[Fink-users] Preventing the update of a specific package

2009-01-02 Thread M. Singh
Hello

I just installed a package from unstable that necessitated the 
compilation of gcc43. On this slow machine, this process tool half a day.

Is there a way I can prevent this from occurring again when I issue fink 
update-all or anything like that ?

Thanks.


--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] Preventing the update of a specific package

2009-01-02 Thread Alexander Hansen
M. Singh wrote:
 Hello

 I just installed a package from unstable that necessitated the 
 compilation of gcc43. On this slow machine, this process tool half a day.

 Is there a way I can prevent this from occurring again when I issue fink 
 update-all or anything like that ?

 Thanks.


   
(I have to chuckle at half a day--on 10.4 on my G4 it takes 3 days to
build gcc43; on 10.5 it's more like a day and a half on the same
machine, if I recall correctly)

If you want to keep a specific package out of the upgrade list, you'll
just have to avoid using update-all.  We don't have
update-all-except; though a little shell script could do that.

Or, there are unofficial binary distributions; where unofficial means
that the project doesn't control them, and therefore if there's a bad
binary all we can do is try to fix whatever is causing the misbuild and
tell you to rebuild whatever package is problematic.

--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] Cairo pixman depend on each other?

2009-01-02 Thread Neil Tiffin

On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:

 Neil Tiffin wrote:
 Package manager version: 0.28.6
 Distribution version: selfupdate-rsync Thu Jan  1 14:15:01 2009,  
 10.5,  i386
 try to install pixman, but get error about cairo
 ===
 clip-test.c:97: warning: unused variable 'p1'
 /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc  -g -O2 -Wall -  
 fvisibility=hidden   -o clip-test clip-test.o ../pixman/ 
 libpixman-1.la  -L/sw/lib -L/sw/lib/freetype219/lib -L/sw/lib/pango- 
 ft219/lib -L/usr/ X11/lib -Wl,-framework,CoreServices -Wl,- 
 framework,ApplicationServices  -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 - 
 latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 - lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 - 
 lpangocairo-1.0 -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lz - lfontconfig - 
 lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl
 mkdir .libs
 libtool: link: cannot find the library `/sw/lib/libcairo.la' or   
 unhandled argument `/sw/lib/libcairo.la'
 make[2]: *** [clip-test] Error 1

 Obviously, pixman needs a configure parameter --disable-gtk

Did that and it all compiled, not sure if I broke anything else.

thanks,

Neil


--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] Cairo pixman depend on each other?

2009-01-02 Thread Martin Costabel
Neil Tiffin wrote:
[]
 Obviously, pixman needs a configure parameter --disable-gtk
 
 Did that and it all compiled, not sure if I broke anything else.

I don't think so. The only influence of that flag is that some tests are 
not compiled and executed. But this has no effect on the installed files.

-- 
Martin


--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] Preventing the update of a specific package

2009-01-02 Thread M. Singh
Alexander Hansen wrote:
 M. Singh wrote:
 Hello

 I just installed a package from unstable that necessitated the 
 compilation of gcc43. On this slow machine, this process tool half a day.

 Is there a way I can prevent this from occurring again when I issue fink 
 update-all or anything like that ?

 Thanks.


   
 (I have to chuckle at half a day--on 10.4 on my G4 it takes 3 days to
 build gcc43; on 10.5 it's more like a day and a half on the same
 machine, if I recall correctly)
 
 If you want to keep a specific package out of the upgrade list, you'll
 just have to avoid using update-all.  We don't have
 update-all-except; though a little shell script could do that.
 
 Or, there are unofficial binary distributions; where unofficial means
 that the project doesn't control them, and therefore if there's a bad
 binary all we can do is try to fix whatever is causing the misbuild and
 tell you to rebuild whatever package is problematic.
 
 --

Thanks for the response.

Since fink is so similar in certain ways to apt-get (even has some of 
those commands), I was wondering if there was something like a hold on a 
package.

I guess not.


--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


[Fink-users] Questions about package database on http://www.finkproject.org/

2009-01-02 Thread Richard Cobbe
I'm getting some really weird results from the package search function on
http://www.finkproject.org/.

I'm trying to see if there are any available updates to svn-client.  (I'm
running fink 0.28.6 and tracking unstable source on MacOS 10.5, intel.)  So
I went to http://www.finkproject.org/, clicked on the packages link in
the left sidebar, entered svn-client in the box, hit Submit.

The immediate result makes sense; it lists a bunch of packages, including
svn-client, whose latest version is 1.5.4-2 (which is what I'm currently
running).

However, when I click on the package name to bring up the page with details
about that specific package, I get very strange results; screenshot
attached.  I'm deeply suspicious about two things: first, why does the
title of the page say svn-client-0.33.1-1 and not svn-client or
svn-client-1.5.4-2?  And second, why doesn't the chart list 1.5.4-2 as
being available in unstable?

Am I misinterpreting these results?  Or is there something strange with the
program that produces them?  Or is it really the case that the version of
svn-client available for 10.4 is more recent than that for 10.5?

Deeply confused,

Richard

--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] build issue with glitz-0.5.6-3 was Re: Compiling gnuplot

2009-01-02 Thread Benjamin Reed
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 1:37 PM,  gjm...@gmail.com wrote:
 In file included from glitz_agl_drawable.c:30:
 glitz_aglint.h:34:23: error: OpenGL/gl.h: No such file or directory
 In file included from glitz_aglint.h:36,
 from glitz_agl_drawable.c:30:
 /System/Library/Frameworks/AGL.framework/Headers/agl.h:264: error: parse
 error before 'GLint'

Looks like you're missing some important frameworks in your
installation.  Try re-installing Xcode and make sure all the
development frameworks are checked.


-- 
Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick
Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development

Blog: http://www.raccoonfink.com/
Music: http://music.raccoonfink.com/

--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] Questions about package database on http://www.finkproject.org/

2009-01-02 Thread Alexander Hansen

On Jan 2, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Richard Cobbe wrote:

 I'm getting some really weird results from the package search  
 function on
 http://www.finkproject.org/.

 I'm trying to see if there are any available updates to svn-client.   
 (I'm
 running fink 0.28.6 and tracking unstable source on MacOS 10.5,  
 intel.)  So
 I went to http://www.finkproject.org/, clicked on the packages  
 link in
 the left sidebar, entered svn-client in the box, hit Submit.

 The immediate result makes sense; it lists a bunch of packages,  
 including
 svn-client, whose latest version is 1.5.4-2 (which is what I'm  
 currently
 running).

 However, when I click on the package name to bring up the page with  
 details
 about that specific package, I get very strange results; screenshot
 attached.  I'm deeply suspicious about two things: first, why does the
 title of the page say svn-client-0.33.1-1 and not svn-client or
 svn-client-1.5.4-2?  And second, why doesn't the chart list  
 1.5.4-2 as
 being available in unstable?

 Am I misinterpreting these results?  Or is there something strange  
 with the
 program that produces them?  Or is it really the case that the  
 version of
 svn-client available for 10.4 is more recent than that for 10.5?

 Deeply confused,

 Richard


The package database isn't working properly right now.   If you'll  
look at the bottom, you'll see that the 0.33.1-1 is coming from the  
10.2-gcc3.3 distribution (there are several versions for that  
distribution, and why it defaults to that one is a mystery to me).

--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] Questions about package database on http://www.finkproject.org/

2009-01-02 Thread Richard Cobbe
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 03:07:10PM -0500, Richard Cobbe wrote:
 I'm getting some really weird results from the package search function on
 http://www.finkproject.org/.

SNIP

 However, when I click on the package name to bring up the page with details
 about that specific package, I get very strange results; screenshot
 attached.  I'm deeply suspicious about two things: first, why does the
 title of the page say svn-client-0.33.1-1 and not svn-client or
 svn-client-1.5.4-2?  And second, why doesn't the chart list 1.5.4-2 as
 being available in unstable?

