Re: [Eug-lug] faceybook....

2011-07-20 Thread Ben Barrett
Anyone remember our old geek code?
Who was Seth++ and who was not... and so forth...


On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Hippy Nerd hippyn...@gmail.com wrote:

 I should have posted both!


 On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:21 PM, David Nelson da...@davidnelson.netwrote:

  I think you meant….
 *+1*

 :P

  On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Hippy Nerd wrote:

 [like]

 On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:19 AM, seymoor nates mikem...@efn.org wrote:

  Aw Pop, he started it . . .

 (I'll be better, I promise).

 On 7/18/2011 9:54 PM, Hippy Nerd wrote:
  Both of you, off to bed with no desert.
 
  Dont make me come up there. to tell you to go to sleep.

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug



 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug



 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


[Eug-lug] means to and end?

2011-07-20 Thread Ben Barrett
I wish to ask the group:  (as in, whomever cares to read, consider, and
respond)

Do we as a group want to use social networks to further the group itself?


It seems to me that we're free to carry on and be unique as members, of
course,
but that we might want to agree as a group about some of this.
There doesn't seem to be much interest in growing the group, lately;
maybe this is because the ITProForum is filling the hungry niche,
or everyone's busy working and linux is no longer just for the zealous.

Curious,

Ben
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] means to and end?

2011-07-20 Thread Ben Barrett
Oh, that's a good point.  Meetup has gotten very popular.  Are we okay with
popular/populist outlets and tools?

It does seem to go against the grain of the spirit of our movement...

Ben


On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:51 PM, David Nelson da...@davidnelson.net wrote:

  I am relatively new to the group (also went to ITProForum for the first
 time last night) so take my opinion with a grain of salt…

 I had been meaning to come to meetings for quite some time but it's easy
 for a time and date to get lost in a flurry of email. If there was a
 Facebook event people got invited to, as well as regular reminders on
 Google+ and/or Twitter, it might help other people like me actually make it
 to a meeting once in a while.

 That said, I think those things should be used primarily to promote the
 group rather than making them yet another venue for discussion… at work our
 tech group has a mailing list, a blog, a wiki and probably something else I
 am forgetting. There is no clear purpose for one or the other, so
 communication is pretty fragmented and people use one or the other depending
 on personal preference. I would not want to see that happen here.

 To sum it up: I like the idea if it stays focused and doesn't pull activity
 away from this list.

 Thanks for listening!
 David

  On Wednesday, July 20, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Ben Barrett wrote:

 I wish to ask the group:  (as in, whomever cares to read, consider, and
 respond)

 Do we as a group want to use social networks to further the group itself?


 It seems to me that we're free to carry on and be unique as members, of
 course,
 but that we might want to agree as a group about some of this.
 There doesn't seem to be much interest in growing the group, lately;
 maybe this is because the ITProForum is filling the hungry niche,
 or everyone's busy working and linux is no longer just for the zealous.

 Curious,

 Ben

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug



 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] faceybook....

2011-07-19 Thread Ben Barrett
There seems to be a prevalent tone about Facebook.  It seems to be implied
to be uncool to use it unless you justify yourself.

Can we tone down the zeal and stick to what we're good at, please?

[Skipping snerky I use Facebook to grow all the food I eat quip here]

The OP was about open community to support GNU/Linux and Open Source,
so let's try to help each other rather than flinging poo about what's not
cool.

Please?  I do enjoy the jokes... but...

Ben

PS - yeah I'm on Google Plus too.  That doesn't appear to be open-source
either, but it does appear to give users more control of their content, its
future use, and their rights.




On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Russell Johnson r...@dimstar.net wrote:


 On Jul 18, 2011, at 9:28 PM, seymoor nates wrote:

  Actually one of those pretty much sums up a facecrook profile.  Or if by
 one of those you mean one who refrains from consuming every manic fad that
 comes along . . .

 On 7/18/2011 9:12 PM, Alan wrote:

 Ah, you're one of those then. Nevermind.
 **plonk**

 Then there are those of us who use FB to keep in touch with people we've
 actually met, write messages to those people and generally keep in touch.
 But I don't play the games, I don't take the surveys, I don't do the other
 stuff.

  Russell Johnson
 r...@dimstar.net




 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] faceybook....

2011-07-18 Thread Ben Barrett
What did you find?  This one?
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=11330462991
It's not a proper group, but rather a personal account... and was created
there only about a year ago.
Anyone can start a group or another account though, so it's hard to say
something is official if it goes unchallenged.

Thanks Jamie,

ben


On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Hippy Nerd hippyn...@gmail.com wrote:

 I just checked the faceycrack, and theres a euglug thing, yay.

 The thing I want to know is, why anyone has to ask for permission to join?
 is this also true of the mailinglist?

 These should both be open to anyone, afterall, the core of our ideology is
 openness and transparency.

 Have things changed? are we about being open or are we about hiding and
 keeping secrets now?

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] faceybook....

2011-07-18 Thread Ben Barrett
I'm proud of your Seymoor.  Do you use twitter?


On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:32 PM, seymoor nates mikem...@efn.org wrote:

 No offense but you couldn't pay me to log on at face crook.  (Don't even
 go there unless I can do it anonymously).

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Bot infection stored in MBR

2011-06-30 Thread Ben Barrett
I'm afraid that statement is simply not true, Ed!
Malware developers work on MANY platforms, ranging from handheld devices to
power-plant-control systems.
Windows may still be the primary target platform, but *certainly* not the
only one!!
There exists malware for Linux, and for OS X, etc.  Malware tries to be
invisible, which may be why you haven't seen it.
Where there's a profit (and power-and-control as well as intelligence can
be profitized), there's a motive...

BenB


On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Edward Craig epcr...@gmail.com wrote:

 Well, Windows is the only platform malware authors develop for. When
 they get around to Linux we'll know Linux has arrived. I have never
 seen malware, myself, but I've been using non-Windows PCs since 1997.

 On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 13:28, Timothy J. Wiley tjwi...@gmail.com wrote:
  So you're implying that only Windows is currently vulnerable to attacks?
  Wow.
 
  On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:04 PM, abr...@peak.org wrote:
 
  Neither.  I am talking about the next generation infection which
  installs a VM under your OS.  There has been talk of this for
  a while, but so far as I know none yet exists.  But installing
  in the MBR is a critical element of any such VM infection.
  --
  Allen Brown  abrown at peak.org
 http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
   A bug is a test case you haven't written yet. --- Mark Pilgrim
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Timothy J. Wiley tjwi...@gmail.com
  To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
  Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 12:47:59 PM
  Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Bot infection stored in MBR
 
 
  Vulnerable to what? This particular infection or infections in general?
 
 
  On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:04 AM,  abr...@peak.org  wrote:
 
 
  This seems like a small step away from booting into a virtual
  machine. At that point all OSs are vulnerable, not just
  Windoze.
 
  --
  Allen Brown abrown at peak.org http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
  Plug-and-Play is really nice, unfortunately it only works 50% of the
  time. To be specific the Plug almost always works. ---unknown source
 
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Mr O  notanathe...@yahoo.com 
  To: abr...@peak.org , Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group 
  euglug@euglug.org 
  Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:46:53 AM
  Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Bot infection stored in MBR
 
  Nothing new here. Move along.
 
 
  --- On Thu, 6/30/11, Allen Brown  abr...@peak.org  wrote:
 
   From: Allen Brown  abr...@peak.org 
   Subject: [Eug-lug] Bot infection stored in MBR
   To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group  euglug@euglug.org 
   Date: Thursday, June 30, 2011, 10:34 AM
   http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13973805
   --
   Allen Brown abrown at peak.org
 http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
   Is there another word for synonym? ---
   George Carlin
 
 
 
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 



 --
 Edward P. Craig
 Think this through with me. Let me know your mind  Hunter/Garcia
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] help!

2011-06-27 Thread Ben Barrett
If it is older hardware, it would probably help to list its specs and/or
limitations.
(will the bios allow it to boot from a USB device, for example?)
Also, is this a linux newbie and/or do they already have a particular flavor
of linux in mind?

ciao :)


On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Julie Baumler j...@baumler.com wrote:

 Hi Hannah -

 We meet every Thursday evening.You can also ask any questions here on
 the list.  Hope to meet you soon!

 Julie

 On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Hannah Glass cartagenagl...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hello Eugene,
 
  I want to help a friend convert their Toshiba to Linux. When is the next
  meeting this summer so I could get help from you all? Thanks!
 
  All best,
 
  Hannah M Glass
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google Docs

2011-05-26 Thread Ben Barrett
So, a few questions:
1. Do you require real-time collaboration?
2. Is obscurity enough security for your images (and document as a whole)?
2a.  Could you use screen-quality image versions for the composition of the
work, and swap in print-quality ones later?
3. Does your solution need to be cheap-or-free?

-Ben


On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:10 AM, JS Kaplan kg...@hotmail.com wrote:

  I forgot, uploading a PDF also gets you images with Google Docs. For
 example, here's our local ham radio club newsletter:


 https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=vpid=explorerchrome=truesrcid=0B4g_J4lkPJMWMjhhMDY1ZTAtOTg4MS00ODkwLTgxNjctYWRhYmE1YjIyNjlmhl=en_US

 --Kaplan

 *Melita! domi adsum.
 Honey! I'm home.
 *Henry Beard, *Latin for All 
 Occasions*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_for_all_Occasions
 .





 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] How to summon the open with dialog from a bash command line?

2011-04-21 Thread Ben Barrett
I believe that would be dependent on your window manager, or at least that
you could summon a Gnome or KDE panel only if those libraries were available
on the given system so you may have trouble making something open
everywhere unless you make your own X component for it or find one to
re-use... you might be able to look into Nautilus (gnome) or Konqueror (kde)
file browsers for a nice function...
Don't know more, but this set off some blinky warning lights in my head :)

Ben


On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:43 PM, marbux mar...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi, all,

 I'm working on a cross-platform Lua script that needs to, inter alia,
 summon an Open With dialog from a Bash command line, the dialog that
 typically pops up when a file has no app associated with it in the
 environment. But I'm having no luck finding how to do that. Anyone
 here happen to know the answer or some keywords that might help me
 track it down?

 FWIW and in case it's of any use to someone else, I found the
 equivalent command line for Windows:

 Rundll32.exe shell32.dll, OpenAs_RunDLL [filepath]

 Thanks in advance,

 Paul
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] How to summon the open with dialog from a bashcommand line?

2011-04-21 Thread Ben Barrett
I would guess that a custom solution for this would be difficult if you
really don't know anything about the environment it is running in.. for
example, where do users have their apps installed??  If said tool is being
built for a known environment then it is easy, right?  :)
If there is a list of preferred and common utilities you want to suggest,
you could use which, whereis, etc to confirm their existence and location...
but for the most generalized solution I think you'd be best using existing
tools in KDE or Gnome since they're the most common.

So, what about ncurses?  You like it?  There is a curses module for Lua at
http://www.t2-project.org/packages/lua-curses.html but I'm not clear what
you're getting at...

Ben


On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:37 PM, brads...@fastmail.us wrote:

 How about using ncurses?
 Sent via BlackBerry by ATT

 -Original Message-
 From: larry price lapr...@gmail.com
 Sender: euglug-boun...@euglug.org
 Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:05:45
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Groupeuglug@euglug.org
 Reply-To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] How to summon the open with dialog from a bash
  command line?

 Ben is correct, this is going to be different from one window manager
 to the next.

 Here's a nice intro to gnome-open which is what you would want to use on
 ubuntu

 http://embraceubuntu.com/2006/12/16/gnome-open-open-anything-from-the-command-line/

 in OS X you would use open

 But for historical reasons this means something completely different
 in the world of linux (usually but not always an alias for openvt),
 which only works when you are using the console, and will fail if you
 are in a GUI.

 On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  I believe that would be dependent on your window manager, or at least
 that
  you could summon a Gnome or KDE panel only if those libraries were
 available
  on the given system so you may have trouble making something open
  everywhere unless you make your own X component for it or find one to
  re-use... you might be able to look into Nautilus (gnome) or Konqueror
 (kde)
  file browsers for a nice function...
  Don't know more, but this set off some blinky warning lights in my head
 :)
 
  Ben
 
 
  On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:43 PM, marbux mar...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hi, all,
 
  I'm working on a cross-platform Lua script that needs to, inter alia,
  summon an Open With dialog from a Bash command line, the dialog that
  typically pops up when a file has no app associated with it in the
  environment. But I'm having no luck finding how to do that. Anyone
  here happen to know the answer or some keywords that might help me
  track it down?
 
  FWIW and in case it's of any use to someone else, I found the
  equivalent command line for Windows:
 
  Rundll32.exe shell32.dll, OpenAs_RunDLL [filepath]
 
  Thanks in advance,
 
  Paul
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Beaver Bar Camp 7 is coming up April 9

2011-04-08 Thread Ben Barrett
Where are you located, Kent?  I am planning on going up...  anyone else??


On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Kent Loobey k...@uoregon.edu wrote:

 On Tuesday 22 March 2011 09:47:08 Kent Loobey wrote:
  On Monday 21 March 2011 17:50:49 Ben Barrett wrote:
   You just can't keep up with the wiki wiki :)
   http://beaverbarcamp.org/index.php/Beaver_BarCamp6 says 2010
 (correctly),
   so it seems like logical confirmation that BBC7 is in 2011, FWIW ;)
  
   Anyone prefer to arrange carpool via this list or will folks be
   populating that wiki node?
   I'd like to go, and could drive if no fancier cars are available...
 
  I would like to go but I need a ride to do it.

 I would really like to go to this.  I have checked the bus schedule and on
 Saturday the bus leaves at 6:40 AM going to Corvallis and the latest one
 returning is at 2:55 PM.  I would need to stay overnight if I take the bus.

 So if anyone is going from here that could take a rider I would sure
 appreciate it.

 
   Ben
 
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Beaver Bar Camp 7 is coming up April 9

2011-03-22 Thread Ben Barrett
Thanks Bob!  What is this foo-bar you speak of?  It sounds like some sort of
mythic reference
that deserves some historical context.  Partly kidding...
I know that foo and bar have been used as names for arbitrary variables,
similar to X and Y for algebra,
but does anyone know if there is a connection to the old acronym, which I
think came from the military sphere,
fubar:  f'ed up beyond all recognition  (which might also relate to snafu:
situation normal, all )
???

:)


On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Bob Miller k...@jogger-egg.com wrote:

 History.

 Once upon a time, Tim O'Reilly (O'Reilly Publishing) invited
 hundreds of interesting people to an unconference called
 FOO (Friends Of O'Reilly).  It had no published program, but
 participants were invited to present talks about whatever was
 interesting them at the time.

 Since FOO was invitation-only, a bunch of people who weren't
 invited started the Bar Camps.  (foo - bar, get it?)  The theme
 is the same: no published program, please bring something
 interesting.  And there are many Bar Camps worldwide.

 I went to the first Beaver Bar Camp.  About half the people there
 presented at least one talk.  I'm planning to go to this one too.
 I don't have any talks in mind yet.

 On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Kent Loobey k...@uoregon.edu wrote:
  On Monday 21 March 2011 16:49:07 Larry Price wrote:
  Just a reminder to all of us interested in geeky activities.
 
  http://beaverbarcamp.org/index.php/Beaver_BarCamp7
 
  Is coming up.
 
  I'm planning on doing a workshop on using PostGIS to manipulate spatial
  data, with examples using the City of Albany shapefiles that are
 available
  online and some hackery I'm doing with the GoWalla api.
 
  So what is a Beaver Bar Camp about?  PostGIS?  Will the workshops be
 posted
  before the event date?
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 



 --
 Bob Miller  Kbob
 k...@jogger-egg.com
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Beaver Bar Camp 7 is coming up April 9

2011-03-21 Thread Ben Barrett
You just can't keep up with the wiki wiki :)
http://beaverbarcamp.org/index.php/Beaver_BarCamp6 says 2010 (correctly),
so it seems like logical confirmation that BBC7 is in 2011, FWIW ;)

Anyone prefer to arrange carpool via this list or will folks be populating
that wiki node?
I'd like to go, and could drive if no fancier cars are available...

Ben


On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, abr...@peak.org wrote:

 That web site says the event is in 2010.  I've heard it is
 April 9, 2011.
 --
 Allen Brown  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
  CAUTION: Not for internal use. If swallowed,
  use Microsoft software to induce vomiting.

 - Original Message -
 From: Larry Price lapr...@gmail.com
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 4:49:07 PM
 Subject: [Eug-lug] Beaver Bar Camp 7 is coming up April 9




 Just a reminder to all of us interested in geeky activities.


 http://beaverbarcamp.org/index.php/Beaver_BarCamp7


 Is coming up.


 I'm planning on doing a workshop on using PostGIS to manipulate spatial
 data, with examples using the City of Albany shapefiles that are available
 online and some hackery I'm doing with the GoWalla api.


 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Beaver Bar Camp 7 is coming up April 9

2011-03-21 Thread Ben Barrett
Hello, hello!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BarCamp
http://barcamp.org

:)
bye


On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:58 PM, abr...@peak.org wrote:

 BBC is a get-together for people who do interesting things.
 (I don't know any other way to describe it.)

 A group of us will show the Reprap we are building.
 http://reprap.org/wiki/Main_Page
 We got together to start this project at the last BBC,
 with some of us meeting for the first time there.
 --
 Allen Brown  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
   Anything worth doing is worth overdoing. --- Allen Brown


 - Original Message -
 From: Kent Loobey k...@uoregon.edu
 To: euglug@euglug.org
 Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 7:20:35 PM
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Beaver Bar Camp 7 is coming up April 9

 On Monday 21 March 2011 16:49:07 Larry Price wrote:
  Just a reminder to all of us interested in geeky activities.
 
  http://beaverbarcamp.org/index.php/Beaver_BarCamp7
 
  Is coming up.
 
  I'm planning on doing a workshop on using PostGIS to manipulate spatial
  data, with examples using the City of Albany shapefiles that are
 available
  online and some hackery I'm doing with the GoWalla api.

 So what is a Beaver Bar Camp about?  PostGIS?  Will the workshops be
 posted
 before the event date?
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] [Fwd: solve one problem, create another problem]

2011-02-21 Thread Ben Barrett
Howdy, I think this is what you want:

https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Grub2#Reinstalling%20from%20LiveCD

I was going to suggest chroot, but I see that is the 3rd option there!

Here is one more I found via google, nice and short and not terribly out of
date:
http://karuppuswamy.com/wordpress/2010/06/02/how-to-chroot-to-ubuntu-using-live-cd-to-fix-grub-rescue-prompt/

Beware if your ubuntu is older it might be grub and not grub2...

Ben


On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 8:35 PM, morg...@efn.org wrote:

  Original Message 
 Subject: solve one problem, create another problem
 From:morg...@efn.org
 Date:Mon, February 21, 2011 5:01 pm
 To:  eug...@euglug.net
 --

 I have my system set up as a dual boot with XP and Ubuntu.  I was
 able to resize, enlarge the Ubuntu partition and it looks like all of
 the information is intact, but when I lost the dual boot in doing
 this.  XP runs, but I cannot get the dual boot to include Ubuntu.  I
 have a live CD for Ubuntu and when I go to reinstall I get as far as
 manually installing on the correct partition but I get a message that
 says that I need to specify a partition for the root file.

 No root file system is defined
 Please correct this from the partitioning menu

 I have the options of
 /
 /boot
 /home
 /tmp
 /usr
 /var
 /srv
 /opt
 /user/local

 and it seems that none of these options are working for me.
 Where I need to install/repair the installation is   /media/sda/7
 hopefully without erasing anything.
 What am I missing?

 Wes Morgan





 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] slow system

2011-01-28 Thread Ben Barrett
Hey, no need to send this or core dumps, to the list, now :)  You can tell a
lot about a system from an lsof dump; you'll also notice Permission denied
on items which require more access (use root if you want to see all)... hope
you're enjoying learning all about your system!

268 was the number of open file handles by firefox (not the # of processes),
roughly speaking, at the time you ran that — however, grep could have
matched on something else such as a path with firefox in a folder name,
whether related to a firefox process or not...
vmstat and lsof are reporting on realtime info about the processes you're
running, as netstat does for netwo.

How to read them is well-documented, although it is much more info than most
users ever need to know.
Google for more or select these random/non-preferred resources:
http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/lsof.html
http://www.helpmehost.com/linux/reading-vmstat-in-linux-part-1/
also http://www.linuxhowtos.org/Network/netstat.htm

All three of these commands will prefer to the PID of a running process, if
you like; but firefox generally has many related PIDs.

Just noticed Chris's response, which is a good summary for your situation.
 If you have very large local mailboxes, that might be crunching your
disks... desktop search/indexing might also be too much for your system, so
try disabling that if it was on :)

Hope this is making more sense now,

Ben

PS - you may be able to use smartd or even new GUI front-ends for it, to see
if your drive have any self-reported failures, check smartd's man page or
for example,
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/know-when-your-drives-are-failing-smartd



On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Joseph Weston Morgan morg...@efn.orgwrote:

  *with the vmstat -n 5*,* I get a long list, which this is part of,
 *
 procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io -system--
 cpu
  r   b   swpdfree buff  cache   sisobi  bo
in  csus   sy i  d  wa
  0  0   32446640   44316  1858244242387   148393
 1680   47   131723
 *how do you read this?*

 *and with lsof|grep firefox|wc -l, I get*
 wes@kathy:~$ lsof|grep firefox|wc -l
 268
 *Is this the number of processes that are running?*
 *
 With just the lsof I get a huge amount of information, and I don't know how
 to read it either.*


 thunderbi 1960wes  mem   REG8,6   1392569274309
 /var/cache/fontconfig/365b55f210c0a22e9a19e35191240f32-le32d4.cache-3

 ...clipped...
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] slow system

2011-01-24 Thread Ben Barrett
vmstat with the -n option would probably give more clear and pointed
information about resource utilization (albeit not relative to any specific
processes), if you're trying to see where you become swap-bound or
disk-bound, etc.  So vmstat -n 5 in its own terminal...

lsof is another very useful tool, not sure if you've got it by default; but
you can do simple piping such as
lsof|grep firefox|wc -l
to see how many handles firefox has open, for example.  Maybe there are
easier ways to do that, but that is how I learned.

