Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-19 Thread andrew beck
Here is a quick video of some of the different parts

This one is not using the tailstock

https://youtu.be/_3mKA7dri60?si=vafE_I3i054bXf8E


On Thu, 19 Oct 2023, 20:42 andrew beck,  wrote:

> Hey guys I think I fixed the issue.
>
> The wear remap is perfect.
>
> The issue was I was using classic ladder for toolchanger and then also the
> remap.
>
> And I think they had timing issues.  1 toolchange out of 500 fails.
>
>
> I changed to using the carousel component and remaps
>
> I just added to the wear remap
>
>
> Andy your carousel component is absolutely awesome.
>
> My toolchanges are so fast now.
>
> We have made 800 parts over the last 3 days with about 6 tool changes each
> and perfect operation
>
>
> I'm happy as
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Andrew
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, 09:09 andrew beck,  wrote:
>
>> Yep I'll keep digging and reply back here later
>>
>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, 08:38 andy pugh,  wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 19:19, andrew beck 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > And also the fact that Linux CNC was showing t3 when t3 was the one
>>> loaded.
>>> >
>>> > Even though the code had gone past the t4 command
>>>
>>> If you can find a recipe to recreate the issue then perhaps there is a
>>> way to investigate what's going on.
>>>
>>> --
>>> atp
>>> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
>>> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
>>> lunatics."
>>> — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Emc-users mailing list
>>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>>
>>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-19 Thread andrew beck
Hey guys I think I fixed the issue.

The wear remap is perfect.

The issue was I was using classic ladder for toolchanger and then also the
remap.

And I think they had timing issues.  1 toolchange out of 500 fails.


I changed to using the carousel component and remaps

I just added to the wear remap


Andy your carousel component is absolutely awesome.

My toolchanges are so fast now.

We have made 800 parts over the last 3 days with about 6 tool changes each
and perfect operation


I'm happy as


Regards


Andrew

On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, 09:09 andrew beck,  wrote:

> Yep I'll keep digging and reply back here later
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, 08:38 andy pugh,  wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 19:19, andrew beck 
>> wrote:
>>
>> > And also the fact that Linux CNC was showing t3 when t3 was the one
>> loaded.
>> >
>> > Even though the code had gone past the t4 command
>>
>> If you can find a recipe to recreate the issue then perhaps there is a
>> way to investigate what's going on.
>>
>> --
>> atp
>> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
>> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
>> lunatics."
>> — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Emc-users mailing list
>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-12 Thread andrew beck
Yep I'll keep digging and reply back here later

On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, 08:38 andy pugh,  wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 19:19, andrew beck 
> wrote:
>
> > And also the fact that Linux CNC was showing t3 when t3 was the one
> loaded.
> >
> > Even though the code had gone past the t4 command
>
> If you can find a recipe to recreate the issue then perhaps there is a
> way to investigate what's going on.
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."
> — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-12 Thread andy pugh
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 19:19, andrew beck  wrote:

> And also the fact that Linux CNC was showing t3 when t3 was the one loaded.
>
> Even though the code had gone past the t4 command

If you can find a recipe to recreate the issue then perhaps there is a
way to investigate what's going on.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-12 Thread andrew beck
Hey andy

I just have a pocket sensor home sensor  and classic ladder counter.

Plus carousel clamped and unclamped sensors etc.


But I don't think that was the problem.


If that was the case I would expect the offsets to be incorrect.

Eg t4 would be using t3 offsets and try machine in wrong location


But offsets were correct. Only issue is t3 which tells me toolchanger is
fine.

And also the fact that Linux CNC was showing t3 when t3 was the one loaded.

Even though the code had gone past the t4 command

And when I did a toolchange after crash to t4 it changed the tool (rotated
carousel).

And axis GUI then updated to t4



On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, 03:43 andy pugh,  wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 10:33, andrew beck 
> wrote:
> >
> > No we pushed cycle stop changed a offset by 0.01mm  waited 2 minutes then
> > restarted whole program from beginning.
>
> Could your observations be explained by the toolchanger position not
> being what the system thought it was?
>
> What sort of toolchanger position feedback do you have?
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."
> — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-12 Thread andy pugh
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 10:33, andrew beck  wrote:
>
> No we pushed cycle stop changed a offset by 0.01mm  waited 2 minutes then
> restarted whole program from beginning.

Could your observations be explained by the toolchanger position not
being what the system thought it was?

What sort of toolchanger position feedback do you have?

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-12 Thread andrew beck
No we pushed cycle stop changed a offset by 0.01mm  waited 2 minutes then
restarted whole program from beginning.

On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, 21:59 andy pugh,  wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 02:41, andrew beck 
> wrote:
>
> > We stopped it and then changed a wear offset and it ignored the
> toolchange
> > and tried to machine with t3 instead of changing to t4.
>
> Was this with run-from-line? (You say that you stopped it)
>
> Which line did you run from?
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."
> — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-12 Thread andy pugh
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 02:41, andrew beck  wrote:

> We stopped it and then changed a wear offset and it ignored the toolchange
> and tried to machine with t3 instead of changing to t4.

Was this with run-from-line? (You say that you stopped it)

Which line did you run from?

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] Lathe ignores tool number change using fanucy wear offset patch

2023-10-11 Thread andrew beck
Hey guys. Got a problem with my CNC lathe

It randomally tried to run a program with the wrong tool number.

I'm using the fanucy wear offset patch to get wear offsets as linuxcnc
doesn't offer that yet as stock standard.

This lathe has done about 4000 toolchanges faultlessly.

We stopped it and then changed a wear offset and it ignored the toolchange
and tried to machine with t3 instead of changing to t4.

Then after the crash we typed in t4 again and it rotated to correct pocket.

So problem is not the toolchanger.

I think it might be the remap...


Does anyone have any ideas?

Toolchanger is not the issue that works fine

Linux CNC goes past the gcode file u can see it read t4 but then it ignores
it and just runs t3 still and you can see in axis that t3 is loaded.  And
it uses t3 offsets so it's trying to go to the right place just using the
wrong tool.

In this case a od turning tool instead of a drill bit lol.

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe wear offsets remap help

2023-02-11 Thread andrew beck
Sweet well that works great for now



On Sun, 12 Feb 2023, 04:56 Andy Pugh,  wrote:

>
>
> > On 11 Feb 2023, at 00:28, andrew beck  wrote:
> >
> >  it looks like the wear offset is not
> > separated and i don't know to change x and not z
>
> Oh, yes. Thinking about it, it will.
> You might have to actually store half the value in the tool table.
> There is probably a way to pick out the individual offsets and add them
> together, but I am away from my LinuxCNC machines this week.
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe wear offsets remap help

2023-02-11 Thread Andy Pugh



> On 11 Feb 2023, at 00:28, andrew beck  wrote:
> 
>  it looks like the wear offset is not
> separated and i don't know to change x and not z

Oh, yes. Thinking about it, it will. 
You might have to actually store half the value in the tool table. 
There is probably a way to pick out the individual offsets and add them 
together, but I am away from my LinuxCNC machines this week. 

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe wear offsets remap help

2023-02-10 Thread andrew beck
awesome

i went and had a look and my brain hurts


this is the code in the toolchange sub remap

what would i need to change?  it looks like the wear offset is not
separated and i don't know to change x and not z


if you can show me i will make a big post in the linuxcnc forum all about
setting up wear offsets so that next time someone can search for that

regards

Andrew
===
O sub
(debug, Tool requested = #)
# = [1 + FIX[ #  / 100]]
# = [# MOD 100]
M6 T#
G43 H#
O100 IF [# GT 1]
G43.2 H#
O100 ENDIF
# = #
(debug, tool = # wear = #)
O endsub [0]
===
regards

Andrew


On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 10:06 AM Andy Pugh  wrote:

>
>
> > On 10 Feb 2023, at 21:44, andrew beck  wrote:
> >
> > And I trying to change the toolchange.ngc file?
>
> Yes, that’s where the offset is applied.
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe wear offsets remap help

2023-02-10 Thread Andy Pugh


> On 10 Feb 2023, at 21:44, andrew beck  wrote:
> 
> And I trying to change the toolchange.ngc file?

Yes, that’s where the offset is applied. 

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe wear offsets remap help

2023-02-10 Thread andrew beck
Haha might have known you wrote it Andy

I'll go get the script now to have a look at it

And I trying to change the toolchange.ngc file?

Or the python stuff?

One thing I need to do is make sure I half the X axis wear offset and don't
change the z axis wear offset



On Sat, 11 Feb 2023, 02:27 Andy Pugh,  wrote:

>
>
> > On 10 Feb 2023, at 06:42, andrew beck  wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know who wrote the fanucy style wear offset remap?
>
> I did it.
> Note that I have never used a Fanuc machine.
> >
> > It would be good to change it to be in dia eg divide the wear
>
> This should be a simple change in the remap NGC file.
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe wear offsets remap help

2023-02-10 Thread Andy Pugh



> On 10 Feb 2023, at 06:42, andrew beck  wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know who wrote the fanucy style wear offset remap?

I did it. 
Note that I have never used a Fanuc machine. 
> 
> It would be good to change it to be in dia eg divide the wear

This should be a simple change in the remap NGC file. 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] Lathe wear offsets remap help

2023-02-09 Thread andrew beck
Hey guys

Does anyone know who wrote the fanucy style wear offset remap?

I put it on my lathe and it is great.

Not perfect but much better than stock standard tool offsets.

There are two things I would like to change.

First the wear offset is in radius.

It would be good to change it to be in dia eg divide the wear offset in
tooltable by 2 in the remap?

And the second one is a bit harder.

Because m6 is remapped when I use the run from line function all the
toolchanges in the program get queued up and happen even if I run from line
at the very end of the program.

I think this one might just be something I have to live with.  But it's
worth asking the question.

Regards

Andrew

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-29 Thread Chris Albertson
This is a common augment, that the NTC does not have time to cool in 15
seconds.   But I also ask if the filter caps have time to discharge through
the bleeder resisters in 15 seconds?

If designed correctly the two time constants would be about the same.
 Maybe about 120 or 180 seconds for both.

Also, you can design a linear supply with a CRC filter where the "R" limits
inrush,   It is not impossible you just have to work it out.  In the old
days when they only had vacuum tube rectifier there was no option, they had
to use CRC filters with the first C limited to about 50 uF so as to protect
the tube from inrush.   This approach still works





On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 1:35 PM John Dammeyer 
wrote:

> I looked at using the NTC resistors to limit inrush.  I have some but
> never used them for this.  The issue is simple as they are meant for
> systems that have high inrush and are then powered continuously for a long
> period of time.   (Like an old style Tube based TV or Radio).
>
> That may also well be true of CNC systems too but all too often I've also
> had to switch off the power and switch it on again.  For example, does the
> ESTOP remove the AC input to the high voltage supply or remove the DC.I
> think the regulations say the AC side.
>
> Anyway, if the NTC resistor doesn't have a chance to cool before you
> switch power on again (and they do get very hot) then the next power cycle,
> which may only be 15 seconds after power off, now presents full current
> into the system as if the inrush limiter wasn't there.  Assuming the input
> filters on the DC side have completely discharged.  And then pop goes the
> fuse or circuit breaker.
>
> That's why I used the relay to bypass a series resistor.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: July-29-21 11:02 AM
> > To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 17:58, Chris Albertson 
> wrote:
> >
> > > The way to deal with inrush today is to use a thermistor on the
> > > high-current side of the transformer.
> >
> > They start to become hard to spec when you are working with
> > steady-state power input of a few kW, though.
> >
> > I tried to use one for my servo power supply, and decided that I
> > couldn't find one that was up to the job..
> >
> > --
> > atp
> > "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> > designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> > lunatics."
> > � George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-29 Thread Gene Heskett
On Thursday 29 July 2021 12:55:29 Chris Albertson wrote:

> THis is actualy "on topic" for CNC controllers, read on.  I've got a
> good link below.
>
> I have an interest in old tube amplifiers.  They went out of style
> before I was old enough to know much and they never covered tubes when
> I was in school.   But there is an email group about tube technology
> and many books available.  I've learned to design audio amps and such.
>  They are not hard at all, much easier than solid-state audio design. 
> Inrush current is a small problem with large tube amplifies and other
> kinds of power supplies.
>
> The way to deal with inrush today is to use a thermistor on the
> high-current side of the transformer. (this applies to both linear and
> switching supplies) These have about 1 Ohm resistance when hot and 100
> Ohms when cold and you size them so their temperature follows the
> inrush current profile.   They look like large size ceramic disk
> capacitors (If you remember those)  Think of a coin with legs made of
> wire.  They are thin disk-shaped for thermal reasons so you never see
> them surface mounted.
>
> The thermisters are used in almost every modern electronic device that
> uses AC mains power.  Any TV set, monitor, computer power supply,
> audio gear, you name it, if you look inside you find one.  Anything
> made in the last 30 years.
>
> These devices are cheap and ultra-reliable.  You can use them any
> place there is a high surge current and you want to limit the peak
> current. When they are cold the resistance is high so they limit
> current but after a specified time the resistance drops.  It is like
> if you switched in a resister then took it out, but it is analog and
> continuous, not switched, and also 100X more reliable and 1000x
> cheaper.

I will argue that point, Chris. When I was doing consumer electronics 
servicing in the later 40's thru the early 60's, that little gismo was 
the most common failure in consumer electronics by a factor of least 2, 
and its nearest competitor for that title was of course the low voltage 
electrolytic capacitor. In the tv's they used it to time the color tubes 
degausing coils by using also a varistor so as this thing warmed up, the 
voltage drop was no longer great enough to get thru the varister to 
drive the coil. So if everything worked, you had a nice clean color pix 
by the time the tube heater got warmed up and gave you a picture.

That is, if everything worked. But those things did everything but start 
a fire and I expect some did, but the service shop never saw those, they 
went straight to the dump.

Because of that experience, and the fact that they were never seen in 
broadcast gear which is typically turned on once in its life but is 
expected to work when it is used portably, I would never consider using 
one in my own designs.

Period, end of discussion.

The call backs and general unpleasantness they created is one of the 
reasons I closed up shop and went to broadcast engineering full time in 
the early 60's after I got my 1st phone ticket. which I got without 
cracking a book.

And I did the same thing in '72, passing the CET test, missing 2 of the 
125 questions given by a prof at Norfolk Community College who was 
teaching a class designed to generate new CET's because in several years 
of teaching it, not a single one of his students had passed the final. 

His problem as he obviously was not schooled in the subject, he was 
teaching by rote.

I also made a 98 on the AFQT the armed forces were using in 1952, the 
middle of the Korean war.

That did not go well as it got me classified 4F, they knew full well I 
would not follow orders to march out in front of a rattling machine gun 
just because some sargeant ordered me to. So that officer would have to 
shoot me for disobeying an order and then send me home in a box. That 
ended my dreams of furthering my education via the GI bill.  So to this 
day, the closest I can claim to a high school diploma, is a GED. But if 
you want to discuss relativity, you will find me pretty knowledgeable as 
I have observed it for years while keeping a uhf transmitter on the air. 

Relativities effects on the speed's vs mass of an electron are on full 
display as the source of such a klystron based transmitters major 
distortion. We did not then know how to compensate for distortions in 
time, only in amplitude, but we've since learned how or you wouldn't 
have the tv's clarity you have today. We've also invented better high 
powered tubes with less of it because they are shorter. And somewhat 
cheaper. The last time I negotiated the purchase of a klystron, a 
4KM100LA, it was $125,000.

> You can place the device on either side of a transformer, but
> typically on the side with the lower voltage as it will have the most
> current.  Heat is "i squared r" and you want to heat these things.
>
> Now the best part.   If you are a hobbyist or make prototype or
> one-off equipment like most of us here, 

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-29 Thread John Dammeyer
I looked at using the NTC resistors to limit inrush.  I have some but never 
used them for this.  The issue is simple as they are meant for systems that 
have high inrush and are then powered continuously for a long period of time.   
(Like an old style Tube based TV or Radio).

That may also well be true of CNC systems too but all too often I've also had 
to switch off the power and switch it on again.  For example, does the ESTOP 
remove the AC input to the high voltage supply or remove the DC.I think the 
regulations say the AC side.  

Anyway, if the NTC resistor doesn't have a chance to cool before you switch 
power on again (and they do get very hot) then the next power cycle, which may 
only be 15 seconds after power off, now presents full current into the system 
as if the inrush limiter wasn't there.  Assuming the input filters on the DC 
side have completely discharged.  And then pop goes the fuse or circuit breaker.

That's why I used the relay to bypass a series resistor.

John




> -Original Message-
> From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
> Sent: July-29-21 11:02 AM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions
> 
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 17:58, Chris Albertson  
> wrote:
> 
> > The way to deal with inrush today is to use a thermistor on the
> > high-current side of the transformer.
> 
> They start to become hard to spec when you are working with
> steady-state power input of a few kW, though.
> 
> I tried to use one for my servo power supply, and decided that I
> couldn't find one that was up to the job..
> 
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."
> � George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
> 
> 
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-29 Thread Chris Albertson
Talk to the people at Ametherm.  Sometimes you use them as sensors to
control something else like a MOSFET.I am far from expert at kilowatt
class power supplies.

But I think today if designing something like that where a multi-KW supply
is involved they use microcontrollers and sensors so the startup is
sequenced.

Most of my work now uses LiPo battery power.  Surge is an issue there too
as these batteries, even a small handheld one can source 100+ amps and
instantly vaporize #8 wire.  I use fuses to protect the wire as a backup to
something smarter as fires are really bad when it comes to lithium
batteries.I tried to put out a burning battery once - basically, all
you can do is move it outdoors and wait. This surge issue just does not
go away.

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:05 AM andy pugh  wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 17:58, Chris Albertson 
> wrote:
>
> > The way to deal with inrush today is to use a thermistor on the
> > high-current side of the transformer.
>
> They start to become hard to spec when you are working with
> steady-state power input of a few kW, though.
>
> I tried to use one for my servo power supply, and decided that I
> couldn't find one that was up to the job..
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."
> — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-29 Thread andy pugh
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 at 17:58, Chris Albertson  wrote:

> The way to deal with inrush today is to use a thermistor on the
> high-current side of the transformer.

They start to become hard to spec when you are working with
steady-state power input of a few kW, though.

I tried to use one for my servo power supply, and decided that I
couldn't find one that was up to the job..

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-29 Thread Chris Albertson
THis is actualy "on topic" for CNC controllers, read on.  I've got a good
link below.

I have an interest in old tube amplifiers.  They went out of style before I
was old enough to know much and they never covered tubes when I was in
school.   But there is an email group about tube technology and many books
available.  I've learned to design audio amps and such.  They are not hard
at all, much easier than solid-state audio design.  Inrush current is a
small problem with large tube amplifies and other kinds of power supplies.

