[Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||sshed...@redhat.com Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 sandeep shedmake sshed...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||sshed...@redhat.com Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545004] Review Request: wqy-microhei-fonts - compact Chinese font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545004 --- Comment #1 from Qianqian Fang fan...@gmail.com 2009-12-08 09:33:36 EDT --- the spec file looks fine. Only two comments: 1. in the description, you may want to say Compact Chinese/CJK font derived from Droid font family, as it contains the Latin glyphs (with hinting/kerning) from Droid Sans and Droid Sans Mono. 2. You may want to add the AUTHORS.txt file to the %doc record. I plan to add a fontconfig file in the next release. I guess when that comes, you just define a new fontconf variable and adjust SOURCE1 accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-12-08 16:17:24 EDT --- Adding fedora-fonts-bugs-list in CC so it registers on the Fonts SIG review list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-12-08 17:13:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377027) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377027) repo-font-audit report for this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net Flag||fedora-review?, ||needinfo?(musur...@gmail.co ||m) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-12-08 17:11:27 EDT --- Sorry for taking so long to review, I monitor fedora-fonts-bugs-list but only check for wild font package submissions when I have some free time. Anyway, review : 1. (comment) The font could probably be classified as cursive, but then the boundary between fantasy handwriting and realistic handwriting is a bit fuzzy See /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-generics.txt 2. (comment) The fontconfig templates have been tweaked a little in fontpackages-devel, though the old templates you used will still work fine 3. (blocking) Since the font family name is Digna's Handwriting the package should be named *dignas-handwriting-fonts 4. (blocking) Since this font is distributed via the Open Font LiBrary project, the package should be named oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts 5. (non-blocking) There is no usable licensing statement in the font file, and it is not distributed with a detached .txt licensing file, so the only licensing trace is the OFL logo on OFLB. Since a web site can vanish at any time it would be nice to ask upstream to distribute the font file with a detached .txt licensing file in a zip archive (even better if the licensing info is also added to the font metadata). If upstream does not want to joining the copy of a mail where they state the font is OFL to the package as %doc would be better than nothing. 6. (non-blocking) fontlint is not happy with this font, it has some problems upstream should look at (cf attached repo-font-audit report) 7. (non-blocking) repo-font-audit detected partial lang coverage in the font, it'd be nice if upstream completed the partial languages (though, at this date, it may be difficult) 8. (non-blocking) please add a page describing this font on the wiki so it is documented with other Fedora fonts: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#1 Since you're self-packaging the font, it does not need to be very exhautive, just to provide minimal info about the font Anyway this is a very clean package and apart from the naming issues there is little to complain of, it should not be too hard to get it to approvable state -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 507292] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in rpm deps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507292 Juan P. Daza P. tcpip4...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||FutureFeature, Triaged CC||tcpip4...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 507294] [RFE] Allow wildcards/regexps in yum install/upgrade/comps...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507294 Juan P. Daza P. tcpip4...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||FutureFeature, Triaged CC||tcpip4...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545683] New: update the fontconf priority for Meera font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: update the fontconf priority for Meera font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545683 Summary: update the fontconf priority for Meera font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: smc-fonts AssignedTo: psatp...@redhat.com ReportedBy: psatp...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, psatp...@redhat.com, rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com, fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: as Meera is default font for the fedora, its priority should be 66 as per the fontconfig priority, its presently 90 else if we add any fonts in range of 66-69 fontconf priority that will become default so better to give Meera 66 priority Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): smc-fonts-04.2-2 How reproducible: everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545701] New: [kn_IN] Pango doesn't render 0c95+0ccd+0c95+0c97 combination properly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [kn_IN] Pango doesn't render 0c95+0ccd+0c95+0c97 combination properly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545701 Summary: [kn_IN] Pango doesn't render 0c95+0ccd+0c95+0c97 combination properly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: svenk...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Created an attachment (id=377107) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377107) shows the actual and correct rendering Description of problem: Pango doesn't render a particular character combination properly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.26.0-1.fc12 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Enable the Kannada support 2. Select the inscript layout from ibus menu, and type the following key combination: j+d+j+ OR Select other-rawcode from ibus menu and type the following key combination 0c95+0ccd+0c95+0c97 Actual results: ಕ್ಕಷ Expected results: As shown in the attached image Additional info: Reported upstream at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604060 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545683] [ml_IN] update the fontconf priority for Meera font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545683 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ape...@redhat.com Summary|update the fontconf |[ml_IN] update the fontconf |priority for Meera font |priority for Meera font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/smc-fonts/devel 66-smc-meera.conf, NONE, 1.1 bug-545683.patch, NONE, 1.1 smc-fonts.spec, 1.10, 1.11
Author: pravins
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13694
Modified Files:
smc-fonts.spec
Added Files:
66-smc-meera.conf bug-545683.patch
Log Message:
Wed Dec 09 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 04.2-3
- bugfix 545683
--- NEW FILE 66-smc-meera.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM fonts.dtd
fontconfig
match
test name=lang compare=contains
stringml/string
/test
test name=family
stringsans-serif/string
/test
edit name=family mode=prepend_first binding=same
stringMeera/string
/edit
/match
alias
familyMeera/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
/fontconfig
bug-545683.patch:
malayalam-fonts.conf | 12
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
--- NEW FILE bug-545683.patch ---
diff -rup malayalam-fonts-04/malayalam-fonts.conf
malayalam-fonts-04_mod/malayalam-fonts.conf
--- malayalam-fonts-04/malayalam-fonts.conf 2008-06-30 00:46:25.0
+0530
+++ malayalam-fonts-04_mod/malayalam-fonts.conf 2009-12-09 10:45:20.0
+0530
@@ -7,18 +7,6 @@
stringml/string
/test
alias
-familysans-serif/family
-prefer
-familyMeera/family
-/prefer
- /alias
-/match
-
-match target=font
-test name=lang compare=contains
-stringml/string
-/test
-alias
familyserif/family
prefer
familyRachana/family
Index: smc-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/smc-fonts/devel/smc-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11
--- smc-fonts.spec 14 Oct 2009 05:43:10 - 1.10
+++ smc-fonts.spec 9 Dec 2009 06:30:09 - 1.11
@@ -8,16 +8,18 @@ traditional and new Malayalam Script.