Agreed about Firefox not always closing out properly on linux, I find
firefox-bin is the name of the process that hangs around most often, so
killall helps there.  I have not seen that problem much on Winders or Mac
builds.

Ben


On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Horst knoblauch137-0...@yahoo.com wrote:

 ...
  then start other apps, then firefox with increasing Tabs and demands.

 i.e. *before* you reboot, set firefox General to start with a blank page,
 not to restore previous Tabs.

 You can also slow down top refresh to 5 sec or more for easier snapshots:
  top -d 5


  - Horst

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] slow system

2011-01-23 Thread Ben Barrett
A few thoughts:

1) Load is relative to the # of CPU's (including hyperthreaded).  So 2 is
not high for a dual-core or a single-core hyperthreaded.  5 is high for that
sort of system, but then, not for a hyperthreaded quad-core :)  I get the
drift that this system is older, but I did not see any reference to the # of
cpu's.

2) Good points were made about Firefox and its extensions.  Hope that
helped!

3) You mentioned Compiz was running.  Do you have hardware accelerated 3D?
Even if so, IIRC some of compiz functions might tax the CPU quite a bit, and
that could be relative to you screen res... multiple screens could also
exacerbate this.

4) Is this a DDR, DDR2, etc, system?  Stuffing more RAM on a slow bus
might not help as much as you'd hope... which might point you toward a mobo
upgrade.

5) Gkrellm is neat and I'm also one of those freaks who runs it all the time
on all the systems, but I always turn its update frequency down from 10/sec
to 2 or 3/sec... this seems to help on slow systems!

Hope this helps,

Ben





On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Joseph Weston Morgan morg...@efn.orgwrote:

  Unfortunately not.  I would need a new motherboard.



 On 01/23/2011 12:22 PM, abr...@peak.org wrote:
  Any chance you could stuff more RAM into it?  It looks hungry to me.

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Certificates

2011-01-17 Thread Ben Barrett
Are you working from this thread's info?
http://forums.novell.com/novell-product-support-forums/identity-manager/im-userapp-workflow/425036-godaddy-jboss-2.html


On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Kaplan kg7fu97...@gmail.com wrote:

 There is an Apache certificate howto on godaddy. No help there then I
 wonder if your build is
 missing a key (sorry pun) item?

 --Kaplan
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


[Eug-lug] ubuntu disc available?

2011-01-12 Thread Ben Barrett
Howdy folks, I've got a friend who wants an ubuntu disc, and I thought I'd
ask around before downloading and burning a fresh one...

He's got a P4 2.6Ghz w/ 1GB RAM, also a a five year old Dell Inspiron 720m
... that'll be okay with the latest 10.10 version, right?

Thanks,

Ben
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Gizmag: Firesheep session hijacking tool

2010-11-03 Thread Ben Barrett
We could use a private SSL proxy of sorts, no?

That is, employing the same sort of man-in-the-middle tools, a web proxy but
connecting to us via https.
Does anyone reading along know if such a thing exists, or if existing SSL
proxies can handle this?
Sorry, I haven't been keeping up on proxies lately.  I noticed
http://proxy.org/ssl_proxies.shtml and it doesn't seem sensible to go
trusting any unknown proxies out there... tips or experience?  It looks like
it would be a great journalistic expose to create some soc-net accounts and
try to track how those accounts are accessed and abused and so forth...  :)

Back to the block:  One could also use OpenVPN or similar VPN to route
their web traffic through to a more secure uplink, right?

The difficulties of open-access wifi are well-known, but I do find it
interesting to see new adaptions of existing vectors:  a firefox plugin, go
figure!!

ciao


On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:35 AM, abr...@peak.org wrote:

 The block?  If I understand the description correctly there
 are only a few ways to avoid the exploit.
 - Don't use WiFi where a hostile entity can listen.
 - Block all cookies, preventing you from using the sites
  which use cookies to identify you and which don't use SSL.
 - Don't visit those same sites.
 - Force those sites to use SSL.  Of course if they don't
  support it, this fails.

 None of these solutions reliably give you the capability to
 visit social media sites from public WiFi.  What block do
 you refer to?

 Oh, wait.  There is another way.  You could VNC back to
 your home network and visit the social media site indirectly
 from there.  This way you have encryption at the vulnerable
 part of the connection.  Downsides: more complex and slower.
 --
 Allen Brown  
 http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/%7Eabrown/
  Familiarity breeds contempt - and children. --- Mark Twain


 - Original Message -
 From: Lorraine Kerwood lorra...@nextsteprecycling.org
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 12:24:18 AM
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Gizmag: Firesheep session hijacking tool

 Got the block from EFF.


  From: Allen Brown abr...@peak.org
  Organization: Rex Kinetic Sculpture Team
  Reply-To: abr...@peak.org, Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group
  euglug@euglug.org
  Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:58:23 -0700
  To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
  Subject: [Eug-lug] Gizmag: Firesheep session hijacking tool
 
  Exploiting a security hole in many social networking sites
  http://www.gizmag.com/firesheep-http-hijacking-tool/16726/
  --
  Allen Brown
  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/%7Eabrown/

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Gizmag: Firesheep session hijacking tool

2010-11-03 Thread Ben Barrett
And for bonus points, tunnel SSL over DNS where possible :p


On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Alan eug...@thebucks.net wrote:

 On 11/03/2010 03:10 PM, Allen Brown wrote:


 Good point.  Of course this suffers from the same weaknesses as
 VNC.  It just suffers less.


 I suppose.

 I routinely tunnel all of my traffic at public internet access points
 anyway, so for me it isn't sort of hardship.

 -ajb

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] DVD, Region Code 2, 5.8 GiB, 2 Layers -- HowTo ?

2010-10-25 Thread Ben Barrett
package: libdvdread4 ?

re:  https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RestrictedFormats/PlayingDVDs

another source mentioned adding plf to your sources...
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=368415

Should be do-able, I think!  a nifty perl-gui called dvd::rip might help
too:  http://www.exit1.org/dvdrip/

cheers,

Ben


On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Horst knoblauch137-0...@yahoo.com wrote:

 I got a European movie on DVD I am unable to play or even copy. The DVD is
 new, and no wear visible.

 The only app I got to play some broken, pixelated scenes is SMPlayer.
 I can't even copy some of the files from the command line (see below).
 Trying to copy those files from an XP box is rejected with some
 'encryption' msg (I forgot exact wording)

 Some key parameters :
   Region Code 2, PAL, 5.8 GiB, 2 Layers
 For full K3b media info see below.

 So I guess, I need apps that remove the region code (either for copying, or
 in DVD firmware?), then lossy compress the 5.8 GB into something that fits
 on a regular DVD, but not sure about the 2 Layers issue?
 PAL should be a non-issue on PC/3y old hardware, right?

 When I search the web, solutions seem plentiful, but murky. Murky in that
 it's not really clear or clean what they want me to install on my box
 (kubuntu 9.10).
 Anything from official Ubuntu repository?

 Any ideas, other than buying a region code 0 player? Horst

 === cmd line (some numbers set to 111 )===
 VIDEO_TS$ ll VTS_01_0*
 -r--r--r-- 1 4294967111 4294967111 77821 2010-07-02 01:33 VTS_01_0.IFO
 -r--r--r-- 1 4294967111 4294967111 77821 2010-07-02 01:33 VTS_01_0.BUP
 -r--r--r-- 1 4294967111 4294967111 140185111 2010-07-02 01:33 VTS_01_0.VOB

 VIDEO_TS$ cp VTS_01_0* ~/Desktop/DVD_tmp/
 cp: reading `VTS_01_0.VOB': Input/output error

 VIDEO_TS$ file VTS_01_0.VOB
 VTS_01_0.VOB: ERROR: cannot read `VTS_01_0.VOB' (Input/output error)
 VIDEO_TS$

  K3b (some info x'ed out) ==
 Type:DVD-ROM
 Media ID:unknown
 Capacity:676:43:xx min (5.8 GiB)
 Used Capacity:676:43:xx min (5.8 GiB)
 Rewritable:no
 Appendable:no
 Empty:no
 Layers:2
 Sessions:1
 ISO9660 Filesystem Info

 System Id:-
 Volume Id:
 Volume Set Id:UNDEFINED
 Publisher Id:-
 Preparer Id:-
 Application Id:-
 Volume Size:5.8 GiB (2,048 B * 3,045,24x blocks = 6,236,665,xxx B)
 Tracks

 TypeAttributesFirst-Last SectorLength
 1(Data)no copy/uninterrupted0 - 30452463045247 (676:43:xx)
 


 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] [ITPRO-ANNOUNCE] May 18th -- Quentin Hartman, An Introduction to Lua

2010-05-17 Thread Ben Barrett
Anyone up for minor and related discussion on-list (IT Pro Forum or
euglug),
since I won't be able to make this talk (or other 2nd-tuesday eves in
general)... ?

I am about to do my first arduino projects, and while my ears perked up at
this announcement's mention of embedded device scripting, Lua's requirements
appear beyond the scope of the arduino platform:

http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2008-10/msg00420.html

To address my initial goals, I have a variety of arduino goals in mind and
would like to ensure that I find and use the most flexible and capable
software for it, and am hoping to eventually interface some other software
toolchains like JACK (the multimedia daemon).  Feedback [sic] ?

Thanks for doing this and other talks, Hal  Quentin  others!

Ben


On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Hal Pomeranz h...@deer-run.com wrote:

 [Looking forward to this talk...]

 An Introduction to Lua, Quentin Hartman
 6:30pm Tuesday, May 18th
 Eugene City Brewery (downstairs)

 Lua has become the choice for lightweight scripting systems embedded
 within applications as well as devices. Learn about Lua's design,
 where it has been used, and ways you might want to incorporate it into
 your own projects.
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] [ITPRO-ANNOUNCE] May 18th -- Quentin Hartman, An Introduction to Lua

2010-05-17 Thread Ben Barrett
Well at least for the list archive, eLua's newer user labs wiki lists some
of the nice boards and dev kits which *are* supported:

http://wiki.eluaproject.net/Boards

Nice stuff!

cheerio,

Ben

PS - FWIW, eLuaMIDI is great news for some of my project goals, and I will
be considering a more powerful platform with this
http://wiki.eluaproject.net/eLuaMIDI
other embedded-Lua project examples at http://wiki.eluaproject.net/Projects


On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.comwrote:

 Anyone up for minor and related discussion on-list (IT Pro Forum or
 euglug),
 since I won't be able to make this talk (or other 2nd-tuesday eves in
 general)... ?

 I am about to do my first arduino projects, and while my ears perked up at
 this announcement's mention of embedded device scripting, Lua's requirements
 appear beyond the scope of the arduino platform:

 http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2008-10/msg00420.html

 To address my initial goals, I have a variety of arduino goals in mind and
 would like to ensure that I find and use the most flexible and capable
 software for it, and am hoping to eventually interface some other software
 toolchains like JACK (the multimedia daemon).  Feedback [sic] ?

 Thanks for doing this and other talks, Hal  Quentin  others!

 Ben


 On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Hal Pomeranz h...@deer-run.com wrote:

 [Looking forward to this talk...]

 An Introduction to Lua, Quentin Hartman
 6:30pm Tuesday, May 18th
 Eugene City Brewery (downstairs)

 Lua has become the choice for lightweight scripting systems embedded
 within applications as well as devices. Learn about Lua's design,
 where it has been used, and ways you might want to incorporate it into
 your own projects.
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug



___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: local domain host

2010-04-30 Thread Ben Barrett
Are you in fact looking for a physically local server or hosting service?
... or just on the hunt for your own personal localhost [sic] ? :)

If you want the cheap-cheap, either make a friend who has servers and
arrange for them to owe you a favor, or go with the Amazon service or a
similar cheap run-of-the-mill webhost.  If you're asking which cheap/low-end
virtual-hosting services we've had good or bad luck with, I'm sure there is
a whole thread or two in the archives you might enjoy.

Do you need FTP, or just to host some pages which you could copy-and-paste?
You might consider Google Pages or even Google Sites.  They offer lots for
free, and you get some extra services when you pay (I think $50/yr),
including postini and more, plus support ;)

Ben


On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:56 PM, R. Bryan Kane r.bryan.k...@gmail.comwrote:

 A cheap one I like (though not super speedy for something memory-heavy like
 Drupal) is www.NearlyFreeSpeech.net. I like their billing model:
 pay-only-for-what-you-use.

 Bryan





 On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Alan Crandall alan...@comcast.net
 wrote:
  I am thinking about starting a business and will need a good local
 domain
  host
  any suggestions ?
  thanks !
 
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 




 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] local domain hosts

2010-04-26 Thread Ben Barrett
By local, do you mean to have physical access to the server, or do you mean
to have it on high availability to your business location?  Is this for a
simple website or a barrel-full of services?  If you need support staff and
a professional environment, you options are fairly limited, but if you're
just looking for rackspace + bandwidth I'm sure you can find more options if
you poke around.
W.net still handles yournix AFAIK, and you might ask around the IT Pro Forum
and Modern WebDev Group also, or even put something up on the bulletin board
in Deschutes Bldg on UO, or in other sciences there.  Is Corvallis too far?
I think there are numerous options around, on the small scale, which would
probably offer less staffing less and environmental assurances, but which
might serve well Hal?

Possibly your planned expenditure on the server would define that for you :)

Ben


On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Alan Crandall alan...@comcast.net wrote:

 I am thinking about starting a business and will need a good local domain
 host
 any suggestions ?
 thanks !

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] netbook + WoW

2009-12-28 Thread Ben Barrett
Wow, dual-core N330, 8GB max RAM, and Ion graphics.  Is this the first
netbook with such specs?
I've been waiting to see dual-core portable atoms...

As to WoW, it would of course be *much* crappier than any C2D-class machine,
right??
(although it might approach playable, relative to older netbooks)  IANAW
(wow'er)...

Ben


On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Michael Miller
mike.mikemil...@gmail.comwrote:

 ASUS just released a new Eee PC (Seashell 1201N) it has a 12.1 screen.


 http://www.amazon.com/Seashell-1201N-PU17-BK-12-1-Inch-Black-Netbook/dp/B002ZLOR56/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8s=electronicsqid=1262017829sr=8-1

 I would think he would be able to play WOW.   He might try to hook up
 the HDMI to a 46 LCD TV after being frustrated with the small screen
 size.

 -Miller

 On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:45 AM, James Kaplan kg7fu97...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  My 14 yo son is interested to know facts  experiences using netbooks
 with
  World of Warcraft.
 
  --Kaplan
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] netbook + WoW

2009-12-28 Thread Ben Barrett
Have you used or compared the NVidia Ion chipset in particular??  (I have
not done so in detail, but it sounds like a far cry from the prior crap)

On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, erock23...@aol.com wrote:

  How about forgo the hardware limitations and buy a laptop? For the same
 amount of money you'll shell-out for a netbook capable of rendering WoW,
 you'd be able to buy a laptop far superior in specs (bigger hd, more ram,
 better video capabilities, more viewable space, and an optical drive). Now
 if we were talking about a $200 netbook capable of playing WoW worth a
 damn, I would say go for it. Unfortunately, I have only this to say about
 netbooks... the technology isn't there yet.

 -E


  -Original Message-
 From: Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Sent: Mon, Dec 28, 2009 11:19 am
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] netbook + WoW

  Wow, dual-core N330, 8GB max RAM, and Ion graphics.  Is this the first
 netbook with such specs?
 I've been waiting to see dual-core portable atoms...

 As to WoW, it would of course be *much* crappier than any C2D-class
 machine, right??
 (although it might approach playable, relative to older netbooks)  IANAW
 (wow'er)...

 Ben


 On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Michael Miller mike.mikemil...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 ASUS just released a new Eee PC (Seashell 1201N) it has a 12.1 screen.


 http://www.amazon.com/Seashell-1201N-PU17-BK-12-1-Inch-Black-Netbook/dp/B002ZLOR56/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8s=electronicsqid=1262017829sr=8-1

 I would think he would be able to play WOW.   He might try to hook up
 the HDMI to a 46 LCD TV after being frustrated with the small screen
 size.

 -Miller

 On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:45 AM, James Kaplan kg7fu97...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  My 14 yo son is interested to know facts  experiences using netbooks
 with
  World of Warcraft.
 
  --Kaplan
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


  ___

 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] netbook + WoW

2009-12-28 Thread Ben Barrett
Here's WoW on an Acer Aspire One A150, over a year old tho:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOWjfAHoxbI
another similar:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWqZGnrc8Zs

forum discussion:
http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=12065198772sid=1

I have not come across anything Ion-specific though but in the forum
some folks claim framerates of 10fps, which seems pretty unusable (HCI
standards I learned in college suggest we need machine responses in less
than 1/10 second to be happy) but than a second gig of RAM made
playability much better (for the earlier generations of netbooks).  So with
Ion graphics and 2GB RAM, I suspect that basic playability would be good
(except that many wow'ers have high standards, so ymmv!).

It's pretty well-known that you can get a lot more horsepower in the
$300-$500 lapto-not-netbook range... any other reasons, than being on the
cheap, why you want a netbook in particular?  So the kids' poor little back
doesn't give out hauling the thing around??  :)

ciao,

Ben




On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com wrote:

 Have you used or compared the NVidia Ion chipset in particular??  (I have
 not done so in detail, but it sounds like a far cry from the prior crap)


 On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, erock23...@aol.com wrote:

  How about forgo the hardware limitations and buy a laptop? For the same
 amount of money you'll shell-out for a netbook capable of rendering WoW,
 you'd be able to buy a laptop far superior in specs (bigger hd, more ram,
 better video capabilities, more viewable space, and an optical drive). Now
 if we were talking about a $200 netbook capable of playing WoW worth a
 damn, I would say go for it. Unfortunately, I have only this to say about
 netbooks... the technology isn't there yet.

 -E


  -Original Message-
 From: Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Sent: Mon, Dec 28, 2009 11:19 am
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] netbook + WoW

  Wow, dual-core N330, 8GB max RAM, and Ion graphics.  Is this the first
 netbook with such specs?
 I've been waiting to see dual-core portable atoms...

 As to WoW, it would of course be *much* crappier than any C2D-class
 machine, right??
 (although it might approach playable, relative to older netbooks)  IANAW
 (wow'er)...

 Ben


 On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Michael Miller 
 mike.mikemil...@gmail.com wrote:

 ASUS just released a new Eee PC (Seashell 1201N) it has a 12.1 screen.


 http://www.amazon.com/Seashell-1201N-PU17-BK-12-1-Inch-Black-Netbook/dp/B002ZLOR56/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8s=electronicsqid=1262017829sr=8-1

 I would think he would be able to play WOW.   He might try to hook up
 the HDMI to a 46 LCD TV after being frustrated with the small screen
 size.

 -Miller

 On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:45 AM, James Kaplan kg7fu97...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  My 14 yo son is interested to know facts  experiences using netbooks
 with
  World of Warcraft.
 
  --Kaplan
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


  ___

 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug



___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] netbook + WoW

2009-12-28 Thread Ben Barrett
Sure, but it is sold out =P  You can get a real C2D-class machine (not just
Pentium) for about the same on sale, just search around.
BUT, again, even though I expect a 14-yr-old boy is not petite, how do you
amortize the costs of lugging around a 6-pound machine...??

Also!  While the machine you posted is 64-bit, it does *not* support
hardware-assisted virtualization, which I'm pretty sure the N330 Atom
does(!).  This can be an issue... watch out for such details as comparable
machines without those limitations can be found.  I've noticed that not many
netbooks come loaded with much RAM, while many of the lower-end laptops now
do...
so... OP asked about WoW, I may be getting off-topic a bit :)  But these
things may affect the potential resale value, or repurposing potential of a
machine a couple-few years down the road.

Ben


On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:07 PM, erock23...@aol.com wrote:

  No I have not but here is an ASUS laptop with more ram, a faster
 processor, more viewable space, a bigger hard drive, an optical drive, and
 all for the same amount of money.
 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834220663


  -Original Message-
 From: Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Sent: Mon, Dec 28, 2009 11:39 am
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] netbook + WoW

  Have you used or compared the NVidia Ion chipset in particular??  (I have
 not done so in detail, but it sounds like a far cry from the prior crap)

 On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:35 PM, erock23...@aol.com wrote:

  How about forgo the hardware limitations and buy a laptop? For the same
 amount of money you'll shell-out for a netbook capable of rendering WoW,
 you'd be able to buy a laptop far superior in specs (bigger hd, more ram,
 better video capabilities, more viewable space, and an optical drive). Now
 if we were talking about a $200 netbook capable of playing WoW worth a
 damn, I would say go for it. Unfortunately, I have only this to say about
 netbooks... the technology isn't there yet.

 -E


  -Original Message-
 From: Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
  Sent: Mon, Dec 28, 2009 11:19 am
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] netbook + WoW

Wow, dual-core N330, 8GB max RAM, and Ion graphics.  Is this the first
 netbook with such specs?
 I've been waiting to see dual-core portable atoms...

 As to WoW, it would of course be *much* crappier than any C2D-class
 machine, right??
 (although it might approach playable, relative to older netbooks)  IANAW
 (wow'er)...

 Ben


 On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Michael Miller 
 mike.mikemil...@gmail.com wrote:

 ASUS just released a new Eee PC (Seashell 1201N) it has a 12.1 screen.


 http://www.amazon.com/Seashell-1201N-PU17-BK-12-1-Inch-Black-Netbook/dp/B002ZLOR56/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8s=electronicsqid=1262017829sr=8-1

 I would think he would be able to play WOW.   He might try to hook up
 the HDMI to a 46 LCD TV after being frustrated with the small screen
 size.

 -Miller

 On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:45 AM, James Kaplan kg7fu97...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  My 14 yo son is interested to know facts  experiences using netbooks
 with
  World of Warcraft.
 
