Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-05 Thread Peter

--- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Curtis wrote:
  Richard didn't need it,he just knows!
  
 Don't be a fool, Curtis, - there's not a single
 thing
 you can learn at a TTC, CCP, or ATC, that you can't
 learn right where you are sitting. Some of you TM
 teachers get all puffed up with pride at all your
 vaulted learning. Keep it simple - all you have to
 do is relax - you'd don't need to know anything
 about all the seven states of conciousness and how
 many yakshis are up in the tree. All you have to do 
 is stop your striving.

Now Richard, don't go all neo-advaita on us!




 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-05 Thread Peter

--- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Shemp wrote:
  Although your last two paragraphs get a bit flaky,
 
  Richard, I have to say this is one of the best
 damn 
  posts you've ever done.
  
 Thanks Shemp, but the last paragraph still stands.
 
   Franky, Peter, I'm surprised that I'm having to
 explain
   this to you, you being an educated doctor and
 all. You
   really suck as a TM teacher. But you suck even
 more as
   a cult exit counselor.

I seem to have missed the front half of this
conversation!





  
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Peter
Richard, are you a TM teacher? A Governor?

--- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   So, where, exactly, in SBAL does Maharishi talk
 about 
   demons?
  
 Curtis wrote: 
  What kind of line are you trying to draw here
 Richard?
 
 That almost all of the Maharishi trained TM teachers
 are 
 idiots and stoopid schmucks who all failed to
 understand
 the process of effortless transcending? That many of
 them 
 wanted TM to be a religion and Maharishi to be the
 Pope? 
 
 That many of them left the TMO when they realized
 that TM 
 was not a new reeligion? And that they
 mis-understood the 
 most basic teaching of Adwaita?
 
 So, where, exactly, anywhere, does Maharishi talk
 about 
 the demons?
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Vaj


On Feb 4, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Vaj wrote:

Most westerners would do well, for the sake of perspective, to look  
at what political movements these Vedic Fundies are associated with.  
I think they'd be downright shocked.



Unless of course Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Anally or some  
other right-wing wind-up doll happens to be your hero... :-)

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Vaj


On Feb 4, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:


Curtis wrote:
 My point was only concerning certain specific content.

My point was that I can't find any reference in SBAL
where the Maharishi talks about the demons of Hindu
mythology. Did he mention this at your TTC? According
to Ed, Maharishi mentions demons in SBAL.



He probably was thinking of M's 1/3 of the Gita translation.

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Duveyoung
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 2:25 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization
to teach TM)

 

Is anyone else besides the WAR MONGER thinking that I ever mentioned
demons being in the SBAL?

He was overwhelmingly answered by several other posters with several
quotations from the SBAL with my exact words, but after such, this massively
brain damaged person's  query having been satisfied entirely,  suddenly he's
talking about demons as if I ever used that word. 

Pure troll shit.

Hey, everyone..HEY HEY HEY..(Rick's party stops, music put on pause,
everyone stares at me, and I yell)  THIS GUY RIGHT HERE WITH THE MASSIVE
ASTRAL HEAD WOUND SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY -- AN AMBULANCE HAS BEEN
CALLED.

Congratulations, Edg. You finally “got” WillyTex.


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.19/1257 - Release Date: 2/3/2008
5:49 PM
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Vaj


On Feb 4, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Duveyoung wrote:



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, claudiouk [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:


 Never was myself a TM teacher and personally I WAS interested in
 MMY's commentary on the Gita and his SBAL - as an underlying
 universal spiritual perspective to the practice of TM, but one which
 was not forced down your throat (unless perhaps you became a
 teacher?). Because of that it WAS OK to see the technique
 independently, as a SECULAR procedure.

TM teachers got it across to everyone by a variety of methods  
right from the start:  the puja required one to kneel -- okay,  
they were invited, merely, to kneel, but I never had anyone not  
kneel over 2,000 pujas.  It was a religious rite, a worship -- plain  
and simple.


