Re: [expert] Re: MandrakeCommunityWiki and foreign languages
Am Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2003 23:43 schrieb James Sparenberg: On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 03:03, Steffen Barszus wrote: I think it would be better to have a new wiki. I don't think that the german wiki should be an exact copy of the english one, They are seperate. Kinda like how one apache server can have multiple virtual websites. Thats not the main point. Just wanted to say that wikis in other languages will not be a copy of the english one. And the prefix solution is not that optimal since a f.i. german speaker will only see sporadic german sites. This would make finding solutions very difficult. its more to have the german wiki on the same place like the Community wiki. Translating intertesting topics into german or vice versa can be made but syncing is not good I think. It is more to compile knowledge out of the mailiglist and make contribution for not english speaking people possible. To make it short: I would prefer the German/WebHome-way. Would be great if you would setup this Vincent. I hope I was understood when I mentioned cross posting. Not 2 sites in Sync but rather where it's applicable, a link that references the other. My thought being that if someone could only write his contribution in English or German, a link + babelfish would still make it usable for the other. (I couldn't count the number of times I've used French, Japanese or German sites just this way.) Heck sometimes I don't even bother with babelfish since code is code. If I would have a wish for free I would like a lot the translation feature of the club. It is very handy and allows easy translation of posts. The only multilanguage support I found on the twiki-web is the translate-keywords plugin. In wikipedia phase III you put a special keyword at the bottom of the page and have then a link at the upper left corner like [francais|espanol|deutsch] depending on the languages that wiki-page is translated (Have a look here: http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=Mandrake). But the last option is not optimal. If a translation is done and a change in the mainpage is done the translator should be notified, maybe the other way round would be usefull too. Furter it is more handy like in the club, if the content that will be translated will be filled in in the page to translate. This way all markup can be taken from the original and just the text be translated. A babelfish button for untranslated pages would indeed be nice too. Regards Steffen Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] Request on pricing for CS2.1 without Support
Hi Mandrake Soft, as Proposed - could I request such a support-less version of CS2.1 ? How much would it cost ? Thx for our Input. Cheers Joerg On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Vincent Danen wrote: Start making requests for a support-less version of CS2.1 for $200 or $250 and maybe you'll get it. You're paying that much for support included with the product. -- | Joerg Mertin : [EMAIL PROTECTED](Home)| | in Neuchâtel/Schweiz : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Work)| | Stardust's LiNUX System : | | PGP 2.6.3in Key on Demand : Voice Fax: +41(0)32 / 725 52 54 | Home-Page: http://www.solsys.org Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] Updated 18mdk update kernel...
Since the official MDK 9.1 update kernel still lacks some features, I decided to add some of them myself with the following changes: - Keep version/release to not breake 3:rd party modules / addons... - My latest vesafb patch that you can find in 2.4.21-rc7-ac1 - nForce2 UDMA/133 reporting (but I dont program above UDMA100 for now) - Updated pci.ids to help in bugtracking... - Updates to Firewire (ieee1394) revision 925, including nForce2 support - Updated Adaptec scsi aic7xxx, added 79xx (U320 cards) support - ACL support for XFS filesystem And since I haven't enough homepage space, I just provide the standard kernel precompiled. If you need any other, grab the src.rpm and rebuild the ones you need... And all this is found at: http://www.iki.fi/tmb/9.1/18mdk/ -- Thomas Backlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.iki.fi/tmb Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Signatures on packages....
Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I'm still getting the error after following your instructions... The gnu pg seemed to install fine. I'm also running mdk 9.1 BTW. Any other ideas?? -Original Message- From: James Sparenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:38 PM To: Expert List Subject: Re: [expert] Signatures on packages On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 05:52, Tango Echo wrote: Guys, Please don't flame me for cross-posting. I'm only doing so becuase I did not receive a solution from the Newbie List (maybe got overlooked). Below is my problem... Thanks in advance... Hi all, I have recently decided to install the package chkrootkit after hearing it can be a useful tool with security. However when I do so I receive an error: The following packaages have bad signatures: full path ../chkrootkit-0.39-1mdk.i586.rpm I have been told I need the keys for the contrib packages. I'm not sure this is accurate. But I am sure that I do not want any errors like this when installing chkrootkit (plz dont' tell me to just ignore it) Thanks in advance the package gnupg-1.2.2-1.1mdk for 9.1 supplies the contrib and main signatures for MDK. Do a rpm -Uvh --force gnupg-1.2.2-1.1mdk.i586.rpm to get it back.. IF you are on 9.1 ... if you are on say 9.0 then that is the reason it's complaining about the signature. It's different between any two distro's. Grab the one for the distro you are on. James he distro you are on. James __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Signatures on packages....
login as root instead of using sudo or MandrakeUpdate as a user -- the keys are in root's keyring. Or find them on the web and add them to your own ring. On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 04:59, Tango Echo wrote: Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I'm still getting the error after following your instructions... The gnu pg seemed to install fine. I'm also running mdk 9.1 BTW. Any other ideas?? -Original Message- From: James Sparenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:38 PM To: Expert List Subject: Re: [expert] Signatures on packages On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 05:52, Tango Echo wrote: Guys, Please don't flame me for cross-posting. I'm only doing so becuase I did not receive a solution from the Newbie List (maybe got overlooked). Below is my problem... Thanks in advance... Hi all, I have recently decided to install the package chkrootkit after hearing it can be a useful tool with security. However when I do so I receive an error: The following packaages have bad signatures: full path ../chkrootkit-0.39-1mdk.i586.rpm I have been told I need the keys for the contrib packages. I'm not sure this is accurate. But I am sure that I do not want any errors like this when installing chkrootkit (plz dont' tell me to just ignore it) Thanks in advance the package gnupg-1.2.2-1.1mdk for 9.1 supplies the contrib and main signatures for MDK. Do a rpm -Uvh --force gnupg-1.2.2-1.1mdk.i586.rpm to get it back.. IF you are on 9.1 ... if you are on say 9.0 then that is the reason it's complaining about the signature. It's different between any two distro's. Grab the one for the distro you are on. James he distro you are on. James __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com __ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture... http://www.monkeynoodle.org/resume.html Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] lufsmount
Anyone familiar with lufs know where it's looking for these files so I can link or something. $ lufsmount sshfs://[EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt liblufs-sshfs.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory unsupported file system: sshfs $ locate liblufs-sshfs.so /home/brian/INCOMING/lufs-0.9.6/filesystems/sshfs/.libs/liblufs-sshfs.so.2.0.0 /home/brian/INCOMING/lufs-0.9.6/filesystems/sshfs/.libs/liblufs-sshfs.so.2 /home/brian/INCOMING/lufs-0.9.6/filesystems/sshfs/.libs/liblufs-sshfs.so /usr/local/lib/liblufs-sshfs.so.2.0.0 /usr/local/lib/liblufs-sshfs.so.2 /usr/local/lib/liblufs-sshfs.so Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Signatures on packages....
[..] On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 04:59, Tango Echo wrote: Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I'm still getting the error after following your instructions... The gnu pg seemed to install fine. I'm also running mdk 9.1 BTW. Any other ideas?? [..] I believe you will find that certain contrib packages are not signed and you will have to install without a signature, if you want the package. When rpm reports a missing key, such as when you verify a package with rpm -K (package).rpm, you should be able to search around to find it. Various contributors have their own gpg keys. There are public keyservers that *might* contain the needed key or you could rpm -qp --changelog (package).rpm to see who contributed the package and search on the cooker archives for clues to the sources of that key. For instance, Oden Eriksson packages chkrootkit. You can find links to his key and that of Han Boetes, who packages abcde, in the following post to cooker: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg106798.html You can wget the file and gpg --import (file) as root. I don't have problems doing this from a su root commandline but YMMV. See man gpg. Rolf Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] tip command
Dear all ! I'm trying to connect to remote system using a modem ... but the software that I'm trying to use, uses the tip command . Tip comes with Solaris workstations, and some linux distributions ... but, Does exist a linux-mandrake rpm ? ... Does exist a source code available on internet ? Thanks in advance! Rodrigo DGF, UCH Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] Wanted to try wine
I've never run a windows emulator before and I wanted to see if I could get some Blizzard (StarCraft, WarCraft etc...) games to run under Mandrake 9.1 What I discovered is that 9.1 comes with only 1 emulator (that I've found so far) and it is a freakin Alpha. We were not amused. So. What is the best way to do this? -- Jim C. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine
I've tried dozen of times to install wine successfully on mandrake to run half-life and its mods. The last try, i could install half-life. but i could not run it. So, I'd give up. - Original Message - From: Jim C [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:22 PM Subject: [expert] Wanted to try wine I've never run a windows emulator before and I wanted to see if I could get some Blizzard (StarCraft, WarCraft etc...) games to run under Mandrake 9.1 What I discovered is that 9.1 comes with only 1 emulator (that I've found so far) and it is a freakin Alpha. We were not amused. So. What is the best way to do this? -- Jim C. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Remove the supplied wine and either spend a little and get the very good (for gaming) WineX rpm from Transgaming (or you can freely download the source and build it yourself, but it is a royal PITA). You could try Codeweaver's Wine (for a small fee, me thinks) which is a nice, but slowly updated version. Or you could simply try the latest build of Wine from WineHQ for free. StarCraft has long worked well with wine of various stripes. I personally use WineX and am a paying member of the Transgaming community and I know first-hand that StarCraft works with it. As for other games, your success with games is probably higher with WineX than any other version since that is what Transgaming is entirely focused on in the wine builds. In any case, it will still be hit-and-miss. You could go to the Transgaming site and search for the game you are interested in and see how it is rated in useability/playability or you can simply peruse the entire list. You can have two different wines installed as well - WineX uses a binary called winex while WineHQ and codeweavers use wine...and I believe they will install into different locations so as not to conflict but I am not certain on this. praedor On Thursday 12 June 2003 11:22 am, Jim C wrote: I've never run a windows emulator before and I wanted to see if I could get some Blizzard (StarCraft, WarCraft etc...) games to run under Mandrake 9.1 What I discovered is that 9.1 comes with only 1 emulator (that I've found so far) and it is a freakin Alpha. We were not amused. So. What is the best way to do this? - -- Patriotism as practiced in the USA is blindly accepting, noncritical, and silently following along. It is very fascist in form, not democratic at all. - --Ani DeFranco -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+6KsRaKr9sJYeTxgRAqNmAKCB6SdgcZ4gysCN05I05V+ACgPvZQCeL/JC Y6t3fVBrgc2WI5Ol4ujMhnY= =kXSJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine
Jim C wrote: I've never run a windows emulator before and I wanted to see if I could get some Blizzard (StarCraft, WarCraft etc...) games to run under Mandrake 9.1 What I discovered is that 9.1 comes with only 1 emulator (that I've found so far) and it is a freakin Alpha. We were not amused. So. What is the best way to do this? Even though wine is considered alpha, it is quite functional. I use it to run the Lotus Notes client, and it works great. For games, though, you will want to get Transgaming's version of wine, called WineX (because it added DirectX and other functional support for games). You can get the source to WineX for free, or pay a minimal subscription fee (as little as $15 for three months, last time I checked) and download an rpm file. It comes with a decent GUI config utility, which also allows you to easily install and uninstall your Windows programs. -- Dave Sherman MCSE, MCSA, CCNA Windows NT was supposed to hit Unix hard (it did - like a bug hitting a windshield) - Andrew Grygus, aaxnet.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine
Wine never worked for me, but crossover (a commercial thing based on wine) did. I'm running photoshop, macromedia flash, and several other windows-applications which I need for work on my linux box. Yes, I paid for it, but it was (and is) worth every cent. Since wine is published under GPL, crossover has to free the source code, so I expect wine to make fast progress in the future. Maybe you can check out their website, and follow it up ? Steven On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 18:22, Jim C wrote: I've never run a windows emulator before and I wanted to see if I could get some Blizzard (StarCraft, WarCraft etc...) games to run under Mandrake 9.1 What I discovered is that 9.1 comes with only 1 emulator (that I've found so far) and it is a freakin Alpha. We were not amused. So. What is the best way to do this? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
RE: [expert] Wanted to try wine
If you want non-alpha software for running Windows applications and you are willing to pay for it, hop on over to one of the following sites: http://www.vmware.com http://www.winforlin.com/ If you're looking for a more polished version of wine for gaming and are willing to pay for it, hop on over to the following site: http://www.transgaming.com If what you want is a more polished version of wine for MS Office compatibility and are willing to pay for it, hop on over to the following site: http://www.codeweavers.com Lastly, if you want to try your hand at the latest version of (yes, alpha) wine for free, hop on over to the following site: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=6241 Wine is Alpha software so your success rate for running Windows applications will be hit or miss. By your post, it looks like you're interested in gaming. That being the case, I would recommend the Transgaming option. It's good software by a decent company at a reasonable price. It will probably be your only option for getting WarCraft to work. StarCraft on the other hand will work with the free version of wine - and has for a long time. One caveat is battle.net which still has some font rendering problems at last check. HTH David -Original Message- From: Jim C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [expert] Wanted to try wine I've never run a windows emulator before and I wanted to see if I could get some Blizzard (StarCraft, WarCraft etc...) games to run under Mandrake 9.1 What I discovered is that 9.1 comes with only 1 emulator (that I've found so far) and it is a freakin Alpha. We were not amused. So. What is the best way to do this? -- Jim C. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine
And how is the performance of those applications runing under crossover? almost as windows or too low? Do you think directx based games can run great with this program? - Original Message - From: Steven Broos [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine Wine never worked for me, but crossover (a commercial thing based on wine) did. I'm running photoshop, macromedia flash, and several other windows-applications which I need for work on my linux box. Yes, I paid for it, but it was (and is) worth every cent. Since wine is published under GPL, crossover has to free the source code, so I expect wine to make fast progress in the future. Maybe you can check out their website, and follow it up ? Steven On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 18:22, Jim C wrote: I've never run a windows emulator before and I wanted to see if I could get some Blizzard (StarCraft, WarCraft etc...) games to run under Mandrake 9.1 What I discovered is that 9.1 comes with only 1 emulator (that I've found so far) and it is a freakin Alpha. We were not amused. So. What is the best way to do this? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] Re: Request on pricing for CS2.1 without Support
On Thu Jun 12, 2003 at 11:48:11AM +0200, Joerg Mertin wrote:
Hi Mandrake Soft,
as Proposed - could I request such a support-less version of CS2.1 ?
How much would it cost ?
Thx for our Input.
You should send this email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]; I actually have no
control over the marketting/sales of any product.
--
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
Online Security Resource Book; http://linsec.ca/
lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import
{FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine
Those apps run smoother with crossover than they do in windows :-) For games (forgot to mention that) you're better of using wineX I suppose, but I'm not familiar with it. I'm not much of a gamer. Crossover Office is developed especially for the use of desktop applications, and I don't think it supports directX. Steven On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 18:52, João Candido Araujo Milasch Filho wrote: And how is the performance of those applications runing under crossover? almost as windows or too low? Do you think directx based games can run great with this program? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] insmod
Isn't there a switch for insmod to list active mods? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine
Hi, actually, I've managed to get starcraft running using the pre-built free rpm (normal + glibc2) on http://wine.dataparty.no/ It's always the latest CVS of the free version of wine (the one that is included with MDK actually). What's even nicer, I don't even need an existing windows installation... I just followed the instructions (quite easy) to setup a fake windows root, and starcraft works fine (although battle.net has problems, and broodwar does't work either). It's very stable, and I haven't run into a single problem wrt starcraft yet... Cheers, Hans On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 18:22, Jim C wrote: I've never run a windows emulator before and I wanted to see if I could get some Blizzard (StarCraft, WarCraft etc...) games to run under Mandrake 9.1 What I discovered is that 9.1 comes with only 1 emulator (that I've found so far) and it is a freakin Alpha. We were not amused. So. What is the best way to do this? -- In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? Is the essence that the light pulse lives longer? Hans Schippers 1LIC INF UIA 2002-2003 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [expert] New Con Kolivas 2.4.21-rc7 kernel patch
Ummm... Where can I get such patches? Sounds interesting... Best regards, Adrian - Original Message - From: Robert Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 6:49 PM Subject: [expert] New Con Kolivas 2.4.21-rc7 kernel patch For those interested, there's a brand new Con Kolivas -ck1 patch against kernel 2.4.21-rc7. I just tried it on Mandrake 9.1, and so far so good, except no supermount (if one cares). I just applied the 2.4.21-rc7 patch to 2.4.20 source (did mrproper first), then applied the ck1 patch, and then did make xconfig. I loaded the stock Mandrake 9.1 2.4.21-pre .config file, then I selected for my cpu (athlon), said no to some various hardware devices and options I never use or have. (wound up with a 1.1MB kernel image) Then did the usual: make dep make clean make bzImage make modules su to root, and: make modules_install make install Then I checked /boot and /etc/lilo.conf just to make sure all was correct. In my case, I removed the old 2.4.20-ck7 kernel and 2.4.20-ck7 /lib/modules, and lilo entries. Ran lilo again to finish up, and rebooted, Booted fine, and I'm now using the new patched preemptive kernel from Con Kolivas. Seems really responsive. Robert Crawford Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] insmod
On 12 Jun 2003 13:17:37 -0400 Brian V Bonini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't there a switch for insmod to list active mods? ls -- If you stand on your head, you will get footprints in your hair. - Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk - mod Charles pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[expert] Change default editor.
Hi, I would like to globally change the default editor in Mandrake 9.1 (vim I think) to another one. How can that be done? I have been looking around and been asking on IRC, but I am not able to make it work. To be clear: I *never* want vim to open any file. I want another editor to simply replace vim by default. Please do not try to convince me to use vi/vim. I do not want to take part in that discussion again... :) TIA for help and/or pointers. -- //Christian Registered Linux User #228949 at: http://counter.li.org/ -- What if it all means something? -- Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Signatures on packages....