  --Kaplan
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


  ___


 EUGLUG mailing list

 euglug@euglug.org

 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


  ___

 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] netbook + WoW

2009-12-28 Thread Ben Barrett
Wow, really?  That's not cool at all.  It is very hard to take to a friend's
house.  I agree on the reasons presented, including Alan's of course, but
that is just NOT cool for a 14 year old, I'm afraid.  I can't imagine a
tower seeming like anything more than an anchor.
If I may take James on his word, possibly disposable is a stated goal.
Play along, here, huh??
Can any of you imagine how disappointed you'd be, if already shopping for a
cool small portable, then some wise old fart decides a bulky box is
better?  How is that better.  Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  I
would not recommend a gift that would not be enjoyed.
But hey, what do I know?  Not much.  I'm wrong a lot, both in thinking and
action.  Just remember, this thread is not trying to find the best
purchasing decision for a library.  It is for a teenager.  Mobile
lifestyle?  Welcome to the NEXT decade, folks.  Sorry to be a downer =P

Ben

PS - OTOH, I actually bought a tower recently, having thought they were
completely outmoded.  But, I haven't taken it anywhere, and it hasn't won me
any cool points... it does compute, it is expandable, and on and on... it
will also take up more room in the landfill, on day, but it will prolly stay
out of the landfill longer.  If there was an ideal computer, it'd probably
be the only computer available.



On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:58 PM, erock23...@aol.com wrote:

  Well in that case, I would say buy a desktop. He'll get way more out of
 the machine, it would be significantly more upgradable, and it drops his
 chances of getting rolled for his netbook down to 0. Without a hardware
 budget, practicality and safety of one's hardware become way more important
 than it's coolness, and portability.

 -E



  -Original Message-
 From: James Kaplan kg7fu97...@gmail.com
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Sent: Mon, Dec 28, 2009 7:31 pm
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] netbook + WoW

  Indeed. The goal is cheap and possibly disposable..remember we're talking
 about a 14 year old with no hardware budget to call his own.

 erock23...@aol.com wrote:
  How about forgo the hardware limitations and buy a laptop? For the  same
 amount of money you'll shell-out for a netbook capable of  rendering WoW,
 you'd be able to buy a laptop far superior in specs  (bigger hd, more ram,
 better video capabilities, more viewable space,  and an optical drive). Now
 if we were talking about a $200 netbook  capable of playing WoW worth a
 damn, I would say go for it.  Unfortunately, I have only this to say about
 netbooks... the  technology isn't there yet.
 
  -E
 


 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: OpenType .otf Fonts - Rules I learned by asking about Cross-Platform Font Use - THANK FOLKS!

2009-12-21 Thread Ben Barrett
Great summary, Harold, and since we're not a publishing-specific group, can
you explain what qualifies as serious publishing?
Are you talking about color separations, file formats beyond postscript, or
what?  :)

Thanks much, filing this one for the record!

Ben


On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Harald Sundt h_su...@efn.org wrote:

 Rules I learned by asking about Cross-Platform Font Use - THANK FOLKS!


 • You can check each font in Font Book. Highlight a font and hit command-i.
 This will display info on the font.

 • never mix TT and Type 1 fonts

 • All are” cross platform, except scripts like Arabic and Hindi, where
 Windows and Mac use different rendering technologies.

 • True Type - Looks good on OS X and Windows.

 • Never mix TT and Type 1 fonts - the math can cause imagesetters to go
 into cardiac arrest.

 • If not designed for Clear Type on Windows may be a bit blocky when Clear
 Type is turned on.

 • Virtually all the decent OTF fonts are exorbitant, and companies are
 reluctant to design for OTF

 • OpenOffice.org is pretty much a typesetting disaster to begin with.

 • You can't do serious publishing with Open Office or Neo-Office - you need
 Quark or InDesign (you'll get a bunch of Open Type fonts if you buy InDesign
 anyway; I'm not sure about Quark). You can get away with Illustrator and/or
 Photoshop.

 • If you are doing serious publishing - stick to your Mac - even an old
 Mac.
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: OpenType .otf Fonts - Rules I learned by asking about Cross-Platform Font Use - THANK FOLKS!

2009-12-21 Thread Ben Barrett
[OT oops :]
Google it, http://webspace.webring.com/people/gj/jlinwood/quaterma.htm
only one hit on the quoted quote... you'll get lucky.  ;)

Does this pertain to Avatar??? (the new movie)


On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Harald Sundt h_su...@efn.org wrote:

 On 12/21/09 5:06 PM, Allen Brown wrote:

 Now hold on there a second.  You can't drop a quote like that into
 your sig without saying who the quote comes from!



 quote: Dr. Bernard Quatermass of the The British Experimental Rocket Group
 The BBC TV serial miniseries version of Quatermass and the Pit 1957.




 --
 “the ancient destructive urges in, us, that grow more deadly as our
 populations approach in size and complexity those of ancient Mars. Every war
 crisis, witch-hunt, race riot and purge…is a reminder and warning. We are
 the Martians. If we cannot control the inheritance within us…this will be
 their second dead planet!”

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: OpenType .otf Fonts - Rules I learned by asking about Cross-Platform Font Use - THANK FOLKS!

2009-12-21 Thread Ben Barrett
Thanks Paul, I again had the serious impression that some industry snobbery
(er, self-interest) might be generating that phrase serious publishing.
Hopefully most of you can remember the days before Linux or other FOSS was
used:
to make a blockbuster movie
to run a mainstream cellphone or handheld
in the firmware of many embedded devices
...and so forth.
So, to be clear, the phrase or intent of the word serious in particular (in
pejorative context) indicates impending extinction of the speaker, or their
attitude anyway, if we're aware of free market competition and also believe
that there will be a tomorrow.

Harold, I thought you wrote that... still good info, and currently still
true if you want to bring a project into *most* commercial print shops (or
else you'd be paying them to convert it from your format since that's prolly
all they know how to handle directly very well).  Hope I'm not butting in
too much on this topic, I am personally more interested in typesetting as it
relates to CNC; print is dead.  Mwa haw haw...

:)
   Ben



On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:31 PM, marbux mar...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Harald Sundt h_su...@efn.org wrote:
  Rules I learned by asking about Cross-Platform Font Use - THANK FOLKS!

  • You can't do serious publishing with Open Office or Neo-Office - you
 need
  Quark or InDesign (you'll get a bunch of Open Type fonts if you buy
 InDesign
  anyway; I'm not sure about Quark). You can get away with Illustrator
 and/or
  Photoshop.

 I was a typographer for some 20 years before switching careers to
 practice law. Never lost my interest. In choosing publishing software,
 much depends on  the kind and quality of publications you're aimed at
 presenting. Regardless of the software chosen, there's a learning
 curve.

 Some more alternatives you might check.

 -- WordPerfect X4. Much better typesetting quality than OOo or Word,
 although still not as powerful for typography as a full blown DTP
 system. But comes with an excellent collection of ~ 1,000 high quality
 fonts, both in Type I and TTF. Windows only. Can be obtained on eBay
 for around $35. More than worth it it for the fonts alone. Generally
 makes an excellent text input program for a DTP.

 -- Scribus. The premier free DTP for Linux/Unix. Not yet in the class
 of Adobe and Quark's high end offerings, but rather startlingly
 powerful. http://www.scribus.net/. And if you've got  the need for
 the high end proprietary offerings, you've got the money to hire 20
 people to run the software. Should be in MacPorts and there is a
 Windows port as well.

 -- LaTeX. Desktop typesetting systems don't come more powerful than
 TeX and LaTex is its most popular incarnation.
 http://www.latex-project.org/. Excellent for  journal articles,
 technical reports, books, and slide presentations, particularly
 because you can wrestle with the typography at the markup level. Old
 and mature. Requires PostScript fonts. Free, supported on
 Linux/Unix/OS X/Windows.

  -- The Gimp (Gnu Image Manipulation Program). Professional grade open
 source image manipulation tools.  http://www.gimp.org/. Free,
 supported on Linux/Unix/OS X/Windows.

 -- Inkscape. Excellent SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) editor.
 http://www.inkscape.org/. SVG images are quickly becoming
 mission-critical in web publishing because of the mobile device
 onslaught and the need to scale images for a wider variety of screen
 resolutions and sizes. Free, supported on Linux/Unix/OS X/Windows.

 -- ImageMagick. Professional-grade raster (bitmap) image editor.
 http://www.imagemagick.org/. Notably, can output more than 100
 raster formats. Command line tools, but GUIs for them are available.
 Free, supported on Linux/Unix/OS X/Windows.

 There are still more related open source projects. Bottom line though:
 If you want to walk into someone else's shop and work for them, you'll
 probably need to be competent with the Adobe or Quark DTP offerings.
 But if you are setting up your own shop, I'd take a very hard look at
 what the free and open source software community has to offer.

 The proprietary software industry depends on forcing you to upgrade
 periodically. That's inevitable with revenues derived from license
 sales. Adobe and Quark's software is very expensive and not just for
 the initial purchase. It's an ongoing expense, not only for the
 license acquisition cost but also for the productivity hit in the
 learning curve for upgraded versions.

 It's been many years since I dropped my partnership in a couple of
 print shops and switched careers. But if I were setting up a
 typesetting service today, it would take a real show-stopper to
 persuade me to go the proprietary software route.

 YMMV.

 Best regards,

 Paul


 --
 Universal Interoperability Council
 http:www.universal-interop-council.org
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Codec?

2009-12-21 Thread Ben Barrett
It is using Flash (I can see it with Flash 9), but it loads some BimVid
4.2.6 player within that,
which could have platform- or browser-dependent coding in it I suppose...
I did not tear it apart, but just right-clicked on the video.
We might have to know more about what you have (or what does work),
to figure out what is missing tho...

Ben

PS - LOL, looks like BimVid means it was encoded using Linux!
http://www.forbidden.co.uk/solutions/repurposing/



On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Wes Morgan morg...@efn.org wrote:

 Can someone tell me what I am missing that I cannot get video's to play on
 this web site?

 Wes



 http://www.kgw.com/news/Three-children-hit-by-car-in-Tualatin-crosswalk-79818067.html
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: OpenType .otf Fonts - Rules I learned by asking about Cross-Platform Font Use - THANK FOLKS!

2009-12-21 Thread Ben Barrett
No offense, Alan, of course this was between the lines of your question :)
Sigh, in this age of remixing/freemixing... change a few words, add a break
beat, and voilà!
What do you think about some sort of hyper-intelligent copy-paste code which
acts like big brother for this issue?
My hardest censorship lesson was to leave ads in place when I had the option
to filter them out for a largish private party... well the bandwidth was
provided by an EFF founder, I got the smack-down and learned an important
lesson!  =O
You might just get what you ask for, but you may have to ask for it.  -B.
Barrett, 2009
(oddly, when I google that to make sure no-one else had the same words, I
get an Eric Raymond doc, lol)


On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Allen Brown abr...@peak.org wrote:

 Yes, I figured I could track it down with google.  But I would
 never quote something like that without giving attribution.
 Everybody should be giving credit when borrowing somebody's
 lines.  This is not the responsibility of the reader.
 Think copyright.
 --
 Allen Brown  abrown at peak.org  
 http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/%7Eabrown/
  If people sat outside and looked at the stars each night,
  I'll bet they'd live a lot differently. --- Bill Watterson

  [OT oops :]
  Google it, http://webspace.webring.com/people/gj/jlinwood/quaterma.htm
  only one hit on the quoted quote... you'll get lucky.  ;)
 
  Does this pertain to Avatar??? (the new movie)
 
 
  On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Harald Sundt h_su...@efn.org wrote:
 
  On 12/21/09 5:06 PM, Allen Brown wrote:
 
  Now hold on there a second.  You can't drop a quote like that into
  your sig without saying who the quote comes from!
 
 
 
  quote: Dr. Bernard Quatermass of the The British Experimental Rocket
  Group
  The BBC TV serial miniseries version of Quatermass and the Pit 1957.
 
 
 
 
  --
  “the ancient destructive urges in, us, that grow more deadly as our
  populations approach in size and complexity those of ancient Mars. Every
  war
  crisis, witch-hunt, race riot and purge…is a reminder and warning. We
  are
  the Martians. If we cannot control the inheritance within us…this will
  be
  their second dead planet!”
 
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 




 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: OpenType .otf Fonts - Rules I learned by asking about Cross-Platform Font Use - THANK FOLKS!

2009-12-21 Thread Ben Barrett
Great perspective!  I think the proprietary realm is in great part moving
toward the service-oriented model to keep up... maybe as a last gulp of air
for most of them, since Google has rocking free services (and IMO does make
their pay services worthwhile where applicable).  To be clear, Google Apps
are to be considered proprietary also, since I cannot seem to deploy them on
my own server... and any application-service provider seems to need to
provide some amount of interaction API's to keep pace with web
2.0^D^D^D3.14159...
I do think licensing software will be around for a long time though, on the
high-end.

Ben


On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:07 PM, marbux mar...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Thanks Paul, I again had the serious impression that some industry
 snobbery
  (er, self-interest) might be generating that phrase serious publishing.

 There's a human tendency to think that the way things are done now is
 how things will be done in the future. I'll never forget a passage in
 the International Typographical Union's 1952 edition of Lessons in
 Printing, a seven-volume set of lessons that had to be completed by
 all apprentices. The introduction to first volume, Lessons in Trade
 Unionism, extolled the benefits of becoming a typographer. One of the
 claimed benefits was that the typography trade would never be
 obsoleted because human languages were too complex to be susceptible
 to automation.

 Thirty years later, the ITU --- at the time the oldest trade union in
 the U.S. --- dissolved because its membership had plummeted, almost
 entirely attributable to automation. Most of its remaining membership
 folded into the Communications Workers of America, a union with a
 focus on digital information.

 Which was but the latest chapter in a long history of word processing
 technological change dating to the birth of symbolism itself in
 pre-history.

 I see in some ways a similar technological revolution evolving with
 software business models. The proprietary software business model is
 in decline, in no small part because it has a fundamental conflict
 with the easy and inexpensive copying and dissemination of bits. Free
 and open source software business models that embrace that fundamental
 trait of bits are on the rise.

 Lots of people out there still stuck on proprietary software who
 haven't noticed that the earth is moving beneath their desktops. :-)

 Best regards,

 Paul


 --
 Universal Interoperability Council
 http:www.universal-interop-council.org
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: OpenType .otf Fonts - Rules I learned by asking about Cross-Platform Font Use - THANK FOLKS!

2009-12-21 Thread Ben Barrett
It was burning man... I thought they would... but in that instance,
censorship was a no-no.
At the time, I didn't think of it as censorship — I thought it was helpful
=/
As for TV, Hulu.com offers most shows with far fewer commercials than TV,
oddly even many premium channel's shows.

Thanks :)  I was deeply surprised, almost disturbed, that word-wise, I'm as
__ (annoying?!) as ESR.

Ben



On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Allen Brown abr...@peak.org wrote:

 Did the largish private party want this?  I certainly would!
 I stopped watching TV because of too many ads... in the 60s!
 It's gotten hugely worse since then from what I've heard.

 BTW the quote you provided I would never complain about.
 It is the sort of quote which has probably been invented
 afresh thousands of times.
 --
 Allen Brown  
 http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/%7Eabrown/
  If you're in trouble, or hurt or need - go to the poor people. They're
  the only ones that'll help - the only ones. --- John Steinbeck

  No offense, Alan, of course this was between the lines of your question
 :)
  Sigh, in this age of remixing/freemixing... change a few words, add a
  break
  beat, and voilà!
  What do you think about some sort of hyper-intelligent copy-paste code
  which acts like big brother for this issue?
  My hardest censorship lesson was to leave ads in place when I had the
  option
  to filter them out for a largish private party... well the bandwidth was
  provided by an EFF founder, I got the smack-down and learned an important
  lesson!  =O
  You might just get what you ask for, but you may have to ask for it.
  -B.
  Barrett, 2009
  (oddly, when I google that to make sure no-one else had the same words, I
  get an Eric Raymond doc, lol)
 
 
  On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Allen Brown abr...@peak.org wrote:
 
  Yes, I figured I could track it down with google.  But I would
  never quote something like that without giving attribution.
  Everybody should be giving credit when borrowing somebody's
  lines.  This is not the responsibility of the reader.
  Think copyright.
  --
  Allen Brown  abrown at peak.org
  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/%7Eabrown/
 http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/%7Eabrown/
   If people sat outside and looked at the stars each night,
   I'll bet they'd live a lot differently. --- Bill Watterson
 
   [OT oops :]
   Google it,
 http://webspace.webring.com/people/gj/jlinwood/quaterma.htm
   only one hit on the quoted quote... you'll get lucky.  ;)
  
   Does this pertain to Avatar??? (the new movie)
  
  
   On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Harald Sundt h_su...@efn.org
 wrote:
  
   On 12/21/09 5:06 PM, Allen Brown wrote:
  
   Now hold on there a second.  You can't drop a quote like that into
   your sig without saying who the quote comes from!
  
  
  
   quote: Dr. Bernard Quatermass of the The British Experimental Rocket
   Group
   The BBC TV serial miniseries version of Quatermass and the Pit
  1957.
  
  
  
  
   --
   “the ancient destructive urges in, us, that grow more deadly as our
   populations approach in size and complexity those of ancient Mars.
  Every
   war
   crisis, witch-hunt, race riot and purge…is a reminder and warning. We
   are
   the Martians. If we cannot control the inheritance within us…this
  will
   be
   their second dead planet!”
  
   ___
   EUGLUG mailing list
   euglug@euglug.org
   http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
  
   ___
   EUGLUG mailing list
   euglug@euglug.org
   http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
  
 
 
 
 
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 




 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] OpenType .otf fonts: I use Open Office on my Linux and Windows Xp partitions on my laptop and Neo Office on my Mac

2009-12-19 Thread Ben Barrett
Warning lights go off whenever I hear, that is the *only* technology for
serious XYZ'ing...
sounds like you've talked to someone who is zealous or has industry-placed
blinders, or maybe both :)
Granted, I'm no font expert, so it is easy for me to make such claims =P
However, on my Mac, .ttf files are recognized as Windows fonts, LOL!

Ben

PS - The font suitcase is what most of my OS X fonts are packaged as, FWIW.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrueType also, if you have not already;
and...
you may like http://fontforge.sourceforge.net/ ;)


On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 4:16 PM, marbux mar...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Harald Sundt h_su...@efn.org wrote:
  OpenType  .otf  fonts: I use Open Office on my Linux and Windows Xp
  partitions on my laptop and Neo Office on my Mac
 
  I am thinking about tracking down OpenType fonts because they are
  cross-platform and I am told they are the only thing for serious
 publishing.
 
  I take it my Mac is full of Apple's TrueType and Adobe's Type 1 fonts.
 
  Should I track down the meat and potatoes fonts in OpenType format?

 OTF is still young technology, having achieved ISO/IEC standardization
 only a couple of years ago. Support for it in applications is spotty
 at best. I suggest investigating whether the specific applications you
 wish to use support its advanced typographical features. (E.g.,
 OpenOffice.org is pretty much a typesetting disaster to begin with.)
 If not, I doubt you'll see any substantial improvement over TTF and
 Type 1. Promising technology, but it will take time for it to be
 widely implemented.

 Wikipedia has a fairly good article about OTF including its state of
 implementation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Type. Probably
 helpful to read before you start work with a search engine.

 Best regards,

 Paul


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] I think I'll go back to Fedora 11...what about Tux on Ice?

2009-12-10 Thread Ben Barrett
If this terminal (gnome-terminal) always renders incorrectly under normal
use, have you tried starting it via sudo or as root?  I am suspicious that
the permissions are incorrect for only some portion of your driver,
somehow... have you launched into X *as* root, and tried to reproduce the
problems under different conditions?

Oddly, my kitchen's cold water is still seized up, but the cold water tap in
the bathroom (further along my plumbing) works fine... and thankfully, hot
works on both.  So I've been trying to keep the hot pipes hot to give some
ambient heat to the frozen pipes... gah.

Regards,

Ben


On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, BB bilbobag...@gmail.com wrote:

 That's right just a white rectangle, anchored to the upper left of the
 desktop for the terminal.  I can see that the mouse cursor changes to a
 text cursor, over the input field, in password the window associated
 with the update manager; that window is center screen on the desktop,
 but I haven't played much with anything, and I'm ready to move back to
 FC 11.  As I said, in another post, removing the nVidia driver doesn't
 fix the problem.

 ...a couple of days without running water and it's back to the stone
 age.  Thankfully the electricity is still on.

 Brian


 On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 15:58 -0800, Ben Barrett wrote:
  And I suspect that you don't get any window-manager handle cues around
  the edge of that blank area, either?
  (and furthermore, that mouse-selecting/highlighting any text typed
  into the terminal does not make it visible?)
 
  Compared to the variety of X oddness I've seen, I am surprised that
  the menu stays visible at the top of it... does that only come above
  the blank region when you activate the screenshot?
  Do you have any window-relocation hotkeys setup?  (some WM configs
  allow a key combination with mouse drag to move a window instead of
  giving it input)  Does that have any effect?
  Interesting... but also fighting some iced-up water lines here.  =/
 
  Ben
 
 
  On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM, BB bilbobag...@gmail.com wrote:
  I include a screenshot.
 
  I note that the window is always anchored to the upper left
  location.  I
  think I'll give up on this and go back to Fedora 11, as I
  said.
 
  Brian
 
 
  On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 16:27 -0800, Michael Miller wrote:
 
 
   Press the print screen key and that should pop up a window
  for you to
   save the image.
  
   On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:15 PM, BB bilbobag...@gmail.com
  wrote:
I might be able to...I'll admit I'm so lame, with linux, I
  don't even
know how...give me till the weekend to sort things out.
   
I'm changing jobs and I don't want to loose focus on the
  big picture.
   
Brian
   
   
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:02 -0800, Michael Miller wrote:
Can you take a screenshot?
   
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:07 PM, BB
  bilbobag...@gmail.com wrote:
 It's not that bad...everything is working in terms of
  the dual displays
 and OpenGL functionality BUT, like I said, open a
  terminal and it's
 window is all white.  It's working, because I can type
  in a command and
 it'll execute; I just can't see what I'm typing.

