RE: Hot off the Fixes....
Who doesn't? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes I read Martins Email. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes I have an RSS newsfeed that tells me anytime MS makes a new download available -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes How did you hear about this (MS046)? I'm subscribed to MS's security bulletin service but I haven't received anything from MS regarding this patch. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes MS03-046 is listed as critical and involves somebody sending bogus data to your smtp port. In our case, the smtp port of our exchange server is not directly connected to the internet - our external SMTP interface is a sendmail firewall that forwards the email to an antivirus gateway and then to the exchange machine. In this scenario, the bogus smtp data is much less likely to ever reach the exchange server. If your exchange SMTP port is directly on the internet then I would be in a hurry to load that patch. Tom -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hot off the Fixes Anyone applied these yet? http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS03-046.asp http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS03-047.asp Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hot off the Fixes....
Dad doesn't either. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes I don't think Buck does yet?? -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes Who doesn't? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevinm Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 4:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes I read Martins Email. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes I have an RSS newsfeed that tells me anytime MS makes a new download available -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes How did you hear about this (MS046)? I'm subscribed to MS's security bulletin service but I haven't received anything from MS regarding this patch. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 3:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Hot off the Fixes MS03-046 is listed as critical and involves somebody sending bogus data to your smtp port. In our case, the smtp port of our exchange server is not directly connected to the internet - our external SMTP interface is a sendmail firewall that forwards the email to an antivirus gateway and then to the exchange machine. In this scenario, the bogus smtp data is much less likely to ever reach the exchange server. If your exchange SMTP port is directly on the internet then I would be in a hurry to load that patch. Tom -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hot off the Fixes Anyone applied these yet? http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS03-046.asp http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/secur ity/bulletin/MS03-047.asp Ali _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: DBs and daylight savings time
They are sequential: E001.log., E002.log. etc. E00.log is the current log file. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Orin Rehorst Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 6:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: DBs and daylight savings time A mainframe db can get messed up when switching from daylight savings time. On the morning of Oct 26 an hour will be ran twice. A transaction could run at 1:15 AM, the hour be changed from 2 to 1 AM, and then another transaction ran after the first but be logged as 1:10 AM. That can mess up redo logs etc. How does Exchange's db keep it straight? Regards, Orin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003
I don't think you will be able to find a definitive answer to this, but IMO, I wouldn't use the 2003 ADC to migrate 5.5 to E2k. There seems to be a lot going on here: W2003 domain, E2k and E2003 servers, migration from 5.5 etc.. Why not just migrate directly to E2003 when you feel comfortable with it after testing in the lab, and forget the E2k bit entirely? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Just upgraded a domain from Windows NT to Windows 2003. Our next phase will migrate Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 with some users going to Exchange 2003 (so it can be proven as a viable endpoint for the migration) using the Move Mailbox method. If I use the ADC for Exchange 2003, does anyone know if there are any gotcha's moving mailboxes from the Exchange 5.5 server to the Exchange 2000 server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003
Sure you can, just not in-place. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 You can not go directly to E2K3 from Exchange 5.5. IIRC From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:54:18 -0400 I don't think you will be able to find a definitive answer to this, but IMO, I wouldn't use the 2003 ADC to migrate 5.5 to E2k. There seems to be a lot going on here: W2003 domain, E2k and E2003 servers, migration from 5.5 etc.. Why not just migrate directly to E2003 when you feel comfortable with it after testing in the lab, and forget the E2k bit entirely? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Just upgraded a domain from Windows NT to Windows 2003. Our next phase will migrate Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 with some users going to Exchange 2003 (so it can be proven as a viable endpoint for the migration) using the Move Mailbox method. If I use the ADC for Exchange 2003, does anyone know if there are any gotcha's moving mailboxes from the Exchange 5.5 server to the Exchange 2000 server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoticon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Error - Client seeing The Page cannot be displayed
Start simple: Does this user have local logon rights to the OWA server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn Connelly Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 6:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Error - Client seeing The Page cannot be displayed OWA suddenly (for an unknown reason) stopped working for one client. After client enters mailbox name/user name and pass the next screen displayed is: The Page cannot be displayed HTTP 500 Internal Server Error If I turn off Show friendly HTTP error messages IE 6, the message then becomes: There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request. Other details: - the client only began having problems this week and claims to have not modified his password; - the client can log into his email via Outlook in the office; - I can log into this mailbox without difficulty using an admins. credentials; - It is the same problem on any computer so the problem is not specific to one computer. As I mentioned, this just started happening and it's only this account (that I know of). The only thing that changed recently was that I placed OWA (separate from Exchange Server 5.5) into a DMZ. But that change didn't seem to affect anyone else. Does anyone know why this happened and how to fix this? Thank you, Shawn P.S. I just found that I cannot send a message to this list using OWA. Anyway to configure outbound msgs in OWA to send as text only? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Time Stamp issue
Sure its just not something screwy within whatever app is generating those emails? As an example, in Veritas Backup Exec, the job status email notifications are sometimes off by an hour. Its a bug within BE itself. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:34 AM Subject: RE: Time Stamp issue And that's what's not making sense. Like I said all other external email is normal just from this sender. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hmmm.. Didn't catch that. The inside time stamp (ie the one embedded in the message) definitely is but the received envelope stamp is based on the mail server's time, adjusted by the client's timezone setting. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Time Stamp issue Both locations are set by the mainframe? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Time is set by the sender side. Your mainframe's clock and/or timezone are set incorrectly. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Gonzalez, Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Time Stamp issue We seem to be having an issue with Outlook in all versions. We get emails from our mainframe in the middle of the night. When we receive them in Outlook the pointer in the inbox shows for example, 12am. When we open the message it shows sent as being 1am. This is the only emails that we are getting where the time is messed up. All other emails internal and Internet are correct. Any idea's? I have verified that the time on the machines is correct and checked the time zones but like I said its only from this one sender. Also where do both of those time stamps come from? The pointer and the sent inside the message? Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS
Pst = bad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JOHN SMITH Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS Dear Brethen, May the peace of God the father, the Son and the Holy Spirit be with you all. We are a non profit organisation resides in part of Afica. Our organisation's name is Moses's Hand Foundation. We've decided to erased child abuse and some other things which make the youths to be idles. Our recent research made us to realised that many youths in Africa were initiated to be a frauders, they don't have any good intention or any room for the Lord in their hearts. When you asked them, they have some reasons which might be genuine in their own eyes but in God's eyes there are no excuse. This Foundation now decided to stand on it's feet believing that it will get a good support from International countries to say no to Child Abuse and change the mind of youths for Christ. We decided to have a National Seminars for youth and some other programmes that will make these youths to know that if they can study and work and trust God they can do good in the land by not stealing or do frauding all around. Brethen, we need your assistance, either in monetary terms or materials. Your assistance may be some christian books that we can give these people after this program. whatsoever. Let's join hands to say no child abuse in any form, prostitutions and stealing and frauding in any form. Remember that our Moses needed somebody to raise his hand so that victory can be sure. We shall be glad to read from you if you want to assist us financially or materially.you can visit us online at www.hopealive.wsmcafe.com Shalom Best Regards Bro. John Smith _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mail Loop with automatic replies to the internet
Friggin delete the SMTP address from the PF and then add it to the new mailbox. - Original Message - From: Nathan Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:22 PM Subject: RE: Mail Loop with automatic replies to the internet We need to maintain the address, so is there a way to transfer the live address to a new account/alias without having to delete the original account? I know this is bordering on a behavioral problem, just I am leaving the company today (I know!) and deleting this account would need to be done out of hours. Nathan -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 9:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop with automatic replies to the internet That is not supported. Use a mailbox instead and give all the necessary users permissions on it. They can configure their profiles to open it as a second mailbox. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Boyd Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop with automatic replies to the internet Is it possible to create an out of office message for a public folder? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mail Loop with automatic replies to the internet The OOF asst will only fire once per sender every time its activated. An auto reply to the Internet will fire every time regardless, creating the loop you are seeing. Auto Replies Bad BBQ Good. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Boyd Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Loop with automatic replies to the internet I am administrating an Exchange 5.5 environment and have enabled an automatic reply to the internet for a public folder. The public folder is for our customer services who want customers to reply to confirm an e-mail address. Having turned on this rule I am experiencing a mail loop with an aol user who has turned on an out of office assistant. I was of the understanding that this feature should only send one message per 24 hour period to the same address and not create a mail loop. Having tested it on my external mail account with an out of office it does not create a loop. Am I wrong and this feature only applies to Out Of Office to the internet, or is this a glitch that maybe someone has an idea to fix? Thanks, Nathan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Repairing individual mailboxes
Have you tried restoring to a recovery server with another backup to see if you can grab the mailboxes that way? What caused the initial corruption? - Original Message - From: Neil Doody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:42 PM Subject: Repairing individual mailboxes I had some database corruption over the weekend, ive recovered from this and the system is working relatively okay. Some mailboxes however seem to have gotten corrupted. If I send a mail to a user with a corrupt mailbox, they go into outlook and there Inbox is empty. I look in the system manager and the email is stuck in the Queue, if I look at the mailboxes view within system manager it shows there are items in the users mailbox. I tried using ExMerge and it runs but extracts no emails. If I delete the users mailbox and recreate it, they work fine, so there is defiantly a problem with there mailbox on the server. Are there any repair tools that can just attempt to repair and get any data from an individual mailbox from with an Exchange Database? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Repairing individual mailboxes
Defrag? I guess the next question is what errors are in the event logs and if this is 5.5, did you re-run the Performance Optimizer. - Original Message - From: Neil Doody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:33 PM Subject: RE: Repairing individual mailboxes Then again, I just ran it once more to be doubley safe, but rather than do alltests I told it just to do mailbox and it found 6 warnings in the folders. After finding there was warnings, I ran it with -fix and its ran another 6 fixes. Strange because I only did all of this last night, it must not have detected some of the problems, or maybe there was a problem during defrag? I am stumped anyway. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody Sent: 30 September 2003 19:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Repairing individual mailboxes Yep. -Original Message- From: Michelle Harmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 September 2003 19:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Repairing individual mailboxes Did you ever run isinteg? -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Repairing individual mailboxes I had some database corruption over the weekend, ive recovered from this and the system is working relatively okay. Some mailboxes however seem to have gotten corrupted. If I send a mail to a user with a corrupt mailbox, they go into outlook and there Inbox is empty. I look in the system manager and the email is stuck in the Queue, if I look at the mailboxes view within system manager it shows there are items in the users mailbox. I tried using ExMerge and it runs but extracts no emails. If I delete the users mailbox and recreate it, they work fine, so there is defiantly a problem with there mailbox on the server. Are there any repair tools that can just attempt to repair and get any data from an individual mailbox from with an Exchange Database? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Repairing individual mailboxes
It typically takes 3 runs or so to fix everything if it can. - Original Message - From: Neil Doody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:40 PM Subject: RE: Repairing individual mailboxes Ai, ill do that now, but I did do it last night, I ran it, did some things, then just before the defrag ran it once more and there was no errors! Then I continued to do the defrag after. Maybe I should have run it once more after the defrag huh? Ill know for next time ;p -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 September 2003 19:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Repairing individual mailboxes Keep running it until it finds nothing. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Is this an online or offline restore? - Original Message - From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:11 AM Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Actually, I tried all of those... Isinteg... Esutil... And changing the restore in progress setting... One thing I saw said to delete that registry key. Nothing so far has worked... At this point the problem now appears to be that the Directory Service won't start, but the system says it is failing with no errors. So, I'm uninstalling 5.5 and will reinstall and then restore again. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition did you run isinteg with the patch option? Also what was the exact error message you get in the event log. Search on that as it may have to do with changing the restore in progress setting. From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:59:24 -0400 I just managed to restore via the remote backup. I kept getting errors in the event log but eventually one of them led me to a knowledgebase article that mentioned needing to have NetBIOS over TCP/IP turned on on the servers. Having done that then it worked. However, the Information Store won't start afterward, even with a reboot of the restored server. I'm currently looking through some knowledgebase articles to see if I can figure anything out... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition No. Is this an online backup? Simply re-direct the info store restore to the recovery 5.5 server. You don't need to restore the directory to get at the mailboxes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Hmmm... One more thing... Does the server I'm restoring to require the same name as the old server? Not just the same org and site? Matt -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition I believe I'll need the log files won't I? The restore doesn't work just as-is. Man, I hope my backup guy did his job here... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Can you see the 5.5 server in NTBACKUP on the server with the Admin Gui on it? Otherwise, slap the tape drive on the 5.5 member server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Argh! Trying this IS making my head hurt. I installed to another member server in the same domain as my current Exchange 2000 server. So, both are in an Active Directory domain. I get the same thing with the 5.5 management console... It just can't find the 5.5 server. I was used to seeing this just connect with no problem previously when I had two 5.5 servers going at once. So, what 's the problem here? Some service I didn't install, something I haven't configured correctly? I'm getting no luck in Microsoft's knowledgebase. This is just a basic install following the instructions Andy gave here... Same org and site as the old server. I installed just the server itself and the management console, and installed it as a non multi-site server. I have no idea if that's the problem. I wouldn't think it would be. Any clue as to why the management console on another server will not pick up this 5.5 server?? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Mongo head hurt. You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5 server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop out those mailboxes to psts and import them into the new server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer
Re: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1)
