > that occurred was adding 30M to the band map, does that mean something is > fouled up in the configuration? I did recycle the power to both the K3 and > the KPA500 after making the configuration change. > > One other fact – pressing the 10MHz band button on the KPA500 correctly > switches the K3 to 10MHz – but places the amp on 5.3 MHz. The amp then > switches to 10 MHz with the first transmitted dit. But pressing the 10MHz > band button on the amp when the K3 power is off changes the amp to 10 MHz. > > Appreciative and still perplexed, Ted, KN1CBR > > > Edward A. Dauer, LL.B. M.P.H. > Dean Emeritus and Professor Emeritus of Law > University of Denver > > > On 8/7/16, 4:19 PM, "Cliff Frescura" wrote: > > "But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly." > > ...it's by design. > > In the US the maximum power on 30m is 200W PEP. > > http://www.arrl.org/frequency-allocations > > 73, > > Cliff K3LL/6 > > -Original Message- > From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of > Dauer, Edward > Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 2:50 PM > To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking > > I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. > > Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had > the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it > automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and > set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in > MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That > is also exactly what I expected. > > But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get > 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz > on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I > get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. > > Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In > MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and > 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. > > The frequency sampling, however, works perfectly. A single dit on any > band switches the KPA500 to the correct band, as defined by the K3. > > The cables are all Elecraft issue. They are all connected correctly – > witness that everything worked perfectly, on every band, until I added 30M > into the K3’s band map. Because both the K3 auto tracking feature and the > Band buttons on the KPA500 yield the same errors, I think I must have messed > up something in the amp. > > I have, by the way, already RdTFM. > > Any ideas about what I might have done? Equally useful would be, how do > I undo it? > > Many thanks for whatever anyone can suggest . . . > > Ted, KN1CBR > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com > > > > > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
5.3mhz is the indication at 60m has been selected. Usually means something is wrong other than the cable since all lines must be high or low. I forget which. Jim ab3cv On Aug 7, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Mark E. Musickwrote: My K3S and KPA500 track correctly on 30 meters. If I select 30 meters from the KPA500 front panel both go to 30 meters. When I select 30 meters on the K3S the KPA500 goes to 30. I routinely use the KPA500 to run 200 Watts on 30. This was also true for the K3 I had before the K3S. Check your cables again connecting the K3 aux port to the KPA500. Remove them and reset them and see if that changes anything. I had a similar issue and that solved the problem. I don't know why that solved the problem, but the issue has not reoccurred. Also, after you added 30 to the band map, did you turn the K3 off then back on as suggested in the manual when making changes in the menu? Mark Musick, WB9CIF -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Cliff Frescura Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 10:20 PM To: 'Dauer, Edward' ; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking "But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly." ...it's by design. In the US the maximum power on 30m is 200W PEP. http://www.arrl.org/frequency-allocations 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dauer, Edward Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 2:50 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That is also exactly what I expected. But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. The frequency sampling, however, works perfectly. A single dit on any band switches the KPA500 to the correct band, as defined by the K3. The cables are all Elecraft issue. They are all connected correctly – witness that everything worked perfectly, on every band, until I added 30M into the K3’s band map. Because both the K3 auto tracking feature and the Band buttons on the KPA500 yield the same errors, I think I must have messed up something in the amp. I have, by the way, already RdTFM. Any ideas about what I might have done? Equally useful would be, how do I undo it? Many thanks for whatever anyone can suggest . . . Ted, KN1CBR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to markmus...@sbcglobal.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to j...@jtmiller.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