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 06:19, Jack Coates wrote: login as root instead of using sudo or MandrakeUpdate as a user -- the keys are in root's keyring. Or find them on the web and add them to your own ring. The other possibility is that is has a bad sig. Let me test it out here and see what I get. Can't hurt. James Ok, I checked it and you are right. My mirror ftp.club-internet.fr has the same problem... Vincent, if you are reading this I guess this kind of thing is in your ballpark. I checked two additional mirrors (mandrake.secsup.org and slug.usc.edu and got the same results.) I don't have my disks handy to check them out and see if it is the same on the disk set, but it definitely is bad on the mirrors I've been to. Odds on it's a bad sig on the package, but to be on the safe side I'd say to grab the source and build out from there. To be consistent with MDK and to get a working version the way you want (avoiding any chance of a highjack.) do this one. Download the src rpm then do rpm -Uvh chkrootkit-xx.src.rpm. Also download the real src tarball Replace the one in /usr/src/RPM/SOURCES with the one you downloaded (make sure that it's bzip not gz or the other way around if needed, then cd ../SPECS. If you then do rpm -ba chkrootkit.spec (or whatever the spec name is.) you will rebuild an rpm for yourself that you know is from clean source and has all the proper MDK hooks. Frankly I'd just build from source as normal with the --prefix=/usr when running configure and go from there. James On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 04:59, Tango Echo wrote: Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I'm still getting the error after following your instructions... The gnu pg seemed to install fine. I'm also running mdk 9.1 BTW. Any other ideas?? -Original Message- From: James Sparenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:38 PM To: Expert List Subject: Re: [expert] Signatures on packages On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 05:52, Tango Echo wrote: Guys, Please don't flame me for cross-posting. I'm only doing so becuase I did not receive a solution from the Newbie List (maybe got overlooked). Below is my problem... Thanks in advance... Hi all, I have recently decided to install the package chkrootkit after hearing it can be a useful tool with security. However when I do so I receive an error: The following packaages have bad signatures: full path ../chkrootkit-0.39-1mdk.i586.rpm I have been told I need the keys for the contrib packages. I'm not sure this is accurate. But I am sure that I do not want any errors like this when installing chkrootkit (plz dont' tell me to just ignore it) Thanks in advance the package gnupg-1.2.2-1.1mdk for 9.1 supplies the contrib and main signatures for MDK. Do a rpm -Uvh --force gnupg-1.2.2-1.1mdk.i586.rpm to get it back.. IF you are on 9.1 ... if you are on say 9.0 then that is the reason it's complaining about the signature. It's different between any two distro's. Grab the one for the distro you are on. James he distro you are on. James __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com __ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] insmod
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 13:26, Charles A Edwards wrote: On 12 Jun 2003 13:17:37 -0400 Brian V Bonini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't there a switch for insmod to list active mods? ls ah yes, lsmod... Thanks!! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [expert] Vmware kai IPAQ
12 2003 06:01, / James Sparenberg : Question here... is it a USB device? Really dirty way might be to do /etc/init.d/usb stop before loading then /etc/init.d/usb start after it's discovered. Don't have one to test this theory on ... just an idea. yes it is a usb device. I don't want to disable USB, I want to leave the device alone (it cannot be used anyway) to use it with vmware machine. manolis Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] lufsmount
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 07:21, Brian V Bonini wrote: Anyone familiar with lufs know where it's looking for these files so I can link or something. $ lufsmount sshfs://[EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt liblufs-sshfs.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory unsupported file system: sshfs don't use lufs I use a variant of it called shfs. I've got two notes. One with shfs it would be lufsmount shfs (note the single s) etc etc. second... did you verify that the kernel module is loaded? James $ locate liblufs-sshfs.so /home/brian/INCOMING/lufs-0.9.6/filesystems/sshfs/.libs/liblufs-sshfs.so.2.0.0 /home/brian/INCOMING/lufs-0.9.6/filesystems/sshfs/.libs/liblufs-sshfs.so.2 /home/brian/INCOMING/lufs-0.9.6/filesystems/sshfs/.libs/liblufs-sshfs.so /usr/local/lib/liblufs-sshfs.so.2.0.0 /usr/local/lib/liblufs-sshfs.so.2 /usr/local/lib/liblufs-sshfs.so __ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Bad trouble here (db stuff)
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 13:56:28 -0400 darklord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had to force a hard reboot, whereupon a I got a message about some xfont being not there, and the xserver will not start now, so X won't work. Is the xfont error the only 1 you get or to also get an error for a missing .so file use rpm -q and verify that XFree-libs is still installed. If you Are getting the missing so error use rpm -q and verify that XFree86-libs is still installed. Install it if it is not and reboot. Charles -- Each kiss is as the first. -- Miramanee, Kirk's wife, The Paradise Syndrome, stardate 4842.6 - Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [expert] 2.4.21.0.18mdk-1-1 - IRQ Balancing still not fixed...
Does it depend on the processor? We have a double PII and a double Xeon (which shows as 4 processor). On the PII, it is balanced, on the Xeon, CPU0 does all the work. Just wondering, Guillaume. On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 12:20, Mark Watts wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * IRQ balancing has been fixed for SMP Incorrect. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# uname -a Linux mail1 2.4.21-0.18mdkenterprise #1 SMP Wed Jun 4 11:44:12 MDT 2003 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 0: 46423 0IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 2 0IO-APIC-edge keyboard 2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade 5: 0 0 IO-APIC-level usb-ohci 8: 1 0IO-APIC-edge rtc 14: 6 0IO-APIC-edge ide0 16: 16 0 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx 17: 16 0 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx 28: 5206 0 IO-APIC-level eth0 29: 4179 0 IO-APIC-level eth1 30: 11562 0 IO-APIC-level aacraid NMI: 0 0 LOC: 46328 46283 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 - -- Mark Watts Systems Engineer QinetiQ TIM St Andrews Road, Malvern GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+6KheBn4EFUVUIO0RAun7AJ9wqckUCJdzLFaHCMb/Y4GDvKWJYQCeOQLE Imrck9wxxvfrCQOygO62rCI= =bCFF -END PGP SIGNATURE- Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Signatures on packages....
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 07:43, Rolf Pedersen wrote: [..] On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 04:59, Tango Echo wrote: Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, I'm still getting the error after following your instructions... The gnu pg seemed to install fine. I'm also running mdk 9.1 BTW. Any other ideas?? [..] I believe you will find that certain contrib packages are not signed and you will have to install without a signature, if you want the package. When rpm reports a missing key, such as when you verify a package with rpm -K (package).rpm, you should be able to search around to find it. Various contributors have their own gpg keys. There are public keyservers that *might* contain the needed key or you could rpm -qp --changelog (package).rpm to see who contributed the package and search on the cooker archives for clues to the sources of that key. For instance, Oden Eriksson packages chkrootkit. You can find links to his key and that of Han Boetes, who packages abcde, in the following post to cooker: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg106798.html You can wget the file and gpg --import (file) as root. I don't have problems doing this from a su root commandline but YMMV. See man gpg. Rolf Rolf, You're right, but my understanding from Warly during the various beta and rc cycles was that anything in release contrib is resigned with MDK's sig before release. (at least there where a lot of people checking this point for him.) with cooker contrib yes... this is a problem. (and people are always noting bad sigs there.) However nothing new gets added to release contrib does it? It would seem that updates would go into update not straight into contrib. But maybe I'm mistaken. James __ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 09:30, João Candido Araujo Milasch Filho wrote: I've tried dozen of times to install wine successfully on mandrake to run half-life and its mods. The last try, i could install half-life. but i could not run it. So, I'd give up. - Original Message - From: Jim C [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:22 PM Subject: [expert] Wanted to try wine I've never run a windows emulator before and I wanted to see if I could get some Blizzard (StarCraft, WarCraft etc...) games to run under Mandrake 9.1 What I discovered is that 9.1 comes with only 1 emulator (that I've found so far) and it is a freakin Alpha. We were not amused. So. What is the best way to do this? -- Jim C. Lot of people who game have had nice luck with the transgaming version of wine. At least they tell you up front what will/won't work. As for Alpha... shoot wine has been in alpha for what, 10 years now *grin*. (dang hard to shoot a moving and invisible target.) James Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] insmod
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 10:17, Brian V Bonini wrote: Isn't there a switch for insmod to list active mods? lsmod instead of insmod __ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 12 June 2003 01:56 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 09:30, João Candido Araujo Milasch Filho wrote: I've tried dozen of times to install wine successfully on mandrake to run half-life and its mods. The last try, i could install half-life. but i could not run it. So, I'd give up. [...] Lot of people who game have had nice luck with the transgaming version of wine. At least they tell you up front what will/won't work. As for Alpha... shoot wine has been in alpha for what, 10 years now *grin*. (dang hard to shoot a moving and invisible target.) I have played Half-Life and Deus Ex twice each through wine. I got Half-Life working the first time with regular old wine. I've had better success with winex since. praedor - -- Patriotism as practiced in the USA is blindly accepting, noncritical, and silently following along. It is very fascist in form, not democratic at all. - --Ani DeFranco -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+6M4FaKr9sJYeTxgRAvD6AKC2M/AgVWGy22tnnG+jZXTTZK8AeQCfVsmi eLQz1pqVO6RjRR9LRU701EY= =0b9B -END PGP SIGNATURE- Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Signatures on packages....