The way to deal with inrush today is to use a thermistor on the
high-current side of the transformer. (this applies to both linear and
switching supplies) These have about 1 Ohm resistance when hot and 100 Ohms
when cold and you size them so their temperature follows the inrush current
profile.   They look like large size ceramic disk capacitors (If you
remember those)  Think of a coin with legs made of wire.  They are thin
disk-shaped for thermal reasons so you never see them surface mounted.

The thermisters are used in almost every modern electronic device that
uses AC mains power.  Any TV set, monitor, computer power supply, audio
gear, you name it, if you look inside you find one.  Anything made in the
last 30 years.

These devices are cheap and ultra-reliable.  You can use them any place
there is a high surge current and you want to limit the peak current.
 When they are cold the resistance is high so they limit current but after
a specified time the resistance drops.  It is like if you switched in a
resister then took it out, but it is analog and continuous, not switched,
and also 100X more reliable and 1000x cheaper.

You can place the device on either side of a transformer, but typically on
the side with the lower voltage as it will have the most current.  Heat is
"i squared r" and you want to heat these things.

Now the best part.   If you are a hobbyist or make prototype or one-off
equipment like most of us here, Ametherm will give you a lifetime supply of
different kinds of thermistors for free as samples.  They have a ton of
educational material and online calculators on their web side and their
engineers will talk to you.
https://www.ametherm.com/

These devices are not total magic but when combined with surge
suppression diodes will keep surges, static electric charge and back EMI
from crossing between devices. Assiadall modern electronics use these and
for good reason.

You can also do things like epoxy one to a heat sink (or a motor frame) and
then it will provide a voltage based on temperature.  They are simpler to
use than other methods. Ametherm will give you a dozen out two for the
asking.

My first application was on the AC mains side of a vacuum tube-based amp
Makes a very nice "slow start" when you turn it on.   That and some other
ideas allow people today to build tube gear that greatly outperforms the
old 1960s stuff.


On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 3:26 PM Gene Heskett  wrote:

> On Wednesday 28 July 2021 15:25:01 Chris Albertson wrote:
>
> > Do you really need to worry about inrush tripping the breaker?
> > 1) If the DC supply is the old linear type, it will have a very large
> > filter capacitor and supply peak loads without a large AC draw.  The
> > trick is to turn on the supply and then the motor a second later.
>
> Now, imagine that supply consists of 4 toroid transformers each capable
> of developing the nominally 63 volts plus and minus, for a 1 kw analog
> audio amp. and the filter caps are 6 in each supply of 9200 uf at 65
> volts, and each transformer is treated as a single supply. wired two in
> parallel and two tall for a combined voltage of around 126 volts and
> 220800 uf. Plug that into a 30 amp breaker and flip the switch.
> clunkiest switch you ever heard because that 30 amp breaker went down
> like a shotgun on the first half cycle of power, essentially
> simultaneous with the click of the switch. So I hit the junkbox and come
> up with two 40 amp SSR's and a 50 ohm 200 watt resistor, added a couple
> time delays controlled by hal and driven by the F2 state such that the
> 50 ohm is in series with the supply line for the first 4 seconds and is
> shorted after that. Now it runs fine on a 15 amp breaker, but will trip
> it if I ignore the motors chirping because the pwm-servo is set to about
> 17 amps but it takes several seconds, so I settled for a 20 amp in that
> slot.
>
> And for Ralph's problem with the Washington inspectors, I suspect they
> are reading the rules wrong, here they don't care about the load, the
> only thing they checked outside of the box was the ground wiring to the
> rods.
>
> And for lack of any other pressing duties, helped me bore 2 holes thru
> about 8" of green concrete the required 6 feet apart to make it meet
> code.  After he ok'd hooking up the drop so we had power to run the
> hammerdrill.
>
> Cheers Chris, Gene Heskett
> --
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>  soap, ballot, jury, and 

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-29 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 28 July 2021 23:08:48 John Dammeyer wrote:

> Gene is right.  The input surge from transformers and capacitors can
> be quite major.  To get around that I build a couple of circuits to
> slow down the input surge and to also clamp over voltage from
> decelerating DC servos plus drain the caps of the 105VDC quickly so
> that it was safe to work on.
>
> http://www.autoartisans.com/mill/drawings/MillCNCDrawings.html
>
> The above link is to my dirty laundry so to speak.  Essentially I put
> a 47 Ohm 10W resistor in series with the primary winding on power up. 

It will also serve as a fuse in the event the circuit malfunctions :) My 
200 watter will survive if one of the SSR's shorts. Or fails to trigger.  
And is simpler as well because except for the SSR's, its all in the .hal 
recipe. In fact on that machine, I'm doing it twice as I also limit the 
first seconds inrush to the switching supplies that run all the steppers 
and servo's on that machine. Again using a scrap box part, in that case 
a 10 ohm 70 watt but the rest is the same.  I'm a great fan of having 
leftover i/o pins specifically so I can do such tricks as the need 
arises.
 
> How long it's there is based on the PIC controller that also runs the
> high voltage clamp and drain circuit.
>
I haven't worried about that surge at reversal time, it hits about 170 
volts, but since its used up re-accelerating the motor in the reverse 
direction, the 130 volt rating of two 65 volt caps in series has been 
totally not a problem as the overvoltage is gone again in 50 to 75 
milliseconds. The caps, being electrolytic, may in fact leak at that 
point but its such short term there is no detectable heating. Basically 
it just serves to keeping the caps well formed. Been doing it for 5 or 6 
years now.

In fact, I've had to profile that turnaround, slowing it some, to get rid 
of the z following error because it can't reverse direction as fast as 
the spindle can, by running the drive to the pwmgen thru a limit3. The 
actual direction change is held up until the motor is stopped. And I can 
still reverse the spindle at 3000 rpm in <400 milliseconds. hal is a 
very helpful tool, you could even have it make your coffee. That 
wouldn't be any more complex than coding up a tool changer.

> John Dammeyer
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net]
> > Sent: July-28-21 3:24 PM
> > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions
> >
> > On Wednesday 28 July 2021 15:25:01 Chris Albertson wrote:
> > > Do you really need to worry about inrush tripping the breaker?
> > > 1) If the DC supply is the old linear type, it will have a very
> > > large filter capacitor and supply peak loads without a large AC
> > > draw.  The trick is to turn on the supply and then the motor a
> > > second later.
> >
> > Now, imagine that supply consists of 4 toroid transformers each
> > capable of developing the nominally 63 volts plus and minus, for a 1
> > kw analog audio amp. and the filter caps are 6 in each supply of
> > 9200 uf at 65 volts, and each transformer is treated as a single
> > supply. wired two in parallel and two tall for a combined voltage of
> > around 126 volts and 220800 uf. Plug that into a 30 amp breaker and
> > flip the switch. clunkiest switch you ever heard because that 30 amp
> > breaker went down like a shotgun on the first half cycle of power,
> > essentially simultaneous with the click of the switch. So I hit the
> > junkbox and come up with two 40 amp SSR's and a 50 ohm 200 watt
> > resistor, added a couple time delays controlled by hal and driven by
> > the F2 state such that the 50 ohm is in series with the supply line
> > for the first 4 seconds and is shorted after that. Now it runs fine
> > on a 15 amp breaker, but will trip it if I ignore the motors
> > chirping because the pwm-servo is set to about 17 amps but it takes
> > several seconds, so I settled for a 20 amp in that slot.
> >
> > And for Ralph's problem with the Washington inspectors, I suspect
> > they are reading the rules wrong, here they don't care about the
> > load, the only thing they checked outside of the box was the ground
> > wiring to the rods.
> >
> > And for lack of any other pressing duties, helped me bore 2 holes
> > thru about 8" of green concrete the required 6 feet apart to make it
> > meet code.  After he ok'd hooking up the drop so we had power to run
> > the hammerdrill.
> >
> > Cheers Chris, Gene Heskett
> > --
> > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> >  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
&

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-28 Thread John Dammeyer
Gene is right.  The input surge from transformers and capacitors can be quite 
major.  To get around that I build a couple of circuits to slow down the input 
surge and to also clamp over voltage from decelerating DC servos plus drain the 
caps of the 105VDC quickly so that it was safe to work on.

http://www.autoartisans.com/mill/drawings/MillCNCDrawings.html

The above link is to my dirty laundry so to speak.  Essentially I put a 47 Ohm 
10W resistor in series with the primary winding on power up.  How long it's 
there is based on the PIC controller that also runs the high voltage clamp and 
drain circuit.

John Dammeyer


> -Original Message-
> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:ghesk...@shentel.net]
> Sent: July-28-21 3:24 PM
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions
> 
> On Wednesday 28 July 2021 15:25:01 Chris Albertson wrote:
> 
> > Do you really need to worry about inrush tripping the breaker?
> > 1) If the DC supply is the old linear type, it will have a very large
> > filter capacitor and supply peak loads without a large AC draw.  The
> > trick is to turn on the supply and then the motor a second later.
> 
> Now, imagine that supply consists of 4 toroid transformers each capable
> of developing the nominally 63 volts plus and minus, for a 1 kw analog
> audio amp. and the filter caps are 6 in each supply of 9200 uf at 65
> volts, and each transformer is treated as a single supply. wired two in
> parallel and two tall for a combined voltage of around 126 volts and
> 220800 uf. Plug that into a 30 amp breaker and flip the switch.
> clunkiest switch you ever heard because that 30 amp breaker went down
> like a shotgun on the first half cycle of power, essentially
> simultaneous with the click of the switch. So I hit the junkbox and come
> up with two 40 amp SSR's and a 50 ohm 200 watt resistor, added a couple
> time delays controlled by hal and driven by the F2 state such that the
> 50 ohm is in series with the supply line for the first 4 seconds and is
> shorted after that. Now it runs fine on a 15 amp breaker, but will trip
> it if I ignore the motors chirping because the pwm-servo is set to about
> 17 amps but it takes several seconds, so I settled for a 20 amp in that
> slot.
> 
> And for Ralph's problem with the Washington inspectors, I suspect they
> are reading the rules wrong, here they don't care about the load, the
> only thing they checked outside of the box was the ground wiring to the
> rods.
> 
> And for lack of any other pressing duties, helped me bore 2 holes thru
> about 8" of green concrete the required 6 feet apart to make it meet
> code.  After he ok'd hooking up the drop so we had power to run the
> hammerdrill.
> 
> Cheers Chris, Gene Heskett
> --
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
>  - Louis D. Brandeis
> Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
> 
> 
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 28 July 2021 15:25:01 Chris Albertson wrote:

> Do you really need to worry about inrush tripping the breaker?
> 1) If the DC supply is the old linear type, it will have a very large
> filter capacitor and supply peak loads without a large AC draw.  The
> trick is to turn on the supply and then the motor a second later.

Now, imagine that supply consists of 4 toroid transformers each capable 
of developing the nominally 63 volts plus and minus, for a 1 kw analog 
audio amp. and the filter caps are 6 in each supply of 9200 uf at 65 
volts, and each transformer is treated as a single supply. wired two in 
parallel and two tall for a combined voltage of around 126 volts and 
220800 uf. Plug that into a 30 amp breaker and flip the switch.  
clunkiest switch you ever heard because that 30 amp breaker went down 
like a shotgun on the first half cycle of power, essentially 
simultaneous with the click of the switch. So I hit the junkbox and come 
up with two 40 amp SSR's and a 50 ohm 200 watt resistor, added a couple 
time delays controlled by hal and driven by the F2 state such that the 
50 ohm is in series with the supply line for the first 4 seconds and is 
shorted after that. Now it runs fine on a 15 amp breaker, but will trip 
it if I ignore the motors chirping because the pwm-servo is set to about 
17 amps but it takes several seconds, so I settled for a 20 amp in that 
slot.

And for Ralph's problem with the Washington inspectors, I suspect they 
are reading the rules wrong, here they don't care about the load, the 
only thing they checked outside of the box was the ground wiring to the 
rods.

And for lack of any other pressing duties, helped me bore 2 holes thru 
about 8" of green concrete the required 6 feet apart to make it meet 
code.  After he ok'd hooking up the drop so we had power to run the 
hammerdrill. 

Cheers Chris, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-28 Thread Chris Albertson
Do you really need to worry about inrush tripping the breaker?
1) If the DC supply is the old linear type, it will have a very large
filter capacitor and supply peak loads without a large AC draw.  The trick
is to turn on the supply and then the motor a second later.
2) Most breakers have a time constant and will delay tripping for some
milliseconds.
3) The better solution is a bigger breaker and larger wire.

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:20 AM Gene Heskett  wrote:

> On Wednesday 28 July 2021 12:57:30 Earl Weaver wrote:
>
> > **I took some voltage readings on the field windings F1 and F2.
> > This is on the edge of my experience with electrical testing,
> > so you may need to coach me with getting the readings that you need.
> >
> > Motor stopped:
> >  From Ground to F1 = +107.9 -  Ground to F2 = -107.8
> > Leads on F1 and F2 = 215.0
> >
> > Motor @ 50 RPM :
> >  From Ground to F1 = +107.5 -  Ground to F2 = -107.4
> > Leads on F1 and F2 = 214.4
> >
> > Motor stalled:
> >  From Ground to F1 = +105.7 -  Ground to F2 = -105.5
> >
> > I have noticed if the main power disconnect switch is let on the
> > machine for a length of time, the motor will feel hot to the touch.
> > Is this normal? The F1 and F2 wires show voltage anytime the main
> > power disconnect switch is on.
> >
> > It appears to me that this is the original motor supplied with the
> > lathe.
> >
> Since that motor is shown with a max field currant of 3 amps, and you
> have nominally 215 volts available, the resistance of that winding s/b
> in the 72 ohm area. Can you disconnect it and measure that ohmage?
>
> Also as a side comment, I disable all power to the machine when motion is
> off, making linuxcnc running AND motion (F2) on as the power switch for
> the whole thing, but I get cute with time delays, so the turn on is
> current limited for about 4 seconds by a big high wattage resistor
> allowing a much smaller circuit breaker since the inrush at turn-on is
> limited. And in your case if the field winding is good, add an off delay
> for the field circuit AC power src using $11 HOYMC SSR's which you can
> control from a std bob card or whatever. Delay long enough that the
> instantly turned off AC power to the armature supply has decayed to
> where the spin-up by shutting down the field supply is no longer a
> problem.
>
> That is why they didn't turn it off at all in the first place.
>
> But its also a 645 watt load on the power bill anytime the breaker is on,
> and that 645 watts is the major source of the motors heating when on. A
> couple rough service 120 volt light bulbs of lower wattage, in series
> added across the 215 dc to the armature will hasten the demise of that
> power to a safer level by acting as bleeders, and tell you how long you
> need to delay the field shutdown. Say 10 seconds after the bulbs have
> gone dark, if that's not enough, and the motor still jerks, add another
> 5 or 10 to the delay time via the setp in the hal file that sets that.
> Or use higher wattage bulbs for a quicker drain. Get back to me if you
> need to when that time comes.
>
> You could get even cuter and turn the light bulbs off with a relay when
> the motion is enabled. No delays in that circuit needed, and the bulbs
> should come on and then fade with the F2 that toggles it off.
>
> And leave LinuxCNC running, or make sure the machine is dead before
> stopping it. I tally that stuff with pyvcp leds in my axis gui.
>
> > **Earl Weaver
> > Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 
> >
> > On 7/28/2021 9:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 28 July 2021 05:33:46 andy pugh wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 00:46, Gene Heskett 
> > >
> > > wrote:
> >  Yes, this is an approx. 1984 machine.
> > >>>
> > >>> That new? I would have guessed 1934, the year I was born. That
> > >>> means of making a variable speed motor is ancient tech because its
> > >>> not very efficient.
> > >>
> > >> I think you are maybe thinking of the Ward Leonard set, as used on
> > >> the early Monarch 10EE, where an AC motor ran a DC generator which,
> > >> in turn ran a DC motor.
> > >> That is pretty old-tech, but a DC motor with solid state drive is
> > >> hardly old-school at all (only the use of field coils is slightly
> > >> outdated at that motor size)
> > >
> > > Even with my broadcast history, big motors in the 10 to 25 HP range
> > > have always been std 3 phase. I've only read about using the control
> > > of speed via the field currant applied, and here I probably need to
> > > mention just for the record that loss of field leaves the motor
> > > running on residual magnetism in that old steel, and if unloaded,
> > > will spin up till it explodes. If loaded, it will trip every breaker
> > > back to the fuses on the pole.\
> > >
> > > And having some experience with that, I would not bet more than 50
> > > cents that they would actually break the circuit, I've been witness
> > > on two occasions when it did not, the ceramic tube 

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-28 Thread Scott Harwell via Emc-users
 The motor will warm up due to the field supply. The motor name plate shows the 
field current change from cold to warm. You might have a better idea on current 
looking at the AC supply rather than A1 and A2. All current should be DC to the 
motor. 

On Wednesday, July 28, 2021, 11:59:31 AM CDT, Earl Weaver 
 wrote:  
 
 **I took some voltage readings on the field windings F1 and F2.
This is on the edge of my experience with electrical testing,
so you may need to coach me with getting the readings that you need.

Motor stopped:
 From Ground to F1 = +107.9 -  Ground to F2 = -107.8
Leads on F1 and F2 = 215.0

Motor @ 50 RPM :
 From Ground to F1 = +107.5 -  Ground to F2 = -107.4
Leads on F1 and F2 = 214.4

Motor stalled:
 From Ground to F1 = +105.7 -  Ground to F2 = -105.5

I have noticed if the main power disconnect switch is let on the machine 
for a length of time, the motor will feel hot to the touch.
Is this normal? The F1 and F2 wires show voltage anytime the main power 
disconnect switch is on.

It appears to me that this is the original motor supplied with the lathe.

**Earl Weaver
Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 

On 7/28/2021 9:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 July 2021 05:33:46 andy pugh wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 00:46, Gene Heskett 
> wrote:
 Yes, this is an approx. 1984 machine.
>>> That new? I would have guessed 1934, the year I was born. That means
>>> of making a variable speed motor is ancient tech because its not
>>> very efficient.
>> I think you are maybe thinking of the Ward Leonard set, as used on the
>> early Monarch 10EE, where an AC motor ran a DC generator which, in
>> turn ran a DC motor.
>> That is pretty old-tech, but a DC motor with solid state drive is
>> hardly old-school at all (only the use of field coils is slightly
>> outdated at that motor size)
>>
> Even with my broadcast history, big motors in the 10 to 25 HP range have
> always been std 3 phase. I've only read about using the control of speed
> via the field currant applied, and here I probably need to mention just
> for the record that loss of field leaves the motor running on residual
> magnetism in that old steel, and if unloaded, will spin up till it
> explodes. If loaded, it will trip every breaker back to the fuses on the
> pole.\
>
> And having some experience with that, I would not bet more than 50 cents
> that they would actually break the circuit, I've been witness on two
> occasions when it did not, the ceramic tube containing that fuse had
> blown so many times that it was metal plated on the inside and failed to
> open the 7200 volt line, eventually throwing hot pieces into the grass
> below the pole, causing fires we had to stomp out. We also had to
> replace 4 750mcm cables from the substation cans on the pole, into and
> thru the weather head, and on into the distribution bus inside the
> building. That building, which preceded the NEC by a couple decades, had
> no entrance breaker, and an open transmitter door by a curious new
> operator crowbared a 4000 lb plate transformer, and a GE AK-225 breaker
> feeding that transformer failed to open from old age, which led to the
> 7.5 amp fuse wires in the poles flag switches to try and open.
>
> Thank $DIETY we had a spare transformer so we were only off the air
> something under 3 days.  Just one of the BTDT's over my nearly 40 years
> in broadcast engineering.
>
>>> An AC motor and a vfd should cut the energy bill in half
>>> compared to that.
>> But will have less low-speed torque. Bear in mind that the lathe is
>> geared for 2500rpm and was probably running at 250rpm (steel part 8"
>> dia, carbide tooling)
> I had assumed a change in the gearing to address that. Probablt with
> stuff from Tractor Supply.  At 2500 revs, throwing swarf, I'd want a
> metal wall between that swarf and me. That stuff would be start a fire
> hot.
>
>> A VFD would be down at 5Hz to achieve that.
> Which I am doing on my ancient Sheldon. With torque enough to cut a 10
> thou chip with a carbide tool. At 100 revs, the vfd is at 16HZ. Bring in
> the backgear and I can turn the house around.
>
>> I think that a DC motor is appropriate here, but probably a PM servo
>> motor would be better.
> I won't argue that. Both of my brushed PMDC motors are getting long in
> the tooth and running fine on the OEM brushes.  And don't have a minimum
> speed other than enough to overcome friction. And the motors FLA torque
> is available down to zero speed. Temp rise limits with time at low fan
> speeds will eventually wave a hand at you of course. Generally the job
> is done by then, but its a consideration not to be ignored.
>
>> Is this the motor originally supplied with the lathe?
> I suspect it is, but Earl would have to answer that.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
  

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-28 Thread andy pugh
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 19:20, Gene Heskett  wrote:

> Since that motor is shown with a max field current of 3 amps,

I think that was the drive current. Motor current seems to be rather
lower, 0.64A

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 28 July 2021 12:57:30 Earl Weaver wrote:

> **I took some voltage readings on the field windings F1 and F2.
> This is on the edge of my experience with electrical testing,
> so you may need to coach me with getting the readings that you need.
>
> Motor stopped:
>  From Ground to F1 = +107.9 -  Ground to F2 = -107.8
> Leads on F1 and F2 = 215.0
>
> Motor @ 50 RPM :
>  From Ground to F1 = +107.5 -  Ground to F2 = -107.4
> Leads on F1 and F2 = 214.4
>
> Motor stalled:
>  From Ground to F1 = +105.7 -  Ground to F2 = -105.5
>
> I have noticed if the main power disconnect switch is let on the
> machine for a length of time, the motor will feel hot to the touch.
> Is this normal? The F1 and F2 wires show voltage anytime the main
> power disconnect switch is on.
>
> It appears to me that this is the original motor supplied with the
> lathe.
>
Since that motor is shown with a max field currant of 3 amps, and you 
have nominally 215 volts available, the resistance of that winding s/b 
in the 72 ohm area. Can you disconnect it and measure that ohmage?

Also as a side comment, I disable all power to the machine when motion is 
off, making linuxcnc running AND motion (F2) on as the power switch for 
the whole thing, but I get cute with time delays, so the turn on is 
current limited for about 4 seconds by a big high wattage resistor 
allowing a much smaller circuit breaker since the inrush at turn-on is 
limited. And in your case if the field winding is good, add an off delay 
for the field circuit AC power src using $11 HOYMC SSR's which you can 
control from a std bob card or whatever. Delay long enough that the 
instantly turned off AC power to the armature supply has decayed to 
where the spin-up by shutting down the field supply is no longer a 
problem.

That is why they didn't turn it off at all in the first place.

But its also a 645 watt load on the power bill anytime the breaker is on, 
and that 645 watts is the major source of the motors heating when on. A 
couple rough service 120 volt light bulbs of lower wattage, in series 
added across the 215 dc to the armature will hasten the demise of that 
power to a safer level by acting as bleeders, and tell you how long you 
need to delay the field shutdown. Say 10 seconds after the bulbs have 
gone dark, if that's not enough, and the motor still jerks, add another 
5 or 10 to the delay time via the setp in the hal file that sets that. 
Or use higher wattage bulbs for a quicker drain. Get back to me if you 
need to when that time comes.

You could get even cuter and turn the light bulbs off with a relay when 
the motion is enabled. No delays in that circuit needed, and the bulbs 
should come on and then fade with the F2 that toggles it off.

And leave LinuxCNC running, or make sure the machine is dead before 
stopping it. I tally that stuff with pyvcp leds in my axis gui.

> **Earl Weaver
> Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 
>
> On 7/28/2021 9:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 July 2021 05:33:46 andy pugh wrote:
> >> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 00:46, Gene Heskett 
> >
> > wrote:
>  Yes, this is an approx. 1984 machine.
> >>>
> >>> That new? I would have guessed 1934, the year I was born. That
> >>> means of making a variable speed motor is ancient tech because its
> >>> not very efficient.
> >>
> >> I think you are maybe thinking of the Ward Leonard set, as used on
> >> the early Monarch 10EE, where an AC motor ran a DC generator which,
> >> in turn ran a DC motor.
> >> That is pretty old-tech, but a DC motor with solid state drive is
> >> hardly old-school at all (only the use of field coils is slightly
> >> outdated at that motor size)
> >
> > Even with my broadcast history, big motors in the 10 to 25 HP range
> > have always been std 3 phase. I've only read about using the control
> > of speed via the field currant applied, and here I probably need to
> > mention just for the record that loss of field leaves the motor
> > running on residual magnetism in that old steel, and if unloaded,
> > will spin up till it explodes. If loaded, it will trip every breaker
> > back to the fuses on the pole.\
> >
> > And having some experience with that, I would not bet more than 50
> > cents that they would actually break the circuit, I've been witness
> > on two occasions when it did not, the ceramic tube containing that
> > fuse had blown so many times that it was metal plated on the inside
> > and failed to open the 7200 volt line, eventually throwing hot
> > pieces into the grass below the pole, causing fires we had to stomp
> > out. We also had to replace 4 750mcm cables from the substation cans
> > on the pole, into and thru the weather head, and on into the
> > distribution bus inside the building. That building, which preceded
> > the NEC by a couple decades, had no entrance breaker, and an open
> > transmitter door by a curious new operator crowbared a 4000 lb plate
> > transformer, and a GE AK-225 breaker 

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-28 Thread andy pugh
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 18:00, Earl Weaver  wrote:

> I have noticed if the main power disconnect switch is let on the machine
> for a length of time, the motor will feel hot to the touch.
> Is this normal?

Yes, if the field windings are permanently powered on.
The motor rating plate says that the insulation is class F:

"Class F insulation consists of materials or combinations of materials
such as mica, glass fibre, asbestos, etc., with suitable bonding,
impregnating or coating substances, as well as other materials or
combinations of materials, not necessarily inorganic, which by
experience or tests can be shown to be capable of operation at the
Class F temperature (materials possessing a degree of thermal
stability allowing them to be operated at a temperature 25 Centigrade
degrees higher than Class B materials).
Maximum allowed temperature: (IEC60034-1 & NEMA MG1-12.43): 155C, 311F."

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-28 Thread Earl Weaver

**I took some voltage readings on the field windings F1 and F2.
This is on the edge of my experience with electrical testing,
so you may need to coach me with getting the readings that you need.

Motor stopped:
From Ground to F1 = +107.9 -  Ground to F2 = -107.8
Leads on F1 and F2 = 215.0

Motor @ 50 RPM :
From Ground to F1 = +107.5 -  Ground to F2 = -107.4
Leads on F1 and F2 = 214.4

Motor stalled:
From Ground to F1 = +105.7 -  Ground to F2 = -105.5

I have noticed if the main power disconnect switch is let on the machine 
for a length of time, the motor will feel hot to the touch.
Is this normal? The F1 and F2 wires show voltage anytime the main power 
disconnect switch is on.


It appears to me that this is the original motor supplied with the lathe.

**Earl Weaver
Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 

On 7/28/2021 9:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:

On Wednesday 28 July 2021 05:33:46 andy pugh wrote:


On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 00:46, Gene Heskett 

wrote:

Yes, this is an approx. 1984 machine.

That new? I would have guessed 1934, the year I was born. That means
of making a variable speed motor is ancient tech because its not
very efficient.

I think you are maybe thinking of the Ward Leonard set, as used on the
early Monarch 10EE, where an AC motor ran a DC generator which, in
turn ran a DC motor.
That is pretty old-tech, but a DC motor with solid state drive is
hardly old-school at all (only the use of field coils is slightly
outdated at that motor size)


Even with my broadcast history, big motors in the 10 to 25 HP range have
always been std 3 phase. I've only read about using the control of speed
via the field currant applied, and here I probably need to mention just
for the record that loss of field leaves the motor running on residual
magnetism in that old steel, and if unloaded, will spin up till it
explodes. If loaded, it will trip every breaker back to the fuses on the
pole.\

And having some experience with that, I would not bet more than 50 cents
that they would actually break the circuit, I've been witness on two
occasions when it did not, the ceramic tube containing that fuse had
blown so many times that it was metal plated on the inside and failed to
open the 7200 volt line, eventually throwing hot pieces into the grass
below the pole, causing fires we had to stomp out. We also had to
replace 4 750mcm cables from the substation cans on the pole, into and
thru the weather head, and on into the distribution bus inside the
building. That building, which preceded the NEC by a couple decades, had
no entrance breaker, and an open transmitter door by a curious new
operator crowbared a 4000 lb plate transformer, and a GE AK-225 breaker
feeding that transformer failed to open from old age, which led to the
7.5 amp fuse wires in the poles flag switches to try and open.

Thank $DIETY we had a spare transformer so we were only off the air
something under 3 days.  Just one of the BTDT's over my nearly 40 years
in broadcast engineering.


An AC motor and a vfd should cut the energy bill in half
compared to that.

But will have less low-speed torque. Bear in mind that the lathe is
geared for 2500rpm and was probably running at 250rpm (steel part 8"
dia, carbide tooling)

I had assumed a change in the gearing to address that. Probablt with
stuff from Tractor Supply.  At 2500 revs, throwing swarf, I'd want a
metal wall between that swarf and me. That stuff would be start a fire
hot.


A VFD would be down at 5Hz to achieve that.

Which I am doing on my ancient Sheldon. With torque enough to cut a 10
thou chip with a carbide tool. At 100 revs, the vfd is at 16HZ. Bring in
the backgear and I can turn the house around.


I think that a DC motor is appropriate here, but probably a PM servo
motor would be better.

I won't argue that. Both of my brushed PMDC motors are getting long in
the tooth and running fine on the OEM brushes.  And don't have a minimum
speed other than enough to overcome friction. And the motors FLA torque
is available down to zero speed. Temp rise limits with time at low fan
speeds will eventually wave a hand at you of course. Generally the job
is done by then, but its a consideration not to be ignored.


Is this the motor originally supplied with the lathe?

I suspect it is, but Earl would have to answer that.

Cheers, Gene Heskett



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-28 Thread John Dammeyer
The other option of course is just to toss out the motor and switch to say the 
130SM-M1525MAL from Bergerda rated at 3.8kW (divided by 750W/HP) is 5HP at 2500 
RPM.
Runs off 220VAC 13.5A circuit.
With the 2500 line encoder can do step/dir as slow as you want although at 
really slow RPM the torque does drop off a little bit.
http://www.autoartisans.com/MotorDrives/130SeriesACServoMotor.pdf

I'm running a smaller version on my mill the 110AM-M0630MAL which is 1.8kW at 
3000 RPM
http://www.autoartisans.com/MotorDrives/110SeriesACServoMotor.pdf
I had it stall once with 1:1 on the mill when breaking through 1/4" steel place 
with a 1/2" drill bit.  I think I was running 100RPM and the flutes caught and 
the motor faulted as the drill bit locked tight as it broke through.

Changed up to 300 RPM for the rest of the holes without an issue but it may 
have broken through differently at that RPM too.

I do wonder if there's a bit of Sears Horse Power going on here too since 
220VAC * 6A for my motor works out to 1320W which is only 1.76HP and the motor 
is rated as 1.8kW.  But then the motor is also significantly smaller (and 
quieter) than the 2HP single phase heavy cast iron unit it replaced.

In either case, I'm really happy with this motor and drive from Bergerda
http://en.bergerda.com/

I currently have a 3 phase 1HP with VFD on my lathe but if I need really slow 
RPM I still switch in the back gear.  Otherwise with the lowest belt speed and 
the VFD I haven't had problems.  But for my mill a 3 phase 2HP motor, VFD and 
shipping costs were more expensive than the Bergerda.

John

> -Original Message-
> From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
> Sent: July-28-21 2:34 AM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions
> 
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 00:46, Gene Heskett  wrote:
> 
> > > Yes, this is an approx. 1984 machine.
> >
> > That new? I would have guessed 1934, the year I was born. That means of
> > making a variable speed motor is ancient tech because its not very
> > efficient.
> 
> I think you are maybe thinking of the Ward Leonard set, as used on the
> early Monarch 10EE, where an AC motor ran a DC generator which, in
> turn ran a DC motor.
> That is pretty old-tech, but a DC motor with solid state drive is
> hardly old-school at all (only the use of field coils is slightly
> outdated at that motor size)
> 
> > An AC motor and a vfd should cut the energy bill in half
> > compared to that.
> 
> But will have less low-speed torque. Bear in mind that the lathe is
> geared for 2500rpm and was probably running at 250rpm (steel part 8"
> dia, carbide tooling)
> A VFD would be down at 5Hz to achieve that.
> 
> I think that a DC motor is appropriate here, but probably a PM servo
> motor would be better.
> 
> Is this the motor originally supplied with the lathe?
> 
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."
> � George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
> 
> 
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 28 July 2021 05:33:46 andy pugh wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 00:46, Gene Heskett  
wrote:
> > > Yes, this is an approx. 1984 machine.
> >
> > That new? I would have guessed 1934, the year I was born. That means
> > of making a variable speed motor is ancient tech because its not
> > very efficient.
>
> I think you are maybe thinking of the Ward Leonard set, as used on the
> early Monarch 10EE, where an AC motor ran a DC generator which, in
> turn ran a DC motor.
> That is pretty old-tech, but a DC motor with solid state drive is
> hardly old-school at all (only the use of field coils is slightly
> outdated at that motor size)
>
Even with my broadcast history, big motors in the 10 to 25 HP range have 
always been std 3 phase. I've only read about using the control of speed 
via the field currant applied, and here I probably need to mention just 
for the record that loss of field leaves the motor running on residual 
magnetism in that old steel, and if unloaded, will spin up till it 
explodes. If loaded, it will trip every breaker back to the fuses on the 
pole.\

And having some experience with that, I would not bet more than 50 cents 
that they would actually break the circuit, I've been witness on two 
occasions when it did not, the ceramic tube containing that fuse had 
blown so many times that it was metal plated on the inside and failed to 
open the 7200 volt line, eventually throwing hot pieces into the grass 
below the pole, causing fires we had to stomp out. We also had to 
replace 4 750mcm cables from the substation cans on the pole, into and 
thru the weather head, and on into the distribution bus inside the 
building. That building, which preceded the NEC by a couple decades, had 
no entrance breaker, and an open transmitter door by a curious new 
operator crowbared a 4000 lb plate transformer, and a GE AK-225 breaker 
feeding that transformer failed to open from old age, which led to the 
7.5 amp fuse wires in the poles flag switches to try and open.

Thank $DIETY we had a spare transformer so we were only off the air 
something under 3 days.  Just one of the BTDT's over my nearly 40 years 
in broadcast engineering.

> > An AC motor and a vfd should cut the energy bill in half
> > compared to that.
>
> But will have less low-speed torque. Bear in mind that the lathe is
> geared for 2500rpm and was probably running at 250rpm (steel part 8"
> dia, carbide tooling)

I had assumed a change in the gearing to address that. Probablt with 
stuff from Tractor Supply.  At 2500 revs, throwing swarf, I'd want a 
metal wall between that swarf and me. That stuff would be start a fire 
hot.

> A VFD would be down at 5Hz to achieve that.

Which I am doing on my ancient Sheldon. With torque enough to cut a 10 
thou chip with a carbide tool. At 100 revs, the vfd is at 16HZ. Bring in 
the backgear and I can turn the house around.

> I think that a DC motor is appropriate here, but probably a PM servo
> motor would be better.

I won't argue that. Both of my brushed PMDC motors are getting long in 
the tooth and running fine on the OEM brushes.  And don't have a minimum 
speed other than enough to overcome friction. And the motors FLA torque 
is available down to zero speed. Temp rise limits with time at low fan 
speeds will eventually wave a hand at you of course. Generally the job 
is done by then, but its a consideration not to be ignored.

> Is this the motor originally supplied with the lathe?

I suspect it is, but Earl would have to answer that.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-28 Thread andy pugh
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 00:46, Gene Heskett  wrote:

> > Yes, this is an approx. 1984 machine.
>
> That new? I would have guessed 1934, the year I was born. That means of
> making a variable speed motor is ancient tech because its not very
> efficient.

I think you are maybe thinking of the Ward Leonard set, as used on the
early Monarch 10EE, where an AC motor ran a DC generator which, in
turn ran a DC motor.
That is pretty old-tech, but a DC motor with solid state drive is
hardly old-school at all (only the use of field coils is slightly
outdated at that motor size)

> An AC motor and a vfd should cut the energy bill in half
> compared to that.

But will have less low-speed torque. Bear in mind that the lathe is
geared for 2500rpm and was probably running at 250rpm (steel part 8"
dia, carbide tooling)
A VFD would be down at 5Hz to achieve that.

I think that a DC motor is appropriate here, but probably a PM servo
motor would be better.

Is this the motor originally supplied with the lathe?

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 27 July 2021 16:10:40 Earl Weaver wrote:

> On 7/27/2021 1:43 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Actually, the torque goes up as the speed goes down, because they
> > run at the speed determined by the counter emf generated by varying
> > the current in the field winding, and the higher current actually
> > causes it to slow down, but at the same time, the torque rises
> > because the field magnets get stronger, generating the balancing
> > back emf at a lower armature speed. Unfortunately for those motors,
> > the non-grain oriented steel used in those motors is saturated
> > magnetically, at around 1/4 of the magnetic field we can make with
> > todays magnetic materiel. Not very efficient and it shows in the
> > power bill to run it.
> >
> > My bet is that since this is a very old tech, the power supply will
> > have both selenium rectifiers and wet electrolyte filter capacitors,
> > and one, or the other or both have reached their retirement age,
> > like me a long time back, and like me, are no longer working very
> > well.
> >
> > Where are your digs located Earl? I am in north central WV.
> >
> >> **Earl Weaver
> >> Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Emc-users mailing list
> >> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
> > Cheers, Gene Heskett
>
> Gene,
> Yes, this is an approx. 1984 machine.

That new? I would have guessed 1934, the year I was born. That means of 
making a variable speed motor is ancient tech because its not very 
efficient. An AC motor and a vfd should cut the energy bill in half 
compared to that.

> I suspect the drive has seen it's better days. The lathe comes out of
> a tech school, hasn't been used much. Probably sat unused for "years?"
> I converted it from an old Fanuc controller to LinuxCNC.
> Is there a good option for replacing the DC Drive and using the
> existing DC Motor, or am I better off changing to AC VFD?

I think I'd put a 3 phase 5 to 7 horse or so motor in it, geared down by 
about 4/1, with a 7.5 horse vfd, and let the vfd do the speed control. 
I'm doing that twice here from linuxcnc. You can take that 5 or 7 horse 
to at least 200 hz, which will run it a bit more than 3x its normal 
speed. I have a smaller sheldon, an 11x54, that came original with a 3/4 
horse single phase and a batch of shiftable belts. I put a 50 yo 1 horse 
in it after putting fresh bearings into the pair of them I got for a 50 
dollar bill aat a local recyclers yard. Driven from a 250 volt powered 
single phase line, I've shifted it up to 2nd gear once. I can do from 
about 20 rpm to around 600  without shifting gears. And 600 is fast 
enough to start a fire with the flying swarf. But you will have to learn 
how to program the vfd, they are horribly badly tuned straight OOTB.

One of the secrets there is I don't self disable the vfd until its down 
to 5HZ, and its programmed to not exceed the motors nameplate FLA. And 
while that slow kills the effectiveness of its cooling fan, I can run it 
at the limit for half an hour and still lay my hand on the motor w/o 
burning it.

My Sheldon, with that 1 horse motor has had the vfd tweaked, and I can 
watch the overshoot in turns with an 8" 4 jaw mounted so an m4 reversal 
turns it around, measuring the turn from the time motion issues the 
command while its running at 100 revs fwd, to the encoder issuing the 
first reverse motion, and its rarely over .25 turns, usually about .235.

At 500 revs its several full turns, but I don't tap that fast. 

> I'm located up here in central Wisconsin, moved here in 2008 from
> Pennsylvania.
> I've been through West Virginia already. Mountainous? I still like the
> mountains out east!

Went thru the Dells, 70 years ago. Rode the tour in a surplus duck. Nice 
trip.

But I came here in '84, the CBS affiliate needed a Chief Engineer, so I 
finished out my working time there, retiring in the middle of 2002. So 
in addition to the 1st phone, I am also a CET, and those are a lot 
rarer.

We here in WV generally price level dirt by the cost of the dozer 
operator plus the gallons of #2 he burnt making it level. Very little 
naturally level land here.

But first, lets measure the range of this motors FIELD currant so we can 
maybe figure out why its missbehaving.

> **Earl Weaver
> Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 
>
Take care Earl.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread andy pugh
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 21:13, Earl Weaver  wrote:

> Yes, this is an approx. 1984 machine.

It won't have Selenium rectifiers then.

Though I concur that the bus capacitors are very unlikely to be
anywhere near spec by now.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Scott Harwell via Emc-users
 Earl,
I haven't worked anything as small as 5hp but most Vs drives are close. This is 
by memory, but you should not see any field weakening until you hit motor base 
speed. The larger drives always had a shunt on the armature  leads to measure 
current. The tach runs through a summing junction with reference for speed 
regulation. Always remember that total field loss at speed can cause terrible 
things.

Scott

On Tuesday, July 27, 2021, 3:12:51 PM CDT, Earl Weaver 
 wrote:  
 
 
On 7/27/2021 1:43 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Actually, the torque goes up as the speed goes down, because they run at
> the speed determined by the counter emf generated by varying the current
> in the field winding, and the higher current actually causes it to slow
> down, but at the same time, the torque rises because the field magnets
> get stronger, generating the balancing back emf at a lower armature
> speed. Unfortunately for those motors, the non-grain oriented steel used
> in those motors is saturated magnetically, at around 1/4 of the magnetic
> field we can make with todays magnetic materiel. Not very efficient and
> it shows in the power bill to run it.
>
> My bet is that since this is a very old tech, the power supply will have
> both selenium rectifiers and wet electrolyte filter capacitors, and one,
> or the other or both have reached their retirement age, like me a long
> time back, and like me, are no longer working very well.
>
> Where are your digs located Earl? I am in north central WV.
>
>> **Earl Weaver
>> Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Emc-users mailing list
>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
Gene,
Yes, this is an approx. 1984 machine.
I suspect the drive has seen it's better days. The lathe comes out of a 
tech school, hasn't been used much. Probably sat unused for "years?"
I converted it from an old Fanuc controller to LinuxCNC.
Is there a good option for replacing the DC Drive and using the existing 
DC Motor, or am I better off changing to AC VFD?
I'm located up here in central Wisconsin, moved here in 2008 from 
Pennsylvania.
I've been through West Virginia already. Mountainous? I still like the 
mountains out east!

**Earl Weaver
Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
  
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Earl Weaver



On 7/27/2021 1:43 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:

Actually, the torque goes up as the speed goes down, because they run at
the speed determined by the counter emf generated by varying the current
in the field winding, and the higher current actually causes it to slow
down, but at the same time, the torque rises because the field magnets
get stronger, generating the balancing back emf at a lower armature
speed. Unfortunately for those motors, the non-grain oriented steel used
in those motors is saturated magnetically, at around 1/4 of the magnetic
field we can make with todays magnetic materiel. Not very efficient and
it shows in the power bill to run it.

My bet is that since this is a very old tech, the power supply will have
both selenium rectifiers and wet electrolyte filter capacitors, and one,
or the other or both have reached their retirement age, like me a long
time back, and like me, are no longer working very well.

Where are your digs located Earl? I am in north central WV.


**Earl Weaver
Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene Heskett

Gene,
Yes, this is an approx. 1984 machine.
I suspect the drive has seen it's better days. The lathe comes out of a 
tech school, hasn't been used much. Probably sat unused for "years?"

I converted it from an old Fanuc controller to LinuxCNC.
Is there a good option for replacing the DC Drive and using the existing 
DC Motor, or am I better off changing to AC VFD?
I'm located up here in central Wisconsin, moved here in 2008 from 
Pennsylvania.
I've been through West Virginia already. Mountainous? I still like the 
mountains out east!


**Earl Weaver
Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 27 July 2021 14:43:49 Earl Weaver wrote:

> Ok, Here is my attempt at taking amp readings.
> I attached my AC Clamp Meter to lines A1 and A2 going from drive to
> motor.

But you are trying to measure a poorly filtered DC at that point and a 
clamp on meter ignores the DC component. Or did you break the circuit, 
and connect the leads of that meter to the ends of the break?
 
> Running no load:  4.9 
> Original Pot Setting: A1=41.9 & A2= 42.6
> Full Pot Setting:  A1= 47.3 & A2= 51.5
> At full Pot Setting it trips the breaker on the drive when it stalls.

This could be a clue. if you can measure the DC current going thru the 
field winding, the one labeled 3 amps, and finding a place on the speed 
pot where the current drops to almost nothing, you just found your 
problem. I have my doubts, but as a lng term CET, I've learned that 
anything is possible.

> On 7/27/2021 1:06 PM, Earl Weaver wrote:
> > On 7/27/2021 12:13 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> >> I skimmed the drive manual looking for any info on tuning the
> >> velocity loop, but could ne see anything.
> >> However: Are you sure that your tachometer is set up right? (I
> >> think it probably is or speed would be way off)
> >> And is the current limit pot set to suit your actual motor?
> >
> > The manual that I linked is not an exact match to my drive. I
> > searched but did not find an exact match , but this one is close.
> > Yes, I believe the tach is set up right. I can get the speed control
> > to work good. It's just the power at low RPM is the biggest problem.
> > Your description from an earlier post describes it perfectly.
> > "I would expect a speed-controlled loop spindle to feel springy. As
> > you move the chuck faster than commanded speed the drive will reduce
> > the current to try to slow the spindle (maybe even reversing in to
> > braking)
> > Then as you wobble it back the other way it will take some time to
> > wind up the other way."
> > I will check the current limit pots to see if that is limiting the
> > torque.
> >
> > **Earl Weaver
> > Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Chris Albertson
So the DC motor is seeing roughly 50 amps at stall?What is the motor
rated at?  Is there a maximum current stamped on the data plate?

What is A1 and A2?   Are these the supply and ground return?  If so how
could they not be equal?   Maybe your meter is only good to plus or minus
10%

It would also be good to look at PWM duty cycle vs load on the spindle. So
you can understand what the controller it doing.  It is best to real a real
scope or logic analyzer but if you don't have that the halscope is likely
good enough

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:46 AM Earl Weaver 
wrote:

>
> Ok, Here is my attempt at taking amp readings.
> I attached my AC Clamp Meter to lines A1 and A2 going from drive to motor.
> Running no load:  4.9
> Original Pot Setting: A1=41.9 & A2= 42.6
> Full Pot Setting:  A1= 47.3 & A2= 51.5
> At full Pot Setting it trips the breaker on the drive when it stalls.
>
> On 7/27/2021 1:06 PM, Earl Weaver wrote:
> >
> > On 7/27/2021 12:13 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> >> I skimmed the drive manual looking for any info on tuning the velocity
> >> loop, but could ne see anything.
> >> However: Are you sure that your tachometer is set up right? (I think
> >> it probably is or speed would be way off)
> >> And is the current limit pot set to suit your actual motor?
> >>
> > The manual that I linked is not an exact match to my drive. I searched
> > but did not find an exact match , but this one is close.
> > Yes, I believe the tach is set up right. I can get the speed control
> > to work good. It's just the power at low RPM is the biggest problem.
> > Your description from an earlier post describes it perfectly.
> > "I would expect a speed-controlled loop spindle to feel springy. As you
> > move the chuck faster than commanded speed the drive will reduce the
> > current to try to slow the spindle (maybe even reversing in to
> > braking)
> > Then as you wobble it back the other way it will take some time to
> > wind up the other way."
> > I will check the current limit pots to see if that is limiting the
> > torque.
> >
> > **Earl Weaver
> > Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 27 July 2021 11:48:29 Earl Weaver wrote:

> My 8" chuck has a max 2500 RPM, I would think 1500 RPM would be
> sufficient for my use.
> The motor has 2 line wires and 2 shunt field wires. plus tachometer
> feedback wires.
>
> On 7/27/2021 10:02 AM, andy pugh wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 14:10, Earl Weaver  
wrote:
> >> Would there be a benefit for me to change the motor pulley to a
> >> smaller size?
> >
> > I think that would depend on your planned use.
> >
> > My lathe can do 3000rpm but the macros I use with constant surface
> > speed top out at 1500rpm and I very, very, rarely find that too
> > slow. So, I suspect that, unless you do a lot of very tiny parts,
> > gearing for 1500rpm would suit you better if you regularly make 8"
> > parts.
> >
> > My lathe, at 3000rpm, is unusually fast for an 8" lathe.
> >
> > CNC and carbide has changed the rules a bit, but if you go back to
> > the 70s a 10" lathe would tend to top out at 1500 and a 15" at 800
> > rpm.
> >
> > It seems that your spindle motor is a wound-field motor, I don't
> > know very much about those, but I think that they have rather lower
> > low-speed torque than a permanent magnet motor.
> > (Though this might depend on whether the motor is wired shunt or
> > series) But they are typically used where a wider range of operating
> > speeds than can be used with an induction motor is required.
>
Actually, the torque goes up as the speed goes down, because they run at 
the speed determined by the counter emf generated by varying the current 
in the field winding, and the higher current actually causes it to slow 
down, but at the same time, the torque rises because the field magnets 
get stronger, generating the balancing back emf at a lower armature 
speed. Unfortunately for those motors, the non-grain oriented steel used 
in those motors is saturated magnetically, at around 1/4 of the magnetic 
field we can make with todays magnetic materiel. Not very efficient and 
it shows in the power bill to run it. 

My bet is that since this is a very old tech, the power supply will have 
both selenium rectifiers and wet electrolyte filter capacitors, and one, 
or the other or both have reached their retirement age, like me a long 
time back, and like me, are no longer working very well.

Where are your digs located Earl? I am in north central WV.

> **Earl Weaver
> Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Earl Weaver


Ok, Here is my attempt at taking amp readings.
I attached my AC Clamp Meter to lines A1 and A2 going from drive to motor.
Running no load:  4.9
Original Pot Setting: A1=41.9 & A2= 42.6
Full Pot Setting:  A1= 47.3 & A2= 51.5
At full Pot Setting it trips the breaker on the drive when it stalls.

On 7/27/2021 1:06 PM, Earl Weaver wrote:


On 7/27/2021 12:13 PM, andy pugh wrote:

I skimmed the drive manual looking for any info on tuning the velocity
loop, but could ne see anything.
However: Are you sure that your tachometer is set up right? (I think
it probably is or speed would be way off)
And is the current limit pot set to suit your actual motor?

The manual that I linked is not an exact match to my drive. I searched 
but did not find an exact match , but this one is close.
Yes, I believe the tach is set up right. I can get the speed control 
to work good. It's just the power at low RPM is the biggest problem.

Your description from an earlier post describes it perfectly.
"I would expect a speed-controlled loop spindle to feel springy. As you
move the chuck faster than commanded speed the drive will reduce the
current to try to slow the spindle (maybe even reversing in to
braking)
Then as you wobble it back the other way it will take some time to
wind up the other way."
I will check the current limit pots to see if that is limiting the 
torque.


**Earl Weaver
Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users




___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Earl Weaver



On 7/27/2021 12:13 PM, andy pugh wrote:

I skimmed the drive manual looking for any info on tuning the velocity
loop, but could ne see anything.
However: Are you sure that your tachometer is set up right? (I think
it probably is or speed would be way off)
And is the current limit pot set to suit your actual motor?

The manual that I linked is not an exact match to my drive. I searched 
but did not find an exact match , but this one is close.
Yes, I believe the tach is set up right. I can get the speed control to 
work good. It's just the power at low RPM is the biggest problem.

Your description from an earlier post describes it perfectly.
"I would expect a speed-controlled loop spindle to feel springy. As you
move the chuck faster than commanded speed the drive will reduce the
current to try to slow the spindle (maybe even reversing in to
braking)
Then as you wobble it back the other way it will take some time to
wind up the other way."
I will check the current limit pots to see if that is limiting the torque.

**Earl Weaver
Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread andy pugh
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 14:10, Earl Weaver  wrote:
>
> Here's a link to motor nameplate, drive info etc.
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8k6ss8tfbfl4muj/AACFFFxQLOsuvu04vPmuK21Ta?dl=0

I skimmed the drive manual looking for any info on tuning the velocity
loop, but could ne see anything.
However: Are you sure that your tachometer is set up right? (I think
it probably is or speed would be way off)
And is the current limit pot set to suit your actual motor?

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 27 July 2021 08:16:40 andy pugh wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 12:41, Gene Heskett  
wrote:
> > > The only way to make the spindle feel "stiff" in your test would
> > > be to close the position loop with the encoder, but then how do
> > > you drive it as a spindle with a speed command?
> >
> > With a honking big power supply, and a high resolution encoder.
> > I have 2 machines with 1hp rated motors, both claiming to be 90 volt
>
> You seem to have misunderstood my point.
>
> Is your spindle stiff against "wiggling" when running at low speed
> under no load? My guess would be that it is not.
>
> And I also doubt that you are running it in closed-loop position
> control, as a spindle.

Please define the difference. At creep speeds it sure acts like its under 
position control. And yes, its just as stiff at 20 revs as it is at 
2700. That power is available at any speed when the Pgain is 20 or more. 
The ridiculous encoder resolution sees to that. One of the smarter moves 
I ever made was moving the encoder to an shop made extension stud 
sticking out of the rear of the motor. Quantization noise is inaudible 
now.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Earl Weaver
My 8" chuck has a max 2500 RPM, I would think 1500 RPM would be 
sufficient for my use.
The motor has 2 line wires and 2 shunt field wires. plus tachometer 
feedback wires.


On 7/27/2021 10:02 AM, andy pugh wrote:

On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 14:10, Earl Weaver  wrote:


Would there be a benefit for me to change the motor pulley to a smaller
size?

I think that would depend on your planned use.

My lathe can do 3000rpm but the macros I use with constant surface
speed top out at 1500rpm and I very, very, rarely find that too slow.
So, I suspect that, unless you do a lot of very tiny parts, gearing
for 1500rpm would suit you better if you regularly make 8" parts.

My lathe, at 3000rpm, is unusually fast for an 8" lathe.

CNC and carbide has changed the rules a bit, but if you go back to the
70s a 10" lathe would tend to top out at 1500 and a 15" at 800 rpm.

It seems that your spindle motor is a wound-field motor, I don't know
very much about those, but I think that they have rather lower
low-speed torque than a permanent magnet motor.
(Though this might depend on whether the motor is wired shunt or series)
But they are typically used where a wider range of operating speeds
than can be used with an induction motor is required.



**Earl Weaver
Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread andy pugh
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 14:10, Earl Weaver  wrote:

> Would there be a benefit for me to change the motor pulley to a smaller
> size?

I think that would depend on your planned use.

My lathe can do 3000rpm but the macros I use with constant surface
speed top out at 1500rpm and I very, very, rarely find that too slow.
So, I suspect that, unless you do a lot of very tiny parts, gearing
for 1500rpm would suit you better if you regularly make 8" parts.

My lathe, at 3000rpm, is unusually fast for an 8" lathe.

CNC and carbide has changed the rules a bit, but if you go back to the
70s a 10" lathe would tend to top out at 1500 and a 15" at 800 rpm.

It seems that your spindle motor is a wound-field motor, I don't know
very much about those, but I think that they have rather lower
low-speed torque than a permanent magnet motor.
(Though this might depend on whether the motor is wired shunt or series)
But they are typically used where a wider range of operating speeds
than can be used with an induction motor is required.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Earl Weaver

Here's a link to motor nameplate, drive info etc.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8k6ss8tfbfl4muj/AACFFFxQLOsuvu04vPmuK21Ta?dl=0

Would there be a benefit for me to change the motor pulley to a smaller 
size?


