[Bug 477371] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477371 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-15 03:21:58 EDT --- To quote the new naming guideline The use of the -fonts suffix is not dependant on the actual number of font files in the package. Also I had to change the templates and macros slightly to take into account the naming changes requested by FPC, so before it hits stable releases please use fontpackages-*-1.14 from rawhide to test your specs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 478891] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-15
03:28:50 EDT ---
np, there are lots of packagers which have not started working on it yer
1. You do not need the
%{_fontdir}/*.ttc line in %files
2. Do you actually need to declare the fonts in the legacy core fonts X11
system? If it's not 100% necessary life will be simpler without the fonts.scale
bit
3. If you install multiple fontconfig file you must find an expression rpm
accepts that can be used as argument to the -f call to %{fontconf} (generaly,
using ?? or other rpm wildcards)
Also please test with fontpackages-*-1.14 from rawhide
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477461] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-15 03:31:06 EDT --- The fontpackages-*-1.14 packages from rawhide (templates and macros) should enable you to respect the new naming easily (feel free to name the tex subpackage as you want) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'fedorafonts' |'fedorafonts,hdu' Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 15 09:08:40 + 2009 --- confirmed. I guess thats a task for framework. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |gentium-basic-fonts - |sil-gentium-fonts - |Gentium Basic Font Family |Gentium Basic Font Family Flag|needinfo?(rbhal...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #15 from Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com 2009-01-15 07:37:00 EDT --- Here are the updates according to new font packaging guidelines: SPEC URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts/sil-gentium-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts/sil-gentium-fonts-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 474514] file conflict on upgrading
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474514 James Antill james.ant...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-15 12:16:32 EDT --- Trying to implement this using freecol as an example, running into build errors: RPM build errors: File must begin with /: %_font_pkg File must begin with /: -n File must begin with /: aybabtu-fonts File must begin with /: lilypond/2.12.1/fonts/otf/aybabtu.otf File must begin with /: %_font_pkg File must begin with /: -n File must begin with /: centuryschl-fonts File must begin with /: lilypond/2.12.1/fonts/otf/CenturySchL*otf File must begin with /: %_font_pkg File must begin with /: -n File must begin with /: emmentaler-fonts File must begin with /: lilypond/2.12.1/fonts/otf/emmentaler*otf File must begin with /: %_font_pkg File must begin with /: -n File must begin with /: feta-fonts File must begin with /: lilypond/2.12.1/fonts/source/feta*mf Attaching current spec. Am I missing something obvious? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-15 12:16:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329111) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329111) Spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477441] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477441 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-15 12:20:09 EDT --- The tex docs generation was pulling in FreeSans, although, I don't know from where, as I didn't have freefont installed, and it doesn't come with the Physfs tarball. Nevertheless, there is no good reason to package the tex docs (and font) when the html docs are just fine. Fixed in rawhide (physfs-1.0.1-9.fc11). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477468] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468 --- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-15 13:02:00 EDT --- So, given the naming scheme: Fedora font packages are named [foundryname-][projectname-]fontfamilyname-fonts, in lowercase. The foundryname is tiresias. The projectname is tiresias. Upstream thinks that the familyname is tiresias, but there are arguably five font families here: infofont keyfont lpfont pcfont signfont Since the naming guidelines say When foundryname, projectname or fontfamilyname contain the font or fonts affix, it should be skipped to avoid foofont-fonts packages. This means that I should skip the fontfamilyname as well. This leaves me with tiresias-fonts, which is the current naming and packaging structure. Now, I could do: tiresias-info-fonts tiresias-key-fonts tiresias-lp-fonts tiresias-pc-fonts tiresias-sign-fonts But that would not be accurate. Please advise as to what I should do in this scenario. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477468] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-15 13:52:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) So, given the naming scheme: Fedora font packages are named [foundryname-][projectname-]fontfamilyname-fonts, in lowercase. The foundryname is tiresias. The projectname is tiresias. Right. So your font package names should be tiresias-fontfamilyname-fonts instead of tiresias-tiresias-fontfamilyname-fonts Upstream thinks that the familyname is tiresias, but there are arguably five font families here: infofont keyfont lpfont pcfont signfont Actually, it isn't the font family. I haven't repeated the definition of font family in the naming section, because it should already be introduced by the splitting rule submitted and approved before. But to repeat it from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_(2008-12-21) “ What is a font family? * A font family corresponds to one entry in GUI font lists. For example, DejaVu Sans, DejaVu Serif and DejaVu Sans Mono are three different font families. * A font family is subdivided in faces or styles. DejaVu Sans Normal, DejaVu Sans Bold, DejaVu Sans Condensed Italic are three faces of the DejaVu Sans font family. * The gnome-font-viewer command can be used to check the font family name and the font face/style declared by a font file.” Using the gnome-font-viewer command for example you'll see the infofont fonts declare the Tiresias Infofont and Tiresias Infofont Z (so you have two different families in this archive) for the first font set, you would get tiresias-fontfamilyname-fonts ⇒ tiresias-tiresias-infofont-fonts That should obviously normalise to tiresias-infofont-fonts, except I need to rework the wording a bit Since the naming guidelines say When foundryname, projectname or fontfamilyname contain the font or fonts affix, it should be skipped to avoid foofont-fonts packages. This should say the affix should be skipped instead of it should be skipped I didn't thought one could read it like you did tiresias-infofont-fonts ⇒ tiresias-info-fonts So the guidelines more or less work, and produce about the same naming as you proposed, except I need to rework some little points to avoid misinterpretations I've updated the guideline proposal with some clarifications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/freetype/devel .cvsignore, 1.20, 1.21 freetype.spec, 1.66, 1.67 sources, 1.20, 1.21
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28447
Modified Files:
.cvsignore freetype.spec sources
Log Message:
* Thu Jan 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2.3.8-1
- Update to 2.3.8
- Remove freetype-autohinter-ligature.patch
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.20 -r1.21
--- .cvsignore 14 Aug 2008 15:41:06 - 1.20
+++ .cvsignore 15 Jan 2009 19:06:17 - 1.21
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-freetype-2.3.7.tar.bz2
-freetype-doc-2.3.7.tar.bz2
-ft2demos-2.3.7.tar.bz2
+freetype-2.3.8.tar.bz2
+freetype-doc-2.3.8.tar.bz2
+ft2demos-2.3.8.tar.bz2
Index: freetype.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/freetype.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.66
retrieving revision 1.67
diff -u -r1.66 -r1.67
--- freetype.spec 9 Dec 2008 21:04:45 - 1.66
+++ freetype.spec 15 Jan 2009 19:06:17 - 1.67
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@
Summary: A free and portable font rendering engine
Name: freetype
-Version: 2.3.7
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Version: 2.3.8
+Release: 1%{?dist}
License: FTL or GPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
URL: http://www.freetype.org
@@ -33,9 +33,6 @@
# Fix crash https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6841
Patch89: freetype-2.2.1-memcpy-fix.patch
-# Upstream patches
-Patch101: freetype-autohinter-ligature.patch
-
Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires: libX11-devel
@@ -96,8 +93,6 @@
%patch88 -p1 -b .multilib
%patch89 -p1 -b .memcpy
-%patch101 -p0 -b .autohinter-ligature
-
%build
%configure --disable-static
@@ -224,6 +219,10 @@
%doc docs/tutorial
%changelog
+* Thu Jan 15 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2.3.8-1
+- Update to 2.3.8
+- Remove freetype-autohinter-ligature.patch
+
* Tue Dec 09 2008 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2.3.7-3
- Add full source URL to Source lines.
- Add docs to main and devel package.
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/freetype/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -r1.20 -r1.21
--- sources 14 Aug 2008 15:41:06 - 1.20
+++ sources 15 Jan 2009 19:06:17 - 1.21
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-83306194817ebdea554133b4232a34aa freetype-2.3.7.tar.bz2
-2ba135e6a126ed86e9b462167511ced8 freetype-doc-2.3.7.tar.bz2
-cf2cc0d0d4788548556c360c25fbe011 ft2demos-2.3.7.tar.bz2
+6cf31a08826715a0d16ae366da9c7d3b freetype-2.3.8.tar.bz2
+de1cc7cf098e11fba5898efdab1bc23d freetype-doc-2.3.8.tar.bz2
+6582649a8b877ec8d9893a9d834f7ab6 ft2demos-2.3.8.tar.bz2
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477457, which changed state. Bug 477457 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477457 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477457] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477457 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-15 14:18:21 EDT --- This packages has been updated in rawhide. It now generates: silkscreen-fonts-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm silkscreen-fonts-1.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm silkscreen-fonts-common-1.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm silkscreen-expanded-fonts-1.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm (there are two font families: Silkscreen and Silkscreen Expanded) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 162370] Print the table!
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370 gucharmap | general | Ver: 1.4.x Roozbeh Pournader changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luis.vi...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Roozbeh Pournader 2009-01-15 20:00 UTC --- Behdad, IANAL, but this is not an idea. The idea part of this is presenting characters in a chart, which everyone is entitled to. But copyright protects the presentation part of what Unicode has done. Random quote from Wikipedia: Copyright does not cover ideas and information themselves, only the form or manner in which they are expressed. So, if we want to print Unicode character charts with 16 rows and a hex digit on each row and the rest of the character code at top of each column, write the character code under each glyph, and gray-out the area for not-yet-encoded characters, that may be illegal copying. What I suggest is, if we really want to print character charts (as opposed to what Nicolas suggested in bug 561908), we should redesign it. Otherwise, our work could be considered unlicensed derivative work. Still, since GNOME is a member of Unicode, we probably don't want to get on their nerves. We can ask them officially, if you do not object. CC-ing Luis, asking for insight and advice. -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - General-purpose fonts released by Google as part of Android
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-15 15:26:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel tiresias-fonts-info-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 tiresias-fonts-info-z-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 tiresias-fonts-key-v2-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 tiresias-fonts-lp-fontconfig.
Author: spot
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11081
Modified Files:
tiresias-fonts.spec
Added Files:
tiresias-fonts-info-fontconfig.conf
tiresias-fonts-info-z-fontconfig.conf
tiresias-fonts-key-v2-fontconfig.conf
tiresias-fonts-lp-fontconfig.conf
tiresias-fonts-pc-fontconfig.conf
tiresias-fonts-pc-z-fontconfig.conf
tiresias-fonts-sign-fontconfig.conf
tiresias-fonts-sign-z-fontconfig.conf
Log Message:
convert package to new guidelines
--- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-info-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familyInfofont/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyInfofont/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
alias binding=same
familyInfofont Z/family
accept
familyInfofont/family
/accept
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-info-z-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familyInfofont Z/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyInfofont Z/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
alias binding=same
familyInfofont/family
accept
familyInfofont Z/family
/accept
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-key-v2-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familyKeyfont V2/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyKeyfont V2/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-lp-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familyserif/family
prefer
familyLPfont/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyLPfont/family
default
familyserif/family
/default
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-pc-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familyPCfont/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyPCfont/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
alias binding=same
familyPCfont Z/family
accept
familyPCfont/family
/accept
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-pc-z-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familyPCfont Z/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyPCfont Z/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
alias binding=same
familyPCfont/family
accept
familyPCfont Z/family
/accept
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-sign-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familySignfont/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familySignfont/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
alias binding=same
familySignfont Z/family
accept
familySignfont/family
/accept
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE tiresias-fonts-sign-z-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familySignfont Z/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familySignfont Z/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
alias binding=same
familySignfont/family
accept
familySignfont Z/family
/accept
/alias
/fontconfig
Index: tiresias-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/tiresias-fonts/devel/tiresias-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- tiresias-fonts.spec 7 Jan 2008 22:39:39 - 1.1
+++ tiresias-fonts.spec 15 Jan 2009 20:36:45 - 1.2
@@ -1,11 +1,17 @@
%define fontname tiresias
-%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
-%define fontconfdir %{_sysconfdir}/fonts/conf.d
+%define fontconf 60-%{fontname}.conf
+
+%define common_desc \
+The Tiresias family of fonts has been designed for use in multiple
environments \
+to help improve legibility, especially for individuals with visual impairment.
\
+It includes specialized fonts for information labels, control labels (for key \
+tops), large print publications, computer systems, television subtitling, and \
+signs.
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Summary: Low vision fonts
Version: 1.0
-Release: 2%{?dist}
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477468, which changed state. Bug 477468 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477468] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-15 15:39:03 EDT --- Okay, I migrated this one over. It now writes out: tiresias-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.src.rpm tiresias-fonts-common-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-info-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-info-z-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-key-v2-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-lp-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-pc-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-pc-z-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-sign-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm tiresias-sign-z-fonts-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm The font families are: Infofont, Infofont Z, Keyfont V2, LPfont, PCfont, PCfont Z, Signfont, Signfont Z -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontpackages/devel .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 fontpackages.spec, 1.5, 1.6 import.log, 1.5, 1.6 sources, 1.5, 1.6
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30804/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore fontpackages.spec import.log sources
Log Message:
1.15
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- .cvsignore 15 Jan 2009 00:20:51 - 1.5
+++ .cvsignore 15 Jan 2009 22:20:48 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fontpackages-1.14.tar.bz2
+fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2
Index: fontpackages.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/fontpackages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- fontpackages.spec 15 Jan 2009 00:20:51 - 1.5
+++ fontpackages.spec 15 Jan 2009 22:20:48 - 1.6
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
%define rpmmacrodir %{_sysconfdir}/rpm/
Name:fontpackages
-Version: 1.14
+Version: 1.15
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
@@ -97,8 +97,12 @@
%changelog
+* Thu Jan 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nim at fedoraproject dot org
+- 1.15-1
+â lua-ize the main macro
+
* Wed Jan 14 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nim at fedoraproject dot org
-- 1.13-1
+- 1.14-1
â½ Update for subpackage naming changes requested by FPC
* Mon Dec 22 2008 Nicolas Mailhot nim at fedoraproject dot org
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- import.log 15 Jan 2009 00:20:51 - 1.5
+++ import.log 15 Jan 2009 22:20:48 - 1.6
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
fontpackages-1_12-2_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.12-2.fc11.src.rpm:1229863050
fontpackages-1_13-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.13-1.fc11.src.rpm:1229949018
fontpackages-1_14-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.14-1.fc11.src.rpm:1231978787
+fontpackages-1_15-1_fc11:HEAD:fontpackages-1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm:1232058014
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontpackages/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
--- sources 15 Jan 2009 00:20:51 - 1.5
+++ sources 15 Jan 2009 22:20:48 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-a90a6bbc2937c847fb32cad0bac41726 fontpackages-1.14.tar.bz2
+69359230ae56bc40320bbe3df61f71d4 fontpackages-1.15.tar.bz2
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.92, 1.93 import.log, 1.9, 1.10
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3088/devel
Modified Files:
dejavu-fonts.spec import.log
Log Message:
update for new naming guidelines
Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.92
retrieving revision 1.93
diff -u -r1.92 -r1.93
--- dejavu-fonts.spec 21 Dec 2008 17:18:48 - 1.92
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec 15 Jan 2009 22:54:37 - 1.93
@@ -28,12 +28,12 @@
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 2.28
-Release: 1%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
Summary: DejaVu fonts
Group: User Interface/X
License: Bitstream Vera and Public Domain
-URL: http://%{fontname}.sf.net/
+URL: http://%{name}.org/
Source0:
%{?!alphatag:http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{fontname}}%{?alphatag:%{fontname}.sourceforge.net/snapshots}/%{archivename}.tar.bz2
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
BuildRequires: %{Blocks} %{UnicodeData}
BuildArch: noarch
-BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
+BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel 1.13
%description
%common_desc
@@ -57,7 +57,9 @@
Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts 2.26-3
Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental 2.26-3
-Requires: %{name}-sans, %{name}-serif, %{name}-sans-mono
+Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts
+Requires: %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts
+Requires: %{fontname}-serif-fonts
%description compat
%compat_desc
@@ -69,14 +71,16 @@
Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts 2.26-3
-Requires: %{name}-lgc-sans, %{name}-lgc-serif, %{name}-lgc-sans-mono
+Requires: %{fontname}-lgc-sans-fonts
+Requires: %{fontname}-lgc-sans-mono-fonts
+Requires: %{fontname}-lgc-serif-fonts
%description lgc-compat
%compat_desc
%package common
-Summary: Common files for Dejavu fonts (documentationâ¦)
+Summary: Common files for the Dejavu font set
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
@@ -88,7 +92,7 @@
This package consists of files used by other DejaVu packages.