Sorry -- now attached.

Richard
attachment: packages-screenshot.png--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] Preventing the update of a specific package

2009-01-02 Thread Kevin Horton
On 2-Jan-09, at 03:47 , M. Singh wrote:

 I just installed a package from unstable that necessitated the
 compilation of gcc43. On this slow machine, this process tool half a  
 day.

 Is there a way I can prevent this from occurring again when I issue  
 fink
 update-all or anything like that ?

M. Singh,

I had a similar need, so I hacked together a python script:

http://www.kilohotel.com/fink/fink_update_most.py

You would need to make it executable (chmod +x fink_update_most.py)  
save it somewhere that is in your machine's PATH.  Edit line 28 to  
point to a text file that lists all packages that should not be  
updated, one package per line.  Then, instead of doing fink update- 
all, do fink_update_most.py.  The script identifies all out of date  
packages, removes the ones you don't want to update, then it creates a  
fink command line, and asks you to confirm before it runs it.

I am a very amateur programmer, so this comes with no warrantees, and  
I am sure there are 100 better ways to do the job.  But it works for me.

Good luck,
--
Kevin Horton
Ottawa, Canada




--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


Re: [Fink-users] Questions about package database on http://www.finkproject.org/

2009-01-02 Thread David R. Morrison
Richard,

Sad to say, the automated package database is somewhat broken, and has  
been for quite a while.  The one person on the fink core team who is  
an expert at this has had very limited time for fink, so this hasn't  
been fixed.  It would be great if somebody got interested in this  
problem, and stepped forward as a volunteer to figure out what's going  
on and how to fix it.  The skills required would include mysql, perl,  
and php.

   -- Dave


On Jan 2, 2009, at 1:24 PM, Richard Cobbe wrote:

 On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 03:07:10PM -0500, Richard Cobbe wrote:
 I'm getting some really weird results from the package search  
 function on
 http://www.finkproject.org/.

 SNIP

 However, when I click on the package name to bring up the page with  
 details
 about that specific package, I get very strange results; screenshot
 attached.  I'm deeply suspicious about two things: first, why does  
 the
 title of the page say svn-client-0.33.1-1 and not svn-client or
 svn-client-1.5.4-2?  And second, why doesn't the chart list  
 1.5.4-2 as
 being available in unstable?

 Sorry -- now attached.

 Richard
 packages- 
 screenshot 
 .png 
  
 --
 ___
 Fink-users mailing list
 Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users


[Fink-users] Phynchronicity 2.3 released

2009-01-02 Thread Kevin Walzer
I have released  Phynchronicity 2.3, my GUI for the Fink Unix-software 
package management system on Mac OS X.

Phynchronicity provides a graphical user interface for Fink, a powerful 
command-line tool for installing and updating thousands of Unix-based 
applications for the Mac. But Fink's sheer power and scale make it hard 
to use, even with a GUI.

Phynchronicity aims to make Fink easy to use. Unlike other GUI tools for
Fink, it does not overwhelm the user with options. Instead, with a 
simple three-pane interface, it lets users get started doing what they
want to do--finding, installing, and removing packages.

Phynchronicity 2.3 adds the following improvements and features:

* Significantly faster application startup: now reads from cached list 
of Fink packages. Only queries Fink database after installing, removing, 
or updating a Fink package or Fink itself.

* Configure Fink in Terminal using a menu command.

* Can now print log output to default printer.

* Now uses integrated help viewer.

* Saves window position on application close.

Phynchronicity is shareware; a license costs $24.95 and a 30-day demo is 
available. Mac OS X 10.4 is the minimum supported OS. Phynchronicity is 
a universal binary.

For more information about Phynchronicity, including download links, see 
http://www.codebykevin.com/phynchronicity.html.
-- 
Kevin Walzer
Code by Kevin
http://www.codebykevin.com

--
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users