On 7/26/2021 8:04 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:

On Monday 26 July 2021 18:11:45 Earl Weaver wrote:


Hi,
I have a lathe spindle with 8 in. chuck that is run with a 5HP
Reliance DC Motor and Reliance DC Drive.
I just cannot get much power out of it at low RPM. Was trying to turn
8in OD steel, at approx. 200 -250 RPM with .005 in. cut. It didn't
work, it just stalled.
When I run it at low RPM the chuck rotation is movable, not firm.
I can take a hold of the chuck and hold it and move it back and forth
as it rotates.
It also is more noisy at low RPM.


All of the above and below description, would seem to fit where the DC
supply is duff. Do  you have ny docs on it, and test gear like a scope
and dvm?


This lathe is a Linuxcnc retrofit with J Elson's  Universal PWM
Controller and DAC Spindle control.
The DC drive has tachometer feedback from the motor.
I have tried numerous times to adjust, tune the drive, without
success. I also tried closed loop control from the spindle encoder
within LCNC, also no success.

So here come the questions:
Should I keep trying to get this DC Drive working or would it be
better to switch to  AC Variable Frequency Drive?
If I would switch to AC VFD would 5HP AC Motor  be sufficient size for
existing 1:1 ratio double v belt to drive 8" spindle chuck?
What torque at low RPM can I expect for this 5HP DC motor? am I
expecting to much from it?
Would there be a better drive option for the existing DC motor?
Any recommendations?


Can you copy the motors nameplate data to us? And do you have a dvm with
an amps range that includes the amperage listed on the nameplate as FLA?
That stands for "Full Load Amps" but many DC motors can be pushed harder
than that, up to twice that if its starting a heavy load as it will drop
a lot as it reaches the requested speed in a second or so.


Thanks,


Cheers, Gene Heskett


**Earl Weaver
Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread andy pugh
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 12:41, Gene Heskett  wrote:

> > The only way to make the spindle feel "stiff" in your test would be to
> > close the position loop with the encoder, but then how do you drive it
> > as a spindle with a speed command?
>
> With a honking big power supply, and a high resolution encoder.
> I have 2 machines with 1hp rated motors, both claiming to be 90 volt

You seem to have misunderstood my point.

Is your spindle stiff against "wiggling" when running at low speed
under no load? My guess would be that it is not.

And I also doubt that you are running it in closed-loop position
control, as a spindle.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Gene Heskett
On Tuesday 27 July 2021 05:13:28 andy pugh wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at 23:55, Earl Weaver  
wrote:
> > I have a lathe spindle with 8 in. chuck that is run with a 5HP
> > Reliance DC Motor and Reliance DC Drive.
>
> What kind of DC motor is this? Is it a permanent-magnet servo motor?
>
> Typically DC motors perform better at lower speeds than an AC
> induction motor, so I don't think that swapping to a motor/VFD
> combination will help.
>
> If the motor is running closed-loop speed control from the tachometer
> then, as suggested, you should test whether full rated current is
> being applied when the lathe is cutting at the limit.
>
> I would expect a speed-controlled loop spindle to feel springy. As you
> move the chuck faster than commanded speed the drive will reduce the
> current to try to slow the spindle (maybe even reversing in to
> braking)
> Then as you wobble it back the other way it will take some time to
> wind up the other way.
>
> The only way to make the spindle feel "stiff" in your test would be to
> close the position loop with the encoder, but then how do you drive it
> as a spindle with a speed command?

With a honking big power supply, and a high resolution encoder.
I have 2 machines with 1hp rated motors, both claiming to be 90 volt 
motors with an FLA rating of 9.7 amps. Both are powered by oversized 
power supply's outputing around 127 volts at nearly 20 amps.
One has a very hi res encoder with a scale for 1 rev of a  bit over 7000 
in hi gear,and a bit over 14,000 in low gear. That one has a Pgain of 
20+ in its pid. Control isn't just "stiff", the only way I know when I 
am hitting the limit of about 17 amps into the motor while rigid 
tapping, is by listening carefully for the iron in the motor to chirp 
whn it runs into the limit set in a pwm-servo amp that Jon Elson makes. 
Up to that point, the tach does NOT sag because of the load.

However, the OP's motor is severely disadvantaged by the 1/1 drive if it 
is getting the nameplate FLA, but I'd be checking the PSU. Something is 
definitely fubar. The meter readings I asked for but haven't yet seen 
would be a huge aid at pointing the finger in the right direction.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread andy pugh
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 00:13, Sam Sokolik  wrote:
>
> Is there a reduction?  What is the rated rpm?

I have a cunning plan for a simple electronically-controlled 2-speed
drive for this sort of application.

The idea is to use both a one-way clutch/bearing and a vehicle
air-conditioning clutch.
Both are relatively cheap:
https://simplybearings.co.uk/shop/p152523/CSK20PP-20mm-Sprag-Clutch-One-Way-Bearing-with-Internal-&-External-Keyways-20x47x14mm/product_info.html
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/264754327786
The AC clutch includes bearings and a poly-V pulley.

The idea is to have two separate pulley ratios. There are other
possible arrangements, but one way is with the AC clutch mounted to
the motor flange, and then a smaller pulley mounted outboard of that
also on the motor shaft on the over-running clutch.
When the clutch is engaged the drive is 1:1 (or similar) via the
poly-vee with the sprag clutch overrunning. When the AC clutch is
disengaged the smaller pulley on the motor takes up the drive.

A drawback of this simple arrangement with one active clutch is that
it only works in one direction. (with the AC clutch closed in the
revere direction the sprag does not over-run, and with it open nothing
drives at all) There are other possible arrangements of which is
high-ratio and which is low, but I think that they all have the same
problem. A manual lock-out for rigid-tapping might be an option. I
actually have had very little reason to run my own lathe in reverse.

Fitting two AC clutches might be an option, one on the motor and one
on the headstock. Or both back-to-back on the motor shaft with an
extra mounting face for the second coil.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread andy pugh
On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at 23:55, Earl Weaver  wrote:

> I have a lathe spindle with 8 in. chuck that is run with a 5HP Reliance
> DC Motor and Reliance DC Drive.

What kind of DC motor is this? Is it a permanent-magnet servo motor?

Typically DC motors perform better at lower speeds than an AC
induction motor, so I don't think that swapping to a motor/VFD
combination will help.

If the motor is running closed-loop speed control from the tachometer
then, as suggested, you should test whether full rated current is
being applied when the lathe is cutting at the limit.

I would expect a speed-controlled loop spindle to feel springy. As you
move the chuck faster than commanded speed the drive will reduce the
current to try to slow the spindle (maybe even reversing in to
braking)
Then as you wobble it back the other way it will take some time to
wind up the other way.

The only way to make the spindle feel "stiff" in your test would be to
close the position loop with the encoder, but then how do you drive it
as a spindle with a speed command?

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-27 Thread Rob C
a motor is only rated at 5hp at its rated rpm.  5hp at 2500rpm, hence
it provides around 10.5 ft lb of torque

power = 2 X pi X N X T / 60

(sorry I think in metric to have to convert back and forth)

10.5. ft lb at 200 rpm is around 0.4 HP.

an AC motor (or DC motor, not servo / stepper) should not be run at very
low rpms, I believe the guidance is about 30% of its normal rated rpm,
given you need to still cool the windings. (search Google and do some
reading)

so at 2500rpm rated speed, you should not really go below 750rpm (you are
trying to run at 8 to 10%!)

a DC motor also is voltage proportional rated I am guessing that its
rated at 220V DC so at 200 rpm it will be running at about 17.6V.

if you switch to an AC drive with a VFD then your problem on minimum rpm
will be similar (have a search on Google about vfds and minimum rpm).

for full speed control use a servo (as I do) that will give you
full and precision control. again you are limited by the math of Power
= 2 x pi x N X T / 60



On Mon, 26 Jul 2021, 23:55 Earl Weaver,  wrote:

> Hi,
> I have a lathe spindle with 8 in. chuck that is run with a 5HP Reliance
> DC Motor and Reliance DC Drive.
> I just cannot get much power out of it at low RPM. Was trying to turn
> 8in OD steel, at approx. 200 -250 RPM with .005 in. cut. It didn't work,
> it just stalled.
> When I run it at low RPM the chuck rotation is movable, not firm.
> I can take a hold of the chuck and hold it and move it back and forth as
> it rotates.
> It also is more noisy at low RPM.
>
> This lathe is a Linuxcnc retrofit with J Elson's  Universal PWM
> Controller and DAC Spindle control.
> The DC drive has tachometer feedback from the motor.
> I have tried numerous times to adjust, tune the drive, without success.
> I also tried closed loop control from the spindle encoder within LCNC,
> also no success.
>
> So here come the questions:
> Should I keep trying to get this DC Drive working or would it be better
> to switch to  AC Variable Frequency Drive?
> If I would switch to AC VFD would 5HP AC Motor  be sufficient size for
> existing 1:1 ratio double v belt to drive 8" spindle chuck?
> What torque at low RPM can I expect for this 5HP DC motor? am I
> expecting to much from it?
> Would there be a better drive option for the existing DC motor?
> Any recommendations?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Earl Weaver
> Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-26 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 26 July 2021 18:11:45 Earl Weaver wrote:

> Hi,
> I have a lathe spindle with 8 in. chuck that is run with a 5HP
> Reliance DC Motor and Reliance DC Drive.
> I just cannot get much power out of it at low RPM. Was trying to turn
> 8in OD steel, at approx. 200 -250 RPM with .005 in. cut. It didn't
> work, it just stalled.
> When I run it at low RPM the chuck rotation is movable, not firm.
> I can take a hold of the chuck and hold it and move it back and forth
> as it rotates.
> It also is more noisy at low RPM.
>
All of the above and below description, would seem to fit where the DC 
supply is duff. Do  you have ny docs on it, and test gear like a scope 
and dvm?

> This lathe is a Linuxcnc retrofit with J Elson's  Universal PWM
> Controller and DAC Spindle control.
> The DC drive has tachometer feedback from the motor.
> I have tried numerous times to adjust, tune the drive, without
> success. I also tried closed loop control from the spindle encoder
> within LCNC, also no success.
>
> So here come the questions:
> Should I keep trying to get this DC Drive working or would it be
> better to switch to  AC Variable Frequency Drive?
> If I would switch to AC VFD would 5HP AC Motor  be sufficient size for
> existing 1:1 ratio double v belt to drive 8" spindle chuck?
> What torque at low RPM can I expect for this 5HP DC motor? am I
> expecting to much from it?
> Would there be a better drive option for the existing DC motor?
> Any recommendations?
>
Can you copy the motors nameplate data to us? And do you have a dvm with 
an amps range that includes the amperage listed on the nameplate as FLA?
That stands for "Full Load Amps" but many DC motors can be pushed harder 
than that, up to twice that if its starting a heavy load as it will drop 
a lot as it reaches the requested speed in a second or so.

> Thanks,


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-26 Thread Chris Albertson
A closed-loop DC motor should work fine if your power supply is beefy
enough, the encoder has enough resolution to work at low speeds, and the
PID constants are stunned correctly.

A DC motor running open loop likely would slow or stall when a load is
applied.

It would be instructive to measure the DC current through the motor when it
slows and stalls.  This should be the motor's max-rated current, and the
motor should be generating its full rated stall torque.

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:55 PM Earl Weaver 
wrote:

> Hi,
> I have a lathe spindle with 8 in. chuck that is run with a 5HP Reliance
> DC Motor and Reliance DC Drive.
> I just cannot get much power out of it at low RPM. Was trying to turn
> 8in OD steel, at approx. 200 -250 RPM with .005 in. cut. It didn't work,
> it just stalled.
> When I run it at low RPM the chuck rotation is movable, not firm.
> I can take a hold of the chuck and hold it and move it back and forth as
> it rotates.
> It also is more noisy at low RPM.
>
> This lathe is a Linuxcnc retrofit with J Elson's  Universal PWM
> Controller and DAC Spindle control.
> The DC drive has tachometer feedback from the motor.
> I have tried numerous times to adjust, tune the drive, without success.
> I also tried closed loop control from the spindle encoder within LCNC,
> also no success.
>
> So here come the questions:
> Should I keep trying to get this DC Drive working or would it be better
> to switch to  AC Variable Frequency Drive?
> If I would switch to AC VFD would 5HP AC Motor  be sufficient size for
> existing 1:1 ratio double v belt to drive 8" spindle chuck?
> What torque at low RPM can I expect for this 5HP DC motor? am I
> expecting to much from it?
> Would there be a better drive option for the existing DC motor?
> Any recommendations?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Earl Weaver
> Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-26 Thread Earl Weaver

Rated RPM 2500, 1:1 ratio double v belt to drive 8" spindle chuck

On 7/26/2021 6:09 PM, Sam Sokolik wrote:

Is there a reduction?  What is the rated rpm?

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021, 6:03 PM andrew beck  wrote:


  I would suggest a closed loop ac Vfd drive with encoder.  They are
awesome.

I normally. Buy schiender altivar 71 drives cheap second hand.

But most brands have them.

Second option is a open loop vector control Vfd.  They are pretty good.



On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, 10:55 AM Earl Weaver 
wrote:


Hi,
I have a lathe spindle with 8 in. chuck that is run with a 5HP Reliance
DC Motor and Reliance DC Drive.
I just cannot get much power out of it at low RPM. Was trying to turn
8in OD steel, at approx. 200 -250 RPM with .005 in. cut. It didn't work,
it just stalled.
When I run it at low RPM the chuck rotation is movable, not firm.
I can take a hold of the chuck and hold it and move it back and forth as
it rotates.
It also is more noisy at low RPM.

This lathe is a Linuxcnc retrofit with J Elson's  Universal PWM
Controller and DAC Spindle control.
The DC drive has tachometer feedback from the motor.
I have tried numerous times to adjust, tune the drive, without success.
I also tried closed loop control from the spindle encoder within LCNC,
also no success.

So here come the questions:
Should I keep trying to get this DC Drive working or would it be better
to switch to  AC Variable Frequency Drive?
If I would switch to AC VFD would 5HP AC Motor  be sufficient size for
existing 1:1 ratio double v belt to drive 8" spindle chuck?
What torque at low RPM can I expect for this 5HP DC motor? am I
expecting to much from it?
Would there be a better drive option for the existing DC motor?
Any recommendations?

Thanks,
--
Earl Weaver
Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users




___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-26 Thread Sam Sokolik
Is there a reduction?  What is the rated rpm?

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021, 6:03 PM andrew beck  wrote:

>  I would suggest a closed loop ac Vfd drive with encoder.  They are
> awesome.
>
> I normally. Buy schiender altivar 71 drives cheap second hand.
>
> But most brands have them.
>
> Second option is a open loop vector control Vfd.  They are pretty good.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, 10:55 AM Earl Weaver 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I have a lathe spindle with 8 in. chuck that is run with a 5HP Reliance
> > DC Motor and Reliance DC Drive.
> > I just cannot get much power out of it at low RPM. Was trying to turn
> > 8in OD steel, at approx. 200 -250 RPM with .005 in. cut. It didn't work,
> > it just stalled.
> > When I run it at low RPM the chuck rotation is movable, not firm.
> > I can take a hold of the chuck and hold it and move it back and forth as
> > it rotates.
> > It also is more noisy at low RPM.
> >
> > This lathe is a Linuxcnc retrofit with J Elson's  Universal PWM
> > Controller and DAC Spindle control.
> > The DC drive has tachometer feedback from the motor.
> > I have tried numerous times to adjust, tune the drive, without success.
> > I also tried closed loop control from the spindle encoder within LCNC,
> > also no success.
> >
> > So here come the questions:
> > Should I keep trying to get this DC Drive working or would it be better
> > to switch to  AC Variable Frequency Drive?
> > If I would switch to AC VFD would 5HP AC Motor  be sufficient size for
> > existing 1:1 ratio double v belt to drive 8" spindle chuck?
> > What torque at low RPM can I expect for this 5HP DC motor? am I
> > expecting to much from it?
> > Would there be a better drive option for the existing DC motor?
> > Any recommendations?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> > Earl Weaver
> > Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-26 Thread andrew beck
 I would suggest a closed loop ac Vfd drive with encoder.  They are awesome.

I normally. Buy schiender altivar 71 drives cheap second hand.

But most brands have them.

Second option is a open loop vector control Vfd.  They are pretty good.



On Tue, Jul 27, 2021, 10:55 AM Earl Weaver  wrote:

> Hi,
> I have a lathe spindle with 8 in. chuck that is run with a 5HP Reliance
> DC Motor and Reliance DC Drive.
> I just cannot get much power out of it at low RPM. Was trying to turn
> 8in OD steel, at approx. 200 -250 RPM with .005 in. cut. It didn't work,
> it just stalled.
> When I run it at low RPM the chuck rotation is movable, not firm.
> I can take a hold of the chuck and hold it and move it back and forth as
> it rotates.
> It also is more noisy at low RPM.
>
> This lathe is a Linuxcnc retrofit with J Elson's  Universal PWM
> Controller and DAC Spindle control.
> The DC drive has tachometer feedback from the motor.
> I have tried numerous times to adjust, tune the drive, without success.
> I also tried closed loop control from the spindle encoder within LCNC,
> also no success.
>
> So here come the questions:
> Should I keep trying to get this DC Drive working or would it be better
> to switch to  AC Variable Frequency Drive?
> If I would switch to AC VFD would 5HP AC Motor  be sufficient size for
> existing 1:1 ratio double v belt to drive 8" spindle chuck?
> What torque at low RPM can I expect for this 5HP DC motor? am I
> expecting to much from it?
> Would there be a better drive option for the existing DC motor?
> Any recommendations?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Earl Weaver
> Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Drive Questions

2021-07-26 Thread Earl Weaver

Hi,
I have a lathe spindle with 8 in. chuck that is run with a 5HP Reliance 
DC Motor and Reliance DC Drive.
I just cannot get much power out of it at low RPM. Was trying to turn 
8in OD steel, at approx. 200 -250 RPM with .005 in. cut. It didn't work, 
it just stalled.

When I run it at low RPM the chuck rotation is movable, not firm.
I can take a hold of the chuck and hold it and move it back and forth as 
it rotates.

It also is more noisy at low RPM.

This lathe is a Linuxcnc retrofit with J Elson's  Universal PWM 
Controller and DAC Spindle control.

The DC drive has tachometer feedback from the motor.
I have tried numerous times to adjust, tune the drive, without success.
I also tried closed loop control from the spindle encoder within LCNC, 
also no success.


