Re: [O] Bug header argumednt :file does not produce a file or a link to the file
Hello, Charles Millar via Emacs-orgmode writes: > Now a "just curious," comment and question: > > I had a few files that used the ECM source code block, just many more > entries in each. The last time that I evaluated any of them was last > October and it produced the results I expected, i.e. I did not specify > ":results file" > > So, up until October was I just lucky or did something change in Org > that affected the sh language? It changed between Org 9.2 and Org 9.3, for every language. There is an ORG-NEWS entry about it, namely: *** ~:file~ header argument no longer assume "file" ~:results~ Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] Agenda: Display projects and 3 todo subtasks
I ran into another possible solution for the request of seeing the first
X TODO tasks for a project in the Agenda:
Let's say I simply run an org-tags-todo query looking for :project:
The Agenda now shows this:
Project1
Project2
Project3
Another possible solution would be to simply TAB to one of the projects, and
run org-todo-list with the restriction on the current subtree.
I'm trying to find a way to create a function to do this . . . . . . I guess
a macro-like function would work
Thanks,
--Nate
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:59 AM Sacha Chua wrote:
> Hmm, you're right, that project subtask snippet isn't working any more. I
> don't think I can sort that out while I'm away from my computer, so it may
> take me a few weeks until I can poke around. If anyone happens to have a
> better config, please feel free to share!
>
> On Wed., Jul. 31, 2019, 10:37 Nathan Neff, wrote:
>
>> I forgot to mention that I have PROJECT tag as not inheritable:
>> (setq org-tags-exclude-from-inheritance (quote ("PROJECT")))
>>
>> And here's the agenda custom-command addition:
>> ("2" "List projects with tasks" my/org-agenda-projects-and-tasks
>> "+PROJECT"
>> ((org-agenda-max-entries 3))
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 9:32 PM Nathan Neff
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I found this cool snippet at Sacha Chua's website: [1].
>>>
>>> It creates an agenda view with headings marked with tag "project",
>>> and for each of those headings, it displays up to 3 sub headings marked
>>> TODO.
>>>
>>> I like this idea of seeing my projects (plus a few TODO entries under
>>> each project)
>>> in the agenda is a cool idea, so I copy/pasted the snippet at [1].
>>>
>>> I created an example org file:
>>> * Project 1:PROJECT:
>>> ** todo task 1.1
>>> ** todo task 1.2
>>> ** todo task 1.3
>>> ** todo task 1.4
>>> * Project 2:PROJECT:
>>> ** todo task 2.1
>>> ** todo task 2.2
>>> ** todo task 2.3
>>> ** todo task 2.4
>>>
>>> And ran the custom agenda command on only that file.
>>>
>>> The output which is produced lists each project correctly.
>>> However the sub-tasks under each project are the *same 3 subtasks*
>>> from Project 1
>>>
>>> foo:Project 1
>>> foo:todo task 1.1
>>> foo:todo task 1.2
>>> foo:todo task 1.3
>>> foo:Project 2
>>> foo:todo task 1.1
>>> foo:todo task 1.2
>>> foo:todo task 1.3
>>>
>>> The snippet at [1] is a bit more complex than I thought would be
>>> necessary for such
>>> an agenda view. Does someone have any snippets or suggestions for how to
>>> accomplish the idea above? Is there something obvious that I'm missing
>>> about
>>> the setup of my test org file?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --Nate
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://github.com/sachac/.emacs.d/blob/gh-pages/Sacha.org#display-projects-with-associated-subtasks
>>> The associated blog entry is:
>>>
>>> https://sachachua.com/blog/2013/01/emacs-org-display-projects-with-a-few-subtasks-in-the-agenda-view/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: [O] join two or more tables
Uwe Brauer writes: > Hm, thanks but could you post an example (the one I finally used is > based on R and goes as follows There's a whole tutorial on table manipulation on Worg: https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/examples/lob-table-operations.html It's a bit old so some of the functions may be named differently now, but the principles should still apply. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Blofeld: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds
Re: [O] Bug header argumednt :file does not produce a file or a link to the file
On 8/23/19 4:15 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Hello, Charles Millar via Emacs-orgmode writes: #+begin_src sh :file test.rec cat << EOF # -*- mode: rec -*- %rec: somerecord Account: something Amount: 0.00 end of file EOF #+end_src I expect that when I execute the above code block that 1. An external file test.rec is produced with contents # -*- mode: rec -*- %rec: somerecord Account: something Amount: 0.00 end of file and 2. A link to that file is placed below the source code block Instead all I get is a table and no external file is created You probably need to specify that the output is a file, which is not the default for "sh" language. You may want to add ":results file" to the header of the source block. Regards, Thank you, Nicolas. That solved it. Now a "just curious," comment and question: I had a few files that used the ECM source code block, just many more entries in each. The last time that I evaluated any of them was last October and it produced the results I expected, i.e. I did not specify ":results file" So, up until October was I just lucky or did something change in Org that affected the sh language? Regards, Charlie Millar
