[Fink-users] qtlib
Howdie- I've got a little problem. I'm trying to build a static version of Bibletime so that I can bundle it into an OS X application, but ran across a little problem. I need the library libqt-mt.a. Apparently, it's essential to building static versions of apps. is there a Fink package I can download to get it (without overloading with tons of other things I don't need), or should I simply find the older QT source on trolltech and make that? At the moment, I'm downloading that, and will see if a simple make will create my file for me, that I can drop into the proper /sw/ folder, but I am hoping someone here can help me with a better solution. :-) TIA -- -Jon Glass Krakow, Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no such thing as public opinion. There is only published opinion. --Winston Churchill - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] trouble with Octave
I have both PPC and Intel installations of Octave. They both give the wrong answer to this short script. num = [1 0 1]; den = [1 0 18 0 81]; [a,p,k,e] = residue(num,den) I did the math ... (x^2+1)/(x^4+18*x^2+81) = (2/9)/(x-3i) + (2/9)/(x+3i) + (1/54i)/(x-3i)^2 - (1/54i)/(x+3i)^2 Thus, a = [1/54i 2/9 -1/54i 2/9] p = [3i 3i -3i -3i] k = [] e = [2 1 2 1] However, my Intel version gives a = -3.0108e+06 - 1.9734e+06i -3.0108e+06 + 1.9734e+06i 3.0108e+06 + 1.9734e+06i 3.0108e+06 - 1.9734e+06i p = -0. + 3.i -0. - 3.i 0. + 3.i 0. - 3.i k = [](0x0) e = 1 1 1 1 and my PPC version gives a = 8.4492e+06 - 3.9658e+06i 8.4492e+06 + 3.9658e+06i -8.4492e+06 + 3.9658e+06i -8.4492e+06 - 3.9658e+06i p = 0. + 3.i 0. - 3.i -0. + 3.i -0. - 3.i k = [](0x0) e = 1 1 1 1 For reference, Matlab gives a = 0 - 0.0926i 0. - 0.i 0 + 0.0926i 0. + 0.i p = 0. + 3.i 0. + 3.i 0. - 3.i 0. - 3.i k = [] A non-Fink installation for 2.9.14 produces the correct answer as well, see the link below. http://www.nabble.com/bug-in-residue.m-tf4475396.html Can any confirm they get the same result? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/trouble-with-Octave-tf4502540.html#a12841144 Sent from the fink-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] trouble with Octave
On 23 Sep 2007, at 00:54, Ben Abbott wrote: I have both PPC and Intel installations of Octave. They both give the wrong answer to this short script. num = [1 0 1]; den = [1 0 18 0 81]; [a,p,k,e] = residue(num,den) I did the math ... (x^2+1)/(x^4+18*x^2+81) = (2/9)/(x-3i) + (2/9)/(x+3i) + (1/54i)/ (x-3i)^2 - (1/54i)/(x+3i)^2 Please redo ! Once is apparently not sufficient .. Or at least check that your equality above is not right! Correct coefficients with you sequence of denominators are -5i/54 , 5i/54 , 2/9 , 2/9 ... if I'm not mistaken. But this has no importance : A non-Fink installation for 2.9.14 produces the correct answer as well, see the link below. http://www.nabble.com/bug-in-residue.m-tf4475396.html The link documents quite well that it is an upstream problem, and the guy who claims he had no problems doesn't know what he is talking about: he also gets 6 digit coefficients, and no pole multiplicity. (and by the way, he is also using Octave 2.9.13 on Mac OS X) Can any confirm they get the same result? Sure I But as said, this is an upstream problem, not fink's ! JF Mertens - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] trouble with Octave
Jean-François Mertens-3 wrote: Please redo ! Once is apparently not sufficient .. Or at least check that your equality above is not right! Correct coefficients with you sequence of denominators are -5i/54 , 5i/54 , 2/9 , 2/9 ... if I'm not mistaken. Thanks for the correction. Jean-François Mertens-3 wrote: But this has no importance : The link documents quite well that it is an upstream problem, [...] Agreed. Just making sure its not just me. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/trouble-with-Octave-tf4511817.html#a12870464 Sent from the fink-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] XChat fink update-all fails
Hello all: I got this error when running fink update-all : Can't resolve dependency gtk+2-shlibs (= 2.10.0-1) for package xchat-2.8.2-1021 (no matching packages/versions found) Exiting with failure. Here's the result of fink --version : Package manager version: 0.27.6 Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync i386 and I'm using Mac OSX 10.4.10 on an iMac Core 2 Duo 2GHz. Thanks for any help. :) Sean - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