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version: 04.2
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
Summary: Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
Group: User Interface/X
License: GPLv3+ with exceptions and GPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+
and GPLv2
URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/smc
Source:
http://download.savannah.nongnu.org/releases/smc/fonts/malayalam-fonts-%{version}.zip
+Source1: 66-smc-meera.conf
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel 1.13
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
Patch1: bug-523454.patch
+Patch2: bug-545683.patch
%description
%common_desc
@@ -54,7 +56,7 @@ Obsoletes: %{name}-meera 04.2-1
The Meera font package contains fonts for the display of
traditional Malayalam Scripts.
-%_font_pkg -n meera -f 90-%{fontname}-fonts.conf Meera*.ttf
+%_font_pkg -n meera -f *smc*.conf Meera*.ttf
%package -n %{fontname}-rachana-fonts
@@ -128,6 +130,7 @@ traditional Malayalam Scripts.
%prep
%setup -q -n malayalam-fonts-04
%patch1 -p1 -b .1-conffile
+%patch2 -p1 -b .2-fontconf_priority
%build
echo Nothing to do in Build.
@@ -139,11 +142,17 @@ install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 0644 -p $RPM_BUILD_DIR/malayalam-fonts-04/malayalam-fonts.conf
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-fonts.conf
-for fconf in %{fontconf}-fonts.conf ; do
+
+install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
+%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/66-smc-meera.conf
+
+for fconf in %{fontconf}-fonts.conf \
+ 66-smc-meera.conf ; do
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \
- %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf
+%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf
done
+
%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}
@@ -154,6 +163,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}
%dir %{_fontdir}
%changelog
+* Wed Dec 09 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 04.2-3
+- bugfix 545683
+
* Wed Oct 14 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 04.2-2
- bugfix 523454
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec, 1.3, 1.4
Author: pravins
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20211
Modified Files:
lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Wed Dec 09 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.4-3
- bugfix 520041
Index: lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-malayalam-fonts/devel/lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec 25 Sep 2009 12:03:45 - 1.3
+++ lohit-malayalam-fonts.spec 9 Dec 2009 06:52:45 - 1.4
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
%global fontname lohit-malayalam
-#%global fontconf 67-%{fontname}.conf
+%global fontconf 67-%{fontname}.conf
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version:2.4.4
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:Free Malayalam font
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -34,25 +34,26 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}
install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
-#install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
-# %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
+install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
+ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
-#install -m 0644 -p %{fontconf} \
-#%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
-#ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
-# %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
+install -m 0644 -p %{fontconf} \
+%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
+ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
+ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
%clean
rm -fr %{buildroot}
-
-%_font_pkg *.ttf
+%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
%doc ChangeLog COPYRIGHT COPYING AUTHORS README ChangeLog.old
-
%changelog
+* Wed Dec 09 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.4-3
+- bugfix 520041
+
* Fri Sep 25 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.4-2
- updated specs
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 520041] [ml_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Malayalam font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520041 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-12-09 01:54:02 EDT --- smc-fonts-04.2-3.fc13 built for rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 545683] [ml_IN] update the fontconf priority for Meera font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545683 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-12-09 01:54:44 EDT --- smc-fonts-04.2-3.fc13 built for rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 520041] [ml_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Malayalam font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520041 --- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com 2009-12-09 01:55:40 EDT --- and lohit-malayalam-fonts-2.4.4-2.fc13 too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-12-09 02:20:24 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863928 - rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. woff.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.20091126-2.fc12 ['0.20091126-2.fc13', '0.20091126-2'] The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. == can be fixed easily + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 59879f1bdeeafce7fc9d4b51406e80d7a4cd0293 woff-code-latest.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) I think you can also add woff-2009-10-03.html to %doc as it contains specification information. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 463036] LiberationSans-Bold 'u' and 'W' blurred in smaller sizes.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463036 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter...@redhat.com Version|10 |12 --- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-12-09 02:20:21 EDT --- Assuming this is still a problem? So moving to f12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477475] [un-extra-fonts] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477475 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|11 |rawhide AssignedTo|small...@get9.net |peter...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-12-09 02:22:18 EDT --- Taking this since I sponsored smallvil. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 539029] FTBFS knm_new-fonts-1.1-5.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539029 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter...@redhat.com AssignedTo|extras-orp...@fedoraproject |ta...@redhat.com |.org| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 539029] FTBFS knm_new-fonts-1.1-5.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539029 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-12-09 02:56:18 EDT --- This package has been deprecated by knm-new-fixed-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