 There are other little anomalies in opening a window.
   Such as the
 update window puts up a window to ask for your
  password.  That's blank
 also, but I can see the mouse cursor change were the
  password field
 is.

 Like I said, I had this all working under Fedora Core
  11, I just ran
 into the problem of using suspend...that's another
  issue entirely.  I
 don't need to suspend the system, but I would like to
  use dual monitors.

 I've got an another system with an EN8400GS card
  waiting for this issue
 to be resolved.  If FC 11 will do it, so be it...

 Ubuntu has ease of use in a lot of areas.  I was hoping
  to use just one
 distro or the the other.

 Brian


 On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:49 -0800, Ben Barrett wrote:
 Is this related to your woes?  CANTFIX  :(
 http://bugs.gentoo.org/111833

 I wanted to make sure you've come across

 
 http://lunapark6.com/dual-head-configuration-with-different-resolutions-per-screen-linux.html
 or similar google results...
 that is,
  http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-7938.html
 or even
  http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-75149.html

Re: [Eug-lug] I think I'll go back to Fedora 11...what about Tux on Ice?

2009-12-09 Thread Ben Barrett
And I suspect that you don't get any window-manager handle cues around the
edge of that blank area, either?
(and furthermore, that mouse-selecting/highlighting any text typed into the
terminal does not make it visible?)

Compared to the variety of X oddness I've seen, I am surprised that the menu
stays visible at the top of it... does that only come above the blank region
when you activate the screenshot?
Do you have any window-relocation hotkeys setup?  (some WM configs allow a
key combination with mouse drag to move a window instead of giving it
input)  Does that have any effect?
Interesting... but also fighting some iced-up water lines here.  =/

Ben


On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM, BB bilbobag...@gmail.com wrote:

 I include a screenshot.

 I note that the window is always anchored to the upper left location.  I
 think I'll give up on this and go back to Fedora 11, as I said.

 Brian


 On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 16:27 -0800, Michael Miller wrote:
  Press the print screen key and that should pop up a window for you to
  save the image.
 
  On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:15 PM, BB bilbobag...@gmail.com wrote:
   I might be able to...I'll admit I'm so lame, with linux, I don't even
   know how...give me till the weekend to sort things out.
  
   I'm changing jobs and I don't want to loose focus on the big picture.
  
   Brian
  
  
   On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 15:02 -0800, Michael Miller wrote:
   Can you take a screenshot?
  
   On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:07 PM, BB bilbobag...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not that bad...everything is working in terms of the dual
 displays
and OpenGL functionality BUT, like I said, open a terminal and it's
window is all white.  It's working, because I can type in a command
 and
it'll execute; I just can't see what I'm typing.
   
There are other little anomalies in opening a window.  Such as the
update window puts up a window to ask for your password.  That's
 blank
also, but I can see the mouse cursor change were the password field
is.
   
Like I said, I had this all working under Fedora Core 11, I just ran
into the problem of using suspend...that's another issue entirely.
  I
don't need to suspend the system, but I would like to use dual
 monitors.
   
I've got an another system with an EN8400GS card waiting for this
 issue
to be resolved.  If FC 11 will do it, so be it...
   
Ubuntu has ease of use in a lot of areas.  I was hoping to use just
 one
distro or the the other.
   
Brian
   
   
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:49 -0800, Ben Barrett wrote:
Is this related to your woes?  CANTFIX  :(
http://bugs.gentoo.org/111833
   
I wanted to make sure you've come across
   
 http://lunapark6.com/dual-head-configuration-with-different-resolutions-per-screen-linux.html
or similar google results...
that is, http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-7938.html
or even http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-75149.html
(but the glawing .com site they mention does not seem to have the
topic any more)
   
   
   
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:55 AM, BB bilbobag...@gmail.com wrote:
No, I like Ubuntu...I'm going to do a fresh install and see
 if
it's only
the Twinview feature.  maybe I'll epoxy over the VGA so
 I'll
stop
playing with dual monitors.  I don't really need it...like
 the
mountain...it's just there.
   
   
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 11:42 -0800, Ben Barrett wrote:
 No likey Ubuntu?  Sorry, I don't [yet] have access to any
recent
 nvidia dual-display hardware (but actually, expect to
 soon,
under
 ubuntu studio, a 9500gt whee)...

 On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, BB 
 bilbobag...@gmail.com
wrote:
 I got a much more stable nVidia driver experience
 on
Fedora
 11, with the
 official nVidia driver.

 I had it all working under FC 11 then I blew-up
 my
system
 playing with
 suspend / hibernate.

 I read that Tux on Ice allows the user to
 suspend.

 Brian

   
   
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
   
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
   
   
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
   
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http

Re: [Eug-lug] I think I'll go back to Fedora 11...what about Tux on Ice?

2009-12-08 Thread Ben Barrett
No likey Ubuntu?  Sorry, I don't [yet] have access to any recent nvidia
dual-display hardware (but actually, expect to soon, under ubuntu studio, a
9500gt whee)...

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, BB bilbobag...@gmail.com wrote:

 I got a much more stable nVidia driver experience on Fedora 11, with the
 official nVidia driver.

 I had it all working under FC 11 then I blew-up my system playing with
 suspend / hibernate.

 I read that Tux on Ice allows the user to suspend.

 Brian


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] I think I'll go back to Fedora 11...what about Tux on Ice?

2009-12-08 Thread Ben Barrett
Is this related to your woes?  CANTFIX  :(
http://bugs.gentoo.org/111833

I wanted to make sure you've come across
http://lunapark6.com/dual-head-configuration-with-different-resolutions-per-screen-linux.html
or similar google results...
that is, http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-7938.html
or even http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-75149.html
(but the glawing .com site they mention does not seem to have the topic any
more)



On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:55 AM, BB bilbobag...@gmail.com wrote:

 No, I like Ubuntu...I'm going to do a fresh install and see if it's only
 the Twinview feature.  maybe I'll epoxy over the VGA so I'll stop
 playing with dual monitors.  I don't really need it...like the
 mountain...it's just there.

 On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 11:42 -0800, Ben Barrett wrote:
  No likey Ubuntu?  Sorry, I don't [yet] have access to any recent
  nvidia dual-display hardware (but actually, expect to soon, under
  ubuntu studio, a 9500gt whee)...
 
  On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, BB bilbobag...@gmail.com wrote:
  I got a much more stable nVidia driver experience on Fedora
  11, with the
  official nVidia driver.
 
  I had it all working under FC 11 then I blew-up my system
  playing with
  suspend / hibernate.
 
  I read that Tux on Ice allows the user to suspend.
 
  Brian
 
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google Wave

2009-11-12 Thread Ben Barrett
From what I could see, the platform seems capable of a lot but they need a
lot of robots and widgets and such to be written around it.  I like that
current trends are to at least have service API's, although it could get
confusing to normal users if there are a dozen or more audio and video
conferencing widgets all competing for attention, almost like trying to find
the best package for something in Linux/FOSS land :)

The map widget is nice enough, but I want a widget for the live/bing maps,
so I can arrange their birds-eye views next to google street views, etc.
Could be a good platform, tastes a little like a stock drupal  :)  The
config panel for it is a node just like everything is a node or whatever
their paradigm is
which has all its benefits of course, but leaves that aftertaste of
object-oriented-abuse =P

Ben


On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:19 PM, battleshipterry
battleshipte...@gmail.comwrote:



 Also has a strong Facebook smell, with the feature for web blogging. euglug
 works similar with replying to each others emails for all to C.And Wave is
 mobile friendly.I also requested a invite.
 No privacy on the Google cloud though.Maybe they should call it
 Hieroglyph,so when our current race ends.(As did the ancient Egyptians.)
  and future cultures look back they could just  look at the Google cloud to
 learn all about Us. Creepy  :{ Bet they have a hard time breaking the text
 ting code LOL.




 Jimmy Hendrix wrote:

 Yeah, I got an invite a few days back.  I am still figuring it out,
 but James' description sounds about right.  Only thing I'll add is
 that the shared conversations can be text, audio, images, videos, etc.
  And the conversations don't have to happen in real time, but they can
 too.

 It sounds pretty cool, except I have no clue what I will actually use it
 for.

 On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:22 PM, battleshipterry
 battleshipte...@gmail.com wrote:


 I see Wave is like a live shared message board.Being a fellow ham radio
 operator,it is like, like a net session on ham radio,but on
 internet.Where
 Talk is like a IP phone service.

 James Kaplan wrote:


 can someone send me an invite for google wave?

 thanks


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] OS X FS

2009-10-22 Thread Ben Barrett
As NeoOffice is to OpenOffice, to Seashore is to the Gimp :)
Both are Aqua builds... that is, using the native windowing environment in OS X,
and both having somewhat limited features relative to their fullblown
counterparts.
They both include the most common tools, of course, and run much
faster and more slick this way.
There is also Camino, which is an Aqua browser based on Moz/FF, but
IIRC it does not use XUL and has its own set of plugins.
Among others... check out opensourcemac.org as just one launchpad.
The ports system will probably be what you really want!

Ben


On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Chris LeBlanc leblanc...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have found NeoOffice a great port of OO.org to native OS X.  As with
 others, I have found that once Xcode is installed, you have access to a
 wide variety of tools and ports of Open Source software.

 Chris
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google vaporware announcement

2009-07-08 Thread Ben Barrett
Those are games, huh?  Sorry :)

Well I read the announcement there, and I thought this part was a little
silly:
Obviously, this Chrome OS will be lightweight and fast just like the
browser itself. But also just like the browser, it will be open-sourced.
Think Microsoft will be open-sourcing Windows anytime soon?

Now this makes pertinent discussion for our group, but I think they're
over-playing the open source card.  There are likely to be a lot of parts
which are NOT open source, maybe tucked into browser plugins or kernel
modules.  To make the comparison question here is off-base:  when will
google open-source their search engine algorithms???!
Microsoft would have too much egg on face, and even more abuse while
google would be giving away some of their top science :)

I'm very curious to see what they come up with for a new windowing system.
X windows is even more archaic than well you know.
Also very curious to see how long until VNC can play nicely with their
Chromeishness, and how well it can be remotely tunneled:  Hey I've got
remote Chrome via SSH!  How long until we can hear that?  ;)   Desktop or
per-window, I'm supposing it will play nice with Android too (bookmarks by
bluetooth and call-switching from cell to google voice?).

Sounds fun!

Ben




On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:25 AM, erock23...@aol.com wrote:

  If I can't play Stalker or UT2k4 on it...I don't want it.

 -E


  -Original Message-
 From: marbux mar...@gmail.com
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Sent: Wed, Jul 8, 2009 3:48 am
 Subject: [Eug-lug] Google vaporware announcement

  Interesting vaporware announcement by Google:

 http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/07/google-drops-a-nuclear-bomb-on-microsoft-and-its-made-of-chrome/.



 Wow. So you know all those whispers about a Google desktop operating

 system that never seem to go away? You thought they might with the

 launch of Android, Google’s mobile OS. But they persisted. And for

 good reason, because it’s real.


 In the second half of 2010, Google plans to launch the Google Chrome

 OS, an operating system designed from the ground up to run the Chrome

 web browser on netbooks. “It’s our attempt to re-think what operating

 systems should be,” Google writes tonight on its blog.


 [more]


 Linux kernel, intended for x86 and ARM platforms, open source. Sounds

 like an interesting
  project. Don't miss the link to the Google blog.


 Best regards,


 Paul


 --

 Universal Interoperability Council

 http:www.universal-interop-council.org

 ___

 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


 --
 Finding the best videos just got easier. Try the NEW 
 Truveo.comhttp://www.truveo.com/?ncid=emlweustruv0001
 .

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google vaporware announcement (Doors of Expression flavored ranting)

2009-07-08 Thread Ben Barrett
Thanks for catching me up, Larry =P  I've read a few things and have my own
take on it, most likely.  I'm not signed up to be a Chrome OS dev or support
engineer or anything!

For those proprietary bits, I was thinking more about the fragments of the
web which are harder to access without browser plugins, but also a little
about the kernel module level which seems like a mixed blessing (not my area
of course).  It will be neat to see what sort of location-aware apps can
arise with the combination of a netbook/laptop on chromeos and a phone on
android (or possibly supporting apps for other phone/handheld platforms).

Sounds like you're expecting content creators to make everything public
domain, which sounds dreamy but unrealistic.
As a budding content creator myself, I'm troubled about this on both digital
and analog (er, steel) fronts...
So back to tech, why so much google bashing lately?  The benefits of AI seem
so tongue-in-cheek, lately;
when someone finally hands you a flying car will you go on and enjoy the
ride, or protest it?

So I'm saying that chrome os will make all the netbooks into flying cars or
at least hoverboards, poetically,
and politically, the tools of a tech-powered democrazy [sic] will be in the
peoples' hands more than ever...
because google can deliver linux like it has never been delivered.

So, chromeos is gift horse?  And age-old paradigm.  How do we really want to
deal with this (google), folks?
We sure don't have to agree, but I'm hoping we can support an array of
opinions here :)

Cheerio,

Ben

PS - nobody seems to be ranting about the applied intelligence acting on
your silly little packets before they even get to their destination
anymore.  Knowledge is known for example about social networking activity
before the social networks even have their data, that is, in transit.  The
splinter in our eye?   =P



On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:08 AM, larry price lapr...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Ben Barrettstircrazy...@gmail.com wrote:
  Those are games, huh?  Sorry :)
 
  Well I read the announcement there, and I thought this part was a little
  silly:
  Obviously, this Chrome OS will be lightweight and fast just like the
  browser itself. But also just like the browser, it will be open-sourced.
  Think Microsoft will be open-sourcing Windows anytime soon?
 
  Now this makes pertinent discussion for our group, but I think they're
  over-playing the open source card.  There are likely to be a lot of parts
  which are NOT open source, maybe tucked into browser plugins or kernel
  modules.  To make the comparison question here is off-base:  when will
  google open-source their search engine algorithms???!
  Microsoft would have too much egg on face, and even more abuse while
  google would be giving away some of their top science :)

 Ben, you've got to catch up to the times. The client OS will be open
 source (it's actually gentoo under the hood).
 All the proprietary bits will be hidden in the cloud. Also since this
 is google, they will use proprietary algorithms to examine everything
 you look at to better provide you with... Focused, Relevant,
 Advertising you want to see.

 It doesn't matter if the spoon is open source if the soup is full of
 gooey chunks of proprietary content.

 
  I'm very curious to see what they come up with for a new windowing
 system.
  X windows is even more archaic than well you know.
  Also very curious to see how long until VNC can play nicely with their
  Chromeishness, and how well it can be remotely tunneled:  Hey I've got
  remote Chrome via SSH!  How long until we can hear that?  ;)   Desktop
 or
  per-window, I'm supposing it will play nice with Android too (bookmarks
 by
  bluetooth and call-switching from cell to google voice?).
 

 completely unsubstantiated rumour has it that chromeos will be running
 a framebuffer with a specialized version of XMonad.
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Google vaporware announcement (Doors of Expression flavored ranting)

2009-07-08 Thread Ben Barrett
So let me ask this way:  how can we (if we want to), overcome our gag
reflex at the branding, if indeed there are good and useful tools within?

As activists of appropriate technology, if this contains any of it, we could
discuss the pro's and con's of the contents, beyond the branding.  Google
keeps eating up such a variety of technology companies, there are volumes of
discussion to be had on the synergy they are likely to achieve with what
they've got.  It strikes me a little bit like when CPU's started to be
engineered by other CPU's, instead of by humans.  When capabilities start
growing that fast, everyone has reason to be a bit shifty ;)

Will they in fact, own the desktop at such a point?

ttfn,

Ben


On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 4:45 PM, erock23...@aol.com wrote:


  Indeed Larry. the thought of using a google-made OS, fills me with a
 revulsion I'd only experienced at the thought of having to use a
 Microsoft-made OS back when I was still a mac user.  Google practically
 owns the internet, now they want my desktop too? I don't think so.

 -E

  -Original Message-
 From: Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Sent: Wed, Jul 8, 2009 11:04 am
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Google vaporware announcement (Doors of Expression
 flavored ranting)

  Thanks for catching me up, Larry =P  I've read a few things and have my
 own take on it, most likely.  I'm not signed up to be a Chrome OS dev or
 support engineer or anything!

 For those proprietary bits, I was thinking more about the fragments of the
 web which are harder to access without browser plugins, but also a little
 about the kernel module level which seems like a mixed blessing (not my area
 of course).  It will be neat to see what sort of location-aware apps can
 arise with the combination of a netbook/laptop on chromeos and a phone on
 android (or possibly supporting apps for other phone/handheld platforms).

 Sounds like you're expecting content creators to make everything public
 domain, which sounds dreamy but unrealistic.
 As a budding content creator myself, I'm troubled about this on both
 digital and analog (er, steel) fronts...
 So back to tech, why so much google bashing lately?  The benefits of AI
 seem so tongue-in-cheek, lately;
 when someone finally hands you a flying car will you go on and enjoy the
 ride, or protest it?

 So I'm saying that chrome os will make all the netbooks into flying cars or
 at least hoverboards, poetically,
 and politically, the tools of a tech-powered democrazy [sic] will be in the
 peoples' hands more than ever...
 because google can deliver linux like it has never been delivered.

 So, chromeos is gift horse?  And age-old paradigm.  How do we really want
 to deal with this (google), folks?
 We sure don't have to agree, but I'm hoping we can support an array of
 opinions here :)

 Cheerio,

 Ben

 PS - nobody seems to be ranting about the applied intelligence acting on
 your silly little packets before they even get to their destination
 anymore.  Knowledge is known for example about social networking activity
 before the social networks even have their data, that is, in transit.  The
 splinter in our eye?   =P



 On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:08 AM, larry price lapr...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Ben Barrettstircrazy...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Those are games, huh?  Sorry :)
 
  Well I read the announcement there, and I thought this part was a little
  silly:
  Obviously, this Chrome OS will be lightweight and fast just like the
  browser itself. But also just like the browser, it will be open-sourced.
  Think Microsoft will be open-sourcing Windows anytime soon?
 
  Now this makes pertinent discussion for our group, but I think they're
  over-playing the open source card.  There are likely to be a lot of
 parts
  which are NOT open source, maybe tucked into browser plugins or kernel
  modules.  To make the comparison question here is off-base:  when will
  google open-source their search engine algorithms???!
  Microsoft would have too much egg on face, and even more abuse while
  google would be giving away some of their top science :)

  Ben, you've got to catch up to the times. The client OS will be open
 source (it's actually gentoo under the hood).
 All the proprietary bits will be hidden in the cloud. Also since this
 is google, they will use proprietary algorithms to examine everything
 you look at to better provide you with... Focused, Relevant,
 Advertising you want to see.

 It doesn't matter if the spoon is open source if the soup is full of
 gooey chunks of proprietary content.

 
  I'm very curious to see what they come up with for a new windowing
 system.
  X windows is even more archaic than well you know.
  Also very curious to see how long until VNC can play nicely with their
  Chromeishness, and how well it can be remotely tunneled:  Hey I've got
  remote Chrome via SSH!  How long until we can hear

Re: [Eug-lug] Meeting netbool

2009-06-04 Thread Ben Barrett
I don't think you'll find any/many dual-core netbooks, all the ones I've
seen use the 270 chip, which is hyperthreaded but single-core (don't be
confused by the kernel's recognition of hyperthreading which will show cpu0
and cpu1).  I got one of those MSI Wind Net-stations (the barebones desktop,
~$150 at newegg) and it is a dandy.  Is there something in particular you
need out of the graphics, which you're concerned about?  I got some type of
hardware acceleration out of the box, using the latest ubuntu 9.04 I had
burned and installed.  Looks good, I think I'm only driving 1280x1024
though.  I do wish it had a second video-out.  There are Atom board out
there which take expansion, too :) But the MSI Wind desktop models (the
*newer* one is dual-core, look carefully at the specs b/c they did make a
270-chipped model first, AFAICT) are pretty easy to setup and has been
perfectly reliable (mine is in a filthy environment, but only for a few
weeks so far).  Like many laptops, the fan kicks as you actually use the CPU
more, and I've read that some extra thermal paste done carefully (some mods
include massive heatsinks too of course) can reduce this.  The dual-core
barebones model I got (cpu in place, didn't notice if it was socketed or
soldered) even includes a wifi antennae.  If they only supported 64-bit and
8GB RAM, eh?  :)

Best of luck,

Ben

PS - I am confused about your question.  You seem to be questioning the
vendors, but speak of quality control.  I bought from NewEgg, but yes, also
have experience shopping with the vendors you listed, and they're all about
the same, although NewEgg and others seem more agile which only shows up
when there are problems/confusions.  If you watch the sales on dealnews or
techbargains or whatever you will probably see it.  What they call the
Nettop 100 model seems to be the Atom 330 dual-core.  Looks like the
regular price is now $150 at newegg, I think I saw $143 on sale and the
single-core earlier model is in the $120's now, on sale... with many of
these places, be sure to compare the free-shipping items, if you haven't,
since the shipping cost could exceed other price differences :)  Not always
of course!  Hard drives are so cheap now, if you need a new drive don't
forget to look at the larger sizes; the smaller ones are often more
expensive lately, unless someone's dumping stock.  Some kind of secret
profit against those who do not evolve their system specs accordingly when
they buy more systems or parts  =/



On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Jim K 12 kj...@clearwire.net wrote:

  would anybody have a nettbook with intel graphics that they could bring
 tonight for a quic k demo. I am thinking of getting a cheap barebones msi
 system with an atom 330 dual prcoessor  and  and intel 950 GMA graqphics.
 While double checking the graphics I found several which might be better,
 though quality control is probably lacking. Does anyone have experience
 shopping with Systemmax (TigerDirect, CompUSA, Circuit City). If so what
 were the results. I know in my price range the quality will be on the low
 side. I want  dual core, 1-2Gb ram and at least 100Gb SATA 7200rpm disk. I
 have a CD/DVD drive. It will be a Linux box so no need for a complete system
 with O/S. I have seen several Intel Atom 330 systems for around $200, and
 that is my target. I already have mouse, keyboard, crt, etc. I will upgrade
 to LCD screen when I have the money.
 Jim K
 Neil Parker wrote:

 So are we back at MrO's place this week?

   - Neil Parker
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug




 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Meeting netbook

2009-06-04 Thread Ben Barrett
Right on.  What sort of apps do you run?  Mine is not jerky, but
xscreensaver has been the main 3D load =/

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Jim K 12 kj...@clearwire.net wrote:

 I am more concerned about the graphic display abilities based on the
 reviews I have read than the ability of the processor. I occasionally
 download short videos 2-30 minutes long. I was wondering how jerkiness of
 the display.
 Jim K
 Ben Barrett wrote:

 I don't think you'll find any/many dual-core netbooks, all the ones I've
 seen use the 270 chip, which is hyperthreaded but single-core (don't be
 confused by the kernel's recognition of hyperthreading which will show cpu0
 and cpu1).  I got one of those MSI Wind Net-stations (the barebones desktop,
 ~$150 at newegg) and it is a dandy.  Is there something in particular you
 need out of the graphics, which you're concerned about?  I got some type of
 hardware acceleration out of the box, using the latest ubuntu 9.04 I had
 burned and installed.  Looks good, I think I'm only driving 1280x1024
 though.  I do wish it had a second video-out.  There are Atom board out
 there which take expansion, too :)
 But the MSI Wind desktop models (the *newer* one is dual-core, look
 carefully at the specs b/c they did make a 270-chipped model first, AFAICT)
 are pretty easy to setup and has been perfectly reliable (mine is in a
 filthy environment, but only for a few weeks so far).  Like many laptops,
 the fan kicks as you actually use the CPU more, and I've read that some
 extra thermal paste done carefully (some mods include massive heatsinks too
 of course) can reduce this.  The dual-core barebones model I got (cpu in
 place, didn't notice if it was socketed or soldered) even includes a wifi
 antennae.  If they only supported 64-bit and 8GB RAM, eh?  :)

 Best of luck,

 Ben

 PS - I am confused about your question.  You seem to be questioning the
 vendors, but speak of quality control.  I bought from NewEgg, but yes, also
 have experience shopping with the vendors you listed, and they're all about
 the same, although NewEgg and others seem more agile which only shows up
 when there are problems/confusions.  If you watch the sales on dealnews or
 techbargains or whatever you will probably see it.  What they call the
 Nettop 100 model seems to be the Atom 330 dual-core.  Looks like the
 regular price is now $150 at newegg, I think I saw $143 on sale and the
 single-core earlier model is in the $120's now, on sale... with many of
 these places, be sure to compare the free-shipping items, if you haven't,
 since the shipping cost could exceed other price differences :)  Not always
 of course!  Hard drives are so cheap now, if you need a new drive don't
 forget to look at the larger sizes; the smaller ones are often more
 expensive lately, unless someone's dumping stock.  Some kind of secret
 profit against those who do not evolve their system specs accordingly when
 they buy more systems or parts  =/



 On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Jim K 12 kj...@clearwire.net mailto:
 kj...@clearwire.net wrote:

 would anybody have a nettbook with intel graphics that they could
bring tonight for a quic k demo. I am thinking of getting a cheap
barebones msi system with an atom 330 dual prcoessor  and  and
intel 950 GMA graqphics. While double checking the graphics I
found several which might be better, though quality control is
probably lacking. Does anyone have experience shopping with
Systemmax (TigerDirect, CompUSA, Circuit City). If so what were
the results. I know in my price range the quality will be on the
low side. I want  dual core, 1-2Gb ram and at least 100Gb SATA
7200rpm disk. I have a CD/DVD drive. It will be a Linux box so no
need for a complete system with O/S. I have seen several Intel
Atom 330 systems for around $200, and that is my target. I already
have mouse, keyboard, crt, etc. I will upgrade to LCD screen when
I have the money.
Jim K
Neil Parker wrote:

So are we back at MrO's place this week?

  - Neil Parker
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org mailto:euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug



___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org mailto:euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


 

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug



 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Looking for digi camera / webcam

2009-06-03 Thread Ben Barrett
Yes, they are used quite a bit for stop-motion development, among other
things.For example, look at the Capture column of this support doc:
http://www.boinx.com/istopmotion/support/inputdevices/
Not all that many have a Yes, but plenty do not sure if this is
actually part of the PTP (picture transfer protocol),
which apparently varies quite a bit.

Is your project idea secret?

Ben


On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Matt Jarvis matt.jar...@kingrs.com wrote:

 Apparently this is a hard critter to track down...

 I am working on a project where I want to have a reasonably capable
 digital camera that will also function while tethered to a laptop. I
 believe this would in effect make it a 'webcam'. I've tried this with a
 half dozen cameras so far and they each shut down the camera functions
 once you connect them to the computer.

 I want to be able to capture images either by user clicking the cameras
 buttons i.e. via a camera interface, and it would be nice to have Twain
 and WIA driver support as well so I can go fetch the images via
 programmatic control if I choose.

 Does anyone know of such a thing?

 I've got a cheesy old eyeball webcam that does this, but of course it
 takes crappy pictures...

 Calls to local camera shops and they think I'm kinda nuts...


 Matt Jarvis
 Programmer/DBA
 King | Retail Solutions






 Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains
 information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy
 laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the
 intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from
 retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this
 information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have
 received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank
 you in advance for your cooperation.
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Looking for digi camera / webcam

2009-06-03 Thread Ben Barrett
So how does the camera fit in, un-tethered?  (or are you looking for a
digitcal camera instead of a webcam, for the extra resolution?)Laptop cart
in the field?  Hope you have all-terrain tires :)  How about a four-wheeler?
 ;)
But seriously... why send a full computer?  There are many ways to deliver
tagged content, for example an iPhone or n8xx could deliver geo-tagged
photos by email with audio or other text annotations, then have the server
create the new record entry.  Lighten the client, reduce some liability?
A cart does make people look official though =P


On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Matt Jarvis matt.jar...@kingrs.com wrote:


   Is your project idea secret?
   Ben

 Not a secret

 We intend to have QA reps out in the field double checking our
 installation work for defects. User pushes cart w/ laptop/camera around,
 finds a defect, has our app create a new record entry, enters some
 notes, take/aquire a picture, move on


 Matt Jarvis
 Programmer/DBA
 King | Retail Solutions






 Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains
 information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy
 laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the
 intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from
 retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this
 information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have
 received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank
 you in advance for your cooperation.
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Looking for digi camera / webcam

2009-06-03 Thread Ben Barrett
Kinda going with that, a camera with a wifi-SD or CF card could be located
(triangulated/radiolocated, [1]) locally.  There's a lot of existing work
you could borrow from there, to streamline the data capture and minimize
error (hopefully!).  My earlier mention of a cellphone-like device supports
this too [2] Does anyone know off-hand if any of the miniature GPS chipsets
support differential setups (DGPS, [3])?
I got wary when you suggested that the support ticket would be created
onsite; I see that simply as generating and submitting the needed data.  :)
 Too much time on the servers, I guess, makes a healthy distrust of the
client.  Is that a claimed maxim or quip, somewhere I could source??

Ben

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiolocation
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_GPS
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DGPS

PS - So you have a photo and where it was taken, and it'd be useful to know
the nature of the fault.  Maybe keeping the cameras locked into spot-focus
(and keeping the frame centered on the fault) would help.  Would audio
annotation or even speech recognition fit in that part of the process?  I'm
not seeing moving-data-around as the problem, but then I only have a little
window into your scenario :)  Hope this helps...


On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Chris LeBlanc leblanc...@gmail.com wrote:

  Matt,

 Just to clarify, this is defects in the finished on-site retail locations,
 such as paint peeling, incorrect height on counters, etc...?  Someone would
 go in after the work had been done, but before final sign-off by the
 buyer, id any problems and take a photo of it?  If so, you are just trying
 to streamline the process of identifying and photographing the problem,
 without having someone go through, take dozens of photos, and then process
 them all later?

 In that scenario, what if they wanted to create a group of photos to
 properly show the problem they have identified, or give better perspective
 of the problem?  Would this system be setup to have one photo for each
 entry, or would there be multiple photos, each assigned a problem ID, with
 multiple photos given the same problem ID?

 I see something where the person goes through with a digital camera, takes
 the pictures, connects to a laptop and starts the software.   The software
 then has an area that shows thumbnails from the laptop, and a problem ID
 area.  They can then either search for a problem, or enter a new problem.
 Then, they can select the photos assigned to that problem and submit them.
 Then they can continue with the next problem.

 Is that what you are thinking about, or am I way off base?

 Chris



 Matt Jarvis wrote:

   Is your project idea secret?
   Ben


  Not a secret

 We intend to have QA reps out in the field double checking our
 installation work for defects. User pushes cart w/ laptop/camera around,
 finds a defect, has our app create a new record entry, enters some
 notes, take/aquire a picture, move on


 Matt Jarvis
 Programmer/DBA
 King | Retail Solutions
   





 Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains 
 information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy 
 laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the 
 intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from 
 retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this 
 information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have 
 received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank 
 you in advance for your cooperation.
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing 
 listeug...@euglug.orghttp://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] ISP experiences in Eugene?

2009-06-01 Thread Ben Barrett
Sigh, I chose the greater of two evils, but I can say that the speedboost
thing works wonders, I'm not even sure if it is just on singular download
streams, but wow, it might be time to tune those TCP settings more
aggressively, since the medium-sized ISO's like bootable biz cards really
lose out, relative to full-size distro's, by this scheme IMO :) That is to
say, I have no problems with it.  On a UPS, it has stayed online through a
number of local power issues and handles my dedicated PAP2 phone adapter
quite well (via viatalk fwiw).  Make sure you get your last-mile [sic] of
cable upgraded if you're in an older place; you can explain that you're
likely to upgrade to the business-grade service level and they probably
won't complain.  Same things goes for DSL, of course, you need decent wires
in any case.  I've seen wiring issues dictate the choices in some
situations: nobody likes crawling around in insulation, that I know of.

Ben


On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Quentin Hartman qhart...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Joshua N Pritikin jpriti...@pobox.comwrote:

 What is the collective wisdom on ISPs in Eugene? I'm moving to a house
 near Chambers and 18th. I need a decent internet connection. I use VoIP
 extensively and will likely get a telecommute job. What are my options?


 I second Larry's statements. Qwest and Comcast are essentially the only
 games in town, Unless you count Clearwire or a cellular-based option, which
 I wouldn't if you want to have good VoIP performance.

 I have used Qwest personally for 8+ years and have been happy with them.
 I'm on their 7Mb plan. Lately they've had some performance problems, but
 they have been easy to resolve by calling support and after a short
 rain-dance having them switch my line to a different circuit. I assume
 that customer-supportese for The upstream connection you were on was
 overloaded, so we've routed you to a different one..

 The compnay I work for uses Comcast at the office, we're on the 20Mb
 business package. It's pretty costly for personal use (~160 / mo) but it has
 been reliable and performs very well. If I didn't have such philosophical
 problems with Comcast (I know Qwest has issues too, but their the lesser of
 two evils if you ask me) I'd probably switch to a similar plan at home. The
 latency advantage that cable has over DSL is hard to ignore.

 QH


 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Linux box emulating a keyboard?

2009-06-01 Thread Ben Barrett
Ho hum, I dunno about chipset support for that.  :)
This one seems to cover the PS2 mouse  keyboard protocol pretty well:
http://www.computer-engineering.org/ps2protocol/
The Communication sections therein actually look pretty good and might get
you further along, if you haven't already found that too.

Hardware could solve it, but since you're a primarily a software guy (albeit
closer to hardware than me!), couldn't you just virtualize the windows
environment, and load it up on boot?  Darn windurrs.

Ben

PS - fwiw, I came across a cool tiny linux I have not seen before, although
it uses parallel ports:
http://atomic.eyedropvideo.com/remote1.shtml  Atomic Linux, free
automation (mini-distro, for floppy disk on old hardware)


On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Bob Miller k...@jogger-egg.com wrote:

 On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Bill Barry bar...@proaxis.com wrote:
  On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Bob Miller k...@jogger-egg.com wrote:
  On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Just my hunch, I think using USB would be easier; AFAIK you can switch
 modes
  (host/slave) if the hardware will support it, as has been done with
 n770
  (8xx too?).
 
  Hmmm.  Does the Intel UHCI/EHCI support slave mode?  Switched
  per-port?
 
  and, do you really need linux?
   http://www.obdev.at/products/vusb/prjhid.html
  :)
 
  My first thought was an Arduino.  The Arduino docs indicate that the HW
  is capable of emulating PS/2, and it has a serial-over-USB interface as
 well.
  But I'd be writing more software than this project warrants.
 
  --
  Bob Miller  Kbob
 k...@jogger-egg.com
 
 
  Do you need the keyboard at boot? Otherwise you could just use VNC.

 Yeah, I know about VNC, qemu, rdesktop, VMware, synergy, x2vnc, and
 some other things.  I need a way to enter input before the network is up.
 After the network is up, I'll be using synergy.

 I can install as much software as I want on the Linux side, but it needs
 to look like a hardware keyboard to the Windows box.  Sorry I didn't make
 that clear in my first post.

 --
 Bob Miller  Kbob
k...@jogger-egg.com
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] official Ubuntu 9.04 CDs @ ComputerBase

2009-05-18 Thread Ben Barrett
And I can confirm, it appears to be a good distro :)  I had to increase the
shared memory allocation to get zoneminder's detection working at reasonable
resolution, that was the trickiest part so far.  Very nice stuff here, ++.

Ben


On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:57 PM, notanathe...@yahoo.com wrote:


 We have a very limited amount of official Ubuntu 9.04 CDs if anybody needs
 one. Limit one since you can copy it all you like.

 That be all,
 Mr O.


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


[Eug-lug] Fwd: [cjobs] Classified Job Announcements: Operating Systems/Network Analyst 3 ($4470 - $6814 Monthly)

2009-05-06 Thread Ben Barrett
union job, must have:

 ... basic foundation of knowledge of complex technical problem solving in
 operating systems programs, maintenance, systems administration, and network
 systems that would normally be obtained through a bachelor's degree,
 typically in information systems, computer science, or a related technical
 field, and/or equivalent technical training and/or extensive demonstrated
 independent technical problem solving experience.

 In addition these positions require:

 * 5 years of applicable hands-on experience supporting data computer
 systems or services which serve 500 or more end-users;
 * Fluency in at least one scripting or programming language (for example:
 PERL, shell scripting tools, Python, C);
 * Excellent technical writing and verbal communication skills and ability
 to communicate effectively with individuals from diverse backgrounds and
 cultures;
 * U.S. citizenship or other eligibility for employment in the U.S. under
 currently prevailing federal regulations.

 Preferred Qualifications:
 * Experience in messaging systems, LDAP directory systems, and/or GIS
 systems;
 * Experience in hardening of Linux applications for use in untrusted
 environments;
 * Experience with web based application development;
 * Experience with IP Telephony systems support or development;
 * Experience with open source development;
 * Experience with Avaya Communications systems support

 Must pass criminal background check.



-- Forwarded message --
From: Human Resources cbr...@uoregon.edu
Date: Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:00 PM
Subject: [cjobs] Classified Job Announcements
To: cj...@lists.uoregon.edu


UO Classified Job Announcements

Operating Systems/Network Analyst 3
Information Services
http://hr.uoregon.edu/jobs/classified.php?id=3128

--
To unsubscribe yourself from this list, visit
http://hr.uoregon.edu/jobs/unsubscribe.php
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] IP based security camera with motion detection

2009-05-02 Thread Ben Barrett
Try ZoneMinder, it works great for both v4l and ip camera sources; you  
must get the camera's best urls though, google helped me on that.  I  
have both a linksys and a d-link going.  I staged my ZM in vmware,  
will be migrating to a dedicated atom nettop next week. :)

Maybe we could do a demo, Allen?

Ben

On May 2, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Allen Brown abr...@peak.org wrote:


I think it is working now.

First I had to find the way to get jpegs from the camera.
My luck I found a reference to this on the web:
http://cam_driveway1/img/video.mjpeg

Only that gave a complaint about Invalid URL.  After staring at
the source code for about an hour it suddenly hit me that the
motion source code couldn't handle the underscore character
in the url.  Changing the camera device to cam-driveway1 made
it work.
--
Allen Brown  abrown at peak.org  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
 Anti-intellectual: Never trust anyone with an IQ over 30.


I have a Linksys WVC54GCA camera.  It connects to ethernet or WiFi.
I can point to it with firefox or vlc and see a good moving image.
It has configuration pages to email or ftp on detection of motion.
That doesn't work.  Perhaps it requires ActiveX.  They say it does.
Most of the web config doesn't require that.  And there's no reason
that config page should.  So it goes.

I don't have a Windoze computer.  I don't have ActiveX.

Linux should be able to do this.  There are web pages out there
that talk about how to use motion with ffserver and ffmpeg
to do this sort of capture.  I've spent a full day trying various
pages.  They don't work.

I only found one which actually talked about doing motion detection
with this camera.
http://www.infohit.net/blog/post/motion-capture-using-the-wvc54gc-with-linux.html
The instructions for ffmpeg don't seem to work.  When I run ffmpeg
with the indicated options I get I/O error occurred.

Trying to debug this is black magic.  It involves passing streams
in and out of web portals on my computer.  (I don't know why they
couldn't have just used pipes.  So much simpler.)

Please note that I am talking about cameras that talk ethernet.
Not USB.  USB cameras need to have a computer within 5 meters.
That's not very useful.

Does anybody on this list have this sort of thing working?
What documentation did you follow?
--
Allen Brown  abrown at peak.org  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
  Cogito ergo spud - I think, therefore I yam.
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug






___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


[Eug-lug] double whammy? detachable-screen netbook, $150?

2009-04-15 Thread Ben Barrett
I thought this was pretty steamy news, 'hope you agree, though it looks more
like a detachable keyboard to me:

http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/15/aware-launches-a-view-netbook-with-detachable-screen-for-150/

Anyone have links or memories of a detachable-keyboard (or -screen) portable
being done before?

Thanks,

Ben
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Linux appliance?

2009-04-14 Thread Ben Barrett
Google found something here:
http://shop.openrb.com/index.php?main_page=indexcPath=18
I didn't see USB at first glance, but they have ether and mini-pci, CF,
etc...

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Bob Carlson b...@rjcarlson.com wrote:

 Yeah I actually spent a lot of time looking at DD-WRT and OpenWRT. DD-WRT
 doesn't have ntpd as someone pointed out. I would use OpenWRT, but I want to
 find a better platform than the Linksys. I also want to connect a flash
 drive to a GB or 2 of storage for the tftp server.

 Anybody know a nice little fan-less box that supports OpenWRT and has USB
 and Ethernet ports? A board and case combo bought separately would be OK
 too.

 Cheers, Bob
 Eugene, OR - Tucson, AZ



 -Original Message-
 From: euglug-boun...@euglug.org [mailto:euglug-boun...@euglug.org] On
 Behalf Of Bob Miller
 Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 8:07 PM
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Linux appliance?

 Sounds like a job for a Linksys WRT54GL running
 OpenWRT, ddWRT or similar.  List price $70.


 On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bob Carlson b...@rjcarlson.com wrote:
  I’m looking for a cheap embedded Linux Box that runs off of flash and can
 be
  set up to run ntpd, tftpd and maybe a couple of other basic network
  functions. I haven’t found anything that is really straightforward to use
  yet. Anybody got any suggestions?
 
 
 
  Cheers, Bob
 
 
 
  Bob Carlson | +1 541 484 0148 (office)  | +1 520 299 0725 (office)  | +1
 541
  521 9525 (mobile)
 
  b...@rjcarlson.com  | bob.carl...@gmail.com (mobile) | rjcarlson49 (aim
 or
  skype)
 
 
 
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 



 --
 Bob Miller  Kbob
k...@jogger-egg.com
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Linux appliance?

2009-04-13 Thread Ben Barrett
The folks who produce Damn Small Linux (DSL) have a store, I purchased their
$200 fanless system for a client, and while it might not be the absolute
cheapest price, it did come preloaded with DSL on flash, ready to boot, and
I (we) supported a cool linux project (or the people behind it).

http://damnsmalllinux.org/store/Mini_ITX_Systems

The MSI Wind, desktop model, is also a very nice linux box -- if you look
for it, be sure to get the newer dual-core (Atom 330, IIRC, not the 270
chip) version that is not the very-new 1.66Ghz, but the first dual-core
atom (1.6Ghz, IIRC).  These are nice machines, I've done a little with them
on both 'doze and linux, and... have been readying about osx86 on it :)  I'm
pretty sure that if you google around you'll find someone who has
underclocked it to a fanless-stable configuration... that might be even
cheaper (~$150), and a much faster boxen ;)
Although I'm not sure what you'd have to do to make one completely fanless
(open PSU, or just tweak software/bios?).

Best regards,

Ben


On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bob Carlson b...@rjcarlson.com wrote:

  I’m looking for a cheap embedded Linux Box that runs off of flash and can
 be set up to run ntpd, tftpd and maybe a couple of other basic network
 functions. I haven’t found anything that is really straightforward to use
 yet. Anybody got any suggestions?



 Cheers, Bob



 *Bob Carlson *| +1 541 484 0148 (office)  | +1 520 299 0725 (office)  | +1
 541 521 9525 (mobile)

 b...@rjcarlson.com  | bob.carl...@gmail.com (mobile) |* *rjcarlson49 (aim
 or skype)



 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Linux appliance?

2009-04-13 Thread Ben Barrett
Yikes, routers without ntp??
http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Network_Time_Protocol

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Allen Brown abr...@peak.org wrote:

 Yes, that's what I thought of.  But I don't know if there is a
 package for ntpd or if you would have to compile it yourself.
 For instance I don't think tomato provides this.  Those other
 two could very well.

 Is this private network facing or world facing?
 --
 Allen Brown  abrown at peak.org  
 http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/%7Eabrown/
  Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.
  --- Sir Winston Churchill

  Sounds like a job for a Linksys WRT54GL running
  OpenWRT, ddWRT or similar.  List price $70.
 
 
  On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bob Carlson b...@rjcarlson.com wrote:
  I’m looking for a cheap embedded Linux Box that runs off of flash and
  can be
  set up to run ntpd, tftpd and maybe a couple of other basic network
  functions. I haven’t found anything that is really straightforward to
  use
  yet. Anybody got any suggestions?
 
 
 
  Cheers, Bob
 
 
 
  Bob Carlson | +1 541 484 0148 (office)Â  | +1 520 299 0725 (office)Â  |
  +1 541
  521 9525 (mobile)
 
  b...@rjcarlson.com  | bob.carl...@gmail.com (mobile) | rjcarlson49 (aim
  or
  skype)
 
 
  --
  Bob Miller  Kbob
  k...@jogger-egg.com




 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Need to Talk to someone

2009-04-09 Thread Ben Barrett
Exactly -- there are a number of ways to get there; changing partitions on
the only drive holding your data should be done very *carefully*.

You didn't mention how much data you have, which is a moving target of
course.  If you have enough free space, consider making an archive (using
tar + gzip/bzip, or zip, etc) to see how well it compressed, and to give you
one file to work with.  I usually keep the working copy unbundled as well,
but if you date an archive then you'll begin to have a history available in
case any files need to be reverted or compared to in the future.  Also, if
you have access to a modern internet connection, you can consider uploading
a (scrambled, if need be) backup there.
The measures taken should be proportional to the value and replacability of
your data.  I agree that a thumb drive or external hard drive would be the
easiest  most common approach, but in terms of learning linux, a
partition/data shuffle for a single-drive update is a good exercise.  You
can probably just use a bootable CD of your new favorite linux distribution,
to perform the partition change, data migration, and re-install; be sure to
use the nice GUI tools for the partitioning changes if you're not versed
with the command line fdisk or equivalent.

Did you want off-list help, do you need someone on-site?

Best regards,

Ben



On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:45 AM, larry price lapr...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Robert.

 It should not be too hard to preserve your data across Operating
 System versions.

 The right way to do this is to have your home  directory on a separate
 partition from your OS, this means that you can potentially boot into
 one OS access some specialised software and write a document and then
 reboot into a different os and load the same document.

 To get their from having one big partition, you will need to create a
 new partition, copy data to it and then do your OS upgrades.

 You will want to read http://tldp.org/HOWTO/html_single/Partition/



 On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Robert Douglass r...@oregonfast.net
 wrote:
  I need to talk to someone about linux, I have PCOS on my computer and I
 want
  to change to another distribution, but not loose all my data on hard
 drive.
  My number is 541-272-1138 Bob call anytime
  I am into EMC-2 and mini-itx form factor boards, and wifi solutions, I
 live
  on the coast in Newport.
  Thank You
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Web admin for postfix

2009-04-06 Thread Ben Barrett
BobC, from what I can see, SquirrelMail does not handle this in its core,
but rather by plugins like this one:
http://squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=264  (AFAIK multiple plugins
exist to handle forwarding in SM)

From what I've seen of SquirrelMail, if it is setup nicely it offers the
features users expect, however, for the faint of CLI/config-file, better
luck may be had with Zimbra or even Gmail services.

KBob, did you find anything at http://www.postfix.org/addon.html#config ??

Have you looked at Usermin?  (related to webmin)  Some of my clients use the
cPanel utility for handling email forwarding  more on their standard
hosting accounts; this seems easy enough to use, but I know cPanel is not
free, but I couldn't figure out if their forwarding component was borrowed
from some other project...

Also, google found me this page which might be a decent place for you to
check:
http://www.debianadmin.com/postfix-mail-server-web-interfacefrontend-or-gui-tools.html
(although many projects linked from there are dead)

Best of luck,

Ben



On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Bob Crandell b...@assuredcomp.com wrote:

  I thought it was a layer over the top of Sendmail, Postfix, Qmail.  But it
 does what you are describing.



 On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 08:52 -0700, Bob Miller wrote:

 I thought Squirrelmail was an MUA.  I'm looking for a way to delegatemail 
 routing to users.  The mail will, for the most part, be stored andread 
 elsewhere (e.g., gmail or yahoo mail).
 For example, user fred has domain example.com.  He wants to set 
 upf...@example.com to go to dumbcave...@yahoo.com andwi...@example.com to go 
 to w.flintst...@comcast.net.that's what I want to delegate so Fred can set up 
 Pebbles'and Dino's forwarding himself.
 Thanks...
 On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Bob Crandell b...@assuredcomp.com wrote: 
 Have you looked at Squirrel Mail? - Bob Crandell Assured Computing, Inc. 
 http://www.assuredcomp.com/ 541-868-0331 ComputerBase 
 http://www.computerbaseusa.com/ 541-349-0404 On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 10:17 
 -0700, Bob Miller wrote: I am looking for a web-based admin interface for 
 postfix. I have a server that does mail routing for a bunch of domains that 
 are owned by different people, and I would like a way for them to be able to 
 update how their own mail is forwarded. Google found dtc and postfixadmin. 
  Any opinions on those or other packages? 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Technologie_Control 
 http://sourceforge.net/projects/postfixadmin/ Thanks. 
 ___ EUGLUG mailing list 
 euglug@euglug.org http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug



 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] OT:: shopping for external USB HD

2009-03-22 Thread Ben Barrett
I would suggest getting an all-in-one unit with a hefty warranty that
covers both the interface and the drive.
If data loss would be a problem, buy 2 or more.  My priority questions
for you would be:
What problems regarding this unit would be unbearable, and how are they solved.

Looks like you don't need speed, but you want reliability.  Unless
you're an experienced hardware hacker, or at least system builder.
I would guess that almost anything you do inside the box will reduce
reliability...  but hey some people work on their own car, and some
people do not -- and this is a software-environment-oriented audience,
last time I checked :)

Ben


On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:42 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:
 You did mention that price wasn't that critical, but I subscribe to a
 service that posts me when phenomenal deals come along and last week there
 was a 1Tb external usb HD in a fan-cooled  enclosure for 69 bux.  Didn't
 keep it--but if something like that drifts in soon you want me to flag it
 and send it to you?

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Parrot the multi language VM released version 1.0 today

2009-03-18 Thread Ben Barrett
Server down?  I can't get through to them..  the digg effect?

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:40 PM, larry price lapr...@gmail.com wrote:
 http://www.parrot.org/

 Rumour has it that Duke Nukem Forever is being ported to it :-)

 The list of languages it supports is impressive
 https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/Languages
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


[Eug-lug] Fwd: Corvallis Beaver BarCamp III

2009-02-27 Thread Ben Barrett
Hey folks, this announcement was sent along helpfully, thought I'd relay :)


-- Forwarded message --
From: Tim Budd b...@eecs.oregonstate.edu
Date: Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:35 PM
Subject: Corvallis Beaver BarCamp III
To: undisclosed-recipients


I'm sending the following because you attended one of the previous two
Corvallis BarCamps's.
--tim
-
On Saturday, April 4th, the Open Source Lab and the School of
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at
Oregon State University will be hosting the 3rd Beaver BarCamp in the
new Kelly Engineering center on the OSU Campus.
What is a BarCamp, you ask?  On www.barcamp.org you find the following
description:
BarCamp is an ad-hoc gathering born from the desire for people to
share and learn in an open environment.
It is an intense event with discussions, demos and interaction from
participants.
In recent years BarCamps have been hugely popular, and have been held
all over the world -
See the web link mentioned for a few recent camps.

A BarCamp is sometimes described as an unconference. Like a
conference, a BarCamp is organized into sessions,
with breaks for coffee and tea, free food, and socializing. Unlike a
traditional conference,
topics are not decided in advance. Instead, talks are spontaneously
organized on the ground in real-time.
Most attendees are expected to arrive at BarCamp with at least one
topic they are passionately interested in
discussing during a 50-minuit session. Potential presenters describe
their topic on post-it notes,
everybody votes on their favorite topics, rooms are assigned to topics
according to the number of participants,
and things are off and running.

Topics can cover anything that people want to discuss. In earlier
BarCamps most talks have been on current technical
tools and issues, but there have also been discussions on
sustainability, community building, science fiction,
knitting patterns, techniques for losing weight, and platonic solids.
Because the participants decide the agenda,
everybody has the chance to be part of a discussion they are truly
interested in.

Although participation at BarCamp is free, the organizers would like
people to register their intent to come
at the web site http://www.barcamp.org/BeaverBarCamp. That way they
know how many tee-shirts and how much food to order.

Sign up and plan on coming to Beaver BarCamp!

As an added bonus, the Friday night before BarCamp there will be the
2nd Ignite Corvallis event.
See http://ignitecorvallis.com/ for information on that event.
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Chromium port to Wine for Linux and OS X

2009-02-26 Thread Ben Barrett
Sounds cool, but does this smell like StarOffice  Sun, to anyone else??
WebKit is good, though -- just wondering whether this is really a case
of open source benefiting from proprietary code, or vice versa...


On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:14 AM, marbux mar...@gmail.com wrote:
 Got an email from Codeweavers about a new release. Don't recall what I
 did to wind up on their mailing list. But I thought I'd check out what
 was new on their site since the last time I visited. Ran across this
 interesting bit: a proof of concept port of the open source Chromium
 browser to Wine for Linux and the Mac.
 http://www.codeweavers.com/services/ports/chromium/. Packages
 available for several Linux distros.

 Doubt that there's anyone on the list who didn't already know it, but
 just in case: Chromium is a Google open source project on which their
 proprietary Chrome browser is based. It's based in turn on the WebKit
 application framework, which traces back to a fork in the KDE KHTML
 code base begun by Apple. KDE developers are submitting patches for
 WebKit and there's speculation that WebKit will succeed KHTML. I'm not
 sure how certain that is. More about WebKit than you probably wanted
 to know here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webkit. Google is working
 on a native port of Chrome to Linux. There's also a port of Chromium
 but sounds like it's way far away from read-for-primetime.
 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxBuildInstructions.

 Best regards,

 Paul

 --
 Universal Interoperability Council
 http:www.universal-interop-council.org
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Chromium port to Wine for Linux and OS X

2009-02-26 Thread Ben Barrett
From what I'm seeing in the mobile market, both from devices and the
content push,
the world needs webkit on a lot of handhelds!  Our economic survival
might just rely on it.
Heh, but who's getting gubbermint grants for webkit?  ;)

Ben


On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:13 PM, marbux mar...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Sounds cool, but does this smell like StarOffice  Sun, to anyone else??
 WebKit is good, though -- just wondering whether this is really a case
 of open source benefiting from proprietary code, or vice versa...

 I'm wary of it. I think there's that kind of danger any time you have
 folks answering to stockholders in the code stewardship role on an
 open source project whose code base plays the crippleware role to a
 proprietary product.

 OTOH, the Chromium-unique code is BSD-licensed, so no legal barriers
 to recycling the code under other licenses such as the Gnu licenses.
 But note that Chromium comes with some third party code issued under
 other licenses. http://code.google.com/chromium/terms.html#3rdparty.
 The ones  I'm familiar with pose no barrier to recycling under other
 licenses as I recall, but there are a couple that I haven't studied.

 I haven't investigated the Chromium Project in depth. But my nose
 tells me to be more interested long term in what KDE does in regard to
 WebKit. They've been contributing WebKit patches and there were some
 rumbles awhile back that KDE is moving toward deprecating KHTML in
 favor of WebKit. I haven't checked to see if that's true.

 There's no crippleware business model and no vendor brutally
 controlling the KDE code base that I know of. :-) So I'm guessing that
 a KDE branch might be the WebKit wagon that winds up with the FOSS
 Clydesdale hitched to it. But that's only a guess. Time will tell.

 Best regards,

 Paul


 --
 Universal Interoperability Council
 http:www.universal-interop-council.org
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


[Eug-lug] Fwd: video from australia zdnet - people can't tell kde4 from windows 7

2009-02-26 Thread Ben Barrett
Maybe this has made the rounds already?  Sorry to bother, if so, but I
found this entertaining.  Looks like easy to use is something
AppleMac popularized, that's a bummer for linuxfoss but not as much
as it is for Vista/W7.

http://olylug.org/read.php?73,13757
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: Linux Ubuntu Install Tutorial

2009-02-25 Thread Ben Barrett
Did I miss something, or are two word-capitalizations excessive (FLA's
 TLA's don't count, right)?
You used more than others:  three.  Need emoticons instead?

I'd like to point out that the iterations of attack vectors has little
to do with install tutorials and helping
n00bs.  Please remember that zealousness costs more lives than it
saves... and that the best way
to avoid STD's is to be chaste.  These people want to use computers,
and I'd suggest that their
non-enterprise-managed windows PC is likely to have some sort of
infection already.

If we want to be derisive, I could offer than windows infections will
soon become smart enough to
block users from installing another OS, or otherwise halting their own
uninstallation


On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Dave Compton to.dav...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes, Microsoft Windows, by default has zero write access to anything but
 NTFS and FAT.  So what?  Also, by default, Microsoft Windows has zero
 viruses.

 On the other hand, Windows by default does have access to other partitions
 and it's not hard to find windows code that is capable of writing to ext3
 format file systems.  I'm sure a smart virus writer would be able to
 incorporate that code into his virus and make the leap across partitions and
 operating systems if he wanted to.  If it has not been done that's because
 there's not much bang for the buck from the virus writer's point of view.

 Allen said Then whenever you boot Wubi you get the infection.  This tells
 me that the scenario that Allen imagined involved using wubi to install
 ubuntu, then picking up a virus while running windows which then somehow
 corrupts the boot file installed by wubi.exe in such a way that it in turn
 infects your ubuntu system.  Not impossible but I still think it would be
 easier to directly write to the ext3 filesystem from windows.  The point of
 my original post was to make a COMPARISON between the two risks.  I still
 think that the direct danger to a linux system from a infected windows
 windows system makes any additional risk due to having installed via wubi
 INSIGNIFICANT.

 Maybe Allen had something else in mind .  Several other possibilities
 occurred to me but in each case I could come up with a similar line of
 reasoning.

 If my reasoning is wrong please let me know but, in fact, I didn't
 COMPLETELY miss anything.

 - Dave

 p.s.  Maybe in the future we can skip the excessive caps.


 Mr O wrote:

 Except you COMPLETELY missed the fact that Microsoft Windows, by default,
 has ZERO write access to anything but NTFS and FAT.
 Now, infected Wubi.EXE, that's different. Many viruses target EXE files
 but a seperate partition is a no-go.


 --- On Tue, 2/24/09, Dave Compton to.dav...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Dave Compton to.dav...@gmail.com
 Subject: [Eug-lug] Re: Linux Ubuntu Install Tutorial
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 8:37 PM
 I think the greater danger is from dual booting windows
  linux (with or without wubi).  An infected windows
 machine could write malware directly to the unbooted linux
 partition.  This would be both an easier way of spreading an
 infection and more effective since *any* windows/linux
 system would be vulnerable to it - not just those that were
 installed via wubi.

 In fact, even the generic dual boot vulnerability seems
 like a pretty convoluted way to spread malware.  Once you
 have control of a windows machine, the thing to do would be
 to *use* that windows machine to carry out your evil plot -
 not try to infect an unused linux partition in the hope that
 it might someday be booted.  The windows - wubi -
 linux risk seems even lower.

 Once the wubi install process is complete you *do* end up
 with a linux system that, at a low level, piggybacks off of
 the windows boot system to work.  It bothers me too but just
 as a matter of principle - not for security reasons.

 - Dave

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: Linux Ubuntu Install Tutorial

2009-02-25 Thread Ben Barrett
(oops)...
 If we want to be derisive, I could offer than windows infections will
soon become smart enough to block users from installing another OS, or
otherwise halting their own uninstallation, or even virtualizing
themselves into the new OS (if cpu virt flags enabled).

Back to helping newbies install Ubuntu:
I think some videos for debugging scenarios would be awesome for
example, what do I do if I get the command prompt thingy?  What about
when my screen flashes and never gets into a graphical mode?  Is there
an easy way to capture and send some info (by email or thumbdrive) to
help with remote debugging, before  we give up on linux (again)?  :)
Or even, I tried to upload Office into Linux, but the CD won't run.
I think by using a bunch of short videos for a more-human explanation,
huge benefits are gained.  I know lots of folks who just don't read so
well, dyslexia or other cognititve distortion, where brief video
explanations for FAQs, as well as walk-throughs of (parts of) the
installation process would be dandy.

I do know video is harder to maintain, but instead of looking at is as
a feature-length documentary, so long as you don't get a horrible cold
or go through puberty during the project, a number of shorter vids can
be reasonably maintained.

Thanks  ciao,

Ben




On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Did I miss something, or are two word-capitalizations excessive (FLA's
  TLA's don't count, right)?
 You used more than others:  three.  Need emoticons instead?

 I'd like to point out that the iterations of attack vectors has little
 to do with install tutorials and helping
 n00bs.  Please remember that zealousness costs more lives than it
 saves... and that the best way
 to avoid STD's is to be chaste.  These people want to use computers,
 and I'd suggest that their
 non-enterprise-managed windows PC is likely to have some sort of
 infection already.

 If we want to be derisive, I could offer than windows infections will
 soon become smart enough to
 block users from installing another OS, or otherwise halting their own
 uninstallation


 On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Dave Compton to.dav...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes, Microsoft Windows, by default has zero write access to anything but
 NTFS and FAT.  So what?  Also, by default, Microsoft Windows has zero
 viruses.

 On the other hand, Windows by default does have access to other partitions
 and it's not hard to find windows code that is capable of writing to ext3
 format file systems.  I'm sure a smart virus writer would be able to
 incorporate that code into his virus and make the leap across partitions and
 operating systems if he wanted to.  If it has not been done that's because
 there's not much bang for the buck from the virus writer's point of view.

 Allen said Then whenever you boot Wubi you get the infection.  This tells
 me that the scenario that Allen imagined involved using wubi to install
 ubuntu, then picking up a virus while running windows which then somehow
 corrupts the boot file installed by wubi.exe in such a way that it in turn
 infects your ubuntu system.  Not impossible but I still think it would be
 easier to directly write to the ext3 filesystem from windows.  The point of
 my original post was to make a COMPARISON between the two risks.  I still
 think that the direct danger to a linux system from a infected windows
 windows system makes any additional risk due to having installed via wubi
 INSIGNIFICANT.

 Maybe Allen had something else in mind .  Several other possibilities
 occurred to me but in each case I could come up with a similar line of
 reasoning.

 If my reasoning is wrong please let me know but, in fact, I didn't
 COMPLETELY miss anything.

 - Dave

 p.s.  Maybe in the future we can skip the excessive caps.


 Mr O wrote:

 Except you COMPLETELY missed the fact that Microsoft Windows, by default,
 has ZERO write access to anything but NTFS and FAT.
 Now, infected Wubi.EXE, that's different. Many viruses target EXE files
 but a seperate partition is a no-go.


 --- On Tue, 2/24/09, Dave Compton to.dav...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Dave Compton to.dav...@gmail.com
 Subject: [Eug-lug] Re: Linux Ubuntu Install Tutorial
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 8:37 PM
 I think the greater danger is from dual booting windows
  linux (with or without wubi).  An infected windows
 machine could write malware directly to the unbooted linux
 partition.  This would be both an easier way of spreading an
 infection and more effective since *any* windows/linux
 system would be vulnerable to it - not just those that were
 installed via wubi.

 In fact, even the generic dual boot vulnerability seems
 like a pretty convoluted way to spread malware.  Once you
 have control of a windows machine, the thing to do would be
 to *use* that windows machine to carry out your evil plot -
 not try to infect an unused linux partition

Re: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?

2009-02-24 Thread Ben Barrett
Yep, I know curl is not mac-only :)  I thought it came from the mac
side of things though, but I guess I was wrong.  Wget prolly didn't
have mac support until the BSD basis, so I think that is where I got
my memory.  In other words, I believe that early (pre OS X) Macs had
cURL but not Wget.

Curl is copyrighted by the author only, not any umbrella org.
Wget is GPL'ed!

See:
http://daniel.haxx.se/docs/curl-vs-wget.html (by cURL's author)
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CURL
and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wget

My main notes:
curl is bi-directional, wget is down-only, but see wput also
wget is command-line only, no libs to call it from, whereas curl
offers many libs

Happy hacking!

Ben


On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Allen Brown abr...@peak.org wrote:
 curl huh?   I think wget will fix urls and such... curl is a mac
 thing, right?  :)

 $ apt-cache search curl | grep curl
 curl - Get a file from an HTTP, HTTPS or FTP server
 libcurl3 - Multi-protocol file transfer library (OpenSSL)
 libcurl3-dbg - libcurl compiled with debug symbols
 libcurl3-gnutls - Multi-protocol file transfer library (GnuTLS)
 libcurl4-gnutls-dev - Development files and documentation for libcurl
 (GnuTLS)
 libcurl4-openssl-dev - Development files and documentation for libcurl
 (OpenSSL)
 python-pycurl - Python bindings to libcurl
 python-pycurl-dbg - Python bindings to libcurl (debug extension)
 curlftpfs - filesystem to access FTP hosts based on FUSE and cURL
 flying - pool/snooker/carrom/hockey/curling simulator for X11
 gambas-gb-net-curl - The Gambas advanced networking component
 gambas2-gb-net-curl - The Gambas advanced networking component
 libcurl-ocaml - ocaml curl bindings
 libcurl-ocaml-dev - ocaml libcurl bindings
 liblua5.1-curl-dev - libcURL development files for the lua language
 version 5.1
 liblua5.1-curl0 - libcURL bindings for the lua language version 5.1
 libwww-curl-perl - Perl bindings to libcurl
 python-urljr - Common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests
 slang-curl - transfer files using HTTP and FTP from S-Lang
 spl-curl - SPL Programming Language -- curl adapter
 tclcurl - Tcl bindings to libcurl
 xmms2-plugin-curl - XMMS2 - curl transport for HTTP
 php5-curl - CURL module for php5
 gimp-libcurl - libcurl URI plugin for GIMP
 --
 Allen Brown  abrown at peak.org  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
  The secret of the demagogue is to make himself as stupid as his
  audience so that they believe they are as clever as he. ---Karl Kraus


 On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:09 PM, larry price lapr...@gmail.com wrote:
 #!/bin/bash

 for url in $( file_of_archived_bookmark_urls);
 do echo fetching $url;
 fname=$(cut -d\/ -f8  $url);
 curl $url  $fname;
 htmltidy $fname; #cleans up tag soup.
 done;

 Apply a little editing to the results and resolve the images and
 you're good to upload to the current site.




 On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 I was just hoping to recover nodes I'd edited back then...
 such as Seth's
 http://web.archive.org/web/20040625143131/wiki.euglug.org/index.php/SethCohn

 Ben


 On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Alan eug...@thebucks.net wrote:
 Ben Barrett wrote:

 History of EUGLUG:  Does anyone have an archive of the old wiki?
 (was it a phpwiki?)


 Since the goal of the current website is to decentralize the
 content, I
 encourage anyone who wants to write up a history to create an account
 on
 euglug.org and type away.

 -ajb
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug





 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?

2009-02-24 Thread Ben Barrett
How can I do that in vi?  :)

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:21 AM, larry price lapr...@gmail.com wrote:
 curl is MIT licensed

 I use
 curl -si $url |head

 for debugging apache configurations



 On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yep, I know curl is not mac-only :)  I thought it came from the mac
 side of things though, but I guess I was wrong.  Wget prolly didn't
 have mac support until the BSD basis, so I think that is where I got
 my memory.  In other words, I believe that early (pre OS X) Macs had
 cURL but not Wget.

 Curl is copyrighted by the author only, not any umbrella org.
 Wget is GPL'ed!

 See:
 http://daniel.haxx.se/docs/curl-vs-wget.html (by cURL's author)
 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CURL
 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wget

 My main notes:
 curl is bi-directional, wget is down-only, but see wput also
 wget is command-line only, no libs to call it from, whereas curl
 offers many libs

 Happy hacking!

 Ben


 On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Allen Brown abr...@peak.org wrote:
 curl huh?   I think wget will fix urls and such... curl is a mac
 thing, right?  :)

 $ apt-cache search curl | grep curl
 curl - Get a file from an HTTP, HTTPS or FTP server
 libcurl3 - Multi-protocol file transfer library (OpenSSL)
 libcurl3-dbg - libcurl compiled with debug symbols
 libcurl3-gnutls - Multi-protocol file transfer library (GnuTLS)
 libcurl4-gnutls-dev - Development files and documentation for libcurl
 (GnuTLS)
 libcurl4-openssl-dev - Development files and documentation for libcurl
 (OpenSSL)
 python-pycurl - Python bindings to libcurl
 python-pycurl-dbg - Python bindings to libcurl (debug extension)
 curlftpfs - filesystem to access FTP hosts based on FUSE and cURL
 flying - pool/snooker/carrom/hockey/curling simulator for X11
 gambas-gb-net-curl - The Gambas advanced networking component
 gambas2-gb-net-curl - The Gambas advanced networking component
 libcurl-ocaml - ocaml curl bindings
 libcurl-ocaml-dev - ocaml libcurl bindings
 liblua5.1-curl-dev - libcURL development files for the lua language
 version 5.1
 liblua5.1-curl0 - libcURL bindings for the lua language version 5.1
 libwww-curl-perl - Perl bindings to libcurl
 python-urljr - Common interface to urllib2 and curl for making HTTP requests
 slang-curl - transfer files using HTTP and FTP from S-Lang
 spl-curl - SPL Programming Language -- curl adapter
 tclcurl - Tcl bindings to libcurl
 xmms2-plugin-curl - XMMS2 - curl transport for HTTP
 php5-curl - CURL module for php5
 gimp-libcurl - libcurl URI plugin for GIMP
 --
 Allen Brown  abrown at peak.org  http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown/
  The secret of the demagogue is to make himself as stupid as his
  audience so that they believe they are as clever as he. ---Karl Kraus


 On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:09 PM, larry price lapr...@gmail.com wrote:
 #!/bin/bash

 for url in $( file_of_archived_bookmark_urls);
 do echo fetching $url;
 fname=$(cut -d\/ -f8  $url);
 curl $url  $fname;
 htmltidy $fname; #cleans up tag soup.
 done;

 Apply a little editing to the results and resolve the images and
 you're good to upload to the current site.




 On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 I was just hoping to recover nodes I'd edited back then...
 such as Seth's
 http://web.archive.org/web/20040625143131/wiki.euglug.org/index.php/SethCohn

 Ben


 On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Alan eug...@thebucks.net wrote:
 Ben Barrett wrote:

 History of EUGLUG:  Does anyone have an archive of the old wiki?
 (was it a phpwiki?)


 Since the goal of the current website is to decentralize the
 content, I
 encourage anyone who wants to write up a history to create an account
 on
 euglug.org and type away.

 -ajb
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug





 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?

2009-02-23 Thread Ben Barrett
I was just hoping to recover nodes I'd edited back then...
such as Seth's 
http://web.archive.org/web/20040625143131/wiki.euglug.org/index.php/SethCohn

Ben


On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Alan eug...@thebucks.net wrote:
 Ben Barrett wrote:

 History of EUGLUG:  Does anyone have an archive of the old wiki?
 (was it a phpwiki?)


 Since the goal of the current website is to decentralize the content, I
 encourage anyone who wants to write up a history to create an account on
 euglug.org and type away.

 -ajb
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?

2009-02-23 Thread Ben Barrett
curl huh?   I think wget will fix urls and such... curl is a mac
thing, right?  :)


On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:09 PM, larry price lapr...@gmail.com wrote:
 #!/bin/bash

 for url in $( file_of_archived_bookmark_urls);
 do echo fetching $url;
 fname=$(cut -d\/ -f8  $url);
 curl $url  $fname;
 htmltidy $fname; #cleans up tag soup.
 done;

 Apply a little editing to the results and resolve the images and
 you're good to upload to the current site.




 On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was just hoping to recover nodes I'd edited back then...
 such as Seth's 
 http://web.archive.org/web/20040625143131/wiki.euglug.org/index.php/SethCohn

 Ben


 On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Alan eug...@thebucks.net wrote:
 Ben Barrett wrote:

 History of EUGLUG:  Does anyone have an archive of the old wiki?
 (was it a phpwiki?)


 Since the goal of the current website is to decentralize the content, I
 encourage anyone who wants to write up a history to create an account on
 euglug.org and type away.

 -ajb
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?

2009-02-20 Thread Ben Barrett
History of EUGLUG:  Does anyone have an archive of the old wiki?
(was it a phpwiki?)

Ben


On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:24 PM, horst ho...@freeshell.org wrote:
 I met Rick Bronson in mid Dec 1996. At that time he was getting into/already
 doing(?) embedded systems on linux.
 Rick was listed on our early web pages as a local developer though I don't
 remember him being very active in the LUG.

 The earliest install disk I found in my museum is from 1998. (SuSE 5.3 ,
 distributed by *LUG)
 Prior to that Jamie gave me a SuSE 5.1 or 5.2 (?) at a LUG 'meeting' at
 Allann Bros on 5th Ave.
 Unfortunately, that CD was passed on to CRRC together with my old '486 )-:
 According to wikipedia 5.1 was released Nov 1997.

 Our web page should have a EugLUG history link !

  - Horst

 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:31:34 -0800
 From: Bob Miller k...@jogger-egg.com
 Reply-To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?

 What year would that have been?  I didn't find Eug-Lug
 until Feb., 2000, about a year before I moved here.
 The group seemed pretty young at the time, but
 who knows?

 ...
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?

2009-02-19 Thread Ben Barrett
Last I heard, Patrick was still around town.


On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, JS Kaplan kg...@hotmail.com wrote:


 Seth got married and moved to New Hampshire… I
 believe he's still following thru on that software dev project he was
 working with while he was here in Eugene…
 I know where Seth is and how to speak with him...what I wrote was:

 Hey, are there any wobblies around anymore? Particularly anyone who
 remembers Seth?

 That would *suggest *I'm looking to contact some wobblies, not some Seths.

 --Kaplan


 *Sentio aliquos togatos contra me conspirare.*
 (I think some people in togas are plotting against me.)
 Henry Beard http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Henry_Beard, *Latin for All
 Occasions*.





 --
 Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows
 Live. See Nowhttp://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093185mrt/direct/01/

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?

2009-02-19 Thread Ben Barrett
Chandler's in the south  east http://www.chrischandler.org/
but I suspect will be back for Fair (July).

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com wrote:

 Last I heard, Patrick was still around town.


 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, JS Kaplan kg...@hotmail.com wrote:


 Seth got married and moved to New Hampshire… I
 believe he's still following thru on that software dev project he was
 working with while he was here in Eugene…
 I know where Seth is and how to speak with him...what I wrote was:

 Hey, are there any wobblies around anymore? Particularly anyone who
 remembers Seth?

 That would *suggest *I'm looking to contact some wobblies, not some
 Seths.

 --Kaplan


 *Sentio aliquos togatos contra me conspirare.*
 (I think some people in togas are plotting against me.)
 Henry Beard http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Henry_Beard, *Latin for All
 Occasions*.





 --
 Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows
 Live. See Nowhttp://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093185mrt/direct/01/

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug



___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?

2009-02-19 Thread Ben Barrett
OT(?)  Is there a [strong] correlation between wobblies and hoedads?


On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.com wrote:

 Chandler's in the south  east http://www.chrischandler.org/
 but I suspect will be back for Fair (July).


 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Ben Barrett stircrazy...@gmail.comwrote:

 Last I heard, Patrick was still around town.


  On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:03 PM, JS Kaplan kg...@hotmail.com wrote:


 Seth got married and moved to New Hampshire… I
 believe he's still following thru on that software dev project he was
 working with while he was here in Eugene…
 I know where Seth is and how to speak with him...what I wrote was:

 Hey, are there any wobblies around anymore? Particularly anyone who
 remembers Seth?

 That would *suggest *I'm looking to contact some wobblies, not some
 Seths.

 --Kaplan


 *Sentio aliquos togatos contra me conspirare.*
 (I think some people in togas are plotting against me.)
 Henry Beard http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Henry_Beard, *Latin for All
 Occasions*.





 --
 Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone with Windows
 Live. See Nowhttp://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093185mrt/direct/01/

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug




___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?

2009-02-19 Thread Ben Barrett
Isn't that, S++ ?  ;)

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Darrough, James 
james.darro...@oregonstate.edu wrote:

 I have known Seth since the day we started Eug-Lug. Talk about the Dark
 Ages!

 Seth = good guy

 -Original Message-
 From: euglug-boun...@euglug.org [mailto:euglug-boun...@euglug.org] On
 Behalf Of Mr O
 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 4:39 PM
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group
 Subject: RE: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?

 Well there may be a long list of three letter acronyms...

 In other news, he did help me get accelerated 3D on my Geforce2MX back
 in the day of RedHat 7.3 and possibly Nvidia's first linux driver. It
 was quite the hack to make it work.

 Ah, the orange box! Currently still in Larry's possession.


 --- On Thu, 2/19/09, Matt Jarvis matt.jar...@kingrs.com wrote:

  From: Matt Jarvis matt.jar...@kingrs.com
  Subject: RE: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?
  To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
  Date: Thursday, February 19, 2009, 2:16 PM
   What ever happened to Seth?
 
 
 
  This would suggest that others around here know Seth, and
  some might be
  interested in his whereabouts
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Matt Jarvis
 
  Programmer/DBA
 
  King | Retail Solutions
 
  541-349-8512
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  From: euglug-boun...@euglug.org
  [mailto:euglug-boun...@euglug.org] On
  Behalf Of JS Kaplan
  Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 2:04 PM
  To: euglug@euglug.org
  Subject: [Eug-lug] Re: What ever happened to Seth?
 
 
 
 
 
  Seth got married and moved to New Hampshire... I
  believe he's still following thru on that software
  dev project he was
  working with while he was here in Eugene...
 
  I know where Seth is and how to speak with him...what I
  wrote was:
 
  Hey, are there any wobblies around anymore?
  Particularly anyone who
  remembers Seth?
 
  That would suggest I'm looking to contact some
  wobblies, not some Seths.
 
  --Kaplan
 
 
  Sentio aliquos togatos contra me conspirare.
  (I think some people in togas are plotting against me.)
  Henry Beard
  http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Henry_Beard , Latin for
  All
  Occasions.
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  Stay up to date on your PC, the Web, and your mobile phone
  with Windows
  Live. See Now
  http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/msnnkwxp1020093185mrt/direct/01/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any
  attachments, contains information that is, or may be,
  covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is
  also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not
  the intended recipient, please be advised that you are
  legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying,
  distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in
  any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you
  have received this communication in error, and then
  immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your
  cooperation.___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug



 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Ben I think you nailed it

2009-02-15 Thread Ben Barrett
You mean off-list, not off-line, I suppose.

As for this mailing list -- I think we'd have been banned.  It is common for
folks to ignore threads they're not into -- I ignore about 50% of euglug
threads these days!

Ben


On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:09 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:

 Am most grateful for all your thoughtful responses--and you've increased my
 understanding considerably.
 As for having done this offline, that's kinda how I thought it would go and
 why I suggested it in my first post. Hate to aggravate people here.
 Best,
 m

 Ben Barrett wrote:

 If you could be sure you were setting a static IP which was *outside* the
 range of addresses being handed out by the primary, that should work,
 however you don't know what the primary settings are, so I guess just
 experiment.  Now if your daily loss of connectivity is indeed due to a
 failure of the primary to renew the dhcp lease it gave to the secondary,
 setting static should avoid that problem, however who knows what other daily
 problems the primary router has?  It could be resetting due to power
 fluctuations on the same ciruit that kick on at that time each day, or
 possibly some other network traffic jams it up.  If you can, try to ensure
 that the primary device has its latest firmware (shouldn't be any need for
 custom firmware, just get the latest from the mfg).
 Well glad I could help.  From the looks of this thread's activity, we
 coulda done this offline, but maybe my explanations will help someone in the
 archives death to connection not found!

 Ben


 On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 9:00 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org mailto:
 mikem...@efn.org wrote:

Sweet.  Can't wait to try this in the morning (when my lease expires).

  ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Robotics Scrimmage tomorrow at CV

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
*Crescent* Valley... I think it is in Corvallis:
http://local.google.com/maps?f=qq=Crescent+Valley+High+School,+Oregon
http://local.google.com/maps?f=dsource=s_dsaddr=Eugene,+ORdaddr=Crescent+Valley+High+School,+Oregon

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Wes Morgan morg...@efn.org wrote:

 Is Willamette Valley High School the same as Willamette High School on Echo
 Hollow Road?

 Wes Morgan



 Allen Brown wrote:

 The Willamette Valley high school FIRST Robotics teams will
 be competing tomorrow. This event will be hosted at Crescent
 Valley High School in the cafeteria.

 Scrimmages are scheduled to run from 11AM-3PM.  In the past
 they have always started late, so you are probably safe to
 show up at 11:30.

 All of the area teams will be competing with each other.  In
 addition they will be battling their own internal challenges
 since all of the electronics and software is new as of this year.

 I plan to show up.  I have red hair and if I take my jacket off
 I will have amber suspenders.  I hope to see you all there!



 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] inside NextStep

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
 maybe he meant they have no business *paying* Microsoft ...
I'm guessing they get the same kinda $5 licenses St. Vinny's uses?
(microsoft does use linux and even causes open source of their own,
 not just open sores, heh)


On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Mr O notanathe...@yahoo.com wrote:

 I'm complaining because you're complaining about Microsoft and using a
 hotmail address.

 *tongue in cheek people!*


 --- On Sat, 2/14/09, JS Kaplan kg...@hotmail.com wrote:

  I'm complaining because I feel that my hours of labor
  are worth a tad bit more than a doorstop in which a
  full-sized PCI card
  won't fit and an AGP slot doesn't exist. I'm
  complaining because I feel
  that no matter what the cost, even free, a Microsoft
  license is a
  Microsoft license and a non-profit has no business
  purchasing Microsoft
  licenses when Open Source exists. When Ubuntu exists. If
  Ubuntu is good
  enough for IBM, it's good enough for every American.
 
  I'm complaining because I feel NextStep should be using
  Linux in every task from Office to Refurbishing. I'm
  complaining
  because I hate to see people thumping their chests in the
  Weekly.
  *Usually* if the Weekly has an overly positive take on
  something, it's
  called damage control or a pre-emptive Media Strike.

  James S. Kaplan
  kg...@hotmail.com
  currently under-employed
 
  Sic Semper TyrannisMarcus Junius Brutus, March
  15, 44 BC
 
  John Wilkes Booth, April 14, 1865 AD
 
 



 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] any dd-wrt users on the list?

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
I am -- just recently though.  I tried getting it running on a $25 on-sale
TrendNet model, which was close to models listed as supported/working, but I
guess not close enough (maybe future versions).  I decided to try the
Linksys WAP 54GL, and it was worth it -- although it did take a bit of
patience to go through two hard reset procedures and two firmware updates
(mini first).  I started with Client Bridge mode to extend my wifi to some
cat5 devices in an unattached garage, and have now gone to Repeater Bridge
mode, and think I'm staying there unless I see bandwidth issues.  I'm only
getting about 20% signal, so I've been futzing with antennae more than
dd-wrt!  ;)
http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Bridging

Ahem; why do you ask?

Ben

PS - I'm pretty sure that some of these devices with just enough horsepower
and a USB port (or USB headers) you can actually run then as a mini-PC, with
a display and everything!  There exists some linux USB display drivers,
right?  If not, I was thinking an old thin-client temrinal might be suitable
out there... but the MSI Wind (Atom) dekstop model is only $140 now, heh...


On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 10:45 AM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:

 Relating tangentially to a thread that weaves its way in'n out here
 periodically--trying to lick the high cost of broadband in you gene--I've
 finally got my Yagi up'n flying.  Any other Blank Regs operating in the
 area?

 (Though I've heard my router referred to as a solid state linux computer
 this is not technically a linux thread so to keep from taking up unfair
 width here on the list please respond privately).
___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] any dd-wrt users on the list?

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
Heh, that's a hardware issue.  You probably want to start out with a pair of
adapters so you can put a length of (rg5 or rg6, is it?) cable-tv type cable
as the extension.  The reception-oriented reasons you'd want to use DD-WRT
is enhanced control of transmit power as well as a slew of complex timing
options (these can help keep your wifi cloud small  contained, help it
reach further, or even help avoid some interference maybe).

If you can work out the yagi antenna placement and an extension or at least
adapter cable (depending on how far up a tree or the roof the antenna is!!),
then you can test the signal strength and fine-tune the antenna position as
a separate step from any DD-WRT or router setup.  Once the antenna will get
you your signal, then you can drop in a device in bridging mode, provided
that your uplink is copascetic and doesn't cut you off or sue you.  :)

Ben


On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:42 AM, BB bilbobag...@gmail.com wrote:

 I would like to know more about this for my blind friend, their out by LCC
 on a dial up.  Your saying you can tie to a YAGI antenna?  What's the
 range?  I know in their case there's a big hill in the way, but hey maybe
 they could tie to LCC or something, legit, of course.

 On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 10:45 AM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:

 Relating tangentially to a thread that weaves its way in'n out here
 periodically--trying to lick the high cost of broadband in you gene--I've
 finally got my Yagi up'n flying.  Any other Blank Regs operating in the
 area?

 (Though I've heard my router referred to as a solid state linux computer
 this is not technically a linux thread so to keep from taking up unfair
 width here on the list please respond privately).


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] any dd-wrt users on the list?

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
Well I'm not an expert on antenna cable lengths, surely you need some
low-gauge shielded wire, to make it any reasonable distance.

As for signals in the air belonging to you:  AFAIK, just because you're
allowed to use TCP/IP, doesn't mean you're allowed to abuse it :)  If you
borrow my signal, most uplink service providers consider it theft or at
least unfair use.  So even if you find a friendly neighbor willing to share,
you could be creating unwanted liability for yourself, should the lender get
shut down.
And just because you can speak SMTP and say you own the transmissions
containing my email, does not give you the right to read (use) that
transmission.  It is still eavesdropping, even on unlicensed spectrum, and
AFAIK (but IANAL) the laws and precedents are very clear about this.  So
sure, if my waves are in your airspace, I'm not going to lay claim to them,
but you're supposed to play nice with other people's privacy, in our open
society.

BTW, my Linksys model is a WTR-54GL, not the WAP one, but I am indeed using
it as a bridge -- I was slightly confused since the interface made it look
like I was creating another wlan with the same channel, SSID, and WPA2
password, but when in bridging mode this is merely used to connect.
Brainless and worh the ease of a supported device, in my case :)

Ben



On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:21 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:

 Have clearly plopped into a pond of serious users here so I won't pretend
 to advise--but from what I understand the cable (5606sr) from a Yagi can't
 be any longer than 8 ft or the signal turns to poop.

 Perhaps it's apropos to bring up the polotix of this issue, namely that any
 signal in the air is owned by anyone who can receive it. Transmitters
 beyond a certain wavelength and distance have to be licensed--but receivers
 still own the airways.

 Meantime would love to know how to fine-tune my Yagi position.  Do I need
 an oscilloscope or something?

 Fun,
 m

 Ben Barrett wrote:

 Heh, that's a hardware issue.  You probably want to start out with a pair
 of adapters so you can put a length of (rg5 or rg6, is it?) cable-tv type
 cable as the extension.  The reception-oriented reasons you'd want to use
 DD-WRT is enhanced control of transmit power as well as a slew of complex
 timing options (these can help keep your wifi cloud small  contained, help
 it reach further, or even help avoid some interference maybe).

 If you can work out the yagi antenna placement and an extension or at
 least adapter cable (depending on how far up a tree or the roof the antenna
 is!!), then you can test the signal strength and fine-tune the antenna
 position as a separate step from any DD-WRT or router setup.  Once the
 antenna will get you your signal, then you can drop in a device in bridging
 mode, provided that your uplink is copascetic and doesn't cut you off or sue
 you.  :)

  ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] any dd-wrt users on the list?

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
If you've got to do the 30-30-30 hard reset procedure daily, something is
VERY wrong.  The worst cases I've seen merely required a simple power-cycle,
which still interrupts most tcp sessions.

BTW, are you saying your device came with DD-WRT installed?  I've not seen
that -- even though the 54GL is linux-based, I am not using the stock
firmware (gasp).

Oh, and, yes, both my antennae are indoors, which is why I have 20% signal
strength (not 20% bandwdith)... I got a few more points by futzing around
with a semi-parabolic mesh screen (a round campfire-cover thing) placed as a
reflector to directionalize about 1/3 of the omni signal it could be
better, I might try a smaller deep-frying screen closer to the tip of the
antenna.  Only my remote (garage) bridge has this added, but I did raise my
indoor base station up onto the wall near the ceiling.  Both stations have
dual antennae, so I could replace one on each and put in a nice pair of
directional tin cans or proper yagis :)  Good enough for now... I'd still
like to see how Mr. House plays with ZoneMinder and X11 controls, and get my
circo-1930's house up to 1990's standards =P

Ben


On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 12:05 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:

 Ah so you're running a wireless access point; my setup is the straight
 wrt54gl box.  And I ask because I've been having to do the ole 30-30-30
 on the router every single day to keep a signal.  My suspicion is it's
 the source (bomcast) and its daily throttle drop-out.  The primary is a
 netgear -g (host is kool with this; we're neighbors).

 My thought was that once the secondary (my) router had been properly
 configured, all it should take to get back a lost signal is just reboot
 the router--but I have to start from scratch each time.  Do it
 practically in my sleep so it's no biggy--it just doesn't make sense
 that the simple reboot doesn't do the trick.

 You've no doubt found this forum and the peacock thread as useful as I:
 http://www.dd-wrt.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=39529.  That kat donny is a
 wonder.

 And that's kool you've got repeater bridge working; so far client bridge
 is the only setup I've been able successfully to run.  Perhaps it's that
 I've tried no other firmware than the one the router came flashed with,
 V24.  Sounds like you're running one of the newer sets. From what I've
 read wireless connections to repeater bridge do suffer considerable
 bandwidth reduction so maybe 20% is normal?

 If I may bug you further, is your antennae indoors?  I'm certain I could
 improve my signal if I mounted mine outdoors--it wouldn't have to pass
 through so many walls--but I've been too lazy to weatherize it.

 As for setting up my router as a mini-pc--perhaps in one of those
 parallel universes I keep reading about, one where there are more than
 just 24 hours in a day.

 Ben Barrett wrote:

 I am -- just recently though.  I tried getting it running on a $25 on-sale
 TrendNet model, which was close to models listed as supported/working, but I
 guess not close enough (maybe future versions).  I decided to try the
 Linksys WAP 54GL, and it was
 Ahem; why do you ask?


 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] any dd-wrt users on the list?

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
Okay:  I am indeed running DD-WRT in Repeater Bridge mode (my wifi cloud is
extended) on the new WRT54GL (my secondary).  My primary, in the home
office, is an older Linksys WRT54G, which now seems to think it is a 54GL
due to Linksys firmware, I forget if I got that from the UK site, DSLreports
thread here http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17758063

Now that I see just what I was missing, I'd like to get DD-WRT on my primary
too.

Oh, one thing I did in setting up the bridge, that I think I read afterward
was a good idea, was to get the client bridge setup  tested first, and then
just switch it to repeater bridge.  I had to power cycle the device (and my
primary) after that last switch, but haven't had to reset either so far
until now, I just adjusted a timing setting on my primary, and now need to
go reset the secondary again.  Now I just gotta figure out how many days the
little bridge and webcam can run off the UPS, heh!  :)

Oh, and fwiw, I never heard of doing the 30-30-30 when it comes to lockups,
without trying a power cycle first.  Power cycling is SO universal, most of
us have a handful of dsl modems we'd rather not remember...  Just unplug the
cable for 10 seconds or more, depending on your aura, then plug it back in.
Much much easier than the 30-30-30, which was the worst tech yoga I've had
to perform in years X^/

Ben




On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 1:11 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:



 Ben Barrett wrote:

 If you've got to do the 30-30-30 hard reset procedure daily, something is
 VERY wrong.  The worst cases I've seen merely required a simple power-cycle,
 which still interrupts most tcp sessions.

 That's what I think (very wrong).  By power-cycle you mean un/replugging
 the DC cable?  Ain't tried that yet.


 BTW, are you saying your device came with DD-WRT installed?  I've not seen
 that -- even though the 54GL is linux-based, I am not using the stock
 firmware (gasp).

 Yes, came with dd-wrt firmware already flashed.  Got it from JefaTech:
 http://www.jefatech.com/product/WRT54GL-DDWRT/WRT54GL_Wireless_Router_with_DDWRT.html.
 (Spent the extra 20 bux over market to get the one-year's support--though so
 far I've gotten more juice out of the ddwrt forums).


 Oh, and, yes, both my antennae are indoors, which is why I have 20% signal
 strength (not 20% bandwdith)... I got a few more points by futzing around
 with a semi-parabolic mesh screen (a round campfire-cover thing) placed as a
 reflector to directionalize about 1/3 of the omni signal it could be
 better, I might try a smaller deep-frying screen closer to the tip of the
 antenna.  Only my remote (garage) bridge has this added, but I did raise my
 indoor base station up onto the wall near the ceiling.  Both stations have
 dual antennae, so I could replace one on each and put in a nice pair of
 directional tin cans or proper yagis :)

  Was gonna try the cantenna thing--but found a Yagi for so cheap I couldn't
 resist.  Hope it's kosher to post a snap of wise old Doctor Yagi:

 [image: the man]

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Dr.HidetsuguYagi.jpg___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] any dd-wrt users on the list?

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
D'oh!  The first thing you need to do, if your [secondary] router is NOT
getting it's IP address via a DHCP lease from the primary, is set it to a
non-colliding address!  It should have the same netmask, unless you've
already got some routing plan in mind to over-ride the default bridging
(leave the rest alone) but the two routers should definately not have
the same IP on the same subnet -- no two devices ever should, shall I say
under normal circumstances.

Ben

PS - did I get thread-jacked too?  (...or aid  abet this jacked thread?)
I just reply to the most recent thread that interests me; I might've missed
some of the other dd-wrt thread(s), sorry if so.


On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 2:40 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:

 This all reminds me of another quirk in my setup--namely that I can NOT
 communicate with my own router (to check configuration) when the client
 bridge connection is working.  When I lose my internet connection, THEN I
 can log onto my router and get the dd-wrt config panels.
 Which means of course that I can't just switch to repeater bridge mode
 from client bridge. (Only way I can get to repeater bridge mode is to set it
 up from scratch, after a 30-30-30--and then it does not work).
 Have tried connecting to the default dd-wrt address of 192.168.1.1 while
 online--but I get my neighbor's (primary) router--which kinda feels like a
 major invasion of privacy and which I log off of instantly.  Hell I can even
 log into his printer--but I can't log into my own router when I'm online.

 Weird, huh?

 Ben Barrett wrote:

 Cool beans.  I used the latest stable DD-WRT firmware, v24-sp2 dated
 10/22/08, is what I'm using on the secondary.  I don't think the primary has
 to change any settings to get the secondary to go from client bridge to
 repeater bridge, but I think it might just have to give up the connection
 for a while (I power cycled my primary right away and got it on).  So you
 might try repeater bridge before you power cycle, if you have some time to
 hang around.  I don't know if it is an issue of the DHCP lease expiring from
 the primary (which is my only dhcp server on this lan, and which extends to
 the bridged network).  Make sure you're not just running out of leases (you
 might have connectivity but not get allocated a dhcp lease).

 Best of luck,

  ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] any dd-wrt users on the list?

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
Cool beans.  I used the latest stable DD-WRT firmware, v24-sp2 dated
10/22/08, is what I'm using on the secondary.  I don't think the primary has
to change any settings to get the secondary to go from client bridge to
repeater bridge, but I think it might just have to give up the connection
for a while (I power cycled my primary right away and got it on).  So you
might try repeater bridge before you power cycle, if you have some time to
hang around.  I don't know if it is an issue of the DHCP lease expiring from
the primary (which is my only dhcp server on this lan, and which extends to
the bridged network).  Make sure you're not just running out of leases (you
might have connectivity but not get allocated a dhcp lease).

Best of luck,

Ben

PS - futzing again here, noticed that a strainer behind my primary's antenna
gained me a few points of signal quality, and my SNR is hovering around
15-17, which should at least get me to the megabit level.  The noise is low
but the signal is also low (that is noise is -94, good, while signal is -78,
not so good).  I might just switch both away from channel 11:  various sites
around me *all* use channel 11 :)   IF I can bear to power cycle them both
again, laughs.



On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 2:02 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:



 Ben Barrett wrote:


 Oh, one thing I did in setting up the bridge, that I think I read
 afterward was a good idea, was to get the client bridge setup  tested
 first, and then just switch it to repeater bridge.  I had to power cycle the
 device (and my primary) after that last switch, but haven't had to reset
 either so far

 Yeah client bridge is the mode it's functioning in now and I did try that
 before attempting to switch to repeater bridge.  The primary router is one
 part of this system I've never futzed with as it's about 100 yards away
 under my neighbor's desk and my/his feeling is if it ain't broke don't fix
 it.  (Works fine for all the boxes in his network so I'm reticent to pull
 some trick that will make it work better on my end at the expense of messing
 up something on his).


 Oh, and fwiw, I never heard of doing the 30-30-30 when it comes to
 lockups, without trying a power cycle first.  Power cycling is SO universal,
 most of us have a handful of dsl modems we'd rather not remember...  Just
 unplug the cable for 10 seconds or more, depending on your aura, then plug
 it back in.  Much much easier than the 30-30-30, which was the worst tech
 yoga I've had to perform in years X^/

 Well the signal drop comes every 24 hours so it won't be long before I can
 try your power cycle advice
 And it ain't that I'm scared (much) of trying to upgrade my dd-wrt firmware
 to something fresher than V24--it's just that there are scores of them and
 they seem to change hourly.

 Thanx Ben,

 m

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] any dd-wrt users on the list?

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
Not sorry, just curious if the primary is at 192.168.5.1 and what level of
networking experience you've got :)

On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:

 OK I did that (reset my router to a unique address--namely 192.168.5.9) and
 as said when I'm NOT online--after I've lost my connection via client
 bridge--I can log into this address just fine and there's my router as I
 re-configured it after the hard reset.
 But while I'm ONline I can't communicate with it.  Should I assume there's
 another router/device nearby with that same address?  Wondered about this
 from the start--but also wondered if that were the case why I don't at least
 get a log in screen and request for name and password--but all I get is the
 network timeout screen with :  The server at 192.168.5.9 is taking too long
 to respond. (Over and over again).

 Am also thinking (have to do this from memory since I can NOT communicate
 with my router's config screen now) that I too am running V24 sp2 firmware.
 You sorry you responded to this thread, Ben?

 Thanx heaps,
 m


 Ben Barrett wrote:

 D'oh!  The first thing you need to do, if your [secondary] router is NOT
 getting it's IP address via a DHCP lease from the primary, is set it to a
 non-colliding address!  It should have the same netmask, unless you've
 already got some routing plan in mind to over-ride the default bridging
 (leave the rest alone) but the two routers should definately not have
 the same IP on the same subnet -- no two devices ever should, shall I say
 under normal circumstances.

 Ben

 PS - did I get thread-jacked too?  (...or aid  abet this jacked thread?)
   I just reply to the most recent thread that interests me; I might've
 missed some of the other dd-wrt thread(s), sorry if so.


 On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 2:40 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org mailto:
 mikem...@efn.org wrote:

This all reminds me of another quirk in my setup--namely that I
can NOT communicate with my own router (to check configuration)
when the client bridge connection is working.  When I lose my
internet connection, THEN I can log onto my router and get the
dd-wrt config panels.
Which means of course that I can't just switch to repeater
bridge mode from client bridge. (Only way I can get to repeater
bridge mode is to set it up from scratch, after a 30-30-30--and
then it does not work).
Have tried connecting to the default dd-wrt address of 192.168.1.1
while online--but I get my neighbor's (primary) router--which
kinda feels like a major invasion of privacy and which I log off
of instantly.  Hell I can even log into his printer--but I can't
log into my own router when I'm online.

Weird, huh?

  ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Ben I think you nailed it

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
Yeah, you might want to read up on some basic networking too :)  It could
certainly be tied to the dhcp lease, but those expiration times are a useful
thing, and the dhcp will auto-renew without any intervention under normal
conditions.

Good luck  rtfm :)



On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 3:41 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:

 ...with your mention of the DHCP lease.  These are good for just 24 hours
 and that is just the interval at which I lose my connection.

 My current lease began this morning at 9:29; if it all goes away again same
 time tomorrow, I'll know.

 Thanx,
 m
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] inside NextStep

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
Having a customized linux may seem like a good idea to you, but if they have
to hire you to support it, and you're the only one there who can support it,
then it is a horrible idea for the business.  They have to juggle a lot of
resources, and people are the hardest part.  I'm sure they'd appreciate
seeing your work if you really wanted to volunteer it, but since you're more
interested in the free-PC payoff, I doubt there's a trust-building
relationship there for you.  Why do we volunteer?

If as you suggest there is so much energy in refurbishing old PC's with
linux, then why isn't it happening?  Is it bad management?  Is it a lack of
understanding of linux?  Is it an inkling of just how much time we've seen
get sunk in compatibility and driver issues?

I don't think NextStep is necessarily going to be the #1 stop on a
EUGLUG'ers list, but I'm sure many of us will continue to appreciate and
support their presence in our community, whether we're busy trying to refurb
curbed equipment or shopping at walmart :)

One major difficulty I've seen with organizations that accept volunteer
efforts, is the management of volunteers overall -- this is a very difficult
task:  streamlining for the average volunteer  deciding how much
specialization to allow for, and ensuring a safe/proper amount of
oversight.  Making these decisions, as well as implementing them, cost an
organization a lot of resources!

Well I hope at least some of this perspective is useful.  In short, I say,
it's a free country so by all means, go ahead and [try to] do it better
yourself, and/or just keep exercising free speech in the meantime!!

Ben



On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 3:23 PM, JS Kaplan kg...@hotmail.com wrote:



  Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:40:08 -0800
  From: eug...@thebucks.net
  To: euglug@euglug.org
  Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] inside NextStep
 
 
  As Lorraine has said just about every time this subject has come up:
  They would like to offer more Linux options, but don't presently have
  the in-house knowledge and expertise to setup and coordinate a
  Linux-based build system.
  Perhaps your 40 hours of volunteer time could have been better spent if
  you are so passionate about the subject.

 Actually, I offered to streamline the puppy use for first cut in refurb. I
 offered to do a bunch of stuff.
 The person who would forward those offers up the food chain is more
 interested in, well let's just
 say he's not interested in someone (eg ME) who requires little to no
 training in certain areas.
 It's politics man plain and simple. I offered myself part-time at minimum
 wage and was waved off
 with no reason. So, the no in-house excuse doesn't hold water.

 ...it was 30 hours until a week or so ago.

 
  FYI: The Bottle Bill covers water and flavored water as of January 1.

 So, where do I get the stickers for the 857 plastics shipped after Jan 1 I
 have? As far as I know, you can only get them if your name is Coca-cola or
 Pepsi. You are working under the assumption that our bottle bill works.
 
  -ajb
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 --
 Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it 
 out.http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_explore_022009

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Ben I think you nailed it

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
If the netmask is set to 255.255.255.0, as is common, then you can only
change the last digit... to put it simply.
It would be pretty safe to assume the primary's netmask is indeed that, so
you'd do well to stay within the 192.168.1.* subnet,
at least between the bridge and the primary -- you could define your own
subnet and do dhcp for it on your secondary, bridge, device (at least on the
wired ports, I know).

And in case we still have other readers on this thread:  I found that dd-wrt
will work with vlans, and let you filter them, but the wlan is locked into a
single vlan from what I can tell.  I'm curious, but haven't tested trying to
see if a varying (say, rogue or just random) vlan tags get over-written by
dd-wrt or hardware when they route through the lan...  anyone tried that?

Thanks,

Ben


On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 5:32 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:

 If there's a handbook of basic networking I'd love to read it.  Every
 source on network principles I've tried so far quickly loses me and itself
 in geek speak--which I'm sure reads like esperanto to the initiated .  Am
 still on the hunt for a basic set of instructions--and meanwhile have
 learned more from gurus like yourself who are willing to offer advice than
 from anything I've managed to glean from the literature.
 (Setup so far is based on a literal following of the instruction primers in
 the dd-wrt wiki).

 Thanx Ben--and especially for the tip on the proper numbering of the IP
 address.  Someone else suggested the 192.168.5-something and I didn't know
 enough to realize this departs from the rule.
 m

 Ben Barrett wrote:

 Yeah, you might want to read up on some basic networking too :)  It could
 certainly be tied to the dhcp lease, but those expiration times are a useful
 thing, and the dhcp will auto-renew without any intervention under normal
 conditions.

 Good luck  rtfm :)


  ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] Ben I think you nailed it

2009-02-14 Thread Ben Barrett
If you could be sure you were setting a static IP which was *outside* the
range of addresses being handed out by the primary, that should work,
however you don't know what the primary settings are, so I guess just
experiment.  Now if your daily loss of connectivity is indeed due to a
failure of the primary to renew the dhcp lease it gave to the secondary,
setting static should avoid that problem, however who knows what other daily
problems the primary router has?  It could be resetting due to power
fluctuations on the same ciruit that kick on at that time each day, or
possibly some other network traffic jams it up.  If you can, try to ensure
that the primary device has its latest firmware (shouldn't be any need for
custom firmware, just get the latest from the mfg).
Well glad I could help.  From the looks of this thread's activity, we coulda
done this offline, but maybe my explanations will help someone in the
archives death to connection not found!

Ben


On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 9:00 PM, dooger watts mikem...@efn.org wrote:

 Sweet.  Can't wait to try this in the morning (when my lease expires).

 From what you describe it sounds as if my secondary IS getting its IP
 address automatically from the primary.  If I set the IP of the secondary to
 a static address of my own, would this lease thing go away--or open up a
 whole 'nother can of worms?

 Grateful, Ben,
 m

 Ben Barrett wrote:

 If the netmask is set to 255.255.255.0, as is common, then you can only
 change the last digit... to put it simply.
 It would be pretty safe to assume the primary's netmask is indeed that, so
 you'd do well to stay within the 192.168.1.* subnet,
 at least between the bridge and the primary -- you could define your own
 subnet and do dhcp for it on your secondary, bridge, device (at least on the
 wired ports, I know).

  ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] hello all, and a question about WoW....

2009-02-07 Thread Ben Barrett
Do they still offer more-recent (read:  commercial grade) code in the
CVS for free?
IIRC, when directx support was brewing, they had commercial-equivalent stuff for
free, for those who could deal with a cvs co and configure/make :)

Ben


On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Mr O notanathe...@yahoo.com wrote:
 You shouldn't *need* Cedega. From what I've heard WoW works quite well with 
 regular WINE. I tend to only play FPS games with linux clients. If I had time 
 I'd try to install WoW. Maybe on a meeting sometime.



 --- On Wed, 1/7/09, Gmail battleshipte...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Gmail battleshipte...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] hello all, and a question about WoW
 To: spencer carter spenc...@uoregon.edu, Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User 
 Group euglug@euglug.org
 Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 12:42 AM
 You need cedega at transgaming.com  it is a pay service I
 play wow and I got it to work just did not like paying.


 Sent from my iPod

 On Feb 7, 2009, at 3:18 AM, spencer carter
 spenc...@uoregon.edu wrote:

  First off hello to everyone! i would like to thank you
 all for your help in getting my machine up and runnin. for
 those who dont know me, lets jsut say im new to this hahaha
  so far i really like ubuntu, im running 8.10 and its
 great!!!
  one huge fall back is that i cannot play world of
 warcraft right now!!!  i have googled it and tried running
 the commands through vine and on terminal, and still no
 luck, i have tried the method of copying the entire
 installer cd onto desktop and then try to run that exe and
 still no luck. any ideas?
  ___
  EUGLUG mailing list
  euglug@euglug.org
  http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug



 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


Re: [Eug-lug] ls script help

2009-01-29 Thread Ben Barrett
If the file is mounted via FUSE, you can prolly get more control from
userland (ie, sans root)...

Ben


On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:17 PM, David Duncan ddun...@hexi.com wrote:
 You could change runlevel to single-user mode, or change it inside a
 virtual machine instance that thinks it's a different time, or tar
 it/bit fiddle the entry/untar it, or boot from a livecd/mount the
 harddisk/change time/touch, etc.

 On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 2:03 AM, horst ho...@freeshell.org wrote:
 I don't accept this as an aswer :-)
  My question was about arbitrarily changing the ctime of a file, or larger
 set of files. Down to the second, to the integer in the file stat structure.
 Like with touch with a time argument, or -r referenceFile.
 Like with touch and the -a or -m arguments -- I was asking for a -c
 argument!

 To achive that manually by changing the system time sounds like playing a
 video game, hit-and-miss. Plus other files may get stampd unintentionally
 during that period, and log entries may be created.

  - Horst

 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:39:43 -0800
 From: Alan eug...@thebucks.net
 Reply-To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 To: Eugene Unix and Gnu/Linux User Group euglug@euglug.org
 Subject: Re: [Eug-lug] ls script help

 Mike Cherba wrote:

 On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 00:17 -0800, Alan wrote:

 Which apparently doesn't change the ctime on linux.

 Yup.  Which is why you change the system time.  Ccime is maintained by
 the system for good reasons.



 I know I have used a *nix in the past 10 years in which touch could change
 the ctime. A bastardized version of SCO, maybe?
 It's now going to bug me until I figure it out.

 -ajb
 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

 ___
 EUGLUG mailing list
 euglug@euglug.org
 http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

___
EUGLUG mailing list
euglug@euglug.org
http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug


  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >