RE: [Elecraft] K2/100 current consumption problem - update

2005-03-13 Thread Fraser Robertson
Just a quick note to say thanks to everyone for their help and suggestions.  
I'm affraid I haven't yet got to the bottom of this (excessive current at 
full power on topband on our club's K2).


I could not find anything wrong component/construction wise, but for now I 
have too many other things to do.  For the moment I've turned back the 
internal power control pot.  This means the power display is no longer 
calibrated and the rig gives circa 90W out when set for 110.  This is not a 
big deal in practice and it stops the problem happening.


I suspect, (as G4PIQ suggested) that the power sense circuitry drops off in 
sensitivity on topband.


73 Fraser G4BJM

_
Express yourself with cool new emoticons http://www.msn.co.uk/specials/myemo

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 current consumption problem - update

2005-03-03 Thread Fraser Robertson

So far I haven't found anything wrong as such on #3764:

The LPF components appear fine (value and condition), and check out ok with 
an MFJ analyser for SWR on receive.


T1 and T2 and associated components appear ok.  One thing; C83 is 1000pF, 
not 1200pF as per circuit.  However I tried padding that with a 220pF SM and 
it made no difference.  Looks like 1000pF was supplied with the kit.


I've realigned the BPF on 160/80m, which was pretty much ok anyway.

I've re-adjusted the bias, which was also ok.

I've readjusted the pwr sense pot, again was ok.

With the PA disabled the base K2 draws about 2.5A @ 10W op on all bands.

With the PSU set to exactly 13.8V, and measuring the current (V across 
10x0R1 6W in parallel, in series with V+) I get the following, into a 50R 
load.  Current on the PSU display reads similar.


Set power W Current A 160m Current A 80m
5014   14
6015   15
7016.516.5
8018   18
90 24  19
100   27   20
110   29   21

The actual power out is similar to the set power, to about 10%.So 
topband behaves ok up to about 80W op.  This also happens from a cold start, 
so I don't think it's thermal runaway.


No instabilities are apparent on a scope or spec. an.

Any suggestions appreciated.  Thanks / 73 Fraser G4BJM

_
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 current consumption problem - update

2005-03-03 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy
Fraser,

This is a very very long shot and probably daft! I see that the current
drawn on 160m tracks that drawn on 80m until the RF output passes 80w.going
up.From this I think that it is safe to say that the bad KPA100 is working
as it should to that power output level. Above that it is either starting to
flat-top for X reasons or its standing DC bias is changing perhaps towards
Class A or the driver has run out of steam.

Let me focus on bias change. Is it poissible that 160m RF above a certain
output power level mucks up the PA bias oscillator or that some circuit(s)
in the bias supply resonate at 160m thereby changing the DC bias to the PA.?
There is a lot of PA output RF around, but it might be worthwhile to measure
the DC bias voltage as you run up the PA power.

Capacitor tolerances alone would move such resonances around greatly.

Just a thought.

73,
Geoff.
GM4ESD

- Original Message -
From: Fraser Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 current consumption problem - update


 So far I haven't found anything wrong as such on #3764:

 The LPF components appear fine (value and condition), and check out ok
with
 an MFJ analyser for SWR on receive.

 T1 and T2 and associated components appear ok.  One thing; C83 is 1000pF,
 not 1200pF as per circuit.  However I tried padding that with a 220pF SM
and
 it made no difference.  Looks like 1000pF was supplied with the kit.

 I've realigned the BPF on 160/80m, which was pretty much ok anyway.

 I've re-adjusted the bias, which was also ok.

 I've readjusted the pwr sense pot, again was ok.

 With the PA disabled the base K2 draws about 2.5A @ 10W op on all bands.

 With the PSU set to exactly 13.8V, and measuring the current (V across
 10x0R1 6W in parallel, in series with V+) I get the following, into a 50R
 load.  Current on the PSU display reads similar.

 Set power W Current A 160m Current A 80m
 5014   14
 6015   15
 7016.516.5
 8018   18
 90 24  19
 100   27   20
 110   29   21

 The actual power out is similar to the set power, to about 10%.So
 topband behaves ok up to about 80W op.  This also happens from a cold
start,
 so I don't think it's thermal runaway.

 No instabilities are apparent on a scope or spec. an.

 Any suggestions appreciated.  Thanks / 73 Fraser G4BJM


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 current consumption problem - update

2005-03-03 Thread Vic Rosenthal

Fraser Robertson wrote:

 One thing; C83 is 
1000pF, not 1200pF as per circuit.  However I tried padding that with a 
220pF SM and it made no difference.  Looks like 1000pF was supplied with 
the kit.


Hi Fraser,

The change from 1200 to 1000 was made after the field test.  It improves 
efficiency on 10 meters.  It shouldn't have any effect on 160.  1000 is correct.


I admit to being mystified by your problem!

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 current consumption problem - update

2005-03-03 Thread Fraser Robertson
Thanks Geoff, the TR bias HV is 139V on RX.  On TX at 70W out it's about 
118V on 160m and 80m.  With power flat out it's 113V on 80m and 109V on 
160m.  So I think that's ok.


The voltage on U7B pin 5 and 6 is identical on 160m and 80m at full power at 
675mV, so I think the PA bias current is behaving.


G3VTT suggested the transformers, but they have the correct number of turns, 
including the po/swr sensor T4.


Thanks / 73 Fraser G4BJM






From: Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Fraser Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Elecraft Discussion List elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 current consumption problem - update
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:26:48 -

Fraser,

This is a very very long shot and probably daft! I see that the current
drawn on 160m tracks that drawn on 80m until the RF output passes 80w.going
up.From this I think that it is safe to say that the bad KPA100 is 
working
as it should to that power output level. Above that it is either starting 
to

flat-top for X reasons or its standing DC bias is changing perhaps towards
Class A or the driver has run out of steam.

Let me focus on bias change. Is it poissible that 160m RF above a certain
output power level mucks up the PA bias oscillator or that some circuit(s)
in the bias supply resonate at 160m thereby changing the DC bias to the 
PA.?
There is a lot of PA output RF around, but it might be worthwhile to 
measure

the DC bias voltage as you run up the PA power.

Capacitor tolerances alone would move such resonances around greatly.

Just a thought.

73,
Geoff.
GM4ESD

- Original Message -
From: Fraser Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2/100 current consumption problem - update


 So far I haven't found anything wrong as such on #3764:

 The LPF components appear fine (value and condition), and check out ok
with
 an MFJ analyser for SWR on receive.

 T1 and T2 and associated components appear ok.  One thing; C83 is 
1000pF,

 not 1200pF as per circuit.  However I tried padding that with a 220pF SM
and
 it made no difference.  Looks like 1000pF was supplied with the kit.

 I've realigned the BPF on 160/80m, which was pretty much ok anyway.

 I've re-adjusted the bias, which was also ok.

 I've readjusted the pwr sense pot, again was ok.

 With the PA disabled the base K2 draws about 2.5A @ 10W op on all bands.

 With the PSU set to exactly 13.8V, and measuring the current (V across
 10x0R1 6W in parallel, in series with V+) I get the following, into a 
50R

 load.  Current on the PSU display reads similar.

 Set power W Current A 160m Current A 80m
 5014   14
 6015   15
 7016.516.5
 8018   18
 90 24  19
 100   27   20
 110   29   21

 The actual power out is similar to the set power, to about 10%.So
 topband behaves ok up to about 80W op.  This also happens from a cold
start,
 so I don't think it's thermal runaway.

 No instabilities are apparent on a scope or spec. an.

 Any suggestions appreciated.  Thanks / 73 Fraser G4BJM




_
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft


Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] K2/100 current consumption problem - update

2005-03-03 Thread W3FPR - Don Wilhelm
Fraser,

If you have a 'scope handy, try cranking the power up to 100 watts on 160
and 80 and observing the CW envelope - if you see what looks like weak
modulation on the top and bottom of the envelope pattern, you have a low
frequency oscillation.  If you do have that oscillation, the 'cure' has been
discussed on this reflector - on the KPA100, put a 1K resistor across RFC3,
and change R4 from 100k to 39k.

I have worked on KPA100s having this modulation problem, but never related
it to current draw before, but it is worthy of investigation.

73,
Don W3FPR

 -Original Message-

 Thanks Geoff, the TR bias HV is 139V on RX.  On TX at 70W out it's about
 118V on 160m and 80m.  With power flat out it's 113V on 80m and 109V on
 160m.  So I think that's ok.

 The voltage on U7B pin 5 and 6 is identical on 160m and 80m at
 full power at
 675mV, so I think the PA bias current is behaving.

 G3VTT suggested the transformers, but they have the correct
 number of turns,
 including the po/swr sensor T4.

 Thanks / 73 Fraser G4BJM




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com