On 12 Jun 2003 11:53:00 -0700 James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're right, but my understanding from Warly during the various beta and rc cycles was that anything in release contrib is resigned with MDK's sig before release. (at least there where a lot of people checking this point for him.) with cooker contrib yes... this is a problem. (and people are always noting bad sigs there.) However nothing new gets added to release contrib does it? It would seem that updates would go into update not straight into contrib. But maybe I'm mistaken. Many/most contrib rpms Do Not contain the builders signature Only the Mandrake sig. These will all install without error. It is Only the contrib rpms which Have been signed by the builder that give the sig error during installation. You have 2 choice you can import the sigs from a key.server for you root keyring or you can disregard the sig error. Disregarding the error will in no way compromise security as all contrib rpms are Still verified to contain the Mandrake sig. Charles -- interest, n.: What borrowers pay, lenders receive, stockholders own, and burned out employees must feign. - Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [expert] Vmware kai IPAQ
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 11:32, manolis wrote: 12 2003 06:01, / James Sparenberg : Question here... is it a USB device? Really dirty way might be to do /etc/init.d/usb stop before loading then /etc/init.d/usb start after it's discovered. Don't have one to test this theory on ... just an idea. yes it is a usb device. I don't want to disable USB, I want to leave the device alone (it cannot be used anyway) to use it with vmware machine. manolis Manolis, I'm not much into USB myself (don't have the cash for the toys I really want.*grin*) However man hotplug or info hotplug could well be your friend there is a file in /etc/hotplug called blacklist. My understanding is that you can tell hotplug not to react to specific devices here (in this case it would be the device Linux thinks you have I believe you said it was a scanner.) then vmware handles it from there. Since I don't have much in the way of USB here. http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net/ Is the website for hotplug more info might be there as well. But my best opinion on this would be that hotplug would be the key since it controls how usb devices are handled. James __ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] lilo ?? install 9.1
Hi all I've had a real bad experience using a hard drive that previously had winxp on it. I ran very low on HD space so I took the 60GB HD out of the winxp machine , installed as hdc and backed up what files I needed off that drive. next step was to delete the ntfs partitions and repartition with ext3, All apparently went well, and I transfered wanted files from hda to hdc. Checked everything was all right, and all the files moved across were in a partiton on hdc. the next step was to reinstall the system on to the 60GB drive(was hdc), and to use just 1 HD on this machine. So fresh install of 9.1 and this is were things went horribly wrong, on boot up no partitions had been written, tried to repair and failed, tried using the rescue facility ...that failed. So again another fresh install and this time made a boot floppy as well. again on reboot failure, so used the rescue facility to rerun the boot loader, Tried another bootup , same again reran the boot sector loader from rescue and this time the next reboot was successful.. After speaking to a few people I'm not the only person to have had problems with drives after winxp was installed on them. I suspect this may be a gates measure to deliberately make it awkward to change OS's once winxp has been installed, microsoft have done this before. Maybe ,and this is the point I'm trying to make, the developers need to look at the lilo or grub, to assume the MBR to contain hostile material and delete it before installing. If a newbie had decided to kick winxp off their machine and move to linux, I feel they would give up trying to install linux and go back to winblows. regards Richard -- richard bown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] Mdk 9.1 processors (was Pentium 4)
030611 Greg Meyer wrote: On Tuesday 10 June 2003 03:38 pm, Philip Webb wrote: so i will look seriously at the AMD processors, You should have no problem as long as your motherboard supports it. I'd get the Barton (newer core). The processors you mention should run pretty close to Intel 2.4-2.5 GHz. Yes they will work with mdk. If you went with a 2500+ on a KT400 based board, you will get good support in 9.1. If you were to go nforce2, you will have a few problems unless you install the binary drivers available directly from nVidia. yes, i've seen lots of messages re problems with Nvidia m/boards Linux. i will investigate, decide the best combination may report results later. thanx again to all respondents. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban Community Studies TRANSIT`-O--O---' University of Toronto Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Mdk 9.1 processors (was Pentium 4)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 12 June 2003 02:14 pm, Philip Webb wrote: 030611 Greg Meyer wrote: On Tuesday 10 June 2003 03:38 pm, Philip Webb wrote: so i will look seriously at the AMD processors, You should have no problem as long as your motherboard supports it. I'd get the Barton (newer core). The processors you mention should run pretty close to Intel 2.4-2.5 GHz. Yes they will work with mdk. If you went with a 2500+ on a KT400 based board, you will get good support in 9.1. If you were to go nforce2, you will have a few problems unless you install the binary drivers available directly from nVidia. yes, i've seen lots of messages re problems with Nvidia m/boards Linux. i will investigate, decide the best combination may report results later. thanx again to all respondents. I am seriously looking at an Epox 87RD+ nvidia nforce2 board. It has EXCELLENT specs and an truly excellent price...but now I am given pause. I have no problem downloading an NVIDIA driver (I use the binary NVIDIA driver for my GeForce4 Ti4200) to get my mobo working in linux. Is there anyone on the list using an nforce2 board? Is all OK with the Nvidia driver? praedor - -- Patriotism as practiced in the USA is blindly accepting, noncritical, and silently following along. It is very fascist in form, not democratic at all. - --Ani DeFranco -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+6NJaaKr9sJYeTxgRAropAJ9as67N/qC2l4V931CHrJHkN4I+WACfXmoG x088IR3Bo96s8DZKmeN2AuY= =a0T7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] Problem with eth0: eht0:9 ?????
A friend of mine is trying to have Internet runing Mandrake 9.1; it has a cable-modem very similar to the mine and the same internet provider. dhcp-client also installed, but until now it has been impossible to have the network runing :-(. I have tryed to help him but I have seen some rare messages using dmesg and ifconfig; unfortunately I can't understand if those messages are giving ideads about how to solve the problem; so I would like to look for help; perhaps someone in the expert list could understand the messages and help us to resolve the problem. It has a Pentium IV with an ethernet card (eth0); under windows the internet conection is runing fine :-( Those are the dmesg lines related with eth0: 8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.26 eth0: RealTek RTL8139 Fast Ethernet at 0xe0945000, 00:40:f4:77:bc:82, IRQ 19 eth0: Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139C' . .. . eth0: Setting half-duplex based on auto-negotiated partner ability . NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out eth0: Tx queue start entry 4 dirty entry 0. eth0: Tx descriptor 0 is 2000. (queue head) eth0: Tx descriptor 1 is 2000. eth0: Tx descriptor 2 is 2000. eth0: Tx descriptor 3 is 2000. eth0: Setting half-duplex based on auto-negotiated partner ability . zcip uses obsolete (PF_INET,SOCK_PACKET) eth0: Promiscuous mode enabled. device eth0 entered promiscuous mode device eth0 left promiscuous mode NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out eth0: Tx queue start entry 4 dirty entry 0. eth0: Tx descriptor 0 is 2000. (queue head) eth0: Tx descriptor 1 is 2000. eth0: Tx descriptor 2 is 2000. eth0: Tx descriptor 3 is 2000. eth0: Setting half-duplex based on auto-negotiated partner ability . .. . NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out eth0: Tx queue start entry 4 dirty entry 0. eth0: Tx descriptor 0 is 2000. (queue head) eth0: Tx descriptor 1 is 2000. eth0: Tx descriptor 2 is 2000. eth0: Tx descriptor 3 is 2000. eth0: Setting half-duplex based on auto-negotiated partner ability . ---O Ifconfig results: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:F4:77:BC:82 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:19 Base address:0x5000 eth0:9Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:F4:77:BC:82 inet addr:169.254.162.175 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Interrupt:19 Base address:0x5000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:206 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:206 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:12266 (11.9 Kb) TX bytes:12266 (11.9 Kb) What's the meaning of eth0:9 Any help will be welcome; thanks so much in advance; yours sincerely -- Francisco Alcaraz Ariza Murcia, España (Spain) Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Change default editor.
On Thu Jun 12, 2003 at 12:59:52PM -0500, Christian Dysthe wrote:
I would like to globally change the default editor in Mandrake 9.1 (vim I
think) to another one. How can that be done? I have been looking around and
been asking on IRC, but I am not able to make it work. To be clear: I
*never* want vim to open any file. I want another editor to simply replace
vim by default.
Please do not try to convince me to use vi/vim. I do not want to take part
in that discussion again... :)
TIA for help and/or pointers.
echo export EDITOR=joe ~/.bashrc
That should do it. Replace joe with your preferred editor.
--
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
Online Security Resource Book; http://linsec.ca/
lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import
{FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [expert] Change default editor.
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:59:52 -0500 Christian Dysthe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to globally change the default editor in Mandrake 9.1 Here's an example which fires up an emacs window if local, or runs emacs in the xterm if the session appears to be remote (I don't like running an X window over a modem). /etc/profile.d/editor.sh(perms=755): export EDITOR=emacs if [ $DISPLAY != :0.0 ];then export EDITOR=emacs -nw fi Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine
Crossover office is a little unstable on mandrake 9.1, and the performance of some fucntions is not as good as native windows (many actions perform quite well though). However, the performance beats the pants off of running the same applications in Win2K on VMware. On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 09:52, João Candido Araujo Milasch Filho wrote: And how is the performance of those applications runing under crossover? almost as windows or too low? Do you think directx based games can run great with this program? - Original Message - From: Steven Broos [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine Wine never worked for me, but crossover (a commercial thing based on wine) did. I'm running photoshop, macromedia flash, and several other windows-applications which I need for work on my linux box. Yes, I paid for it, but it was (and is) worth every cent. Since wine is published under GPL, crossover has to free the source code, so I expect wine to make fast progress in the future. Maybe you can check out their website, and follow it up ? Steven On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 18:22, Jim C wrote: I've never run a windows emulator before and I wanted to see if I could get some Blizzard (StarCraft, WarCraft etc...) games to run under Mandrake 9.1 What I discovered is that 9.1 comes with only 1 emulator (that I've found so far) and it is a freakin Alpha. We were not amused. So. What is the best way to do this? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com __ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture... http://www.monkeynoodle.org/resume.html Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Signatures on packages....
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 12:06, Charles A Edwards wrote: On 12 Jun 2003 11:53:00 -0700 James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're right, but my understanding from Warly during the various beta and rc cycles was that anything in release contrib is resigned with MDK's sig before release. (at least there where a lot of people checking this point for him.) with cooker contrib yes... this is a problem. (and people are always noting bad sigs there.) However nothing new gets added to release contrib does it? It would seem that updates would go into update not straight into contrib. But maybe I'm mistaken. Many/most contrib rpms Do Not contain the builders signature Only the Mandrake sig. These will all install without error. It is Only the contrib rpms which Have been signed by the builder that give the sig error during installation. You have 2 choice you can import the sigs from a key.server for you root keyring or you can disregard the sig error. Disregarding the error will in no way compromise security as all contrib rpms are Still verified to contain the Mandrake sig. Charles But if I'm reading correctly doesn't re-sign say that if you sign a package and I sign a package then if the end user has either key it will show up correctly? Either way it seems rather silly to me to have items on the contribs disk which don't have a key sig that the end user can use. Hardly user friendly. James Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Vmware kai IPAQ
thanks for the help. 12 2003 22:06, / James Sparenberg : On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 11:32, manolis wrote: 12 2003 06:01, / James Sparenberg : Question here... is it a USB device? Really dirty way might be to do /etc/init.d/usb stop before loading then /etc/init.d/usb start after it's discovered. Don't have one to test this theory on ... just an idea. yes it is a usb device. I don't want to disable USB, I want to leave the device alone (it cannot be used anyway) to use it with vmware machine. manolis Manolis, I'm not much into USB myself (don't have the cash for the toys I really want.*grin*) However man hotplug or info hotplug could well be your friend there is a file in /etc/hotplug called blacklist. My understanding is that you can tell hotplug not to react to specific devices here (in this case it would be the device Linux thinks you have I believe you said it was a scanner.) then vmware handles it from there. Since I don't have much in the way of USB here. http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net/ Is the website for hotplug more info might be there as well. But my best opinion on this would be that hotplug would be the key since it controls how usb devices are handled. James __ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Problem with eth0: eht0:9 ?????
