kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 compiled from source will not boot
There is something seriously wrong with this kernel release. It compiles - but will not boot all the way. It hangs somewhere. I even tried to boot into single user mode. I never get to the shell prompt when booting in single user mode, nor to the gnome login banner when letting it boot in multiuser mode. After some 30-45 minutes I Ctrl-Alt_Del and the kernel pops the message Stopping all md devices .. and the pc reboots. I did not have this problem with 2.6.29.6-213.fc11 nor with it's predecessor 2.6.29.5-191.fc11 Are there others who have tried to build 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 from source rpm and configured the kernel in any way before building? Did you see any errors when running make install modules_install - as I did? Did the resulting kernel boot up all the way? If you need more info, please let me know. Markus K. _ Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=PID23384::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:NF_BR_sync:082009 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 compiled from source will not boot
On Sunday 09 August 2009 11:16:12 pm Markus Kesaromous wrote: There is something seriously wrong with this kernel release. Again -- the list you want is fedora-kernel-list, NOT fedora-devel-list. Regards, -- Conrad Meyer ceme...@u.washington.edu -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: rpms/gnash/devel gnash.spec,1.57,1.58
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:54:40 + (UTC), Kevin wrote:
Author: kkofler
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/gnash/devel
%files devel
-%{_prefix}/include/gnash/*.h
+%{_includedir}/gnash/*.h
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/gnash.pc
%files widget
-%{_prefix}/include/gnash/*.h
+%{_includedir}/gnash/*.h
%{python_sitearch}/*
As I see that I wonder which package owns the gnash directory?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories
Also, %defattr is missing for the two packages quoted here.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: FedoraStudio: the final step
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 19:26 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: Hello everyone, (If you don't own a multimedia package you can skip this thread) This is a call for help for adjusting the .desktop files of your multimedia applications according to the new FedoraStudio feature [1]. For those who missed the news, with F-12 we will have an optional multimedia-menus package that will subcategorize the SoundVideo menu in Gnome (Multimedia menu in KDE). This package is currently geared towards multimedia creation folks, however this target audience may be expanded in the future to meet the demand. To place the applications in the proper category, the .desktop files need to have proper categories listed. Since I am a (co)maintainer of most audio creation packages in Fedora, I have finished most of the required work. However there are a few packages left that need to be addressed. So please follow the link [2] and check if your multimedia package meets the criteria for any of the submenus we will have. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. I will do a final check around September 8th, about two weeks before the beta freeze and fix the remaining .desktop files. Also let me know if you don't want your package to be touched. I didn't change this for gnome-volume-control seeing as it shows up in the (hardware) preferences rather than in the main menu. Cheers PS: Adjusting your .desktop file with this specification will not change the experience of anyone who doesn't have the multimedia-menus package installed. Your application will be still in the SoundVideo/Multimedia desktop menu as long as you have AudioVideo listed as a category in your .desktop file. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraStudio [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraStudio#Outline -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rawhide report: 20090810 changes
Compose started at Mon Aug 10 06:15:06 UTC 2009 Updated Packages: xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-0.0.15-2.20090805git712064e.fc12 - * Wed Aug 05 2009 Ben Skeggs bske...@redhat.com 0.0.15-2.20090803git712064e - dri2 fixes, no wfb without kms, non-kms fb resize fixes, other misc fixes Summary: Added Packages: 0 Removed Packages: 0 Modified Packages: 1 Broken deps for i386 -- 389-ds-1.1.3-4.fc12.noarch requires 389-ds-admin R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.i586 requires openmpi-libs asterisk-fax-1.6.1-0.24.rc1.fc12.i686 requires libspandsp.so.1 bigboard-0.6.4-12.fc12.i686 requires mugshot = 0:1.1.90-1 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libclutter-cairo-0.8.so.0 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libcluttermm-0.8.so.2 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.8.so.0 clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires pkgconfig(cluttermm-0.8) clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires pkgconfig(clutter-0.8) clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-gtk-0.9.so.0 clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.9.so.0 clutter-gtkmm-devel-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires pkgconfig(clutter-gtk-0.9) cluttermm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.9.so.0 cluttermm-devel-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires pkgconfig(clutter-0.9) dap-hdf4_handler-3.7.9-2.fc11.i586 requires libdap.so.9 dap-hdf4_handler-3.7.9-2.fc11.i586 requires libdapserver.so.6 entertainer-0.4.2-5.fc12.noarch requires pyclutter-cairo octave-forge-20080831-10.fc12.i686 requires octave(api) = 0:api-v32 perl-DBIx-Class-Schema-Loader-0.04006-4.fc12.noarch requires perl(DBIX::Class) php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc12.noarch requires php-pear(HTML_Template_PHPLIB) plplot-octave-5.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires octave(api) = 0:api-v32 ppl-yap-0.10.2-5.fc12.i686 requires libYap.so python-repoze-what-quickstart-1.0-2.fc12.noarch requires python-repoze-who-plugins-sql qtparted-0.4.5-19.fc11.i586 requires libparted-1.8.so.8 rubygem-main-2.8.4-3.fc12.noarch requires rubygem(fattr) = 0:1.0.3 sems-1.1.1-2.fc12.i586 requires libspandsp.so.1 sems-g722-1.1.1-2.fc12.i586 requires libspandsp.so.1 sems-gsm-1.1.1-2.fc12.i586 requires libspandsp.so.1 sems-speex-1.1.1-2.fc12.i586 requires libspandsp.so.1 serpentine-0.9-5.fc12.noarch requires gnome-python2-nautilus-cd-burner showimg-pgsql-0.9.5-22.fc11.i586 requires libpqxx-2.6.8.so sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libc.so.6()(64bit) sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libm.so.6()(64bit) sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) sugar-pippy-34-2.fc12.i686 requires libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) thunderbird-lightning-1.0-0.8.20090513hg.fc12.i686 requires thunderbird 0:3.0-3.6.b4 trac-customfieldadmin-plugin-0.1-0.1.svn5073.fc10.noarch requires trac-webadmin-plugin trac-customfieldadmin-plugin-0.1-0.1.svn5073.fc10.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.5 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-ds-1.1.3-4.fc12.noarch requires 389-ds-admin R-RScaLAPACK-0.5.1-19.fc11.x86_64 requires openmpi-libs asterisk-fax-1.6.1-0.24.rc1.fc12.x86_64 requires libspandsp.so.1()(64bit) bigboard-0.6.4-12.fc12.x86_64 requires mugshot = 0:1.1.90-1 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libclutter-cairo-0.8.so.0 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libcluttermm-0.8.so.2 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.8.so.0 clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libclutter-cairo-0.8.so.0()(64bit) clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libcluttermm-0.8.so.2()(64bit) clutter-cairomm-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires libclutter-glx-0.8.so.0()(64bit) clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires pkgconfig(cluttermm-0.8) clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.i586 requires pkgconfig(clutter-0.8) clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(cluttermm-0.8) clutter-cairomm-devel-0.7.4-2.fc11.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(clutter-0.8) clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-gtk-0.9.so.0 clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.i586 requires libclutter-glx-0.9.so.0 clutter-gtkmm-0.9.4-1.fc12.x86_64 requires
Re: enigmail for F-11's thunderbird ?
El Sat, 08-08-2009 a las 12:03 -0400, Mail Lists escribió: On 08/08/2009 07:38 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D) wrote: On 08/08/09 12:39, Gregory Hosler wrote: Hi all, Works fine for me. Did you get TB from Mozilla? I believe enigmail is setup fro the Fedora packaged version of TB, which is on TB 3 Beta2 I am using stock F11 tb and enigmail from rpmfusion on x64 - and it does NOT work. It says 'not compatible'. Why is thunderbird-enigmail in rpfusion-free rather than fedora proper? Actually, why does rpmfusion-free even exist? A cheeky question, admittedly, but I'm honestly curious. Since the mozilla builds do not provide x64 (which is a shame 64 bit are basically the baseline now with core 2) and the plugins are not 64 bit I am not using them - but if you use the 32 bit mozilla tb and enigmail nightly from mozilla - they do work. And here's another thing I've been wondering for years: why doesn't Mozilla provide Linux x86_64 builds? It should probably be asked on one of their lists, though. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Consistent PolicyKit system policy
When defining a new policy mechanism for PolicyKit, what are the rules for setting the default policy? PolicyKit's flexibility is excellent, but it means that we have to choose sensible and consistent defaults for each application that uses it. I ask because the default policy for cups-pk-helper is to require the root password, and not to remember it even for that session. What is the goal of the default Fedora PolicyKit policy system-wide, and how can we check that PolicyKit mechanisms' default policies are adhering to it? For example, what should the default Fedora policy be for locally connected peripherals? Tim. */ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: enigmail for F-11's thunderbird ?
Actually, why does rpmfusion-free even exist? A cheeky question, admittedly, but I'm honestly curious. AFAIK, it's because there are some free software that are not acceptable in Fedora. A free implementation of a patented codec comes to mind. -- Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Consistent PolicyKit system policy
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Tim Waughtwa...@redhat.com wrote: What is the goal of the default Fedora PolicyKit policy system-wide, and how can we check that PolicyKit mechanisms' default policies are adhering to it? Generally where I'd like to move to is where the RPM package defaults are appropriate for a shared computer lab PC, and the desktop spin kickstart modifies things as appropriate for the unmanaged home PC/laptop. You could think of computer lab PC as very similar to the our heritage, the timesharing unix server case, except that it makes sense for say plugging in a USB key to do something useful. An example of something that would be different between the RPM package and desktop spin is the policy for software installation. In the RPM package it should be either none allowed or initiate updates only, whereas the desktop spin would allow clickthrough for arbitrary RPM installation. (This is mainly relevant in the future when we don't have a separate root password in important places in the UI flow). We don't do this at all now though =) For your particular case I think your current policy is the best we can do for all targets. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Isue on building blender agains system ftgl library
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Jochen Schmittjoc...@herr-schmitt.de wrote: Unfortunately, I have got the following error message: /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.so when searching for -lc build/linux2/lib/libbf_ftfont.a(FTF_TTFont.o): In function `FTF_TTFont::GetBoundingBox(char*, float*, float*, float*, float*, float*, float*, unsigned int)': /home/s4504kr/cvs/fedora/blender/devel/blender-2.49a/source/blender/ftfont/intern/FTF_TTFont.cpp:381: undefined reference to `FTFont::BBox(wchar_t const*, float, float, float, float, float, float)' The build log shows that the object files were all compiled in 64-bit mode. This message (and the others following it in the build log) are complaints about trying to link 32-bit libraries against the 64-bit object files. This is because the link line for build/linux2/bin/blender includes -L/usr/lib. (It also includes -L/usr/lib64, twice, which is unnecessary.) -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal
On 08/07/2009 02:54 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Pointing it out on a review and restoring to calling the packages bad quality if people don't follow your controversial recommendation isn't going to scale at all. This is a good perspective, Ralf. Putting the same energy into individual reviews won't have as amplified an impact as convincing the packaging committee of problems. I understand the theoretical value of a deterministic package build - I'm not aware of specific examples of where non-determinism has caused problems in Fedora, though I can imagine some. Gathering evidence of breakage may cause a change of opinion. Having a practical alternative is probably required as well. -Bill P.S. I support your position to not review packages you find morally offensive. Fedora itself is a moral stance (on Free software), and as such should not ask its members to behave in a personally unethical manner. -- Bill McGonigle, Owner BFC Computing, LLC http://bfccomputing.com/ Email, IM, VOIP: b...@bfccomputing.com Telephone: +1.603.448.4440 Twitter, etc.: bill_mcgonigle/bill.mcgonigle VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: enigmail for F-11's thunderbird ?