Create a separate, distinct, backup job for the Exch store and it should work. - Original Message - From: Finch Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:16 AM Subject: Ntbackup with Win2K3 and Exchange 2K3 (RC1) I am a little too use to Veritas and Ex 5.5 so I am new to the 'STM' file and the backup procedures of Exchange2K3 (same as 2000 it appears). I am trying to backup using NTBackup to a disk, all the rest of the backup completes but I can not get the Exchange portion to backup correctly. It appears from the log, I get the volumes and (based on size) what appears to be the Public folders but I can't seem to get the Private store to backup. At the very bottom (pasted below) is where it fails. I've searched for the error in the 'Q' articles, I don't seem to find anything (looking in Exchange2000 kB's). Maybe it's just a RC bug... -Original Message- To: Finch Brett Subject: Full Backup Status Operation: Backup Active backup destination: File Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup (via shadow copy) of C: C_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #1 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:25. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Directories: 591 Files: 3588 Bytes: 182,742,183 Time: 3 minutes and 40 seconds Backup (via shadow copy) of D: D_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #2 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Directories: 150 Files: 520 Bytes: 51,624,632 Time: 12 seconds Backup (via shadow copy) of F: F_DRIVE_NTFS Backup set #3 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:29. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:31. Directories: 263 Files: 4262 Bytes: 407,445,513 Time: 1 minute and 40 seconds Backup of U: \\homeserver\homeshare$ Backup set #4 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:31. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. Directories: 101 Files: 2706 Bytes: 116,742,999 Time: 1 minute and 7 seconds Backup of HOMESERVER\Microsoft Information Store\First Storage Group Backup set #5 on media #1 Backup description: Set created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Media name: Backup.bkf created 2003/09/25 at 00:22 Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Backup is already active. ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupSetup()' additional data '-'The 'Microsoft Information Store' returned 'Functions called in an invalid sequence. ' from a call to 'HrESEBackupClose()' additional data '-' The operation was ended. Backup completed on 2003/09/25 at 00:32. Directories: 0 Files: 0 Bytes: 0 Time: 1 second -- The operation did not successfully complete. -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Be sure to restore only the Info Store, not the directory. Redirect it to the recovery server. *Do not* run any utilities on the database. Let it try to start on its own. With an online restore, there is no need to run isinteg and the only time you should have to run eseutil is if you screwed up and the recovery server's OS and SP level do not match the production's OS and SP level. In the DR whitepaper, use the section that refers to Single Mailbox Recovery and you should be good to go. - Original Message - From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:31 AM Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition It's an online restore, and was an online full backup. I've been following the Whitepaper as noted in another post. I've had this sucker for a while, but since things didn't seem to be working as described, I needed the information you guys could provide. I've been hacking at this for a while now, just trying anything I could from the Knowledgebase or other sources to see what would or wouldn't work. At this point I think my best bet is to start over from the beginning of the restore process and make sure I didn't miss a step. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Is this an online or offline restore? - Original Message - From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 11:11 AM Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Actually, I tried all of those... Isinteg... Esutil... And changing the restore in progress setting... One thing I saw said to delete that registry key. Nothing so far has worked... At this point the problem now appears to be that the Directory Service won't start, but the system says it is failing with no errors. So, I'm uninstalling 5.5 and will reinstall and then restore again. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition did you run isinteg with the patch option? Also what was the exact error message you get in the event log. Search on that as it may have to do with changing the restore in progress setting. From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:59:24 -0400 I just managed to restore via the remote backup. I kept getting errors in the event log but eventually one of them led me to a knowledgebase article that mentioned needing to have NetBIOS over TCP/IP turned on on the servers. Having done that then it worked. However, the Information Store won't start afterward, even with a reboot of the restored server. I'm currently looking through some knowledgebase articles to see if I can figure anything out... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition No. Is this an online backup? Simply re-direct the info store restore to the recovery 5.5 server. You don't need to restore the directory to get at the mailboxes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Hmmm... One more thing... Does the server I'm restoring to require the same name as the old server? Not just the same org and site? Matt -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition I believe I'll need the log files won't I? The restore doesn't work just as-is. Man, I hope my backup guy did his job here... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Can you see the 5.5 server in NTBACKUP on the server with the Admin Gui on it? Otherwise, slap the tape drive on the 5.5 member server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Argh! Trying this IS making my head hurt. I installed to another member server in the same domain as my current Exchange 2000 server. So, both are in an Active Directory domain. I get the same thing with the 5.5 management console... It just can't find the 5.5 server. I was used to seeing this just connect with no problem previously when I had two 5.5 servers going at once. So, what 's the problem here? Some service I didn't
Re: Maximum MDB Database size on Exchange 5.5
You backup to a tape can? - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 1:04 PM Subject: RE: Maximum MDB Database size on Exchange 5.5 That's exactly how I limit it as well. It cant be bigger than a single tape can backup. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum MDB Database size on Exchange 5.5 In theory, it is measured in terabytes. In reality, its something smaller than the maximum usable size of your backup tapes. For instance, with DLT7000 tapes, I get ~65GB on a tape when backing up the databases, so I won't go over that number. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Hilda De Nigris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Maximum MDB Database size on Exchange 5.5 Does anyone know what the required maximum size that Microsoft recommends an Exchange 5.5 Mail database should be? I've heard anything over 100 gigs requires another Mail server. Is that true? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Mongo head hurt. You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5 server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop out those mailboxes to psts and import them into the new server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
Can you see the 5.5 server in NTBACKUP on the server with the Admin Gui on it? Otherwise, slap the tape drive on the 5.5 member server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Argh! Trying this IS making my head hurt. I installed to another member server in the same domain as my current Exchange 2000 server. So, both are in an Active Directory domain. I get the same thing with the 5.5 management console... It just can't find the 5.5 server. I was used to seeing this just connect with no problem previously when I had two 5.5 servers going at once. So, what 's the problem here? Some service I didn't install, something I haven't configured correctly? I'm getting no luck in Microsoft's knowledgebase. This is just a basic install following the instructions Andy gave here... Same org and site as the old server. I installed just the server itself and the management console, and installed it as a non multi-site server. I have no idea if that's the problem. I wouldn't think it would be. Any clue as to why the management console on another server will not pick up this 5.5 server?? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Mongo head hurt. You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5 server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop out those mailboxes to psts and import them into the new server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition
No. Is this an online backup? Simply re-direct the info store restore to the recovery 5.5 server. You don't need to restore the directory to get at the mailboxes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Hmmm... One more thing... Does the server I'm restoring to require the same name as the old server? Not just the same org and site? Matt -Original Message- From: Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition I believe I'll need the log files won't I? The restore doesn't work just as-is. Man, I hope my backup guy did his job here... -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Can you see the 5.5 server in NTBACKUP on the server with the Admin Gui on it? Otherwise, slap the tape drive on the 5.5 member server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Argh! Trying this IS making my head hurt. I installed to another member server in the same domain as my current Exchange 2000 server. So, both are in an Active Directory domain. I get the same thing with the 5.5 management console... It just can't find the 5.5 server. I was used to seeing this just connect with no problem previously when I had two 5.5 servers going at once. So, what 's the problem here? Some service I didn't install, something I haven't configured correctly? I'm getting no luck in Microsoft's knowledgebase. This is just a basic install following the instructions Andy gave here... Same org and site as the old server. I installed just the server itself and the management console, and installed it as a non multi-site server. I have no idea if that's the problem. I wouldn't think it would be. Any clue as to why the management console on another server will not pick up this 5.5 server?? Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 7:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Mongo head hurt. You should be able to setup a new 5.5 server on a member server. Just make sure its got the same OS and Exchange SPs as the original production 5.5 server. Create a new site and org, using the exact same org and site name as the orig 5.5 server. Restore only the info store, pop out those mailboxes to psts and import them into the new server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 5.5 to 2000 Transition Gah! Sorry about hijacking that thread... OK, Migration to Exchange 2000 from 5.5 was a nightmare, but I managed to get MOST of my users to transfer over. Unfortunately, 15 of the 160 did not transfer inexplicably. They now have no mailboxes. Also, even more unfortunately, a couple of them are people who had huge mailboxes and lost a whole lot of data here. I still have my backups from 5.5, but the question is, how the hell do I get any of it back now? The tape drive that was used for those backups was on the same server that is now 2000, and is now in AD where it was in an NT 4 domain before. I tried installing 5.5 on another server and the 5.5 management tools on the upgraded box. Normally that means one can see the existing 5.5 servers and restore or backup data to them remotely. However, the 5.5 management tools cannot see the other server that 5.5 is now installed to. It's in the old domain, whereas the new box is in the new AD domain. Is this the problem? Should I install 5.5 somewhere in my AD domain and try restoring there? Is this a common problem with the 5.5 management tools that they can't go cross-domain to see 5.5 server? I guess any kind of help here would be great since my 15 lost users are having major panic attacks. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: admin@...
Mongo check headers. - Original Message - From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:15 AM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi there, I'm getting more and more virusses coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED], we have no address called [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not even as an alias). I cannot trace where the mails are coming from... Any ideas? kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Not using BLB, But getting really slow backups.
What tape drive are you using? - Original Message - From: Jasa, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:48 AM Subject: Not using BLB, But getting really slow backups. Hello, Veritas 9 - were using version 8 and getting the same problem. Exchange 5.5, NT4 SP6a We can not seem to get better then 100 MB / minute backing up the Exchange servers. using the Exchange agent. Many nights lately it is much worse. The NICs and ports on the switch have all be set to 100/full. IS Maintenance is from 4am - 7am. Ensured that Trend Server Protect is not doing any scheduled scans and that realtime scans exclude Exchange directories. The databases on the 2 servers are not big: One is 25 GBs with 7 GBs of whitespace The other is 17 GBs and only a 300 MBs of whitespace. Nightly oneline defrags are successful. Veritas tech notes point to a fragmented database - I don't buy that unless Exchange IS maintenance is not functioning on both servers. I also have a few other admins that swear by offline defrags - because they always seemed to help. Any ideas where I should be looking? Thanks Ken Jasa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Not using BLB, But getting really slow backups.
With Veritas, you want to make sure hardware compression is enabled and play with the buffer and block sizes a bit under the device options. I think the default is 32K. - Original Message - From: Jasa, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:10 AM Subject: RE: Not using BLB, But getting really slow backups. We are using a Compaq TL891DLX Minilibrary with 2 DLT 40/80 drives. We were getting backup speeds of around 350MB / Min at one point. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions What tape drive are you using? - Original Message - From: Jasa, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:48 AM Subject: Not using BLB, But getting really slow backups. Hello, Veritas 9 - were using version 8 and getting the same problem. Exchange 5.5, NT4 SP6a We can not seem to get better then 100 MB / minute backing up the Exchange servers. using the Exchange agent. Many nights lately it is much worse. The NICs and ports on the switch have all be set to 100/full. IS Maintenance is from 4am - 7am. Ensured that Trend Server Protect is not doing any scheduled scans and that realtime scans exclude Exchange directories. The databases on the 2 servers are not big: One is 25 GBs with 7 GBs of whitespace The other is 17 GBs and only a 300 MBs of whitespace. Nightly oneline defrags are successful. Veritas tech notes point to a fragmented database - I don't buy that unless Exchange IS maintenance is not functioning on both servers. I also have a few other admins that swear by offline defrags - because they always seemed to help. Any ideas where I should be looking? Thanks Ken Jasa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Replying to messages from System Administrator
Do you have Jim McBee's 24seven book handy? I believe its covered in there. - Original Message - From: McBee, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:07 PM Subject: Replying to messages from System Administrator Hi all: I had posted this to the E2K list and no one seemed to know how to do this. In Exchange 5.5, you could configure a SYSTEM address for the System Administrator on one of the mailboxes and whenever anyone managed to reply to a notification message from the System Administrator, it would go to that mailbox. I could have sworn this was possible in Exchange 2000 and that I had done it, but I can't remember how or find any docs on it. I followed some advice in Paul Robichaux's column, but it did not seem to apply to Exchange 2003 and I don't have an E2K server handy to test it on E2K. http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=5088 Any ideas? Thanks much, Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Locking down RPC; winexch2k
Why the need to do this? - Original Message - From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:00 AM Subject: RE: Locking down RPC; winexch2k In an effort to sound stupid... What durn patch? For the recent RPC vulns? Yeah, done. Now, to lock RPC to one port, do I need to do that for all win2k servers or just the ADs, GCs, and Exchange back-end servers? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 16:10 Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Subject: Re: Locking down RPC; winexch2k just apply the durn patch. Sheesh. - Original Message - From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 4:07 PM Subject: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Quick question. When restricting RPC to one known port by adding REG_DWORD TCP/IP Port to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\CurrentControlSet\Services\NTDS\Parameters, does this need to be done on EVERY Win2k server, or just the ADs, GCs, and Exchange Back-End Servers? -Yanek. -- -- This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or privileged. The information contained herein is intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient (or otherwise authorized to receive this message by the intended recipient), any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of the information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message transmission in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Cigital, Inc. accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this email or its contents. Thank You. -- -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or privileged. The information contained herein is intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient (or otherwise authorized to receive this message by the intended recipient), any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of the information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message transmission in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Cigital, Inc. accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this email or its contents. Thank You. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Locking down RPC; winexch2k
IMO, it might make more sense to simply have the FE behind the firewall as well. There are some Exchange specific technet articles on how to configure this however. - Original Message - From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:07 AM Subject: RE: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Unless I'm mistaken, in order to let a front-end server communicate to back-end server servers (exchange and ad), a variety of ports are needed... Including one negotiated port for RPC. Usually this ends up being 1026 on my server, but it's possible to lock it down to one high port and allow that port only through the FW to the internal lan. Yah? Excerpt: If you want the features that require RPCs, such as authentication or implicit logon, but do not want to open the wide range of ports above 1024, you can configure your domain controllers, global catalog servers, and all other back-end servers to use a single known port for all RPC traffic. For more information about how to restrict RPC traffic, see Microsoft Knowledge Base article Q224196, Restricting Active Directory Replication Traffic to a Specific Port (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=3052ID=224196). My question is, does back-end servers above refer only to exchange servers or all win2k servers on the LAN? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:02 Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Subject: Re: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Why the need to do this? - Original Message - From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 11:00 AM Subject: RE: Locking down RPC; winexch2k In an effort to sound stupid... What durn patch? For the recent RPC vulns? Yeah, done. Now, to lock RPC to one port, do I need to do that for all win2k servers or just the ADs, GCs, and Exchange back-end servers? -Yanek. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 16:10 Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Subject: Re: Locking down RPC; winexch2k just apply the durn patch. Sheesh. - Original Message - From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 4:07 PM Subject: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Quick question. When restricting RPC to one known port by adding REG_DWORD TCP/IP Port to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\CurrentControlSet\Services\NTDS\Parameters, does this need to be done on EVERY Win2k server, or just the ADs, GCs, and Exchange Back-End Servers? -Yanek. -- -- This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or privileged. The information contained herein is intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient (or otherwise authorized to receive this message by the intended recipient), any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of the information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message transmission in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Cigital, Inc. accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this email or its contents. Thank You. -- -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or privileged. The information contained herein is intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient (or otherwise authorized to receive this message by the intended recipient), any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of the information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message transmission in error, please
Re: Attachment Blocking/Unblocking via Exchange server
I block at the Gateway using a Dell. - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 12:09 PM Subject: Attachment Blocking/Unblocking via Exchange server Hello All. Windows XP defaults to blocking level 1 attachments. I did my homework on the issue and have found out that this can be changed at either the client or the Exchange server. I was wondering how other Exchange Administrators handle attachment blocking and what your theory on the subject? I do not want to unblock at the server level and want to tell users to Zip files before sending. Level 1 does not block .zip files. Thanks for any comments. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Extracting to pst
Vitamin Fortified Power Control ? - Original Message - From: Aaron Shimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 3:20 AM Subject: Extracting to pst Hi all I have Power Control which I use to extract mailboxes when necessary. But my version only works up to 250 mailboxes. What would you recommend for 250+ mailboxes? Regards Aaron Shimmons Network Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: is there a way to display LinkState?
How about Winroute in the support directory? - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 10:39 AM Subject: is there a way to display LinkState? Exchange servers do all this nice work discovering route failures by sending linkstate probe messages among themselves. But they keep this info to themselves. Wouldn't it be nice if this information could be displayed? Are there any tools out there that do such a visual? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Locking down RPC; winexch2k
just apply the durn patch. Sheesh. - Original Message - From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 4:07 PM Subject: Locking down RPC; winexch2k Quick question. When restricting RPC to one known port by adding REG_DWORD TCP/IP Port to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\CurrentControlSet\Services\NTDS\Parameters, does this need to be done on EVERY Win2k server, or just the ADs, GCs, and Exchange Back-End Servers? -Yanek. This electronic message transmission contains information that may be confidential or privileged. The information contained herein is intended solely for the recipient and use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient (or otherwise authorized to receive this message by the intended recipient), any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of the information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message transmission in error, please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message. Cigital, Inc. accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of this email or its contents. Thank You. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook XP on E2K
Set the format to Plain Text and see if that helps. - Original Message - From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:59 AM Subject: RE: Outlook XP on E2K Nope, they are set to HTML, Instant messaging is disabled... Kind regards, Kim Schotanus === Kim Schotanus Information Systems Manager INTAS Avenue des Arts 58 B-1000 Brussels Belgium T. +32 2 549 01 11 F. +32 2 549 01 56 === -Original Message- From: PF: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: vrijdag 12 september 2003 21:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook XP on E2K I currently have a few users whose outlook blocks there PC's on regular intervals (in that case OUTLOOK.EXE is peaking for 4-5 minutes at 98%) and in other instances they cannot use the buttons in the toolbar (reply etc) Make sure they are not using MS Word as an email editor. I am seeing similar behavior after recent office patches. -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Brick Level Backup
1. 2. 3. - Original Message - From: Aaron Shimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 9:19 AM Subject: Brick Level Backup Hi all What is the best brick level backup software for Exchange 2000? I have gave up on Arcserve as it crashes to many times on critical restores. Any advice welcome. Regards Aaron Shimmons Network Administrator _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003
Sounds stupid, but delete the local admin profile, log back in as admin and try again. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2003 5:47 AM Subject: Permissions problems after upgrading to Windows 2003 Setup; Single DC was Windows 2000 sp4 with Exchange 2000 sp3 on Same Box- no issues. Upgraded to Exchange 2003 - No issues - very nice. Upgraded box now with Windows 2000 and Exchange 2003 and now cannot access System Manager, get error Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager click ok and it quits. Similarly, I cannot access Active Directory Users Computers, it runs ok but when I click on a User object or any object for that matter I get; Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension, Access is denied, Facility Win32, ID No: c0070005, Exchange System Manager I click ok then the MMC quits. This has basically crippled the admin of the system, albeit the Exchange system is actually functioning ok from any client. I get the same errors if I try to administer the domain from a client, signed on as administrator. Clients can log into the domain without issue. The server allows me to do other admin functions as if the admin usercode has the correct privilege. Also, when I run event viewer, it will only let me see the security log, all of the others say, access is denied. If anyone else has seen this, I would appreciate some help. I have only just joined the list so if it has already been discussed, could someone please forward me the thread. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Deckler wrote a book?!?
Anyone know where MEC is this year? - Original Message - From: Robert Moir [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 1:48 PM Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The one about hijacking threads and thinking the world revolves around you? Try googling on Net etiquette or Netiquette. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 15/09/2003 21:43 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Do any of you 2 know anything about my issue? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman Sent: 15 September 2003 21:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? Hear hear. It's not like IT professionals are politicians taking kickbacks and getting thousands and thousands of dollars in gift money. Doctors need a code of ethics because of the nature of their career-path; it's so amazingly easy to ruin someone's life as a doctor (or save it, of course). You tell me where we have such power. Matt -Original Message- From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 4:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? The problem with Deckler's ethics argument, as Andy pointed out, is that by his logic if you have Cisco golf shirt hanging in your closet then you are automatically unethical. Equally absurd is his assertion that lawyers and doctors don't face the same issues -- my mother is a medical professional; she spent 20 years in private medical practice in Los Angeles and I can assure you that there was hardly a pencil holder, ruler or coffee mug in her home that didn't have the name of some pharmaceutical on it. I work for lawyers and I guarantee you that if it's raining hard in downtown Honolulu you will see attorneys crossing the street with Lexis/Nexis and Bank of Hawaii umbrellas. Are we to believe that a tax attorney with a Bank of Hawaii umbrella is unethical because he's going to automatically steer all of his clients to place their investment accounts at BankOH? Greg believes that because I'm a Microsoft MVP that I'm just an unethical front for Microsoft with a massive conflict of interest and thus unable to properly represent any other product. A ludicrous assertion on the face of it: I make no commissions, Microsoft doesn't know or care how often (or if at all) I recommend their products and my MVP status is in no way dependant upon my advocating Microsoft products. Microsoft has not threatened to revoke my status because I have a couple of Linux boxes down the hall. Microsoft MVPs are often some of Microsoft's harshest critics; especially to their faces. The fact is that despite my MVP status my firm is still a WordPerfect shop. I have a handful of very nice ProLaw pens that the sales rep gave me and exactly zero seats of ProLaw installed. I have Symantec hats, pens and Post-It pads...but no Symantec software currently installed. Epson sent me some promotional pens and laser pointers in exchange for receiving literature about their new projectors -- I haven't bought a new projector in about 3 years. If I do, I'll consider Epson along with several other brands. I'm a CNA with no NetWare installed. Maybe I am the rare IT guy with nerves of steel, but the fact is that some vendor giving my knick-knacks, some initials or a free CD of demo software just isn't going to cause me to recommend a solution that I don't believe is the best solution. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Wampler Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? maybe i'm missing something here, but i just read that ethics thing and it looks like this to me if you ask 100 people on the street who is more professional a doctor or it guy, probably everyone would say doctor ergo if it people want to be considered as professional as doctors and get paid similar salaries then we need to create a professional governing body and not have silly things like microsoft certification that would be the equivalent of having pfizer certification as a doctor, which dont make no sense obviously there are some strong feelings about some past history that i have no idea about but the ethics piece looks like a sound argument to me Same old bag of gas. IT consultants are all unprofessional except for me. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ:
Re: Outlook XP on E2K
Apply Latest Office and OS Patches and make sure they do not have the IM thing enabled in Outlook ( Tools/Options/Something) - Original Message - From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 12:49 PM Subject: Outlook XP on E2K I currently have a few users whose outlook blocks there PC's on regular intervals (in that case OUTLOOK.EXE is peaking for 4-5 minutes at 98%) and in other instances they cannot use the buttons in the toolbar (reply etc) I haven't installed any patches or service packs and my AV software is upto date (Scanmail, OfficeScan and ServerProtect from Trend) Does anyone have a clue where I can start looking? (It's about 15 % of the users who have this problem, the others don't) Cheers, and nice WE, TIA, Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
Problem solved! - Original Message - From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:18 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes They cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
If you are running the Licensing Service, disable it. - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:37 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes everyone has the same dns settings due to dhcp would licensing give this error? I see nothing for either in the event logs on the dc or exchange server - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes
So nothing was changed on the servers? Was anything changed on those workstations? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:38 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes cannot find inbox for same users via OWA - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:34 AM Subject: RE: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes This may seem too simple but can they resolve the email servers name. Also try accessing via OWA is that ok. Everytime this comes up it is either a network problem or DNS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions that is the puzzling part . . . auth to different dc's mail on different mail servers different segments/switches on the network - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes Any commonality that you can see among those 60 users? - Original Message - From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Users Cannot Log Into Mailboxes all of a sudden this morning about 60 out of 400 cannot log into the exchange servers via Outlook. The set of folders could not be opened. You do not have permission to log on. NT 4 domain Windows 2000 sp 3 Exchange 5.5 sp4 all servers have operated fine for over 2 years no probs this started this morning have tried: new profile rebooting all dc's turning off nt auth in mail profile mapping the ipc$ to a mail server (says it doesnt exist but it is there) I dont see a named pipes binding as some articles suggest any other ideas Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cant pass a relay test.
Which tests do you fail? Are the test messages actually delivered? - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:51 PM Subject: Cant pass a relay test. Exch 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp4 1 smtp server, 1 mailbox server Have checked the box for 'hosts and clients that sucsessfully authenticate', but yet when I go to abuse.net/relay.html I fail every time. Server started doing this yesterday and was wiped and completly reinstalled not 1 hour ago. This never happened before, i'm thinking about calling PSS. any ideas? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Tell them to hit cancel or send them the Office CD. - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:17 PM Subject: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Hello All. Exchange 2000 OWA Windows XP Desktop After the migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, we starting having reports from OWA users that when they tried to send a message or reply to a message that they were then being prompted to put the Office 2000 CD in. I did my homework and found out that it is because multimedia extensions were installed (by default...I think) during the Exchange 2000 install, and the desktops did not install HTML Source Edit. The original installation of Office 2000 came from the network. Now these machines are outside of the network and cannot access the Office 2000 installation from the network when they are prompted for the install of files. Can I turn off multimedia extensions from the Exchange server and if I do what are the ramifications to that now and in the future? What is the best way to handle this? I have approximately 250 machines with this issue. Thanks in advance for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cant pass a relay test.
Which specific online tests do they fail? - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:58 PM Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test. http://www.abuse.net/relay.html and telneting self testing. But the mails DO NOT appear to deliver. What I dont understand is in the past we have passed these tests. Suddenly I get a email that we are on the ORDB list. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cant pass a relay test. Which tests do you fail? Are the test messages actually delivered? - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:51 PM Subject: Cant pass a relay test. Exch 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp4 1 smtp server, 1 mailbox server Have checked the box for 'hosts and clients that sucsessfully authenticate', but yet when I go to abuse.net/relay.html I fail every time. Server started doing this yesterday and was wiped and completly reinstalled not 1 hour ago. This never happened before, i'm thinking about calling PSS. any ideas? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question
Do they have VPN access? You could put the installation point somewhere on the network and they could browse to it. - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:36 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 2000/OWA Question I did that.not good enough. The people that install the new desktop machines just won't accept that answer and think it is my job to go out to 250 machines and fix them because I was the one that upgraded Exchange and since I upgraded Exchange it hasn't worked...and that in their eyes is my problem. Not so of course but I have to logically put it back in their court. I am trying to come up with reasoning or something they will accept. Thanks for the reply. Samantha -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Tell them to hit cancel or send them the Office CD. - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:17 PM Subject: Exchange 2000/OWA Question Hello All. Exchange 2000 OWA Windows XP Desktop After the migration from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000, we starting having reports from OWA users that when they tried to send a message or reply to a message that they were then being prompted to put the Office 2000 CD in. I did my homework and found out that it is because multimedia extensions were installed (by default...I think) during the Exchange 2000 install, and the desktops did not install HTML Source Edit. The original installation of Office 2000 came from the network. Now these machines are outside of the network and cannot access the Office 2000 installation from the network when they are prompted for the install of files. Can I turn off multimedia extensions from the Exchange server and if I do what are the ramifications to that now and in the future? What is the best way to handle this? I have approximately 250 machines with this issue. Thanks in advance for any help. Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cant pass a relay test.
But its not just one test is it? Arent there something like 8 or 9 variations to see if the relay is indeed open? - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 3:46 PM Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test. Maybe I dont understand your question. They fail the open relay test. I never get a 550, its alway 250 ok. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cant pass a relay test. Which specific online tests do they fail? - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:58 PM Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test. http://www.abuse.net/relay.html and telneting self testing. But the mails DO NOT appear to deliver. What I dont understand is in the past we have passed these tests. Suddenly I get a email that we are on the ORDB list. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cant pass a relay test. Which tests do you fail? Are the test messages actually delivered? - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:51 PM Subject: Cant pass a relay test. Exch 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp4 1 smtp server, 1 mailbox server Have checked the box for 'hosts and clients that sucsessfully authenticate', but yet when I go to abuse.net/relay.html I fail every time. Server started doing this yesterday and was wiped and completly reinstalled not 1 hour ago. This never happened before, i'm thinking about calling PSS. any ideas? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cant pass a relay test.
They also *appear* to fail test 7 BTW. The key is whether they test message is actually delivered or NDR'd. As for receiving an email that you are on the ORDB list... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test. ahhh ok , thanks. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test. Did you check the little box which says that this server normally accepts mail for your domain? It's not an open relay if you use your e-mail address and your mail server accepts mail for it... that is what it is supposed to do. Your server 'fails' test 6, and as the testing data indicates that doesn't necessarily mean it is an open relay... since the message isn't in fact relayed, you aren't an open relay. All Exchange servers 'fail' test 6. -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:46 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Cant pass a relay test. Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test. Maybe I dont understand your question. They fail the open relay test. I never get a 550, its alway 250 ok. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cant pass a relay test. Which specific online tests do they fail? - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:58 PM Subject: RE: Cant pass a relay test. http://www.abuse.net/relay.html and telneting self testing. But the mails DO NOT appear to deliver. What I dont understand is in the past we have passed these tests. Suddenly I get a email that we are on the ORDB list. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cant pass a relay test. Which tests do you fail? Are the test messages actually delivered? - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:51 PM Subject: Cant pass a relay test. Exch 5.5 sp4 on win2k sp4 1 smtp server, 1 mailbox server Have checked the box for 'hosts and clients that sucsessfully authenticate', but yet when I go to abuse.net/relay.html I fail every time. Server started doing this yesterday and was wiped and completly reinstalled not 1 hour ago. This never happened before, i'm thinking about calling PSS. any ideas? e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin
Re: Outlook Express issue.
IE/Tools/Internet Options/Programs - Original Message - From: John Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:34 AM Subject: Outlook Express issue. Hi there. I have a user who is using outlook with Exchange. If he clicks on and email address within an email, it opens an outlook express mail message. Where do I modify the association so the it opens and outlook email message? Thank you. John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet right but the bad thing is it sound's like you had/have your exchange server directly open to the internet bill -Original Message- From: Israel Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet The good thing is that I've recently been testing a VPN concentrator for remote connectivity. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet
I thought the solution was alcohol. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:30 PM Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet It sounds like the former. Anyhow, most ISP's are now blocking port 135. So the solution is VPN or OWA. -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet ok let me see if I read you right here.. you have your exchange server 55 open to the internet...SO a user can directly access it using OL..with NO VPN or other.. just direct??? which means you have 135-139 open to the internet??? (amoung possible other ports??) AND Now these users can't connect to the exchange server with their OL? OR do you mean you are on some type of WAN, VPN ..etc bill -Original Message- From: Israel Carr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Outlook clients can't connect to Exchange 5.5 via Internet I have some remote users who are unable to connect to Exchange via the internet. They can ping the Exchange server via hostname or IP address. Existing users seem to be ok but new users can't seem to connect. Thanks for any ideas. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Drive Removal
I think hiding the M: actually helps prevent lost email and attachments. - Original Message - From: Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:59 PM Subject: M: Drive Removal Hi, If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to ask the masses. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: M: Drive Removal
All your M: belong to us. - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 5:08 PM Subject: Re: M: Drive Removal All Lead Consultants do it. From: Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: M: Drive Removal Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:59:09 -0700 Hi, If I remove the M:\ drive, because we do not need it, outside of the services stopping and starting will client have any impact? Lost email, attachments, etc. I have not seen anything regarding this but wanted to ask the masses. Thanks in advance, Erik L. Vesneski WCDC Intel Lead/Systems Consultant ISO - Intel Systems Ph#: 925-658-6161 www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients
Well, it doenst sound like everything is working fine to me. Ask the technician who is working on that machine what he changed. My guess is he mucked something up in DNS or with that ISA server. I would look through those event logs again. If a user creates a new Outlook Profile can they resolve the server,do a Check Name and access the Exch box? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients This is a small network (15 computers). The exchange server is the GC. Everything is working fine. Everybody accesses the server, and the internet through the ISA server installed there. I can contact with AD. Nothing strange in event viewer. Just can't log in to the exchange mailboxes. Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 1:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients Have you done the usual client/server troubleshooting? Checked to see if you can ping the Exchange server by name and so forth? Can your Exchange server contact a GC in your domain? Anything at all in the Event Viewer? -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients Yes, all the exchange services are up and runing, and the server receives and sends mail. I have a custom recipient redirecting mail to an external e-mail, and if I send an e-mail to that address, I receive it in my external e-mail, so the server is working right. It just doesn't let anyone log into the mailboxes. I even tried to use an IMAP connection, but it failed too... I'm getting a bit desperate here... Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 1:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients Check and make sure that all of the necessary services have started and are running. -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients I just had a new update on this. According to the technician who was taking care of that machine, this started happening when the disk where the exchange server is installed filled up. He deleted some unnecessary files (Instalation CDs copied to the servers disk) to free disk space, and then got 4 gb free space, but the problem continued. When I got to the server, and couldn't identify the problem, I rebooted it. It still doesn't authenticate users... what can be done? Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filipe Joel de Almeida Sent: terça-feira, 9 de Setembro de 2003 0:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can´t log in to exchange with mail clients Hi folks, I'm having a very disturbing problem. My Exchange server starts normaly and logs no errors, but after it starts, I can't use any client to log in. When I try to use a previously well working Outlook client to connect, it says: The attempt to initiate a session in the exchange server failed I have Windows 2000 server, exchange 2000, Norton AVF. This is very urgent, so all help will be appreciated Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Delivery to Alternate MX Records
At least they arent picky about message sizes g 220 ingoio.seanet.com ModusGate ESMTP Receiver Version 2.1.258.0 Ready 250-ingoio.seanet.com 250-SIZE 4872 250-ETRN 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-X-IMS 5 22 250-DSN 250-VRFY 250-AUTH LOGIN 250-AUTH=LOGIN 250 8BITMIME -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Cunningham Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Delivery to Alternate MX Records IMNSHO their logic is screwed. The MX records work as follows Get me a list of MX records for the domain seanet.com [done] Can I connect to highest priority MX record ? Yes = try and send the email No = try next MX record Under Yes, if having trouble sending email , exchange server retries but because server can always connect to highest priority MX record, it will keep choosing to use that one until the message holding peroid for your exchange server times it out and sends the message back to the server. The people at seanet.com need to block port 25 for their server with the highest priority MX record. this will then force the exchange server to use the next available MX record. Whilst not exactly explained see ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2821.txt and http://www.rfc-editor.org for a 452 error your sherver should be (and is ) reacting as follows 4yz Transient Negative Completion reply The command was not accepted, and the requested action did not occur. However, the error condition is temporary and the action may be requested again. The sender should return to the beginning of the command sequence (if any). It is difficult to assign a meaning to transient when two different sites (receiver- and sender-SMTP agents) must agree on the interpretation. Each reply in this category might have a different time value, but the SMTP client is encouraged to try again. A rule of thumb to determine whether a reply fits into the 4yz or the 5yz category (see below) is that replies are 4yz if they can be successful if repeated without any change in command form or in properties of the sender or receiver (that is, the command is repeated identically and the receiver does not put up a new implementation.) cheers dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/09/2003 11:28:04 a.m. Hi All, I'm a bit puzzled by something and I'm hoping that someone can help out. There's a particular domain, seanet.com, that we can't send messages to at the moment. Any message sent to this domain hangs in the IMC queue with the error, 452 4.3.0 Cannot write message to disk. According to this ISP's support group they've recently reconfigured their main mail server so it can no longer receive messages from the outside world, and I assume that the error we're seeing is a result of this reconfiguration. They further claim that our server should try to deliver messages to their second or third mail server, something it definitely isn't doing. So here are my questions. Should an Exchange server (5.5, by the way) try the next MX record after getting a 452 from the primary server, and are there any settings in Exchange that affect this behavior? As an additional philosophical question, does it strike anyone else as strange that they should deliberately put an essentially malfunctioning server at the address of their first MX record in the name of spam fighting and security? -Peter ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delayed Email
Not really that odd! :) Telnet on port 25 from your mail server to theirs and see if you can both connect and send a test message. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delayed Email Hey all, I am getting some odd NDRs for some odd reason. This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. When I go to the SMTP queues the emails in question are in 'Retry' mode. When I check the properties, it states that the reomtes server did not respond to a connection attempt. The reciever is a school and I did an NSLookup, and the name resolves properly. Any ideas? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delayed Email
Actually, their mailserver is : mail.ci.marshfield.wi.us But no, I cant connect there from here either. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delayed Email Could not connect. It just might be something on their end. Or maybe there is and issue with my DNS somewhere? Could someone try the same with ci.marshfield.wi.us I am still not as ripe as I would like to be with all of this, so I do thank you for all of your help. This is what I did at the command prompt: Telnet ci.marshfield.wi.us 25 John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delayed Email Ok, so DNS is probably OK. But is the mail server actually responding. Telnet to port 25 on it and try to manually send a message. -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2003 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delayed Email Hey all, I am getting some odd NDRs for some odd reason. This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY. YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE. Delivery to the following recipients has been delayed. When I go to the SMTP queues the emails in question are in 'Retry' mode. When I check the properties, it states that the reomtes server did not respond to a connection attempt. The reciever is a school and I did an NSLookup, and the name resolves properly. Any ideas? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Icon's and piping username/domain/password.
I dont know. She seems rather goofy to me: http://www.uc.edu/presidentsearch/remarks.htm - Original Message - From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:35 PM Subject: RE: Icon's and piping username/domain/password. I've already expressed the security concerns. They want to use the full blown outlook with each of them having their own icon on the same computer to click on and automatically log them into their separate mailbox. I know...it's scary, but I'm not going to tell the new President of the University no. I feel like a little worm on a big hook (crow). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Icon's and piping username/domain/password. You didn't say whether both of these accounts are regular Exchange accounts or other. If you set her up w/ Outlook Express for that, you can save the authentication in the accounts and all she would have to do is click on the 'send/receive' button. Might still have the issue of separating the mail between the two accounts though. If they are both Exchange server accounts, she can add the other mailbox to her Outlook profile and open them both at the same time. See http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/links.htm#addtobar. Oh, and that 'bother' with putting in login information, in general terms that's a security issue, though some CEOs never heard of the topic. Has something to do with why the @#$% logins and passwords are required in the first place. Sheesh. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Icon's and piping username/domain/password. Exchange 5.5 We have a new president coming into the University who has some unusual requests. She would like to have two separate icons available on her desktop which point to two separate outlook accounts which will pipe in the username/domain/password. One for herself and one for the husband. She does not want to be bothered with typing in login information. Never heard of this request before, so I thought I would post it. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: auto BCC'ing all messages
And there usually is when Martin uses the bathroom. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:21 PM Subject: RE: auto BCC'ing all messages I think that point is that it isn't for you to make that decision. Getting it in writing from HR takes the potential for issues off of you. As an example where I work if there is a request by a manager or another employee to read ones email, it must be signed off on by the CEO and then HR. I made that policy as like I said, it isn't mine or a managers decision on who's email gets read. There needs to be a paper trail. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto BCC'ing all messages Why do you consider it dangerous? This is company hardware, company software and when your hired it's made clear to not use this for personal use. I don't believe there are any legal or ethical problems with reading anyone's e-mail if it originates on my server. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-464-2381 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto BCC'ing all messages This is a dangerous area of potential liability. I would not comply without a written request from HR. It would be good to set up a specific policy for future requests like this. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: auto BCC'ing all messages Has anyone had a request to automatically BCC all messages being sent out of a mailbox also be sent to another user? for example Joe smith is suspected of wrongdoing. His boss Bob doesn't know for sure. So Bob requests that all e-mail's Joe sends also be sent to him. Is this possible? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-464-2381 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem deleting e-mails
Any AV software on the server? - Original Message - From: Adam Berns [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:43 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Shift+Del does not work. It's like the messages just are not in the database, though they show up in the client. They can't be opened, moved, or deleted. Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Are they over their quota? Did you try 'shift-delete'? -Original Message- From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem deleting e-mails When I launch outlook, I see the messages in the inbox, but when I try to delete them, I get the following error: The item could not be deleted. It was either moved or already deleted, or access was denied. If I look at their MBX folder on the M drive, I do see the messages there, but can't delete it from that location either. Any ideas? Exchange 2K sp3 Windows 2K sp4 Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem deleting e-mails
Not in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Paul kondilys [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:46 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Hey Guys, Does anyone know if you can change the SMTP banner for Exchange 5.5? Thanks, Paul -Original Message- From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Shift+Del does not work. It's like the messages just are not in the database, though they show up in the client. They can't be opened, moved, or deleted. Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Are they over their quota? Did you try 'shift-delete'? -Original Message- From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem deleting e-mails When I launch outlook, I see the messages in the inbox, but when I try to delete them, I get the following error: The item could not be deleted. It was either moved or already deleted, or access was denied. If I look at their MBX folder on the M drive, I do see the messages there, but can't delete it from that location either. Any ideas? Exchange 2K sp3 Windows 2K sp4 Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem deleting e-mails
So you disabled it and you still couldnt delete the emails? What AV software are you using? It wouldnt hurt to temporarily disable it on the client as well. Its at least worth a try. - Original Message - From: Adam Berns [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:50 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Already went through that path, no luck... Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Problem deleting e-mails Any AV software on the server? - Original Message - From: Adam Berns [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:43 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Shift+Del does not work. It's like the messages just are not in the database, though they show up in the client. They can't be opened, moved, or deleted. Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Are they over their quota? Did you try 'shift-delete'? -Original Message- From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem deleting e-mails When I launch outlook, I see the messages in the inbox, but when I try to delete them, I get the following error: The item could not be deleted. It was either moved or already deleted, or access was denied. If I look at their MBX folder on the M drive, I do see the messages there, but can't delete it from that location either. Any ideas? Exchange 2K sp3 Windows 2K sp4 Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem deleting e-mails
Or maybe with a Pop3/Imap client. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:03 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Agreed. Also see if you can delete the message in OWA. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Problem deleting e-mails So you disabled it and you still couldnt delete the emails? What AV software are you using? It wouldnt hurt to temporarily disable it on the client as well. Its at least worth a try. - Original Message - From: Adam Berns [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:50 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Already went through that path, no luck... Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Problem deleting e-mails Any AV software on the server? - Original Message - From: Adam Berns [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:43 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Shift+Del does not work. It's like the messages just are not in the database, though they show up in the client. They can't be opened, moved, or deleted. Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Are they over their quota? Did you try 'shift-delete'? -Original Message- From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem deleting e-mails When I launch outlook, I see the messages in the inbox, but when I try to delete them, I get the following error: The item could not be deleted. It was either moved or already deleted, or access was denied. If I look at their MBX folder on the M drive, I do see the messages there, but can't delete it from that location either. Any ideas? Exchange 2K sp3 Windows 2K sp4 Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter
Re: Problem deleting e-mails
Im taking bets what vendor he is using. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:07 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Try uninstalling the AV software. -Original Message- From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:06 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Problem deleting e-mails Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Been there, done that, disabled A/V on the server and the client. Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Problem deleting e-mails So you disabled it and you still couldnt delete the emails? What AV software are you using? It wouldnt hurt to temporarily disable it on the client as well. Its at least worth a try. - Original Message - From: Adam Berns [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:50 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Already went through that path, no luck... Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Problem deleting e-mails Any AV software on the server? - Original Message - From: Adam Berns [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:43 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Shift+Del does not work. It's like the messages just are not in the database, though they show up in the client. They can't be opened, moved, or deleted. Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office -Original Message- From: Edgington, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Are they over their quota? Did you try 'shift-delete'? -Original Message- From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem deleting e-mails When I launch outlook, I see the messages in the inbox, but when I try to delete them, I get the following error: The item could not be deleted. It was either moved or already deleted, or access was denied. If I look at their MBX folder on the M drive, I do see the messages there, but can't delete it from that location either. Any ideas? Exchange 2K sp3 Windows 2K sp4 Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin
Re: Problem deleting e-mails
Oh heck,you see mail servers all the time whose greeting name doesnt match their host name. Thats what you are referring to yes? I suspect most mail servers will not reject mail because of that. You will need to use some sort of relay to accomplish that with 5.5 or as Chris mentioned, I guess you could pay MCS to change it for you. - Original Message - From: Paul kondilys [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:17 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Reason is I'm running AD, and my exchange server is showing up on a .local domainand it's upsetting some other e-mail admins out there So I was wondering if you can change the banner to display that the e-mail server is really exchsvr1.mydomain.com ?? Thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails I never really understand why people want to change it. Yea, I know security, but what does that really help? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails You don't. Put a relay server in front of it that has this feature. -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:46 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Problem deleting e-mails Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Hey Guys, Does anyone know if you can change the SMTP banner for Exchange 5.5? Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem deleting e-mails
Does anyone know where MEC is this year? - Original Message - From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:15 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Maybe a new SMTP banner prevents thread hijacking... -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails I never really understand why people want to change it. Yea, I know security, but what does that really help? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails You don't. Put a relay server in front of it that has this feature. -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:46 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Problem deleting e-mails Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Hey Guys, Does anyone know if you can change the SMTP banner for Exchange 5.5? Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem deleting e-mails
Remind your CIO that the mere fact you are using Exchange probably violates a dozen RFCs as it is. - Original Message - From: Paul kondilys [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:32 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails I really don't have a problem with it actually...but you had to see this one e-mail admin He started e-mailing excerpts from the RFC's rules and guidelines on SMTP regulations and stuffand he even sent it to my CIO Just wondering if it could be done, or just wait till we go to exchange 2000 which resolves that... Thanks -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Problem deleting e-mails Oh heck,you see mail servers all the time whose greeting name doesnt match their host name. Thats what you are referring to yes? I suspect most mail servers will not reject mail because of that. You will need to use some sort of relay to accomplish that with 5.5 or as Chris mentioned, I guess you could pay MCS to change it for you. - Original Message - From: Paul kondilys [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:17 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Reason is I'm running AD, and my exchange server is showing up on a .local domainand it's upsetting some other e-mail admins out there So I was wondering if you can change the banner to display that the e-mail server is really exchsvr1.mydomain.com ?? Thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails I never really understand why people want to change it. Yea, I know security, but what does that really help? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails You don't. Put a relay server in front of it that has this feature. -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:46 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Problem deleting e-mails Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Hey Guys, Does anyone know if you can change the SMTP banner for Exchange 5.5? Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem deleting e-mails
Wag: Maybe RFC2821 4.3.1 ? Though I dont see where is says the greeting name MUST match the hostname. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:47 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Yeah, so I was thinking about what RFCs might be violated when I saw your initial post... I'm not sure that any are violated by your SMTP banner saying whatever the heck you want it to say There might be an RFC that's violated y you saying helo foo.invalid.domain.com in an SMTP conversation, but I looked around and couldn't find one. What RFC snippets is he sending? -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:32 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Problem deleting e-mails Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails I really don't have a problem with it actually...but you had to see this one e-mail admin He started e-mailing excerpts from the RFC's rules and guidelines on SMTP regulations and stuffand he even sent it to my CIO Just wondering if it could be done, or just wait till we go to exchange 2000 which resolves that... Thanks -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Problem deleting e-mails Oh heck,you see mail servers all the time whose greeting name doesnt match their host name. Thats what you are referring to yes? I suspect most mail servers will not reject mail because of that. You will need to use some sort of relay to accomplish that with 5.5 or as Chris mentioned, I guess you could pay MCS to change it for you. - Original Message - From: Paul kondilys [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:17 PM Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Reason is I'm running AD, and my exchange server is showing up on a .local domainand it's upsetting some other e-mail admins out there So I was wondering if you can change the banner to display that the e-mail server is really exchsvr1.mydomain.com ?? Thanks -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails I never really understand why people want to change it. Yea, I know security, but what does that really help? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails You don't. Put a relay server in front of it that has this feature. -Original Message- From: Paul kondilys [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:46 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Problem deleting e-mails Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Hey Guys, Does anyone know if you can change the SMTP banner for Exchange 5.5? Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang
RE: Problem deleting e-mails
Recreating the mailbox is the last resort for me. Please tell us what AV software you are using. We gots to know. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Berns Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Problem Solved: Deleted the mailbox, and then re-created it... Sometimes the simple way is the last one to come to mind... Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office -Original Message- From: Adam Berns Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Sorry, management thinks meetings are necessary for some reason... I've seen all of those, and even rolled up SPs, but that did not fix it, I will try the exmerge thing., if that does not work, time to do it the hard way. Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problem deleting e-mails Any one of these get you going in the right direction? (I am betting it's this first one) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;817886 817886 - Error Message: Some Items Could Not Be Deleted. They Were Either Moved or Already Deleted, or Access Was Denied. I get this error all the time, when trying to select and delete more than 3,500-4,000 messages at a time...don't care what MS says, shift+delete doesn't work either. The only thing that works is to reselect a smaller number of items. This error doesn't just affect OL2003 either...I've gotten it and seen users get it since OL97. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;195863 195863 - OL2000: (CW) ErrMsg: The Item Could Not Be Deleted http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;326396 326396 - XADM: Cannot Delete or Move Messages in Messaging Client http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;325445 325445 - XADM: You Cannot Soft Delete or Move Messages If the Mailbox Is Over Its Quota Limit and You Use a Store Event Sink -Original Message- From: Adam Berns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problem deleting e-mails When I launch outlook, I see the messages in the inbox, but when I try to delete them, I get the following error: The item could not be deleted. It was either moved or already deleted, or access was denied. If I look at their MBX folder on the M drive, I do see the messages there, but can't delete it from that location either. Any ideas? Exchange 2K sp3 Windows 2K sp4 Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mass Mailings
Didnt take kindly to your pink dress did they? - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Mass Mailings No offense, you're not the city of San Antonio. The city of San Antonio might send out unwanted mail admittedly[1], but UCE might be a tough one to pin on them. They probably would be a reasonably trustworthy opt-out sender as well (except for that damn San Antonio police department, which still won't let me back into the city). [1] Hey, I never signed up for the San Antonio Light and Power newsletter! -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:36 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Mass Mailings Subject: RE: Mass Mailings I wouldn't be so sure of that. I just received a rather unkind note from my ISP for a UCE blast that was sent out from here without my prior knowledge. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 7:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Mailings Your ISP isn't going to do anything; you're the city of San Antonio. But a sub-domain with its own originating IP does help in case that gets blacklisted by $random moron. You could get blacklisted no matter how careful you are just because there are idiots out there who will use any random blacklist that just happens to exist... and some of them are managed by.. well, as part of my kinder/gentler persona I'll stop there. The monthly San Antonio Parks Rec newsletter is highly unlikely to be seen as spam IMO. -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:12 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Mass Mailings Subject: RE: Mass Mailings I'am more concerned about being blacklisted also as Martin stated mass mail through my ISP (SBC). Should I consider setting up an additional domain/server to accomplish this in order to avoid being blacklisted or are there any other ways to get around this? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Mass Mailings [1]I've sent such things though Exchange before... no problems in terms of volume, but you may consider a majordomo or mailman (or similar) box and a sub-domain of @lists.sanantonio.gov to manage such mailings. [1] Hi Chris! -Original Message- From: Chris Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 7:46 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Mass Mailings Subject: Mass Mailings Hello All- We currently have a division that is requesting to be able to send mass mails through our server to opt-in recipients of a monthly newsletter, this would be upwards of 70,000 pieces per month and will increase as required. My question is has anyone received similar requests and how were they handled? The division head assures me that this list will be maintained and kept up to date and users who request to be removed from the list will be, they currently outsource this project and want to bring it in-house to save money. I believe in the long run this will cause more problems than the savings will add up to, any suggestions would be appreciated. TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO not working
That article was created for the one person who still runs the license logging service. - Original Message - From: Mark Nold [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:58 PM Subject: RE: OOO not working Forgot to mention that: no I have not reached my CAL's either. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;811912 -Original Message- From: Mark Nold Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 11:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOO not working Forgive if this is a repeat, and yes I know that most don't agree with OOO, BUT, with that said: Ex2000 SP3 Win2k SP3 OL XP SP1 My company allows OOO replies to go to the i-net. All was fine when I went away for an extended vacation. Now upon my return, it appears that no ones OOO works. I have tested against many accounts and I get no replies, internal or external. I have searched TechNet, goggle and only found items relevant to 5.5 and/or alternate recipientsneither of which apply to me users. I have seen before in this list references to not allowing OOO. I'm wondering if my substitute started messing with things, but he swears he did not. Where would I (is there somewhere) look in ESM to allow/disallow OOO globally? I have looked through my event logs and see nothing that is glaring at me...no errors, only information about the cleanup the night before. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Mark _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: auto BCC'ing all messages
That wont take care of the mail sent by Joe. This sounds like a HR issue, nonetheless, Patrick, look up Message Journaling in Technet. - Original Message - From: Jasa, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 4:10 PM Subject: RE: auto BCC'ing all messages You can use the alternate recipient under delivery options of the mailbox to have a copy sent elsewhere - Joe won't have a clue. KJ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Has anyone had a request to automatically BCC all messages being sent out of a mailbox also be sent to another user? for example Joe smith is suspected of wrongdoing. His boss Bob doesn't know for sure. So Bob requests that all e-mail's Joe sends also be sent to him. Is this possible? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-464-2381 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access Problems
None of three methods work for you? A denial will take precedence over an allowed permission. - Original Message - From: Adam Berns [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:16 PM Subject: RE: Access Problems I looked at those, but the only mailbox on the M drive that I can get into is folder for that exchange server's sa mailbox. How do I get into all of them is the problem. In the exchange admin I look at the security tab for that server, and look at the permissions for the enterprise admins, and I do have full permission (inherited). Any other ideas? Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Access Problems Someone mucked around with the default permissions and now has corrected their mistake: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262054 We used to be able to get into anybodies mailbox on exchange2k. Either through and outlook client, or through the m drive directly. For some reason, we can no longer do that. But I can not find anything that has changed. I just picked up this infrastructure, and really have no ideas on how it was all put together. Any ideas on what might be going on here? Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Enterprise upgrade
Quite simply, setup cant verify the service account. Either something is screwy with the account or your network setup. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JCalero Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 5:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Enterprise upgrade I am upgrading from standard to enterprise edition of Exchange 5.5 after the setup screen displaying setup is making sure system is ready for installation the setup hangs also if I try to apply service pack 4 this bombs out with an error no mapping betwean account names and security ID's was done ID no: 0xc0020534 any idea? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Access Problems
Someone mucked around with the default permissions and now has corrected their mistake: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262054 We used to be able to get into anybodies mailbox on exchange2k. Either through and outlook client, or through the m drive directly. For some reason, we can no longer do that. But I can not find anything that has changed. I just picked up this infrastructure, and really have no ideas on how it was all put together. Any ideas on what might be going on here? Adam Berns Sr. Systems Administrator Remedy, a BMC Software Company 650-919-5966 Office _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115'
Anyone using Outlook 2003? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alverson, Tom Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' One other thing -- I have the phonelist web page set up on the server that uses CDO to present a web page view of the exchange server GAL along with pictures and this is working just fine (until inetinfo is crashed by the OWA code) Tom -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 12:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Try stopping IIS web services and deleting all the files in exchsrvr\webtemp. -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 09:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA just quit after years of running - error 'ASP 0115' Our OWA server for exchange 5.5 sp4 is running on an NT4 box separate from our exchange servers. The old exchange server is running nt4sp6a and exchange 5.5 sp4. The new exchange server (that all the mailboxes are now on) is on windows 2000 sp3 and exchange 5.5 sp4. A user just told me today that OWA quit working 2 days ago. I tried it today and just got a blank screen (no web page ever loaded). I rebooted the server and it worked briefly but soon will fail with an ASP 0115 error. For example, after rebooting, I try to log in and get the name PW prompt, and then see my inbox OK, but when I click on a message I usually get the following error: error 'ASP 0115' Unexpected error /exchange/USA/root.asp A trappable error occurred in an external object. The script cannot continue running. I looked at the knowledgebase article and there are a whole bunch of things to check, but this server has been running fine for years and has never had this problem. No changes were made recently and the even log is clean over the last 3 days except for after I rebooted it and I get the ASP error, it logs Event ID 5: Error: File /exchange/USA/root.asp Unexpected error For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp. I also see a new W3SVC error with event ID 105 that says: The server was unable to register the administration tool discovery information. The administration tool may not be able to see this server. The data is the error code. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp I have no idea what this one means or if it is related. Has anyone seen this type of error or have any suggestions on what to try first? I am thinking of re-applying exchange SP4 on the OWA machine as I can reboot that at any time (especially since it is not working very well). I also noticed that after reboot the WWW publishing service is not always started and I have to manually start it (it is set to automatic). Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Strange OWA behaviour
Sounds like someone has enabled directory browsing on the Exch virtual directory. - Original Message - From: Rui Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:43 AM Subject: Strange OWA behaviour Hi all. Suddenly my OWA stopped functioning. Now when I open my browser (IE 6.0 SP1) and go to the OWA site I get a directory listing with folders for each of my organisation users. Any idea? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
Using newprof? - Original Message - From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:07 AM Subject: Exchange 5.5 with XP client We are currently upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows XP workstations. We are still running Exchange 5.5. Several of our users are receiving the following error message when they log in, but before they even open Outlook 2002. Microsoft Outlook Profile Generation Utility has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. If you were in the middle of something, the information you were working on might be lost. Please tell Microsoft about this problem. The users just close the error message dialog box and open Outlook with no problems. Has anybody seen this issue? Thanks Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 with XP client
No and no. - Original Message - From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 with XP client We must be using newprof. I never set it up. Is it necessary? Does everybody else use it? Robert -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 with XP client Using newprof? - Original Message - From: McCready, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:07 AM Subject: Exchange 5.5 with XP client We are currently upgrading some of our NT 4.0 workstations to Windows XP workstations. We are still running Exchange 5.5. Several of our users are receiving the following error message when they log in, but before they even open Outlook 2002. Microsoft Outlook Profile Generation Utility has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. If you were in the middle of something, the information you were working on might be lost. Please tell Microsoft about this problem. The users just close the error message dialog box and open Outlook with no problems. Has anybody seen this issue? Thanks Robert *** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** This electronic mail message and any attachments to this electronic mail message contain confidential information belonging to the originator, and may be attorney client privileged or constitute inside information. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s) listed as the recipient(s). If you are not one of the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of the electronically mailed information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail message in error, please forward the electronic mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then remove all traces of the electronic mail message from your system. *** The Dayton Power Light Company. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue?
- Original Message - From: John Orban [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:58 AM Subject: RE: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue? I'm sorry, it's backing up in the outbound queue (outbound messages awaiting deliver). Looking at the messages usually indicates a name resolution issue which, of course, is DNS. But I don't understand why it (DNS) would just stop working. I've got my main Active Directory server (which is also my main file and print server) running DNS. I have a static IP address on the Exchange server pointing to the DNS server as the primary and then to my ISP's DNS servers as secondary (and tertiary). You know I'm also getting messages from the Exchange listserv that my account is on hold. I know Ed looked into this earlier and noticed something wonky but I was never able to figure out how to resolve it. Right now I'm answering this on the Swynk website since I'm not receiving messages again from the group. I did find a post through Google that said I should restart the MTA as well as the IMC. But I'm thinking if this is a DNS issue that's not going to help. But then, I don't understand why rebooting the computer helps since DNS is on a completely different machine. The DNS Event log on my DNS server is clean there are only informational events, nothing even remotely resembling anything wrong with DNS on that machine, so it's GOT to be localized to the Exchange server. I see nothing in either the Application or System logs in the Event viewer prior to this problem that gives me any clues. Thanks for any thoughts. John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue?
Certainly sounds like DNS to me. When you do nslookups from the Exch Server, what server does it attempt to contact and can it successfully resolve external names? - Original Message - From: John Orban [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:58 AM Subject: RE: What causes mail to back up in the IMS queue? I'm sorry, it's backing up in the outbound queue (outbound messages awaiting deliver). Looking at the messages usually indicates a name resolution issue which, of course, is DNS. But I don't understand why it (DNS) would just stop working. I've got my main Active Directory server (which is also my main file and print server) running DNS. I have a static IP address on the Exchange server pointing to the DNS server as the primary and then to my ISP's DNS servers as secondary (and tertiary). You know I'm also getting messages from the Exchange listserv that my account is on hold. I know Ed looked into this earlier and noticed something wonky but I was never able to figure out how to resolve it. Right now I'm answering this on the Swynk website since I'm not receiving messages again from the group. I did find a post through Google that said I should restart the MTA as well as the IMC. But I'm thinking if this is a DNS issue that's not going to help. But then, I don't understand why rebooting the computer helps since DNS is on a completely different machine. The DNS Event log on my DNS server is clean there are only informational events, nothing even remotely resembling anything wrong with DNS on that machine, so it's GOT to be localized to the Exchange server. I see nothing in either the Application or System logs in the Event viewer prior to this problem that gives me any clues. Thanks for any thoughts. John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
I'm shocked! g - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:56 AM Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 An update for all those following this thread. Last night we separated the Exchange server from the main backup job and both ran flawlessly. Amazing. Wonder what Veritas will have to say about that... Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Yup. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Have you tried to uninstall the Agent then reinstall? Just a thought... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Have you had such success from day one? Were there issues in the beginning and, if so, what solutions did you put in place? Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 We're using BE9.0 as well and back up a total of about 10 servers. The Exchange server is the last one on the list, and we have never had it fail. Backup rate is SWEET! As well. Sitting pretty at about 850mb/min with Exchange. Love that SDLT tape drive! Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:02 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Subject: Re: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Yea, we went through all that as well. I got tired of trying to explain it to my duck. Creating the separate job was the only solution, silly as it sounds.. - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:35 PM Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Tried that. The job just failed earlier. Unfortunately, one of the changes to BEX9 includes using NDMP for agent communications. A side affect is that, communications failures with one agent can cause the entire job to fail from that point. Example, Exchange server third out of 15, first 2 servers backup successfully, Exchange gets error, job throws up hands in confusion and doesn't attempt to backup any other servers. 13 servers fail... Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Maybe just changing the order would work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no problems backing up the store alone with Backup Exec. Problem seems only to happen when backing up all (15 total) servers in one job. Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a separate job and I'm still waiting for it to complete. Will update the list with results. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger
RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
Can you back up the store from that same server using NTBACKUP? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Beckwith Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Exchange 2000 Server - SP3 running on Windows Server (DC) 2000 - SP4 Question: Running BackupExec 9.0 Build 4454 (the latest) and have been getting the following error almost exclusively during the Exchange server portion of the backup. Final error code: a00084f8 HEX Final error description: A timeout occurred waiting for data from the agent during operation shutdown. We have been working with support for a couple months and they keep pointing at network problems but aren't offering much more help on what types of problems to look for. As far as we can tell we are a standard network setup; Windows 2000 Active Directory, all up to date on service packs; one Exchange server and one SQL server (separate machines); no apparent network problems or bottlenecks in everyday operations. We've tried setting the ports explicitly to 100mb Full duplex at the Exchange server, backup server and switch ports. We tried stopping our ScanMail application also and verified that none of the Exchange maintenance tasks were running at the time of the backup. Is there anyone out there that might be able to offer any more suggestions on how to troubleshoot these problems? We are not getting reliable backups and are looking for whatever help we can find. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
Blimy! I had the same problems with 8.6. Different error message, but it would fail at least 2 times a week when it was part of a bigger job. I wound up separating it and by itself it ran fine. Forgot completely about that. Never could explain why. - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:43 AM Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no problems backing up the store alone with Backup Exec. Problem seems only to happen when backing up all (15 total) servers in one job. Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a separate job and I'm still waiting for it to complete. Will update the list with results. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Other than Andy's suggestion of trying NTBackup, have you looked to see that the Backup Exec agent is running with sufficient rights? SP4 for Win2k changes some of the permissions levels to better match Win2k3's permissions model, and quite specifically it changes network permissions. Windows 2000 .Net magazine had a web article about it not too long ago, which I stumbled across the other day. http://www.win2000mag.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=39534 From the article: One end result is that some programs, plus services not under control of svchost.exe, might not behave as expected when they logon with an account that does not have the 'Impersonate a client after authentication' right. I wonder if that's not the cause of the issue. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Exchange 2000 Server - SP3 running on Windows Server (DC) 2000 - SP4 Question: Running BackupExec 9.0 Build 4454 (the latest) and have been getting the following error almost exclusively during the Exchange server portion of the backup. Final error code: a00084f8 HEX Final error description: A timeout occurred waiting for data from the agent during operation shutdown. We have been working with support for a couple months and they keep pointing at network problems but aren't offering much more help on what types of problems to look for. As far as we can tell we are a standard network setup; Windows 2000 Active Directory, all up to date on service packs; one Exchange server and one SQL server (separate machines); no apparent network problems or bottlenecks in everyday operations. We've tried setting the ports explicitly to 100mb Full duplex at the Exchange server, backup server and switch ports. We tried stopping our ScanMail application also and verified that none of the Exchange maintenance tasks were running at the time of the backup. Is there anyone out there that might be able to offer any more suggestions on how to troubleshoot these problems? We are not getting reliable backups and are looking for whatever help we can find. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9
Yea, we went through all that as well. I got tired of trying to explain it to my duck. Creating the separate job was the only solution, silly as it sounds.. - Original Message - From: Ray Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:35 PM Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Tried that. The job just failed earlier. Unfortunately, one of the changes to BEX9 includes using NDMP for agent communications. A side affect is that, communications failures with one agent can cause the entire job to fail from that point. Example, Exchange server third out of 15, first 2 servers backup successfully, Exchange gets error, job throws up hands in confusion and doesn't attempt to backup any other servers. 13 servers fail... Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Maybe just changing the order would work -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 No problems backing up the store with NT Backup. In fact, no problems backing up the store alone with Backup Exec. Problem seems only to happen when backing up all (15 total) servers in one job. Last night we tried separating out the Exchange backup in a separate job and I'm still waiting for it to complete. Will update the list with results. Thanks...Ray Thought for the day: A good rule of thumb is if you've made it to thirty-five and your job still requires you to wear a name tag, you've made a serious vocational error. --Dennis Miller -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 4:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Other than Andy's suggestion of trying NTBackup, have you looked to see that the Backup Exec agent is running with sufficient rights? SP4 for Win2k changes some of the permissions levels to better match Win2k3's permissions model, and quite specifically it changes network permissions. Windows 2000 .Net magazine had a web article about it not too long ago, which I stumbled across the other day. http://www.win2000mag.net/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=39534 From the article: One end result is that some programs, plus services not under control of svchost.exe, might not behave as expected when they logon with an account that does not have the 'Impersonate a client after authentication' right. I wonder if that's not the cause of the issue. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Timeout Errors Backing up Exchange 2000 with Backup Exec 9 Exchange 2000 Server - SP3 running on Windows Server (DC) 2000 - SP4 Question: Running BackupExec 9.0 Build 4454 (the latest) and have been getting the following error almost exclusively during the Exchange server portion of the backup. Final error code: a00084f8 HEX Final error description: A timeout occurred waiting for data from the agent during operation shutdown. We have been working with support for a couple months and they keep pointing at network problems but aren't offering much more help on what types of problems to look for. As far as we can tell we are a standard network setup; Windows 2000 Active Directory, all up to date on service packs; one Exchange server and one SQL server (separate machines); no apparent network problems or bottlenecks in everyday operations. We've tried setting the ports explicitly to 100mb Full duplex at the Exchange server, backup server and switch ports. We tried stopping our ScanMail application also and verified that none of the Exchange maintenance tasks were running at the time of the backup. Is there anyone out there that might be able to offer any more suggestions on how to troubleshoot these problems? We are not getting reliable backups and are looking for whatever help we can find. _ List posting FAQ:
RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files
Holy Wrap! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Woods, Tony Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files Well I found this (http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-gate.nsf/361fc4a260e563b1882568180 069e1c0/1fc97a6e7009068388256bd0007e4f86?OpenDocumentprod=Norton%20AntiViru s%20for%20Microsoft%20Exchangever=2.xsrc=entpcode=nav_exchangedtype=corp svy=prev=miniver=nav-ms-exchange2) from NAV that says it should allow ZIP files through if it's password protected but it didn't. I tried both 1 and 0 for the entry but it still got stopped. I tried rar files, password protected and it got through, no problems. I then tried a non pasword protected rar file and it to got through. How interesting... Cheers, Tony -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NAV Blocking ZIP files You have to turn off scan compressed, also if you password protect a zip, then again another setting is to turf encrypted files, turn off that too. Or go with RAR, I don't think NAV can read RAR's :) -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 15:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: NAV Blocking ZIP files Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on mix of NT 4 and w2k boxes. I recently put the reg tweaks in for Martin's List of Danger attachments using NAV 2.x for Exchange and have noticed that even though a ZIP file is not listed in my list, the .exe's and .bat's...etc inside them are getting quarantined. This is really pissing off my software developers. Now I know this is because I've got it set to scan within compressed attachments but I'm wondering if either I'm missing an extra reg key so that it ignores them (if they're not viral) or is there something else I'm not aware of that I can do. If it's all I can do, then I don't mind going to battle with them for it but I thought I would ask the group first. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
From within Citrix, its simply a matter of copying over the file you need to work on to your local drive on the laptop. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:11 PM Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Makes laptop use a little tough though. From: Hague, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:23:15 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Definitely more costly but it really works well. The setup and configuration aspects alone (client-side anyway) are much simpler and the performance is probably much better than a straight VPN solution. I think if you look it at all the factors there is a positive ROI. Jeff -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 9:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue That's certainly an option, but a much more costly one IMHO. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Have you considered Terminal Server or (better yet) Citrix? This works wonders for us - full Outlook Exchange as well as all the other apps we run. We only have a dozen or so users so far but my understanding is that Terminal by itself on one decent server (dual Xeon 2.0GHz/1.5GB RAM) is fine for 20 or so clients simultaneously. Beyond that, Citrix on top of Terminal is the way to go. Citrix also provides better support for local printers, sound cards, etc plus a host of additional functionality. Either 1 requires only a single port through the firewall which hasnt been blocked by any ISPs (yet?) and the traffic is already encrypted although I dont imagine its as tight as most VPN solutions. The other thing we found so convenient is the Advanced Terminal client which is simply a web page that loads the client software through an ActiveX control in an IE session. The directions to get our clients set up was litterally go to .whatever.com and follow the instructions. There is some work to do getting the apps set up properly but common apps like Outlook, Word and Excel are very well documented. Getting our custom apps running wasnt near as difficult as I had expected either. The big trick for us is handling profiles because some of our clients can not have access to certain apps that other clients need so we had to modify some profiles manually but with so few clients it hasnt been a big deal. Jeff Hague MCSE Network Manager Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: Hank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Port 135 and Exchange Issue We are trying to recover from ISPs closing down port 135. We have an dedicated Exchange Server at a hosting company. 20 of our 23 people scattered around the country can not use the full functionality of Outlook/Exchange because of this problem. We are a classic case study of how a company has suceeded in business by using most of the functionality of Outlook/Exchange. We built our 3 year old company's communications, task management, and database using the Exchange Platform, including extensive use of custom 'forms' that track hundreds of tasks and our workflow. The ISP's closing out port 135 has brought us to our knees. We are scambling just trying to stay on schedule with our committments to our clients. I have no hope that the ISPs will turn open up 135 again, so I also need an alternative way to connect to the *full* functionality we had before, or be forced to migrate completely off exchange and rebuild our entire infrastructure using another platform. We have tried to implement a VPN solution, but now realize that unless we run the connection on our client and have a full internet connection at the same time, this will not work for us. We do not know how to do this. We must have full access to the internet and exchange at the same time because of the nature of our service we provide. Any ideas? Regards, Hank _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
Of course, this being an Exchange list, Im pretty sure you meant it was tough using Outlook locally on a laptop with Citrix. Sure enough it is. Well, in fact, its damn near impossible. We have both VPN and Citrix here and since we implemented Citrix, none of the laptop users use the VPN anymore or sync their files offline. For the end-user, Citrix is a no-brainer it seems. - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:48 AM Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue From within Citrix, its simply a matter of copying over the file you need to work on to your local drive on the laptop. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:11 PM Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Makes laptop use a little tough though. From: Hague, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:23:15 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Definitely more costly but it really works well. The setup and configuration aspects alone (client-side anyway) are much simpler and the performance is probably much better than a straight VPN solution. I think if you look it at all the factors there is a positive ROI. Jeff -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 9:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue That's certainly an option, but a much more costly one IMHO. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Have you considered Terminal Server or (better yet) Citrix? This works wonders for us - full Outlook Exchange as well as all the other apps we run. We only have a dozen or so users so far but my understanding is that Terminal by itself on one decent server (dual Xeon 2.0GHz/1.5GB RAM) is fine for 20 or so clients simultaneously. Beyond that, Citrix on top of Terminal is the way to go. Citrix also provides better support for local printers, sound cards, etc plus a host of additional functionality. Either 1 requires only a single port through the firewall which hasnt been blocked by any ISPs (yet?) and the traffic is already encrypted although I dont imagine its as tight as most VPN solutions. The other thing we found so convenient is the Advanced Terminal client which is simply a web page that loads the client software through an ActiveX control in an IE session. The directions to get our clients set up was litterally go to .whatever.com and follow the instructions. There is some work to do getting the apps set up properly but common apps like Outlook, Word and Excel are very well documented. Getting our custom apps running wasnt near as difficult as I had expected either. The big trick for us is handling profiles because some of our clients can not have access to certain apps that other clients need so we had to modify some profiles manually but with so few clients it hasnt been a big deal. Jeff Hague MCSE Network Manager Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: Hank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Port 135 and Exchange Issue We are trying to recover from ISPs closing down port 135. We have an dedicated Exchange Server at a hosting company. 20 of our 23 people scattered around the country can not use the full functionality of Outlook/Exchange because of this problem. We are a classic case study of how a company has suceeded in business by using most of the functionality of Outlook/Exchange. We built our 3 year old company's communications, task management, and database using the Exchange Platform, including extensive use of custom 'forms' that track hundreds of tasks and our workflow. The ISP's closing out port 135 has brought us to our knees. We are scambling just trying to stay on schedule with our committments to our clients. I have no hope that the ISPs will turn open up 135 again, so I also need an alternative way to connect to the *full* functionality we had before, or be forced to migrate completely off exchange and rebuild our entire infrastructure using another platform. We have tried to implement a VPN solution, but now realize that unless we run the connection on our client and have a full internet connection at the same time, this will not work for us. We do not know how to do this. We must have full
Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
Other than offline mail, there really is no difference. I dont know too many laptop users who have a TS or Citrix client installed and nothing else. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:08 AM Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue But now that nice laptop you use to do your work on a plane or when you are offline is just a terminal, and you have no offline mail or anything I'm not saying TS doesn't have its place, I'm just mentioning that for someone who is used to taking their office with them may not appreciate those changes. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 4:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue From within Citrix, its simply a matter of copying over the file you need to work on to your local drive on the laptop. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:11 PM Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Makes laptop use a little tough though. From: Hague, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:23:15 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Definitely more costly but it really works well. The setup and configuration aspects alone (client-side anyway) are much simpler and the performance is probably much better than a straight VPN solution. I think if you look it at all the factors there is a positive ROI. Jeff -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 9:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue That's certainly an option, but a much more costly one IMHO. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Have you considered Terminal Server or (better yet) Citrix? This works wonders for us - full Outlook Exchange as well as all the other apps we run. We only have a dozen or so users so far but my understanding is that Terminal by itself on one decent server (dual Xeon 2.0GHz/1.5GB RAM) is fine for 20 or so clients simultaneously. Beyond that, Citrix on top of Terminal is the way to go. Citrix also provides better support for local printers, sound cards, etc plus a host of additional functionality. Either 1 requires only a single port through the firewall which hasnt been blocked by any ISPs (yet?) and the traffic is already encrypted although I dont imagine its as tight as most VPN solutions. The other thing we found so convenient is the Advanced Terminal client which is simply a web page that loads the client software through an ActiveX control in an IE session. The directions to get our clients set up was litterally go to .whatever.com and follow the instructions. There is some work to do getting the apps set up properly but common apps like Outlook, Word and Excel are very well documented. Getting our custom apps running wasnt near as difficult as I had expected either. The big trick for us is handling profiles because some of our clients can not have access to certain apps that other clients need so we had to modify some profiles manually but with so few clients it hasnt been a big deal. Jeff Hague MCSE Network Manager Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: Hank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Port 135 and Exchange Issue We are trying to recover from ISPs closing down port 135. We have an dedicated Exchange Server at a hosting company. 20 of our 23 people scattered around the country can not use the full functionality of Outlook/Exchange because of this problem. We are a classic case study of how a company has suceeded in business by using most of the functionality of Outlook/Exchange. We built our 3 year old company's communications, task management, and database using the Exchange Platform, including extensive use of custom 'forms' that track hundreds of tasks and our workflow. The ISP's closing out port 135 has brought us to our knees. We are scambling just trying to stay on schedule with our committments to our clients. I have no hope that the ISPs will turn open up 135 again, so I also need an alternative way to connect to the *full* functionality we had before, or be forced to migrate completely off exchange and rebuild our entire infrastructure using
Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
well, if you have wireless, you arent really offline then! But I agree for the most part. Citrix has been a big hit with the users here, especially with the NFuse front-end. - Original Message - From: Hague, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:44 AM Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Unless your on a flight with wireless Internet access, that laptop would be just as useful for e-mail whether your using MAPI, POP3 or Terminal... There are certainly ways to work offline regardless of the type of connection you use when your online. Jeff -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Other than offline mail, there really is no difference. I dont know too many laptop users who have a TS or Citrix client installed and nothing else. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:08 AM Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue But now that nice laptop you use to do your work on a plane or when you are offline is just a terminal, and you have no offline mail or anything I'm not saying TS doesn't have its place, I'm just mentioning that for someone who is used to taking their office with them may not appreciate those changes. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 4:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue From within Citrix, its simply a matter of copying over the file you need to work on to your local drive on the laptop. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:11 PM Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Makes laptop use a little tough though. From: Hague, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:23:15 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Definitely more costly but it really works well. The setup and configuration aspects alone (client-side anyway) are much simpler and the performance is probably much better than a straight VPN solution. I think if you look it at all the factors there is a positive ROI. Jeff -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 9:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue That's certainly an option, but a much more costly one IMHO. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Have you considered Terminal Server or (better yet) Citrix? This works wonders for us - full Outlook Exchange as well as all the other apps we run. We only have a dozen or so users so far but my understanding is that Terminal by itself on one decent server (dual Xeon 2.0GHz/1.5GB RAM) is fine for 20 or so clients simultaneously. Beyond that, Citrix on top of Terminal is the way to go. Citrix also provides better support for local printers, sound cards, etc plus a host of additional functionality. Either 1 requires only a single port through the firewall which hasnt been blocked by any ISPs (yet?) and the traffic is already encrypted although I dont imagine its as tight as most VPN solutions. The other thing we found so convenient is the Advanced Terminal client which is simply a web page that loads the client software through an ActiveX control in an IE session. The directions to get our clients set up was litterally go to .whatever.com and follow the instructions. There is some work to do getting the apps set up properly but common apps like Outlook, Word and Excel are very well documented. Getting our custom apps running wasnt near as difficult as I had expected either. The big trick for us is handling profiles because some of our clients can not have access to certain apps that other clients need so we had to modify some profiles manually but with so few clients it hasnt been a big deal. Jeff Hague MCSE Network Manager Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: Hank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Port 135 and Exchange Issue We are trying to recover from ISPs closing down port 135. We have an dedicated Exchange Server at a hosting company. 20 of our 23 people scattered around the country can not use the full functionality
Re: Locking down exchange
Shultz! - Original Message - From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:47 AM Subject: RE: Locking down exchange Zerr vill be no deffeations from ze corporate polizee!!! -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Locking down exchange You might be able to accomplish some of them if you deployed Office via a Group Policy and custom Transform file. I don't know if you are going to be able to enforce them though. Group Policy does not cover Office, only Windows. Better solution would be to get with HR and draft a policy stating that company policy now dictates that no one use pretty graphics or HTML in e-mail. Fire the first couple of offenders and it will become clear very quickly that such behavior will not be tolerated. Oh, that and make sure no one is using friggin' Hotbar. Friggin' spyware, it is. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 25, 2003 12:33 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Locking down exchange Subject: RE: Locking down exchange Any chance you can point me to the policy? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Locking down exchange You need to lock those settings down thru a policy. Although I am not sure all can be locked. You will have to find each one and see if or what settings can be done. From: Jeremy T. Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Locking down exchange Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:57:41 -0400 This may sound extremely corny to some, but we have been handed down a directive from our COO to remove the ability for users to add fancy backgrounds and images in Outlook. He has also asked us to force the user to use a specific font and font size. He would like all messages to look the same, no matter what. We are running Exchange2k Enterprise and the clients are all using Outlook 2k. Thanks in advance for any assistance or ideas! Jeremy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Help protect your PC: Get a free online virus scan at McAfee.com. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
Thoughts from his manager? lol As in all of these things, it depends on the company. Simple is relative term and troubleshooting VPN issues with remote users can be a headache in itself. I could easily argue that using the NFUSE web interface to access Citrix is a heck of lot easier to walk Joe Salesguy through at his hotel rather than trying to figure out why he cant connect to the VPN. One another note, since hopefully most corporate laptops are using W2k or XP, there are no requirements to buy TS CALS to access a Terminal Server. At least for now. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:53 AM Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue I would disagree. Lets say Joe Salesguy is on a flight. He is working on a big sales proposal that needs to go out ASAP. He is meeting with the company the next day. Using OL with offline folders he is able to go over past conversations regarding the clients needs and thoughts from his manager. Then he is able to write the proposal, and have everything ready. He lands, gets to his hotel, connects to the net, initiates the VPN and the mail is on its way. His work is done and everyone is happy. You could do this with TS, it would just mean a little more work. I guess what my thinking is, is why invest all this extra money in TS Cals or Citrix CAL's and ask everyone to completely change the way they work when all you really need is a VPN. It would probably cost less and be much more user friendly. No changes to their work flow, just a simple icon they click on after they connect. Your solution is totally viable. I just don't see the point in asking everyone to change their workflow for what is really a quite simple problem and solution. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 5:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue If you dont have an Internet or RAS connection your not getting anywhere regardless of your e-mail client. You have to copy files to your local drive to work on them in any case and thats not really an issue with Terminal anymore and its very simple with Citrix. Jeff -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue That's what I kept thinking -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 7:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Makes laptop use a little tough though. From: Hague, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:23:15 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Definitely more costly but it really works well. The setup and configuration aspects alone (client-side anyway) are much simpler and the performance is probably much better than a straight VPN solution. I think if you look it at all the factors there is a positive ROI. Jeff -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 9:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue That's certainly an option, but a much more costly one IMHO. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Have you considered Terminal Server or (better yet) Citrix? This works wonders for us - full Outlook Exchange as well as all the other apps we run. We only have a dozen or so users so far but my understanding is that Terminal by itself on one decent server (dual Xeon 2.0GHz/1.5GB RAM) is fine for 20 or so clients simultaneously. Beyond that, Citrix on top of Terminal is the way to go. Citrix also provides better support for local printers, sound cards, etc plus a host of additional functionality. Either 1 requires only a single port through the firewall which hasnt been blocked by any ISPs (yet?) and the traffic is already encrypted although I dont imagine its as tight as most VPN solutions. The other thing we found so convenient is the Advanced Terminal client which is simply a web page that loads the client software through an ActiveX control in an IE session. The directions to get our clients set up was litterally go to .whatever.com and follow the instructions. There is some work to do getting the apps set up properly but common apps like Outlook, Word and Excel are very well documented. Getting our custom apps running wasnt near as difficult as I had expected either. The big trick for us is handling profiles because some of our clients
Re: Owa Not displaying mails with . in the end
Sounds like you have applied the IIS Lockdown Wizard . . http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;309677 - Original Message - From: Mats Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:44 AM Subject: Owa Not displaying mails with . in the end We have several customers running Exchange server 2000 (SP4) and using the OWA. I got some reports that some e-mails was not displayed in the OWA but looked fine in Outlook. I proceeded to investigate and I found that emails that have a subject line ending with . or .. are not displayed in the OWA HTTP 404 - File not found Anybody seen this issue or have a fix for it ? Regards Mats Eriksson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue
Not too bad. Im almost up to level 4 in Battle Tanks. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:29 AM Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue How do they work on airplanes? From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:10:02 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Of course, this being an Exchange list, Im pretty sure you meant it was tough using Outlook locally on a laptop with Citrix. Sure enough it is. Well, in fact, its damn near impossible. We have both VPN and Citrix here and since we implemented Citrix, none of the laptop users use the VPN anymore or sync their files offline. For the end-user, Citrix is a no-brainer it seems. - Original Message - From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 7:48 AM Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue From within Citrix, its simply a matter of copying over the file you need to work on to your local drive on the laptop. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:11 PM Subject: Re: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Makes laptop use a little tough though. From: Hague, Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 11:23:15 -0400 To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Definitely more costly but it really works well. The setup and configuration aspects alone (client-side anyway) are much simpler and the performance is probably much better than a straight VPN solution. I think if you look it at all the factors there is a positive ROI. Jeff -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 9:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue That's certainly an option, but a much more costly one IMHO. -Original Message- From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 5:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Port 135 and Exchange Issue Have you considered Terminal Server or (better yet) Citrix? This works wonders for us - full Outlook Exchange as well as all the other apps we run. We only have a dozen or so users so far but my understanding is that Terminal by itself on one decent server (dual Xeon 2.0GHz/1.5GB RAM) is fine for 20 or so clients simultaneously. Beyond that, Citrix on top of Terminal is the way to go. Citrix also provides better support for local printers, sound cards, etc plus a host of additional functionality. Either 1 requires only a single port through the firewall which hasnt been blocked by any ISPs (yet?) and the traffic is already encrypted although I dont imagine its as tight as most VPN solutions. The other thing we found so convenient is the Advanced Terminal client which is simply a web page that loads the client software through an ActiveX control in an IE session. The directions to get our clients set up was litterally go to .whatever.com and follow the instructions. There is some work to do getting the apps set up properly but common apps like Outlook, Word and Excel are very well documented. Getting our custom apps running wasnt near as difficult as I had expected either. The big trick for us is handling profiles because some of our clients can not have access to certain apps that other clients need so we had to modify some profiles manually but with so few clients it hasnt been a big deal. Jeff Hague MCSE Network Manager Randolph-Macon College Ashland, VA -Original Message- From: Hank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 3:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Port 135 and Exchange Issue We are trying to recover from ISPs closing down port 135. We have an dedicated Exchange Server at a hosting company. 20 of our 23 people scattered around the country can not use the full functionality of Outlook/Exchange because of this problem. We are a classic case study of how a company has suceeded in business by using most of the functionality of Outlook/Exchange. We built our 3 year old company's communications, task management, and database using the Exchange Platform, including extensive use of custom 'forms' that track hundreds of tasks and our workflow. The ISP's closing out port 135 has brought us to our knees. We are scambling just trying to stay on schedule with our committments to our clients. I have no hope that the ISPs
Re: Port 25 failing on IMC due to SOBIG.
Reason 25 why a SMTP gateway rocks. - Original Message - From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 1:55 PM Subject: Port 25 failing on IMC due to SOBIG. Exchange 5.5. We've been getting hammered by the SOBIG virus here. In the last hour both the systems that house our IMC failed on port 25 and I had to reboot. I pretty sure it's due to the flood of messages we are encountering. SOBIG count was 35,000 day before yesterday 45,000 yesterday. Any suggestions? I've talked to our firewall guy and he can't filter the notification out, so I'm looking for other options. What about increasing the number of connects on the IMC? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DEU Resume
Damn Recruiters! - Original Message - From: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 9:20 PM Subject: RE: DEU Resume Yes, I think you have figured it out. Every time I make a post to this list I get another email from the Army. Tom -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 6:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I think that maybe [EMAIL PROTECTED] is subscribed to this list, and has an autoreply rule. It's probably not sobig related at all. -Peter -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 15:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I just gone one too. And the headers look legit: Received: from ops.xetron.com ([192.168.1.121]) by s3cin.xetron.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59) id RHLTYYTF; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:08:21 -0400 Received: from fw.xetron.com ([192.168.1.1]) by ops.xetron.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.0.29) with SMTP id M2003081918073707859 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:07:37 -0400 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fw.xetron.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h7JM7aju024258 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:07:36 -0400 Received: from cpocwcp.hua.army.mil(138.27.195.254) by fw.xetron.com via smap (V2.1) id xma024249; Tue, 19 Aug 03 18:07:26 -0400 Received: by cpocwcp.hua.army.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id Q8GWXC9H; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:56 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: CPOCWCP DEU [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Alverson, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DEU Resume Received Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:03:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain X-Envfrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Bayes: 0.00 0.370709 -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DEU Resume I got the same thing!! Thought it might be the new email virus, but it had no attachment. Just got another as I write this!!! -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DEU Resume Anyone here receiving auto responses from the U.S. Army for a resume you never sent to them? About the time a message I sent to the list was posted, I got a reply from the Army. Sorry.. Been there.. Done that... got the tee shirt and the DD-214. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This message is private or privileged. If you are not the person for whom this message is intended, please delete it and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send this message to anyone else. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 3 Layers of Virus protection.
42. - Original Message - From: Hurst, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:40 AM Subject: RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection. We use 3. Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 3 Layers of Virus protection. I was curious how many have 3 layers of protection for their email systems. My current assignment has me at a place where they are comfortable with desktop and a set of SMTP servers doing virus and spam. Desktop is Symantec and Trend on the SMTP servers. My gut feeling is to also protect the IS stores too. How many have 3 levels. _ bGet MSN 8/b and help protect your children with advanced parental controls. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/parental _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (gfd) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 5.5 server sending and receiving previously processed me ssages
How old was the restored backup? - Original Message - From: Sean Brandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:18 PM Subject: Exchange 5.5 server sending and receiving previously processed me ssages Hi All, A few days ago some of our users reported receiving emails that they had previously received up to a month ago. Also messages that had been sent before were getting sent again. We had a disk failure on the exchange server over the weekend and just rebuilt it. People started reporting these symptoms on Monday. Anybody have any ideas on why our server is sending and receiving previously processed messages? Thanks, Sean ~~ Sean Brandt, MCSE Systems Engineer Lonely Planet Publications, USA tel: 510.893.8556 x217 mobile: 510.541.2601 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This email, including attachments, is intended only for the addressee and may be confidential, privileged and subject to copyright. If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender and delete it. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not use, copy or disclose its content to anyone. You must not copy or communicate to others content that is confidential or subject to copyright, unless you have the consent of the content owner. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OK, abuse well deserved....
And you took it well. That alone earns you a beer at the next MecEd. Roger's treat. - Original Message - From: Locey, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:40 PM Subject: OK, abuse well deserved My bad, I'll be more careful next time abuse absolutely deserved! -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: special question for you Andi's one of those sensitive, new age kinda guys... -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: special question for you Ehh? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: special question for you RFRC - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:05 PM Subject: RE: special question for you You're just jealous. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:01 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: special question for you Subject: Re: special question for you a very special question for you and 4000 of your friends... - Original Message - From: Locey, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:03 PM Subject: special question for you Chris, I noticed your name on several postings, and you see to be a very knowledgeable expert on Exchange/Outlook, so I thought I would write to you personally and ask a question.. We are migrating from 5.5 to 2K. To do this, we are implementing a new box with more horsepower, and a more logical naming convention. We have 300 or so Outlook clients on the floor, all who need to be re-configured to the new server by name, and have the mailbox checked/resolved. Is there a CLI to do this that we can put in the login script, or a GP that I can push? The name of the mailbox didn't change, just the server to which it is pointed, therefore, if I can just change the name and resolve, we will be fine. Thanks in advance if you can help. Dan Locey Infrastructure Manager Seisint, Inc. 6601 Park of Commerce Blvd. Boca Raton, FL 33487 561.999.4582 desk 561.866.6940 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
Re: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield
scans = trashes - Original Message - From: Jeremy I. Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:27 PM Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield I don't think it would, since Groupshield scans the store, not SMTP traffic. -Original Message- From: Tigue Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 5.5 and Groupshield I know this is not a 100% exchange question. We are running 5.5 and Groupshield. If someone sends an email to an alias on the system, would Groupshield stop it? We have a user that claims that he is getting email at his real address that is infected with viruses. This email gets bounced off the exchange server through an alias. Any help would be appreciated. Tigue __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and also may be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, or have otherwise received this communication in error, please delete it from your inbox, notify the sender immediately, and do not disclose its contents to any other person, use them for any purpose, or store or copy them in any medium. Thank you for your cooperation. Premier Dental Products Company Incorporated _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PST version - revisited
Did you bang your head against your desk? - Original Message - From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:31 PM Subject: RE: PST version - revisited Yep. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:28 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: PST version - revisited Subject: RE: PST version - revisited Did you remove the R? -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST version - revisited Hm... before copying would be rather difficult, as this is from a CD. Tried removing the A after copying, didn't seem to help. -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:11 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: PST version - revisited Subject: RE: PST version - revisited I know this sounds crazy, but clear the archive bit before you do the copy. There was some version of the pst that could not be opened unless you did that prior to copying it. That was documented, but it was awhile ago. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PST version - revisited pst19upg fails instantly. *sigh*. Thanks tho... -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 12:56 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: PST version - revisited Subject: RE: PST version - revisited Might also try running the pst19upg tool. If it was an old file, this upgrades it to a newer format. Might help, might not. A Google search ought to give you some places to download it. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 11:50 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: PST version - revisited Subject: RE: PST version - revisited The first time I ran it- that there were errors. Ran it again on same pst - says there are 4 folders (not even close...). Then I am able to open it, and there is one folder, Deleted Items. *sigh* I'm guessing what's in the log means from a scanpst perspective, I'm screwed. Scanpst log file: **Beginning NDB recovery **Attempting to open database **Attempting to validate header !!Header NDB magic incorrect (read=, expected=4E444221) **Attempting to validate AMap !!PMap page @17920: PTYPE mismatch (read 00, expected 83) !!PMap page @17920: BID mismatch (read 0, expected 4600) [...] **Attempting to rebuild BBT **Attempting to scavenge for blocks **Attempting to rebuild NBT **Attempting to scavenge for nodes **Attempting to validate BBT refcounts **Attempting to validate header NID high-water marks **Beginning PST/OST recovery **Attempting to recover all top-level objects !!Message store missing PR_PST_PASSWORD !!Message store missing or invalid PR_RECORD_KEY !!Message store missing PR_DISPLAY_NAME !!Message store missing PR_IPM_SUBTREE_ENTRYID !!Receive folder table missing !!Receive folder table missing default message class !!Name-to-id map missing !!Search folder (nid=1E1) missing update queue !!Search activity list missing !!Missing template (nid=60D) !!Missing template (nid=60E) !!Missing template (nid=60F) !!Missing template (nid=610) !!Missing template (nid=692) !!Missing template (nid=671) !!Missing the outgoing queue !!Missing root folder !!Missing IPM_SUBTREE **Attempting to walk all folders **Attempting to locate any orphaned folders/messages !!Adding folder (nid=8022) back to the database **Attempting to check top-level objects for consistency ??Deleting SDO **Updating folder hierarchy **Attempting to fix original file **Attempting to copy back BBT **Attempting to copy back NBT Microsoft (R) Inbox Repair Tool Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1995-1996. All rights reserved. **Beginning NDB recovery **Attempting to open database **Attempting to validate header **Attempting to validate AMap **Attempting to validate BBT **Attempting to validate NBT **Attempting to validate BBT refcounts **Attempting to validate header NID high-water marks **Beginning PST/OST recovery **Attempting to recover all top-level objects **Attempting to walk all folders **Attempting to locate any orphaned folders/messages **Attempting to check top-level objects for consistency **Updating folder hierarchy Microsoft (R) Inbox Repair Tool Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1995-1996. All rights reserved. **Beginning NDB recovery
Re: special question for you
RFRC - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:05 PM Subject: RE: special question for you You're just jealous. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:01 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: special question for you Subject: Re: special question for you a very special question for you and 4000 of your friends... - Original Message - From: Locey, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:03 PM Subject: special question for you Chris, I noticed your name on several postings, and you see to be a very knowledgeable expert on Exchange/Outlook, so I thought I would write to you personally and ask a question.. We are migrating from 5.5 to 2K. To do this, we are implementing a new box with more horsepower, and a more logical naming convention. We have 300 or so Outlook clients on the floor, all who need to be re-configured to the new server by name, and have the mailbox checked/resolved. Is there a CLI to do this that we can put in the login script, or a GP that I can push? The name of the mailbox didn't change, just the server to which it is pointed, therefore, if I can just change the name and resolve, we will be fine. Thanks in advance if you can help. Dan Locey Infrastructure Manager Seisint, Inc. 6601 Park of Commerce Blvd. Boca Raton, FL 33487 561.999.4582 desk 561.866.6940 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: special question for you
a very special question for you and 4000 of your friends... - Original Message - From: Locey, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:03 PM Subject: special question for you Chris, I noticed your name on several postings, and you see to be a very knowledgeable expert on Exchange/Outlook, so I thought I would write to you personally and ask a question.. We are migrating from 5.5 to 2K. To do this, we are implementing a new box with more horsepower, and a more logical naming convention. We have 300 or so Outlook clients on the floor, all who need to be re-configured to the new server by name, and have the mailbox checked/resolved. Is there a CLI to do this that we can put in the login script, or a GP that I can push? The name of the mailbox didn't change, just the server to which it is pointed, therefore, if I can just change the name and resolve, we will be fine. Thanks in advance if you can help. Dan Locey Infrastructure Manager Seisint, Inc. 6601 Park of Commerce Blvd. Boca Raton, FL 33487 561.999.4582 desk 561.866.6940 cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Blackberry (RIM)
Sticking with them for now. May rethink that when we go to Exchange 2003. - Original Message - From: Steck, Herb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 4:16 PM Subject: Exchange Blackberry (RIM) Is anyone out there supporting or using RIM's Blackberry service? Or does anyone know of alternitive's to the same type of technology? With their current legal issues I think now would be a good time to jump ship to something that is a good replacement before we lose the service. Thanks! The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cannot view Mailbox Rights...
Looking up c1041722 in Technet yields a number of hits. - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 2:24 PM Subject: Cannot view Mailbox Rights... Hello All. Still having a problem viewing Mailbox Rights for users. When I click on the Mailbox Rights... button under the Exchange Advanced tab, I get the following error: The Microsoft Exchange Information Store service could not find the specified object ID no: c1041722 Microsoft Active Directory - Exchange Extension Any ideas? Please help. Thanks Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