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 12:46, Francisco Alcaraz wrote: A friend of mine is trying to have Internet runing Mandrake 9.1; it has a cable-modem very similar to the mine and the same internet provider. dhcp-client also installed, but until now it has been impossible to have the network runing :-(. I have tryed to help him but I have seen some rare messages using dmesg and ifconfig; unfortunately I can't understand if those messages are giving ideads about how to solve the problem; so I would like to look for help; perhaps someone in the expert list could understand the messages and help us to resolve the problem. It has a Pentium IV with an ethernet card (eth0); under windows the internet conection is runing fine :-( Those are the dmesg lines related with eth0: 8139too Fast Ethernet driver 0.9.26 eth0: RealTek RTL8139 Fast Ethernet at 0xe0945000, 00:40:f4:77:bc:82, IRQ 19 eth0: Identified 8139 chip type 'RTL-8139C' . .. . eth0: Setting half-duplex based on auto-negotiated partner ability . NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out eth0: Tx queue start entry 4 dirty entry 0. eth0: Tx descriptor 0 is 2000. (queue head) eth0: Tx descriptor 1 is 2000. eth0: Tx descriptor 2 is 2000. eth0: Tx descriptor 3 is 2000. eth0: Setting half-duplex based on auto-negotiated partner ability . zcip uses obsolete (PF_INET,SOCK_PACKET) eth0: Promiscuous mode enabled. device eth0 entered promiscuous mode device eth0 left promiscuous mode NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out eth0: Tx queue start entry 4 dirty entry 0. eth0: Tx descriptor 0 is 2000. (queue head) eth0: Tx descriptor 1 is 2000. eth0: Tx descriptor 2 is 2000. eth0: Tx descriptor 3 is 2000. eth0: Setting half-duplex based on auto-negotiated partner ability . .. . NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out eth0: Tx queue start entry 4 dirty entry 0. eth0: Tx descriptor 0 is 2000. (queue head) eth0: Tx descriptor 1 is 2000. eth0: Tx descriptor 2 is 2000. eth0: Tx descriptor 3 is 2000. eth0: Setting half-duplex based on auto-negotiated partner ability . ---O Ifconfig results: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:F4:77:BC:82 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:19 Base address:0x5000 eth0:9Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:F4:77:BC:82 inet addr:169.254.162.175 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Interrupt:19 Base address:0x5000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:206 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:206 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:12266 (11.9 Kb) TX bytes:12266 (11.9 Kb) What's the meaning of eth0:9 Any help will be welcome; thanks so much in advance; yours sincerely it means it can't do anything else so it creates this by default ... I had similar problems and doing rpm -e zcip tmdns solved my problem and I was able to start working again. (and even configure the dang thing.) Seems zcip just doesn't like some cards. James Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] HP 315 Digital Camera
Hi Does anyone know how I could get my HP 315 Digital Camera to work with Mandrake 9.1 Which program should I use? Thanks Derick Schmidt Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] lufsmount
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 14:33, James Sparenberg wrote: On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 07:21, Brian V Bonini wrote: Anyone familiar with lufs know where it's looking for these files so I can link or something. $ lufsmount sshfs://[EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt liblufs-sshfs.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory unsupported file system: sshfs don't use lufs I use a variant of it called shfs. I've got two notes. One with shfs it would be lufsmount shfs (note the single s) etc etc. second... did you verify that the kernel module is loaded? I just needed to add /usr/local/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf but even after that I never got it to establish a successful connection. It just died with a could not mount... message. I also tried shfs but same deal... When I run it it prompts me for a password but then just hangs and never successfully mounts the remote FS. Am I missing something? mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt Did verify that the kernel module was loaded. But, I think maybe this is the issue: Requirements * Linux 2.4 system, kernel 2.4.9 or later * tar, gzip, make * C compiler (gcc) used for building your kernel * AMD automounter (am-utils) installed, if you want cd /shfs/user%host support. ]$ uname -r 2.4.19-16mdk Since I've not updated the kernel enough to do it from memory can someone recommend a reference source? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Problem with eth0: eht0:9 ?????
Thanks so much James, I wil comunicate this to my friend (Angel); I hope he will finally be able to start internet under mandrake 9.1; hi has a computer shop and it thinking about offer some computers with linux installed. Regards, it means it can't do anything else so it creates this by default ... I had similar problems and doing rpm -e zcip tmdns solved my problem and I was able to start working again. (and even configure the dang thing.) Seems zcip just doesn't like some cards. James -- Francisco Alcaraz Ariza Murcia, España (Spain) Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Wanted to try wine
On Thursday 12 June 2003 01:01 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 12 June 2003 01:56 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 09:30, João Candido Araujo Milasch Filho wrote: I've tried dozen of times to install wine successfully on mandrake to run half-life and its mods. The last try, i could install half-life. but i could not run it. So, I'd give up. [...] Lot of people who game have had nice luck with the transgaming version of wine. At least they tell you up front what will/won't work. As for Alpha... shoot wine has been in alpha for what, 10 years now *grin*. (dang hard to shoot a moving and invisible target.) I have played Half-Life and Deus Ex twice each through wine. I got Half-Life working the first time with regular old wine. I've had better success with winex since. praedor - -- Patriotism as practiced in the USA is blindly accepting, noncritical, and silently following along. It is very fascist in form, not democratic at all. - --Ani DeFranco -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+6M4FaKr9sJYeTxgRAvD6AKC2M/AgVWGy22tnnG+jZXTTZK8AeQCfVsmi eLQz1pqVO6RjRR9LRU701EY= =0b9B -END PGP SIGNATURE- I play StarCraft and Total Annhilation on MDK 9.0 using CodeWeavers wine. It's a bit hard to find on their site now that they've gone commercial but I believe it's under Technology . -- Ken Thompson WA7SYR Payette, Idaho Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux- Coming Soon To A Desktop Near You Registered Linux User #183936 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] HP 315 Digital Camera
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 22:47, Derick Schmidt wrote: Hi Does anyone know how I could get my HP 315 Digital Camera to work with Mandrake 9.1 Which program should I use? I have the hp318 which I understand to be compatible with the HP315. I use gphoto2 to extract images from the camera. Before I got gphoto2 working, I used a USB based Sandisk CF reader which mounts the CF as a scsi device. You can then just move images from the mounted filesystem. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] lufsmount
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 13:50, Brian V Bonini wrote: On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 14:33, James Sparenberg wrote: On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 07:21, Brian V Bonini wrote: Anyone familiar with lufs know where it's looking for these files so I can link or something. $ lufsmount sshfs://[EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt liblufs-sshfs.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory unsupported file system: sshfs don't use lufs I use a variant of it called shfs. I've got two notes. One with shfs it would be lufsmount shfs (note the single s) etc etc. second... did you verify that the kernel module is loaded? I just needed to add /usr/local/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf but even after that I never got it to establish a successful connection. It just died with a could not mount... message. I also tried shfs but same deal... When I run it it prompts me for a password but then just hangs and never successfully mounts the remote FS. Am I missing something? mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt Did verify that the kernel module was loaded. But, I think maybe this is the issue: Requirements * Linux 2.4 system, kernel 2.4.9 or later * tar, gzip, make * C compiler (gcc) used for building your kernel * AMD automounter (am-utils) installed, if you want cd /shfs/user%host support. ]$ uname -r 2.4.19-16mdk Since I've not updated the kernel enough to do it from memory can someone recommend a reference source? Your kernel is good I know I've got it working on boxes with this kernel. Also too if it didn't build right the module wouldn't load. or rather shouldn't. *grin* One question are you going through a firewall? Better yet can you do this to your self. mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt or shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt this should tell you if it's working at all. James __ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Problem with eth0: eht0:9 ?????
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 13:52, Francisco Alcaraz wrote: Thanks so much James, I wil comunicate this to my friend (Angel); I hope he will finally be able to start internet under mandrake 9.1; hi has a computer shop and it thinking about offer some computers with linux installed. Regards, Hope it helps (fingers crossed) it means it can't do anything else so it creates this by default ... I had similar problems and doing rpm -e zcip tmdns solved my problem and I was able to start working again. (and even configure the dang thing.) Seems zcip just doesn't like some cards. James Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Change default editor.