On 08/10/2009 08:50 AM, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Why is thunderbird-enigmail in rpfusion-free rather than fedora proper? As currently constructed, enigmail's SRPM requires the entire Thunderbird source. I speculated here last week that perhaps we need a thunderbird-devel package, but I don't know enough to qualify that. -Bill -- Bill McGonigle, Owner BFC Computing, LLC http://bfccomputing.com/ Email, IM, VOIP: b...@bfccomputing.com Telephone: +1.603.448.4440 Twitter, etc.: bill_mcgonigle/bill.mcgonigle VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review: Fedora 12 Alpha Release Notes
Rahul Sundaram on 08/10/2009 10:08 AM wrote: Please edit the wiki directly for any improvements if you can or reply with suggestions. Thanks. Why are some internal Fedora wiki links set as external links? For example: [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Dracut Dracut] instead of [[Dracut]] -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review: Fedora 12 Alpha Release Notes
On 08/10/2009 09:00 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: Rahul Sundaram on 08/10/2009 10:08 AM wrote: Please edit the wiki directly for any improvements if you can or reply with suggestions. Thanks. Why are some internal Fedora wiki links set as external links? No particular reason. Fixed. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal
On 08/10/2009 05:17 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote: On 08/07/2009 02:54 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Pointing it out on a review and restoring to calling the packages bad quality if people don't follow your controversial recommendation isn't going to scale at all. This is a good perspective, Ralf. Putting the same energy into individual reviews won't have as amplified an impact as convincing the packaging committee of problems. I am member of the FPC, but ... I have failed to convince the FPC so far. I understand the theoretical value of a deterministic package build - I'm not aware of specific examples of where non-determinism has caused problems in Fedora, though I can imagine some. They are very easy to demonstrate. Commonly known cases are building gcc, binutils, gdb, firefox etc. Other cases are pretty easy to find. Actually, probably almost any non-trivial, complex package has such issues. It's only the fact that most packages are trivial autotool-wise and the fact that autotools-changes often are subtile, which lets people who are not intimate with the autotools (erroroniously) believe it's safe to run autotools during builts. Gathering evidence of breakage may cause a change of opinion. Having a practical alternative is probably required as well. The practical alternative is very simple: Run the autotools on the system you are testing on, create diffs from them and to apply them during builds. I am applying this approach to several of my Fedora packages (some of which I know to suffer from such issues, e.g. Coin2), fixed some packages (owned by others) this way, which had failed during the F11-mass-rebuild, exactly because of such issues. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Firefox SELinux bug from Alpha Blockers meeting.
Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) (boche...@fedoraproject.org) said: I just wanted to know if I should open a new bug report for Epiphany as SEAlert got confused or if it is indeed the same bug, in which case I'll be patient. See bug 516057. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
source file audit - 2009-08-10
Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. - There are 1060 lines in this run. Up from 884 last run. 700 sourcecheck-20070826.txt 620 sourcecheck-20070917.txt 561 sourcecheck-20071017.txt 775 sourcecheck-20080206.txt 685 sourcecheck-20080214.txt 674 sourcecheck-20080301.txt 666 sourcecheck-20080401.txt 660 sourcecheck-20080501.txt 642 sourcecheck-20080603.txt 649 sourcecheck-20080705.txt 662 sourcecheck-20080801.txt 912 sourcecheck-20081114.txt 884 sourcecheck-20090215.txt 1060 sourcecheck-20090810.txt You can find the results file at: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/sourcecheck/sourcecheck-20090810.txt And also attached to this mail. Lines in the output are of three forms: - BADURL:base-file-name:$PACKAGENAME This means that the URI provided in the Source(s) line didn't result in a download of the source. This could be any of: URL changed, version changed and URL wasn't updated, Site is down, Site is gone, etc. Also there are a number of packages with incorrect sourceforge links. (BTW, there are still some packages with ftp://people.redhat.com/ URLs). - BADSOURCE:$SOURCENAME:$PACKAGENAME This means that the source was downloaded ok from the upstream site, but doesn't match the md5sum given in the sources file. This could be due to needing to strip out content that fedora cannot ship (but in that case you shouldn't have the full URI in the Source line). Or upstream following poor release practices and updating without changing their release. - BAD_CVS_SOURCE:$SOURCENAME:$PACKAGENAME This means that the file was downloaded from the URI given, and the md5sum did not match the file thats present in CVS (not the lookaside). This might be due to timestamps, or any of the above reasons. kevin -- abbot:BADURL:mitter-0.4.3.tar.gz:mitter abbot:BADURL:protobuf-2.0.2.tar.bz2:protobuf abompard:BADSOURCE:cryptopp560.zip:cryptopp abompard:BADSOURCE:pure-ftpd-1.0.22.tar.bz2:pure-ftpd abompard:BADURL:awstats-6.9.tar.gz:awstats abompard:BADURL:Comet_Catcher_Redux.sd7:spring-maps-default abompard:BADURL:glest_data_3.2.1.zip:glest-data abompard:BADURL:psi-0.13.tar.bz2:psi abompard:BADURL:Sands_of_War_v2.sd7:spring-maps-default abompard:BADURL:SmallDivide.sd7:spring-maps-default adalloz:BADURL:pan-0.133.tar.bz2:pan adrian:BADURL:gmpc-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-alarm-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-avahi-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-coveramazon-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-extraplaylist-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-jamendo-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-last-fm-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-libnotify-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-lirc-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-lyrics-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-lyricwiki-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-magnatune-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-mdcover-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-mserver-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-osd-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-shout-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-tagedit-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:gmpc-wikipedia-0.18.0.tar.gz:gmpc adrian:BADURL:libmpd-0.18.0.tar.gz:libmpd agoode:BAD_CVS_SOURCE:fvwm-xdg-menu.py:fvwm ajax:BADURL:vbetool-1.2.1.tar.bz2:vbetool akahl:BADURL:bmpx-0.40.14.tar.bz2:bmpx akahl:BADURL:ZendFramework-1.8.4PL1.tar.gz:php-ZendFramework akurtakov:BADSOURCE:jdepend-2.6-RHCLEAN.zip:jdepend akurtakov:BADURL:birt-source-2.5M7.zip:eclipse-birt allisson:BADURL:amora-server-1.1.tar.gz:amora allisson:BADURL:Variable-Magic-0.34.tar.gz:perl-Variable-Magic amdunn:BADURL:coq-8.2pl1.tar.gz:coq anaconda-maint:BADURL:isomd5sum-1.0.5.tar.bz2:isomd5sum andriy:BAD_CVS_SOURCE:fmio-gq-wrapper.py:fmio anithra:BADSOURCE:com.ibm.systemtapgui.src.tar.gz:eclipse-systemtapgui asheesh:BADURL:liblicense-0.8.1.tar.gz:liblicense ashokdas:BADURL:elfinfo-1.1.tar.gz:elfinfo ashokdas:BADURL:greadelf-1.0.tar.gz:greadelf athimm:BAD_CVS_SOURCE:RiceBSD.doc:arpack athimm:BADURL:apt-0.5.15lorg3.95.git416.tar.bz2:apt athimm:BADURL:chrpath-0.13.tar.gz:chrpath athimm:BADURL:fakeroot_1.12.2.tar.gz:fakeroot athimm:BADURL:greylistd_0.8.7.tar.gz:greylistd athimm:BADURL:vtkdata-5.4.2.tar.gz:vtkdata atkac:BADURL:adns-python-1.2.1.tar.gz:python-adns atkac:BADURL:mtools-4.0.10.tar.bz2:mtools atkac:BADURL:rexec-1.5.tar.gz:rsh atkac:BADURL:swig-1.3.39.tar.gz:swig atkac:BADURL:xdelta-1.1.4.tar.gz:xdelta ausil:BADSOURCE:elftoaout-2.3.tgz:elftoaout ausil:BADSOURCE:silo-1.4.13.tar.bz2:silo ausil:BADURL:mysql-gui-tools-5.0r12.tar.gz:mysql-gui-tools ausil:BADURL:pam_yubico-2.1.tar.gz:pam_yubico ausil:BADURL:snort-2.8.3.2.tar.gz:snort ausil:BADURL:ykclient-2.3.tar.gz:ykclient awjb:BAD_CVS_SOURCE:winepulse-0.29-configure.ac.patch:wine awjb:BAD_CVS_SOURCE:wmweather+-2.9.tar.gz:wmweather+ awjb:BADSOURCE:libpolyxmass-0.9.1.tar.gz:libpolyxmass awjb:BADURL:dosbox-0.73.tar.gz:dosbox awjb:BADURL:freealut-1.1.0.tar.gz:freealut awjb:BADURL:httplib2-0.4.0.tar.gz:python-httplib2 awjb:BADURL:librra
Re: UTF-8 specfiles, better upstream tarball commits coming
Ville Skyttä (ville.sky...@iki.fi) said: I ran a few scripts on the CVS tree and will commit the resulting improvements in a few days to devel and rebuild changed packages if ACL's allow. Let me know if you for some reason don't want your packages touched (affected package lists below). If I may ask - is there a reason to do rebuilds? Given that there's no functional differences, isn't having the changes in CVS for the next rebuild 'good enough'? Packages that may have a better upstream tarball available: --- (not necessarily all of these will be touched) ... lzma ... I'd assume this would not be changed, for bootstrapping reasons. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
soname number bump for audit-libs
Hello, I wanted to let everyone know that I will be pushing audit-2.0 into rawhide in the next day or two. It will change the version number of libaudit. The following packages are known to have dependencies on audit-libs: repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps 'libaudit.so.0()(64bit)' | grep x86_64 cups-1:1.4-0.rc1.12.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-server-Xorg-0:1.6.99-28.20090804.fc12.x86_64 shadow-utils-2:4.1.4.1-6.fc12.x86_64 dbus-1:1.2.16-4.fc12.x86_64 cups-libs-1:1.4-0.rc1.12.fc12.x86_64 cups-lpd-1:1.4-0.rc1.12.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-server-Xvfb-0:1.6.99-28.20090804.fc12.x86_64 frysk-gnome-0:0.4-11.fc12.x86_64 readahead-1:1.4.9-3.fc12.x86_64 cronie-0:1.4-3.fc12.x86_64 util-linux-ng-0:2.16-3.fc12.x86_64 nscd-0:2.10.90-12.x86_64 xorg-x11-server-Xnest-0:1.6.99-28.20090804.fc12.x86_64 policycoreutils-newrole-0:2.0.68-1.fc12.x86_64 passwd-0:0.76-3.fc12.x86_64 gdm-1:2.27.4-4.fc12.x86_64 openssh-server-0:5.2p1-17.fc12.x86_64 anaconda-0:12.7-1.fc12.x86_64 sudo-0:1.7.1-5.fc12.x86_64 frysk-devel-0:0.4-11.fc12.x86_64 frysk-0:0.4-11.fc12.x86_64 xorg-x11-server-Xephyr-0:1.6.99-28.20090804.fc12.x86_64 upstart-0:0.3.11-2.fc12.x86_64 cups-php-1:1.4-0.rc1.12.fc12.x86_64 policycoreutils-0:2.0.68-1.fc12.x86_64 libxf86config-0:1.6.99-28.20090804.fc12.x86_64 ipsec-tools-0:0.7.2-3.fc12.x86_64 amtu-0:1.0.8-1.fc12.x86_64 pam-0:1.1.0-3.fc12.x86_64 aide-0:0.13.1-10.fc12.x86_64 rsh-server-0:0.17-55.fc12.x86_64 I can rebuild all these against the new audit package. If you would rather me not touch your package, just let me know. Thanks, -Steve -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: NetworkManager-novellvpn
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 11:07 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: Dan Williams d...@redhat.com writes: On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 11:11 -0300, Murilo Opsfelder Araujo wrote: Not that I know of. Despite repeated proddings of the Novell guys, they have never bothered to upstream the code. Second, is 'nvpn' even open-source? If it's not, it's pretty pointless to including a package in Fedora that is useless without a closed-source binary. 'nvpn' is a client or server? If server, they I wouldn't know about VPN which we support in Fedora even though we have no server part. It's a binary that the NetworkManager-novellvpn package executes to start the vpn connection. NM-novellvpn does not seem to include nvpn, so it must be some external program. See src/nm-novellvpn-service.c :: nm_novellvpn_start_novellvpn_binary(). I assume there's a novellvpn package in OpenSUSE somewhere. Obviously adding that package (if it's open-source) to Fedora would be a prerequisite to adding NetworkManager-novellvpn. Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: soname number bump for audit-libs
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:32 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: Hello, I wanted to let everyone know that I will be pushing audit-2.0 into rawhide in the next day or two. It will change the version number of libaudit. The following packages are known to have dependencies on audit-libs: I would strongly prefer that this wait until after the Alpha freeze is over. Otherwise we'll have a huge pile of things to track and tag should we need an updated build of anything on that list for an Alpha blocker. Anaconda being on that list makes this a very real possibility. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: non root X
On 08/07/2009 05:47 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 16:42 -0400, Casey Dahlin wrote: On 08/06/2009 01:26 AM, Dave Airlie wrote: On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 15:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi A few days back I ran into http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2009-July/001293.html I am wondering, since we are already using KMS in most places in Fedora, how far are we from achieving this by default in a Fedora release? non-root X is a big security hole at the moment, and until we get revoke() support in the kernel, we can probably move X to running as a special user, and maybe once we get revoke to running as the real user. However it doesn't solve the issue how we know we need or don't need root since X only figures out what graphics drivers are needed after starting, so if you needed a non-kms gpu driver we wouldn't know until after we'd started as non-root. Dave. Why can't we just start as root or with the setuid bit, and use the standard set*uid() calls to drop what we don't need once we know what we're doing? We have to undo some stuff when X exits. Dave. I meant start as setuid, then determine if root was necessary at all. If it is, keep running as root for the duration. If not, drop privileges. --CJD -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: soname number bump for audit-libs