So here come the questions:
Should I keep trying to get this DC Drive working or would it be better 
to switch to  AC Variable Frequency Drive?
If I would switch to AC VFD would 5HP AC Motor  be sufficient size for 
existing 1:1 ratio double v belt to drive 8" spindle chuck?
What torque at low RPM can I expect for this 5HP DC motor? am I 
expecting to much from it?

Would there be a better drive option for the existing DC motor?
Any recommendations?

Thanks,
--
Earl Weaver
Email: weaverst...@frontier.com 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe 'topslide' component

2021-07-12 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
>
> OK, I'll tidy it up and add some docs. It will probably take me a couple
> of days to get time to do this.
>

Thank you Les, and please take your time :)

El lun, 12 jul 2021 a las 17:17, Les Newell ()
escribió:

> OK, I'll tidy it up and add some docs. It will probably take me a couple
> of days to get time to do this.
>
> Les
>
> On 12/07/2021 18:43, John Dammeyer wrote:
> > I'm very interested.  Eventually the BeagleBone with MachineKIt was to
> be on the Gingery Lathe.  Project #42.  But I like that idea of compound
> slide simulation without having a compound or not having to turn it just to
> do a chamfer cut.
> >
> > John
>
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe 'topslide' component

2021-07-12 Thread Les Newell
OK, I'll tidy it up and add some docs. It will probably take me a couple 
of days to get time to do this.


Les

On 12/07/2021 18:43, John Dammeyer wrote:

I'm very interested.  Eventually the BeagleBone with MachineKIt was to be on 
the Gingery Lathe.  Project #42.  But I like that idea of compound slide 
simulation without having a compound or not having to turn it just to do a 
chamfer cut.

John




___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe 'topslide' component

2021-07-12 Thread Leonardo Marsaglia
Interested! Sometimes I need to chamfer manually on the Mazak and It's a
lot more convenient than using a file.

El lun, 12 jul 2021 a las 14:46, John Dammeyer ()
escribió:

> I'm very interested.  Eventually the BeagleBone with MachineKIt was to be
> on the Gingery Lathe.  Project #42.  But I like that idea of compound slide
> simulation without having a compound or not having to turn it just to do a
> chamfer cut.
>
> John
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Les Newell [mailto:les.new...@fastmail.co.uk]
> > Sent: July-12-21 10:05 AM
> > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [Emc-users] Lathe 'topslide' component
> >
> > A while back I wrote a component for a simulated top slide for lathes
> > with dual MPGs. It allows you to enter an angle and remap the X axis MPG
> > to move both axes simultaneously at that angle. I use it quite a bit for
> > chamfering. At the press of a button I can swap from normal X-Z to X
> > moving the cutter at 45 degrees (or whatever angle).
> >
> > Is this of any interest to any one else?
> >
> > Les
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe 'topslide' component

2021-07-12 Thread Rob C
I'm interested, thanks Les

Rob / Robertspark

On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, 18:08 Les Newell,  wrote:

> A while back I wrote a component for a simulated top slide for lathes
> with dual MPGs. It allows you to enter an angle and remap the X axis MPG
> to move both axes simultaneously at that angle. I use it quite a bit for
> chamfering. At the press of a button I can swap from normal X-Z to X
> moving the cutter at 45 degrees (or whatever angle).
>
> Is this of any interest to any one else?
>
> Les
>
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe 'topslide' component

2021-07-12 Thread John Dammeyer
I'm very interested.  Eventually the BeagleBone with MachineKIt was to be on 
the Gingery Lathe.  Project #42.  But I like that idea of compound slide 
simulation without having a compound or not having to turn it just to do a 
chamfer cut.

John


> -Original Message-
> From: Les Newell [mailto:les.new...@fastmail.co.uk]
> Sent: July-12-21 10:05 AM
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Emc-users] Lathe 'topslide' component
> 
> A while back I wrote a component for a simulated top slide for lathes
> with dual MPGs. It allows you to enter an angle and remap the X axis MPG
> to move both axes simultaneously at that angle. I use it quite a bit for
> chamfering. At the press of a button I can swap from normal X-Z to X
> moving the cutter at 45 degrees (or whatever angle).
> 
> Is this of any interest to any one else?
> 
> Les
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] Lathe 'topslide' component

2021-07-12 Thread Les Newell
A while back I wrote a component for a simulated top slide for lathes 
with dual MPGs. It allows you to enter an angle and remap the X axis MPG 
to move both axes simultaneously at that angle. I use it quite a bit for 
chamfering. At the press of a button I can swap from normal X-Z to X 
moving the cutter at 45 degrees (or whatever angle).


Is this of any interest to any one else?

Les



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe spindle vfd settings

2021-03-05 Thread Feral Engineer
Thanks again, sir :)

Phil T.
The Feral Engineer

Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 10:38 PM Gene Heskett  wrote:

> On Friday 05 March 2021 21:17:12 Feral Engineer wrote:
>
> > Thanks Gene
> >
> > My emco is running a pi 4 as well. Model b, 4gb. What kind of latency
> > figures are you getting on your servo thread? I find mine to be a bit
> > finicky unless I keep wifi off
>
> About 12 u-s.  Worst I ever recorded was 200 u-s after pokig around the
> planet with firefox for about an hour. But that is not as important as
> you might think as both x and z are now 3 phase stepper servo's so they
> haven't much to worry about even with bad latency because of the rubber
> between the stepper drivers, which are in the mesa 7i90HD interface
> card.  So the servos are the coupling between the stepper driver and the
> stepper itself. The advantage is that it only uses enough amps from the
> supply to keep it running smoothly. So the steppers run zombie cool, and
> with near total silence.  Watching it run a program is a bit like
> watching Casper The Ghost, its so quiet.
>
> I acquired this lathe with a broken compound, it fell over long before I
> got it and landed on the compound crank, bending the spindle a few thou
> from the sudden stop with a bison 3 jaw chuck mounted, which I've since
> reground and it all runs true now. So now a QCTP is sitting on a couple
> pounds of cast iron. I cut from the sprue of a white truck wheel, we
> make them here in Weston, holding the TP a its normal height. It is so
> solid there's very little tool chatter either. I don't miss the compound
> since Linuxcnc IS a better compound than it ever had, doing far more
> accurate angles.
>
> > Phil T.
> > The Feral Engineer
> >
> > Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
> > www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer
> >
> I've seen 3 or 4 of them. Decent stuff,
>
> > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 7:56 PM Gene Heskett  wrote:
> > > On Friday 05 March 2021 18:35:19 andy pugh wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 23:31, Feral Engineer
> > >
> > >  wrote:
> > > > > Can someone send me a copypasta of their spindle hal stuff? Pid,
> > > > > ff0,1,2 encoder feedback, all that?
> > > >
> > > > I don't actually run PID on my lathe spindle. I have some
> > > > moderately complex gear selection stuff going on, but otherwise I
> > > > just trust the VFD to do the job.
> > >
> > > I don't have a pid loaded in either of my machines that are running
> > > a vfd. The vfd is stiff enough it doesn't need fawncy controls.
> > >
> > > The only reason I have an encoder on the sheldon lathe is for G33.1
> > > and G76 support. Both of those slave the z travel to the spindle,
> > > what ever its running at doesn't change more than 2% under cutting
> > > load for G76, and maybe 5% for a big tap doing rigid taping. G76
> > > also slaves the x to the programmed G76 cutting depth. On the
> > > sheldon, a pwmgen feeds a spinx1 which controls the vfd. Not even an
> > > d/a except the spinx1 because I run the pwmgen at a rate thats above
> > > the bandwidth of the spinx1.
> > >
> > > You get far better results by properly tuning the vfd.  OOTB they
> > > suck huge dead toads thru soda straws. With a pwmgen getting the
> > > speed signals from motions spindle output, that pwm fed to the
> > > spinx1 along with the dir signal, and a bit of hal sequencing, my
> > > Sheldon, turning at 100 revs in high backgear, and low belt
> > > position/speed, I can do a rigid tap move, and measuring the
> > > overshoot at the bottom of the G33.1 move, is .25 turns.  That's
> > > with a nearly 40 lb 8" 4 jaw chuck mounted.  Who needs a pid?
> > >
> > > That .hal file is attached. Cherry pick with my blessing.  Sure its
> > > a rpi4 file, but its running a Sheldon lathe that after stripping
> > > the stuff linuxcnc doesn't need, and putting in decent ball screws,
> > > still weighs around 1350 lbs.
> > >
> > > Stay safe and well, John.
> > >
> > > Cheers, Gene Heskett
> > > --
> > > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> > >  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> > > -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> > > If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law
> > > respectable. - Louis D. Brandeis
> > > Genes Web page 
> > > ___
> > > Emc-users mailing list
> > > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
> --
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law 

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe spindle vfd settings

2021-03-05 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 05 March 2021 21:17:12 Feral Engineer wrote:

> Thanks Gene
>
> My emco is running a pi 4 as well. Model b, 4gb. What kind of latency
> figures are you getting on your servo thread? I find mine to be a bit
> finicky unless I keep wifi off

About 12 u-s.  Worst I ever recorded was 200 u-s after pokig around the 
planet with firefox for about an hour. But that is not as important as 
you might think as both x and z are now 3 phase stepper servo's so they 
haven't much to worry about even with bad latency because of the rubber 
between the stepper drivers, which are in the mesa 7i90HD interface 
card.  So the servos are the coupling between the stepper driver and the 
stepper itself. The advantage is that it only uses enough amps from the 
supply to keep it running smoothly. So the steppers run zombie cool, and 
with near total silence.  Watching it run a program is a bit like 
watching Casper The Ghost, its so quiet.

I acquired this lathe with a broken compound, it fell over long before I 
got it and landed on the compound crank, bending the spindle a few thou 
from the sudden stop with a bison 3 jaw chuck mounted, which I've since 
reground and it all runs true now. So now a QCTP is sitting on a couple 
pounds of cast iron. I cut from the sprue of a white truck wheel, we 
make them here in Weston, holding the TP a its normal height. It is so 
solid there's very little tool chatter either. I don't miss the compound 
since Linuxcnc IS a better compound than it ever had, doing far more 
accurate angles.

> Phil T.
> The Feral Engineer
>
> Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
> www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer
>
I've seen 3 or 4 of them. Decent stuff,

> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 7:56 PM Gene Heskett  wrote:
> > On Friday 05 March 2021 18:35:19 andy pugh wrote:
> > > On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 23:31, Feral Engineer
> >
> >  wrote:
> > > > Can someone send me a copypasta of their spindle hal stuff? Pid,
> > > > ff0,1,2 encoder feedback, all that?
> > >
> > > I don't actually run PID on my lathe spindle. I have some
> > > moderately complex gear selection stuff going on, but otherwise I
> > > just trust the VFD to do the job.
> >
> > I don't have a pid loaded in either of my machines that are running
> > a vfd. The vfd is stiff enough it doesn't need fawncy controls.
> >
> > The only reason I have an encoder on the sheldon lathe is for G33.1
> > and G76 support. Both of those slave the z travel to the spindle,
> > what ever its running at doesn't change more than 2% under cutting
> > load for G76, and maybe 5% for a big tap doing rigid taping. G76
> > also slaves the x to the programmed G76 cutting depth. On the
> > sheldon, a pwmgen feeds a spinx1 which controls the vfd. Not even an
> > d/a except the spinx1 because I run the pwmgen at a rate thats above
> > the bandwidth of the spinx1.
> >
> > You get far better results by properly tuning the vfd.  OOTB they
> > suck huge dead toads thru soda straws. With a pwmgen getting the
> > speed signals from motions spindle output, that pwm fed to the
> > spinx1 along with the dir signal, and a bit of hal sequencing, my
> > Sheldon, turning at 100 revs in high backgear, and low belt
> > position/speed, I can do a rigid tap move, and measuring the
> > overshoot at the bottom of the G33.1 move, is .25 turns.  That's
> > with a nearly 40 lb 8" 4 jaw chuck mounted.  Who needs a pid?
> >
> > That .hal file is attached. Cherry pick with my blessing.  Sure its
> > a rpi4 file, but its running a Sheldon lathe that after stripping
> > the stuff linuxcnc doesn't need, and putting in decent ball screws,
> > still weighs around 1350 lbs.
> >
> > Stay safe and well, John.
> >
> > Cheers, Gene Heskett
> > --
> > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> >  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> > -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> > If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law
> > respectable. - Louis D. Brandeis
> > Genes Web page 
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe spindle vfd settings

2021-03-05 Thread Feral Engineer
Thanks Gene

My emco is running a pi 4 as well. Model b, 4gb. What kind of latency
figures are you getting on your servo thread? I find mine to be a bit
finicky unless I keep wifi off

Phil T.
The Feral Engineer

Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 7:56 PM Gene Heskett  wrote:

> On Friday 05 March 2021 18:35:19 andy pugh wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 23:31, Feral Engineer
>  wrote:
> > > Can someone send me a copypasta of their spindle hal stuff? Pid,
> > > ff0,1,2 encoder feedback, all that?
> >
> > I don't actually run PID on my lathe spindle. I have some moderately
> > complex gear selection stuff going on, but otherwise I just trust the
> > VFD to do the job.
> I don't have a pid loaded in either of my machines that are running a
> vfd. The vfd is stiff enough it doesn't need fawncy controls.
>
> The only reason I have an encoder on the sheldon lathe is for G33.1 and
> G76 support. Both of those slave the z travel to the spindle, what ever
> its running at doesn't change more than 2% under cutting load for G76,
> and maybe 5% for a big tap doing rigid taping. G76 also slaves the x to
> the programmed G76 cutting depth. On the sheldon, a pwmgen feeds a
> spinx1 which controls the vfd. Not even an d/a except the spinx1 because
> I run the pwmgen at a rate thats above the bandwidth of the spinx1.
>
> You get far better results by properly tuning the vfd.  OOTB they suck
> huge dead toads thru soda straws. With a pwmgen getting the speed
> signals from motions spindle output, that pwm fed to the spinx1 along
> with the dir signal, and a bit of hal sequencing, my Sheldon, turning at
> 100 revs in high backgear, and low belt position/speed, I can do a rigid
> tap move, and measuring the overshoot at the bottom of the G33.1 move,
> is .25 turns.  That's with a nearly 40 lb 8" 4 jaw chuck mounted.  Who
> needs a pid?
>
> That .hal file is attached. Cherry pick with my blessing.  Sure its a
> rpi4 file, but its running a Sheldon lathe that after stripping the
> stuff linuxcnc doesn't need, and putting in decent ball screws,
> still weighs around 1350 lbs.
>
> Stay safe and well, John.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
> --
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>  soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
> If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
>  - Louis D. Brandeis
> Genes Web page 
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe spindle vfd settings

2021-03-05 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 05 March 2021 18:35:19 andy pugh wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 23:31, Feral Engineer 
 wrote:
> > Can someone send me a copypasta of their spindle hal stuff? Pid,
> > ff0,1,2 encoder feedback, all that?
>
> I don't actually run PID on my lathe spindle. I have some moderately
> complex gear selection stuff going on, but otherwise I just trust the
> VFD to do the job.
I don't have a pid loaded in either of my machines that are running a 
vfd. The vfd is stiff enough it doesn't need fawncy controls.

The only reason I have an encoder on the sheldon lathe is for G33.1 and 
G76 support. Both of those slave the z travel to the spindle, what ever 
its running at doesn't change more than 2% under cutting load for G76, 
and maybe 5% for a big tap doing rigid taping. G76 also slaves the x to 
the programmed G76 cutting depth. On the sheldon, a pwmgen feeds a 
spinx1 which controls the vfd. Not even an d/a except the spinx1 because 
I run the pwmgen at a rate thats above the bandwidth of the spinx1.

You get far better results by properly tuning the vfd.  OOTB they suck 
huge dead toads thru soda straws. With a pwmgen getting the speed 
signals from motions spindle output, that pwm fed to the spinx1 along 
with the dir signal, and a bit of hal sequencing, my Sheldon, turning at 
100 revs in high backgear, and low belt position/speed, I can do a rigid 
tap move, and measuring the overshoot at the bottom of the G33.1 move, 
is .25 turns.  That's with a nearly 40 lb 8" 4 jaw chuck mounted.  Who 
needs a pid?

That .hal file is attached. Cherry pick with my blessing.  Sure its a 
rpi4 file, but its running a Sheldon lathe that after stripping the 
stuff linuxcnc doesn't need, and putting in decent ball screws,
still weighs around 1350 lbs.

Stay safe and well, John.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
 - Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page 
###
# WORKING DOWN FROM THE TOP, THE LAST GPIO IN USE AS OF THIS DATE IS 063 FOR 
VFD-RESET!
# hm2-7i90-stepper.hal version 1.005 a/o above date
# because the 7i90 is damaged, everything is enabled.
# HAL file for HostMot2 with 4 steppers, 4 encoders, 2 pwmgen
# Apparently a blown gpio.00 so x ,is dead, bring up another stepgen
# and use it. 2 was dead also, so 3 is now x Damn the static electricity
# Derived from Ted Hyde's original hm2-servo config
#
# Based up work and discussion with Seb & Peter & Jeff
# GNU license references - insert here. www.linuxcnc.org
# 
# See also:
# 

# and http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?HostMot2
#

# Core EMC/HAL Loads

# kinematics
loadrt [KINS]KINEMATICS

# motion controller, get name and thread periods from ini file
loadrt [EMCMOT]EMCMOT servo_period_nsec=[EMCMOT]SERVO_PERIOD 
num_joints=[KINS]JOINTS

##
# extra, slower thread for jogwheel stuffs at 200Hz
loadrt  threads name1=jog-thread period1=2000 fp1=1
##
# hostmot2 driver
loadrt hostmot2

# load low-level driver
loadrt  [HOSTMOT2](DRIVER) config=[HOSTMOT2](CONFIG) spi_debug=3 
spiclk_rate=41666 spiclk_rate_rd=25000

# load estop latch component
loadrt  estop_latch count=1

loadusr -W /home/pi/linuxcnc/configs/sheldon-lathe/units.py

# loadrt stuff for g33.1 ovrtrvl
loadrt  sample_hold names=sample-dirchg,sample-spndlchg

# Now my stuff for a steady tach reading
loadrt  lowpass names=spindle-tach-filter,spindle-steady
loadrt  abs 
names=spindle-abs,spindle-tach-unidir,abs.0,abs.1,gear_abs,abs_encdir
loadrt  minmax names=spindle-track,X-axis-track,Z-axis-track
loadrt  scale   names=scale-tach,scale-ovrtrvl
loadrt  nearnames=close-enough
loadrt  tristate_bit names=watchdog-reset
loadrt  updown names=updownxcounter,updownzcounter
loadrt  conv_s32_u32count=2
loadrt  conv_s32_float  names=s32floatx,s32floatz,s32_float_cmd,s32_float_spndl
loadrt  conv_float_s32  names=floats32x,floats32z
loadrt  bitslice names=mux8addrx,mux8addrz personality=3,3
loadrt  mux8 names=mux8jogspeedx,mux8jogspeedz
loadrt  wcomp   names=jogsteerx,jogsteerz
# here I need the module name as its leading portion
loadrt  and2
names=and2xgainup,and2xgaindown,and2xgate,and2zgainup,and2zgaindown,and2zgate,and2xtoggle,and2ztoggle,Flt-and2-estop
loadrt  mult2   
names=mult2x1,mult2x2,mult2z1,mult2z2,mult2gear,mult2pwm,mult2turns,mult2distance
loadrt  not names=notjogx,notjogz,FaultXnot,FaultZnot,FHomeNot
# need a jog-disable when adjusting stepsize
loadrt  mux2names=jogmux2x,jogmux2z,ovrtvl-frz,ovrtrvl-scaler-mux
loadrt  oneshot 

Re: [Emc-users] Lathe spindle vfd settings

2021-03-05 Thread Feral Engineer
Lenze 8200 vector from an emco pc turn 55

Phil T.
The Feral Engineer

Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 7:34 PM andy pugh  wrote:

> On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 00:07, Feral Engineer 
> wrote:
> > I've got 2 speed pulleys on mine 2000 and 4000rpm. Just want to try and
> > fine tune the rpm and see if there's a way to soften the acc/dec without
> > messing with the vfd (don't have the removable programming panel).
>
> Which VFD  is it? In some cases the LinuxCNC ModBus drivers let you do
> all that the OP panel would allow. Though sadly in some cases you
> can't enable Modbus without the OP.
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."
> — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe spindle vfd settings

2021-03-05 Thread andy pugh
On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 at 00:07, Feral Engineer  wrote:
> I've got 2 speed pulleys on mine 2000 and 4000rpm. Just want to try and
> fine tune the rpm and see if there's a way to soften the acc/dec without
> messing with the vfd (don't have the removable programming panel).

