[Issue 76587] WW8: MathType object displ ayed without brackets etc.
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=76587 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 4 11:05:44 + 2010 --- *** Issue 25392 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 107831] Deprecated SEAC operator is not supported in PS-OTF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107831 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |66865) patch for fontforge | |/fontlint to warn about de | |preciated SEAC-like operat | |or in Type2 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon Dec 28 10:11:48 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=66865) patch for fontforge/fontlint to warn about depreciated SEAC-like operator in Type2 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 107831] Deprecated SEAC operator is not supported in PS-OTF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107831 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 22 13:59:17 + 2009 --- I'm not sure whether fontlint already warns about this yet, but the related fontforge project is already aware of the problem as the quick grep over the source shows fontforge/splinesave.c:/* Type2 doesn't allow any seacs */ What is meant here are the Type2 charstrings and these are used in about every PS-OTF-font out there to define the glyph outlines. If fontlint doesn't warn about it yet doing so would be a good idea. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 107834] sw: at various zoom value s the pseudu-bold/italic disappears in writer
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107834 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|fme |od OS/Version|Linux |All --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 22 14:25:16 + 2009 --- I agree that the patch against SW makes more sense and is safer. Reassigning to the owner of the patch target code in SW. The other platforms Aqua and Win also do artificial bold and italic so I wouldn't be surprised if it is reproducible there too. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(S FNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printin g
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 22 14:43:26 + 2009 --- See followup issue 107831 for support of the deprecated SEAC operator in PS-OTF Type2 charstrings. Some PS-OTFs still used this obsolete operator for some of their accented characters because they were converted 1:1 from their Type1 ancestors. If there are some important fonts that have not been converted to use valid and non-deprecated charstring operators then adding support for this ancient and very limited feature will be considered. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 107831] Deprecated SEAC operator is not supported in PS-OTF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107831 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 22 15:15:58 + 2009 --- Also see http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/opentype/index_composite.html : In the CFF/Type 2 charstring format, the seac operator is not supported. The priority of this issue depends on the importance of the fonts that have this problem. I do not expect them to be plentyful since if they were important enough to be maintained they would not use illegal operators. Anyway, here is the start of the list: - Yanone Kaffeesatz - older versions of FreeFontPro - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 107831] Deprecated SEAC operator is not supported in PS-OTF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107831 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 22 15:33:49 + 2009 --- Correction: current versions of Yanone Kaffeesatz use only non-deprecated operators. Thanks Jan! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 107831] Deprecated SEAC operator is not supported in PS-OTF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107831 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 22 15:36:24 + 2009 --- - ZapfinoPro is affected (http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2009/045689.html) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Fri Dec 18 08:16:00 + 2009 --- *** Issue 107759 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 31764] Need to support GPOS kerning
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=31764 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |107739 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 107254] Incorrect ToUnicode table mapping for ligatures in PDF
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=107254 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |STARTED --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Fri Dec 18 07:48:03 + 2009 --- . - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:17:48 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=65663) ps-result for the second sample document - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:26:20 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=65664) screenshot from a ps-viewer - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'fedorafonts,henrich_d,mah|'fedorafonts,henrich_d,mah |o,naruoga'|o,naruoga,pl' Status|NEW |STARTED --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 09:37:27 + 2009 --- I'm not sure that I understand the problem yet: 1. On which milestones was the problem confirmed? If it was DEV300_m56 or older then please check again with something newer (e.g. DEV300_m6x or OOO320_m0x) 2. Does the problem exist in the ps-export I attached (created with DEV300_m60 and IPA2.03 fonts)? 