Ted, Do you have any other device (non-Elecraft) set up to read the K3 Band Data lines? If so, that may be part of the problem - you may have to add diodes to the band data lines on that device. There is another subtle point about when the KPA500 changes bands. Even though it monitors the band data lines, it does not act on them immediately, it waits for a transmission before changing bands. The details are a bit fuzzy to me right now, but Jack Brindle explained it several years ago and it make sense. 73, Don w3FPR On 8/7/2016 5:50 PM, Dauer, Edward wrote: I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That is also exactly what I expected. But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. The frequency sampling, however, works perfectly. A single dit on any band switches the KPA500 to the correct band, as defined by the K3. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
Ted, Our e-mails crossed. You've cycled both units. I would still try disconnecting the aux cable and resetting it at both ends. Mark, WB9CIF -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dauer, Edward Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 10:42 PM To: Cliff Frescura; elecraft@mailman.qth.net; brian Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking Thanks, Cliff. I am aware of the 30M 200W power limitation, but I don’t see why adding 30M to the K3’s Band Map would cause 40 meters and 10 meters to be in error. When the K3 is at 7.0 MHz the KPA500 switches to 3.5. When the K3 is at 28.0 MHz the KPA500 switches to 24.9. That never happened before today. Moreover the amp correctly senses 30M on the first dit and switches correctly, and seems very happy producing 200W or more on 30M. Brian, K3KO, suggested disconnecting the cable from the amp to see what the band buttons on the amp do. They work correctly with the cable disconnected, and they work correctly with the cable connected and the K3’s power off. 7.0 switches to 7.0, 28 switches to 28, and so forth. So what does that mean – that the fault lies in the K3? But before adding 30M to the Band map in the K3 changing bands worked for all of 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 – that is, changing the K3 band changed the KPA500 band correctly. Now it doesn’t work for 40 and 10, and 30; but it does for 80, 20 and 15. Since the only change that occurred was adding 30M to the band map, does that mean something is fouled up in the configuration? I did recycle the power to both the K3 and the KPA500 after making the configuration change. One other fact – pressing the 10MHz band button on the KPA500 correctly switches the K3 to 10MHz – but places the amp on 5.3 MHz. The amp then switches to 10 MHz with the first transmitted dit. But pressing the 10MHz band button on the amp when the K3 power is off changes the amp to 10 MHz. Appreciative and still perplexed, Ted, KN1CBR Edward A. Dauer, LL.B. M.P.H. Dean Emeritus and Professor Emeritus of Law University of Denver On 8/7/16, 4:19 PM, "Cliff Frescura" wrote: "But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly." ...it's by design. In the US the maximum power on 30m is 200W PEP. http://www.arrl.org/frequency-allocations 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dauer, Edward Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 2:50 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That is also exactly what I expected. But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. The frequency sampling, however, works perfectly. A single dit on any band switches the KPA500 to the correct band, as defined by the K3. The cables are all Elecraft issue. They are all connected correctly – witness that everything worked perfectly, on every band, until I added 30M into the K3’s band map. Because both the K3 auto tracking feature and the Band buttons on the KPA500 yield the same errors, I think I must have messed up something in the amp. I have, by the way, already RdTFM. Any ideas about what I might have done? Equally useful would be, how do I undo it? Many thanks for whatever anyone can suggest . . . Ted, KN1CBR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
My K3S and KPA500 track correctly on 30 meters. If I select 30 meters from the KPA500 front panel both go to 30 meters. When I select 30 meters on the K3S the KPA500 goes to 30. I routinely use the KPA500 to run 200 Watts on 30. This was also true for the K3 I had before the K3S. Check your cables again connecting the K3 aux port to the KPA500. Remove them and reset them and see if that changes anything. I had a similar issue and that solved the problem. I don't know why that solved the problem, but the issue has not reoccurred. Also, after you added 30 to the band map, did you turn the K3 off then back on as suggested in the manual when making changes in the menu? Mark Musick, WB9CIF -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Cliff Frescura Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 10:20 PM To: 'Dauer, Edward'; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking "But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly." ...it's by design. In the US the maximum power on 30m is 200W PEP. http://www.arrl.org/frequency-allocations 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dauer, Edward Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 2:50 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That is also exactly what I expected. But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. The frequency sampling, however, works perfectly. A single dit on any band switches the KPA500 to the correct band, as defined by the K3. The cables are all Elecraft issue. They are all connected correctly – witness that everything worked perfectly, on every band, until I added 30M into the K3’s band map. Because both the K3 auto tracking feature and the Band buttons on the KPA500 yield the same errors, I think I must have messed up something in the amp. I have, by the way, already RdTFM. Any ideas about what I might have done? Equally useful would be, how do I undo it? Many thanks for whatever anyone can suggest . . . Ted, KN1CBR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to markmus...@sbcglobal.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
Thanks, Cliff. I am aware of the 30M 200W power limitation, but I don’t see why adding 30M to the K3’s Band Map would cause 40 meters and 10 meters to be in error. When the K3 is at 7.0 MHz the KPA500 switches to 3.5. When the K3 is at 28.0 MHz the KPA500 switches to 24.9. That never happened before today. Moreover the amp correctly senses 30M on the first dit and switches correctly, and seems very happy producing 200W or more on 30M. Brian, K3KO, suggested disconnecting the cable from the amp to see what the band buttons on the amp do. They work correctly with the cable disconnected, and they work correctly with the cable connected and the K3’s power off. 7.0 switches to 7.0, 28 switches to 28, and so forth. So what does that mean – that the fault lies in the K3? But before adding 30M to the Band map in the K3 changing bands worked for all of 80, 40, 20, 15, and 10 – that is, changing the K3 band changed the KPA500 band correctly. Now it doesn’t work for 40 and 10, and 30; but it does for 80, 20 and 15. Since the only change that occurred was adding 30M to the band map, does that mean something is fouled up in the configuration? I did recycle the power to both the K3 and the KPA500 after making the configuration change. One other fact – pressing the 10MHz band button on the KPA500 correctly switches the K3 to 10MHz – but places the amp on 5.3 MHz. The amp then switches to 10 MHz with the first transmitted dit. But pressing the 10MHz band button on the amp when the K3 power is off changes the amp to 10 MHz. Appreciative and still perplexed, Ted, KN1CBR Edward A. Dauer, LL.B. M.P.H. Dean Emeritus and Professor Emeritus of Law University of Denver On 8/7/16, 4:19 PM, "Cliff Frescura"wrote: "But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly." ...it's by design. In the US the maximum power on 30m is 200W PEP. http://www.arrl.org/frequency-allocations 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dauer, Edward Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 2:50 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That is also exactly what I expected. But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. The frequency sampling, however, works perfectly. A single dit on any band switches the KPA500 to the correct band, as defined by the K3. The cables are all Elecraft issue. They are all connected correctly – witness that everything worked perfectly, on every band, until I added 30M into the K3’s band map. Because both the K3 auto tracking feature and the Band buttons on the KPA500 yield the same errors, I think I must have messed up something in the amp. I have, by the way, already RdTFM. Any ideas about what I might have done? Equally useful would be, how do I undo it? Many thanks for whatever anyone can suggest . . . Ted, KN1CBR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
"But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly." ...it's by design. In the US the maximum power on 30m is 200W PEP. http://www.arrl.org/frequency-allocations 73, Cliff K3LL/6 -Original Message- From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Dauer, Edward Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2016 2:50 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That is also exactly what I expected. But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. The frequency sampling, however, works perfectly. A single dit on any band switches the KPA500 to the correct band, as defined by the K3. The cables are all Elecraft issue. They are all connected correctly – witness that everything worked perfectly, on every band, until I added 30M into the K3’s band map. Because both the K3 auto tracking feature and the Band buttons on the KPA500 yield the same errors, I think I must have messed up something in the amp. I have, by the way, already RdTFM. Any ideas about what I might have done? Equally useful would be, how do I undo it? Many thanks for whatever anyone can suggest . . . Ted, KN1CBR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to c...@cfcorp.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Common mode chokes
Check Jim's tutorial on RFI. You will need some clip on #31 cable ferrites, I think. Mel, K6KBE From: Cortland RichmondTo: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 2:54 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Common mode chokes I had a similar problem in 2005 when noise from a 2kW Honda got into my RV on FD. Lacking any ferrites etc I borrowed a plastic "milk bottle box" and wound about 30 feet of extension cord around it., which worked well as a temporary fix. Cortland ka5s On 8/7/2016 2:21 PM, elecraft-requ...@mailman.qth.net wrote: > I have an inverter generator producing S9 noise on 3.5Mhz, and S7 noise on > 7Mhz. Higher frequencies are clear. > If I were to use a trifilar wound choke on the lead from the generator, what > would be the best mix...43, 77 or? __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to farrerfo...@yahoo.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Common mode chokes
I had a similar problem in 2005 when noise from a 2kW Honda got into my RV on FD. Lacking any ferrites etc I borrowed a plastic "milk bottle box" and wound about 30 feet of extension cord around it., which worked well as a temporary fix. Cortland ka5s On 8/7/2016 2:21 PM, elecraft-requ...@mailman.qth.net wrote: I have an inverter generator producing S9 noise on 3.5Mhz, and S7 noise on 7Mhz. Higher frequencies are clear. If I were to use a trifilar wound choke on the lead from the generator, what would be the best mix...43, 77 or? __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] KPA500 Band Tracking
I must have done something I didn’t mean to do. Just put up a 30 meter antenna today. It works fine. Until today I had the K3 band map set to include only 80-40-20-15-10. The KPA500 tracked it automatically perfectly. I then went into the config menu for band map and set 30 meters to IN. The K3 works perfectly – band switching gives me, in MHz, 3.5 – 7.0 – 10.1 – 14.0 – 21.0 – 28.0 and then cycles back to 3.5 That is also exactly what I expected. But the KPA doesn’t track the K3’s band choice correctly. For 80 I get 80. For 40 on the K3 I get 80 on the KPA500. For 30 on the K3 I get 5.3MHz on the KPA500. For 20 I get 20. For 15 I get 15. And for 10 on the K3 I get 24.9 MHz on the KPA500. Interestingly, the “Band” buttons on the KPA500 have the same errors. In MHz, pressing 1.8 yields 5.3. 3.5 is OK. Pressing 7.0 produces 3.5. 14 and 21 are OK. And pressing 28 produces 24.9. The frequency sampling, however, works perfectly. A single dit on any band switches the KPA500 to the correct band, as defined by the K3. The cables are all Elecraft issue. They are all connected correctly – witness that everything worked perfectly, on every band, until I added 30M into the K3’s band map. Because both the K3 auto tracking feature and the Band buttons on the KPA500 yield the same errors, I think I must have messed up something in the amp. I have, by the way, already RdTFM. Any ideas about what I might have done? Equally useful would be, how do I undo it? Many thanks for whatever anyone can suggest . . . Ted, KN1CBR __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] PX3 Macro and Text Message Utility
PX3 Owners, I'm looking for beta testers to test a new (free) PC-based utility to manage PX3 macros and text messages. First and foremost, I'm looking to test the concept. Of course, I'm also looking to flesh out bugs. A zip file containing the utility, release notes and help file can be found here, http://wickedstone.com/KF5WBO/PX3/PX3_software.htm Simply download and unzip the file to the desired directory. Refer to Help. The Utility works with PX3 firmware 1.45 or later. Please E-mail me privately if you're interested. 73's Joe Stone KF5WBO -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/PX3-Macro-and-Text-Message-Utility-tp7621331.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] KX3/iPad mini and PSK31
Hey All, First Post Ever, but Been running the KX3/PX3 and iPad for Some time. I have the Piglet and do use it from time to time also. The KX3 and iPad will do fine just the 2 of them together. I have found to Turn MIC BUTTON off, and MIC BIAS off. This works. Still need to tweak my VOX levels. Also Run iPad WSPR the Same way. Jeff-N8NOE __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
HTTP is back up, but FTP is dead... no DNS or direct to IP address. __ Clay Autery, KY5G MONTAC Enterprises (318) 518-1389 On 8/7/2016 1:59 PM, Gary Smith wrote: > FWIW, the site is fine in Connecticut. > > 73, > > Gary > KA1J > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to caut...@montac.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
FWIW, the site is fine in Connecticut. 73, Gary KA1J __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
Hi, Exactly the same here in CNY, HTTP server is back after a brief outage, FTP is not. This is the exact opposite of what happened when we had the long, Verizon FIOS only, outage a while ago. Hopefully these findings will help somebody diagnosing the problem. AB2TC - Knut Dick Grolleman wrote > Hi All, > > The website is working again, but the FTP server is not. I wanted to > upgrade > to the newest firmware for my K3, but I can not get the newest version. > > 73 de Dick PA3FQA > -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/web-site-down-tp7621312p7621327.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
It's now up and running here in Watsonville If you are still having issues after Monday 8 AM PDT please send a note to k3sup...@elecraft.com and we'll get our IT team to looking into the issue. 73, Howard Stephenson K6IA __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
Hi All, The website is working again, but the FTP server is not. I wanted to upgrade to the newest firmware for my K3, but I can not get the newest version. 73 de Dick PA3FQA -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Mark Lunday Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 8:13 PM To: 'Clay Autery' ; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] web site down? Working here. I am using Norton for my DNS, and it shows an IP address of 50.31.74.52 If you can't get to http://www.elecraft.com, try http://50.31.74.52 Mark Lunday, WD4ELG Greensboro, NC FM06be wd4...@arrl.net http://wd4elg.blogspot.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to groll...@planet.nl __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
While it was out earlier, I find it to be back up now (18:20 Z) --Dave, W5SV On 8/7/2016 18:13, Mark Lunday wrote: Working here. I am using Norton for my DNS, and it shows an IP address of 50.31.74.52 If you can't get to http://www.elecraft.com, try http://50.31.74.52 Mark Lunday, WD4ELG Greensboro, NC FM06be wd4...@arrl.net http://wd4elg.blogspot.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to w5sv.d...@gmail.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
Working here. I am using Norton for my DNS, and it shows an IP address of 50.31.74.52 If you can't get to http://www.elecraft.com, try http://50.31.74.52 Mark Lunday, WD4ELG Greensboro, NC FM06be wd4...@arrl.net http://wd4elg.blogspot.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Announcement
Propagation has improved slightly over the week. The sun has been sending us plenty of ions without a lot of sunspots. The SFU has risen to 83. Hopefully this will be enough to wake up 20 meters again for the first net. 40 meters has been OK but more local than normal. Maybe that will change too. The elk are doing well; I have been creating bedding spots for them over the last few years which they enjoy. There's nothing like walking through the woods and having four or five elk just appear around to you. They make much less noise than do deer which is odd because they are much bigger. Good thing they don't mind my presence because those large antlers are intimidating. Please join us on: 14050 kHz at 2200z Sunday (3 PM PDT Sunday) 7045 kHz at 0100z Monday (6 PM PDT Sunday) 73, Kevin. KD5ONS __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
Back up in Missouri. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
Not working in Europe. 73 de Dick PA3FQA -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Rose Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 6:43 PM To: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] web site down? Working OK in SW Montana at 10:45 AM __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to groll...@planet.nl __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
Working OK in SW Montana at 10:45 AM __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
It must be a regional issue again with Verizon (has happened before). Working fine here with AT U-Verse in Dallas. 73, Bill-AK5X > On Aug 7, 2016, at 7:50 AM, David F. Reedwrote: > > I went this morning to try to see if there were any microcode updates, and at > first, I could only get the front page, so I thought I'd try later... when I > did, not even that would come up. > > Is anyone else having the same problem? Know what's going on? > > Thanks & 73 de W5SV - Dave > > __ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to wham...@aol.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
Down here too as of 1600 Z. __ Clay Autery, KY5G MONTAC Enterprises (318) 518-1389 On 8/7/2016 7:57 AM, Roy Koeppe wrote: > Yas, > Down here too. > > 73, Roy K6XK > > __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] [OT] Antenna Question
Clipping a 17 foot wire to the top may be easier than adding an inductor. Add at least one 33 foot counterpoise wire - or extend one of the 20 meter counterpoise wires with another clip-on 17 foot wire. 73, Don W3FPR On 8/7/2016 11:32 AM, j...@kk9a.com wrote: That is a huge mismatch. Assuming that the portable 20m vertical is easily assessable I would just clip on an inductor at the base to make it resonant on 40m. If you have elevated radials you would have to put one there also or just lay the radials on the ground. John KK9A [Elecraft] [OT] Antenna Question rick jones n3ikq Sat Aug 6 22:58:39 EDT 2016 Ok sorry for not providing enough info! Consider this scenario: I have a portable vertical with 4 counterpoise wires that is resonant on 20. Lets say I want to tune the antenna up on 40. I can have a tuner right at the base of the antenna OR I can just use a balun at the base of the antenna and use the built in ATU in the K3. Is there a difference in how much power is getting to the antenna? I assume the tuner at the base is the best option which always makes me doubt the usefulness of having an ATU built in to a rig in terms of getting the most power to the antenna. Am I on the right track? Thanks! Rick __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] OT: Annecke ATU wanted
Ah, but how many carry the charger while hiking, David? ;-) Phil W7OX On 8/7/16 12:05 AM, David Andrews wrote: I'm looking for an Annecke balanced (symmetrical) ATU as much for its beauty as its functionality! I know they're rare but does anyone know of one that might be for sale? And, are we really making progress? The charger for the KX2 battery is almost as big as the KX2 itself. 73 David G4CWB __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] [OT] Antenna Question
That is a huge mismatch. Assuming that the portable 20m vertical is easily assessable I would just clip on an inductor at the base to make it resonant on 40m. If you have elevated radials you would have to put one there also or just lay the radials on the ground. John KK9A [Elecraft] [OT] Antenna Question rick jones n3ikq Sat Aug 6 22:58:39 EDT 2016 Ok sorry for not providing enough info! Consider this scenario: I have a portable vertical with 4 counterpoise wires that is resonant on 20. Lets say I want to tune the antenna up on 40. I can have a tuner right at the base of the antenna OR I can just use a balun at the base of the antenna and use the built in ATU in the K3. Is there a difference in how much power is getting to the antenna? I assume the tuner at the base is the best option which always makes me doubt the usefulness of having an ATU built in to a rig in terms of getting the most power to the antenna. Am I on the right track? Thanks! Rick __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] web site down?
Yas, Down here too. 73, Roy K6XK __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] web site down?
I went this morning to try to see if there were any microcode updates, and at first, I could only get the front page, so I thought I'd try later... when I did, not even that would come up. Is anyone else having the same problem? Know what's going on? Thanks & 73 de W5SV - Dave __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] [OT] Antenna Question
Rick, You have been getting very good answers. You are right, the internal ATU helps match the rig to the antenna and/or loss is negligible when you feed the antenna directly or with low loss line (open wire). However, I have operated with bad setups and still made contacts. I actually used a low 80m inverted vee (20' at center, 6' at the ends) on 160 and made a few digital contacts. I figure that antenna was 1% efficient and 99% loss! And I used a similar 40m inverted vee on 30m and managed to work a VK station via JT-65. IDK maybe that setup was 25% efficient. A modern rig with an ATU makes the rig more like the boatanchors of the past that were more flexible in what they load. My old Viking II will load just about anything and I tried some pretty terrible pieces of wire for antennas. The only thing it ever failed to load was a 3 ft metal fishing poleon 160m! 73, Ken WA8JXM On 8/6/16 11:57 PM, rick jones via Elecraft wrote: OK a very good reality check when you look at the numbers! So I'm still trying to figure out the usefulness of a built in tuner. Two situations come to mind: You have no feedline and are driving a wire right out of your rig with a counterpoise (KX3 portable operations) OR you are using it to just "touch up" the load on the PA from an antenna that is close to resonance. I would hope that a good Elmer would point out that a built in ATU does nothing more then keep your PA happy but does nothing toward getting out a good signal AND that if a tuner is necessary, a remote one is a better choice. Thanks for your patience everyone while I get these concepts "right". Other forums would not have been as accommodating. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Common mode chokes
On Sun, 2016-08-07 at 15:50 +1000, Gary wrote: > Hi, > I have an inverter generator producing S9 noise on 3.5Mhz, and S7 > noise on 7Mhz. Higher frequencies are clear. > If I were to use a trifilar wound choke on the lead from the > generator, what would be the best mix...43, 77 or? > I can source ferrite cores here in VK, whether I can obtain what I > will need is unknown but likely. Failing that, Mouser? > I spent a lot of time searching the web but unsure still. > If the learned group could help out with advice it will be greatly > appreciated. > Hello Gary, I have had good luck using mix31 material in the FT-240-31 configuration. See: http://www.fair-rite.com/design-tools/materials/ For an explanation of what each mix does, also see: http://audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf and: http://audiosystemsgroup.com/SAC0305Ferrites.pdf and: http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/chokes/ for more information. -- 73's, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) For software/hardware reviews see: http://www.nk7z.net __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] [OT] Antenna Question
