Re: [Fedora-legal-list] java-gnome: GPLv2 with a classpath exception like statement
On 12/31/2009 08:17 AM, Alexander Boström wrote: Hello, I'd like to ask someone to have a look at the license for java-gnome, the GNOME Java bindings: http://research.operationaldynamics.com/bzr/java-gnome/mainline/LICENCE I'm hoping it can be added to the acceptable licenses list. Presumably after that happens I can put License: GPLv2 with exceptions in the corresponding spec file. This is the Classpath exception, which is fine for Fedora. Go ahead and use: License: GPLv2 with exceptions (I've added entries for the Classpath exception to the GPL section of the Licensing list to make this clear.) ~spot ___ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] java-gnome: GPLv2 with a classpath exception like statement
Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se wrote: I'm hoping it can be added to the acceptable licenses list. Presumably after that happens I can put License: GPLv2 with exceptions in the corresponding spec file. Is it wrong to fall back to License: GPLv2 in the meantime? I'd like to have the exception though to hopefully make it GPLv3 compatible. This may be impossible, note that GPLv3 allows a downstream to remove permissive exceptions. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list