On Monday 10 August 2009 12:41:48 pm Jesse Keating wrote: I wanted to let everyone know that I will be pushing audit-2.0 into rawhide in the next day or two. It will change the version number of libaudit. The following packages are known to have dependencies on audit-libs: I would strongly prefer that this wait until after the Alpha freeze is over. Otherwise we'll have a huge pile of things to track and tag should we need an updated build of anything on that list for an Alpha blocker. Anaconda being on that list makes this a very real possibility. OK, fine. I'll wait until after the Alpha freeze is over. -Steve -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: soname number bump for audit-libs
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:55 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: On Monday 10 August 2009 12:41:48 pm Jesse Keating wrote: I wanted to let everyone know that I will be pushing audit-2.0 into rawhide in the next day or two. It will change the version number of libaudit. The following packages are known to have dependencies on audit-libs: I would strongly prefer that this wait until after the Alpha freeze is over. Otherwise we'll have a huge pile of things to track and tag should we need an updated build of anything on that list for an Alpha blocker. Anaconda being on that list makes this a very real possibility. OK, fine. I'll wait until after the Alpha freeze is over. -Steve Even after that one has to wonder, why is a change like this going in after the feature freeze. How big of an ABI change is this, will there have to be any porting effort, what's the risk, what's the gain? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Ongoing effort to package JOSM
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Andrea Musuruanemusur...@gmail.com wrote: If I do that I get: [...] test: [junit] WARNING: multiple versions of ant detected in path for junit [junit] jar:file:/usr/share/java/ant-1.7.1.jar!/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.class [junit] and jar:file:/usr/share/java/ant.jar!/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.class [junit] Running com.drew.metadata.test.AllTests [junit] Tests run: 79, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,269 sec BUILD FAILED /home/andrea/devel/prg/metadata-extractor/build.xml:48: Test com.drew.metadata.test.AllTests failed Total time: 1 second Regards, Andrea. /usr/share/java/ant.jar is a symlink to /usr/share/java/ant-1.7.1.jar, so it is finding the same jar file twice. I don't know what to tell you to do now. You'll have to figure out how to make it not look at one or the other of the two names. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 10:15 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Many thanks Kevin for your report.
monnerat:BADURL:hkit-v0.5.tgz:php-hkit
I confirm the URL is OK:
Version:0.5
Source0:http://hkit.googlecode.com/files/hkit-v%{version}.tgz
-- Effective URL: http://hkit.googlecode.com/files/hkit-v0.5.tgz
Still valid and downloadable.
I thus suppose the server was not accessible at script run time.
Why not updating the script to log the exact failure reason and/or retry
transient connection failures after some delay? This would help everyone
finding the real problem, and limit the amount of false negatives and
overall line count growth you complain about :-)
Regards,
Patrick
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:07:46 +0200
Patrick MONNERAT p...@datasphere.ch wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 10:15 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Many thanks Kevin for your report.
No problem.
monnerat:BADURL:hkit-v0.5.tgz:php-hkit
I confirm the URL is OK:
Version:0.5
Source0:http://hkit.googlecode.com/files/hkit-v%{version}.tgz
-- Effective URL: http://hkit.googlecode.com/files/hkit-v0.5.tgz
Still valid and downloadable.
I thus suppose the server was not accessible at script run time.
Yeah, it seems so somehow.
Why not updating the script to log the exact failure reason and/or
retry transient connection failures after some delay? This would help
everyone finding the real problem, and limit the amount of false
negatives and overall line count growth you complain about :-)
Yes, it does log each download, I just haven't put those files up. ;)
I suppose I could so people could check them...
In this case:
--16:54:18-- http://hkit.googlecode.com/files/hkit-v0.5.tgz
Resolving hkit.googlecode.com... 209.85.225.82
Connecting to hkit.googlecode.com|209.85.225.82|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
16:54:19 ERROR 404: Not Found.
So, possibly a issue on googlecode having a outage?
Regards,
Patrick
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: soname number bump for audit-libs
On Monday 10 August 2009 01:04:32 pm Jesse Keating wrote: OK, fine. I'll wait until after the Alpha freeze is over. Even after that one has to wonder, why is a change like this going in after the feature freeze. It would have been in before feature freeze if sc-audit hadn't gotten stuck in package review. How big of an ABI change is this, will there have to be any porting effort, what's the risk, what's the gain? Should be little risk. This removes the old API needed for communicating with kernels before the 2.6.16 kernel was released. Somewhere around 2.6.22 libaudit made the old API hard to use. It was still there for anything linking to it. I have not looked in detail at all the packages on the dependency list but the changes only affect the audit rule setting interface and not the logging interface. Auditctl is likely to be the only program affected by the change, but to be safe and make sure nothing falls through the cracks, the number is bumped. Almost all apps are using the logging interface and are not affected. If anything actually is sending audit rules, the porting is trivial. You just use the _data equivalent function and use the audit_rule_data structure to hold your rules. The gain is that we want to clean up/deprecate the old kernel API somewhere around 2.6.36 and need user space to quit using it asap. -Steve -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Makefile target to download SourceX file
Does anyone have a Makefile target for download a SourceX file (similar to Kevin Fenzi's recent report)? This would have the added benefit of simplifying the update process for new versions (ex: make source NUM=0 instead of manually downloading the file). -Doug signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 11:15 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: --16:54:18-- http://hkit.googlecode.com/files/hkit-v0.5.tgz Resolving hkit.googlecode.com... 209.85.225.82 Connecting to hkit.googlecode.com|209.85.225.82|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 16:54:19 ERROR 404: Not Found. So, possibly a issue on googlecode having a outage? Argh ! This is not what I'm used to call a transient failure... but in this case, it is one :-( Everything is then possible with Google ! Anyway, retrying the failed BADURL cases after a while would probably reduce a bit your statistics... And yes, publishing the detailed failures as above is a great help. Thanks. Patrick -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: soname number bump for audit-libs
SG == Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com writes: SG It would have been in before feature freeze if sc-audit hadn't SG gotten stuck in package review. A couple of points here, since you seem to be blaming the review process for the lateness of this package: Submitting a new package request and expecting it to be reviewed in under a week is simply not reasonable. Sorry, it just isn't. If reviews are going to be blocked on package reviews, get those reviews in early, not at the last minute. If something important, like a new feature or something disruptive like this is going to be held up by a package review but needs to get done by feature or alpha freeze time, please make an announcement to that effect, or at least indicate that in the review itself. The review in question (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514602) said nothing about this issue. Otherwise the reviewers have no idea that they should prioritize this review. People go on vacation occasionally, or run out of free time. As far as I know, nobody is paid to review packages and we all have other work to do. If an important review gets blocked behind someone who is not responding, let someone know about it. I stole and finished the xz review because it turns out the person doing the review went on vacation and the entire mass rebuild was blocked on us getting xz in. Bottom line: We can get things done when we know about them needing to get done. - J -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Ongoing effort to package JOSM
2009/8/10 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Andrea Musuruanemusur...@gmail.com wrote: If I do that I get: [...] test: [junit] WARNING: multiple versions of ant detected in path for junit [junit] jar:file:/usr/share/java/ant-1.7.1.jar!/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.class [junit] and jar:file:/usr/share/java/ant.jar!/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.class [junit] Running com.drew.metadata.test.AllTests [junit] Tests run: 79, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,269 sec BUILD FAILED /home/andrea/devel/prg/metadata-extractor/build.xml:48: Test com.drew.metadata.test.AllTests failed Total time: 1 second Regards, Andrea. /usr/share/java/ant.jar is a symlink to /usr/share/java/ant-1.7.1.jar, so it is finding the same jar file twice. I don't know what to tell you to do now. You'll have to figure out how to make it not look at one or the other of the two names. That's just a warning, the error is due to bad coding in the test themselves; a workaround can be to let ant pass a correct locale to the jvm task, see the bug page for more details -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list -- Guido Grazioli guido.grazi...@gmail.com Via Parri 11 48011 - Alfonsine (RA) Mobile: +39 347 1017202 (10-18) Key FP = 7040 F398 0DED A737 7337 DAE1 12DC A698 5E81 2278 Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/guidograzioli -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: soname number bump for audit-libs
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 13:02 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Submitting a new package request and expecting it to be reviewed in under a week is simply not reasonable. Sorry, it just isn't. If reviews are going to be blocked on package reviews, get those reviews in early, not at the last minute. If something important, like a new feature or something disruptive like this is going to be held up by a package review but needs to get done by feature or alpha freeze time, please make an announcement to that effect, or at least indicate that in the review itself. The review in question (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514602) said nothing about this issue. Otherwise the reviewers have no idea that they should prioritize this review. Or line up a peer to do your review instead of just waiting for a volunteer to pick up the review. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Makefile target to download SourceX file
Doug Warner wrote: Does anyone have a Makefile target for download a SourceX file (similar to Kevin Fenzi's recent report)? This would have the added benefit of simplifying the update process for new versions (ex: make source NUM=0 instead of manually downloading the file). Would a make target be much simpler than using spectool -g foo.spec? It wouldn't take much to wrap that, if it would be helpful. -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ The nice thing about egotists is that they don't talk about other people. -- Lucille S. Harper pgpAxZGH9nnsl.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: soname number bump for audit-libs
On Monday 10 August 2009 02:02:47 pm Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: SG == Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com writes: SG It would have been in before feature freeze if sc-audit hadn't SG gotten stuck in package review. A couple of points here, since you seem to be blaming the review process for the lateness of this package: Submitting a new package request and expecting it to be reviewed in under a week is simply not reasonable. I was doing the package review and someone else took it from me. I knew the deadline and that we were splitting sc-audit into its own package during this release. The person that took the review from me seemed to be interested in it and Mirek created a new package real fast. There just wasn't follow up after the new package was created. I could have taken the package review back, I suppose. But I didn't want to seem rude. -Steve -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Makefile target to download SourceX file
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Doug Warner wrote: Does anyone have a Makefile target for download a SourceX file (similar to Kevin Fenzi's recent report)? This would have the added benefit of simplifying the update process for new versions (ex: make source NUM=0 instead of manually downloading the file). Would a make target be much simpler than using spectool -g foo.spec? It wouldn't take much to wrap that, if it would be helpful. I think he means to download from the look-aside cache, not from the upstream location, which might not exist for snapshot packages. I believe this would be useful too. Orcan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Makefile target to download SourceX file
On 08/10/2009 02:14 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Would a make target be much simpler than using spectool -g foo.spec? It wouldn't take much to wrap that, if it would be helpful. No, it wouldn't be. spectool is definitely what I was looking for, thanks! -Doug signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal
Ralf Corsepius wrote: I am applying this approach to several of my Fedora packages (some of which I know to suffer from such issues, e.g. Coin2), fixed some packages (owned by others) this way, which had failed during the F11-mass-rebuild, exactly because of such issues. I'd be pretty pissed off if you fixed one of my packages that way, instead of addressing the real issue (that rerunning the current autotools fails). Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: soname number bump for audit-libs
SG == Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com writes: SG I was doing the package review and someone else took it from me. You had it assigned to yourself with the fedora-review flag set? Looking at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_activity.cgi?id=514602, it seems that it was assigned to you but the flag was not set. I certainly would have asked before taking the review in that case; I can't say why Jochen didn't but you're certainly welcome to ask him. Were I you, I also would have just taken the review back, especially after Jochen failed to reply to the updated package in comment 5. - J -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Consistent PolicyKit system policy
Colin Walters wrote: An example of something that would be different between the RPM package and desktop spin is the policy for software installation. In the RPM package it should be either none allowed or initiate updates only, whereas the desktop spin would allow clickthrough for arbitrary RPM installation. (This is mainly relevant in the future when we don't have a separate root password in important places in the UI flow). The current policy is already safe for a shared lab. You cannot install software as a user who hasn't authenticated as root (for the purpose of sofware installation – PolicyKit rights are per task!) at least once. If, as the admin, you're installing software from a user's account, you can uncheck the box to remember authentication. And you cannot do anything which can really break something, e.g. removing packages, without authenticating as root EACH TIME. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal
On 08/10/2009 11:44 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: They are very easy to demonstrate. Commonly known cases are building gcc, binutils, gdb, firefox etc. Are these of the sort where a bug is reported, it's found that autotools made a bad decision, and then patching autotools fixed the problem? I'd like to read through such a bug report to learn more, if you can think of one easily. Other cases are pretty easy to find. Actually, probably almost any non-trivial, complex package has such issues. I don't _seem_ to have trouble rebuilding SRPM's (including some of the above cited) that I see are running autoconf. I'm curious to understand why or what I'm missing. -Bill -- Bill McGonigle, Owner BFC Computing, LLC http://bfccomputing.com/ Email, IM, VOIP: b...@bfccomputing.com Telephone: +1.603.448.4440 Twitter, etc.: bill_mcgonigle/bill.mcgonigle VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: UTF-8 specfiles, better upstream tarball commits coming
On Monday 10 August 2009, Bill Nottingham wrote: Ville Skyttä (ville.sky...@iki.fi) said: I ran a few scripts on the CVS tree and will commit the resulting improvements in a few days to devel and rebuild changed packages if ACL's allow. Let me know if you for some reason don't want your packages touched (affected package lists below). If I may ask - is there a reason to do rebuilds? Given that there's no functional differences, isn't having the changes in CVS for the next rebuild 'good enough'? I have some past experience in people accidentally/carelessly overwriting changes that have been in CVS only. Actually doing the builds was intended as an additional safeguard against that, as well as one for immediately catching problems I may have caused (there shouldn't be any, but I managed to create (and fix) one so far). But I'll resort to just tagging changes in CVS and doing builds as local or scratch ones for the remaining packages, hopefully that's enough. Packages that may have a better upstream tarball available: --- (not necessarily all of these will be touched) ... lzma ... I'd assume this would not be changed, for bootstrapping reasons. Yep, I considered that, but ended up including it in the list of possibly-to- be-touched packages for two reasons: there are already bootstrapping problems (coreutils, gzip, rpm etc etc and I'm not aware of documentation what are the expected issues/special cases that one should take care of when bootstrapping Fedora), and I think it's quite likely that rpm will start unpacking lzma tarballs with xz soon[0] so this wouldn't actually be a bootstrap problem much longer. But I'll take a 2nd look when I get this far. [0] http://rpm.org/ticket/85 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Kevin Fenzike...@scrye.com wrote: Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. musuruan:BADSOURCE:hatari-1.2.0.tar.bz2:hatari Thanks! URL changed. I'll updated it soon. musuruan:BADSOURCE:libicns-0.7.0.tar.gz:libicns This is valid. Temporary SF problem? Regards, Andrea. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
pygtk2 and its numpy dependency
pygtk2 implements a function called gtk.gdk.get_pixels_array(), which returns the pixel contents of a GDK pixbuf as a numpy array. Fine and dandy, but this means it links against numpy (7 megs) which is itself linked against atlas (12 megs). Kind of a lot for a single function, especially on a live image. Especially for a function that's basically unused! gnome-applet-music uses it to implement a poor-man's Porter-Duff blend, and that's the only caller currently packaged in Fedora, at least according to package deps. I have a patch (attached) that fixes that [1], which means we could compile our pygtk2 without numpy support and not break anything in Fedora proper. However, google codesearch does turn up what look like a few other users of that function, some of which we may actually want to ship someday. So we've got options: a) remove the explicit Requires: numpy from pygtk2, require apps that actually want this function to Require it themselves b) fake the numpy data type ABI in pygtk2 itself by cult-and-pasting it from numpy c) declare that get_pixels_array() just doesn't work in Fedora (historically true, back in like FC3) d) leave things as they are I lean towards a). I think b) is icky but doable, since that ABI is effectively unbreakable anyway (inherited from the older python-numeric module). The other two are way lame. Thoughts? [1] - Readers are invited to count the wtf's in the code being replaced, as well as in its callers. Don't treat it as a drinking game though. - ajax diff -up ./music-applet-2.5.1/src/musicapplet/applet.py.jx ./music-applet-2.5.1/src/musicapplet/applet.py --- ./music-applet-2.5.1/src/musicapplet/applet.py.jx 2009-08-10 15:03:29.0 -0400 +++ ./music-applet-2.5.1/src/musicapplet/applet.py 2009-08-10 15:03:36.0 -0400 @@ -831,22 +831,11 @@ class Rating (gtk.EventBox): def create_colorized_pixbuf (self, stock_pixbuf, color): -pixbuf = stock_pixbuf.copy () -red_scale = color.red / 65535.0 -green_scale = color.green / 65535.0 -blue_scale = color.blue / 65535.0 -for row in pixbuf.get_pixels_array (): -for pixel in row: -# Yay API changes! -if str (type (pixel[0])) == type 'array': -pixel[0][0] *= red_scale -pixel[1][0] *= green_scale -pixel[2][0] *= blue_scale -else: -pixel[0] *= red_scale -pixel[1] *= green_scale -pixel[2] *= blue_scale -return pixbuf + pixbuf = stock_pixbuf.composite_color_simple(stock_pixbuf.get_width(), + stock_pixbuf.get_height(), + gtk.gdk.INTERP_NEAREST, + 255, 1, color, color) + return pixbuf signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: pygtk2 and its numpy dependency
Adam Jackson wrote: pygtk2 implements a function called gtk.gdk.get_pixels_array(), which returns the pixel contents of a GDK pixbuf as a numpy array. Fine and dandy, but this means it links against numpy (7 megs) which is itself linked against atlas (12 megs). Kind of a lot for a single function, especially on a live image. Especially for a function that's basically unused! gnome-applet-music uses it to implement a poor-man's Porter-Duff blend, and that's the only caller currently packaged in Fedora, at least according to package deps. I have a patch (attached) that fixes that [1], which means we could compile our pygtk2 without numpy support and not break anything in Fedora proper. However, google codesearch does turn up what look like a few other users of that function, some of which we may actually want to ship someday. So we've got options: a) remove the explicit Requires: numpy from pygtk2, require apps that actually want this function to Require it themselves b) fake the numpy data type ABI in pygtk2 itself by cult-and-pasting it from numpy c) declare that get_pixels_array() just doesn't work in Fedora (historically true, back in like FC3) d) leave things as they are I lean towards a). I think b) is icky but doable, since that ABI is effectively unbreakable anyway (inherited from the older python-numeric module). The other two are way lame. Thoughts? [1] - Readers are invited to count the wtf's in the code being replaced, as well as in its callers. Don't treat it as a drinking game though. - ajax Since pygtk2 does actually use numpy, isn't d) the best (albeit most annoying) option? Full disclosure: Numpy maintainer. -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10
Hi, pbrobinson:BADURL:Journal-99.tar.bz2:sugar-journal I'm pretty sure this has been obsoleted and is a dead package but I'm in the process of confirming the status and will update as appropriate once I have confirmation. pbrobinson:BADURL:mojito-0.19.2.tar.bz2:mojito This is fixed in cvs and will go out with the next release. Cheers, Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Kevin Fenzike...@scrye.com wrote: snip maxamillion:BADURL:dc3dd-6.12.3.tar.gz:dc3dd maxamillion:BADURL:oggvideotools-0.7b.tar.gz:oggvideotools maxamillion:BADURL:shed-1.15.tar.gz:shed maxamillion:BADURL:TPG-3.1.2.tar.gz:python-tpg snip Mine are fixed and rawhide builds are complete. Many thanks for running the report. -Adam -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Review: Fedora 12 Alpha Release Notes
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 20:38 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi, Wit the Fedora 12 Alpha release coming up shortly, now would be a good time to review the release notes. Make sure the major features are covered, import bugs and workarounds noted etc http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Alpha_release_notes I'd actually prefer to keep bugs and workarounds noted in the Common Bugs page now, if that's OK with you. My plan since re-working the Common Bugs page for F11 has been to have the F12 page start with the Alpha release, and cover pre-release issues right up until the final release, then switch to covering final release issues. I'll try and put a bare-bones page framework up soon. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: pygtk2 and its numpy dependency
Hi, pygtk2 implements a function called gtk.gdk.get_pixels_array(), which returns the pixel contents of a GDK pixbuf as a numpy array. Fine and dandy, but this means it links against numpy (7 megs) which is itself linked against atlas (12 megs). Kind of a lot for a single function, especially on a live image. Especially for a function that's basically unused! gnome-applet-music uses it to implement a poor-man's Porter-Duff blend, and that's the only caller currently packaged in Fedora, at least according to package deps. I have a patch (attached) that fixes that [1], which means we could compile our pygtk2 without numpy support and not break anything in Fedora proper. However, google codesearch does turn up what look like a few other users of that function, some of which we may actually want to ship someday. So we've got options: a) remove the explicit Requires: numpy from pygtk2, require apps that actually want this function to Require it themselves b) fake the numpy data type ABI in pygtk2 itself by cult-and-pasting it from numpy c) declare that get_pixels_array() just doesn't work in Fedora (historically true, back in like FC3) d) leave things as they are I lean towards a). I think b) is icky but doable, since that ABI is effectively unbreakable anyway (inherited from the older python-numeric module). The other two are way lame. Thoughts? I know sugar use numpy and pygtk. They had forked pygtk packages with patches so that they could use the functionality in older releases. I'm not sure whether including adding numpy to the requires would work or not as I don't know the codebase. Peter [1] - Readers are invited to count the wtf's in the code being replaced, as well as in its callers. Don't treat it as a drinking game though. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2009-08-10
Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-10/fedora-meeting.2009-08-10-18.08.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-10/fedora-meeting.2009-08-10-18.08.txt Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2009-08-10/fedora-meeting.2009-08-10-18.08.log.html Meeting log --- * **roll call** (Oxf13-18:08:41_) * **old business** (Oxf13-18:14:50_) * **orphans (old business)** (Oxf13-18:15:37_) * *ACTION*: Oxf13 will send warning about recursively removing cryptix today (Oxf13-18:16:43_) * **critical path (old business)** (Oxf13-18:17:11_) * *LINK*: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=126049 (dgilmore-18:19:30_) * *ACTION*: Oxf13 will make sure the latest fedora-packager gets tagged for Alpha so that the tag-request make target can be used. (Oxf13-18:20:01_) * *ACTION*: lmacken still needs to report on critical path bodhi updates (Oxf13-18:20:46_) * **rpm changes (old business)** (Oxf13-18:21:15_) * *ACTION*: dgilmore will draft an SOP (with help) for managing RPM changes in rawhide (Oxf13-18:21:42_) * **no frozen rawhide (old business)** (Oxf13-18:21:56_) * **signing (old business)** (Oxf13-18:23:01_) * **Fedora 12 Alpha** (Oxf13-18:24:22_) * *AGREED*: A newer anaconda will be tagged today, even if it's known broken, to help with verifying other bug fixes. (Oxf13-18:35:09_) * *AGREED*: Slip alpha 1 week. Intend to slip final one week. Discuss schedule consequences at the planned release readiness meeting while using logistics list to gather feedback. (Oxf13-19:10:12_) * **open floor** (Oxf13-19:19:41_) * *ACTION*: Oxf13 will announce Alpha slip (Oxf13-19:20:44_) * *ACTION*: poelcat will announce intention to slip final and start discussion on logistics list to discuss impact of such slip. (Oxf13-19:21:47_) * *AGREED*: no need to vette the slip decision via FESCo (Oxf13-19:23:51_) * *ACTION*: Oxf13 to deliver F12 key ID to notting for mash configs (Oxf13-19:28:29_) -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal
On 08/10/2009 08:48 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Ralf Corsepius wrote: I am applying this approach to several of my Fedora packages (some of which I know to suffer from such issues, e.g. Coin2), fixed some packages (owned by others) this way, which had failed during the F11-mass-rebuild, exactly because of such issues. I'd be pretty pissed off if you fixed one of my packages that way, instead of addressing the real issue (that rerunning the current autotools fails). Thanks for providing evidence for you not having understood the problems. Also, thank you for you crossposting to a newgroup in replies list postings. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal
On 08/10/2009 09:01 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote: On 08/10/2009 11:44 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: They are very easy to demonstrate. Commonly known cases are building gcc, binutils, gdb, firefox etc. Are these of the sort where a bug is reported, it's found that autotools made a bad decision, and then patching autotools fixed the problem? Unlike some people around on this list, these tools' upstreams know how to use the autotools (I am active contributor to all of them): Use pregenerated files, do not run the autotools while building. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Slip of Fedora 12 Alpha by one week
Today in the release engineering meeting, it was decided to enact a one week slip of the Fedora 12 Alpha release date. This is due to remaining bugs on the F12Alpha tracker preventing creation of a release candidate and preventing testing of proposed fixes. We expect to be able to test/clear the list early this week, therefor only a week slip is needed at this time. The new Alpha release date August 25th. As soon as we have a successful Alpha compose we will lift the Alpha freeze and allow rawhide to move forward. We also agreed to adjust the final schedule based on Alpha slipping, however we are deferring that discussion to a later date, once we've successfully composed Fedora 12 Alpha. John Poelstra will send mail regarding this later. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list fedora-devel-annou...@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Consistent PolicyKit system policy
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 09:42 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: Generally where I'd like to move to is where the RPM package defaults are appropriate for a shared computer lab PC, and the desktop spin kickstart modifies things as appropriate for the unmanaged home PC/laptop. It would do this by writing to the appropriate files in /var/lib/PolicyKit-public/? We don't do this at all now though =) For your particular case I think your current policy is the best we can do for all targets. OK, good to know. Thanks. Tim. */ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 08/10/2009 09:01 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote: Are these of the sort where a bug is reported, it's found that autotools made a bad decision, and then patching autotools fixed the problem? Unlike some people around on this list, these tools' upstreams know how to use the autotools (I am active contributor to all of them): Use pregenerated files, do not run the autotools while building. Ralf And things like this make the autotools completely unattractive as a developer (to me at least). - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqAl5YACgkQiPi+MRHG3qSwgQCgjKugZQpLTmm6ONNWCUbg0ptU YRgAn0LDfIbEMmGkOJNV0yB84xdmzQDa =+4DF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: possible to file bug to change 32-bit DVD arch name from i386 to i686?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andre Robatino wrote: On 08/07/2009 08:26 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: yum also uses i386 for $basearch which causes (well, it's chicken-and-egg) repos to have i386 directories. These should also go with this update I imagine. Is it possible to do one without the other? It would be nice if the names of the ISOs could be changed now to reduce user confusion over whether it can install on their machine. Having an i386 basearch is probably less visible to most people. Both changes should be made eventually but people may be too busy right now to do both. I wrote should where I should have written could. Sorry for the confusion. In any case, both of these changes are probably best done at a major release and the earliest would be F13 at this point. - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqAl/oACgkQiPi+MRHG3qR4GQCeJwoJqWFpCl2xTg1FdUIWRdFL dyUAoKa9TMdnhZduMwzP7/419ZzB9gpg =gh9Q -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Fedora 12 Features Proposed for Removal
On 08/10/2009 11:56 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 08/10/2009 09:01 PM, Bill McGonigle wrote: Are these of the sort where a bug is reported, it's found that autotools made a bad decision, and then patching autotools fixed the problem? Unlike some people around on this list, these tools' upstreams know how to use the autotools (I am active contributor to all of them): Use pregenerated files, do not run the autotools while building. And things like this make the autotools completely unattractive as a developer (to me at least). Well, not all tools suite all needs. If you believe other tools better suite your needs, use them, if you feel like it. But if you use a tool (such as the autotools) you should learn to use them and to use them correctly. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: Consistent PolicyKit system policy
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 15:42, Colin Walters wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Tim Waugh wrote: What is the goal of the default Fedora PolicyKit policy system-wide, and how can we check that PolicyKit mechanisms' default policies are adhering to it? Generally where I'd like to move to is where the RPM package defaults are appropriate for a shared computer lab PC, and the desktop spin kickstart modifies things as appropriate for the unmanaged home PC/laptop. I'm confused, does this mean that the desktop spin doesn't (or won't) use the RPM package defaults? If so, what about someone who install a « shared computer lab PC » using the desktop spin? After all, users of this « shared lab PC » need a desktop, so the admin could think the desktop spin is the most appropriate... That seems confusing, and potentially misguiding :-/ Or did I simply not understand what you meant? Best regards, -- Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Switch from OpenAL to OpenAL-Soft
I have add the openal-soft package into fedora 12 that will replace openal. At all packager when you have openal as dependency please change it to openal-soft and recompile your package for f-12 please -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: midi seq interface vs. fc11: #505421
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 09:48 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Hi... anyone out there could help with the bugzilla bug 505421?? Filed on 2009-06-11, no answers of substance yet and no workaround suggested. Now at the 2009-08-10 mark... Should be easy, a module is not being loaded on demand, it was before. I keep getting questions about this on the Planet CCRMA list, it makes midi unusable for a normal user, anyone installing fc11 for audio _will_ stumble into this problem. It was working, it is broken, please fix it! Thanks Adam for writing a comment in the bug that agrees this issue should be fixed ASAP... Fully up to date fc11, trying again, problem still has not been fixed. Sigh. I _know_ the following is not going to get anything fixed, but will anyone left using midi in fedora have to wait till fc12? (ie: very basic stuff like this not being fixed means a bad initial experience for whoever tries the distro, usually meaning the trial install immediately following it is not going to be Fedora). -- Fernando -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 10:15 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: jkeating:BADSOURCE:email2trac.tar.gz:email2trac This has been fixed. Silly upstream doesn't version their tarball. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Reminder: fit and finish test day tomorrow
Just a quick reminder: We are meeting tomorrow in #fedora-fit-and-finish on freenode to test how well F12 works with phones, music players, cameras, usb sticks and other things you care to plug into your computer. See http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2009-08-04_Fit_and_Finish:Peripherals Live cds are available on that page now. See you tomorrow, Matthias -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: source file audit - 2009-08-10
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:24:01 +0300 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net wrote: Hi, On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:15:42AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. can one download this script somewhere to locally apply to one's packages and understand why the errors (maybe false positives) are shown? Thanks! Yes, it's in the same dir as the files: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/sourcecheck/sourcecheck Note that it's an ugly shell script. :) If someone wants to re-write it in python or something and tie it into the auto-qa efforts, feel free to do so. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.90, 1.91 pango.spec, 1.164, 1.165 sources, 1.91, 1.92
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27616
Modified Files:
.cvsignore pango.spec sources
Log Message:
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-1
- Update to 1.25.1
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.90
retrieving revision 1.91
diff -u -p -r1.90 -r1.91
--- .cvsignore 22 Jul 2009 16:27:07 - 1.90
+++ .cvsignore 10 Aug 2009 17:16:11 - 1.91
@@ -1 +1 @@
-pango-1.24.5.tar.bz2
+pango-1.25.1.tar.bz2
Index: pango.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.164
retrieving revision 1.165
diff -u -p -r1.164 -r1.165
--- pango.spec 22 Jul 2009 16:27:07 - 1.164
+++ pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 17:16:11 - 1.165
@@ -2,17 +2,17 @@
%define glib2_version %{glib2_base_version}-1
%define pkgconfig_version 0.12
%define freetype_version 2.1.3-3
-%define fontconfig_version 2.0
+%define fontconfig_version 2.7
%define cairo_version 1.7.6
%define libthai_version 0.1.9
Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
Name: pango
-Version: 1.24.5
+Version: 1.25.1
Release: 1%{?dist}
License: LGPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
-Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.24/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
+Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.25/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
URL: http://www.pango.org
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
@@ -225,6 +225,9 @@ fi
%changelog
+* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-1
+- Update to 1.25.1
+
* Wed Jul 22 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.24.5-1
- Update to 1.24.5
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.91
retrieving revision 1.92
diff -u -p -r1.91 -r1.92
--- sources 22 Jul 2009 16:27:07 - 1.91
+++ sources 10 Aug 2009 17:16:11 - 1.92
@@ -1 +1 @@
-815416a452e9172fed9862401f37 pango-1.24.5.tar.bz2
+3bf29f8ac93e87b8719795f703e6e97d pango-1.25.1.tar.bz2
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/pango/devel pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch, NONE, 1.1 pango.spec, 1.165, 1.166
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32507
Modified Files:
pango.spec
Added Files:
pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch
Log Message:
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-2
- Add pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch to fix build on x86-64
pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch:
Makefile.in |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- NEW FILE pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch ---
diff -up pango-1.25.1/pango/opentype/Makefile.in.no-hb-main
pango-1.25.1/pango/opentype/Makefile.in
--- pango-1.25.1/pango/opentype/Makefile.in.no-hb-main 2009-08-10
13:29:37.0 -0400
+++ pango-1.25.1/pango/opentype/Makefile.in 2009-08-10 13:29:14.0
-0400
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ PRE_UNINSTALL = :
POST_UNINSTALL = :
build_triplet = @build@
host_triplet = @host@
-noinst_PROGRAMS = main$(EXEEXT)
+#noinst_PROGRAMS = main$(EXEEXT)
subdir = pango/opentype
DIST_COMMON = README $(srcdir)/Makefile.am $(srcdir)/Makefile.in \
COPYING TODO
Index: pango.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.165
retrieving revision 1.166
diff -u -p -r1.165 -r1.166
--- pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 17:16:11 - 1.165
+++ pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 17:33:35 - 1.166
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
Name: pango
Version: 1.25.1
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
License: LGPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.25/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ BuildRequires: gtk-doc
# Look for pango.modules in an arch-specific directory
Patch0: pango-1.21.4-lib64.patch
+Patch1: pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch
%description
Pango is a library for laying out and rendering of text, with an emphasis
@@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ for the pango package.
