[Bug 394103] All elements are HUGE (when doing dpi autodetect?)
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394103 --- Comment #92 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) r...@ocallahan.org 2009-05-05 23:38:29 PDT --- Please file a new bug for Windows. This patch was fixed as originally reported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #338816|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #338817|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #10 from Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-05-06 03:50:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342605) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342605) new log, showing finding font files successful After http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=100858 , it now works correctly on f10. There seems to be a new harmless message compared to previous: Can't find (or can't open) font file /usr/share/ghostscript/8.64/Resource/Font/NimbusSanL-Regu. Can't find (or can't open) font file NimbusSanL-Regu. Querying operating system for font files... Loading NimbusSanL-Regu font from /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n019003l.pfb... 3652904 2149080 21225716 19825545 3 done. So please close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 499345] New: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: kxi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In rhel 5.3,in gedit input U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 with RAW CODE,the font has error Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386 pango-debuginfo-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64 pango-devel-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64 pango-debuginfo-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386 pango-devel-1.14.9-5.el5_3.i386 pango-1.14.9-5.el5_3.x86_64 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit and input U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 with scim-bridge-RAW CODE 2.The font is different from http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTestCaseGSUB-Kannada.html 205 3.All other fonts from U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95to U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0CB9 all have errors compared with http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTestCaseGSUB-Kannada.html from 205 to 238. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: I will attach the result created in gedit. Please compare them with http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTestCaseGSUB-Kannada.html from 205 to 238. They are different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 06:21:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342626) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342626) kn_IN error of 205-238 in gedit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 499349] New: Backspace has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Backspace has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499349 Summary: Backspace has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: xin...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Backspace has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint.You should press it twice to delete the word. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open a gedit and select the RAW CODE in scim-bridge. 2.Input 09CB, 09CC,09DC,09DD,09DF in gedit. 3.Press Backspace to delete each word (Make sure the cursor should be at the right of the each word). Actual results: Each word should be deleted totally when you press Backspace once. Expected results: Each word isn't deleted when you press Backspace once,you should press the Backspace again to delete it totally. Additional info: You can get the more information by accessing http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/as_IN/font/IndicFontTestCaseCodepoint-Assamese.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 499349] Backspace has wrong function in Assamese Codepoint.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499349 --- Comment #1 from XinSun xin...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 06:28:51 EDT --- The version of pango : pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 --- Comment #2 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 06:38:27 EDT --- the Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable) on f10 i386 should be pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 please ignore the el5 component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #12 from Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-05-06 06:46:56 EDT --- I have already tried fc-cache -f and also manually blowing away fontconfig's cache everywhere... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 499357] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499357 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 06:45:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342628) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342628) the correct font image -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 488398] ghostscript files referred to outdated font info
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488398 --- Comment #11 from Hin-Tak Leung ht...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-05-06 06:46:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342629) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342629) font encoding(?) problem The new font files seem to have some font encoding problem with X? Anyway, here is firefox screenshot, plus url. configuring firefox to use Sazanami Gothic (a japanese font) for tradtional chinese explicitly shows how the page should look for most parts - obviously using a japanese font (with missing code points) is not ideal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 499357] New: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499357 Summary: [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 has error Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: kxi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 with RAW CODE,the font has error Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open gedit and input U+0CA4 U+0CCD U+0CB0 with scim-bridge-RAW CODE 2.The font ತ್ರ is different from http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/kn_IN/font/IndicFontTestCaseGSUB-Kannada.html 61 Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: I will attach the correct font snapshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 499360] New: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499360 Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E3 has error. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: xin...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Input 09E3 with RAW CODE in gedit, the result has error. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select RAW CODE in scim-bridge. 2.Input 09E3 in gedit. Actual results: The result is ৢ and is different from the URL http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/as_IN/font/image/09E3.jpg Expected results: The result is same with the URL http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/as_IN/font/image/09E3.jpg Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 499358] New: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499358 Summary: [as_IN] [Codepoint- Additional Vowels] U+09E2 has error. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: xin...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: Input 09E2 with RAW CODE in gedit, the word has error. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select RAW CODE in scim-bridge. 2.Input 09E2 in gedit. Actual results: The result is ৢ and is different from the URL http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/as_IN/font/image/09E2.jpg Expected results: The word is same with the URL http://batman.bne.redhat.com/~indic/IndicTC/lang/as_IN/font/image/09E2.jpg Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||20030323-1.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|20030323-1.fc10 |20030323-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(besfa...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #35 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 19:39:00 EDT --- Yep, that's it. Very ugly. I suggest patching Qt and filing a bug upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #37 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 20:07:02 EDT --- pa-in is fine. I'll think about this later and see if renaming it back in fontconfig makes sense. Here's the bug that introduced the change: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19890 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #38 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 20:29:13 EDT --- So pa_IN.orth should be renamed to pa-in.orth? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #39 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 20:35:34 EDT --- No. Either Qt patched to use pa-in instead of pa, or pa-in.orth renamed back to pa.orth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #40 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-06 20:43:28 EDT --- Maybe renaming it back in fontconfig is the best solution? This is a compatibility issue, and while I can easily patch our Qt, it won't help for third-party stuff statically linked against upstream Qt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 499345] [kn_IN][Pango] GSUB U+0CB0 U+200D U+0CCD U+0C95 font has error.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499345 --- Comment #3 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 21:55:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342755) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342755) correct font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #41 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-06 21:59:37 EDT --- FYI, Qt 3 appears not affected, no hardcoded languages there: http://websvn.kde.org/branches/qt/3.3/qt-copy/src/kernel/qfontdatabase_x11.cpp?revision=763238view=markup But that's not surprising, as Qt 3 doesn't properly support Indic and other hard-to-render languages at all. So this is only about Qt 4. (But most of the Qt stuff nowadays is Qt 4, of course.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #42 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 23:27:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) No. Either Qt patched to use pa-in instead of pa, or pa-in.orth renamed back to pa.orth. I see its pa_in.ort in fontconfig. Correct me if I am wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #43 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-05-06 23:34:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) (In reply to comment #39) No. Either Qt patched to use pa-in instead of pa, or pa-in.orth renamed back to pa.orth. I see its pa_in.ort in fontconfig. Correct me if I am wrong. sorry should be read as pa_in.orth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #44 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-07 00:04:13 EDT --- Patched qt here (4.5.0-15.fc11): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=101155 Should we get this tagged into dist-f11 (if it's not too late yet)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #47 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-07 00:23:37 EDT --- I submitted a qt-4.5.1-3.fc11.1 build too: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1340046 (still running). Most likely we'll also want to sync the changes from Rawhide, but at this point I wanted to get a build with what's currently in F-11 CVS first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #48 from A S Alam aa...@redhat.com 2009-05-07 00:54:45 EDT --- Bug fixed with 4.5.0-15.fc11 package. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #49 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-07 01:22:34 EDT --- Tag request for qt-4.5.0-15.fc11 here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1754 So, should we treat this as fixed or is a fontconfig change (back to pa.orth) still being considered? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #50 from A S Alam aa...@redhat.com 2009-05-07 01:29:59 EDT --- fontconfig (which is build by than) need to rollback. I used rawhide fontconfig (fontconfig-2.6.99.behdada.20090318-1.fc11) then only this build package (qt-4.5.0-15.fc11) was working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 --- Comment #52 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-07 01:47:27 EDT --- Re comment #50: I'm not sure I understand you. Do you mean that the patched Qt will NOT work with a fontconfig which uses pa.orth? (I need to know this because it means I have to conditionally apply the patch only on F11 and above.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 497984] [qt] [pa_IN] Lohit Punjabi font showing empty square boxes in kde whereas same font works fine in gnome
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497984 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fontconfig |qt AssignedTo|besfa...@redhat.com |t...@redhat.com --- Comment #51 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-05-07 01:44:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #46) You can use rpm -Uvh --oldpackage to downgrade. I could also build a new 4.5.1-based build, but 4.5.0-15.fc11 is the most likely candidate to make it into dist-f11. Thanks. That worked. Tested successfully fix for this bug using qt-4.5.0-15.fc11 and fontconfig-2.6.99.behdada.20090318-1.fc11 (In reply to comment #49) Tag request for qt-4.5.0-15.fc11 here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1754 So, should we treat this as fixed or is a fontconfig change (back to pa.orth) still being considered? Fixed in qt. no change needed to fontconfig for now. Thanks for tag request. Added comment there for tagging F11-final. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