Christian Dysthe grabbed a keyboard and wrote: I would like to globally change the default editor in Mandrake 9.1 (vim I think) to another one. How can that be done? I have been looking around and been asking on IRC, but I am not able to make it work. To be clear: I *never* want vim to open any file. I want another editor to simply replace vim by default. In your .profile (.bash_login or whichever you have for setting up your various variables and things when you login), put the following lines: export EDITOR=joe export VISUAL=$EDITOR Replace joe with your editor of choice. The reason for putting both lines above is that some programs use $EDITOR and some use $VISUAL to see which editor you want. If you want to have a different visual editor in place, then set $VISUAL to that editor. I always want the same editor no matter which is being used by the program in question so I set them this way. --Dave -- David Guntner GEnie: Just say NO! http://www.akaMail.com/pgpkey/davidg or key server for PGP Public key Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] lufsmount
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:08, James Sparenberg wrote: Your kernel is good I know I've got it working on boxes with this kernel. Also too if it didn't build right the module wouldn't load. or rather shouldn't. *grin* One question are you going through a firewall? Better yet can you do this to your self. mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt or shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt this should tell you if it's working at all. Oh yes, the firewall, I did not even think of that. I just assumed that if SSH was working this would as well. I can do mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt successfully. But, I tried opening up the DMZ host and still it just hangs here: # mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt/gfx [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: I can see it creates a key locally in known_hosts but not on the remote end for what ever that may be worth. It is a FreeBSD box on the remote end if that makes a diff thought I don't see why it would. What ports does it need? Maybe my ISP is blocking which is the whole reason I can not use NFS or Samba to begin with and am looking for alt's # lsmod | grep shfs shfs 29272 0 (autoclean) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[expert] ATTN: James Sparenburg
hi james, i accidentally deleted your reply to my popup query, saw it on the archives :) thanks for getting back, is it possible to block such things generally or do i just have to either disable java or block the popup ip? bascule -- Ahahahahaha! Ahahahaha! Aahahaha! BEWARE! Yrs sincerely The Opera Ghost (Maskerade) Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] lufsmount
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 14:32, Brian V Bonini wrote: On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:08, James Sparenberg wrote: Your kernel is good I know I've got it working on boxes with this kernel. Also too if it didn't build right the module wouldn't load. or rather shouldn't. *grin* One question are you going through a firewall? Better yet can you do this to your self. That would be correct... it is supposed to work that way... hmmm let me see something. I'll try and connect to a FreeBSD box (it should be back up soon) I have access to and see what does/doesn't work here. James mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt or shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt this should tell you if it's working at all. Oh yes, the firewall, I did not even think of that. I just assumed that if SSH was working this would as well. I can do mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt successfully. But, I tried opening up the DMZ host and still it just hangs here: # mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt/gfx [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: I can see it creates a key locally in known_hosts but not on the remote end for what ever that may be worth. It is a FreeBSD box on the remote end if that makes a diff thought I don't see why it would. What ports does it need? Maybe my ISP is blocking which is the whole reason I can not use NFS or Samba to begin with and am looking for alt's # lsmod | grep shfs shfs 29272 0 (autoclean) Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Signatures on packages....
On 12 Jun 2003 13:34:29 -0700 James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But if I'm reading correctly doesn't re-sign say that if you sign a package and I sign a package then if the end user has either key it will show up correctly? I would think that instead of --resign that --addsign is being used to include the Mandrake key (either can be used on signed Or non-signed rpms) but --resign is more properly used to revoke/replace the current sig. The problem involving signs and Contrib has arisen due to a miss-understanding by some of the contributers. Contrib rpms should only be signed If they are being sent to Lenny via Incoming. If the packager has upload access and are committing the rpms themselves, they Should Not be signed. This has today been discussed on the cooker list so that hopefully it will soon be a non-issue. Charles -- The best way to preserve a right is to exercise it, and the right to smoke is a right worth dying for. - Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [expert] lufsmount
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 14:32, Brian V Bonini wrote: On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:08, James Sparenberg wrote: Your kernel is good I know I've got it working on boxes with this kernel. Also too if it didn't build right the module wouldn't load. or rather shouldn't. *grin* One question are you going through a firewall? Better yet can you do this to your self. mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt or shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt this should tell you if it's working at all. Oh yes, the firewall, I did not even think of that. I just assumed that if SSH was working this would as well. I can do mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt successfully. But, I tried opening up the DMZ host and still it just hangs here: # mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt/gfx [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: I can see it creates a key locally in known_hosts but not on the remote end for what ever that may be worth. It is a FreeBSD box on the remote end if that makes a diff thought I don't see why it would. What ports does it need? Maybe my ISP is blocking which is the whole reason I can not use NFS or Samba to begin with and am looking for alt's # lsmod | grep shfs shfs 29272 0 (autoclean) Brian, Went a little further, I tried to use. shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt/disk. didn't work but I got a permission denied error. but shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/james /mnt/disk did mount my home directory... could depend on how tight permissions are set up. shfs does use port 22 normally. (standard ssh port) I don't get a key setup on the remote end either. One thing though.. This box is setup specifically with ssh2. A number of FreeBSD boxes are actually running ssh1 (moded heavily but still ssh1) Is it possible that your is running ssh1 on FreeBSD and your Linux box is ssh2, hence the disconnect? Sorry but since I can't see/dup your errors it's hard to diagnose. Other thoughts. Is there anything in either your local logs or in the remote systems logs that help? James Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] ATTN: James Sparenburg
and i spelt your name wrong, sheesh! bascule On Thursday 12 Jun 2003 10:32 pm, bascule wrote: hi james, i accidentally deleted your reply to my popup query, saw it on the archives :) thanks for getting back, is it possible to block such things generally or do i just have to either disable java or block the popup ip? bascule -- 'You know me,' said Rincewind. 'Just when I'm getting a grip on something Fate comes along and jumps on my fingers.' (Interesting Times) Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] lufsmount
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:46, James Sparenberg wrote: On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 14:32, Brian V Bonini wrote: Oh yes, the firewall, I did not even think of that. I just assumed that if SSH was working this would as well. I can do mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt successfully. But, I tried opening up the DMZ host and still it just hangs here: # mount -t shfs [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt/gfx [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: I can see it creates a key locally in known_hosts but not on the remote end for what ever that may be worth. It is a FreeBSD box on the remote end if that makes a diff thought I don't see why it would. What ports does it need? Maybe my ISP is blocking which is the whole reason I can not use NFS or Samba to begin with and am looking for alt's # lsmod | grep shfs shfs 29272 0 (autoclean) That would be correct... it is supposed to work that way... hmmm let me see something. I'll try and connect to a FreeBSD box (it should be back up soon) I have access to and see what does/doesn't work here. Ok I just tried it on another remote server that's running mdk and it connected right away. I also tried it on another remote server running RedHat that's in the same data center as the BSD box and it was fine as well. Jeez, where was my trouble shooting hat today.. ;-) So, it's appearing to be a FreeBSD issues thus far. Curious to know what your results are. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] ATTN: James Sparenburg
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 14:32, bascule wrote: hi james, i accidentally deleted your reply to my popup query, saw it on the archives :) thanks for getting back, is it possible to block such things generally or do i just have to either disable java or block the popup ip? bascule Bascule.. Honestly don't think anyone has come up with a work around for this. Disabling java would work for sure. May be the only option right now since it's so new. As for the rest.. If I understand correctly I'm under the impression that the popup blocking only works for javascript ... not java. James Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Signatures on packages....
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 14:54, Charles A Edwards wrote: On 12 Jun 2003 13:34:29 -0700 James Sparenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But if I'm reading correctly doesn't re-sign say that if you sign a package and I sign a package then if the end user has either key it will show up correctly? I would think that instead of --resign that --addsign is being used to include the Mandrake key (either can be used on signed Or non-signed rpms) but --resign is more properly used to revoke/replace the current sig. The problem involving signs and Contrib has arisen due to a miss-understanding by some of the contributers. Contrib rpms should only be signed If they are being sent to Lenny via Incoming. If the packager has upload access and are committing the rpms themselves, they Should Not be signed. This has today been discussed on the cooker list so that hopefully it will soon be a non-issue. Charles Your right I got resign and addsign backwards. Still it would seem strange that a release version wouldn't be signed. Wish I had my disks to verify this one James Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] ATTN: James Sparenburg
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 15:04, bascule wrote: and i spelt your name wrong, sheesh! bascule so used to it I don't even notice everyone spells it British instead of German. *grin* James On Thursday 12 Jun 2003 10:32 pm, bascule wrote: hi james, i accidentally deleted your reply to my popup query, saw it on the archives :) thanks for getting back, is it possible to block such things generally or do i just have to either disable java or block the popup ip? bascule Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] lufsmount
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 18:03, James Sparenberg wrote: Went a little further, I tried to use. shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt/disk. didn't work but I got a permission denied error. but shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/james /mnt/disk did mount my home directory... could depend on how tight permissions are set up. shfs does use port 22 normally. (standard ssh port) I don't get a key setup on the remote end either. One thing though.. This box is setup specifically with ssh2. A number of FreeBSD boxes are actually running ssh1 (moded heavily but still ssh1) Is it possible that your is running ssh1 on FreeBSD and your Linux box is ssh2, hence the disconnect? Sorry but since I can't see/dup your errors it's hard to diagnose. Other thoughts. Is there anything in either your local logs or in the remote systems logs that help? I could not get it to bite either way. But, assuming you saw my other email about the mdk and red hat boxes. Remote: ssh -v SSH Version OpenSSH_2.3.0 FreeBSD localisations 20010713, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. Compiled with SSL (0x0090605f). Local: # ssh -v OpenSSH_3.4p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090609f I think your onto something with the ssh1/ssh2, I was having trouble getting scp to work with an identity file the other day, I wonder if that's related. I also tried # shfsmount -O -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/user /mnt/gfx forcing ssh to use Protocol version 1 with no luck. THEN. I tried ANOTHER FreeBSD box in the same data center running a BSD and it works fine. I thought maybe it's had different OS or ssh versions but it appears it's the same OS version and SSH version. Broken Box %uname -a FreeBSD gfx-design.com 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0: Wed Aug 28 19:41:18 GMT 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/SERVER i386 ssh -V SSH Version OpenSSH_2.3.0 FreeBSD localisations 20010713, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. Compiled with SSL (0x0090605f). Good Box %uname -a FreeBSD gfx1-vps-r.gfx-design.com 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0: Wed Aug 28 19:41:18 GMT 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/SERVER i386 %ssh -V SSH Version OpenSSH_2.3.0 FreeBSD localisations 20010713, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. Compiled with SSL (0x0090605f). They look identical to me. One more question I've not figured out how to mount the remote FS so normal users can access it. Only been able to mount and access as local root. Tried running shfsmount as normal user and I get: $ shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt/gfx /mnt/gfx: Operation not permitted drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Jun 12 16:38 gfx Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] S3 Trio 3D and XFree86 4.3
There was a thread recently about running XFree 4.3 on the S3 Trio 3D, so I'm hoping one of those people may be able to help me get it working. I've got 2 boxes I am trying to configure with this chip in, and 2 very different monitors - and both produce the same problems. I would really like to get this working because of the things that don't work with the XFree 3.3 driver - including the RENDER extenstion problem. This is Mandrake 9.1, although I have seen some of the same problems in 9.0. In XFdrake, I have selected the XFree 4 S3virge driver, since the XFree86 site says this is the appropriate one. I then select my monitor, resolution, etc. Then, when I start X it gives a rather strange result: The left 2 thirds of the screen is perfect. The right third is a repeat of part of the left section. The right third of that third does the same thing - and so on for a few more times. In other words, it isn't really usable. Using the left 2 thirds of the screen, however, I have demonstrated to my satisfaction that the problems I experienced with XFree 3 do NOT appear in XFree 4. So I would really like to get it working properly. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Brian. _ Hotmail is now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/signup.asp Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Mdk 9.1 processors (was Pentium 4)
On Thursday 12 June 2003 03:19 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote: I am seriously looking at an Epox 87RD+ nvidia nforce2 board. It has EXCELLENT specs and an truly excellent price...but now I am given pause. I have no problem downloading an NVIDIA driver (I use the binary NVIDIA driver for my GeForce4 Ti4200) to get my mobo working in linux. Is there anyone on the list using an nforce2 board? Is all OK with the Nvidia driver? I think it will all work okay if you use the nvidia driver. if you do not, there are problems with the open nvnet and ide drivers, and I believe the agp stuff is not quite up to par either. If you don't have a problem with the binary drivers, than the nforce2 should work nicely. It just won't be an out of the box setup like a KT400 board is, there'll be more work to do. -- Greg Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] _M_str_putnext: queue overflow: dropping a message
All of a sudden I am getting this message all over my log files. _M_str_putnext: queue overflow: dropping a message I've done a google search and found a couple of vague references to network, but no real answers. Anybody know anything about this? -- Greg Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] S3 Trio 3D and XFree86 4.3
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 19:18, Brian Schroeder wrote: There was a thread recently about running XFree 4.3 on the S3 Trio 3D, so I'm hoping one of those people may be able to help me get it working. I've got 2 boxes I am trying to configure with this chip in, and 2 very different monitors - and both produce the same problems. I would really like to get this working because of the things that don't work with the XFree 3.3 driver - including the RENDER extenstion problem. This is Mandrake 9.1, although I have seen some of the same problems in 9.0. In XFdrake, I have selected the XFree 4 S3virge driver, since the XFree86 site says this is the appropriate one. I then select my monitor, resolution, etc. Then, when I start X it gives a rather strange result: The left 2 thirds of the screen is perfect. The right third is a repeat of part of the left section. The right third of that third does the same thing - and so on for a few more times. In other words, it isn't really usable. Using the left 2 thirds of the screen, however, I have demonstrated to my satisfaction that the problems I experienced with XFree 3 do NOT appear in XFree 4. So I would really like to get it working properly. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Brian. I brought up some issues here with a particular S3 video card that refused to work well under Mandrake 9.1 and XFree86 4.3.0. It was rather lengthy and probably best searched through the archive than repeat it here. Your welcome to ask me off-line,though. As for your particular chip/video card, I can tell you that I have it working just fine under RedHat 9.0 with 4.x.x. (can't remember what the exact version is, but I believe its 4.3.0) It's a Jaton AGP-71 with 4 MB RAM using the S3 Trio 3D chip. With an older Dell 17 connected to it, 1024x768x16 bit seems to work at its best. I don't recall if I tried this card under any version of Mandrake. Some S3 video cards will work in RedHat that won't work at all or well enough in Mandrake. Most would tell you that your better off replacing the card. T Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] _M_str_putnext: queue overflow: dropping a message
On Thursday 12 June 2003 07:35 pm, Greg Meyer wrote: All of a sudden I am getting this message all over my log files. _M_str_putnext: queue overflow: dropping a message I've done a google search and found a couple of vague references to network, but no real answers. Anybody know anything about this? Nevermind, I think it has something to do with the martian source entries I have been getting for a while. Still can't track it down. Nothing on my network has really changed. I may try and do a clean install and see if that stops it. -- Greg Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] _M_str_putnext: queue overflow: dropping a message
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:08, Greg Meyer wrote: On Thursday 12 June 2003 07:35 pm, Greg Meyer wrote: All of a sudden I am getting this message all over my log files. _M_str_putnext: queue overflow: dropping a message I've done a google search and found a couple of vague references to network, but no real answers. Anybody know anything about this? Nevermind, I think it has something to do with the martian source entries I have been getting for a while. Still can't track it down. Nothing on my network has really changed. I may try and do a clean install and see if that stops it. Do you have a win2k box on your network? Why I'm asking is that I had a box getting Martian source errors... the other day ... one of our guys shutdown a win2k box (actually just pulled the cable) and they stopped. Don't know if or how it got fixed (not sure it did) but at least that was the culprit. James Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] S3 Trio 3D and XFree86 4.3
On Thursday 12 June 2003 05:18 pm, Brian Schroeder wrote: There was a thread recently about running XFree 4.3 on the S3 Trio 3D, so I'm hoping one of those people may be able to help me get it working. I'm using 9.0 and had to set it up for it. I had the same problems with 8.0, 8.1 and 8.2. As I recall the /etc/X11/XF86Config file had to edited manually to include a different set of timings and then reset the /etc/X11/X link to point to XFree86. I/m going to set up 9.1 next week when I get time. Then I'll give you a rundown. -- It said use windows 95 or better so I loaded linux! In a world without walls and fences who needs windows and gates? Kelley Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] Progear?
This is probably a dumb question, but... Has anyone managed to get 9.1 (or any other MDK for that matter), running on a Progear 1050? (It's an older tablet style gadget w/ a transmeta (3200?) processor.) From what I'm reading, it _should_ work, but it'd be nice to hear from anyone with actual experience (even if it's only transmeta specific...) Thanks, -Jason = 'It's easy to hold everything in common when no one's got anything.' (Maskerade) Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] lufsmount
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 15:58, Brian V Bonini wrote: On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 18:03, James Sparenberg wrote: Went a little further, I tried to use. shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt/disk. didn't work but I got a permission denied error. but shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/james /mnt/disk did mount my home directory... could depend on how tight permissions are set up. shfs does use port 22 normally. (standard ssh port) I don't get a key setup on the remote end either. One thing though.. This box is setup specifically with ssh2. A number of FreeBSD boxes are actually running ssh1 (moded heavily but still ssh1) Is it possible that your is running ssh1 on FreeBSD and your Linux box is ssh2, hence the disconnect? Sorry but since I can't see/dup your errors it's hard to diagnose. Other thoughts. Is there anything in either your local logs or in the remote systems logs that help? I could not get it to bite either way. But, assuming you saw my other email about the mdk and red hat boxes. Remote: ssh -v SSH Version OpenSSH_2.3.0 FreeBSD localisations 20010713, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. Compiled with SSL (0x0090605f). Local: # ssh -v OpenSSH_3.4p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090609f I think your onto something with the ssh1/ssh2, I was having trouble getting scp to work with an identity file the other day, I wonder if that's related. I also tried # shfsmount -O -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/user /mnt/gfx forcing ssh to use Protocol version 1 with no luck. THEN. I tried ANOTHER FreeBSD box in the same data center running a BSD and it works fine. I thought maybe it's had different OS or ssh versions but it appears it's the same OS version and SSH version. Broken Box %uname -a FreeBSD gfx-design.com 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0: Wed Aug 28 19:41:18 GMT 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/SERVER i386 ssh -V SSH Version OpenSSH_2.3.0 FreeBSD localisations 20010713, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. Compiled with SSL (0x0090605f). Good Box %uname -a FreeBSD gfx1-vps-r.gfx-design.com 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0: Wed Aug 28 19:41:18 GMT 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/SERVER i386 %ssh -V SSH Version OpenSSH_2.3.0 FreeBSD localisations 20010713, protocol versions 1.5/2.0. Compiled with SSL (0x0090605f). They look identical to me. Let me see if I can ping some of my FreeBSD friends and see if this means anything to them. One question are the sshd_config files the same? One more question I've not figured out how to mount the remote FS so normal users can access it. Only been able to mount and access as local root. Tried running shfsmount as normal user and I get: $ shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt/gfx /mnt/gfx: Operation not permitted drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Jun 12 16:38 gfx The only way I've found is to make shfsmount and shfsumount run suid root. I suppose doing sudo on these would also work. Also make sure the user owns /mnt/gfx I've had better luck if my users create their mount directory inside their home directory. Other thing do shfsmount [EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/uname /mnt/somedir the /home/uname mounts only the users home dir instead of the full file system... much nicer. Note that there is no space between domanin and the first / . Works here... don't like the syntax but it works. __ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] _M_str_putnext: queue overflow: dropping a message
On Thursday 12 June 2003 08:15 pm, James Sparenberg wrote: On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:08, Greg Meyer wrote: On Thursday 12 June 2003 07:35 pm, Greg Meyer wrote: All of a sudden I am getting this message all over my log files. _M_str_putnext: queue overflow: dropping a message I've done a google search and found a couple of vague references to network, but no real answers. Anybody know anything about this? Nevermind, I think it has something to do with the martian source entries I have been getting for a while. Still can't track it down. Nothing on my network has really changed. I may try and do a clean install and see if that stops it. Do you have a win2k box on your network? Why I'm asking is that I had a Yes I do, but it has been running for quite some time, but now that I think about it, the motherboard failed in it about two months ago and I swapped it out for an old KT133a board I had lying around. Same nic, but it could be the change in board somehow changedd the personality of the machine. The other thing that changed about it is that the Norton AV subscription expired awhile back and periodically a box pops up asking me to renew. I haven't taken the time to go beyond clicking no, remind me in a day, but perhaps that message box routine sends out some strange packets or something. box getting Martian source errors... the other day ... one of our guys shutdown a win2k box (actually just pulled the cable) and they stopped. Don't know if or how it got fixed (not sure it did) but at least that was the culprit. I can't turn off the box, but I'll unplug it from the network overnight tonight. -- Greg Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Bad trouble here (db stuff)
On Thursday 12 June 2003 02:43 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote: Is the xfont error the only 1 you get or to also get an error for a missing .so file use rpm -q and verify that XFree-libs is still installed. If you Are getting the missing so error use rpm -q and verify that XFree86-libs is still installed. Install it if it is not and reboot. Charles I did that, it claims its still installed. I guess I'll have to try to do a rescue/repair from CD1. Thanks for trying to help though! :-) Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] Ultimate background.
Hoping to inject a bit of humor with this one It's intended for all who worship Linux. http://www.penguinisto.serverpro2.com/CG_Gallery/humor/worship001a.html James Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Dumbest thing you have ever done as Root?
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 07:44 am, JOHAM,DAVID (HP-Boise,ex1) wrote: # cat cdrom.img /dev/hda I learned a *lot* about Linux that night... Rank me as a newbie if you must, but I am really curious how that would mess things up? -- Linux: For the people, by the people. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Dumbest thing you have ever done as Root?
Rob Blomquist wrote: # cat cdrom.img /dev/hda Rank me as a newbie if you must, but I am really curious how that would mess things up? consider yourself ranked. that command would write the contents of file X (cdrom.img in this case) onto the primary master, I'm gonna guess in his case it was his main hard drive. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] S3 Trio 3D and XFree86 4.3
Thanks Kelley. I will look forward to hearing. Do you have any hints for me to try out over the weekend - pointers in the, hopefully, right direction? Brina. From: kb [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thursday 12 June 2003 05:18 pm, Brian Schroeder wrote: There was a thread recently about running XFree 4.3 on the S3 Trio 3D, so I'm hoping one of those people may be able to help me get it working. I'm using 9.0 and had to set it up for it. I had the same problems with 8.0, 8.1 and 8.2. As I recall the /etc/X11/XF86Config file had to edited manually to include a different set of timings and then reset the /etc/X11/X link to point to XFree86. I/m going to set up 9.1 next week when I get time. Then I'll give you a rundown. Kelley Terry [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Hotmail is now available on Australian mobile phones. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilecentral/signup.asp Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] SpamAssassin 2.5
is there some reason why there's no 2.5 SA RPM for Mandrake? Not even in Club, which is surprising. I'm about ready to get off my duff and do it myself, but first: is someone else working on it? has someone else given up because it wasn't feasible? -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture... http://www.monkeynoodle.org/resume.html Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Progear?
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:31, PlugHead wrote: This is probably a dumb question, but... Has anyone managed to get 9.1 (or any other MDK for that matter), running on a Progear 1050? (It's an older tablet style gadget w/ a transmeta (3200?) processor.) From what I'm reading, it _should_ work, but it'd be nice to hear from anyone with actual experience (even if it's only transmeta specific...) Thanks, -Jason look for vaio c-series laptops -- they have transmetas. Basically no different than any other acpi laptop, only you use longrun instead of speedstep to manage power :-) -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture... http://www.monkeynoodle.org/resume.html Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Ultimate background.
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 18:18, James Sparenberg wrote: Hoping to inject a bit of humor with this one It's intended for all who worship Linux. http://www.penguinisto.serverpro2.com/CG_Gallery/humor/worship001a.html James Dunno, I've always been a fan of: http://www.despair.com/limitations.html :-) -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture... http://www.monkeynoodle.org/resume.html Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Dumbest thing you have ever done as Root?
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 14:20, Jason Guidry wrote: Rob Blomquist wrote: # cat cdrom.img /dev/hda Rank me as a newbie if you must, but I am really curious how that would mess things up? consider yourself ranked. that command would write the contents of file X (cdrom.img in this case) onto the primary master, I'm gonna guess in his case it was his main hard drive. more to the point, replacing what was already there. -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture... http://www.monkeynoodle.org/resume.html Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] HP 315 Digital Camera
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 19:47, Derick Schmidt wrote: Hi Does anyone know how I could get my HP 315 Digital Camera to work with Mandrake 9.1 Which program should I use? Thanks Derick Schmidt mine's a 318, pretty close. On the camera you set this PC access mode that tells it to be a disk drive, then turn it off, plug it in, turn it back on, and you should be able to mount /mnt/camera. If Mandrake didn't auto-detect, then try mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 /mnt/camera -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture... http://www.monkeynoodle.org/resume.html Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Gnome and Nautilus configuration
I am constantly stumbling against GNOME themes configuration. I am trying to add a new icon theme (Conectiva Crystal, included with Mandrake 9.1) to Gnome, but I can't find the way to do it... I tried dragging it from Nautilus to the theme window, pointing to it in gconf... I wish GNOME developers had'nt taken so much out of the configuration dept. Anyway, is there some explanation on how to do it for drake 9.1? The instructions on art.gnome.org don't seem to work for me. TIA you can try to put the theme in themes path , /usr/share/themes/ after you can see this on the config theme windowd of gnome i hope this help you Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Dumbest thing you have ever done as Root?
On Thursday 12 June 2003 02:20 pm, Jason Guidry wrote: Rob Blomquist wrote: # cat cdrom.img /dev/hda Rank me as a newbie if you must, but I am really curious how that would mess things up? consider yourself ranked. that command would write the contents of file X (cdrom.img in this case) onto the primary master, I'm gonna guess in his case it was his main hard drive. Yeah, but cdrom.img is only 1.4Mb in size, hardly enough to do much damage. -- Linux: For the people, by the people. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Dumbest thing you have ever done as Root?
On September 1993 plus 3569 days DAVID JOHAM wrote: # cat cdrom.img /dev/hda rm -rf /path/to/some/dir /* Yup...that's a space between the last dir and the last slash...it wasn't fun to recover...the box was in a different country :) Vox -- Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs. Kind of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use _higher_ technology than everyone else. -- Donald B. Marti Jr. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [expert] SpamAssassin 2.5
Here I go having another conversation with myself... Hi self, how's it going? Not too bad. Spot of trouble with an RPM, but can't complain overall. On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 20:09, Jack Coates wrote: is there some reason why there's no 2.5 SA RPM for Mandrake? Not even in Club, which is surprising. I'm about ready to get off my duff and do it myself, but first: is someone else working on it? It's in cooker, but won't install easily on my server because of a bazillion Perl dependency issues. has someone else given up because it wasn't feasible? Dunno about not feasible, but not easy. I started whacking at it with the Mandrake RPM Howto and chose the modify 2.44's spec file path. On the server, bad things happen because I can't even get sitelib: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jack]$ perl -V:sitelib Can't locate Config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i686-linux /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/i686-linux /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .). BEGIN failed--compilation aborted. ew... this is the result of too many upgrades, some CPAN installations, generally some ickiness that can get fixed at some other time. Tonight, let's try building RPMs on the laptop. Seems much better, we zip along nicely until: Finding Requires: /usr/lib/rpm/find-requires /home/jack/rpm/tmp/spamassassin-2.55-root i586 Using BuildRoot: /home/jack/rpm/tmp/spamassassin-2.55-root to search libs PreReq: rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 Requires: perl-HTML-Parser perl-base = 2:5.8.0 perl-base now that's kinda funny looking. So I poked around to figure out how that's gotten, and this is real funny: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jack]$ rpm -q --requires perl-HTML-Parser perl perl-HTML-Tagset = 3.03 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 ld-linux.so.2 libc.so.6 perl-base = 2:5.8.0 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) Am I being dense, or is this asking for a perl-base greater than or equal to version 2:5.8.0? As in the 2: is throwing a monkeywrench into the works? My perl-base is perl-base-5.8.0-19mdk. -- Jack Coates Monkeynoodle: A Scientific Venture... http://www.monkeynoodle.org/resume.html Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [expert] Mdk 9.1 processors (was Pentium 4)
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:28:12 -0400 Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 12 June 2003 03:19 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote: I am seriously looking at an Epox 87RD+ nvidia nforce2 board. It has EXCELLENT specs and an truly excellent price...but now I am given pause. I have no problem downloading an NVIDIA driver (I use the binary NVIDIA driver for my GeForce4 Ti4200) to get my mobo working in linux. Is there anyone on the list using an nforce2 board? Is all OK with the Nvidia driver? I think it will all work okay if you use the nvidia driver. if you do not, there are problems with the open nvnet and ide drivers, and I believe the agp stuff is not quite up to par either. If you don't have a problem with the binary drivers, than the nforce2 should work nicely. It just won't be an out of the box setup like a KT400 board is, there'll be more work to do. -- Greg Joerg is using an Asus A7N8X mobo. He had no major probs getting it running. I beleive he is using the NForce2 on that. He did 2 lilo.conf changes to get it running. You could compare prices before you leap, or leap and take your chances. -- Michael Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[expert] 2.4.21.0.18mdk-1-1 - IRQ Balancing still not fixed...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * IRQ balancing has been fixed for SMP Incorrect. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# uname -a Linux mail1 2.4.21-0.18mdkenterprise #1 SMP Wed Jun 4 11:44:12 MDT 2003 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 0: 46423 0IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 2 0IO-APIC-edge keyboard 2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade 5: 0 0 IO-APIC-level usb-ohci 8: 1 0IO-APIC-edge rtc 14: 6 0IO-APIC-edge ide0 16: 16 0 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx 17: 16 0 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx 28: 5206 0 IO-APIC-level eth0 29: 4179 0 IO-APIC-level eth1 30: 11562 0 IO-APIC-level aacraid NMI: 0 0 LOC: 46328 46283 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 - -- Mark Watts Systems Engineer QinetiQ TIM St Andrews Road, Malvern GPG Public Key ID: 455420ED -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+6KheBn4EFUVUIO0RAun7AJ9wqckUCJdzLFaHCMb/Y4GDvKWJYQCeOQLE Imrck9wxxvfrCQOygO62rCI= =bCFF -END PGP SIGNATURE- Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