Which VFD  is it? In some cases the LinuxCNC ModBus drivers let you do
all that the OP panel would allow. Though sadly in some cases you
can't enable Modbus without the OP.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe spindle vfd settings

2021-03-05 Thread Feral Engineer
I've got 2 speed pulleys on mine 2000 and 4000rpm. Just want to try and
fine tune the rpm and see if there's a way to soften the acc/dec without
messing with the vfd (don't have the removable programming panel). Plus, i
like to tinker with stuff to learn more about it.

Phil T.
The Feral Engineer

Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer

On Fri, Mar 5, 2021, 6:38 PM andy pugh  wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 23:31, Feral Engineer 
> wrote:
> >
> > Can someone send me a copypasta of their spindle hal stuff? Pid, ff0,1,2
> > encoder feedback, all that?
>
> I don't actually run PID on my lathe spindle. I have some moderately
> complex gear selection stuff going on, but otherwise I just trust the
> VFD to do the job.
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."
> — George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe spindle vfd settings

2021-03-05 Thread andy pugh
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 23:31, Feral Engineer  wrote:
>
> Can someone send me a copypasta of their spindle hal stuff? Pid, ff0,1,2
> encoder feedback, all that?

I don't actually run PID on my lathe spindle. I have some moderately
complex gear selection stuff going on, but otherwise I just trust the
VFD to do the job.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] Lathe spindle vfd settings

2021-03-05 Thread Feral Engineer
Can someone send me a copypasta of their spindle hal stuff? Pid, ff0,1,2
encoder feedback, all that? Gonna tackle the one on my machine but I've
never done it before, so a starting point would be helpful.

TIA

Phil T.
The Feral Engineer

Check out my LinuxCNC tutorials, machine builds and other antics at
www.youtube.com/c/theferalengineer

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread dave engvall
If you have nothing else to do download the demo for SynergyCAD. 
Parasoiid based. 2-D, 2.5D, wireframe, solids. lathe, edm.

For the lathe you draw in X,Y and it transforms it to Z, X when you CAM.
I started from scratch and it took me a long time to get comfortable 
with it. Exports are dxf, dwg which tend to be problematical and iges.
... runs on Windoze with  some limitations but those limitations go away 
with Linux.

Their forte was extrusion screws back when the only program was DOS based.
 YMMV.

Dave

On 2/3/21 2:37 PM, R C wrote:
actually, I think that is what I saw that guy in that video I posted 
doing. In freecad, he took a plane and intersected it with his work 
piece, and then created a path (he called it a wire.).  I posted that 
video here  a few iterations back in this thread.



That seemed kind of neat, how he did that,  but I was not able to 
reproduce that.




On 2/3/21 3:29 PM, andy pugh wrote:

On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 21:55, R C  wrote:

I know how to code, from micro controller to clusters,  but this 
"g-code

thing" is a different animal.  And I imagine,  that it would take a lot
of drawing and coding on paper, you know,  like the 1970's Univaxes...

Not really, you just need to draw the outline. For most lathe-turned
parts that is just a set of diameters and shoulders.




___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users




___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread R C
actually,  I think that is what I saw that guy in that video I posted 
doing. In freecad, he took a plane and intersected it with his work 
piece, and then created a path (he called it a wire.).  I posted that 
video here  a few iterations back in this thread.



That seemed kind of neat, how he did that,  but I was not able to 
reproduce that.




On 2/3/21 3:29 PM, andy pugh wrote:

On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 21:55, R C  wrote:


I know how to code, from micro controller to clusters,  but this "g-code
thing" is a different animal.  And I imagine,  that it would take a lot
of drawing and coding on paper, you know,  like the 1970's Univaxes...

Not really, you just need to draw the outline. For most lathe-turned
parts that is just a set of diameters and shoulders.




___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread andy pugh
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 21:55, R C  wrote:

> I know how to code, from micro controller to clusters,  but this "g-code
> thing" is a different animal.  And I imagine,  that it would take a lot
> of drawing and coding on paper, you know,  like the 1970's Univaxes...

Not really, you just need to draw the outline. For most lathe-turned
parts that is just a set of diameters and shoulders.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread Matthew Herd
In my experience you don't need to run the installer after renewing a
Fusion360 license for personal use.  You just have to do some clicking on
their website.  If the installer downloads automatically as a part of the
license renewal you can ignore it.

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 4:50 PM R C  wrote:

> I set up a new machine with a clean windows 10 install (on a disk tray),
> after the install it was not happy with the  AMD ATI video card
> (irritating), apparently there is an ATI driver that messes up and is
> not needed.
>
>
> When the application starts,  one needs to be connected to the internet,
> and log in with an account and password previously created.  (also
> annoying  and a security risk I think).
>
>
>
> does the installer, a new download, install over the old one?  do you
> need to uninstall the old one?   or start from scratch with a fresh
> windows 10 even?
>
>
>
>
> On 2/3/21 1:59 PM, Dave Matthews wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 3:13 PM R C  wrote:
> >
> >> well,
> >>
> >>
> >> I don't expect companies to give me stuff for free of course, they
> >> produce software for a market, to make money, I am just not in that
> >> market. I read that a license, per year, if not mistaken, is $495, and
> >> you can use it for free for a year (1st year ?). That is of course a
> >> good deal, for a machine shop.
> >>
> >>
> >> The one year license is renewable.  To renew you just download the
> > installer again.  I don't think I even let the download complete last
> time
> > I did it.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > ___
> > Emc-users mailing list
> > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 
Matthew Herd
Email:  herd.m...@gmail.com
Cell:  610-608-8930

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread R C


On 2/3/21 2:14 PM, andy pugh wrote:

On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 18:18, R C  wrote:


I have been busy for a while with that pay check thing, and didn't have
much time to look into  creating g-code, that I can use  in linux cnc
for a lathe.

It's worth pointing out that now that LinuxCNC has G71 and G72 you
might not need CAM.


right,  I looked at that, a while back.



If you can hand-code the desired profile then the repeated cuts etc
are all done by the cycle.


I know how to code, from micro controller to clusters,  but this "g-code 
thing" is a different animal.  And I imagine,  that it would take a lot 
of drawing and coding on paper, you know,  like the 1970's Univaxes...


It seems more convenient, esier, less error prone, less crashing tools 
in the chuck, work etc,  to do it with a CAD program, and have it 
generate  g-code.




Be aware that the built-in version in Master uses a different set of
control words to the Python remap version that can run on earlier
versions.


Uhm,   I don't ven understand what it is you just said 



I am still searching for something that  works for me the easiest, but  
as I said, it is a beginning hobby for me, so I am not pressured for time.





___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread R C
I set up a new machine with a clean windows 10 install (on a disk tray), 
after the install it was not happy with the  AMD ATI video card 
(irritating), apparently there is an ATI driver that messes up and is 
not needed.



When the application starts,  one needs to be connected to the internet, 
and log in with an account and password previously created.  (also  
annoying  and a security risk I think).




does the installer, a new download, install over the old one?  do you 
need to uninstall the old one?   or start from scratch with a fresh 
windows 10 even?





On 2/3/21 1:59 PM, Dave Matthews wrote:

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 3:13 PM R C  wrote:


well,


I don't expect companies to give me stuff for free of course, they
produce software for a market, to make money, I am just not in that
market. I read that a license, per year, if not mistaken, is $495, and
you can use it for free for a year (1st year ?). That is of course a
good deal, for a machine shop.


The one year license is renewable.  To renew you just download the

installer again.  I don't think I even let the download complete last time
I did it.

Dave

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread andy pugh
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 18:18, R C  wrote:

> I have been busy for a while with that pay check thing, and didn't have
> much time to look into  creating g-code, that I can use  in linux cnc
> for a lathe.

It's worth pointing out that now that LinuxCNC has G71 and G72 you
might not need CAM.

If you can hand-code the desired profile then the repeated cuts etc
are all done by the cycle.

Be aware that the built-in version in Master uses a different set of
control words to the Python remap version that can run on earlier
versions.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread andy pugh
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 16:48, Bruce Layne  wrote:
>
> once you have tens or
> hundreds of designs in their proprietary CAD format, they decide to
> unilaterally change the deal and you're trapped.

Not just Autodesk, though. Alibre did that to me.

-- 
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread Dave Matthews
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 3:13 PM R C  wrote:

> well,
>
>
> I don't expect companies to give me stuff for free of course, they
> produce software for a market, to make money, I am just not in that
> market. I read that a license, per year, if not mistaken, is $495, and
> you can use it for free for a year (1st year ?). That is of course a
> good deal, for a machine shop.
>
>
> The one year license is renewable.  To renew you just download the
installer again.  I don't think I even let the download complete last time
I did it.

Dave

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread R C

well,


I don't expect companies to give me stuff for free of course, they 
produce software for a market, to make money, I am just not in that 
market. I read that a license, per year, if not mistaken, is $495, and 
you can use it for free for a year (1st year ?). That is of course a 
good deal, for a machine shop.


I am not in that market, hobbyist here, and a beginning one, so yeah  
$495 a year, at this point not something I'd consider. In my case it 
would probably come down to $200 $300 for the 2 parts I might make with 
it, a year.



I am using Freecad, and for the mill it does what I want it to do, and 
probably much more. It seems though that for some reason it is easier to 
find software that can do things on a mill, but not on a lathe.




On 2/3/21 9:45 AM, Bruce Layne wrote:

This is my annual warning that AutoDesk isn't The Benevolent Software
Company, and they aren't in business to give you free stuff because
you're so awesome.  AutoDesk has a history of offering free or low cost
software to entice users into investing their time to learn the software
(this may be the highest cost of ownership), and once you have tens or
hundreds of designs in their proprietary CAD format, they decide to
unilaterally change the deal and you're trapped.  They did this to me
with AutoSketch, a couple of decades ago.  I had hundreds of hours
wasted and many designs were abandoned because I couldn't export them.
AutoSketch was never a serious product.  It was used to migrate users to
AutoCAD LT, and then to AutoCAD.

FreeCAD doesn't do everything you might want, but I've been very happy
with it and I'm grateful to the open source programmers who make it
possible.  If all you want is 2D or 2.5D CAM for LinuxCNC, it may be all
you need in its current state.  FreeCAD is still under development, so
it may have the features you need by the time you need them, but that's
a risky proposition with free open source software.

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread Chris Albertson
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:48 AM Bruce Layne 
wrote:

>  and once you have tens or
> hundreds of designs in their proprietary CAD format, they decide to
> unilaterally change the deal and you're trapped.


Moving away from Fusion360 is easy.   Fusion allows you to save in ".STEP"
format.  I suggest you try moving a simple test project from Fusion360 to
(say) OnShape just to prove you cannot be "trapped".  (I've done this
test.  It's easy.  Some of my Fusion files are now in OnShape.)   I would
not use a CAD system that did not allow saving work in a "universal" file
format.  But then it is hard to find such a CAD system.

My "pass/fail" test for any CAD/CAM system is to make a battery powered
hand drill or a "Saws All" type tool.  A simpler test might be a computer
mouse that has a kind of free-form shape.

Another important test is the availability of high-quality training
material.   The big ones (Solid Works, OnShape Fusion360) all have this and
even have the option of paid classes where you get a live instructor.
Although most of us will use the free video classes.

-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread Todd Zuercher
I find Freecad a bit of a pain to use and it takes a lot of use to master 
(which I obviously haven't.) So I only use it occasionally for things my 
regular CAD/CAM software can't do.  The thing I use it for most, simply finding 
the center of gravity of an artwork cut out shape, so I can correctly locate 
the position to mill a hanger on the back so that it will always hang straight. 
 The only other thing I use it for is the rare occasion I might need to 
generate a tool path that sort of resembles a HSM tool path.  Two things the 
woodworking oriented software I normally use is incapable of.

Todd Zuercher
P. Graham Dunn Inc.
630 Henry Street 
Dalton, Ohio 44618
Phone:  (330)828-2105ext. 2031

-Original Message-
From: Bruce Layne  
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2021 11:46 AM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) 
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

[EXTERNAL EMAIL] Be sure links are safe.

This is my annual warning that AutoDesk isn't The Benevolent Software Company, 
and they aren't in business to give you free stuff because you're so awesome.  
AutoDesk has a history of offering free or low cost software to entice users 
into investing their time to learn the software (this may be the highest cost 
of ownership), and once you have tens or hundreds of designs in their 
proprietary CAD format, they decide to unilaterally change the deal and you're 
trapped.  They did this to me with AutoSketch, a couple of decades ago.  I had 
hundreds of hours wasted and many designs were abandoned because I couldn't 
export them.
AutoSketch was never a serious product.  It was used to migrate users to 
AutoCAD LT, and then to AutoCAD.

FreeCAD doesn't do everything you might want, but I've been very happy with it 
and I'm grateful to the open source programmers who make it possible.  If all 
you want is 2D or 2.5D CAM for LinuxCNC, it may be all you need in its current 
state.  FreeCAD is still under development, so it may have the features you 
need by the time you need them, but that's a risky proposition with free open 
source software.

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread Bruce Layne
This is my annual warning that AutoDesk isn't The Benevolent Software
Company, and they aren't in business to give you free stuff because
you're so awesome.  AutoDesk has a history of offering free or low cost
software to entice users into investing their time to learn the software
(this may be the highest cost of ownership), and once you have tens or
hundreds of designs in their proprietary CAD format, they decide to
unilaterally change the deal and you're trapped.  They did this to me
with AutoSketch, a couple of decades ago.  I had hundreds of hours
wasted and many designs were abandoned because I couldn't export them. 
AutoSketch was never a serious product.  It was used to migrate users to
AutoCAD LT, and then to AutoCAD.

FreeCAD doesn't do everything you might want, but I've been very happy
with it and I'm grateful to the open source programmers who make it
possible.  If all you want is 2D or 2.5D CAM for LinuxCNC, it may be all
you need in its current state.  FreeCAD is still under development, so
it may have the features you need by the time you need them, but that's
a risky proposition with free open source software.

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread Gerrit Visser


The hobby/free non-commercial download is on LH side of this page.
https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/free-trial

Renew it every year, free but of course limited to non-commercial use and no
4th axis etc.

Gerrit
-Original Message-
From: Thomas J Powderly [mailto:tjt...@gmail.com] 
Sent: February 3, 2021 11:03 AM
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

Hi Chris

Fusion360 looks very nice.

I see Fusion360 can run 'under linux',

that is it can run in a VM.

https://all3dp.com/2/fusion-360-for-linux-how-to-install-it/

but

what did you download?

What I see on the website
[snipped]



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread Dave Matthews
I usually find it by googling Fusion 360 for personal use or Fusion 360
hobbyist.  Gets you to https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/personal

Dave

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread Thomas J Powderly

Chris

nevermind

I found the hidden personal version

https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/personal

thx Greg Eshelman

thx

tomp

http



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-03 Thread Thomas J Powderly

Hi Chris

Fusion360 looks very nice.

I see Fusion360 can run 'under linux',

that is it can run in a VM.

https://all3dp.com/2/fusion-360-for-linux-how-to-install-it/

but

what did you download?

What I see on the website

are

a rented by year 495$ package

an educator / student package

and a 30 day trial package.


I am neither a teacher or a student.

My needs are hobbyist and 2 or 2 1/2D milling.


Thx

TomP




___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-02 Thread Gregg Eshelman via Emc-users
There's Heeks Cad/CAM. $10 for funding development. There's no limitations to 
the free version, the only difference is the free version inserts a note about 
the program at the beginning of the G-Code it outputs. Easy to delete with any 
text editor. 


On Tuesday, February 2, 2021, 12:33:20 PM MST, Chris Albertson 
 wrote:  
 
 The free Fusion360 license allows 2 and 3-axis milling, adaptive clearing,
and turning.  This is likely enough for most people.

What you can't do is 4-axis and 5-axis milling.  To enable that you do have
to pay for a license

more info here: https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/personal

The other CAD options completely lack any build-in CAM functions.  So it is
pointless.  Yes you could design using CA then hand-code you g-code but
then you loose the guarantee that the g-code follows the design because
there is an "air gap" in the work flow and it is VERY hard to make organic
looking shaps with hand made g-code.

My criteria for choosing software is "Could I use it to make a battery
operated drill with the over-molded rounded case that fits your hand.
Fusion360, even the free version would allow this if you split the case
laterally to make to halves that assemble together.    You couldn't use the
free Fusion for a one-piece model of a drill because to mill that you'd
need at least 4 axis

If you do need better CAM to run a more complex machine tool and you are on
a limited budget.  There is a way to get SolidWorks at no cost if you are
an EAA member.  SoldWorks is the only other CAD I know of that includes CAM
and can be had for zero or very low cost.  
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-02 Thread R C


On 2/2/21 2:13 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:

You are reading old posts that were at best inaccurate.  Yes, you can
import/export data in Fusion. And they do limit you to "only" 10 open
projects at the same time.  So you have to close one to open an 11th one at
the same time.  Go to the Fusion360 web site for the correct information.


