[Bug 547287] Both cache version -2 and -3 files exists

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547287





--- Comment #3 from Giandomenico  De Tullio ghi...@email.it  2009-12-15 
03:40:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 We don't clear the older versions.  It's a legitimate scenario to use a home
 directory with multiple versions of fontconfig, see deleting the old caches
 would be problematic.

Ok, then remove/comment the (useless) scriptlet lines: 

# Remove stale caches
rm -f /var/cache/fontconfig/.cache-2
rm -f /var/cache/fontconfig/stamp

کریسمس مبارک - (From wikipedia ;) )
:)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 32540] [Qt] Remove dead code from FontPlatformDataQt.cpp

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32540


Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #44847|review? |review+
   Flag||




--- Comment #2 from Eric Seidel e...@webkit.org  2009-12-15 01:15:53 PST ---
(From update of attachment 44847)
OK.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 32540] [Qt] Remove dead code from FontPlatformDataQt.cpp

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32540


Holger Freyther ze...@selfish.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Comment #3 from Holger Freyther ze...@selfish.org  2009-12-15 01:30:34 
PST ---
Landed in r52143.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 547287] Both cache version -2 and -3 files exists

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547287





--- Comment #4 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com  2009-12-15 07:26:16 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
 (In reply to comment #1)
  We don't clear the older versions.  It's a legitimate scenario to use a home
  directory with multiple versions of fontconfig, see deleting the old caches
  would be problematic.
 
 Ok, then remove/comment the (useless) scriptlet lines: 
 
 # Remove stale caches
 rm -f /var/cache/fontconfig/.cache-2
 rm -f /var/cache/fontconfig/stamp

I did in devel.  That was leftover from rawhide a few releases back when the
filenames were changed during a development cycle.

 کریسمس مبارک - (From wikipedia ;) )
 :)  

Thanks :).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 547532] freetype with the bytecode interpreter enabled falls back to no hinting instead of autohinting when no hinting bytecode is available

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547532





--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net  2009-12-15 
10:44:07 EDT ---
There are also the problems of:
1. the many partially hinted fonts that exist : the bytecode interpreter should
be used for hinted glyphs, and the autohinter for others, preferably at a
setting consistent with whet the bytecode interpreter does
2. the way bytecode interracts with fontconfig/gnome smoothing preferences:
with bytecode on, you need to change the gnome prefs to get the closest
approximation of the previous settings. It does not autoset the closest one
itself (this is going to annoy a lot of users)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 547532] freetype with the bytecode interpreter enabled falls back to no hinting instead of autohinting when no hinting bytecode is available

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547532





--- Comment #11 from Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org  2009-12-15 10:49:02 
EDT ---
The second part of 1 from comment #10 sounds a bit hard.

It's okay to leave it on for rawhide, but we should have a plan to revert if
the upstream fixes can't be in place in time.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 540962] [abrt] crash detected in java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-33.b16.fc12

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540962


Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||besfa...@redhat.com,
   ||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh
   ||at.com
  Component|java-1.6.0-openjdk  |pango
 AssignedTo|dbh...@redhat.com   |besfa...@redhat.com




--- Comment #8 from Deepak Bhole dbh...@redhat.com  2009-12-15 16:57:29 EDT 
---
Patch suggests that the bug is in Pango. Bouncing to pango team.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 547807] SIGSEGV in magazine_chain_pop_head in /usr/share/abrt/CCMainWindow.py

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547807


Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||besfa...@redhat.com,
   ||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh
   ||at.com
  Component|python  |pango
 AssignedTo|dmalc...@redhat.com |besfa...@redhat.com
Summary|[abrt] crash in |SIGSEGV in
   |python-2.6.2-2.fc12 |magazine_chain_pop_head
   ||in
   ||/usr/share/abrt/CCMainWindo
   ||w.py




--- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com  2009-12-15 17:57:31 EDT 
---
The backtrace in comment #1 is from /usr/share/abrt/CCMainWindow.py, not from
yumex; somewhat ironically, ABRT is crashing with a SIGSEGV whilst trying to
display information about a crash inside yumex.

The ABRT SIGSEGV is happening deep inside pango; frame #10 is trying to render
textual content within GTK tree/list view, and frame #9 and below is processing
the text, trying to calculate the size it will take (in pixels).

Looking at frame #6, it looks like Pango is trying to do linebreaking on a full
gdb backtrace from yumex, a rather large string.

Reassigning from python to pango in the hope of more insight.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 520041] [ml_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Malayalam font

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520041


Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 517635] [indic] fc-match output is not matching to current locale

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517635


Bug 517635 depends on bug 520041, which changed state.

Bug 520041 Summary: [ml_IN] Need fontconfig rules for Lohit Malayalam font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520041

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list


[Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font

2009-12-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461





--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-12-16 02:01:51 EDT ---
oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts-20031109-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts-20031109-2.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list