[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 2 09:59:34 + 2009 --- Looks good for 3.2... unless other high priorities like the Mac-Port, DrawingLayer rework, BiDi+CTL issues, Vista issues, bad but subtle regressions introduced by fontconfig- and cairo-integration, I18N issues etc. get in the way again... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from soft...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 2 10:41:22 + 2009 --- Big hads hdu ;-) This sounds really good. This issue is too old in order to further postpone it. Many, many, many thank in advance, Wolfgang - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477473] [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 Tomas Smetana tsmet...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Tomas Smetana tsmet...@redhat.com 2009-03-02 08:45:47 EDT --- Switched to liberation-fonts for the tvtime GUI as the lesser evil of all the choices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477473, which changed state. Bug 477473 Summary: [tvtime] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 seth vidal svi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||svi...@redhat.com Flag||needinfo?(br...@wolff.to) --- Comment #3 from seth vidal svi...@redhat.com 2009-03-02 09:44:31 EDT --- can you show all the versions of: python sqlite python-sqlite yum rpm installed on your system? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(br...@wolff.to) | --- Comment #4 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2009-03-02 10:59:17 EDT --- I have updated some stuff since then and am not sure the current versions are the same as the ones I was using then. (They might be though as I have had several attempts at finishing the updates after the mass rebuild thwarted by file conflicts.) python-2.6-4.fc11.x86_64 yum-3.2.21-11.fc11.noarch rpm-4.6.0-11.fc11.x86_64 sqlite-3.6.10-3.fc11.i386 sqlite-3.6.10-3.fc11.x86_64 package python-sqlite is not installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #5 from Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to 2009-03-02 11:05:32 EDT --- After looking around I think maybe you meant to ask about python-sqlite2-2.3.3-5.fc11.x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #6 from James Antill james.ant...@redhat.com 2009-03-02 11:07:30 EDT --- I upgraded yum and rpm first ... but I had no problem upgrading the fonts as part of a mass update, or on their own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 James Antill james.ant...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hcme...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from James Antill james.ant...@redhat.com 2009-03-02 11:07:53 EDT --- *** Bug 488058 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #9 from seth vidal svi...@redhat.com 2009-03-02 12:28:36 EDT --- unclear. Nicholas, I can replicate this - but it is ONLY on the upgrade from -6 to -7 of apanov-edrip-fonts. I'll try to track it back to see where the problem is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-02 13:10:11 EDT --- -6 and -7 are the only edrip versions built with an rpm that includes font autoprovides magic (as I noted in comment #1). Edrip and Heuristica are also currently our only fonts where upstream uses non-ascii font metadata. I suppose both of those trigger a yum bug Panu didn't notice when he did his coding (rpm itself seems fine) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #11 from seth vidal svi...@redhat.com 2009-03-02 13:28:32 EDT --- okay, a little more debugging. So the font provides being generated. One of them appears to be a unicode string. However, when I get it back from rpm-python from the hdr object it is being reported as a string object - is there something I'm missing in between? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fontforge/devel sources, 1.24, 1.25 .cvsignore, 1.24, 1.25 fontforge.spec, 1.42, 1.43
Author: kevin
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25954
Modified Files:
sources .cvsignore fontforge.spec
Log Message:
Upgrade to 20090224
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -r1.24 -r1.25
--- sources 21 Feb 2009 00:47:37 - 1.24
+++ sources 2 Mar 2009 19:57:21 - 1.25
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-eb00467bff69b15a4137595c16cdbff5 fontforge_full-20081224.tar.bz2
-476b047dc6cdc36d79ac34da1c3fcb58 fontforge_htdocs-20081224.tar.bz2
+5b564437e5e3db660b0202647b6f733b fontforge_full-20090224.tar.bz2
+fdd4420934fe12575e7240642c0ffbe4 fontforge_htdocs-20090224.tar.bz2
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -r1.24 -r1.25
--- .cvsignore 21 Feb 2009 00:47:37 - 1.24
+++ .cvsignore 2 Mar 2009 19:57:21 - 1.25
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-fontforge_full-20081224.tar.bz2
-fontforge_htdocs-20081224.tar.bz2
+fontforge_full-20090224.tar.bz2
+fontforge_htdocs-20090224.tar.bz2
Index: fontforge.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/fontforge/devel/fontforge.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -r1.42 -r1.43
--- fontforge.spec 24 Feb 2009 17:48:41 - 1.42
+++ fontforge.spec 2 Mar 2009 19:57:21 - 1.43
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1))}
-%global docs_version 20081224
+%global docs_version 20090224
%global gettext_package FontForge
Name: fontforge
-Version:20081224
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:20090224
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Outline and bitmap font editor
Group: Applications/Publishing
@@ -142,6 +142,9 @@
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc
%changelog
+* Thu Feb 26 2009 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com - 20090224-1
+- Upgrade to 20090224
+
* Tue Feb 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 20081224-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477401] [inconsolata-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401 Bug 477401 depends on bug 486269, which changed state. Bug 486269 Summary: Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 486269] Review Request: levien-inconsolata-fonts - Inconsolata fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486269 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-02 16:52:02 EDT --- Built in rawhide and old package marked dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487593] crash changing language in gdm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487593 --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-03-02 17:01:40 EDT --- Will hit rawhide tonight or tomorrow. commit 14fe6f79c37d83863e8fcc092b42233db3ad9760 Author: Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org Date: Tue Mar 3 01:30:03 2009 +0330 [pangofc-fontmap] Don't unref NULL object (RH bug# 487593) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh
||at.com
Depends on||212079
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
Flag||fedora-review?,
||needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net
||)
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-02
17:18:04 EDT ---
Thank you very much for working on this. Here is a first review pass:
1. FPC and FESCO have decided %global was preferred over %define. The changes
are in fontpackages 1.20, please apply them
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define
2. Please try to keep the same declaration order as the templates, that makes
diffing reviewing easier
3. Please do not make a metapackage of the main package, if you need a
metapackage for upgrade paths create a -compat subpackage that we'll be able to
kill at F12 time
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Can.27t_I_use_my_old_package_name_instead_of_a_-compat_subpackage.3F
vera, mgopen, dejavu, liberation, etc all use this proven pattern
4. you can probably drop the
Obsoletes: freefont-ttf %{version}-%{release}
freefont has been named freefont in Fedora for quite a long time
5. In rawhide you can drop the
Group:User Interface/X
declarations in subpackages
6. use the
%package -n %{fontname}-FAMILY-fonts
%description -n %{fontname}-FAMILY-fonts
%_font_pkg -n FAMILY -f %{fontconf}-FAMILY.conf NAME*.ttf
which is documented in the templates if you want stuff to actually work
7. put doc in the common package, that's one of its main uses
8. BuildRequire fontforge
9. You'll likely hit
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-February/msg00076.html
too
10. Please add fontconfig rules to each font subpackages. In your case that's
probably just taking the
/usr/share/fontconfig/templates/basic-font-template.conf
template and filling in font names
11. Please also make sure you've not forgotten a step in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages#Source_package_naming_changes
That's all I see right now, I may have missed something else, multi-font
packages can be trickier than mono-font ones. But first fix this please
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 --- Comment #13 from seth vidal svi...@redhat.com 2009-03-02 17:21:38 EDT --- okay, I've been mucking with this for a good portion of the day. There are two problems here: 1. it looks like rpm is generating an encoded string as a provide 2. rpm-python appears to be claiming it is a string object Additionally the provides generated by the fontprov script are; config(apanov-edrip-fonts) = 20081007-7.fc11 font(:lang=ava) font(:lang=be) font(:lang=bg) font(:lang=ce) font(:lang=fj) font(:lang=ho) font(:lang=ia) font(:lang=ie) font(:lang=ik) font(:lang=io) font(:lang=kum) font(:lang=kv) font(:lang=lez) font(:lang=mn-mn) font(:lang=ms) font(:lang=nr) font(:lang=om) font(:lang=os) font(:lang=ru) font(:lang=rw) font(:lang=sel) font(:lang=sh) font(:lang=so) font(:lang=sr) font(:lang=ss) font(:lang=st) font(:lang=sw) font(:lang=ts) font(:lang=uk) font(:lang=xh) font(:lang=zu) font(edrip) font(едрип) apanov-edrip-fonts = 20081007-7.fc11 Do we really want an '=' in the name section of a provide? I kinda hope we do not. I think the provides script needs some love and I think we need to figure out what rpm-python is doing with the objects it is getting. Panu, Florian, Jindrich comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487912] Unable to upgrade to 20081007-7.fc11, but fresh install worked
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487912 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||besfa...@redhat.com, ||rich...@hughsie.com --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-02 17:55:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) okay, I've been mucking with this for a good portion of the day. There are two problems here: 1. it looks like rpm is generating an encoded string as a provide Since the autoprovides stuff extracts metadata from the font files, and I don't think any font format spec mandates this metadata must be ASCII only, this is pretty much required to work with font files. 2. rpm-python appears to be claiming it is a string object This is probably the bug Additionally the provides generated by the fontprov script are; config(apanov-edrip-fonts) = 20081007-7.fc11 font(:lang=ava) ... font(edrip) font(едрип) This font file declares two names, one ASCII and the other — not. This is an upstream choice. Each of the names can be referenced in a digital document, wo we can't really drop it if we want autoinstall to work. apanov-edrip-fonts = 20081007-7.fc11 Do we really want an '=' in the name section of a provide? I kinda hope we do not. Behdad really liked this syntax, it's very close to the kind of options every fontconfig command knows how to process. Since it was properly enclosed in a font() namespace Panu and Richard let it be. I think the provides script needs some love It's not a script it's a binary that was coded for packaging systems such as rpm/pk The problem I have with that any syntax change requires a rebuild of all the packages providing fonts before the next release (including beasts like OO.o) and I'd really like not to do one every other week. and I think we need to figure out what rpm-python is doing with the objects it is getting. Panu, Florian, Jindrich comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477387] [fonts-hebrew-fancy] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||487913 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 487913] Review Request: culmus-fancy-fonts - Fancy fonts for Hebrew
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487913
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh
||at.com
Blocks||477387
Depends on||173897
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
Flag||fedora-review?,
||needinfo?(dan...@cs.technio
||n.ac.il)
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-02
18:43:20 EDT ---
First review pass (builds in mock, good)
1. various rpmlint warnings, of which only the following need to be fixed
culmus-fancy-fonts.src: E: invalid-spec-name
culmus-fancy-fonts.src:84: E: files-attr-not-set
A file or a directory entry in a %files section does not have attributes set
which may result in security issues in the resulting binary package depending
on the system where the package is built. Add default attributes using
%defattr before it in the %files section, or use per line %attr's.
culmus-fancy-fonts.src:157: W: setup-not-quiet
Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from
unpacking the sources.
culmus-fancy-fonts.src:158: W: setup-not-quiet
Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from
unpacking the sources.
culmus-fancy-fonts.src:159: W: setup-not-quiet
Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from
unpacking the sources.
culmus-fancy-fonts.src:160: W: setup-not-quiet
Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from
unpacking the sources.
culmus-fancy-fonts.src:161: W: setup-not-quiet
Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from
unpacking the sources.
culmus-fancy-fonts.src:162: W: setup-not-quiet
Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from
unpacking the sources.
culmus-fancy-fonts.src:163: W: setup-not-quiet
Use the -q option to the %setup macro to avoid useless build output from
unpacking the sources.
culmus-fancy-fonts.src: W: no-%build-section
The spec file does not contain a %build section. Even if some packages don't
directly need it, section markers may be overridden in rpm's configuration to
provide additional under the hood functionality, such as injection of
automatic -debuginfo subpackages. Add the section, even if empty.
fonts-hebrew-fancy-compat.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot Compatibility files
of Culmus fancy font families.
Summary ends with a dot.
2. please use OTF over Type1 whenever possible
3.
a. we prefer for fonts released in different archives to be packaged
separately (different rpms and srpms).
b. also, I don't think Legal would appreciate the way you drop every licensing
file but one.
c. lastly, the different fonts actually have different timestamps so your
version is misleading
However there is a tolerance for fonts that used to be packaged in a single
srpm so you may avail yourself of it if you really want to. Still, I don't
think that's a good idea. 7 simple packages can be easier to manage than a
monster one (and are actually quicker to review)
4. It would be a good idea to contact upstream and make it add the FSF font
exception to their licensing
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts#Good_font_licenses_allow_embedding
5. the rpm in rawhide allows you to drop the duplicate Group declarations in
subpackages
6. FPC and FESCO have decided %define-s should be replaced by %global-s (cf
fontpackages-devel 1.20)
7. You do not need this
Obsoletes: %{fontname}-fonts-common %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{fontname}-comix-no2-fonts %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{fontname}-dorian-fonts %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{fontname}-gan-fonts %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{fontname}-gladia-fonts %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{fontname}-ktav-yad-fonts %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{fontname}-ozrad-fonts %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{fontname}-anka-fonts %{version}-%{release}
8. You should not need this
Provides: fonts-hebrew-fancy = %{version}-%{release}
9. Please only obsolete the last version of fonts-hebrew-fancy built in koji +
1
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages
10. Your compat subpackage need not require common, it'll be pulled in by the
others
11. You're supposed to add something
[Bug 477466] [thibault-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466 Lyos Gemini Norezel lyos.gemininore...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lyos Gemini Norezel lyos.gemininore...@gmail.com 2009-03-02 23:58:51 EDT --- Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477466, which changed state. Bug 477466 Summary: [thibault-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477466 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477334] [darkgarden-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 Lyos Gemini Norezel lyos.gemininore...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lyos Gemini Norezel lyos.gemininore...@gmail.com 2009-03-03 00:22:26 EDT --- Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477334, which changed state. Bug 477334 Summary: [darkgarden-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_DEV |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477447] [python-tgcaptcha] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447 --- Comment #8 from Felix Schwarz felix.schw...@oss.schwarz.eu 2009-03-03 02:31:57 EDT --- I started working on that. Found some smaller problems which I try to resolve: * tuffy rpm did not built for me on F11 as well. fontforge complained about $argc in the while loop - probably some escaping issue. I worked around this by extracting the fontforge script for now. * The /usr/share path for tuffy in tgcaptcha is wrong because it's now tulrich-tuffy * We need to delete to ttf files from the tgcaptcha tar.gz before building, otherwise they will be still included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