3. Would the problem be visible in the screenshot of a postscript-viewer? I attached a screenshot. If the problems are visible there please highlight them and attach the resulting image. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'fedorafonts,henrich_d,mah|'fedorafonts,hdu,henrich_d |o,naruoga,pl' |,maho,naruoga,pl' Assigned to|hdu |pl Status|STARTED |NEW OS/Version|Linux |Unix, X11 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Oct 27 14:06:23 + 2009 --- So the problem ares the lines with Encoding 0 /glyph1 put in the postscript file. The problem is reproducible with the old versions such as OOo31. AFAIK this is supposed to be prevented by http://hg.services.openoffice.org/DEV300/file/75b77d6c0e63/vcl/unx/source/fontmanager/fontmanager .cxx#l3661 which seems to come directly from http://gsl.openoffice.org/source/browse/gsl/psprint/source/fontmanager/fontmanager.cxx? r1=1.30r2=1.31 I'm not exactly sure how this is supposed to work. Reassigning to the author. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 104050] Apostrophes are not printed when using font 'Gentium' (wrong PS export)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh| |105631 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 105631] IPA PGothic,IPA PMincho font can't be printed
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105631 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value IssuesThisDependsOn| |104050 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |REMIND Target milestone|--- |OOo Later --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 11:31:07 + 2009 --- To be done when fontconfig support for that becomes available - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|REOPENED |STARTED --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 12:34:04 + 2009 --- Good to know as it is not very obvious from the fc27 release announcement: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/2009-June/003177.html Looking at the new APIs it is still not clear to me: how does an app decide when the substitution font suggested by fontconfig is not good enough so it should request AutoFontsAndMimeInstaller to search for other fonts and install them? Example: Segoe is not available but Frutiger is. FC suggests the latter as a fallback. Should OOo use Frutiger or should it ask AutoFontsAndMimeInstaller to search the internet for Segoe? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 13:42:04 + 2009 --- Ok, doing it as a last level resort for glyph fallback looks like a reasonable first step. The resulting modal dialog may be annoying though e.g. when something with an invalid encoding is pasted resulting in gazillions of weird codepoints. Regarding RFEs for this feature I already have an idea: make FC interact with AFAMI directly. If an app asks for a font with support for a specific codepoint and FC does not find a good answer, it should ask AFAMI for help. IMHO it should be configurable whether FC does this asynchronously, synchronously (using a modal) dialog or if the feature is disabled, globally or application specific or as part of the font pattern. OOo already does the right thing when the equivalent of a WM_FONTCHANGED comes along. I would prefer it to be asynchronous by default. And having a patterns like FC_AUTOFONT_REQUIRED, FC_AUTOFONT_SUGGESTED, FC_AUTOFONT_MAYBE or FC_AUTOFONT_DONTCARE would help to distinguish important use cases such as idle formating or UI-text. IMHO most external observers overestimate the number of OO.o people working on stuff like this... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 14:07:00 + 2009 --- I'd hoped to pick up this myself by F-12, I might try again to do this myself by F-13 Thanks! I still think you should concentrate on a FC-AFAMI interaction and then making sure that apps such OOo gets notified when they succeeded in installing new fonts. OOo will happily reformat then. Having FC negotiate with AFAMI would have so many benefits... as I already said in #desc5 FC has the full picture of what is going on, what is missing etc. And as a central configuration entity for font-related questions it will better know the relationships between different fonts, where to get them directly, where to get nice substitutions. Managing the font autoinstallation from a module other than FC just calls for trouble, useless extra work, annoying modal dialogs, etc. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 06:14:00 + 2009 --- [...] kerning problem [...] Using the provided sample document I didn't see any problem in the test version that was new compared to the related development milestone. Maybe something like issue 92746 or 78815 are meant here? [...] problems with Type1 fonts [...] Using the provided sample document I didn't see any problem in the test version that was that was new compared to the related development milestone. Please let's focus on the new feature of PS-OTF support for printing and PDF-export and any eventual regressions that might have introduced. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Fri Aug 21 12:11:15 + 2009 --- Font Width follows the OO-percentages but the spaces stays at 100% That's probably either issue 89129 or 104212, which seem to happen independently of PS-OTF or PS- TTF. I'm not sure if I already mentioned it but please let's focus on issues specific to the PS-OTF-support and the test-build... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 14:31:54 + 2009 --- The issue with the optional OpenType features is already tracked in issue 16032. Let's focus on the WYSIWIG aspect of printing and PDF embedding here. The fonts are subsetted to Type1 because the PS-printing code and the PDF-exporter have not been extended to support CFF-embedding yet. Since some important PS-printers do not support CFF-subsets being able to do it via Type1 is required anyway. And the subset is about the same size. There'll be a task for PS-printing and PDF-export to support CFF-subsets, but that is another issue. Let's focus on the WYSIWIG aspect of using PS-OTF in printing and PDF embedding here. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Aug 20 18:52:16 + 2009 --- [...] in the Mac version [...] DEV300m55 [...] nothing is fixed Please see #desc86 to learn where to get the test version. Please see http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ChildWorkSpace to understand that such a test version means step 15 of the issue handling process. Only when this test phase is over there will be a chance that the feature will ever get into a released development milestone (step 21) such as DEV300_mXX. And if we're lucky then CWS otf01 may get there in time for OOo 3.2. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|STARTED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 19 12:20:40 + 2009 --- Done in CWS otf01. The biggest part was the glue code to the existing PDF-export and PS-printer code. Another interesting detail is that small text prints well also on older printer (with PSLL3) as the hints are preserved. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 16032] OOo should support optional OpenType features
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=16032 This issue depends on issue 43029, which changed state: What|Old value |New value Status|STARTED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'arielch,awagner_mainz,bah|'arielch,awagner_mainz,bah |ein,benjamin_schallar,bern|ein,benjamin_schallar,bern |d_schoeler,ceplm,chrullric|d_schoeler,ceplm,chrullric |h,ckolivas,cwoollard,fedor|h,ckolivas,cwoollard,fedor |afonts,iorsh,jeongkyu,masa|afonts,hdu,iorsh,jeongkyu, |yan,msundman,scottchiefbak|masayan,msundman,scottchie |er,simos' |fbaker,simos' Assigned to|hdu |es --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 19 13:59:31 + 2009 --- @es: please verify in CWS otf01 (printing on UNX, PDF-export on WIN/UNX/OSX) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 104050] Apostrophes are not printed when using font 'Gentium' (wrong PS export)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Aug 11 08:13:54 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=64062) view inside the embedded Type42 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 104050] Apostrophes are not printed when using font 'Gentium' (wrong PS export)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|writerneedsconfirm|pl --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Aug 11 08:26:33 + 2009 --- The screenshot shows that inside the attached test.ps both apostrophes are embedded in the the type42 font. The right apostrophe is at glyph0, which is supposed to be reserved for the notdef glyph though, so I understand why some postscript interpreters could get confused by this. @pl: a problem seems to be pspgraphics: make sure only the notdef glyph gets into glyphpos0 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Wed Aug 5 09:20:48 + 2009 --- *** Issue 104011 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 69129] Add support for Graphite font technology
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=69129 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'fedorafonts,hdu,kpalagin,|'fedorafonts,hdu,kpalagin, |nmailhot,pagalmes,pl,pmike|kstribley,nmailhot,pagalme |,tessarakt' |s,pl,pmike,tessarakt' Assigned to|kstribley |sba --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 22 15:12:43 + 2009 --- sba: please verify in CWS graphite01 Testing hints: - Install the fonts from Keith's excellent test files first. For one of the test docs (for Nko) you'll need the Kankan font from http://openfontlibrary.org/media/files/nko_computers/402 - test the docs (display, print and PDF-export) and compare with them with the provided PDFs - the new features are currently only enabled for Win and Linux builds - watch out for regressions from the trunk (e.g. performance in large docs) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|2867,43495,81913,82986,977|2867,43495,81913,82986,977 is|65|65,103417 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 103157] Liberation Fonts v1.04 without kerning
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103157 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value IssuesThisDependsOn| |102911 This issue depends on issue 102911, which changed state: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |STARTED Status|STARTED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 103157] Liberation Fonts v1.04 have no kerning tables
