Volker Stolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > Hi, I'm looking for a way of comparing Ptrs to null *elegantly*. > The FFI distinguishes between 'Ptr a' and 'FunPtr a', so testing > would mean writing ((==) null[Fun]Ptr). This is rather tedious and a predicate > 'isNull' might be in order so that it's possible to write > > when (isNull p) $ ... > or > throwIOErrorIf isNull ... > , especially without having to worry about comparing against the correct > null pointer (FunPtr or Ptr). That's something where a class can help, but > I'm not sure whether such a specialised class is desired...
An isNullPtr was proposed before and rejected; see the corresponding thread in the archive of this list. Mainly on the grounds that people didn't consider ((==) null[Fun]Ptr) to be tedious to write. Besides, I really don't want to make any changes for version 1.0 of the spec anymore; except finish up the finalizer/Foreign{Ptr,Proxy} story. Further convenience functions can go into extra libraries (there is no need to stick them all in the base spec). Cheers, Manuel _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi