Re: [Fink-beginners] Re: Problems installing gtkglext1
Le 9 sept. 04, à 22:11, Daniel E. Macks a écrit : Gamal Akabani [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Dear Fink Users: I am having a problem trying to install gtkglext1 and gtkglext1-shlibs. I get the following response when I try to install the packages. [...] Failed: compiling gtkglext1-1.0.5-11 failed That appears to be a pretty old gtkglext1 package: http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/gtkglext1 In addition to the verison update, I think there were some dependency problems that got fixed along the way. Please update your package descriptions and try again. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php ___ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php ___ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
Re: [Fink-beginners] Binary update-all option?
Re: [Fink-beginners] Binary update-all option? or How do I keep from wasting time building from source when the binary is available? Derek, I checked my notes and the way I figured out to make sure I had the binaries when they are available was to use the following: date; nice fink scanpackages; nice fink index; nice apt-get update; nice apt-get dist-upgrade; nice fink index; nice fink selfupdate; nice fink update-all; nice fink scanpackages; nice fink list -i; date I cut and paste this as one line into my command prompt. Now, this is after issuing the su command so that I don't have to be present when apt-get asks for a password (in other words, I'm logged in as root). To break down what this does, let me first say that I know that some of these command are superfluous, but I don't believe they should ever create problems. Also, the 'nice' sets those commands to run in the background in case you need to be doing something else while fink is crunching away. So, by the numbers, my meager understanding is this: date: tells me when the processes began fink scanpackages: checks for binaries available locally fink index: a safety check apt-get update: tells apt what binaries are available on the remote machine apt-get dist-upgrade: installs updated binaries and their dependencies (apt-get upgrade will not install updated binaries if they require new files, so I wouldn't use that) fink index: tells fink what apt got fink selfupdate: installs a new package manager if available fink update-all: installs updated files that must be built from source fink scanpackages: tells fink what dpkg did fink list -i: tells me what I have installed date: tells me when the processes ended One thing you might do would be to add a 'fink --version' command before and after to see if there were changes made to the package manager, or you might add a 'printenv' command for debugging purposes later. At any rate, I pretty much use that command string whenever I update and it never causes problems. I have two machines, one with unstable activated and the other without. The command string works fine on both machines. Good luck, Robert --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php ___ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
[Fink-beginners] Upgraded Powerbook - need to rebuild?
Greetings, Recently, I upgraded my Powerbook from a Pismo (G3) to a 17 (G4). The system nicely copied everything over, including my /sw directory. Everything's working fine, but ... Should I attempt to rebuild all my packages under fink? Do open source packages do anything different when compiling on a G4 vs a G3? Is there something I need to do to change my hardware configuration? Does fink sense and do anything special if an Altivec processor is present? If so, is there an easy way to do it? Ideally, mass build everything if it would yield any advantages Thanks in advance. -- Verne -- It's not what you don't know that'll hurt you - it's what you _do_ know that isn't so.
[Fink-beginners] Any help? installing imagemagick-6.0.7-4 failed
/usr/bin/install -d -m 755 /sw/src/root-imagemagick-6.0.7-4/sw/share/doc/imagemagick /usr/bin/install -c -p -m 644 www/Copyright.html README.txt QuickStart.txt ChangeLog NEWS /sw/src/root-imagemagick-6.0.7-4/sw/share/doc/imagemagick/ install: QuickStart.txt: No such file or directory ### execution of /usr/bin/install failed, exit code 71 Failed: installing imagemagick-6.0.7-4 failed Any help here? Heinz --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php ___ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
Re: [Fink-beginners] Any help? installing imagemagick-6.0.7-4 failed
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004, Heinz Nabielek wrote: /usr/bin/install -d -m 755 /sw/src/root-imagemagick-6.0.7-4/sw/share/doc/imagemagick /usr/bin/install -c -p -m 644 www/Copyright.html README.txt QuickStart.txt ChangeLog NEWS /sw/src/root-imagemagick-6.0.7-4/sw/share/doc/imagemagick/ install: QuickStart.txt: No such file or directory ### execution of /usr/bin/install failed, exit code 71 Failed: installing imagemagick-6.0.7-4 failed I think the info file, committed this morning, does not match the new tarball. I also think the maintainer has a job and can't fix it right away. Try again tomorrow. -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - [EMAIL PROTECTED] BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php ___ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
Re: [Fink-beginners] Reinstall on remote disk, no new packages listed
On Sep 13, 2004, at 2:59 PM, Brian Burnham wrote: I hope I have done my homework here. I am using the most recent releases of Fink for 10.2 and Fink Commander. I deleted a previous (working) install to reinstall a clean version on a firewire disk. The disk where I installed Fink also has 10.2.0 while my booted drive is running 10.2.8 The installer created the symlink sw, which links to sw on the root of the Firewire drive. When I load a package list (either in Fink Commander or Fink's command line) I get 49 packages, which include the Fink components and virtual packages - but no installable packages listed. My thoughts are that I might need to update the OS on the Firewire disk to 10.2.8. I have reinstalled Fink and Fink Commander and even booted to the Firewire disk and tried running Fink, still the same 49 packages. Appreciate the help Did you try updating your package descriptions? -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documentarian Day Job: Levitated Dipole Experiment http://www.psfc.mit.edu/LDX --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php ___ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
[Fink-beginners] G77
I get this error when i try to install g77. gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -I. -I../../gcc-3.4-20031015/libiberty/../include -W -Wall -Wtraditional -pedantic ../../gcc-3.4-20031015/libiberty/getruntime.c -o getruntime.o gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/cpp-precomp) Please submit a full bug report. See URL:http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter for instructions. make[1]: *** [getruntime.o] Error 1 make: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.zVjkFd failed, exit code 2 Failed: compiling g77-3.4-20031015-2 failed What can I do? --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php ___ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
[Fink-beginners] Re: G77
Artour Kitbalian [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I get this error when i try to install g77. gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -I. -I../../gcc-3.4-20031015/libiberty/../include -W -Wall -Wtraditional -pedantic ../../gcc-3.4-20031015/libiberty/getruntime.c -o getruntime.o gcc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/cpp-precomp) Please submit a full bug report. See URL:http://developer.apple.com/bugreporter for instructions. make[1]: *** [getruntime.o] Error 1 make: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.2.zVjkFd failed, exit code 2 Failed: compiling g77-3.4-20031015-2 failed What can I do? Update your package descriptions. For 10.3, g77 is now at 3.4.1-1 in the stable dist and 3.4.2-1 in unstable. dan -- Daniel Macks [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php ___ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
Re: [Fink-beginners] Any help? installing imagemagick-6.0.7-4 failed
At 11:20 PM +0200 9/13/04, Heinz Nabielek wrote: /usr/bin/install -d -m 755 /sw/src/root-imagemagick-6.0.7-4/sw/share/doc/imagemagick /usr/bin/install -c -p -m 644 www/Copyright.html README.txt QuickStart.txt ChangeLog NEWS /sw/src/root-imagemagick-6.0.7-4/sw/share/doc/imagemagick/ install: QuickStart.txt: No such file or directory ### execution of /usr/bin/install failed, exit code 71 Failed: installing imagemagick-6.0.7-4 failed Any help here? Hisashi is probably right when he writes: I think the info file, committed this morning, does not match the new tarball. I also think the maintainer has a job and can't fix it right away. Try again tomorrow. Certainly the maintainer has been busy: in the last few days, he's updated the imagemagick.info file to go fro 5.5-something to 6.0.7, -.7-1, -.7-3, and now -7.4. Nevertheless, I'm currently in the process of building the package, but I've had to go through some contortions. There do appear to be mistakes in the .info file. Your problem with Quickstart.txt was because this file apparently no longer exists in the current tarball (it did in earlier versions) so in at least one of the lines reading DocFiles: www/Copyright.html README.txt QuickStart.txt ChangeLog NEWS the QuickStart.txt should be removed. I assume that would be all of the lines, namely 60, 70, and 72. Also, it appears to me that his line 7, Source: mirror:sourceforge:imagemagick/ImageMagick-%v-3.tar.gz needs to be amended to cite the current version 4, not 3: it seems to me that the way to do this would be not to replace the 3 by a 4, but by the symbol %r for the revision number in general, i.e. Source: mirror:sourceforge:imagemagick/ImageMagick-%v-%r.tar.gz Similarly, it seems to me that his line 10, SourceRename: ImageMagick-%v.tar.gz should actually read SourceRename: ImageMagick-%v-%r.tar.gz since this is the format of the actual tarball's name. I also had a problem with mismatching checksums, which doesn't really surprise me; if you do too, you might just tell fink to proceed anyway, for now. Or, as Hisashi said, you might wait (and I might have waited) until tomorrow. Best wishes, Jonathan --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php ___ Fink-beginners mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-beginners