On Sat,8/6/2016 7:58 PM, rick jones via Elecraft wrote: Ok sorry for not providing enough info! Consider this scenario: I have a portable vertical with 4 counterpoise wires that is resonant on 20. Lets say I want to tune the antenna up on 40. Rick, You're asking the wrong questions. The best solution to your problem involves changing the antenna! When you want to operate on 40 (or 30), improvise a mechanical solution to make the antenna longer. Study the ARRL Antenna Book and the ARRL Handbook so that you better understand how antennas work. Another fundamental principle -- the smaller the coax, the greater the loss. The SHORTER the coax, the less the loss. RG58 is BAD, because it's small. RG8X is better, because it's bigger. RG8 is even better, because it's even bigger. And, as Wayne has observed, we don't need "built" or "purchased" antennas for portable/backpacking use. Throw a wire into a tree, or support it vertically, connect it to the center conductor of the coax connector at the output of the rig. Try to get it close to a quarter wave, but don't lose sleep if it isn't real close. Connect one or more wires to the chassis of the rig to act as a counterpoise. Don't know what that word means? Look in the ARRL Handbook. Try to make those wires close to a quarter wave. Don't lose sleep if they aren't. Fire up the radio, activate the tuner, make it tune, and call CQ. We don't need no stinkin' coax! The great small club of which I was a member in Chicago hosted a QRP night every year. We set up in a "forest preserve" -- local park -- and everyone brought their rig and antennas. I brought a K2, battery, a couple of lengths of #18 wire, and a telescoping fiberglass pole. I taped one wire to the pole, shoved it into space between the parts of a picnic table so that it was somewhere between horizontal and vertical, and connected it to the center of the coax connector on the K2. I connected another length of wire to the chassis, and laid it on some weeds. I fired up on 30M and made a half dozen QSOs, AND broke a pileup from a station in the Caribbean. 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
[Elecraft] OT: Annecke ATU wanted
I'm looking for an Annecke balanced (symmetrical) ATU as much for its beauty as its functionality! I know they're rare but does anyone know of one that might be for sale? And, are we really making progress? The charger for the KX2 battery is almost as big as the KX2 itself. 73 David G4CWB __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] [OT] Antenna Question
A lot depends on the band. For example, your 20m vertical would have an SWR of only 8:1 on 17m. Loss with 50' of RG-58 would be about 2 dB. That's not insignificant, but a lot better than not being able to operate on 17m at all. The built-in K3 tuner would have no trouble matching it. I am actually using a 20m dipole on 40. But my feedline is short (34') and it is 600-ohm open wire line. SWR is something like 85:1, and I am living with a loss of about 3 dB because it is a compromise solution that gets me a 7-band antenna in limited space. 73, Vic, 4X6GP Rehovot, Israel Formerly K2VCO http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ On 7 Aug 2016 06:57, rick jones via Elecraft wrote: OK a very good reality check when you look at the numbers! So I'm still trying to figure out the usefulness of a built in tuner. Two situations come to mind: You have no feedline and are driving a wire right out of your rig with a counterpoise (KX3 portable operations) OR you are using it to just "touch up" the load on the PA from an antenna that is close to resonance. I would hope that a good Elmer would point out that a built in ATU does nothing more then keep your PA happy but does nothing toward getting out a good signal AND that if a tuner is necessary, a remote one is a better choice. Thanks for your patience everyone while I get these concepts "right". Other forums would not have been as accommodating. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to k2vco@gmail.com __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
Re: [Elecraft] Common mode chokes
On Sat,8/6/2016 10:50 PM, Gary wrote: I spent a lot of time searching the web but unsure still. k9yc.com/RFI-Ham.pdf See the Choke Cookbook and follow the guidelines for the bands where you have noise, and for coax the size of the power cable. Place the choke as close as possible to the generator. Also study this slide show for a talk I did several years ago about this to our local contest club. http://nccc.cc/pdf/CQP-RFI2013-2.pdf 73, Jim K9YC __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com