On 12/7/2014 6:41 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:
>
My friend Bill who was having conversations with Jerry by phone a few
months ago has asked him for his take on the evening, but so far
Jarvis has not answered him.
>
/Why don't you just call Jerry on the phone yourself and say: "Jerry
this is Michael Jackson. Wassup?"/
>
*From:* "seerd...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]"
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Sunday, December 7, 2014 3:21 PM
*Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Jerry as a Proxy Vetting Agent
In my recent viewing of the Hammond tape, the camera cut several times
to audience shots Jerry (and Debbie) -- including what appeared to be
their rising to their feet for a "standing ovation" at the end (or
maybe they were just getting up to leave while still momentarily
clapping).
When things seemed a bit odd in the TMO (in pre 1975, before things
got far more weird, IMO), I used to look to Jerry as a sort of sanity
test / vetting process. That is, Jerry seemed fairly balanced,
intelligent, and rational. I assumed that if he was able to reconcile
TMO craziness, on the whole, given his larger access, context and
history to all things MMY and TMO, the ship was probably safe and
strong -- and headed in the right direction.
In retrospect, not my best decision, but at the time, as a teenager
and young adult, Jerry appeared to be one of the better anchors in
choppy waters.
I have little knowledge of Jerry's activities over the past 35 years
or so and thus I have little basis for placing much weight on his
current views. Yet, I still have at least some lingering respect for
Jerry from earlier days.
Has anyone talked to Jerry (or heard second hand) his reaction to the
Nov 30 talk (and or his presumed discussions with Hammond)?
