[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #19 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-02-15 13:21:07 EDT --- comps.xml is updated close this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #18 from Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com 2009-02-04 14:19:05 EDT --- As the package maintainer, you can do that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-02-03 21:15:15 EDT --- latest: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79588 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC||skvi...@fedoraproject.org Component|liberation-fonts|comps AssignedTo|ccha...@redhat.com |nott...@redhat.com QAContact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |ka...@redhat.com --- Comment #17 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-02-03 21:45:51 EDT --- hi rel-eng, please rename rpm in comps.xml from 'liberation-fonts' to 'liberation-fonts-compat': http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=81453 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #14 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 18:04:54 EDT --- thanks mclasen: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79588 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||quen...@armitage.org.uk --- Comment #15 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 18:44:28 EDT --- *** Bug 480750 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-19 19:18:00 EDT --- Some QA review: 1. the Microsoft font names are likely to be trademarked to hell, I hope someone checked with spot when they were added to the package description 2. the URL should probably be changed to the new fedorahosted Liberation homepage 3. Requires: %{name}-sans = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{name}-serif = %{version}-%{release} Requires: %{name}-mono = %{version}-%{release} is going to create a huge mess. You don't have any packages named %{name}-foo anymore, so package resolvers won't know what to do 4. If you want to create an upgrade path (good idea!) I suggest you do it in a compat package like dejavu, vera and mgopen. The advantage of a compat package is it has a different package name, so you don't mix past and present names, and is obviously going away someday, so people won't expect you to keep it forever For example the new vera spec includes: %package compat Summary: Bitstream Vera, compatibility Group: User Interface/X Obsoletes: bitstream-vera-fonts 1.10-9 Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts, %{fontname}-serif-fonts, %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts %description compat This package only exists to help transition pre 1.10-9 Bitstream Vera users to the new package split. It will be removed after one distribution release cycle, please do not reference it or depend on it in any way. […] %files compat IIRC the empty %files is needed for rpm to create an empty subpackage 5. this is somewhat confusing, but you do not need for the common subpackage to be named foo-common-fonts. I realise I hadn't really explained this point, so I've added http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_%28FAQ%29#Why_is_the_common_subpackage_in_the_multi-font-families_templates_named_foo-fonts-common_and_not_foo-common-fonts.3F to the FAQ. You're not the first one to ask/make the mistake (though it's mainly cosmetical) 6. Liberation is a bit special. It has specific fontconfig rules in fontconfig itself to handle MS fonts substitution, so Behdad would like you not to include fontconfig files in your liberation package (but do add them to non-Liberation packages). Vera had the same treatment when it mattered and so our vera package does not include fontconfig rules either 7. you do not need to require fontpackages-filesystem in the font subpackages, they require the common subpackage and it requires in turn fontpackages-filesystem do all is going to be well 8. you do not need to repeat the License info in each subpackage, if you don't list it the value of the main License declaration is going to be inherited by subpackages (you can check by doing a less on the package files once they're built) (you should not need to repeat Group either but this problem has only be fixed recently in a rpm version not available on our builders) 9. you should not Obsoletes:%{name}-foo %{version}-%{release} in your font subpackage, but Obsolete packages older than the particular version where the renaming occured. For liberation probably Obsoletes:%{name}-foo 1.04.93-4 10. The summary of your serif package has a problem, Liberation serif is not a sans-serif font 11. someday you really need to build the ttf from sfds in %build. In the meanwhile at least use the -p flag when installing the ttf files install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} 12. what's the purpose of the cd ../ in the middle of %install? 13. you should probably create %{buildroot}%{catalogue} the same way the other directories were created at the beginning of %install And that's all for this package. I don't have the time to look at baekmuk today, but I suppose a lot of the remarks apply to it too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(tcall...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #8 from Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-19 20:12:48 EDT --- Hi spot, what would be your comment about mentioning Microsoft's font name in liberation-fonts' descriptions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #9 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-19 21:18:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) And that's all for this package. I don't have the time to look at baekmuk today, but I suppose a lot of the remarks apply to it too I'll refine the baekmuk first. Thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-19 01:13:56 EDT --- renamed and rebuilt with %_font_pkg macro http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=79292 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-14 13:37:19 EDT --- FPC approved those two additional guidelines recently, please take them into account if you need to create or update a fonts package or subpackage: – 2009-01-14: naming http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_naming_%282009-01-13%29 — 2009-01-06: exact splitting rules http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Font_package_splitting_rules_%282008-12-21%29 (packagers that can drop font files and just depend on an existing font package are not impacted) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11 10:19:43 EDT --- To help packagers manage the transition to the new guidelines, we've published the following FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_other_packages_(FAQ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-09 10:42:54 EDT --- Please use the %_font_pkg macro; its an integral part of the official font packaging guidelines. Behdad requested an end to all the variations around fontconfig caching, so he does not have to check every font package for fontconfig breakage. The %_font_pkg macro puts all this stuff in a single package he can easily audit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Caius CHANCE ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-08 23:04:25 EDT --- built http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=77796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list