Re: Feature request: Radio button option for lists of checkboxes
istr an org-choice package that did somthin siilar with entries. On 2/12/20, Bastien wrote: > Hi Matus, > > Matus Goljer writes: > >> Thank you both for following up on this! I'm going to add a note to >> my package that this feature is now built-in and deprecate it. > > You might want to wait a little bit before deprecating your package, > there might be some differences with the built-in implementation that > make your package more useful to some users? > > A link to the built-in implementation is always good, of course. > > Thanks! > > -- > Bastien > > -- The Kafka Pandemic What is misopathy? https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2013/10/why-some-diseases-are-wronged.html
Re: Feature request: Radio button option for lists of checkboxes
Thank you both for following up on this! I'm going to add a note to my package that this feature is now built-in and deprecate it. m. On Wed, 12 Feb 2020, 08:43 Bastien, wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Phil Sainty writes: > > > A nice feature that may be missing from this implementation > > is the ability to mark individual lists as radio-button lists, > > and then have C-c C-c do the right thing contextually. > > Good idea, this is now in. > > > The syntax John and Matúš used was: > > > > #+attr_org: :radio > > I think it should be "#+attr_org: :radio t". > > Try "#+attr_org: :radio t" and let me know if it works for you. > > > If that's practical to add to the new implementation, I would think > > it would provide the best end-user experience for interacting with > > such lists. > > Yes, I find it nice too, thanks again for suggestion this! > > Best, > > -- > Bastien >
Re: Feature request: Radio button option for lists of checkboxes
Hi Matus, Matus Goljer writes: > Thank you both for following up on this! I'm going to add a note to > my package that this feature is now built-in and deprecate it. You might want to wait a little bit before deprecating your package, there might be some differences with the built-in implementation that make your package more useful to some users? A link to the built-in implementation is always good, of course. Thanks! -- Bastien
Re: Feature request: Radio button option for lists of checkboxes
Hi Phil, Phil Sainty writes: > A nice feature that may be missing from this implementation > is the ability to mark individual lists as radio-button lists, > and then have C-c C-c do the right thing contextually. Good idea, this is now in. > The syntax John and Matúš used was: > > #+attr_org: :radio I think it should be "#+attr_org: :radio t". Try "#+attr_org: :radio t" and let me know if it works for you. > If that's practical to add to the new implementation, I would think > it would provide the best end-user experience for interacting with > such lists. Yes, I find it nice too, thanks again for suggestion this! Best, -- Bastien
Re: Feature request: Radio button option for lists of checkboxes
On 12/02/20 12:10 pm, Bastien wrote: > From latest master, please try C-c C-x C-r on a checkbox or turn > on M-x org-list-checkbox-radio-mode RET so that C-c C-c consider > all checkboxes as radio buttons. Brilliant, thanks Bastien! A nice feature that may be missing from this implementation is the ability to mark individual lists as radio-button lists, and then have C-c C-c do the right thing contextually. The syntax John and Matúš used was: #+attr_org: :radio - [ ] localhost - [X] staging - [ ] production Then you can always just use C-c C-c to select a checkbox -- but if the list is intended to be radio buttons then that behaviour gets used automatically. If that's practical to add to the new implementation, I would think it would provide the best end-user experience for interacting with such lists. -Phil p.s. Their code for detecting this was along similar lines: (when (-contains? (org-element-property :attr_org (org-element-property :parent (org-element-context))) ":radio") vs (let ((list (org-radiobutton--get-list-at-point))) (when (-contains? (org-element-property :attr_org list) ":radio")
Re: Feature request: Radio button option for lists of checkboxes
Hi Phil, Phil Sainty writes: > (Where "radio button" means that for a list of checkboxes, only > one may be selected at any given time -- selecting a different > checkbox automatically de-selects the previous one.) >From latest master, please try C-c C-x C-r on a checkbox or turn on M-x org-list-checkbox-radio-mode RET so that C-c C-c consider all checkboxes as radio buttons. Thanks for sharing this idea! Best, -- Bastien
Feature request: Radio button option for lists of checkboxes
(Where "radio button" means that for a list of checkboxes, only one may be selected at any given time -- selecting a different checkbox automatically de-selects the previous one.) Hello org-mode, John Kitchin posted this blog a few years back: http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu/blog/2015/10/05/A-checkbox-list-in-org-mode-with-one-value/ Subsequently Matúš Goljer adapted that code here: https://github.com/Fuco1/org-radiobutton I'm slow in following this up, but I contacted both John and Matúš last year suggesting that this facility would make a nice addition to the core org-mode features. Both of them were happy for me to submit the feature request, and both confirmed that they have signed FSF copyright assignment, and so their code may be safely adapted. I have CC'd them both to this message. Matúš's github project has subsequently merged a branch from one other contributor, so I have pushed a fork which excludes that particular change, as I am not aware of the copyright status for that. This FSF-safe fork is: https://github.com/phil-s/org-radiobutton (n.b. I've assigned FSF copyright for Emacs too, but none of the code on this fork was written by me.) John also independently made some later changes to his original code, and the current version of that can be found here: https://github.com/jkitchin/scimax/blob/740591268a868b4944193e0600bf71b6f2553f2b/scimax-org.el#L1426 Both implementations depend upon the dash library, so I expect the relevant bits of code would need rewriting. I suspect that a standard implementation would be able to approach things a bit differently in any case; but the existing code would surely provide at minimum a valuable reference for a core implementation, and I imagine at least some of the code could be used verbatim. I'm not familiar with org-mode internals, so I've not attempted to provide a patch for this, but I'm hoping there's enough here that someone with existing knowledge could run with it, as it seems like a nice feature to include. -Phil