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=103157 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID Summary|Liberation Fonts v1.04 wit|Liberation Fonts v1.04 hav |hout kerning |e no kerning tables --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Wed Jul 1 09:18:19 + 2009 --- Liberation 1.00 to 1.03 contained the traditional kern tables, but 1.04 did neither contain them nor their newer GPOS.kern counterparts. Version 1.05 provides kerning details only via GPOS, but not via the traditional tables. Since 1.05 onyl uses the pair adjustment type of GPOS.kern there is no good reason they do not also provide the traditional tables. Especially when considering the OpenType 1.06 specification, which is quite clear on that topic: Fonts intended for cross-platform use or for the Windows platform in general should conform to the 'kern' table format. I support this notion. @fyva: if you use fontforge to create your fonts please do not forget to enable the Traditional Kerning checkbox in File-GenerateFonts-Options-SFNT It would be even better if you used a version of fontforge that has my patch from issue 102911 applied. Other than that there is the enhancement issue 31764 for OOo to use GPOS.kern instead of SFNT.kern. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 93645] Add a Graphite module to support Graphite Smart Fonts
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93645 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Tue Jun 30 08:21:54 + 2009 --- Great job, thanks! I hope to get around to testing this when OOo3.1.1 and CWS otf01 are done. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 102652] Fonts in directory with name having underscore character in it, are not found
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=102652 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'eroshin,fedorafonts,kpala|'eroshin,fedorafonts,hdu,k |gin,pmike'|palagin,pmike' Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 13:42:49 + 2009 --- Should this still be considered a bug? If so, is it a Fedora or OOo bug? Looks like an issue for fontconfig. A very low priority issue though because fontconfig has the very reasonable expectation that fc-cache gets run whenever its directory structure or directory contents were changed. Not an issue for OOo though = adjusting status accordingly - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 54944] Provide way to mark forced font replacement
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54944 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 13:55:19 + 2009 --- Fixed dependency to issue 45128, thanks meywer! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon Jun 15 13:53:26 + 2009 --- *** Issue 102449 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon May 18 11:10:11 + 2009 --- Childworkspace otf01 looks good for a OOo 3.2 target. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'cmc,fedorafonts,hdu' |'cmc,fedorafonts,hdu,pl' OS/Version|All |Unix, X11 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon Apr 6 10:33:49 + 2009 --- Fontconfig already gets asked how a font should be substituted (font fallback). Fontconfig also gets asked when codepoints are not supported by a font (glyph fallback). Other apps also go via fontconfig, so it has a pretty good picture of what is going on: which fonts are available, which fonts are requested, which codepoints/languages need more support and in which font contexts these languages are used. So I think the best approach would be that fontconfig makes a list of suggestions first. The next step is to either broadcast the suggestions directly to AFI or have OOo poll the suggestions once in a while and broadcast them. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 2 09:59:34 + 2009 --- Looks good for 3.2... unless other high priorities like the Mac-Port, DrawingLayer rework, BiDi+CTL issues, Vista issues, bad but subtle regressions introduced by fontconfig- and cairo-integration, I18N issues etc. get in the way again... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 96826] Add font autoinstallation support
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=96826 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'fedorafonts' |'fedorafonts,hdu' Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Thu Jan 15 09:08:40 + 2009 --- confirmed. I guess thats a task for framework. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 93645] Add a Graphite module to support Graphite Smart Fonts
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93645 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'fedorafonts,mh,rene' |'fedorafonts,hjs,rene' --- Additional comments from h...@openoffice.org Fri Dec 12 16:27:29 + 2008 --- is that really intended to stay so? I guess not. But I wouldn't consider the CWS complete (from DEV-perspective) until Keith gives his OK. @kstribley: I guess Rene has a point that the tar.gz should be commited @ause: Actually I'm not 100% sure if this is correct? Or should the build process download such files into the download folder of external module's? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 93645] Add a Graphite module to support Graphite Smart Fonts