-%package sans
+%package -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
Summary: Variable-width sans-serif font faces
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
@@ -96,7 +100,10 @@
Conflicts: dejavu-fonts 2.26-3
Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental 2.26-3
-%description sans
+Obsoletes: %{name}-sans 2.28-2
+Provides: %{name}-sans = %{version}-%{release}
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-sans-fonts
%common_desc
This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif variable-width font faces, in
@@ -105,7 +112,7 @@
%_font_pkg -n sans -f *-%{fontname}-sans.conf DejaVuSans.ttf DejaVuSans-*.ttf
DejaVuSansCondensed*.ttf
-%package serif
+%package -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
Summary: Variable-width serif font faces
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
@@ -113,7 +120,10 @@
Conflicts: dejavu-fonts 2.26-3
Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental 2.26-3
-%description serif
+Obsoletes: %{name}-serif 2.28-2
+Provides: %{name}-serif = %{version}-%{release}
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-serif-fonts
%common_desc
This package consists of the DejaVu serif variable-width font faces, in their
@@ -122,7 +132,7 @@
%_font_pkg -n serif -f *-%{fontname}-serif.conf DejaVuSerif.ttf
DejaVuSerif-*.ttf DejaVuSerifCondensed*.ttf
-%package sans-mono
+%package -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts
Summary: Monospace sans-serif font faces
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
@@ -130,7 +140,10 @@
Conflicts: dejavu-fonts 2.26-3
Conflicts: dejavu-fonts-experimental 2.26-3
-%description sans-mono
+Obsoletes: %{name}-sans-mono 2.28-2
+Provides: %{name}-sans-mono = %{version}-%{release}
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts
%common_desc
This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif monospace font faces, in their
@@ -139,14 +152,16 @@
%_font_pkg -n sans-mono -f *-%{fontname}-sans-mono.conf DejaVuSansMono*.ttf
-%package lgc-sans
+%package -n %{fontname}-lgc-sans-fonts
Summary: Variable-width sans-serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
Conflicts: dejavu-lgc-fonts 2.26-3
-%description lgc-sans
+Obsoletes: %{name}-lgc-sans 2.28-2
+
+%description -n %{fontname}-lgc-sans-fonts
%common_desc
This package consists of the DejaVu sans-serif variable-width font faces, with
@@ -155,14 +170,16 @@
%_font_pkg -n lgc-sans -f *-%{fontname}-lgc-sans.conf DejaVuLGCSans.ttf
DejaVuLGCSans-*.ttf DejaVuLGCSansCondensed*.ttf
-%package lgc-serif
+%package -n %{fontname}-lgc-serif-fonts
Summary: Variable-width serif font faces, Latin-Greek-Cyrillic subset
Group:User Interface/X
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
Conflicts: dejavu-lgc-fonts 2.26-3
-%description lgc-serif
+Obsoletes:
[Bug 162370] Print the table!
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370 gucharmap | general | Ver: 1.4.x --- Comment #8 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-01-16 00:59 UTC --- For the record, IANAL. -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162370. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf, NONE, 1.1 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf, NONE, 1.1 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf, NONE, 1.1 65-baekmuk-ttf-hline.conf, NONE, 1.1 baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
Author: cchance
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29418
Modified Files:
baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
Added Files:
65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf
65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf 65-baekmuk-ttf-hline.conf
Log Message:
* Fri Jan 16 2009 Caius Chance ccha...@redhat.com - 2.2-11.fc11
- Resolves: rhbz#477332 (Include macro _font_pkg and created fontconfig .conf
files.)
--- NEW FILE 65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf ---
?xml version=1.0?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM fonts.dtd
fontconfig
!--
Serif faces
--
alias
familyBaekmuk Batang/family
default
familyserif/family
/default
/alias
alias
familyserif/family
prefer
familyBaekmuk Batang/family
/prefer
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE 65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf ---
?xml version=1.0?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM fonts.dtd
fontconfig
!--
Sans-serif faces
--
alias
familyBaekmuk Dotum/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familyBaekmuk Dotum/family
/prefer
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE 65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf ---
?xml version=1.0?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM fonts.dtd
fontconfig
!--
monospace faces
--
alias
familyBaekmuk Gulim/family
default
familymonospace/family
/default
/alias
alias
familymonospace/family
prefer
familyBaekmuk Gulim/family
/prefer
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE 65-baekmuk-ttf-hline.conf ---
?xml version=1.0?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM fonts.dtd
fontconfig
!--
this conf file is intended empty
--
/fontconfig
Index: baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/baekmuk-ttf-fonts/devel/baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 9 Jan 2009 00:05:40 - 1.6
+++ baekmuk-ttf-fonts.spec 16 Jan 2009 02:42:55 - 1.7
@@ -1,24 +1,27 @@
%define fontnamebaekmuk-ttf
-%define fontconf65-%{fontname}
-%define archivename %{name}-%{version}
+%define archivename %{fontname}-%{version}
%define common_desc \
This package provides the free Korean TrueType fonts.
-%define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
-%define cidmapdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d
+%define fontdir%{_datadir}/fonts/%{fontname}
+%define gsdir %{_datadir}/ghostscript/conf.d
%define catalogue %{_sysconfdir}/X11/fontpath.d
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version:2.2
-Release:10%{?dist}
+Release:11%{?dist}
Summary:Free Korean TrueType fonts
Group: User Interface/X
License:Baekmuk
URL:http://kldp.net/projects/baekmuk/
-Source0:
http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/1429/%{fontname}-%{version}.tar.gz
+Source0:http://kldp.net/frs/download.php/1429/%{archivename}.tar.gz
Source1:FAPIcidfmap.ko
Source2:cidfmap.ko
+Source3:65-baekmuk-ttf-batang.conf
+Source4:65-baekmuk-ttf-dotum.conf
+Source5:65-baekmuk-ttf-gulim.conf
+Source6:65-baekmuk-ttf-hline.conf
Obsoletes: fonts-korean
@@ -41,80 +44,133 @@
This package contains some common files for Baekmuk Korean TrueType fonts.
-%define mk_pkg()\
-%package %1\
-Summary:Korean Baekmuk TrueType %2 typeface\
-License:Baekmuk\
-Group: User Interface/X\
-Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko 1.0.11-33 fonts-korean 2.2-6\
-Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common\
-\
-%description %1\
-%common_desc\
-\
-This package contains the Korean TrueType font %2 typeface.\
-\
-%post %1\
-if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then\
- %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts\
-fi\
-\
-%postun %1\
-if [ $1 = 0 ]; then\
- if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then\
-%{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts\
- fi\
-fi\
-\
-%files %1\
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)\
-%dir %{fontdir}-%1\
-%{fontdir}-%1/*.ttf\
-%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}-%1/fonts.dir\
-%verify(not md5 size mtime) %{fontdir}-%1/fonts.scale\
-%{catalogue}/%{name}-%1
-
-%mk_pkg batang Batang
-%mk_pkg dotum Dotum
-%mk_pkg gulim Gulim
-%mk_pkg hline Headline
+%package batang
+Summary:Korean Baekmuk TrueType Batang typeface
+License:Baekmuk
+Group: User Interface/X
+Obsoletes: ttfonts-ko 1.0.11-33 fonts-korean 2.2-6
+Requires: fontpackages-filesystem, %{name}-common
+
+%description batang
+%common_desc
+
+This package contains the Korean TrueType font Batang typeface.
+
[Bug 462038] Hotkeys has no response and Go To window couldn't be inputted.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462038 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-16 00:19:19 EDT --- Yeah, the one in rawhide was built with pango/cairo/spiro support. That support was not available (Or didn't work) when the f10 fontforge was built, so that explains a lot of them. Not sure why libuninameslist isn't in there. :( thats odd. Can you see any ill effect from it? That might be one more reason to try and update f10's fontforge... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontconfig/devel fontconfig.spec, 1.111, 1.112 fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch, 1.1, NONE
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19537
Modified Files:
fontconfig.spec
Removed Files:
fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch
Log Message:
* Fri Jan 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com -
2.6.90-2.git.63.g6bb4b9a
- Update to 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a
- Remove upstreamed patch
Index: fontconfig.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel/fontconfig.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.111
retrieving revision 1.112
diff -u -r1.111 -r1.112
--- fontconfig.spec 16 Jan 2009 05:46:20 - 1.111
+++ fontconfig.spec 16 Jan 2009 05:53:21 - 1.112
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Summary: Font configuration and customization library
Name: fontconfig
Version: 2.6.90
-Release: 1.git.63.g6bb4b9a%{?dist}
+Release: 2.git.63.g6bb4b9a%{?dist}
License: MIT
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://fontconfig.org/release/fontconfig-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -23,8 +23,6 @@
# reference the new path in %%configure
Conflicts: fonts-xorg-base, fonts-xorg-syriac
-Patch0: fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch
-
%description
Fontconfig is designed to locate fonts within the
system and select them according to requirements specified by
@@ -46,7 +44,6 @@
%prep
%setup -q
-%patch0 -p0 -b .indic
%build
@@ -132,8 +129,9 @@
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
-* Fri Jan 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com -
2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a
+* Fri Jan 16 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com -
2.6.90-2.git.63.g6bb4b9a
- Update to 2.6.90-1.git.63.g6bb4b9a
+- Remove upstreamed patch
* Mon Oct 20 2008 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 2.6.0-3
- Add fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch
--- fontconfig-2.6.0-indic.patch DELETED ---
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