 The fact that mantras were sounds of Hindu significance was to be
 expected, given MMY's cultural background,

Jerry Jarvis made fun of the concept by saying we could be using  
sounds that were, in Chinese, the names of spices but that didn't  
make TM an act of cookery.  But it was a big fat lie and every  
teacher knew that the mantras were the names and attributes  of Gods  
that the Holy Tradition ADORED, and today, we openly SELL PRAYERS TO  
THESE GODS and call them yagyas.


but there was nothing in
 TM practice itself that resembled a religious practice - no required
 articles of faith, moral commandments to follow, nothing that
 resembled traditional prayer.

Meditate twice a day and take it easy.  THAT'S A RELIGIOUS  
COMMANDMENT.  If one didn't do it twice a day, the TM teacher was  
expected to challenge the meditator about that.it was a TM  
teacher's morality being imposed on them.  Take it easy meant a host  
of lifestyle changes that TM teachers slowly indoctrinated them with  
-- sleep by 10pm, no root veggies, no salt, no meat.these were  
especially seen in resident courses.  WE LET THEM KNOW WHAT WAS  
WHAT...even though it wasn't official, we sure knew it was.


Sitting with eyes closed, repeating a sound, after a puja -- this  
screams RELIGION.


Edg, the closer you look, the more you'll see (and this is a shocker  
for most westerners) that the root of TM are Vedic Fundamentalism and  
Hindu nationalism.


It's bizarrely parallel, in a somewhat different manner, to Christian  
Fundamentalism. Vedic Fundamentalism, from the POV of western tastes,  
appears very left to our western worldview, but in terms of India/ 
Bharat itself, it's similar to other right-wing nationalistic family  
value type movements in that it tries to be very puritanical and  
pretends to return to some imagined past. Instead of a Judeo-Christian  
Creation Science, these guys admonish a Vedic Creation Science  
provocatively (and very tenuously) connected to Quantum physics.  
Hinduism as a popular movement has lost most of it's Dionysian gnostic  
roots and has instead settled into a sentimental, puritanical form of  
Vaishnavism. Once, in the middle ages, the leanings of the merchant  
class; now it has become mainstream--much like the fundie megachurches  
of the American middle classes.


Most westerners would do well, for the sake of perspective, to look at  
what political movements these Vedic Fundies are associated with. I  
think they'd be downright shocked.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Peter

--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

  When someone claims to know more about TM than
 MMY,
  the conversation screeches to an immediate halt
 and
  one politely excuses oneself because they left
  something cooking on the stove, so sorry! We must
 chat
  later, yes, indeed.
 
 
 Ya gotta love the theater of the absurd performed by
 Nabby, Richard
 and me arguing about which one of us mad hatters
 understands MMY's
 teacher BETTER! What a moment of comedy on FFL!

It is pretty funny! Are Richard and Nabby even TM
teachers?



 
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  --- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard
 J.
   Williams
   willytex@ wrote:
   
Curtis wrote:
 So Richard claims to know more about TM 
 than MMY, but I claim to know more about 
 his teaching than people who haven't gone 
 through TTC. 

Maybe so, but you don't know more about TM
than I do regardless of your TTC claims. The
proof is here for anyone to read.
   
   I'm afraid that this ship sailed over 18 years
 ago
   Richard.  You want
   the crown, TM expert, it is all yours.  Have
 fun
   with it, I
   certainly did.
  
  When someone claims to know more about TM than
 MMY,
  the conversation screeches to an immediate halt
 and
  one politely excuses oneself because they left
  something cooking on the stove, so sorry! We must
 chat
  later, yes, indeed.
  
  
  
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   To subscribe, send a message to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   Or go to: 
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
   and click 'Join This Group!' 
   Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
  
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   
   
  
  
  
   


  Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
  http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Peter

--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J.
 Williams
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Curtis wrote:
   So Richard claims to know more about TM 
   than MMY, but I claim to know more about 
   his teaching than people who haven't gone 
   through TTC. 
  
  Maybe so, but you don't know more about TM
  than I do regardless of your TTC claims. The
  proof is here for anyone to read.
 
 I'm afraid that this ship sailed over 18 years ago
 Richard.  You want
 the crown, TM expert, it is all yours.  Have fun
 with it, I
 certainly did.

When someone claims to know more about TM than MMY,
the conversation screeches to an immediate halt and
one politely excuses oneself because they left
something cooking on the stove, so sorry! We must chat
later, yes, indeed.




 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs