[Bug 459680] qt/kde: font antialiasing was disabled by uming fontconfig file.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459680 --- Comment #48 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-28 03:35:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330210) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330210) Screenshot with rawhide and qt-4.4.3-13.fc11.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 Bug 477448 depends on bug 480269, which changed state. Bug 480269 Summary: libraries in 1.7.5 broken for missing symbols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480269 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com 2009-01-28 05:43:41 EDT --- OK, I've added a new changelog entry. Is it OK?!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel sazanami-fonts.spec,1.4,1.5
Author: tagoh
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16599
Modified Files:
sazanami-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Wed Jan 28 2009 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 0.20040629-6.20061016
- Rename the package name again.
Index: sazanami-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/sazanami-fonts/devel/sazanami-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- sazanami-fonts.spec 25 Dec 2008 05:59:47 - 1.4
+++ sazanami-fonts.spec 28 Jan 2009 10:50:08 - 1.5
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version: 0.20040629
-Release: 5.%{fontver}%{?dist}
+Release: 6.%{fontver}%{?dist}
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildRequires: ttmkfdir = 3.0.6
@@ -44,30 +44,30 @@
This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages.
-%package gothic
+%package -n%{fontname}-gothic-fonts
Summary: Sazanami Gothic Japanese TrueType font
License: BSD
Group: User Interface/X
Conflicts: fonts-japanese = 0.20061016-9.fc8
-Provides: ttfonts-ja = 1.2-37
-Obsoletes: ttfonts-ja 1.2-37
+Provides: ttfonts-ja = 1.2-37, %{fontname}-fonts-gothic =
%{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: ttfonts-ja 1.2-37, %{fontname}-fonts-gothic
0.20040629-6.20061016
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
-%description gothic
+%description -n%{fontname}-gothic-fonts
%common_desc
This package contains Japanese TrueType font for Gothic type face.
-%package mincho
+%package -n%{fontname}-mincho-fonts
Summary: Sazanami Mincho Japanese TrueType font
License: BSD
Group: User Interface/X
Conflicts: fonts-japanese = 0.20061016-9.fc8
-Provides: ttfonts-ja = 1.2-37
-Obsoletes: ttfonts-ja 1.2-37
+Provides: ttfonts-ja = 1.2-37, %{fontname}-fonts-mincho =
%{version}-%{release}
+Obsoletes: ttfonts-ja 1.2-37, %{fontname}-fonts-mincho
0.20040629-6.20061016
Requires: %{name}-common = %{version}-%{release}
-%description mincho
+%description -n%{fontname}-mincho-fonts
%common_desc
This package contains Japanese TrueType font for Mincho type face.
@@ -133,6 +133,9 @@
%dir %{_fontdir}
%changelog
+* Wed Jan 28 2009 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 0.20040629-6.20061016
+- Rename the package name again.
+
* Thu Dec 25 2008 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com - 0.20040629-5.20061016
- Update the spec file to fit into new guideline. (#477453)
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #17 from Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com 2009-01-28 07:22:09 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts/sil-gentium-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts/sil-gentium-fonts-1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #18 from Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com 2009-01-28 07:23:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sil-gentium-fonts Short Description: Gentium Basic Font Family from SIL Owners: rbhalera Branches: devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477427, which changed state. Bug 477427 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477427] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-28 09:06:00 EDT --- khmeros-fonts, moodle updated in rawhide accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 Mathieu Bridon boche...@no-log.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@no-log.org 2009-01-28 09:02:35 EDT --- * I tried to contact the Debian Games SIG that is maintaining Adonthell / Waste's Edge in Debian and got no response from them. * I tried to contact to person on Facebook named C.J. Ellsworth to ask them if they were the author of this font, neither of them answered. = I assume I won't be able to get any more information about the license of the avatar.ttf font. Does this mean I must assume the font is not free and must be removed from the package in Fedora ? If so, then I guess I'll have to rebuild the package for F9, F10 and Rawhide, whereas simply conforming to the recent font guideline would have meant I needed to rebuild only for Rawhide ? (only to be sure I'm fully understanding the issues ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477481] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-28 09:47:57 EDT --- I'd say that yes, if you have no proof the font is floss you have to assume it isn't, and if there is a legal problem you need to rebuild in all branches. However, do not hesitate to discuss it with spot (either on IRC or by e-mail). He has the final say on legal problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476758] Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476758 Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nphil...@redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Nils Philippsen nphil...@redhat.com 2009-01-28 11:30:23 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: libspiro New Branches: F-9 F-10 Owners: kevin nphilipp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Boris Zbarsky (:bz) (todo: 175+ items) bzbar...@mit.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #358121|superreview?(bzbar...@mit.e |superreview+
Flag|du) |
--- Comment #58 from Boris Zbarsky (:bz) (todo: 175+ items) bzbar...@mit.edu
2009-01-28 10:58:00 PST ---
(From update of attachment 358121)
+++ b/gfx/src/nsFont.cpp
nsFont::nsFont(const char* aName, PRUint8 aStyle, PRUint8 aVariant,
Might be worth it to move these constructors to initializer syntax, maybe.
That can be a separate patch, of course.
+++ b/gfx/thebes/public/gfxFontConstants.h
+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_ULTRA_CONDENSED -4
+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_EXTRA_CONDENSED -3
+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_CONDENSED -2
+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_SEMI_CONDENSED -1
+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_NORMAL 0
+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_SEMI_EXPANDED 1
+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_EXPANDED2
+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_EXTRA_EXPANDED 3
+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_ULTRA_EXPANDED 4
+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_WIDER 10
+#define NS_FONT_STRETCH_NARROWER-10
Document or PR_STATIC_ASSERT that WIDER needs to be ULTRA_EXPANDED -
ULTRA_CONDENSED (or rather the min and max normal values of font-stretch) and
that NARROWER needs to be -WIDER? I assume it does so that we can tell apart
ULTRA_CONDENSED+WIDER and other values.
+++ b/layout/style/nsComputedDOMStyle.cpp
+nsComputedDOMStyle::GetFontStretch(nsIDOMCSSValue** aValue)
+ PR_STATIC_ASSERT(NS_FONT_STRETCH_NARROWER == -10);
+ PR_STATIC_ASSERT(NS_FONT_STRETCH_WIDER == 10);
How about:
PR_STATIC_ASSERT(NS_FONT_STRETCH_NARROWER % 2 == 0);
PR_STATIC_ASSERT(NS_FONT_STRETCH_WIDER % 2 == 0);
+ } else if (stretch = -5) {
...
+ } else if (stretch = 5) {
And make that |stretch = NS_FONT_STRETCH_NARROWER / 2| and |stretch =
NS_FONT_STRETCH_WIDER / 2| ? That looks like it should be eqivalent given the
range asserts in the header, right?
Alternately, if we had a FONT_STRETCH_MIN/MAX declared in the header we could
compare to them here (with strict and , presumably).
sr=bzbarsky with the nits.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 --- Comment #59 from David Baron [:dbaron] dba...@dbaron.org 2009-01-28 11:17:17 PST --- (In reply to comment #58) Document or PR_STATIC_ASSERT that WIDER needs to be ULTRA_EXPANDED - ULTRA_CONDENSED (or rather the min and max normal values of font-stretch) and that NARROWER needs to be -WIDER? I assume it does so that we can tell apart ULTRA_CONDENSED+WIDER and other values. I'll go with the document primarily because using PR_STATIC_ASSERT in header files is a real mess, because it depends on prlog.h, but we in turn depend on setting up FORCE_PR_LOG macros in special ways before the first include of prlog.h, so I'd really prefer to avoid including prlog.h from header files (and I don't want to get into that mess as part of this patch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 481434] Symbol U+0431 looks blurry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481434 Sergei Stolyarov ser...@regolit.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(ser...@regolit.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Sergei Stolyarov ser...@regolit.com 2009-01-28 14:58:14 EDT --- I used gimp 2.6.3 from Debian. But this symbol looks blurry in all programms. Afaik hints should be rewritten if glyph's shape changed. At least fontforge shows message this when changing any glyph with hints that hints will be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-28 16:07:17 EDT --- It's ok now, I didn't notice before you had made the change in several commits -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477332, which changed state. Bug 477332 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-28 16:35:52 EDT --- This one seems ok in the few tests I ran, let's close -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477044] [Tracker] Deploy new font packaging guidelines for Fedora 11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477044 Bug 477044 depends on bug 477435, which changed state. Bug 477435 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 What|Old Value |New Value Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
Resolution|RAWHIDE |
--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-28
16:41:42 EDT ---
Just a little nitpicking to keep the unowned-directory people happy; you should
replace:
%_font_pkg -n %{fontname} opens___.ttf
with:
%_font_pkg -n %{fontname} opens___.ttf
%dir %{_fontdir}
(directory ownership of the ttf dir is not automatic because some people do not
like multiply-owned directories)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-28 16:48:57 EDT --- oops; probably want to have the srpm named sil-gentium-basic-fonts since we already have a gentium-fonts package that will eventually be renamed sil-gentium-fonts (missed this, sorry, too much stuff to review and too little time) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #36 from Jan Falkenhagen spam.t...@lkenhagen.de 2009-01-28 17:27:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=330294) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=330294) rendering issues with uptodate fedora system e.g. xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.9.0-63.fc10 the problem still exists for me too. sometimes its better (like shown in the screenshot) sometimes it is worse, but there is no day without this behaviour. graphics card is: 00:0b.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 PRO] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480479] [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480479 --- Comment #3 from Wart w...@kobold.org 2009-01-28 18:06:56 EDT --- It's still not clear to me what is the correct package name to use which will provide /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf. Currently in rawhide the package is dejavu-sans-fonts. Is this going to be the final name for this package? I'd hate to keep rebuilding this 55MB+ package just because font package names keep changing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-01-28 18:28:41 EDT --- we can do that I guess, no skin off my nose -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476758] Review Request: libspiro - Library to simplify the drawing of beautiful curves
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476758 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-28 19:27:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-28 19:32:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #36 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-28 19:35:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477453] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477453 --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-01-28 19:38:49 EDT --- Updated again in sazanami-fonts-0.20060629-6.20061016.fc11 for new naming rule. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts make default in chinese-support group
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com, ||fedora-i18n-b...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 476459] make wqy-zenhei-fonts default in @chinese-support group
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|10 |rawhide Summary|wqy-zenhei-fonts make |make wqy-zenhei-fonts |default in chinese-support |default in @chinese-support |group |group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457955] Review Request: cf-bonveno-fonts - BonvenoCF font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter...@redhat.com Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF |cf-bonveno-fonts - |font|BonvenoCF font Alias|bonvenocf-fonts |cf-bonveno-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 480479] [wormux] Adapt to font package renamings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480479 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-29 02:00:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) It's still not clear to me what is the correct package name to use which will provide /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf. Currently in rawhide the package is dejavu-sans-fonts. Yes Is this going to be the final name for this package? I'd hate to keep rebuilding this 55MB+ package just because font package names keep changing. It's even more fun to rebuild font packages because FPC decided it wanted pretty package names and forgot to tell you before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: sil-gentium-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rooz...@gmail.com --- Comment #20 from Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com 2009-01-29 02:30:57 EDT --- Please rename the package to sil-gentium-basic-fonts. We already have Gentium, which will be renamed to sil-gentium-fonts. Updating the CVS request: New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sil-gentium-basic-fonts Short Description: Gentium Basic Font Family from SIL Owners: rbhalera Branches: devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477335] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||482985 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 482985] New: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Summary: Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rooz...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-rev...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Depends on: 176096 Blocks: 477335 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 481476 Renaming of gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts to comply with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Naming New package: http://roozbeh.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts.spec http://roozbeh.fedorapeople.org/sil-gentium-fonts-1.02-7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477335] doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|482985 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477337] gentium-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477337 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||482985 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 482985] Renaming review: gentium-fonts to sil-gentium-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482985 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|477335 |477337 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477335] doulos-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Please convert to new font |doulos-fonts: convert to |packaging guidelines|new font packaging ||guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 477337] gentium-fonts: convert to new font packaging guidelines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477337 Roozbeh Pournader rooz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Please convert to new font |gentium-fonts: convert to |packaging guidelines|new font packaging ||guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf, NONE, 1.1 cf-bonveno-fonts.spec, NONE, 1.1 import.log, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: ankursinha
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28314/devel
Modified Files:
.cvsignore sources
Added Files:
cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf cf-bonveno-fonts.spec
import.log
Log Message:
* Thu Jan 29 2009 Ankur Sinha ankursi...@fedoraproject.org
- 1.1-3
- Added package to CVS
--- NEW FILE cf-bonveno-fonts-fontconfig.conf ---
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd
fontconfig
alias
familysans-serif/family
prefer
familyBonvenoCF/family
/prefer
/alias
alias
familyBonvenoCF/family
default
familysans-serif/family
/default
/alias
/fontconfig
--- NEW FILE cf-bonveno-fonts.spec ---
%define fontnamecf-bonveno
%define fontconf60-%{fontname}.conf
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version:1.1
Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:A fun font by Barry Schwartz
Group: User Interface/X
License:GPLv2+
URL:http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/bonveno.xhtml
Source0:http://home.comcast.net/~crudfactory/cf3/fonts/BonvenoCF-1.1.zip
Source1:%{name}-fontconfig.conf
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontforge, fontpackages-devel
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
%description
A set of fun fonts from the crud factory.
%prep
%setup -q -c
for txt in COPYING README ; do
sed 's/\r//' $txt $txt.new
touch -r $txt $txt.new
mv $txt.new $txt
done
%build
fontforge -script - BonvenoCF*.sfd EOF
i = 1
while ( i \$argc )
Open (\$argv[i], 1)
Generate (\$fontname + .ttf)
PrintSetup (5)
PrintFont (0, 0, , \$fontname + -sample.pdf)
Close()
i++
endloop
EOF
%install
rm -fr %{buildroot}
install -dm 755 %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -pm 644 *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_fontdir}
install -m 755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}
install -m 644 -p %{SOURCE1} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}
ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf} \
%{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/%{fontconf}
%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}
%_font_pkg -f %{fontconf} *.ttf
%doc COPYING* README*
%dir %{_fontdir}/
%changelog
* Tue Jan 20 2009 Ankur Sinha ankursi...@fedoraproject.org
- 1.1-3
- changed font config file according to files provided in the
fontpackages-devel package.
* Sun Jan 4 2009 Ankur Sinha ankursi...@fedoraproject.org
- 1.1-2
- rebuilt as per new font packaging guidelines
* Mon Dec 15 2008 Ankur Sinha ankursi...@fedoraproject.org
- 1.1-1
- rebuilt on fedora 10 (#457955 at bugzilla)
--- NEW FILE import.log ---
cf-bonveno-fonts-1_1-3_fc10:HEAD:cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm:1233214810
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- .cvsignore 29 Jan 2009 00:33:07 - 1.1
+++ .cvsignore 29 Jan 2009 07:43:31 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+BonvenoCF-1.1.zip
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cf-bonveno-fonts/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- sources 29 Jan 2009 00:33:08 - 1.1
+++ sources 29 Jan 2009 07:43:31 - 1.2
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+373a25b036bcbdee2daecf05e4b9e43d BonvenoCF-1.1.zip
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal issues with new font guidelines
Le Mer 28 janvier 2009 14:18, Tom \spot\ Callaway a écrit : If this obsoletes the need for a -common package, then do not create one. However if you don't you'll have to deal with the directory ownership of the common font directory (I purposefully didn't want to open this particular can of worm) and other common files. Also documentation can be bulky, especially when upstream provides in in pdf or .doc form with embedded bitmaps of what the font looks like. -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal issues with new font guidelines
Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Mer 28 janvier 2009 15:54, Tom \spot\ Callaway a écrit : ke. Well, it seems like there wouldn't be much of a case to obsolete -common in that scenario, just move the license into each subpackage. I was not clear, sorry. In that case documentation is a multi-meg .doc or .pdf file that includes windows installation instructions, examples of the font use in bitmap image form, and the § that says oh, and BTW, the font is © X and released under the OFL Shouldn't it be -docs then? -common sounds like something the rest of the packages should depend on, which apparently is not the case here. I don't really like the sans and serif separation. It may make sense for megafonts like DejaVu, or CJK fonts, but can't think of any other case. behdad And to repeat my first message, the hypothetical use case is selective extraction of rpm content without using rpm, and re-distribution of selective parts of the distribution by third-parties without respecting constrains we enforce via rpm, which is not something we can be sued from since *we* would not be the ones doing the selective incomplete re-distribution. If we start worrying about this we may as well refuse to package all the fonts that do not include full licensing information in their metadata, since nothing would stop the hypothetical third-party to re-distribute the font files without the detached license file anyway (regardless in which package we deploy it) ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal issues with new font guidelines
Le mercredi 28 janvier 2009 à 13:38 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit : Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Mer 28 janvier 2009 15:54, Tom \spot\ Callaway a écrit : ke. Well, it seems like there wouldn't be much of a case to obsolete -common in that scenario, just move the license into each subpackage. I was not clear, sorry. In that case documentation is a multi-meg .doc or .pdf file that includes windows installation instructions, examples of the font use in bitmap image form, and the § that says oh, and BTW, the font is © X and released under the OFL Shouldn't it be -docs then? -common sounds like something the rest of the packages should depend on, which apparently is not the case here. It's not -doc because 1. the common packages has also a technical role as owner of common directory 2. several font packages put more than just doc in it (core font indexes, etc) 3. and anyway that's just a name, so please everyone take a break and not start another bike-shedding stage. If you want to comment comment on the technical spec templates, I've taken enough grief over renamings others inflicted on me I won't support in any way a new renaming crusade. I don't really like the sans and serif separation. It may make sense for megafonts like DejaVu, or CJK fonts, but can't think of any other case. I can't think of a single srpm in the repository where sans and serif are updated in lockstep at the same coverage (or style) level, except perhaps liberation (and I wouldn't expect this state to survive any serious community contribution). So in theory, I may agree with you, but in practice, sans and serif have different lives. And even if there were some, I wouldn't want to introduce exceptions that induce documentation and maintenance burdens just to make it a little prettier. Brutal simple same rules for everyone is much easier on packagers. -- Nicolas Mailhot signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée ___ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
