That sounds awesome! Tuned in to hear what everyone else thinks!
On Sat, Nov 19, 2022, 3:40 PM Steffen Möller wrote:
>
>
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. November 2022 um 11:58 Uhr
> > Von: "Jérémie Tarot"
> > An: "EMC developers"
> > Betreff: Re: [Emc-developers] 2.9 Release Manager Required.
> >
> > Le mar. 15 nov. 2022 à 01:03, Rod Webster a
> écrit :
> > >
> > > I'll just wait until you guys decide on a way forward and iff the
> offer we
> > > have is required.
> > > Perhaps the Github actions could be extended to build the 2.9 branch?
> >
> > I don't see what would prevent us to build whatever branches we'd want
> to !?
> >
> > > If that were possible, maybe the VM here does the RTAI build?
> >
> > That remains possible with the GitHub actions thanks to the
> > self-hosted runners feature:
> > https://github.com/actions/runner
> > https://docs.github.com/en/actions/hosting-your-own-runners
> > https://github.com/actions/runner/blob/main/docs/start/envlinux.md
> >
> > > I'm not sure git will host the resulting debs
> >
> > Sadly, the GitHub Packages feature only supports programming languages
> > modules packages.
> > This is why I looked for an hosting solution and found PackageCloud.io
> > which does just that.
> >
> > > but it might be worth mentioning the Open build Service I linked to
> earlier can be incorporated
> > > right into sources.list with the appropriate security keys.
> >
> > It is indeed ! Can't believe I didn't remember it and even that it
> > didn't pop up in the many searches I did :/
> > This could actually be the best option to keep all builds (RTAI
> > included), as it looks like OBS supports custom-built containers and
> > VMs, and package hosting all in the same place. It may well be able to
> > build the live ISO too, but I'm still not sure about that...
> > It also supports GitHub integration via webhooks and status reporting,
> > as well as it is Open Source and self-hostable, and even available in
> > Debian... what else ?! :)
> >
> https://openbuildservice.org/help/manuals/obs-user-guide/cha.obs.scm_ci_workflow_integration.html
> >
> > OBS repositories could at least be mirrored/synced to
> > http://linuxcnc.org/dists/ if no more elegant solution is available
> >
> > WDYT ?
> >
> > PS: Brother projects like MesaCT, QtPyVCP, etc. packages could also be
> > built under LinuxCNC umbrella there too
>
> I do not get all the details but I tend to think that an external build
> service would free energy for us to concentrate on LinuxCNC itself, so I am
> very much up for it.
>
> Best,
> Steffen
>
>
>
> ___
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