%setup -q -n pango-%{version}
%patch0 -p1 -b .lib64
+%patch1 -p1 -b .no-hb-main
%build
@@ -225,6 +227,9 @@ fi
%changelog
+* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-2
+- Add pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch to fix build on x86-64
+
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-1
- Update to 1.25.1
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 104050] Apostrophes are not printed when using font 'Gentium' (wrong PS export)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 User ccheney changed the following: What|Old value |New value Ever confirmed| |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Additional comments from cche...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 10 17:42:08 + 2009 --- The full quote was this: The PostScript of the attached file is already somehow broken. When sending it unfiltered to an HP LaserJet 3390, the right quote does not appear on the printout, if one displays it with Ghostscript or sends it unfiltered to the HP LaserJet P3005 the right quote appears. If I look into the PostScript file itself, I see an embedded font, and it seems that not the whole font definition is embedded but only the glyphs needed for the file. And when I look closer to it all glyphs but the right quote are defined, the right quote is not defined. It seems that some PostScript interpreters (Ghostscript, LJ P3005) have a fallback for the missing character, others not (LJ 3390). So you are saying its not a bug in OOo to not embed the glyph needed in the postscript file? The fact that some postscript interpreters can work around the fact that OOo didn't embed the glyph doesn't make it not OOo's bug, or am I missing something important? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/pango/devel pango-1.25.1-cxx.patch, NONE, 1.1 pango.spec, 1.166, 1.167 pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch, 1.1, NONE
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8636
Modified Files:
pango.spec
Added Files:
pango-1.25.1-cxx.patch
Removed Files:
pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch
Log Message:
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-3
- Remove pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch
- Add pango-1.25.1-cxx.patch
- Hopefully builds this time
pango-1.25.1-cxx.patch:
Makefile.in |5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- NEW FILE pango-1.25.1-cxx.patch ---
diff -up pango-1.25.1/pango/opentype/Makefile.in.cxx
pango-1.25.1/pango/opentype/Makefile.in
--- pango-1.25.1/pango/opentype/Makefile.in.cxx 2009-08-10 13:58:16.0
-0400
+++ pango-1.25.1/pango/opentype/Makefile.in 2009-08-10 13:57:47.0
-0400
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ CCDEPMODE = @CCDEPMODE@
CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@
CPP = @CPP@
CPPFLAGS = @CPPFLAGS@
-CXX = $(CC) -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wabi -Wpadded -Wcast-align
+CXX = @CXX@
CXXCPP = @CXXCPP@
CXXDEPMODE = @CXXDEPMODE@
CXXFLAGS = @CXXFLAGS@
@@ -264,6 +264,9 @@ top_build_prefix = @top_build_prefix@
top_builddir = @top_builddir@
top_srcdir = @top_srcdir@
NULL =
+
+# The following warning options are useful for debugging: -Wpadded -Wcast-align
+AM_CXXFLAGS = -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions
noinst_LTLIBRARIES = libharfbuzz.la
HBSOURCES = \
hb-blob.c \
Index: pango.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.166
retrieving revision 1.167
diff -u -p -r1.166 -r1.167
--- pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 17:33:35 - 1.166
+++ pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 18:01:48 - 1.167
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
Name: pango
Version: 1.25.1
-Release: 2%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?dist}
License: LGPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.25/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ BuildRequires: gtk-doc
# Look for pango.modules in an arch-specific directory
Patch0: pango-1.21.4-lib64.patch
-Patch1: pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch
+Patch1: pango-1.25.1-cxx.patch
%description
Pango is a library for laying out and rendering of text, with an emphasis
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ for the pango package.
%setup -q -n pango-%{version}
%patch0 -p1 -b .lib64
-%patch1 -p1 -b .no-hb-main
+%patch1 -p1 -b .cxx
%build
@@ -227,6 +227,11 @@ fi
%changelog
+* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-3
+- Remove pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch
+- Add pango-1.25.1-cxx.patch
+- Hopefully builds this time
+
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-2
- Add pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch to fix build on x86-64
--- pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch DELETED ---
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/pango/devel pango.spec,1.167,1.168
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv25282
Modified Files:
pango.spec
Log Message:
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-4
- Remove -fexceptions from RPM_OPT_FLAGS
- Hopefully builds this time
Index: pango.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.167
retrieving revision 1.168
diff -u -p -r1.167 -r1.168
--- pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 18:01:48 - 1.167
+++ pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 19:13:56 - 1.168
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
Name: pango
Version: 1.25.1
-Release: 3%{?dist}
+Release: 4%{?dist}
License: LGPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.25/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
@@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ for the pango package.
%build
+# We try hard to not link to libstdc++, this flag doesn't help
+RPM_OPT_FLAGS=${RPM_OPT_FLAGS/-fexceptions/}
%configure --enable-gtk-doc --enable-doc-cross-references
--with-included-modules=basic-fc
make
@@ -227,6 +229,10 @@ fi
%changelog
+* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-4
+- Remove -fexceptions from RPM_OPT_FLAGS
+- Hopefully builds this time
+
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-3
- Remove pango-1.25.1-no-hb-main.patch
- Add pango-1.25.1-cxx.patch
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/pango/devel pango.spec,1.168,1.169
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27073
Modified Files:
pango.spec
Log Message:
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-5
- Remove -fexceptions from CXXFLAGS actually
- Hopefully builds this time
Index: pango.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.168
retrieving revision 1.169
diff -u -p -r1.168 -r1.169
--- pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 19:13:56 - 1.168
+++ pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 19:22:35 - 1.169
@@ -2,14 +2,14 @@
%define glib2_version %{glib2_base_version}-1
%define pkgconfig_version 0.12
%define freetype_version 2.1.3-3
-%define fontconfig_version 2.7
+%define fontconfig_version 2.6
%define cairo_version 1.7.6
%define libthai_version 0.1.9
Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
Name: pango
Version: 1.25.1
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
License: LGPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.25/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ for the pango package.
%build
# We try hard to not link to libstdc++, this flag doesn't help
-RPM_OPT_FLAGS=${RPM_OPT_FLAGS/-fexceptions/}
+CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS/-fexceptions/}
%configure --enable-gtk-doc --enable-doc-cross-references
--with-included-modules=basic-fc
make
@@ -229,6 +229,10 @@ fi
%changelog
+* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-5
+- Remove -fexceptions from CXXFLAGS actually
+- Hopefully builds this time
+
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-4
- Remove -fexceptions from RPM_OPT_FLAGS
- Hopefully builds this time
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/pango/devel pango.spec,1.169,1.170
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29201
Modified Files:
pango.spec
Log Message:
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-6
- One more try
Index: pango.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.169
retrieving revision 1.170
diff -u -p -r1.169 -r1.170
--- pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 19:22:35 - 1.169
+++ pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 19:31:43 - 1.170
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
Name: pango
Version: 1.25.1
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?dist}
License: LGPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.25/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
@@ -77,9 +77,8 @@ for the pango package.
%build
-# We try hard to not link to libstdc++, this flag doesn't help
-CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS/-fexceptions/}
-%configure --enable-gtk-doc --enable-doc-cross-references
--with-included-modules=basic-fc
+# We try hard to not link to libstdc++
+%configure --enable-gtk-doc --enable-doc-cross-references
--with-included-modules=basic-fc CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS/-fexceptions/}
make
%install
@@ -229,6 +228,9 @@ fi
%changelog
+* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-6
+- One more try
+
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-5
- Remove -fexceptions from CXXFLAGS actually
- Hopefully builds this time
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/pango/devel pango.spec,1.170,1.171
Author: behdad
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29605
Modified Files:
pango.spec
Log Message:
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-7
- Yes, I am stupid.
Index: pango.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.170
retrieving revision 1.171
diff -u -p -r1.170 -r1.171
--- pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 19:31:43 - 1.170
+++ pango.spec 10 Aug 2009 19:33:00 - 1.171
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text
Name: pango
Version: 1.25.1
-Release: 6%{?dist}
+Release: 7%{?dist}
License: LGPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.25/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ for the pango package.
%build
# We try hard to not link to libstdc++
-%configure --enable-gtk-doc --enable-doc-cross-references
--with-included-modules=basic-fc CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS/-fexceptions/}
+%configure --enable-gtk-doc --enable-doc-cross-references
--with-included-modules=basic-fc CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS/-fexceptions/}
make
%install
@@ -228,6 +228,9 @@ fi
%changelog
+* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-7
+- Yes, I am stupid.
+
* Mon Aug 10 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - 1.25.1-6
- One more try
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 104050] Apostrophes are not printed when using font 'Gentium' (wrong PS export)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 --- Additional comments from tillkamppe...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 10 20:57:46 + 2009 --- In my opinion it is an OOo bug, as there is actually a glyph missing in the OOo PostScript output. And as I have shown, not all PS interpreters have a fallback for such broken PostScript. And if there is a fallback, one cannot be sure that the replacement glyph coming from the printer/interpreter looks different to the one which was supposed to be provided by the document. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 104050] Apostrophes are not printed when using font 'Gentium' (wrong PS export)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 --- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 10 21:40:20 + 2009 --- @tillkamppeter: Thanx a lot for clarifying! can you please uplood odt and ps files here? Thank you! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 496795] UnDotum overrides Japanese desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496795 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-10 17:48:07 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.8.080608.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 104050] Apostrophes are not printed when using font 'Gentium' (wrong PS export)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 --- Additional comments from tillkamppe...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 10 21:54:42 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=64043) OOo-produced test file with incomplete font - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Issue 104050] Apostrophes are not printed when using font 'Gentium' (wrong PS export)
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=104050 --- Additional comments from tillkamppe...@openoffice.org Mon Aug 10 21:59:27 + 2009 --- Unfortunately, the submitter of the Ubuntu bug did not attach his original file which he has created with OpenOffice.org but only the PostScript output of OOo and of Abiword, both done from the same input file. The PostScript files are attached. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(gabur...@cs.umd.e | |du) | --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-08-10 19:27:59 EDT --- No response; closing as promised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/mathml-fonts/devel dead.package, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.5, NONE find_symbol_font.sh, 1.3, NONE mathml-fonts.spec, 1.17, NONE sources, 1.5, NONE
Author: rdieter Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/mathml-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14682 Added Files: dead.package Removed Files: .cvsignore find_symbol_font.sh mathml-fonts.spec sources Log Message: EOL'd by lyx (lyx-fonts-compat) --- NEW FILE dead.package --- EOL'd by lyx (lyx-fonts-compat) --- .cvsignore DELETED --- --- find_symbol_font.sh DELETED --- --- mathml-fonts.spec DELETED --- --- sources DELETED --- ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 508899] Monospace no more
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508899 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fonts-ISO8859-2/devel fonts-ISO8859-2.spec,1.18,1.19
Author: pnemade
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-ISO8859-2/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19009
Modified Files:
fonts-ISO8859-2.spec
Log Message:
* Tue Aug 11 2009 Parag pnem...@redhat.com - 1.0-22
- Fixed for Source Audit 2009-08-10
Index: fonts-ISO8859-2.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-ISO8859-2/devel/fonts-ISO8859-2.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -p -r1.18 -r1.19
--- fonts-ISO8859-2.spec24 Jul 2009 23:00:10 - 1.18
+++ fonts-ISO8859-2.spec11 Aug 2009 04:04:02 - 1.19
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
-%define include_ulT1mo 0
-
%define ISONAME ISO8859-2
%define __mkfontdir umask 133;mkfontdir
@@ -9,12 +7,10 @@
Name: fonts-%{ISONAME}
Version: 1.0
-Release: 21%{?dist}
+Release: 22%{?dist}
License: MIT
-Source: http://www.biz.net.pl/images/ISO8859-2-bdf.tar.gz
-%if %{include_ulT1mo}
-Source1: http://www.intersoft.cz/linux/fonts/ulT1mo-beta-1.0.tar.gz
-%endif
+# Upstream url http://www.biz.net.pl/images/ISO8859-2-bdf.tar.gz is dead now.