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93645 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'fedorafonts,hr,mh' |'fedorafonts,mh' Component|external |gsl QA contact|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subcomponent|www |code Target milestone|milestone 1 |OOo 3.1 Version|unspecified |OOo 3.0 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 4 09:31:30 + 2008 --- @kstribley: no problem, please take your time so that you feel confident that the CWS will work reliably on all platforms for all use cases. With ChildWorkSpaces like cairocanvastext, kashidafix or maybe even otf01 being already in the queue for OOo31, which all touch related code parts, it may be a wise idea to have graphite01 as an enhancement for a OOo3.2 target. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 93645] Add a Graphite module to support Graphite Smart Fonts
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=93645 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 3 07:55:07 + 2008 --- @kstribely: thanks! Is everything ready, i.e. is everything commited that needs to be commited? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'belegdol,beppec56,cmc,fed|'belegdol,beppec56,cmc,fed |orafonts,hdu,khirano,mba,m|orafonts,hdu,khirano,mba,m |eywer,norbusan,ralphie,ren|eywer,norbusan,ralphie,ren |e,thb'|e,thb,tora' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 3 08:48:12 + 2008 --- Is there anything as font-stretch in use in these [CJK-]fonts? Many CJK fonts come in two variants: monospaced and proportional Calling this attribute font-stretch is a bit of a stretch though... in this case the other commonly terms proportion or pitch are more appropriate @tora/@khirano: are you aware of any CJK font families that have other pitch-variants than monospaced or proportional, e.g. condensed or expanded? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 78749] some Latin text needs CTL processing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78749 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|OOo 3.0 |OOo 3.x --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 25 14:26:24 + 2008 --- target - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|OOo Later |OOo 3.2 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 24 13:21:29 + 2008 --- The good news is that CFF subsetting looks good for OOo 3.2, maybe even 3.1. Including hints and all that. Though CFF fonts may be common they are strange beasts, e.g. the length of some charstring opcodes depends on all instructions ever executed for one glyph and there are sooo many other implicit assumptions... anyway, the prototype works very well and getting it integrated into 3.x is quite certain. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 5 13:56:36 + 2008 --- *** Issue 42835 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|2867,43495,82986 |2867,43495,81913,82986 is| | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 5 14:00:05 + 2008 --- transfering the depends on issue 81913 from the duplicate issue 42835 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 5 14:16:11 + 2008 --- *** Issue 26012 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 28 10:45:31 + 2008 --- With 1 line of platform-specific code... This replaces the hundreds of lines of code of all the DrawText, DrawTextArray functions Great! If text justification, text decorations (like underline/strikethrough/emphasis marks), multi-line controls, etc. still work I'm quite impressed. Also supporting all the exotic use cases for rendering old metafiles would be nice. Any suggestions on how to get the glyph-by-glyph information with rendering::XTextLayout and/or from VCL is greatly appreciated use SalLayout::GetNextGlyphs() that interface is a little ad-hoc though and will be replaced by a container/iterator style interface, but the changes for users of that call will be trivial - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 88613] Canvas: cairo-based font rendering
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=88613 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |LATER Target milestone|--- |OOo Later --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 24 08:54:15 + 2008 --- The original issue here is that the current OOo-Canvas based on cairoquartz doesn't render text yet. Since Quartz can render beautiful text in its sleep if it gets a proper Quartz CGContext, I'm very sure this is a bug in the cairoquartz01 child workspace. I'll debug into it when I'll resync CWS aquabmpfixes01 to something = DEV300_m6. Other than that I'm afraid this issuezilla item is already drifting way off topic. I'll comment only ONCE on the other suggestions here. If needed please open focussed issues. --- Great ideas here! Thanks! I'll get right on it! On a second thought some Pango related questions come to mind: P1.) is Pango's layout engine that much better than Apple's native ATSUI or CoreText? P2.) is it at least that much better than Window's native Uniscribe? P3.) what are the specific benefits over ICU's layout engine that OOo uses on Unix? do specific http://bugs.icu-project.org/trac bugs have showstopper qualities? P4.) isn't Pango being obsoleted by HarfBuzz / Graphite on Unix? P5.) wouldn't we loose the justified text feature, that some/most author prefer? Also some related questions about Cairo's text rendering: C1.) is it that much better than Apple's native ATSUI or CoreText? C2.) is it at least that much better than Window's native Uniscribe? C3.) since CWS cairotext01 (http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS? Path=SRC680%2Fcairotext01) our Unix port supports it already It used to be better because of subpixel-rendering, but nowadays distributions switched exactly THAT feature off, so what are the remaining killer features? Speaking of text rendering on Unix I'd like to mention that during the live-time of OOo's unix codebase Xft (now unmaintained), STSF (now unmaintained) and pure XLFD were the right thing to do de jour. The answers to P1/P2/C1/C2 are such that even Pango itself just wraps the native layout engines. And since OOo uses UTF-16, Pango's interface is UTF-8 and the native layout engines are using UTF-16 again the roundtrip would be a nice way to warm up the cpu. For nothing! But getting rid of native text justification and losing access to the real layout engines for their potential advanced typography features. I'd also like to mention that a major difference between a browser and a word processor is that a browser aims especially for screen rendering whereas a word processor usually targets a non-screen device. In other words: most people would complain if their document's pages re-flowed when they changed the word processors zoom level (which corresponds to a Browser's default text size setting). This difference is responsible for application-layer problems like issue 88539 (Writer rendering), issue 51508 (Calc rendering) or issue #thb# (Impress rendering). Since people especially mean these issues when they comment on OOo text rendering problems they would be surprised that even if we did the herculean task to rip out the guts of GSL to replace it with the recommended stack these problems (and other niceties like issue 79878!) would remain just as before. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value OtherIssuesDependingOnTh|2867,43495|2867,43495,82986 is| | - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 43029] support PS-OpenType/OTF/(SFNT with CFF) fonts for PDF export and printing
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43029 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 14 09:29:11 + 2008 --- @nmailhot: Fedora is replacing its Type1 fonts by their CFF-OTF counterparts? That is very interesting and changes the priority of the feature request. @adrianjohnson: good to see you here. Welcome! I had a closer look at the PS export and especially its font handling. For CFF fonts the fallback method seems to be used: The glyph outlines get wrapped into a Type1, but hints are lost. Of course hints in Type1 fonts are not as important as for TTFs, but since the conversion between CFF and Type1 can be done without any loss, I was hoping for that. I already have some code that does that, but it is not reliable enough yet. If we need a quick solution the fallback to outlines seems to be a reasonable alternative though. On the other hand experts advocating CFF outlines over TTF outlines seem to be extremely sensitive about this topic. The full-CFF to subset-CFF conversion used in cairo's PDF export is very nice indeed. Thanks for the pointer! We'll need CFF-subsetting on Windows too, but don't have any use for other parts of cairo on that platform yet. There are not too many deep dependencies into cairo's infrastructure, so if breaking this part out is technically feasible I'd like to do it, if you agree. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 45128] Silent Failing is Bad Practice (Font fallback and Glyph Fallback)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=45128 User hdu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'fedorafonts,meywer,mmp,ss|'fedorafonts,hdu,meywer,mm |a,us' |p,ssa,us' Assigned to|hdu |requirements Component|gsl |specs QA contact|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Summary|Silently Failing is Bad Pr|Silent Failing is Bad Prac |actice (Font fallback)|tice (Font fallback and Gl | |yph Fallback) Subcomponent|code |www Target milestone|OOo Later |--- Version|OOo 1.1.4 |OOo 2.4.0 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 3 08:42:45 + 2008 --- @requirements: please define a nice UI for this and then reassign it to the framework(?) team In the GSL layers the functionality is already there: - to find out which font substitution is applied for which font on a specific output device do - call OutputDevice::SetFont(requested_font) - call OutputDevice::GetFontMetric() = the font that is actually used is right there in the result, including its font properties - to find out where glyph fallback is applied on a specific output device for a particular string do - call OutputDevice::HasGlyphs() to find out the parts of the string that the current font don't support - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 79878] OO.o can not select modern font faces conveniently
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 11 16:20:07 + 2008 --- Yes, adding a new SfxItem for FontWidth and following up this change by adjusting the applications and in the format would solve most of the problems. There might be (and there certainly will be) other stylistic differences in the same font family that cannot be expressed by the three stylistic attributes weight/slant/width. When the most urgent issue of handling different width styles is being addressed this should be considered, so we don't end up again with a too limited solution. @cmc: do you agree that solving the current problem is in sfx and above layers? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