That is what I just read in Dave's post




The free license for Fusion is different, but of all the free CAD/CAM
systems Fusion360 still has the best feature list. and the best support.



I'll check what the licenses are.  Free of course is always good, and of 
course comes with limitations. However, it ia a hobby that I play 
with/explore so now and then and don't want to dump mayor money in (the 
mill and lathe were given to me.)





How do you convert your FreeCAD data to G-code?   This is the biggest
problem I have with it, how to move the design to a lathe or mill.   I only
see a path for that if doing 2 1/2 D milling.



well, with freecad you can set up a job, and create a path within that 
job.  You can select  for what application/environment you want to 
create the g-code/path and linuxcnc is an option. (However I do see that 
sometimes these paths are not 'optimal'  and sometimes even wrong.  But 
again,  hey , it's free, and  with tinkering I can get around it.  (Of 
course a 'real' machine shop would never do that, of course pay for  
good quality software as an investment. With me it is not an investment, 
it is just money spent.


The g-code path is a file that you can 'export'  (I do that either with 
nfs, or even ssh/scp, so it's on the machine that runs linuxcnc.  In 
linuxcnc with axis I just pic it up, run it as a "simulation first and 
if I like what I see try to make the part.


Linuxcnc is cool, it can do a lot more than I (as a hobbyist for sure) 
would ever need.  Also, I like to tinker with electronics, the machines 
themselves, and this forum is great for that.)






On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 11:44 AM R C  wrote:


Hi Chris,

well, I am only looking into something different for making some parts
on a lathe,  I looked at fusion360, but what I hear is that you can't
'export' projects, or import, and also you can only have a few.  Not
that I do a lot of work, but it seems to be a hassle.

I have a sherline (rebranded to Paxton/Patterson mill, so that is 3 axis
as for now).

I use freecad for the mill, and that's more than I'd need already.  I
was suprised that it doesn't generate code for lathes (although, I have
the impression that people have been working on it, but not seen
something really yet.  (also I mght not know enough about machining, to
understand why it is difficult to create something for a lathe, but not
for a mill?)


There's that  gentleman here that has some modules with an interface
(sorry man forgot your name), but somehow I never got that to work in
linux cnc. (No movement, maybe I did get parameters wrong, maybe not
setup right, dunno)

So I am still looking, it is fairly easy for me to make thing is freecad,


Also, I don't have a "professional machine shop" so I am not looking to
spent significant amounts on software.


Ron



On 2/2/21 12:30 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:

The free Fusion360 license allows 2 and 3-axis milling, adaptive

clearing,

and turning.   This is likely enough for most people.

What you can't do is 4-axis and 5-axis milling.  To enable that you do

have

to pay for a license

more info here: https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/personal

The other CAD options completely lack any build-in CAM functions.  So it

is

pointless.  Yes you could design using CA then hand-code you g-code but
then you loose the guarantee that the g-code follows the design because
there is an "air gap" in the work flow and it is VERY hard to make

organic

looking shaps with hand made g-code.

My criteria for choosing software is "Could I use it to make a battery
operated drill with the over-molded rounded case that fits your hand.
Fusion360, even the free version would allow this if you split the case
laterally to make to halves that assemble together.You couldn't use

the

free Fusion for a one-piece model of a drill because to mill that you'd
need at least 4 axis

If you do need better CAM to run a more complex machine tool and you are

on

a limited budget.   There is a way to get SolidWorks at no cost if you

are

an EAA member.  SoldWorks is the only other CAD I know of that includes

CAM

and can be had for zero or very low cost.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:18 AM R C  wrote:


Hello,


I have been busy for a while with that pay check thing, and didn't have
much time to look into  creating g-code, that I can use  in linux cnc
for a lathe.


Is there anything "new" yet?  I was thinking about using fusion360,  but
I heard that is on it's way out for even a reasonable hobby priced

license


are there any alternatives?


I found this video, and was wondering how well this works, has anyone
done this?



Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-02 Thread Chris Albertson
You are reading old posts that were at best inaccurate.  Yes, you can
import/export data in Fusion. And they do limit you to "only" 10 open
projects at the same time.  So you have to close one to open an 11th one at
the same time.  Go to the Fusion360 web site for the correct information.

The free license for Fusion is different, but of all the free CAD/CAM
systems Fusion360 still has the best feature list. and the best support.

How do you convert your FreeCAD data to G-code?   This is the biggest
problem I have with it, how to move the design to a lathe or mill.   I only
see a path for that if doing 2 1/2 D milling.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 11:44 AM R C  wrote:

> Hi Chris,
>
> well, I am only looking into something different for making some parts
> on a lathe,  I looked at fusion360, but what I hear is that you can't
> 'export' projects, or import, and also you can only have a few.  Not
> that I do a lot of work, but it seems to be a hassle.
>
> I have a sherline (rebranded to Paxton/Patterson mill, so that is 3 axis
> as for now).
>
> I use freecad for the mill, and that's more than I'd need already.  I
> was suprised that it doesn't generate code for lathes (although, I have
> the impression that people have been working on it, but not seen
> something really yet.  (also I mght not know enough about machining, to
> understand why it is difficult to create something for a lathe, but not
> for a mill?)
>
>
> There's that  gentleman here that has some modules with an interface
> (sorry man forgot your name), but somehow I never got that to work in
> linux cnc. (No movement, maybe I did get parameters wrong, maybe not
> setup right, dunno)
>
> So I am still looking, it is fairly easy for me to make thing is freecad,
>
>
> Also, I don't have a "professional machine shop" so I am not looking to
> spent significant amounts on software.
>
>
> Ron
>
>
>
> On 2/2/21 12:30 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> > The free Fusion360 license allows 2 and 3-axis milling, adaptive
> clearing,
> > and turning.   This is likely enough for most people.
> >
> > What you can't do is 4-axis and 5-axis milling.  To enable that you do
> have
> > to pay for a license
> >
> > more info here: https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/personal
> >
> > The other CAD options completely lack any build-in CAM functions.  So it
> is
> > pointless.  Yes you could design using CA then hand-code you g-code but
> > then you loose the guarantee that the g-code follows the design because
> > there is an "air gap" in the work flow and it is VERY hard to make
> organic
> > looking shaps with hand made g-code.
> >
> > My criteria for choosing software is "Could I use it to make a battery
> > operated drill with the over-molded rounded case that fits your hand.
> > Fusion360, even the free version would allow this if you split the case
> > laterally to make to halves that assemble together.You couldn't use
> the
> > free Fusion for a one-piece model of a drill because to mill that you'd
> > need at least 4 axis
> >
> > If you do need better CAM to run a more complex machine tool and you are
> on
> > a limited budget.   There is a way to get SolidWorks at no cost if you
> are
> > an EAA member.  SoldWorks is the only other CAD I know of that includes
> CAM
> > and can be had for zero or very low cost.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:18 AM R C  wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >> I have been busy for a while with that pay check thing, and didn't have
> >> much time to look into  creating g-code, that I can use  in linux cnc
> >> for a lathe.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there anything "new" yet?  I was thinking about using fusion360,  but
> >> I heard that is on it's way out for even a reasonable hobby priced
> license
> >>
> >>
> >> are there any alternatives?
> >>
> >>
> >> I found this video, and was wondering how well this works, has anyone
> >> done this?
> >>
> >>
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuimIOZcty8
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ___
> >> Emc-users mailing list
> >> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> >>
> >
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-02 Thread Dave Matthews
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 2:44 PM R C  wrote:

> Hi Chris,
>
> well, I am only looking into something different for making some parts
> on a lathe,  I looked at fusion360, but what I hear is that you can't
> 'export' projects, or import, and also you can only have a few.  Not
> that I do a lot of work, but it seems to be a hassle.
>
>
You heard wrong.  You can import/export in a few formats and the project
limit is for active projects.  Basically click to archive one and click
again to make an archived one active.  I think the limit is 10 active.

Dave

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-02 Thread Mark Wendt
He's asking about for software for a lathe, not a mill.

Mark

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 2:33 PM Chris Albertson 
wrote:

> The free Fusion360 license allows 2 and 3-axis milling, adaptive clearing,
> and turning.   This is likely enough for most people.
>
> What you can't do is 4-axis and 5-axis milling.  To enable that you do have
> to pay for a license
>
> more info here: https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/personal
>
> The other CAD options completely lack any build-in CAM functions.  So it is
> pointless.  Yes you could design using CA then hand-code you g-code but
> then you loose the guarantee that the g-code follows the design because
> there is an "air gap" in the work flow and it is VERY hard to make organic
> looking shaps with hand made g-code.
>
> My criteria for choosing software is "Could I use it to make a battery
> operated drill with the over-molded rounded case that fits your hand.
> Fusion360, even the free version would allow this if you split the case
> laterally to make to halves that assemble together.You couldn't use the
> free Fusion for a one-piece model of a drill because to mill that you'd
> need at least 4 axis
>
> If you do need better CAM to run a more complex machine tool and you are on
> a limited budget.   There is a way to get SolidWorks at no cost if you are
> an EAA member.  SoldWorks is the only other CAD I know of that includes CAM
> and can be had for zero or very low cost.
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:18 AM R C  wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > I have been busy for a while with that pay check thing, and didn't have
> > much time to look into  creating g-code, that I can use  in linux cnc
> > for a lathe.
> >
> >
> > Is there anything "new" yet?  I was thinking about using fusion360,  but
> > I heard that is on it's way out for even a reasonable hobby priced
> license
> >
> >
> > are there any alternatives?
> >
> >
> > I found this video, and was wondering how well this works, has anyone
> > done this?
> >
> >
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuimIOZcty8
>

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-02 Thread R C

Hi Chris,

well, I am only looking into something different for making some parts 
on a lathe,  I looked at fusion360, but what I hear is that you can't  
'export' projects, or import, and also you can only have a few.  Not 
that I do a lot of work, but it seems to be a hassle.


I have a sherline (rebranded to Paxton/Patterson mill, so that is 3 axis 
as for now).


I use freecad for the mill, and that's more than I'd need already.  I 
was suprised that it doesn't generate code for lathes (although, I have 
the impression that people have been working on it, but not seen 
something really yet.  (also I mght not know enough about machining, to 
understand why it is difficult to create something for a lathe, but not 
for a mill?)



There's that  gentleman here that has some modules with an interface 
(sorry man forgot your name), but somehow I never got that to work in 
linux cnc. (No movement, maybe I did get parameters wrong, maybe not 
setup right, dunno)


So I am still looking, it is fairly easy for me to make thing is freecad,


Also, I don't have a "professional machine shop" so I am not looking to 
spent significant amounts on software.



Ron



On 2/2/21 12:30 PM, Chris Albertson wrote:

The free Fusion360 license allows 2 and 3-axis milling, adaptive clearing,
and turning.   This is likely enough for most people.

What you can't do is 4-axis and 5-axis milling.  To enable that you do have
to pay for a license

more info here: https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/personal

The other CAD options completely lack any build-in CAM functions.  So it is
pointless.  Yes you could design using CA then hand-code you g-code but
then you loose the guarantee that the g-code follows the design because
there is an "air gap" in the work flow and it is VERY hard to make organic
looking shaps with hand made g-code.

My criteria for choosing software is "Could I use it to make a battery
operated drill with the over-molded rounded case that fits your hand.
Fusion360, even the free version would allow this if you split the case
laterally to make to halves that assemble together.You couldn't use the
free Fusion for a one-piece model of a drill because to mill that you'd
need at least 4 axis

If you do need better CAM to run a more complex machine tool and you are on
a limited budget.   There is a way to get SolidWorks at no cost if you are
an EAA member.  SoldWorks is the only other CAD I know of that includes CAM
and can be had for zero or very low cost.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:18 AM R C  wrote:


Hello,


I have been busy for a while with that pay check thing, and didn't have
much time to look into  creating g-code, that I can use  in linux cnc
for a lathe.


Is there anything "new" yet?  I was thinking about using fusion360,  but
I heard that is on it's way out for even a reasonable hobby priced license


are there any alternatives?


I found this video, and was wondering how well this works, has anyone
done this?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuimIOZcty8



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users






___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-02 Thread Chris Albertson
The free Fusion360 license allows 2 and 3-axis milling, adaptive clearing,
and turning.   This is likely enough for most people.

What you can't do is 4-axis and 5-axis milling.  To enable that you do have
to pay for a license

more info here: https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/personal

The other CAD options completely lack any build-in CAM functions.  So it is
pointless.  Yes you could design using CA then hand-code you g-code but
then you loose the guarantee that the g-code follows the design because
there is an "air gap" in the work flow and it is VERY hard to make organic
looking shaps with hand made g-code.

My criteria for choosing software is "Could I use it to make a battery
operated drill with the over-molded rounded case that fits your hand.
Fusion360, even the free version would allow this if you split the case
laterally to make to halves that assemble together.You couldn't use the
free Fusion for a one-piece model of a drill because to mill that you'd
need at least 4 axis

If you do need better CAM to run a more complex machine tool and you are on
a limited budget.   There is a way to get SolidWorks at no cost if you are
an EAA member.  SoldWorks is the only other CAD I know of that includes CAM
and can be had for zero or very low cost.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:18 AM R C  wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> I have been busy for a while with that pay check thing, and didn't have
> much time to look into  creating g-code, that I can use  in linux cnc
> for a lathe.
>
>
> Is there anything "new" yet?  I was thinking about using fusion360,  but
> I heard that is on it's way out for even a reasonable hobby priced license
>
>
> are there any alternatives?
>
>
> I found this video, and was wondering how well this works, has anyone
> done this?
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuimIOZcty8
>
>
>
> ___
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>


-- 

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


[Emc-users] lathe paths with linux cnc and CAD software

2021-02-02 Thread R C

Hello,


I have been busy for a while with that pay check thing, and didn't have 
much time to look into  creating g-code, that I can use  in linux cnc 
for a lathe.



Is there anything "new" yet?  I was thinking about using fusion360,  but 
I heard that is on it's way out for even a reasonable hobby priced license



are there any alternatives?


I found this video, and was wondering how well this works, has anyone 
done this?



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuimIOZcty8



___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users


Re: [Emc-users] Lathe Spindle Rebuild Quistions

2020-06-17 Thread Curtis Dutton
I want to thank everyone for your advice and encouragement on replacing my
5c lathe spindle bearings.

I was able to replace the bearings in the spindle. The spindle "locknut"
was pressed on instead of threaded on. I had to build an aluminum collar
with steel dowel pins that engaged on the bearing spacers (which had holes
for this purpose) to press it apart.  I could tell that coolant had entered
the bearing housing by getting around the front labyrinth seal and is
ultimately what had ruined the front bearing.

Other than that I had to purchase a parts washer and cleaned the heck out
of everything. I found a set screw hole on the front seal and have
installed an air fitting in its place for air purge. That should reduce the
chances of that type of failure occurring again.

Packed the bearings with "high speed synthetic bearing grease." With a
little warming all bearings installed smoothly like in the youtube video.
It was a very nice to have that video as a reference and really helped with
reassembly.

I ran it in over a period of 2 days. Incrementally increasing RPMS and
watching temperatures, keeping the spindle body itself under ~105
fahrenheit or comfortable to touch with hands, waiting for temperature to
drop, then increasing speed by about 250 rpm. Now it will run cool at
3000rpm for an hour or so, getting up to about 90 degrees. I'm not sure
what my rpm upper limit should be but that seems fairly fast.

Obviously time will really tell but it has continued to run very smooth and
quiet. After a test cut last night the parts are actually round now. Went
from around .0005" out of round to at most .5" out of round and surface
finish seems much improved.


Thanks again all!

-Curtis

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:25 PM Curtis Dutton  wrote:

> Agreed. We will do the best we can and break in very slowly. I'll read up
> on break in procedures and we have temp probes that we can use to watch it.
>
> Thanks all for the info!
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:20 PM Thaddeus Waldner 
> wrote:
>
>> I’ll chime in on the importance of a clean environment. They usually spec
>> a ultra high purity grease for lubricant.
>>
>> They also usually have a fairly specific break-in routine. I.e a pair of
>> temperature probes, one near each bearing, then run the spindle, starting
>> at a slow speed. Gradually increase The speed to max over several hours,
>> all the while keeping an eye on the temps.
>>
>> Definitely *don’t* spin it up right away to “see how it runs.”
>>
>> > On May 27, 2020, at 1:32 PM, Curtis Dutton  wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes that youtube video seems to be very helpful. I've been watching it
>> for
>> > the last few days.
>> >
>> > Well we will give it a try then and see how it pans out.
>> >
>> > Thanks all
>> >
>> >> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 2:03 PM Leonardo Marsaglia <
>> ldmarsag...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I've never took apart the ones in the Mazak (Wich I asked for quotation
>> >> once)but I disassembled other lathes that were similar and it's not
>> that
>> >> much of a pain. Surely you must make some tooling sometimes to get
>> things
>> >> done right but nothing else.
>> >>
>> >> 5.000 to 7.000 sounds about what they would charge for it. From what I
>> >> remember the tricky part is to guarantee a free dust and grit assembly.
>> >> They claimed to have a dust controlled environment much like a
>> >> semiconductor factory but I suspect part of that is marketing.
>> >>
>> >> One common approach for big lathes is two double row roller bearings
>> with a
>> >> thrust bearing for the axial load.
>> >>
>> >> Leonardo Marsaglia
>> >>
>> >> El mié., 27 may. 2020 14:51, Jon Elson 
>> escribió:
>> >>
>> >>> On 05/27/2020 12:18 PM, Curtis Dutton wrote:
>>  So after finishing the retrofit of the old Miyano gang lathe the
>> >> spindle
>>  bearings are shot. You can grab the spindle nose and push it side to
>> >> side
>>  about .0005" to .001". The cut quality is also fairly bad. Just
>> >> cutting a
>>  spring pass on an aluminum bar shows a lot of chatter like marks.
>> 
>>  I can also measure a .0005" to .001"  axial play by pushing on the
>> face
>> >>> or
>>  the collet closer of the spindle. Not to mention there is roughness
>> and
>>  fairly loud bearing noise while running.
>> 
>>  I expected this but I'm looking for someone that can refurbish it or
>> >> any
>>  advice from others that have done this before. I haven't ever sent
>> >>> anything
>>  out to be rebuilt so I'm ignorant on the process.
>>  One online quote I received was 4500 to 6500. Is that reasonable?
>> Does
>>  anyone know of someone or have pointers? I'm not opposed to trying to
>> >> do
>> >>> it
>>  myself but I know it would be very challenging to get it right. I'm
>> >> sure
>>  I'd need to order 2 sets of bearings... One for the first attempt and
>> >> one
>>  to get it right!
>> 
>> >>> Well, it may not be that tricky.  It is probably just a pair
>> >>> 

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >