Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[Daniel Chenault]

I dunno about that but as it stands, like I said earlier, your connectors will 
only receive from internal addresses. 

> On Sep 4, 2014, at 16:21, "Michael B. Smith"  wrote:
> 
> This is way SBS does things.
> 
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> From: ccollins9
> Sent: ‎9/‎4/‎2014 7:10 PM
> To: exchange
> Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
> 
> U, is it me or are none of these connectors are set to receive from 
> 0.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255?  Going to be hard to receive email from the 
> internet if all your connectors can only receive from a 192.168 address, no?  
> You need to set a receive connector to ip range 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255 AND 
> permissions group 'anonymous'.  For example, here's my output from our 
> internet connector:
> 
> PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
> PipeliningEnabled: True
> ProtocolLoggingLevel   : None
> RemoteIPRanges  : 
> {::-:::::::, 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255}
> RequireEHLODomain   : False
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael B. Smith  
>> wrote:
>> You’ve got 3 receive connectors in your output. The first one doesn’t have 
>> AnonymousUsers set on it. You probably want it to. Especially if you are 
>> trying to, for example, accept non-authenticated email in the “Default 
>> WC-SBS1” connector from IP addresses in the range of 192-168.10.0/24.
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> [1]
>> 
>> PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers, 
>> ExchangeLegacyServers
>> 
>> RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.10.255-192.168.10.255, 
>> 192.168.10.0-192.168.10.253}
>> 
>> Name: Default WC-SBS1
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> [2]
>> 
>> PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
>> 
>> RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.11.0-255.255.255.255, 
>> 192.168.10.254-192.168.10.254, 0.0.0.0-192.168.9.255}
>> 
>> Name: Windows SBS Internet Receive 
>> WC-SBS1
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> [3]
>> 
>> PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers, ExchangeUsers
>> 
>> RemoteIPRanges  : {127.0.0.1-127.0.0.1}
>> 
>> Name: Windows SBS Fax Sharepoint Receive 
>> WC-SBS1
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
>> On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
>> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 5:47 PM
>> 
>> 
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
>>  
>> 
>> Ok
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I have tried the command
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Deleteing and recreating all connectors.
>> 
>> uninstalling and reinstlaling the hub transport role, and using windows SBS 
>> manager fix netowrk connectivity to rebuild the connectors
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> and still the same errors
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> I have ran the 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> get-receiveconnector |fl
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Here are the results
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> RunspaceId  : 
>> 70374003-32d5-4db1-a7f9-13e7c949b853
>> 
>> AuthMechanism   : Tls, Integrated, BasicAuth, 
>> BasicAuthRequireTLS, ExchangeServer
>> 
>> Banner  : 
>> 
>> BinaryMimeEnabled   : True
>> 
>> Bindings: {192.168.10.2:25}
>> 
>> ChunkingEnabled : True
>> 
>> DefaultDomain   : 
>> 
>> DeliveryStatusNotificationEnabled   : True
>> 
>> EightBitMimeEnabled : True
>> 
>> BareLinefeedRejectionEnabled: False
>> 
>> DomainSecureEnabled : False
>> 
>> EnhancedStatusCodesEnabled  : True
>> 
>> LongAddressesEnabled: False
>> 
>> OrarEnabled : False
>> 
>> SuppressXAnonymousTls   : False
>> 
>> AdvertiseClientSettings : False
>> 
>> Fqdn: WC-SBS1.wce.local
>> 
>> Comment : 
>> 
>> Enabled : True
>> 
>> ConnectionTimeout   : 00:10:00
>> 
>> ConnectionInactivityTimeout : 00:05:00
>> 
>> MessageRateLimit: unlimited
>> 
>> MessageRateSource   : IPAddress
>> 
>> MaxInboundConnection: 5000
>> 
>> MaxInboundConnectionPerSource   : unlimited
>> 
>> MaxInboundConnectionPercentagePerSource : 100
>> 
>> MaxHeaderSize   : 64 KB (65,536 bytes)
>> 
>> MaxHopCount : 60
>> 
>> MaxLocalHopCount: 12
>> 
>> MaxLogonFailures: 3
>> 
>> MaxMessageSize  : 10 MB (10,485,760 bytes)
>> 
>> MaxProtocolErrors   : 5
>> 
>> MaxR

Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[ccollins9]

Sorry!  missed your email, i see it now.


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Michael B. Smith 
wrote:

>  Yep. That was my point. :-)
>
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>  --
> From: ccollins9 
> Sent: 9/4/2014 7:40 PM
>
> To: exchange 
> Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
>
>  Got ya. But it still needs to be set to anonymous, no?
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Michael B. Smith 
> wrote:
>
>>  This is way SBS does things.
>>
>> Sent from my Windows Phone
>>  --
>> From: ccollins9 
>> Sent: 9/4/2014 7:10 PM
>>
>> To: exchange 
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
>>
>>   U, is it me or are none of these connectors are set to receive
>> from 0.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255?  Going to be hard to receive email from
>> the internet if all your connectors can only receive from a 192.168
>> address, no?  You need to set a receive connector to ip range
>> 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255 AND permissions group 'anonymous'.  For example,
>> here's my output from our internet connector:
>>
>>   PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
>> PipeliningEnabled: True
>> ProtocolLoggingLevel   : None
>>  RemoteIPRanges
>>  : {::-:::::::, 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255}
>> RequireEHLODomain   : False
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael B. Smith 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>  You've got 3 receive connectors in your output. The first one doesn't
>>> have AnonymousUsers set on it. You probably want it to. Especially if you
>>> are trying to, for example, accept non-authenticated email in the "Default
>>> WC-SBS1" connector from IP addresses in the range of 192-168.10.0/24.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>> PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers,
>>> ExchangeServers, ExchangeLegacyServers
>>>
>>> RemoteIPRanges  :
>>> {192.168.10.255-192.168.10.255, 192.168.10.0-192.168.10.253}
>>>
>>> Name: Default WC-SBS1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [2]
>>>
>>> PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
>>>
>>> RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.11.0-255.255.255.255,
>>> 192.168.10.254-192.168.10.254, 0.0.0.0-192.168.9.255}
>>>
>>> Name: Windows SBS Internet Receive
>>> WC-SBS1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [3]
>>>
>>> PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers, ExchangeUsers
>>>
>>> RemoteIPRanges  : {127.0.0.1-127.0.0.1}
>>>
>>> Name: Windows SBS Fax Sharepoint
>>> Receive WC-SBS1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
>>> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Graeme Carstairs
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 4, 2014 5:47 PM
>>>
>>> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have tried the command
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Deleteing and recreating all connectors.
>>>
>>> uninstalling and reinstlaling the hub transport role, and using windows
>>> SBS manager fix netowrk connectivity to rebuild the connectors
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> and still the same errors
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have ran the
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> get-receiveconnector |fl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here are the results
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> RunspaceId  :
>>> 70374003-32d5-4db1-a7f9-13e7c949b853
>>>
>>> AuthMechanism   : Tls, Integrated, BasicAuth,
>>> BasicAuthRequireTLS, ExchangeServer
>>>
>>> Banner  :
>>>
>>> BinaryMimeEnabled   : True
>>>
>>> Bindings: {192.168.10.2:25}
>>>
>>> ChunkingEnabled : True
>>>
>>> DefaultDomain   :
>>>
>>> DeliveryStatusNotificationEnabled   : True
>>>
>>> EightBitMimeEnabled : True
>>>
>>> BareLinefeedRejectionEnabled: False
>>>
>>> DomainSecureEnabled : False
>>>
>>> EnhancedStatusCodesEnabled  : True
>>>
>>> LongAddressesEnabled: False
>>>
>>> OrarEnabled : False
>>>
>>> SuppressXAnonymousTls   : False
>>>
>>> AdvertiseClientSettings : False
>>>
>>> Fqdn: WC-SBS1.wce.local
>>>
>>> Comment :
>>>
>>> Enabled : True
>>>
>>> ConnectionTimeout   : 00:10:00
>>>
>>> ConnectionInactivityTimeout : 00:05:00
>>>
>>> MessageRateLimit: unlimited
>>>
>>> MessageRateSource   : IPAddress
>>>
>>> MaxInboundConnection: 5000
>>>
>>> MaxInboundConnectionPerSource   : unlimited
>>>
>>> MaxInboundConnectionPercentagePerSource : 100
>>>
>>> MaxHead

RE: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[Michael B. Smith]

Yep. That was my point. :-)

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: ccollins9
Sent: ‎9/‎4/‎2014 7:40 PM
To: exchange
Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

Got ya. But it still needs to be set to anonymous, no?


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>> wrote:
This is way SBS does things.

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: ccollins9
Sent: 9/4/2014 7:10 PM
To: exchange

Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

U, is it me or are none of these connectors are set to receive from 0.0.0.0 
- 255.255.255.255?  Going to be hard to receive email from the internet if all 
your connectors can only receive from a 192.168 address, no?  You need to set a 
receive connector to ip range 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255 AND permissions group 
'anonymous'.  For example, here's my output from our internet connector:

PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
PipeliningEnabled: True
ProtocolLoggingLevel   : None
RemoteIPRanges  : 
{::-:::::::, 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255}
RequireEHLODomain   : False


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>> wrote:
You’ve got 3 receive connectors in your output. The first one doesn’t have 
AnonymousUsers set on it. You probably want it to. Especially if you are trying 
to, for example, accept non-authenticated email in the “Default WC-SBS1” 
connector from IP addresses in the range of 192-168.10.0/24.

[1]
PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers, 
ExchangeLegacyServers
RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.10.255-192.168.10.255, 
192.168.10.0-192.168.10.253}
Name: Default WC-SBS1

[2]
PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.11.0-255.255.255.255, 
192.168.10.254-192.168.10.254, 0.0.0.0-192.168.9.255}
Name: Windows SBS Internet Receive WC-SBS1

[3]
PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers, ExchangeUsers
RemoteIPRanges  : {127.0.0.1-127.0.0.1}
Name: Windows SBS Fax Sharepoint Receive 
WC-SBS1



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 5:47 PM

To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

Ok

I have tried the command

Deleteing and recreating all connectors.
uninstalling and reinstlaling the hub transport role, and using windows SBS 
manager fix netowrk connectivity to rebuild the connectors

and still the same errors

I have ran the

get-receiveconnector |fl

Here are the results




RunspaceId  : 70374003-32d5-4db1-a7f9-13e7c949b853
AuthMechanism   : Tls, Integrated, BasicAuth, 
BasicAuthRequireTLS, ExchangeServer
Banner  :
BinaryMimeEnabled   : True
Bindings: 
{192.168.10.2:25}
ChunkingEnabled : True
DefaultDomain   :
DeliveryStatusNotificationEnabled   : True
EightBitMimeEnabled : True
BareLinefeedRejectionEnabled: False
DomainSecureEnabled : False
EnhancedStatusCodesEnabled  : True
LongAddressesEnabled: False
OrarEnabled : False
SuppressXAnonymousTls   : False
AdvertiseClientSettings : False
Fqdn: WC-SBS1.wce.local
Comment :
Enabled : True
ConnectionTimeout   : 00:10:00
ConnectionInactivityTimeout : 00:05:00
MessageRateLimit: unlimited
MessageRateSource   : IPAddress
MaxInboundConnection: 5000
MaxInboundConnectionPerSource   : unlimited
MaxInboundConnectionPercentagePerSource : 100
MaxHeaderSize   : 64 KB (65,536 bytes)
MaxHopCount : 60
MaxLocalHopCount: 12
MaxLogonFailures: 3
MaxMessageSize  : 10 MB (10,485,760 bytes)
MaxProtocolErrors   : 5
MaxRecipientsPerMessage : 5000
PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers, 
Exchan

Re: [Exchange] Re: [NTSysADM] 2012 R2 HyperV

[Steve Ens]

Yes, use two hosts so you can cluster.
On Sep 4, 2014 6:31 PM, "Richard Stovall"  wrote:

> GIven the hardware you describe later in the thread, and some assumptions
> about the small size of your environment, I bet you can pretty much do
> whatever you want with the VMs.  You probably don't even need two hosts for
> anything besides uptime reasons.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Joseph Schvarcz 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m looking to setup 2 HyperV hosts and several servers on them.
>>
>> I’m looking at:
>>
>> 1-  File server
>>
>> 2-  SQL server, 2 of them
>>
>> 3-  2 domain controllers
>>
>> 4-  Terminal server
>>
>>
>>
>> I am thinking to split the SQL servers and maybe 1 domain controller on 1
>> host and the rest on the other.
>>
>> I wanted to get some feedback on how to setup the VHD’s? I know 2012R2
>> has VHDX now, where I am stuck is what kind to create?
>>
>> There is fixed and dynamic, do I want to use dynamic for the OS
>> partition, then fixed for data? or can I  use dynamic everywhere except for
>> the SQL data volumes?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
>

Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[ccollins9]

Got ya. But it still needs to be set to anonymous, no?


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Michael B. Smith 
wrote:

>  This is way SBS does things.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>  --
> From: ccollins9 
> Sent: 9/4/2014 7:10 PM
> To: exchange 
>
> Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
>
>  U, is it me or are none of these connectors are set to receive from 
> 0.0.0.0
> - 255.255.255.255?  Going to be hard to receive email from the internet if
> all your connectors can only receive from a 192.168 address, no?  You need
> to set a receive connector to ip range 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255 AND
> permissions group 'anonymous'.  For example, here's my output from our
> internet connector:
>
>  PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
> PipeliningEnabled: True
> ProtocolLoggingLevel   : None
> RemoteIPRanges
>  : {::-:::::::, 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255}
> RequireEHLODomain   : False
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael B. Smith 
> wrote:
>
>>  You've got 3 receive connectors in your output. The first one doesn't
>> have AnonymousUsers set on it. You probably want it to. Especially if you
>> are trying to, for example, accept non-authenticated email in the "Default
>> WC-SBS1" connector from IP addresses in the range of 192-168.10.0/24.
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers,
>> ExchangeLegacyServers
>>
>> RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.10.255-192.168.10.255,
>> 192.168.10.0-192.168.10.253}
>>
>> Name: Default WC-SBS1
>>
>>
>>
>> [2]
>>
>> PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
>>
>> RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.11.0-255.255.255.255,
>> 192.168.10.254-192.168.10.254, 0.0.0.0-192.168.9.255}
>>
>> Name: Windows SBS Internet Receive
>> WC-SBS1
>>
>>
>>
>> [3]
>>
>> PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers, ExchangeUsers
>>
>> RemoteIPRanges  : {127.0.0.1-127.0.0.1}
>>
>> Name: Windows SBS Fax Sharepoint
>> Receive WC-SBS1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
>> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Graeme Carstairs
>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 4, 2014 5:47 PM
>>
>> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
>>
>>
>>
>> Ok
>>
>>
>>
>> I have tried the command
>>
>>
>>
>> Deleteing and recreating all connectors.
>>
>> uninstalling and reinstlaling the hub transport role, and using windows
>> SBS manager fix netowrk connectivity to rebuild the connectors
>>
>>
>>
>> and still the same errors
>>
>>
>>
>> I have ran the
>>
>>
>>
>> get-receiveconnector |fl
>>
>>
>>
>> Here are the results
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> RunspaceId  :
>> 70374003-32d5-4db1-a7f9-13e7c949b853
>>
>> AuthMechanism   : Tls, Integrated, BasicAuth,
>> BasicAuthRequireTLS, ExchangeServer
>>
>> Banner  :
>>
>> BinaryMimeEnabled   : True
>>
>> Bindings: {192.168.10.2:25}
>>
>> ChunkingEnabled : True
>>
>> DefaultDomain   :
>>
>> DeliveryStatusNotificationEnabled   : True
>>
>> EightBitMimeEnabled : True
>>
>> BareLinefeedRejectionEnabled: False
>>
>> DomainSecureEnabled : False
>>
>> EnhancedStatusCodesEnabled  : True
>>
>> LongAddressesEnabled: False
>>
>> OrarEnabled : False
>>
>> SuppressXAnonymousTls   : False
>>
>> AdvertiseClientSettings : False
>>
>> Fqdn: WC-SBS1.wce.local
>>
>> Comment :
>>
>> Enabled : True
>>
>> ConnectionTimeout   : 00:10:00
>>
>> ConnectionInactivityTimeout : 00:05:00
>>
>> MessageRateLimit: unlimited
>>
>> MessageRateSource   : IPAddress
>>
>> MaxInboundConnection: 5000
>>
>> MaxInboundConnectionPerSource   : unlimited
>>
>> MaxInboundConnectionPercentagePerSource : 100
>>
>> MaxHeaderSize   : 64 KB (65,536 bytes)
>>
>> MaxHopCount : 60
>>
>> MaxLocalHopCount: 12
>>
>> MaxLogonFailures: 3
>>
>> MaxMessageSize  : 10 MB (10,485,760 bytes)
>>
>> MaxProtocolErrors   : 5
>>
>> MaxRecipientsPerMessage : 5000
>>
>> PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers,
>> ExchangeLegacyServers
>>
>> PipeliningEnab

RE: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[Michael B. Smith]

This is way SBS does things.

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: ccollins9
Sent: ‎9/‎4/‎2014 7:10 PM
To: exchange
Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

U, is it me or are none of these connectors are set to receive from 0.0.0.0 
- 255.255.255.255?  Going to be hard to receive email from the internet if all 
your connectors can only receive from a 192.168 address, no?  You need to set a 
receive connector to ip range 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255 AND permissions group 
'anonymous'.  For example, here's my output from our internet connector:

PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
PipeliningEnabled: True
ProtocolLoggingLevel   : None
RemoteIPRanges  : 
{::-:::::::, 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255}
RequireEHLODomain   : False


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael B. Smith 
mailto:mich...@smithcons.com>> wrote:
You’ve got 3 receive connectors in your output. The first one doesn’t have 
AnonymousUsers set on it. You probably want it to. Especially if you are trying 
to, for example, accept non-authenticated email in the “Default WC-SBS1” 
connector from IP addresses in the range of 192-168.10.0/24.

[1]
PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers, 
ExchangeLegacyServers
RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.10.255-192.168.10.255, 
192.168.10.0-192.168.10.253}
Name: Default WC-SBS1

[2]
PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.11.0-255.255.255.255, 
192.168.10.254-192.168.10.254, 0.0.0.0-192.168.9.255}
Name: Windows SBS Internet Receive WC-SBS1

[3]
PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers, ExchangeUsers
RemoteIPRanges  : {127.0.0.1-127.0.0.1}
Name: Windows SBS Fax Sharepoint Receive 
WC-SBS1



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 5:47 PM

To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

Ok

I have tried the command

Deleteing and recreating all connectors.
uninstalling and reinstlaling the hub transport role, and using windows SBS 
manager fix netowrk connectivity to rebuild the connectors

and still the same errors

I have ran the

get-receiveconnector |fl

Here are the results




RunspaceId  : 70374003-32d5-4db1-a7f9-13e7c949b853
AuthMechanism   : Tls, Integrated, BasicAuth, 
BasicAuthRequireTLS, ExchangeServer
Banner  :
BinaryMimeEnabled   : True
Bindings: 
{192.168.10.2:25}
ChunkingEnabled : True
DefaultDomain   :
DeliveryStatusNotificationEnabled   : True
EightBitMimeEnabled : True
BareLinefeedRejectionEnabled: False
DomainSecureEnabled : False
EnhancedStatusCodesEnabled  : True
LongAddressesEnabled: False
OrarEnabled : False
SuppressXAnonymousTls   : False
AdvertiseClientSettings : False
Fqdn: WC-SBS1.wce.local
Comment :
Enabled : True
ConnectionTimeout   : 00:10:00
ConnectionInactivityTimeout : 00:05:00
MessageRateLimit: unlimited
MessageRateSource   : IPAddress
MaxInboundConnection: 5000
MaxInboundConnectionPerSource   : unlimited
MaxInboundConnectionPercentagePerSource : 100
MaxHeaderSize   : 64 KB (65,536 bytes)
MaxHopCount : 60
MaxLocalHopCount: 12
MaxLogonFailures: 3
MaxMessageSize  : 10 MB (10,485,760 bytes)
MaxProtocolErrors   : 5
MaxRecipientsPerMessage : 5000
PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers, 
ExchangeLegacyServers
PipeliningEnabled   : True
ProtocolLoggingLevel: None
RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.10.255-192.168.10.255, 
192.168.10.0-192.168.10.253}
RequireEHLODomain   : False
RequireTLS  : False
EnableAuthGSSAPI: False
ExtendedProtectionPolicy: None
Live

Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[ccollins9]

U, is it me or are none of these connectors are set to receive from 0.0.0.0
- 255.255.255.255?  Going to be hard to receive email from the internet if
all your connectors can only receive from a 192.168 address, no?  You need
to set a receive connector to ip range 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255 AND
permissions group 'anonymous'.  For example, here's my output from our
internet connector:

PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
PipeliningEnabled: True
ProtocolLoggingLevel   : None
RemoteIPRanges
 : {::-:::::::, 0.0.0.0-255.255.255.255}
RequireEHLODomain   : False


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Michael B. Smith 
wrote:

>  You've got 3 receive connectors in your output. The first one doesn't
> have AnonymousUsers set on it. You probably want it to. Especially if you
> are trying to, for example, accept non-authenticated email in the "Default
> WC-SBS1" connector from IP addresses in the range of 192-168.10.0/24.
>
>
>
> [1]
>
> PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers,
> ExchangeLegacyServers
>
> RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.10.255-192.168.10.255,
> 192.168.10.0-192.168.10.253}
>
> Name: Default WC-SBS1
>
>
>
> [2]
>
> PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
>
> RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.11.0-255.255.255.255,
> 192.168.10.254-192.168.10.254, 0.0.0.0-192.168.9.255}
>
> Name: Windows SBS Internet Receive
> WC-SBS1
>
>
>
> [3]
>
> PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers, ExchangeUsers
>
> RemoteIPRanges  : {127.0.0.1-127.0.0.1}
>
> Name: Windows SBS Fax Sharepoint
> Receive WC-SBS1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *Graeme Carstairs
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 4, 2014 5:47 PM
>
> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
>
>
>
> Ok
>
>
>
> I have tried the command
>
>
>
> Deleteing and recreating all connectors.
>
> uninstalling and reinstlaling the hub transport role, and using windows
> SBS manager fix netowrk connectivity to rebuild the connectors
>
>
>
> and still the same errors
>
>
>
> I have ran the
>
>
>
> get-receiveconnector |fl
>
>
>
> Here are the results
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> RunspaceId  :
> 70374003-32d5-4db1-a7f9-13e7c949b853
>
> AuthMechanism   : Tls, Integrated, BasicAuth,
> BasicAuthRequireTLS, ExchangeServer
>
> Banner  :
>
> BinaryMimeEnabled   : True
>
> Bindings: {192.168.10.2:25}
>
> ChunkingEnabled : True
>
> DefaultDomain   :
>
> DeliveryStatusNotificationEnabled   : True
>
> EightBitMimeEnabled : True
>
> BareLinefeedRejectionEnabled: False
>
> DomainSecureEnabled : False
>
> EnhancedStatusCodesEnabled  : True
>
> LongAddressesEnabled: False
>
> OrarEnabled : False
>
> SuppressXAnonymousTls   : False
>
> AdvertiseClientSettings : False
>
> Fqdn: WC-SBS1.wce.local
>
> Comment :
>
> Enabled : True
>
> ConnectionTimeout   : 00:10:00
>
> ConnectionInactivityTimeout : 00:05:00
>
> MessageRateLimit: unlimited
>
> MessageRateSource   : IPAddress
>
> MaxInboundConnection: 5000
>
> MaxInboundConnectionPerSource   : unlimited
>
> MaxInboundConnectionPercentagePerSource : 100
>
> MaxHeaderSize   : 64 KB (65,536 bytes)
>
> MaxHopCount : 60
>
> MaxLocalHopCount: 12
>
> MaxLogonFailures: 3
>
> MaxMessageSize  : 10 MB (10,485,760 bytes)
>
> MaxProtocolErrors   : 5
>
> MaxRecipientsPerMessage : 5000
>
> PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers,
> ExchangeLegacyServers
>
> PipeliningEnabled   : True
>
> ProtocolLoggingLevel: None
>
> RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.10.255-192.168.10.255,
> 192.168.10.0-192.168.10.253}
>
> RequireEHLODomain   : False
>
> RequireTLS  : False
>
> EnableAuthGSSAPI: False
>
> ExtendedProtectionPolicy: None
>
> LiveCredentialEnabled   : False
>
> TlsDomainCapabilities   : {}
>
> Server

Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

[Kurt Buff]

No, more like a blivet...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blivet#Military_usage

Kurt

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Damien Solodow
 wrote:
> Wouldn't it be like putting a portable hole in a bag of holding?
>
> DAMIEN SOLODOW
> Systems Engineer
> 317.447.6033 (office)
> 317.447.6014 (fax)
> HARRISON COLLEGE
>
> -Original Message-
> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
> On Behalf Of Tim Evans
> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 2:33 PM
> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>
> Wouldn't it be great if Symantec acquired CA or vice versa?
>
> …Tim
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
> On Behalf Of Kurt Buff
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:03 AM
> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>
> Between them and CA...
>
> Kurt
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:52 AM, William Robbins  wrote:
>> (just acquired by Symantec)…
>>
>> And so dies another good product. :'(
>>
>>
>> - WJR
>> 🙈🙉🙊
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Kuskie, Troy  wrote:
>>>
>>> We also use TouchDown (just acquired by Symantec)… but I wanted to
>>> mention that on the Play & iTunes stores Microsoft has released an official 
>>> OWA App.
>>> I believe the Droid version is still beta but the iOS version works well.
>>> However, I don’t think they support the “Notes” feature but they tie
>>> natively into an Exchange organization and they are tight and require
>>> little overhead and are similar to the Windows 8 Metro Mail App plus they 
>>> are free!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 6:51 AM
>>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>> Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook
>>> notes)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting thread, glad I asked!
>>>
>>> Thanks all for your input.
>>>
>>> -Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:39 PM
>>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>> Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook
>>> notes)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> iOS 4.2 was certified. J
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No version of Android was ever certified.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:28 PM
>>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook
>>> notes)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sure, Apple does well with ActiveSync. Until it doesn’t.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Michael B. Smith
>>>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 6:10 PM
>>>
>>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>>
>>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook
>>> notes)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would suggest that Android doesn’t play well with ActiveSync. The
>>> specifications are published and quite definitive.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Apple and Touchdown and Windows Phone and certain versions of Android
>>> deal with ActiveSync very well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Notes – they are another issue entirely.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:43 PM
>>> To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
>>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook
>>> notes)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We went with the Touchdown app primarily because ActiveSync didn’t
>>> play nicely with Android.  Also, we needed to have the notes available as 
>>> well.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:39 PM
>>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook
>>> notes)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the quick reply.
>>>
>>> So, is the lack of “Notes” being including in native ActiveSync on
>>> Android the reason you went with Touchdown?
>>>
>>> Or were there other factors?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:28 PM
>>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook
>>> notes)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We are running a mix of Galaxy S3’s and S5’s and we have those
>>> interface using an app called Touchdown for Smartphones.  This app
>>> uses the activesync with our Exchange 2010 server to send emails,
>>> notes, tasks, calendar, contacts, etc to the phone and vice

RE: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[Michael B. Smith]

You’ve got 3 receive connectors in your output. The first one doesn’t have 
AnonymousUsers set on it. You probably want it to. Especially if you are trying 
to, for example, accept non-authenticated email in the “Default WC-SBS1” 
connector from IP addresses in the range of 192-168.10.0/24.

[1]
PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers, 
ExchangeLegacyServers
RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.10.255-192.168.10.255, 
192.168.10.0-192.168.10.253}
Name: Default WC-SBS1

[2]
PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers
RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.11.0-255.255.255.255, 
192.168.10.254-192.168.10.254, 0.0.0.0-192.168.9.255}
Name: Windows SBS Internet Receive WC-SBS1

[3]
PermissionGroups: AnonymousUsers, ExchangeUsers
RemoteIPRanges  : {127.0.0.1-127.0.0.1}
Name: Windows SBS Fax Sharepoint Receive 
WC-SBS1



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 5:47 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

Ok

I have tried the command

Deleteing and recreating all connectors.
uninstalling and reinstlaling the hub transport role, and using windows SBS 
manager fix netowrk connectivity to rebuild the connectors

and still the same errors

I have ran the

get-receiveconnector |fl

Here are the results




RunspaceId  : 70374003-32d5-4db1-a7f9-13e7c949b853
AuthMechanism   : Tls, Integrated, BasicAuth, 
BasicAuthRequireTLS, ExchangeServer
Banner  :
BinaryMimeEnabled   : True
Bindings: 
{192.168.10.2:25}
ChunkingEnabled : True
DefaultDomain   :
DeliveryStatusNotificationEnabled   : True
EightBitMimeEnabled : True
BareLinefeedRejectionEnabled: False
DomainSecureEnabled : False
EnhancedStatusCodesEnabled  : True
LongAddressesEnabled: False
OrarEnabled : False
SuppressXAnonymousTls   : False
AdvertiseClientSettings : False
Fqdn: WC-SBS1.wce.local
Comment :
Enabled : True
ConnectionTimeout   : 00:10:00
ConnectionInactivityTimeout : 00:05:00
MessageRateLimit: unlimited
MessageRateSource   : IPAddress
MaxInboundConnection: 5000
MaxInboundConnectionPerSource   : unlimited
MaxInboundConnectionPercentagePerSource : 100
MaxHeaderSize   : 64 KB (65,536 bytes)
MaxHopCount : 60
MaxLocalHopCount: 12
MaxLogonFailures: 3
MaxMessageSize  : 10 MB (10,485,760 bytes)
MaxProtocolErrors   : 5
MaxRecipientsPerMessage : 5000
PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers, 
ExchangeLegacyServers
PipeliningEnabled   : True
ProtocolLoggingLevel: None
RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.10.255-192.168.10.255, 
192.168.10.0-192.168.10.253}
RequireEHLODomain   : False
RequireTLS  : False
EnableAuthGSSAPI: False
ExtendedProtectionPolicy: None
LiveCredentialEnabled   : False
TlsDomainCapabilities   : {}
Server  : WC-SBS1
SizeEnabled : EnabledWithoutValue
TarpitInterval  : 00:00:05
MaxAcknowledgementDelay : 00:00:30
AdminDisplayName:
ExchangeVersion : 0.1 (8.0.535.0)
Name: Default WC-SBS1
DistinguishedName   : CN=Default WC-SBS1,CN=SMTP Receive 
Connectors,CN=Protocols,CN=WC-SBS1,CN=Serv
  ers,CN=Exchange Administrative Group 
(FYDIBOHF23SPDLT),CN=Administrative Grou
  ps,CN=First Organization,CN=Microsoft 
Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,D
  C=wce,DC=local
Identity: WC-SBS1\Default WC-SBS1
Guid: faeddf10-bbfd-41a1-af70-22523d342be8
ObjectCategory  : 
wce.local/Configuration/Schema/ms-Exch-Smtp-Receive-Connector
ObjectClass : {top, 

Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[Daniel Chenault]

RemoteIPRAnges = those IPs allowed to send I to this connector. 

> On Sep 4, 2014, at 14:47, "Graeme Carstairs"  wrote:
> 
> Ok
> 
> I have tried the command
> 
> Deleteing and recreating all connectors.
> uninstalling and reinstlaling the hub transport role, and using windows SBS 
> manager fix netowrk connectivity to rebuild the connectors
> 
> and still the same errors
> 
> I have ran the 
> 
> get-receiveconnector |fl
> 
> Here are the results
> 
> 
> 
> 
> RunspaceId  : 70374003-32d5-4db1-a7f9-13e7c949b853
> AuthMechanism   : Tls, Integrated, BasicAuth, 
> BasicAuthRequireTLS, ExchangeServer
> Banner  : 
> BinaryMimeEnabled   : True
> Bindings: {192.168.10.2:25}
> ChunkingEnabled : True
> DefaultDomain   : 
> DeliveryStatusNotificationEnabled   : True
> EightBitMimeEnabled : True
> BareLinefeedRejectionEnabled: False
> DomainSecureEnabled : False
> EnhancedStatusCodesEnabled  : True
> LongAddressesEnabled: False
> OrarEnabled : False
> SuppressXAnonymousTls   : False
> AdvertiseClientSettings : False
> Fqdn: WC-SBS1.wce.local
> Comment : 
> Enabled : True
> ConnectionTimeout   : 00:10:00
> ConnectionInactivityTimeout : 00:05:00
> MessageRateLimit: unlimited
> MessageRateSource   : IPAddress
> MaxInboundConnection: 5000
> MaxInboundConnectionPerSource   : unlimited
> MaxInboundConnectionPercentagePerSource : 100
> MaxHeaderSize   : 64 KB (65,536 bytes)
> MaxHopCount : 60
> MaxLocalHopCount: 12
> MaxLogonFailures: 3
> MaxMessageSize  : 10 MB (10,485,760 bytes)
> MaxProtocolErrors   : 5
> MaxRecipientsPerMessage : 5000
> PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers, 
> ExchangeLegacyServers
> PipeliningEnabled   : True
> ProtocolLoggingLevel: None
> RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.10.255-192.168.10.255, 
> 192.168.10.0-192.168.10.253}
> RequireEHLODomain   : False
> RequireTLS  : False
> EnableAuthGSSAPI: False
> ExtendedProtectionPolicy: None
> LiveCredentialEnabled   : False
> TlsDomainCapabilities   : {}
> Server  : WC-SBS1
> SizeEnabled : EnabledWithoutValue
> TarpitInterval  : 00:00:05
> MaxAcknowledgementDelay : 00:00:30
> AdminDisplayName: 
> ExchangeVersion : 0.1 (8.0.535.0)
> Name: Default WC-SBS1
> DistinguishedName   : CN=Default WC-SBS1,CN=SMTP Receive 
> Connectors,CN=Protocols,CN=WC-SBS1,CN=Serv
>   ers,CN=Exchange Administrative 
> Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT),CN=Administrative Grou
>   ps,CN=First 
> Organization,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,D
>   C=wce,DC=local
> Identity: WC-SBS1\Default WC-SBS1
> Guid: faeddf10-bbfd-41a1-af70-22523d342be8
> ObjectCategory  : 
> wce.local/Configuration/Schema/ms-Exch-Smtp-Receive-Connector
> ObjectClass : {top, msExchSmtpReceiveConnector}
> WhenChanged : 04/09/2014 22:36:36
> WhenCreated : 04/09/2014 22:26:20
> WhenChangedUTC  : 04/09/2014 21:36:36
> WhenCreatedUTC  : 04/09/2014 21:26:20
> OrganizationId  : 
> OriginatingServer   : WC-SBS1.wce.local
> IsValid : True
> 
> RunspaceId  : 70374003-32d5-4db1-a7f9-13e7c949b853
> AuthMechanism   : Tls
> Banner  : 
> BinaryMimeEnabled   : True
> Bindings: {192.168.10.2:25}
> ChunkingEnabled : True
> DefaultDomain   : 
> DeliveryStatusNotificationEnabled   : True
> EightBitMimeEnabled : True
> BareLinefeedRejectionEnabled: False
> DomainSecureEnabled : False
> E

Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[Graeme Carstairs]

Ok

I have tried the command

Deleteing and recreating all connectors.
uninstalling and reinstlaling the hub transport role, and using windows SBS
manager fix netowrk connectivity to rebuild the connectors

and still the same errors

I have ran the

get-receiveconnector |fl

Here are the results




RunspaceId  :
70374003-32d5-4db1-a7f9-13e7c949b853
AuthMechanism   : Tls, Integrated, BasicAuth,
BasicAuthRequireTLS, ExchangeServer
Banner  :
BinaryMimeEnabled   : True
Bindings: {192.168.10.2:25}
ChunkingEnabled : True
DefaultDomain   :
DeliveryStatusNotificationEnabled   : True
EightBitMimeEnabled : True
BareLinefeedRejectionEnabled: False
DomainSecureEnabled : False
EnhancedStatusCodesEnabled  : True
LongAddressesEnabled: False
OrarEnabled : False
SuppressXAnonymousTls   : False
AdvertiseClientSettings : False
Fqdn: WC-SBS1.wce.local
Comment :
Enabled : True
ConnectionTimeout   : 00:10:00
ConnectionInactivityTimeout : 00:05:00
MessageRateLimit: unlimited
MessageRateSource   : IPAddress
MaxInboundConnection: 5000
MaxInboundConnectionPerSource   : unlimited
MaxInboundConnectionPercentagePerSource : 100
MaxHeaderSize   : 64 KB (65,536 bytes)
MaxHopCount : 60
MaxLocalHopCount: 12
MaxLogonFailures: 3
MaxMessageSize  : 10 MB (10,485,760 bytes)
MaxProtocolErrors   : 5
MaxRecipientsPerMessage : 5000
PermissionGroups: ExchangeUsers, ExchangeServers,
ExchangeLegacyServers
PipeliningEnabled   : True
ProtocolLoggingLevel: None
RemoteIPRanges  : {192.168.10.255-192.168.10.255,
192.168.10.0-192.168.10.253}
RequireEHLODomain   : False
RequireTLS  : False
EnableAuthGSSAPI: False
ExtendedProtectionPolicy: None
LiveCredentialEnabled   : False
TlsDomainCapabilities   : {}
Server  : WC-SBS1
SizeEnabled : EnabledWithoutValue
TarpitInterval  : 00:00:05
MaxAcknowledgementDelay : 00:00:30
AdminDisplayName:
ExchangeVersion : 0.1 (8.0.535.0)
Name: Default WC-SBS1
DistinguishedName   : CN=Default WC-SBS1,CN=SMTP
Receive Connectors,CN=Protocols,CN=WC-SBS1,CN=Serv
  ers,CN=Exchange Administrative
Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT),CN=Administrative Grou
  ps,CN=First
Organization,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,D
  C=wce,DC=local
Identity: WC-SBS1\Default WC-SBS1
Guid:
faeddf10-bbfd-41a1-af70-22523d342be8
ObjectCategory  :
wce.local/Configuration/Schema/ms-Exch-Smtp-Receive-Connector
ObjectClass : {top, msExchSmtpReceiveConnector}
WhenChanged : 04/09/2014 22:36:36
WhenCreated : 04/09/2014 22:26:20
WhenChangedUTC  : 04/09/2014 21:36:36
WhenCreatedUTC  : 04/09/2014 21:26:20
OrganizationId  :
OriginatingServer   : WC-SBS1.wce.local
IsValid : True

RunspaceId  :
70374003-32d5-4db1-a7f9-13e7c949b853
AuthMechanism   : Tls
Banner  :
BinaryMimeEnabled   : True
Bindings: {192.168.10.2:25}
ChunkingEnabled : True
DefaultDomain   :
DeliveryStatusNotificationEnabled   : True
EightBitMimeEnabled : True
BareLinefeedRejectionEnabled: False
DomainSecureEnabled : False
EnhancedStatusCodesEnabled  : True
LongAddressesEnabled: False
OrarEnabled : False
SuppressXAnonymousTls   : False
AdvertiseClientSettings : False
Fqdn: webmail.domain.com
Comment :
Enabled

RE: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[Michael B. Smith]

I would personally also look at the ExtendedRights present on the connector. :)

But the OP seemed to just want the solution

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 5:13 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

I would do
get-receiveconnector "" | fl
first to see if the mystery could be explained. Wouldn't be the first time the 
GUI lied.

But your set-receiveconnector line is perfectly fine and should force the issue.

From: mich...@smithcons.com
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 21:05:19 +
Set-ReceiveConnector -Name "" -Server  
-PermissionGroups 
AnonymousUsers,ExchangeUsers,ExchangeServers,ExchangeLegacyServers


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 3:57 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

Sorry i will clarify, the receive connector is set to receive from IPS 0.0.0.0 
- 255.255.255.255


Authentication is set to basic, and anonymous allowed.

Yet still get no permissions

Graeme
or



On 4 September 2014 17:41, Daniel Chenault 
mailto:dani...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Your question is not clear. "Apparently" configured - it either is or it isn't. 
If it is set to accept from a specific IP the condition you state is expected 
behavior. Could you clarify please?

Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:27:46 +0100
Subject: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
From: loonyto...@gmail.com
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com

An Exchange 2010 server receive connector though apparently configured to 
accept e-mail from an ip is rejecting e-mail from every ip with the error

550 5.7.1 External client with ip address does not have permissions to submit 
to this server.

I have compared with other internet receive connectors and it is set the same.

Google seems to only bring up issues between hub and edge servers, this is a 
multi role single server setup.

Thanks

Graeme


--
Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!



--
Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!

RE: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[Daniel Chenault]

I would do 
get-receiveconnector "" | fl
first to see if the mystery could be explained. Wouldn't be the first time the 
GUI lied.

But your set-receiveconnector line is perfectly fine and should force the issue.

From: mich...@smithcons.com
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 21:05:19 +









Set-ReceiveConnector -Name "" -Server  
-PermissionGroups 
AnonymousUsers,ExchangeUsers,ExchangeServers,ExchangeLegacyServers
 
 
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs

Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 3:57 PM

To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com

Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
 

Sorry i will clarify, the receive connector is set to receive from IPS 0.0.0.0 
- 255.255.255.255

 

 


Authentication is set to basic, and anonymous allowed.


 


Yet still get no permissions


 


Graeme


or

 


 





 

On 4 September 2014 17:41, Daniel Chenault  wrote:


Your question is not clear. "Apparently" configured - it either is or it isn't. 
If it is set to accept from a specific IP the condition you state is expected 
behavior. Could you clarify please?




Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:27:46 +0100

Subject: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

From: loonyto...@gmail.com

To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com


 

An Exchange 2010 server receive connector though apparently configured to 
accept e-mail from an ip is rejecting e-mail from every ip with the error

 


550 5.7.1 External client with ip address does not have permissions to submit 
to this server.


 


I have compared with other internet receive connectors and it is set the same.


 


Google seems to only bring up issues between hub and edge servers, this is a 
multi role single server setup.


 


Thanks


 


Graeme





 

-- 

Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me! 













 

-- 

Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me! 

  

RE: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[Michael B. Smith]

Set-ReceiveConnector -Name "" -Server  
-PermissionGroups 
AnonymousUsers,ExchangeUsers,ExchangeServers,ExchangeLegacyServers


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 3:57 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

Sorry i will clarify, the receive connector is set to receive from IPS 0.0.0.0 
- 255.255.255.255


Authentication is set to basic, and anonymous allowed.

Yet still get no permissions

Graeme
or



On 4 September 2014 17:41, Daniel Chenault 
mailto:dani...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Your question is not clear. "Apparently" configured - it either is or it isn't. 
If it is set to accept from a specific IP the condition you state is expected 
behavior. Could you clarify please?

Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:27:46 +0100
Subject: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
From: loonyto...@gmail.com
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com

An Exchange 2010 server receive connector though apparently configured to 
accept e-mail from an ip is rejecting e-mail from every ip with the error

550 5.7.1 External client with ip address does not have permissions to submit 
to this server.

I have compared with other internet receive connectors and it is set the same.

Google seems to only bring up issues between hub and edge servers, this is a 
multi role single server setup.

Thanks

Graeme


--
Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!



--
Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!

Re: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[Graeme Carstairs]

Sorry i will clarify, the receive connector is set to receive from IPS
0.0.0.0 - 255.255.255.255


Authentication is set to basic, and anonymous allowed.

Yet still get no permissions

Graeme





On 4 September 2014 17:41, Daniel Chenault  wrote:

> Your question is not clear. "Apparently" configured - it either is or it
> isn't. If it is set to accept from a specific IP the condition you state is
> expected behavior. Could you clarify please?
>
> --
> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:27:46 +0100
> Subject: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
> From: loonyto...@gmail.com
> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>
>
> An Exchange 2010 server receive connector though apparently configured to
> accept e-mail from an ip is rejecting e-mail from every ip with the error
>
> 550 5.7.1 External client with ip address does not have permissions to
> submit to this server.
>
> I have compared with other internet receive connectors and it is set the
> same.
>
> Google seems to only bring up issues between hub and edge servers, this is
> a multi role single server setup.
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> --
> Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!
>



-- 
Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!

[Exchange] Trend Cloud Pre-Filtering Service

[Adm]

Anyone out there using this service?
I'm looking for satisfied or unsatisfied customers and their reviews

Thx in advance

-- 
smsadm

RE: PSS ughhh[Exchange] DB is mandatory on usermailbox / autodiscover fail

[J- P]

So after all the articles and tips and what not , I open a ticket with PSS 
(they really should re-think that "P" in the title)

They are doing everything I told them I did, (going on 4 hrs now), then she 
comes back with it seems to be permissions, so i said hmmm lets create a new 
domain admin/exchange admin - and sure enough made no difference.

and now I get the "i'm researching this , please take a break to get something 
to eat, really??"

so i guess I will be watching this remote session for a few more hours (if i'm 
lucky)










> From: jnat...@hotmail.com 
> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com 
> Subject: RE: [Exchange] DB is mandatory on usermailbox / autodiscover fail 
> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:01:10 -0400 
>  
> running 2010/2013 
>  
> the address resolves from outside,  the functionality  is what fails 
>  
> ping autodiscover.domain.com 
> pinging  xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 
>  
> so it knows where to go, it just does work when it gets there 
>  
>  
> Jean-Paul Natola 
>  
>  
>  
> > Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:47:40 -0700 
> > From: sbrad...@pacbell.net 
> > To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com 
> > Subject: Re: [Exchange] DB is mandatory on usermailbox / autodiscover fail 
> > 
> > A new feature is available that enables Outlook 2007 to use DNS Service 
> > Location (SRV) records to locate the Exchange Autodiscover service: 
> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940881/en-us 
> > 
> > 
> > Excra is testing from the outside. I don't see how this is resolving if 
> > Excra can't find it either? 
> > 
> > Susan Bradley 
> > Still migrating the msmvps.com blogs but we're getting closer. 
> > blogs.msmvps.com/bradley is the new url and redirects are in place 
> > Have I mentioned how much migrations are REALLY painful? 
> > 
> > On 9/2/2014 3:41 PM, J- P wrote: 
> >> "Is your autodiscover setting up at the dns settings of your hoster?' 
> >> 
> >> not sure I understood the q, 
> >> Hoster has autodiscover.domain.com published and it DOES resolve from 
> >> outside, it just fails ExCra testing, 
> >> internally autodiscover.domain.com doesnt resolve (w2k8 DNS server) 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 15:35:00 -0700 
> >>> From: sbrad...@pacbell.net 
> >>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com 
> >>> Subject: Re: [Exchange] DB is mandatory on usermailbox / 
> >> autodiscover fail 
> >>> 
> >>> Is your autodiscover setting up at the dns settings of your hoster? 
> >>> 
> >>> That's where the value is set up for me, I'd start there and check that 
> >>> something hasn't happened there first. 
> >>> 
> >>> Start with the basics. 
> >>> 
> >>> On 9/2/2014 3:24 PM, J- P wrote: 
>  Now i'm wondering if autodiscover is not working because of the DB 
>  mandatory error, or vice versa 
>  
>  
>  Jean-Paul Natola 
>  
>  
>  
>  
> >>  
>  From: dani...@hotmail.com 
>  To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com 
>  Subject: RE: [Exchange] DB is mandatory on usermailbox / 
> >> autodiscover fail 
>  Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:18:25 -0500 
>  
>  I seem to recall troubleshooting something similar and found at the 
>  time (on 2k7) that ECP requires Autodiscover to be working properly. 
>  
>  
> >>  
>  From: jnat...@hotmail.com 
>  To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com 
>  Subject: RE: [Exchange] DB is mandatory on usermailbox / 
> >> autodiscover fail 
>  Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:50:57 -0400 
>  
>  The Microsoft Connectivity Analyzer is attempting to test 
> >> Autodiscover 
>  for u...@domain.com. 
>  Testing Autodiscover failed. 
>  
>  Additional Details 
>  
>  Elapsed Time: 2928 ms. 
>  
>  Test Steps 
>  
>  Attempting each method of contacting the Autodiscover service. 
>  The Autodiscover service couldn't be contacted successfully by 
>  any method. 
>  
>  Additional Details 
>  
>  Elapsed Time: 2928 ms. 
>  
>  Test Steps 
>  
>  Attempting to test potential Autodiscover URL 
>  https://domain.com:443/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml 
>  Testing of this potential Autodiscover URL failed. 
>  
>  Additional Details 
>  
>  Test Steps 
>  Attempting to test potential Autodiscover URL 
>  https://autodiscover.domain.com:443/Autodiscover/Autodiscover.xml 
>  Testing of this potential Autodiscover URL failed. 
>  
>  Additional Details 
>  
>  Test Steps 
>  Attempting to contact the Autodiscover service using the HTTP 
>  redirect method. 
>  The attempt to contact Autodiscover using the HTTP Redirect 
>  method failed. 
>  
>  Additional Details 
>  
>  Test Steps 
>  Attempting to contact the Autodiscover service using the DNS SRV 
>  redirect method. 
>  The

RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

[Damien Solodow]

Wouldn't it be like putting a portable hole in a bag of holding?

DAMIEN SOLODOW
Systems Engineer
317.447.6033 (office)
317.447.6014 (fax)
HARRISON COLLEGE

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Tim Evans
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 2:33 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Wouldn't it be great if Symantec acquired CA or vice versa?

…Tim


-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:03 AM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Between them and CA...

Kurt

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:52 AM, William Robbins  wrote:
> (just acquired by Symantec)…
>
> And so dies another good product. :'(
>
>
> - WJR
> 🙈🙉🙊
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Kuskie, Troy  wrote:
>>
>> We also use TouchDown (just acquired by Symantec)… but I wanted to 
>> mention that on the Play & iTunes stores Microsoft has released an official 
>> OWA App.
>> I believe the Droid version is still beta but the iOS version works well.
>> However, I don’t think they support the “Notes” feature but they tie 
>> natively into an Exchange organization and they are tight and require 
>> little overhead and are similar to the Windows 8 Metro Mail App plus they 
>> are free!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 6:51 AM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Interesting thread, glad I asked!
>>
>> Thanks all for your input.
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
>>
>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:39 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> iOS 4.2 was certified. J
>>
>>
>>
>> No version of Android was ever certified.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:28 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Sure, Apple does well with ActiveSync. Until it doesn’t.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Michael B. Smith
>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 6:10 PM
>>
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> I would suggest that Android doesn’t play well with ActiveSync. The 
>> specifications are published and quite definitive.
>>
>>
>>
>> Apple and Touchdown and Windows Phone and certain versions of Android 
>> deal with ActiveSync very well.
>>
>>
>>
>> Notes – they are another issue entirely.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:43 PM
>> To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> We went with the Touchdown app primarily because ActiveSync didn’t 
>> play nicely with Android.  Also, we needed to have the notes available as 
>> well.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:39 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the quick reply.
>>
>> So, is the lack of “Notes” being including in native ActiveSync on 
>> Android the reason you went with Touchdown?
>>
>> Or were there other factors?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:28 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> We are running a mix of Galaxy S3’s and S5’s and we have those 
>> interface using an app called Touchdown for Smartphones.  This app 
>> uses the activesync with our Exchange 2010 server to send emails, 
>> notes, tasks, calendar, contacts, etc to the phone and vice versa.  
>> We have been using this for 2 years and it works great, so yes, we 
>> can sync the Notes folder with our Android devices using the Touchdown for 
>> Smartphones app.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am not sure about using any other app though.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Be

RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

[Tim Evans]

Wouldn't it be great if Symantec acquired CA or vice versa?

…Tim


-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:03 AM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Between them and CA...

Kurt

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:52 AM, William Robbins  wrote:
> (just acquired by Symantec)…
>
> And so dies another good product. :'(
>
>
> - WJR
> 🙈🙉🙊
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Kuskie, Troy  wrote:
>>
>> We also use TouchDown (just acquired by Symantec)… but I wanted to mention
>> that on the Play & iTunes stores Microsoft has released an official OWA App.
>> I believe the Droid version is still beta but the iOS version works well.
>> However, I don’t think they support the “Notes” feature but they tie
>> natively into an Exchange organization and they are tight and require little
>> overhead and are similar to the Windows 8 Metro Mail App plus they are free!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 6:51 AM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Interesting thread, glad I asked!
>>
>> Thanks all for your input.
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
>>
>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:39 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> iOS 4.2 was certified. J
>>
>>
>>
>> No version of Android was ever certified.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:28 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Sure, Apple does well with ActiveSync. Until it doesn’t.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Michael B. Smith
>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 6:10 PM
>>
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> I would suggest that Android doesn’t play well with ActiveSync. The
>> specifications are published and quite definitive.
>>
>>
>>
>> Apple and Touchdown and Windows Phone and certain versions of Android deal
>> with ActiveSync very well.
>>
>>
>>
>> Notes – they are another issue entirely.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:43 PM
>> To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> We went with the Touchdown app primarily because ActiveSync didn’t play
>> nicely with Android.  Also, we needed to have the notes available as well.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:39 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the quick reply.
>>
>> So, is the lack of “Notes” being including in native ActiveSync on Android
>> the reason you went with Touchdown?
>>
>> Or were there other factors?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:28 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> We are running a mix of Galaxy S3’s and S5’s and we have those interface
>> using an app called Touchdown for Smartphones.  This app uses the activesync
>> with our Exchange 2010 server to send emails, notes, tasks, calendar,
>> contacts, etc to the phone and vice versa.  We have been using this for 2
>> years and it works great, so yes, we can sync the Notes folder with our
>> Android devices using the Touchdown for Smartphones app.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am not sure about using any other app though.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:18 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: [Exchange] E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Is it possible to sync Outlook’s “Notes” folder with an Android 4.4.2
>> device?
>>
>> After finding “Tasks” hidden within the phone’s calendar app, notes
>> appears to be the only remaining item that is not syncing w/ my Galaxy S5
>> (4.4.2).
>>
>> Or, I guess more generally – is there a list somewhe

RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

[Kuskie, Troy]

Yep and we haven’t seen an update to the app since!

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 11:59 AM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Between them and CA...

Kurt

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:52 AM, William Robbins  wrote:
> (just acquired by Symantec)…
>
> And so dies another good product. :'(
>
>
> - WJR
> 🙈🙉🙊
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Kuskie, Troy  wrote:
>>
>> We also use TouchDown (just acquired by Symantec)… but I wanted to 
>> mention that on the Play & iTunes stores Microsoft has released an official 
>> OWA App.
>> I believe the Droid version is still beta but the iOS version works well.
>> However, I don’t think they support the “Notes” feature but they tie 
>> natively into an Exchange organization and they are tight and require 
>> little overhead and are similar to the Windows 8 Metro Mail App plus they 
>> are free!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 6:51 AM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Interesting thread, glad I asked!
>>
>> Thanks all for your input.
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
>>
>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:39 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> iOS 4.2 was certified. J
>>
>>
>>
>> No version of Android was ever certified.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:28 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Sure, Apple does well with ActiveSync. Until it doesn’t.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Michael B. Smith
>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 6:10 PM
>>
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> I would suggest that Android doesn’t play well with ActiveSync. The 
>> specifications are published and quite definitive.
>>
>>
>>
>> Apple and Touchdown and Windows Phone and certain versions of Android 
>> deal with ActiveSync very well.
>>
>>
>>
>> Notes – they are another issue entirely.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:43 PM
>> To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> We went with the Touchdown app primarily because ActiveSync didn’t 
>> play nicely with Android.  Also, we needed to have the notes available as 
>> well.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:39 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the quick reply.
>>
>> So, is the lack of “Notes” being including in native ActiveSync on 
>> Android the reason you went with Touchdown?
>>
>> Or were there other factors?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:28 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook 
>> notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> We are running a mix of Galaxy S3’s and S5’s and we have those 
>> interface using an app called Touchdown for Smartphones.  This app 
>> uses the activesync with our Exchange 2010 server to send emails, 
>> notes, tasks, calendar, contacts, etc to the phone and vice versa.  
>> We have been using this for 2 years and it works great, so yes, we 
>> can sync the Notes folder with our Android devices using the Touchdown for 
>> Smartphones app.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am not sure about using any other app though.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:18 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: [Exchange] E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Is it possible to sync Outlook’s “Notes” folder with an Android 4.4.2 
>> device?
>>
>> After finding “Tasks” hidden within the phone’s calendar app, notes 
>> appears to be the only remaining item that is not syncing w/ my 
>> Galaxy S5 (4.4.2).
>>
>> Or, I gue

RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

[Ramatowski, Paul M..]

I was going to say something, but wrong list.

/Sneaky….

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of William Robbins
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 1:52 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

(just acquired by Symantec)…
And so dies another good product. :'(


- WJR
🙈🙉🙊


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Kuskie, Troy 
mailto:tkus...@rmhgroup.com>> wrote:
We also use TouchDown (just acquired by Symantec)… but I wanted to mention that 
on the Play & iTunes stores Microsoft has released an official OWA App. I 
believe the Droid version is still beta but the iOS version works well. 
However, I don’t think they support the “Notes” feature but they tie natively 
into an Exchange organization and they are tight and require little overhead 
and are similar to the Windows 8 Metro Mail App plus they are free!



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 6:51 AM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Interesting thread, glad I asked!
Thanks all for your input.
-Dave


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith

Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:39 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

iOS 4.2 was certified. ☺

No version of Android was ever certified.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:28 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com

Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Sure, Apple does well with ActiveSync. Until it doesn’t.

From: Michael B. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 6:10 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

I would suggest that Android doesn’t play well with ActiveSync. The 
specifications are published and quite definitive.

Apple and Touchdown and Windows Phone and certain versions of Android deal with 
ActiveSync very well.

Notes – they are another issue entirely.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:43 PM
To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

We went with the Touchdown app primarily because ActiveSync didn’t play nicely 
with Android.  Also, we needed to have the notes available as well.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:39 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Thanks for the quick reply.
So, is the lack of “Notes” being including in native ActiveSync on Android the 
reason you went with Touchdown?
Or were there other factors?



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:28 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

We are running a mix of Galaxy S3’s and S5’s and we have those interface using 
an app called Touchdown for Smartphones.  This app uses the activesync with our 
Exchange 2010 server to send emails, notes, tasks, calendar, contacts, etc to 
the phone and vice versa.  We have been using this for 2 years and it works 
great, so yes, we can sync the Notes folder with our Android devices using the 
Touchdown for Smartphones app.

I am not sure about using any other app though.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:18 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Is it possible to sync Outlook’s “Notes” folder with an Android 4.4.2 device?
After finding “Tasks” hidden within the phone’s calendar app, notes appears to 
be the only remaining item 

Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

[Kurt Buff]

Between them and CA...

Kurt

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:52 AM, William Robbins  wrote:
> (just acquired by Symantec)…
>
> And so dies another good product. :'(
>
>
> - WJR
> 🙈🙉🙊
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Kuskie, Troy  wrote:
>>
>> We also use TouchDown (just acquired by Symantec)… but I wanted to mention
>> that on the Play & iTunes stores Microsoft has released an official OWA App.
>> I believe the Droid version is still beta but the iOS version works well.
>> However, I don’t think they support the “Notes” feature but they tie
>> natively into an Exchange organization and they are tight and require little
>> overhead and are similar to the Windows 8 Metro Mail App plus they are free!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 6:51 AM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Interesting thread, glad I asked!
>>
>> Thanks all for your input.
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
>>
>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:39 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> iOS 4.2 was certified. J
>>
>>
>>
>> No version of Android was ever certified.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:28 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Sure, Apple does well with ActiveSync. Until it doesn’t.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Michael B. Smith
>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 6:10 PM
>>
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>>
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> I would suggest that Android doesn’t play well with ActiveSync. The
>> specifications are published and quite definitive.
>>
>>
>>
>> Apple and Touchdown and Windows Phone and certain versions of Android deal
>> with ActiveSync very well.
>>
>>
>>
>> Notes – they are another issue entirely.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:43 PM
>> To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> We went with the Touchdown app primarily because ActiveSync didn’t play
>> nicely with Android.  Also, we needed to have the notes available as well.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:39 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the quick reply.
>>
>> So, is the lack of “Notes” being including in native ActiveSync on Android
>> the reason you went with Touchdown?
>>
>> Or were there other factors?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:28 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> We are running a mix of Galaxy S3’s and S5’s and we have those interface
>> using an app called Touchdown for Smartphones.  This app uses the activesync
>> with our Exchange 2010 server to send emails, notes, tasks, calendar,
>> contacts, etc to the phone and vice versa.  We have been using this for 2
>> years and it works great, so yes, we can sync the Notes folder with our
>> Android devices using the Touchdown for Smartphones app.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am not sure about using any other app though.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:18 PM
>> To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> Subject: [Exchange] E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Is it possible to sync Outlook’s “Notes” folder with an Android 4.4.2
>> device?
>>
>> After finding “Tasks” hidden within the phone’s calendar app, notes
>> appears to be the only remaining item that is not syncing w/ my Galaxy S5
>> (4.4.2).
>>
>> Or, I guess more generally – is there a list somewhere of what ActiveSync
>> features are compatible for different devices/operating systems?
>>
>> Thx!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>> This email has been scanned by the Barracuda Spam and Virus Firewall. For
>> more information please visit http://www.barracudanetworks.com/spam   ­­
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>> 
>> *** T

Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

[William Robbins]

(just acquired by Symantec)…

And so dies another good product. :'(


- WJR
🙈🙉🙊




On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Kuskie, Troy  wrote:

>  We also use TouchDown (just acquired by Symantec)… but I wanted to
> mention that on the Play & iTunes stores Microsoft has released an official
> OWA App. I believe the Droid version is still beta but the iOS version
> works well. However, I don’t think they support the “Notes” feature but
> they tie natively into an Exchange organization and they are tight and
> require little overhead and are similar to the Windows 8 Metro Mail App
> plus they are free!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:
> listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] *On Behalf Of *David Mazzaccaro
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 4, 2014 6:51 AM
> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook
> notes)
>
>
>
> Interesting thread, glad I asked!
>
> Thanks all for your input.
>
> -Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [
> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Michael B. Smith
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:39 PM
> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook
> notes)
>
>
>
> iOS 4.2 was certified. J
>
>
>
> No version of Android was ever certified.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [
> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Daniel Chenault
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:28 PM
> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook
> notes)
>
>
>
> Sure, Apple does well with ActiveSync. Until it doesn’t.
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael B. Smith 
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 03, 2014 6:10 PM
>
> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>
> *Subject:* [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>
>
>
> I would suggest that Android doesn’t play well with ActiveSync. The
> specifications are published and quite definitive.
>
>
>
> Apple and Touchdown and Windows Phone and certain versions of Android deal
> with ActiveSync very well.
>
>
>
> Notes – they are another issue entirely.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [
> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Shannon Turner
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:43 PM
> *To:* 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
> *Subject:* [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>
>
>
> We went with the Touchdown app primarily because ActiveSync didn’t play
> nicely with Android.  Also, we needed to have the notes available as well.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [
> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *David Mazzaccaro
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:39 PM
> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>
>
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.
>
> So, is the lack of “Notes” being including in native ActiveSync on Android
> the reason you went with Touchdown?
>
> Or were there other factors?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [
> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Shannon Turner
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:28 PM
> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>
>
>
> We are running a mix of Galaxy S3’s and S5’s and we have those interface
> using an app called Touchdown for Smartphones.  This app uses the
> activesync with our Exchange 2010 server to send emails, notes, tasks,
> calendar, contacts, etc to the phone and vice versa.  We have been using
> this for 2 years and it works great, so yes, we can sync the Notes folder
> with our Android devices using the Touchdown for Smartphones app.
>
>
>
> I am not sure about using any other app though.
>
>
>
> *From:* listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [
> mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *David Mazzaccaro
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:18 PM
> *To:* exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> *Subject:* [Exchange] E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)
>
>
>
> Is it possible to sync Outlook’s “Notes” folder with an Android 4.4.2
> device?
>
> After finding “Tasks” hidden within the phone’s calendar app, notes
> appears to be the only remaining item that is not syncing w/ my Galaxy S5
> (4.4.2).
>
> Or, I guess more generally – is there a list somewhere of what ActiveSync
> features are compatible for different devices/operating systems?
>
> Thx!
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>
> This email has been scanned by the Barracuda Spam and Virus Firewall. For
> more information please visit http://www.barracudanetworks.com/spam   ­­
>
>
> .
>
>
> .
>
>
> *-- *** This message may contain confidential
> and proprietary RMH Group information and is intended only for the sole use
> of the recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you shoul

Re: [Exchange] RE: [NTSysADM] Cross Post - Recommendations for a router

[Andrew S. Baker]

You can get pfSense appliances (www.netgate.com) or Fortigate appliances
for not-too-much funds.

They'll both do what you want here.

Also consider: http://www.ubnt.com/edgemax/edgerouter-pro/

Regards,






*ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* 
*Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for
the SMB market...*




On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Graeme Carstairs 
wrote:

> Thanks guys,
>
> ill look at the Mikrotiks, as I have had some experience with Drayteks and
> i find the Gui to be very cludgy.
>
> thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
>
> On 4 September 2014 16:22, J- P  wrote:
>
>> +1
>> Have them deployed accross the US, East Africa , West Africa, Central &
>> South America
>>
>> they're also big with ISP's as they also have DSL models
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jean-Paul Natola
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>> > From: gavin.wi...@smppartners.com
>> > To: ntsys...@lists.myitforum.com; exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Cross Post - Recommendations for a router
>> > Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:34:48 +
>> >
>> >
>> > The answer to this is normally Draytek.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Used them loads and they are highly configurable and bomb proof.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This for example:
>> http://www.draytek.co.uk/products/business/vigor-3200
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Gavin Wilby
>> >
>> > IT Support Engineer
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
>> > [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
>> > Sent: 04 September 2014 15:28
>> > To: ntsys...@lists.myitforum.com; exchange@lists.myitforum.com
>> > Subject: [NTSysADM] Cross Post - Recommendations for a router
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi There,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I urgently need to purchase a couple of routers but I would like
>> > something not too expensive (i.e. cheap) but that can do the following
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 1. Configurable Gigabit WAN port (i.e. link speed and duplex)
>> >
>> > 2. support mulitpl static IP's on the WAN Port (not sequntial)
>> >
>> > 3. allow for port forwarding from each static IP (so .1 port 80 to one
>> > server .5 port 80 to antoher)
>> >
>> > 4. be gui configurable
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > So we have pulic ips  of
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > x.x.x.10 - x.x.x.30
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > we have a router sitting between internet and a public lan and have
>> > several devices connected to theat, we would like another router to sit
>> > with its wan port on the public LAn, and its lan port on the private
>> > corp lan
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > assign it x.x.x.15, x.x.x.18 and x.x.x.21 and have all LAN traffic got
>> > hrough this throught he publi lan and out onto the internet, and
>> > incoming for thos ips on port 80 and 443 routed to an different
>> > internal server for each.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Any suggestions on something good and cheap?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Ta
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Graeme
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!
>> >
>> > SMP Partners Limited, SMP Trustees Limited and SMP Fund Services
>> > Limited are licensed by the Isle of Man Financial Supervision
>> > Commission. SMP Accounting & Tax Limited is a member of the ICAEW
>> > Practice Assurance Scheme.
>> >
>> > SMP Partners Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company
>> > Registration No: 000908V
>> > Directors: M.W. Denton, M.J. Derbyshire, P.N. Eckersley, S.E McGowan,
>> > O. Peck, J.J. Scott, S.J. Turner
>> >
>> > SMP Trustees Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company
>> > Registration No: 068396C
>> > Directors: A.C. Baggesen, M.W. Denton, O. Peck, J.J. Scott, J.
>> > Watterson, J. Cubbon
>> >
>> > SMP Fund Services Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company
>> > Registration No: 120288C
>> > Directors: V. Campbell, M.W. Denton, P.N. Eckersley, D.A. Manser, S.E
>> > McGowan, O. Peck, J.J. Scott, R.K. Corkill
>> >
>> > SMP Accounting & Tax Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company
>> > Registration No: 001316V
>> > Directors: I.F. Begley,  A.J. Dowling, P. Duchars, P.N. Eckersley, J.J.
>> > Scott, S.J. Turner
>> >
>> > SMP Capital Markets Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company
>> > Registration No: 002438V
>> > Directors: M.W. Denton, M.J. Derbyshire, D.F Hudson, S.E McGowan, O.
>> > Peck, J.J. Scott.
>> >
>> > SMP Partners Limited, SMP Trustees Limited, SMP Fund Services Limited,
>> > SMP Accounting & Tax Limited and SMP Capital Markets Limited are
>> > members of the SMP Partners Group of Companies.
>> >
>> > 
>> >
>> > This email is confidential and is subject to disclaimers. Details can
>> > be found at: http://www.smppartners.com/disclaimer.html
>> > __
>> > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>> service.
>> > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
>> > _

RE: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[Daniel Chenault]

Your question is not clear. "Apparently" configured - it either is or it isn't. 
If it is set to accept from a specific IP the condition you state is expected 
behavior. Could you clarify please?

Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 17:27:46 +0100
Subject: [Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010
From: loonyto...@gmail.com
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com

An Exchange 2010 server receive connector though apparently configured to 
accept e-mail from an ip is rejecting e-mail from every ip with the error
550 5.7.1 External client with ip address does not have permissions to submit 
to this server.

I have compared with other internet receive connectors and it is set the same.
Google seems to only bring up issues between hub and edge servers, this is a 
multi role single server setup.

Thanks
Graeme
-- 
Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!
  

[Exchange] REceive connector Exchnage 2010

[Graeme Carstairs]

An Exchange 2010 server receive connector though apparently configured to
accept e-mail from an ip is rejecting e-mail from every ip with the error

550 5.7.1 External client with ip address does not have permissions to
submit to this server.

I have compared with other internet receive connectors and it is set the
same.

Google seems to only bring up issues between hub and edge servers, this is
a multi role single server setup.

Thanks

Graeme


-- 
Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!

Re: [Exchange] RE: [NTSysADM] Cross Post - Recommendations for a router

[Graeme Carstairs]

Thanks guys,

ill look at the Mikrotiks, as I have had some experience with Drayteks and
i find the Gui to be very cludgy.

thanks

Graeme



On 4 September 2014 16:22, J- P  wrote:

> +1
> Have them deployed accross the US, East Africa , West Africa, Central &
> South America
>
> they're also big with ISP's as they also have DSL models
>
>
>
>
>
> Jean-Paul Natola
>
>
>
>
> 
> > From: gavin.wi...@smppartners.com
> > To: ntsys...@lists.myitforum.com; exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> > Subject: RE: [NTSysADM] Cross Post - Recommendations for a router
> > Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 14:34:48 +
> >
> >
> > The answer to this is normally Draytek.
> >
> >
> >
> > Used them loads and they are highly configurable and bomb proof.
> >
> >
> >
> > This for example:  http://www.draytek.co.uk/products/business/vigor-3200
> >
> >
> >
> > Gavin Wilby
> >
> > IT Support Engineer
> >
> >
> >
> > From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
> > [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
> > Sent: 04 September 2014 15:28
> > To: ntsys...@lists.myitforum.com; exchange@lists.myitforum.com
> > Subject: [NTSysADM] Cross Post - Recommendations for a router
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi There,
> >
> >
> >
> > I urgently need to purchase a couple of routers but I would like
> > something not too expensive (i.e. cheap) but that can do the following
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. Configurable Gigabit WAN port (i.e. link speed and duplex)
> >
> > 2. support mulitpl static IP's on the WAN Port (not sequntial)
> >
> > 3. allow for port forwarding from each static IP (so .1 port 80 to one
> > server .5 port 80 to antoher)
> >
> > 4. be gui configurable
> >
> >
> >
> > So we have pulic ips  of
> >
> >
> >
> > x.x.x.10 - x.x.x.30
> >
> >
> >
> > we have a router sitting between internet and a public lan and have
> > several devices connected to theat, we would like another router to sit
> > with its wan port on the public LAn, and its lan port on the private
> > corp lan
> >
> >
> >
> > assign it x.x.x.15, x.x.x.18 and x.x.x.21 and have all LAN traffic got
> > hrough this throught he publi lan and out onto the internet, and
> > incoming for thos ips on port 80 and 443 routed to an different
> > internal server for each.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any suggestions on something good and cheap?
> >
> >
> >
> > Ta
> >
> >
> >
> > Graeme
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!
> >
> > SMP Partners Limited, SMP Trustees Limited and SMP Fund Services
> > Limited are licensed by the Isle of Man Financial Supervision
> > Commission. SMP Accounting & Tax Limited is a member of the ICAEW
> > Practice Assurance Scheme.
> >
> > SMP Partners Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company
> > Registration No: 000908V
> > Directors: M.W. Denton, M.J. Derbyshire, P.N. Eckersley, S.E McGowan,
> > O. Peck, J.J. Scott, S.J. Turner
> >
> > SMP Trustees Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company
> > Registration No: 068396C
> > Directors: A.C. Baggesen, M.W. Denton, O. Peck, J.J. Scott, J.
> > Watterson, J. Cubbon
> >
> > SMP Fund Services Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company
> > Registration No: 120288C
> > Directors: V. Campbell, M.W. Denton, P.N. Eckersley, D.A. Manser, S.E
> > McGowan, O. Peck, J.J. Scott, R.K. Corkill
> >
> > SMP Accounting & Tax Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company
> > Registration No: 001316V
> > Directors: I.F. Begley,  A.J. Dowling, P. Duchars, P.N. Eckersley, J.J.
> > Scott, S.J. Turner
> >
> > SMP Capital Markets Limited registered in the Isle of Man, Company
> > Registration No: 002438V
> > Directors: M.W. Denton, M.J. Derbyshire, D.F Hudson, S.E McGowan, O.
> > Peck, J.J. Scott.
> >
> > SMP Partners Limited, SMP Trustees Limited, SMP Fund Services Limited,
> > SMP Accounting & Tax Limited and SMP Capital Markets Limited are
> > members of the SMP Partners Group of Companies.
> >
> > 
> >
> > This email is confidential and is subject to disclaimers. Details can
> > be found at: http://www.smppartners.com/disclaimer.html
> > __
> > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> > __
>
>
>


-- 
Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!

RE: [Exchange] Cross Post - Recommendations for a router

[Tim Evans]

You beat me to it. I doubt that you'll find anything cheaper than this: 
http://routerboard.com/RB750GL
Unless you have a spare PC sitting around and put pfsense on it.

…Tim


-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 7:45 AM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] Cross Post - Recommendations for a router

http://www.mikrotik.com/

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Graeme Carstairs  wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I urgently need to purchase a couple of routers but I would like something
> not too expensive (i.e. cheap) but that can do the following
>
>
> 1. Configurable Gigabit WAN port (i.e. link speed and duplex)
> 2. support mulitpl static IP's on the WAN Port (not sequntial)
> 3. allow for port forwarding from each static IP (so .1 port 80 to one
> server .5 port 80 to antoher)
> 4. be gui configurable
>
> So we have pulic ips  of
>
> x.x.x.10 - x.x.x.30
>
> we have a router sitting between internet and a public lan and have several
> devices connected to theat, we would like another router to sit with its wan
> port on the public LAn, and its lan port on the private corp lan
>
> assign it x.x.x.15, x.x.x.18 and x.x.x.21 and have all LAN traffic got
> hrough this throught he publi lan and out onto the internet, and incoming
> for thos ips on port 80 and 443 routed to an different internal server for
> each.
>
> Any suggestions on something good and cheap?
>
> Ta
>
> Graeme
>
>
> --
> Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!

Re: [Exchange] Cross Post - Recommendations for a router

[Kurt Buff]

http://www.mikrotik.com/

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Graeme Carstairs  wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I urgently need to purchase a couple of routers but I would like something
> not too expensive (i.e. cheap) but that can do the following
>
>
> 1. Configurable Gigabit WAN port (i.e. link speed and duplex)
> 2. support mulitpl static IP's on the WAN Port (not sequntial)
> 3. allow for port forwarding from each static IP (so .1 port 80 to one
> server .5 port 80 to antoher)
> 4. be gui configurable
>
> So we have pulic ips  of
>
> x.x.x.10 - x.x.x.30
>
> we have a router sitting between internet and a public lan and have several
> devices connected to theat, we would like another router to sit with its wan
> port on the public LAn, and its lan port on the private corp lan
>
> assign it x.x.x.15, x.x.x.18 and x.x.x.21 and have all LAN traffic got
> hrough this throught he publi lan and out onto the internet, and incoming
> for thos ips on port 80 and 443 routed to an different internal server for
> each.
>
> Any suggestions on something good and cheap?
>
> Ta
>
> Graeme
>
>
> --
> Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!

Re: [Exchange] Cross Post - Recommendations for a router

[Michael Pope]

Look at pfSense.
On Sep 4, 2014 10:29 AM, "Graeme Carstairs"  wrote:

> Hi There,
>
> I urgently need to purchase a couple of routers but I would like something
> not too expensive (i.e. cheap) but that can do the following
>
>
> 1. Configurable Gigabit WAN port (i.e. link speed and duplex)
> 2. support mulitpl static IP's on the WAN Port (not sequntial)
> 3. allow for port forwarding from each static IP (so .1 port 80 to one
> server .5 port 80 to antoher)
> 4. be gui configurable
>
> So we have pulic ips  of
>
> x.x.x.10 - x.x.x.30
>
> we have a router sitting between internet and a public lan and have
> several devices connected to theat, we would like another router to sit
> with its wan port on the public LAn, and its lan port on the private corp
> lan
>
> assign it x.x.x.15, x.x.x.18 and x.x.x.21 and have all LAN traffic got
> hrough this throught he publi lan and out onto the internet, and incoming
> for thos ips on port 80 and 443 routed to an different internal server for
> each.
>
> Any suggestions on something good and cheap?
>
> Ta
>
> Graeme
>
>
> --
> Good news everyone, you have just received an e-mail from me!
>

RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

[Kuskie, Troy]

We also use TouchDown (just acquired by Symantec)… but I wanted to mention that 
on the Play & iTunes stores Microsoft has released an official OWA App. I 
believe the Droid version is still beta but the iOS version works well. 
However, I don’t think they support the “Notes” feature but they tie natively 
into an Exchange organization and they are tight and require little overhead 
and are similar to the Windows 8 Metro Mail App plus they are free!



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 6:51 AM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Interesting thread, glad I asked!
Thanks all for your input.
-Dave


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:39 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

iOS 4.2 was certified. ☺

No version of Android was ever certified.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:28 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Sure, Apple does well with ActiveSync. Until it doesn’t.

From: Michael B. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 6:10 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

I would suggest that Android doesn’t play well with ActiveSync. The 
specifications are published and quite definitive.

Apple and Touchdown and Windows Phone and certain versions of Android deal with 
ActiveSync very well.

Notes – they are another issue entirely.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:43 PM
To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

We went with the Touchdown app primarily because ActiveSync didn’t play nicely 
with Android.  Also, we needed to have the notes available as well.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:39 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Thanks for the quick reply.
So, is the lack of “Notes” being including in native ActiveSync on Android the 
reason you went with Touchdown?
Or were there other factors?



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:28 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

We are running a mix of Galaxy S3’s and S5’s and we have those interface using 
an app called Touchdown for Smartphones.  This app uses the activesync with our 
Exchange 2010 server to send emails, notes, tasks, calendar, contacts, etc to 
the phone and vice versa.  We have been using this for 2 years and it works 
great, so yes, we can sync the Notes folder with our Android devices using the 
Touchdown for Smartphones app.

I am not sure about using any other app though.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:18 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Is it possible to sync Outlook’s “Notes” folder with an Android 4.4.2 device?
After finding “Tasks” hidden within the phone’s calendar app, notes appears to 
be the only remaining item that is not syncing w/ my Galaxy S5 (4.4.2).
Or, I guess more generally – is there a list somewhere of what ActiveSync 
features are compatible for different devices/operating systems?
Thx!


.

This email has been scanned by the Barracuda Spam and Virus Firewall. For more 
information please visit http://www.barracudanetworks.com/spam   ­­

.

.

*** This message may contain confidential and proprietary RMH Group information 
and is intended only for the sole use of the recipient(s). If you are not the 
named recipient you should not read, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please 
notify the sender and destroy this e-mail and any

RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

[David Mazzaccaro]

Interesting thread, glad I asked!
Thanks all for your input.
-Dave


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 9:39 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

iOS 4.2 was certified. ☺

No version of Android was ever certified.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Daniel Chenault
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:28 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Sure, Apple does well with ActiveSync. Until it doesn’t.

From: Michael B. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 6:10 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

I would suggest that Android doesn’t play well with ActiveSync. The 
specifications are published and quite definitive.

Apple and Touchdown and Windows Phone and certain versions of Android deal with 
ActiveSync very well.

Notes – they are another issue entirely.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:43 PM
To: 'exchange@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

We went with the Touchdown app primarily because ActiveSync didn’t play nicely 
with Android.  Also, we needed to have the notes available as well.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:39 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Thanks for the quick reply.
So, is the lack of “Notes” being including in native ActiveSync on Android the 
reason you went with Touchdown?
Or were there other factors?



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Shannon Turner
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:28 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] RE: E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

We are running a mix of Galaxy S3’s and S5’s and we have those interface using 
an app called Touchdown for Smartphones.  This app uses the activesync with our 
Exchange 2010 server to send emails, notes, tasks, calendar, contacts, etc to 
the phone and vice versa.  We have been using this for 2 years and it works 
great, so yes, we can sync the Notes folder with our Android devices using the 
Touchdown for Smartphones app.

I am not sure about using any other app though.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of David Mazzaccaro
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 3:18 PM
To: exchange@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [Exchange] E2010 ActiveSync Android 4.4.2 (Outlook notes)

Is it possible to sync Outlook’s “Notes” folder with an Android 4.4.2 device?
After finding “Tasks” hidden within the phone’s calendar app, notes appears to 
be the only remaining item that is not syncing w/ my Galaxy S5 (4.4.2).
Or, I guess more generally – is there a list somewhere of what ActiveSync 
features are compatible for different devices/operating systems?
Thx!


.

This email has been scanned by the Barracuda Spam and Virus Firewall. For more 
information please visit http://www.barracudanetworks.com/spam   ­­

.

.