+Source: ISO8859-2-bdf.tar.gz
Patch0: XFree86-ISO8859-2-1.0-redhat.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
@@ -66,43 +62,24 @@ were taken from the Internet or CDs.
%prep
-%if %{include_ulT1mo}
-%setup -c -q -a 1
-%else
%setup -c -q
-%endif
%patch0 -p1 -b .redhat
%build
make all
-%if %{include_ulT1mo}
-make all -C ulT1mo-beta-1.0
-%endif
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
DSTFONT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}
make install PREFIX=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT \
FONTDIR=$DSTFONT
-%if %{include_ulT1mo}
-mkdir -p $DSTFONT/Type1/{afm,pfm}
-(
- cd ulT1mo-beta-1.0 ;
- install -m 644 *.pfb fonts.{alias,dir,scale} $DSTFONT/Type1
- install -m 644 afm/*.afm $DSTFONT/Type1/afm
- install -m 644 pfm/*.pfm $DSTFONT/Type1/pfm
-)
-%endif
# Install catalogue symlink
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}
ln -sf %{fontdir}/misc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/fonts-ISO8859-2
ln -sf %{fontdir}/75dpi $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi
ln -sf %{fontdir}/100dpi $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi
-%if %{include_ulT1mo}
-ln -sf %{fontdir}/Type1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{catalogue}/fonts-ISO8859-2-Type1
-%endif
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
@@ -122,12 +99,6 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%__mkfontdir /usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}/100dpi
} /dev/null || :
-%if %{include_ulT1mo}
-%post Type1
-{
-%__mkfontdir /usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}/Type1
-} /dev/null || :
-%endif
%files
%defattr(-,root,root)
@@ -158,23 +129,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%dir %{catalogue}
%{catalogue}/fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi
-%if %{include_ulT1mo}
-%files Type1
-%defattr(-,root,root)
-%dir /usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}/Type1
-%dir /usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}/Type1/afm
-%dir /usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}/Type1/pfm
-/usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}/Type1/afm/*
-/usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}/Type1/*.pfb
-/usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}/Type1/pfm/*
-%config(noreplace) %verify(not md5 size mtime)
/usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}/Type1/fonts.alias
-%verify(not md5 size mtime) /usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}/Type1/fonts.scale
-%ghost %verify(not md5 size mtime) /usr/share/fonts/%{ISONAME}/Type1/fonts.dir
-%dir %{catalogue}
-%{catalogue}/fonts-ISO8859-2-Type1
-%endif
-
%changelog
+* Tue Aug 11 2009 Parag pnem...@redhat.com - 1.0-22
+- Fixed for Source Audit 2009-08-10
+
* Fri Jul 24 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.0-21
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/fonts-ISO8859-2/devel fonts-ISO8859-2.spec,1.19,1.20
Author: pnemade
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-ISO8859-2/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20062
Modified Files:
fonts-ISO8859-2.spec
Log Message:
- Remove long time unspported option include_ulT1mo
Index: fonts-ISO8859-2.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fonts-ISO8859-2/devel/fonts-ISO8859-2.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -p -r1.19 -r1.20
--- fonts-ISO8859-2.spec11 Aug 2009 04:04:02 - 1.19
+++ fonts-ISO8859-2.spec11 Aug 2009 04:06:15 - 1.20
@@ -47,19 +47,6 @@ Requires: mkfontdir
This package includes Central European (ISO8859-2) fonts, in 100 dpi
resolution, for the X Window System.
-%if %{include_ulT1mo}
-%package Type1
-Group: User Interface/X
-Summary: Type 1 scalable Central European language (ISO8859-2) fonts for X.
-Requires: mkfontdir
-
-%description Type1
-This package contains Central European Type 1 fonts for the X Window System.
-This set of fonts is known as the ulT1mo (or ultimo) collection. All of the
-included fonts are copyrighted to their authors and freeware. Original fonts
-were taken from the Internet or CDs.
-%endif
-
%prep
%setup -c -q
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/lohit-fonts/devel lohit-fonts.spec,1.15,1.16
Author: pravins
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30542
Modified Files:
lohit-fonts.spec
Log Message:
* Tue Aug 11 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.0-3
- updated source url
Index: lohit-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/lohit-fonts/devel/lohit-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16
--- lohit-fonts.spec4 Aug 2009 06:49:40 - 1.15
+++ lohit-fonts.spec11 Aug 2009 04:49:17 - 1.16
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ Languages.
Name: %{fontname}-fonts
Version:2.4.0
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:Free Indian truetype/opentype fonts
Group: User Interface/X
License:GPLv2
URL:https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/
-Source:
http://rbhalera.fedorapeople.org/released/lohit/lohit-fonts-%{version}.tar.gz
+Source:
http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/lohit/lohit-fonts-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
@@ -267,6 +267,9 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}
%changelog
+* Tue Aug 11 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.0-3
+- updated source url
+
* Tue Aug 04 2009 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com - 2.4.0-2
- updated summary for Hindi font package bug 514443
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 514443] [hi_IN] Summary need to Update |wrong language name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514443 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 483391] [te_IN] New Telugu codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483391 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
F-I freeze!
It's that time of the year again! The alpha will be out in two weeks from tomorrow and that means we'll be frozen tomorrow. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/SOP/Release#Change_Freeze This is a pre-release freeze. We have gotten the OK from release engineering to go ahead with our planed kernel update this Thursday (thanks smooge) Let me know if you have any questions. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 compil ed from source will not boot
Dear list, There is something seriously wrong with this kernel release. It compiles - but will not boot all the way. It hangs somewhere. I even tried to boot into single user mode. I never get to the shell prompt when booting in single user mode, nor to the gnome login banner when letting it boot in multiuser mode. After some 30-45 minutes I Ctrl-Alt_Del and the kernel pops the message Stopping all md devices .. and the pc reboots. I did not have this problem with these kernels 2.6.29.6-213.fc11 2.6.29.5-191.fc11 Are there others who have tried to build 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 from source rpm and configured the kernel in any way before building? Did you see any errors when running make modules_install as I did? Did the resulting kernel boot up all the way? If you need more info, please let me know. Cheers, Markus K. _ Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=PID23384::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:NF_BR_sync:082009 ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Re: kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 compile d from source will not boot
2009/8/10 Markus Kesaromous remotes...@live.com: Dear list, There is something seriously wrong with this kernel release. It compiles - but will not boot all the way. It hangs somewhere. I even tried to boot into single user mode. I never get to the shell prompt when booting in single user mode, nor to the gnome login banner when letting it boot in multiuser mode. After some 30-45 minutes I Ctrl-Alt_Del and the kernel pops the message Stopping all md devices .. and the pc reboots. I did not have this problem with these kernels 2.6.29.6-213.fc11 2.6.29.5-191.fc11 Are there others who have tried to build 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 from source rpm and configured the kernel in any way before building? Did you see any errors when running make modules_install as I did? Did the resulting kernel boot up all the way? If you need more info, please let me know. The main piece of information you appear to have missed off is the modifications you have made in your build. I would suggest the following for further reading: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/CustomKernel http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelCommonProblems Regards -- Christopher Brown ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
RE: kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 compiled from source will not boot
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:41:52AM, Christopher Brown wrote: Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:41:52 +0100 From: snecklif...@gmail.com To: remotes...@live.com CC: fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 compiled from source will not boot 2009/8/10 Markus Kesaromous : Dear list, There is something seriously wrong with this kernel release. It compiles - but will not boot all the way. It hangs somewhere. I even tried to boot into single user mode. I never get to the shell prompt when booting in single user mode, nor to the gnome login banner when letting it boot in multiuser mode. After some 30-45 minutes I Ctrl-Alt_Del and the kernel pops the message Stopping all md devices .. and the pc reboots. I did not have this problem with these kernels 2.6.29.6-213.fc11 2.6.29.5-191.fc11 Are there others who have tried to build 2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11 from source rpm and configured the kernel in any way before building? Did you see any errors when running make modules_install as I did? Did the resulting kernel boot up all the way? If you need more info, please let me know. The main piece of information you appear to have missed off is the modifications you have made in your build. I would suggest the following for further reading: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/CustomKernel http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelCommonProblems Regards -- Christopher Brown Thank you Christopher. The steps to build the kernel at URL http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/CustomKernel were exactly what I needed. I was not aware of this document before. The only thing extra I had to do was to untar linux-2.6.29.tar.bz2 and fix drivers/staging/rt2860/config.mk, and then re-tar. Guess I should have created a patch, and should have added that patch to the spec file. But, since this is only one-off, I did not see the need for it. I am sure there will be yet another kernel update for whic I will have to repeat this whole process. What a pain in the neck! If I had known that the Atheros 9K series of mini-pci cards were supported natively, I would not have bought the Ralink 2860 card. Thanx again for your help. Cheers, Markus _ Get back to school stuff for them and cashback for you. http://www.bing.com/cashback?form=MSHYCBpubl=WLHMTAGcrea=TEXT_MSHYCB_BackToSchool_Cashback_BTSCashback_1x1 ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
Using short hostnames with dig (was: Re: Problems getting bind working on F11)
Tim wrote: I've never gotten dig to work with short hostnames, it seems to work at a lower level than other things which will add on the domain names you put in the search parameter in /etc/resolv.conf. By default, dig doesn't use the search list from /etc/resolv.conf. But you can use the +search option from the command line or in ~/.digrc to enable this behavior. -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ There is no pleasure in having nothing to do; the fun is in having lots to do and not doing it. -- Mary Wilson Little pgpWlfMjpF6Ve.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [OT?] Web looks slow
On Sat, August 8, 2009 7:00 pm, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: Web access has been really s.l.o.w since the last upgrade to Firefox (to Firefox-3.5.2). It looks like a web issue, maybe related to the Twitter denial of service attacks, or maybe to changes to service by my ISP. Or maybe it's a Fedora or Firefox issue. Has anyone else noticed this? jon Yes, I noticed a significant decrease in some websites and even my own are now sluggish. I was hoping this was my cable service. Kevin -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Problems getting bind working on F11
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 23:09 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
These all yield the same REFUSED response.
I missed seeing this in your named.conf file:
allow-query { localhost; };
I think that's the only thing standing in your way, now.
I can't remember if it can actually be a hostname (doesn't sound a
clever idea, how would it work if the name server can't resolve the
name), or has to be a name of an ACL rule. On my server, it's a ACL
rule name.
allow-query { lan; };
acl lan {
192.168/16;
127.0.0.1;
};
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Problems getting bind working on F11
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 16:12 +0930, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-09 at 23:09 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
These all yield the same REFUSED response.
I missed seeing this in your named.conf file:
allow-query { localhost; };
I think that's the only thing standing in your way, now.
Yup, that was it.
I added localnets to this list and it seems to have done the trick.
Thanks very much for your help.
--
Braden McDaniel bra...@endoframe.com
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Intel 915/945GM
Hello all, My laptop has FC11 x86_64 and: (--) PCI:*(0:0:2:0) 8086:27a2:1028:01c2 Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller rev 3, Mem @ 0xeff0/524288, 0xd000/268435456, 0xefec/262144, I/O @ 0xeff8/8, BIOS @ 0x/131072 (II) intel: Driver for Intel Integrated Graphics Chipsets: i810, Mobile Intel® GM45 Express Chipset, Intel Integrated Graphics Device, G45/G43, Q45/Q43, G41 (II) intel(0): Integrated Graphics Chipset: Intel(R) 945GM (==) intel(0): Intel XvMC decoder disabled 3D is problematic. Google Earth for example is slugish. My xorg.conf is the default from first boot. Should I do something specific to make 3D apps run efficiently. I keep on searching in Google that there are problems with intel drivers, but I do not understand what specificaly I should do. Thank you All for any help. Theophanis Kontogiannis -- This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=362214topic_id=75078forum=10#forumpost362214 If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmas...@fcp.surfsite.org and/or blame theophanis_kontogian...@yahoo.gr. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Recovering from a hard X lock up
Hi, My Fedora 10 machine locks up X completely, but I can still login via SSH. The monitor still shows the X window, but nothing changes, no clock, mouse nothing. X processes are still running, but not sure how to go about shutting them down. Last night, I tried to get the system to shut down sanely by running shutdown -h now and although the command ran and I couldn't login via ssh anymore, the machine did not shut down. Can anyone tell me how to shutdown and restart X properly. Tried things like startx( had a x lock file exists error) and init 3, but nothing worked. Thanks! James -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Recovering from a hard X lock up
James Allsopp wrote: Hi, My Fedora 10 machine locks up X completely, but I can still login via SSH. The monitor still shows the X window, but nothing changes, no clock, mouse nothing. X processes are still running, but not sure how to go about shutting them down. Last night, I tried to get the system to shut down sanely by running shutdown -h now and although the command ran and I couldn't login via ssh anymore, the machine did not shut down. Can anyone tell me how to shutdown and restart X properly. Tried things like startx( had a x lock file exists error) and init 3, but nothing worked. Does capslock still change the LED status? If not, bad sign. You can use the ps auxww command to see the PID of the X process and then kill PID or, more strongly, kill -9 PID. (equivalenty, killall X and killall -9 X). Killing X will kill all the graphical applications and start X again if you are in runlevel 5. But, as you said that init 3 failed to shut down X, I'm afraid the hardware is left in a state where recovery is not possible. (FYI, startx -- :1 would have tried to start a second X instance, bypassing the existing lock) Best regards. -- Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Problem with nautilus and smb:// links
Hello all, I have FC11 with gvfs-smb-1.2.3-10.fc11.x86_64 In the past I could browse with Nautilus to the SMB export of our windows 2003 server, browse through it, and double click any file and open it. The export includes names of folders or files in Greek. One export in question is the following: x...@xx.yy.zz.vv/001.Technical%20Department/300.Security%20and%20Fraud%20Management/002.Information%20Base/04.%20Authorities/01.Άρσεις-Απορρήτου [1] target=_blanksmb://corp;x...@xx.yy.zz.vv/001.Technical%20Department/300.Security%20and%20Fraud%20Management/002.Information%20Base/04.%20Authorities/01.Άρσεις-Απορρήτου [2] Now (and I suspect right after upgrading from gvfs-smb-1.2.3-8.fc11.x86_64 to gvfs-smb.x86_64 1.2.3-9.fc11 - and then to 1.2.3-10) I can access all the folders BUT, whenever I double click on file but the file (any file, anywere in the structure of directories), never opens. Possible errors: If the file is an open office file, the filter selection appears. If the file is .pdf then the document viewer reports for example: Loading document from xx...@xx.yy.zz.yy/001.Technical%20Department/300.Security%20and%20Fraud%20Management/002.Information%20Base/04.%20Authorities/01.%CE%86%CF%81%CF%83%CE%B5%CE%B9%CF%82-%CE%91%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%81%CF%81%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%85/%CE%94%CE%91%CE%A0-%CE%91%CE%9119%202009-04-24/%CE%95%CE%A0%CE%99%CE%94%CE%9F%CE%A3%CE%97.pdf [3] target=_blanksmb://corp;xx...@xx.yy.zz.yy/001.Technical%20Department/300.Security%20and%20Fraud%20Management/002.Information%20Base/04.%20Authorities/01.%CE%86%CF%81%CF%83%CE%B5%CE%B9%CF%82-%CE%91%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%81%CF%81%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%85/%CE%94%CE%91%CE%A0-%CE%91%CE%9119%202009-04-24/%CE%95%CE%A0%CE%99%CE%94%CE%9F%CE%A3%CE%97.pdf [4] and stalls at 99%. Any help on that? Thank you All for your time, Theophanis Kontogiannis Links: -- [1] smb://corp;a href= [2] mailto:x...@xx.yy.zz.vv/001.Technical%20Department/300.Security%20and%20Fraud%20Management/002.Information%20Base/04.%20Authorities/01.Άρσεις-Απορρήτου [3] smb://corp;a href= [4] mailto:xx...@xx.yy.zz.yy/001.Technical%20Department/300.Security%20and%20Fraud%20Management/002.Information%20Base/04.%20Authorities/01.%CE%86%CF%81%CF%83%CE%B5%CE%B9%CF%82-%CE%91%CF%80%CE%BF%CF%81%CF%81%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%BF%CF%85/%CE%94%CE%91%CE%A0-%CE%91%CE%9119%202009-04-24/%CE%95%CE%A0%CE%99%CE%94%CE%9F%CE%A3%CE%97.pdf -- This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=362270topic_id=75134forum=10#forumpost362270 If you think, this is spam, please report this to webmas...@fcp.surfsite.org and/or blame theophanis_kontogian...@yahoo.gr. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Recovering from a hard X lock up
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 10:39 +0100, James Allsopp wrote: My Fedora 10 machine locks up X completely, but I can still login via SSH. The monitor still shows the X window, but nothing changes, no clock, mouse nothing. X processes are still running, but not sure how to go about shutting them down. Last night, I tried to get the system to shut down sanely by running shutdown -h now and although the command ran and I couldn't login via ssh anymore, the machine did not shut down. Can anyone tell me how to shutdown and restart X properly. Tried things like startx( had a x lock file exists error) and init 3, but nothing worked. If X hadn't completely locked up, CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE would have restarted X (that is BACKSPACE, the delete key that deletes to the left, not the DEL key that deletes to the right). If the keyboard was still being listened to, then CTRL+ALT+DEL should have rebooted (perhaps after hammering away at the keys a lot), as a second option instead of CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE. If the keyboard was still being listened to, and you'd enabled the magic keys (darn, I've forgotten the proper terms for making use of the SYS REQ keys), you would have had more options about wresting control back. But that requires you to know what you're doing. However, it sounds like you've almost got the machine to shutdown, but not quite, and left yourself in a state with way to control it any more. You could try CTRL+ALT+DEL, or maybe CTRL+ALT+F2 to see if you can get to a local console, then CTRL+ALT+DEL, repeatedly until something quits and lets it continue to shutdown. But you might well be stuck with having to just turn off the power. Are you avoiding that out of cautiousness, or are you hoping to recover something that might get trashed if you pull the power? I've found Linux to be quite resilient to not destroying itself if the power is rudely switched off. Heck, way back with Fedora Core 4, we once tried turning the power off repeatedly, at inopportune moments, to see if we could give it problems. No problems were detected. I've found one or two machines that will occasionally start to shutdown, then just sit there stuck part way through the process. Holding down CTRL+ALT and repeatedly hitting DEL usually whips them into shape, forcing some stubborn thing to quit, so the computer can continue shutting down. It's always something that happens just as I want to nip out, so I don't have the time to diagnose which part of the shutdown process has got stuck. -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Recovering from a hard X lock up
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:39 AM, Tim wrote: On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 10:39 +0100, James Allsopp wrote: My Fedora 10 machine locks up X completely, but I can still login via SSH. The monitor still shows the X window, but nothing changes, no clock, mouse nothing. X processes are still running, but not sure how to go about shutting them down. Last night, I tried to get the system to shut down sanely by running shutdown -h now and although the command ran and I couldn't login via ssh anymore, the machine did not shut down. Can anyone tell me how to shutdown and restart X properly. Tried things like startx( had a x lock file exists error) and init 3, but nothing worked. If X hadn't completely locked up, CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE would have restarted X (that is BACKSPACE, the delete key that deletes to the left, not the DEL key that deletes to the right). If the keyboard was still being listened to, then CTRL+ALT+DEL should have rebooted (perhaps after hammering away at the keys a lot), as a second option instead of CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE. snip I've seen similar symptoms ... for me, the keyboard is usually dead I think, so any recovery procedure would have to be done remotely through an ssh session. I'm not sure if it's a valid way to tell for sure, but I usually try the caps lock/num lock to see if the little lights toggle to see if the keyboard is dead. Whenever they don't toggle, control-alt-* hasn't worked for me. Even the sys rq REISUB trick did nothing. I've never tried unplugging the USB keyboard and plugging it back in... I wonder if that could help recover the keyboard. Even if control-alt-backspace did work, my understanding was that it was disabled by default in f11, but the poster was running f10, so that's not his problem. Regards, David -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Samba trying to read /var/www and /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc
I'm constantly getting SELinux messages about smbd trying to access the subject directories: SELinux is preventing smbd (smbd_t) search to /var/www (httpd_sys_content_t). SELinux is preventing samba (smbd) getattr to /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc (binfmt_misc_fs_t). AFAICT, my smb.conf (attached) doesn't contain any reference to either of these directories. Any idea what's going on/how I can stop it? Thanks! -- Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too # many!) most of which are not shown in this example # # For a step to step guide on installing, configuring and using samba, # read the Samba-HOWTO-Collection. This may be obtained from: # http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf # # Many working examples of smb.conf files can be found in the # Samba-Guide which is generated daily and can be downloaded from: # http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-Guide.pdf # # Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) # is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # # for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you # may wish to enable # # NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command testparm # to check that you have not made any basic syntactic errors. # #--- # SELINUX NOTES: # # If you want to use the useradd/groupadd family of binaries please run: # setsebool -P samba_domain_controller on # # If you want to share home directories via samba please run: # setsebool -P samba_enable_home_dirs on # # If you create a new directory you want to share you should mark it as # samba-share_t so that selinux will let you write into it. # Make sure not to do that on system directories as they may already have # been marked with othe SELinux labels. # # Use ls -ldZ /path to see which context a directory has # # Set labels only on directories you created! # To set a label use the following: chcon -t samba_share_t /path # # If you need to share a system created directory you can use one of the # following (read-only/read-write): # setsebool -P samba_export_all_ro on # or # setsebool -P samba_export_all_rw on # # If you want to run scripts (preexec/root prexec/print command/...) please # put them into the /var/lib/samba/scripts directory so that smbd will be # allowed to run them. # Make sure you COPY them and not MOVE them so that the right SELinux context # is applied, to check all is ok use restorecon -R -v /var/lib/samba/scripts # #-- # #=== Global Settings = [global] # --- Netwrok Related Options - # # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name, eg: MIDEARTH # # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field # # netbios name can be used to specify a server name not tied to the hostname # # Interfaces lets you configure Samba to use multiple interfaces # If you have multiple network interfaces then you can list the ones # you want to listen on (never omit localhost) # # Hosts Allow/Hosts Deny lets you restrict who can connect, and you can # specifiy it as a per share option as well # workgroup = PILCHERS server string = Samba Server Version %v ; netbios name = MYSERVER ; interfaces = lo eth0 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 ; hosts allow = 127. 192.168.12. 192.168.13. # --- Logging Options - # # Log File let you specify where to put logs and how to split them up. # # Max Log Size let you specify the max size log files should reach # logs split per machine log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m # max 50KB per log file, then rotate max log size = 50 # --- Standalone Server Options # # Scurity can be set to user, share(deprecated) or server(deprecated) # # Backend to store user information in. New installations should # use either tdbsam or ldapsam. smbpasswd is available for backwards # compatibility. tdbsam requires no further configuration. security = user passdb backend = tdbsam # --- Domain Members Options # # Security must be set to domain or ads # # Use the realm option only with security = ads # Specifies the Active Directory realm the host is part of # # Backend to store user information in. New installations should # use either tdbsam or ldapsam. smbpasswd is available for backwards # compatibility. tdbsam requires no further configuration. # # Use password server option only with security = server or if
FC 11 Boot mode single user [recovery password]
Dear, I need recovery password in FC 11. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