Re: [O] join two or more tables
> What about: > #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var t1=nut :var t2=nut2 :colnames yes > (append t1 t2) > #+end_src > #+RESULTS: > | type | Fiber | Sugar | Protein | Carb | > |--+---+---+-+--| > | eggplant | 2.5 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 8.6 | > | tomatoe | 0.6 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 3.4 | > | onion| 1.3 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 9.0 | > | egg | 0 | 18.3 |31.9 | 18.3 | > | rice | 0.2 | 0 | 1.5 | 16.0 | > | bread| 0.7 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 16.0 | > | orange | 3.1 | 11.9 | 1.3 | 17.6 | > | banana | 2.1 | 9.9 | 0.9 | 18.5 | > | tofu | 0.7 | 0.5 | 6.6 | 1.4 | > | nut | 2.6 | 1.3 | 4.9 | 7.2 | > | corn | 4.7 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 21.3 | > Of course, this works because both tables have headers, which can be > handled by the ":colnames yes" header-argument. If both are headerless, > "colnames: no" would do the trick. Thanks very much, this was precisely what I was looking for. The R based solution works fine but I prefer one which is based on elisp. Uwe smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[O] join two or more tables
> Hi > > I was googling this a bit, I found more complicated scenarios, but > not how to join one or more tables. > > For example > #+begin_src > > #+tblname: nut > | type | Fiber | Sugar | Protein | Carb | > |--+---+---+-+--| > | eggplant | 2.5 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 8.6 | > | tomatoe | 0.6 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 3.4 | > | onion| 1.3 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 9.0 | > | egg | 0 | 18.3 |31.9 | 18.3 | > > > #+tblname: nut2 > | type | Fiber | Sugar | Protein | Carb | > |--+---+---+-+--| > | rice | 0.2 | 0 | 1.5 | 16.0 | > | bread| 0.7 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 16.0 | > | orange | 3.1 | 11.9 | 1.3 | 17.6 | > | banana | 2.1 | 9.9 | 0.9 | 18.5 | > | tofu | 0.7 | 0.5 | 6.6 | 1.4 | > | nut | 2.6 | 1.3 | 4.9 | 7.2 | > | corn | 4.7 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 21.3 | > #+end_src What about: #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var t1=nut :var t2=nut2 :colnames yes (append t1 t2) #+end_src #+RESULTS: | type | Fiber | Sugar | Protein | Carb | |--+---+---+-+--| | eggplant | 2.5 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 8.6 | | tomatoe | 0.6 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 3.4 | | onion| 1.3 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 9.0 | | egg | 0 | 18.3 |31.9 | 18.3 | | rice | 0.2 | 0 | 1.5 | 16.0 | | bread| 0.7 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 16.0 | | orange | 3.1 | 11.9 | 1.3 | 17.6 | | banana | 2.1 | 9.9 | 0.9 | 18.5 | | tofu | 0.7 | 0.5 | 6.6 | 1.4 | | nut | 2.6 | 1.3 | 4.9 | 7.2 | | corn | 4.7 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 21.3 | Of course, this works because both tables have headers, which can be handled by the ":colnames yes" header-argument. If both are headerless, "colnames: no" would do the trick. Handling the case where one has headers and the other not, or when there are hlines in the table is still a conudrum for me: I haven't (yet) been able to find the documentation on how these things are stored... HTH, -- Emmanuel Charpentier
Re: [O] Org mode pollutes the narrow-map
Hello, Omar Antolín Camarena writes: > Hello everyone, > > Does it seems a little rude that Org mode binds its own narrowing commands in > the global narrow-map? > > You can find this in org.el starting at line 19018: > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > Narrow map > (org-defkey narrow-map "s" #'org-narrow-to-subtree) > (org-defkey narrow-map "b" #'org-narrow-to-block) > (org-defkey narrow-map "e" #'org-narrow-to-element) > #+end_src > > I don't need or really want those commands bound in non-org buffers. > I think it would be better to bind them (to C-x n s, C-x n b and C-x > n e) in org-mode-map. This is the approach taken by AUCTeX, for > example. (To be clear, I mean AUCTeX has some narrowing commands and > it binds them to C-x n e and C-x n g in its own keymaps.) It sounds reasonable. I changed the bindings in master. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
Re: [O] Bug header argumednt :file does not produce a file or a link to the file
Hello, Charles Millar via Emacs-orgmode writes: > #+begin_src sh :file test.rec > cat << EOF > # -*- mode: rec -*- > > %rec: somerecord > > Account: something > Amount: 0.00 > > end of file > EOF > > #+end_src > > I expect that when I execute the above code block that > > 1. An external file test.rec is produced with contents > > # -*- mode: rec -*- > > %rec: somerecord > > Account: something > Amount: 0.00 > > end of file > > and > > 2. A link to that file is placed below the source code block > > Instead all I get is a table and no external file is created You probably need to specify that the output is a file, which is not the default for "sh" language. You may want to add ":results file" to the header of the source block. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
