[Fink-users] gstreamer-dev-0.8.12 build failure
During an update-all i see this: /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. - I. -I.. -fno-common -I/sw/lib/freetype219/include/freetype2 -I/sw/ lib/freetype219/include -I/sw/lib/pango-ft219/include -I/sw/include -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -I/sw/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE - D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/ include -I/sw/include/libxml2 -I/sw/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE - D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fno-common -g -Wall - DGST_DISABLE_DEPRECATED-I.. -DGST_MAJORMINOR=\0.8\ -Os - funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -fno-common -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -c -o libcothreads_la-cothreads.lo `test -f 'cothreads.c' || echo './'`cothreads.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -fno-common -I/sw/lib/freetype219/ include/freetype2 -I/sw/lib/freetype219/include -I/sw/lib/pango- ft219/include -I/sw/include -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -I/sw/include - D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/sw/ include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/libxml2 - I/sw/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fno-common -g -Wall -DGST_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -I.. -DGST_MAJORMINOR=\0.8\ -Os -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -fno-common -D_XOPEN_SOURCE -c cothreads.c -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/libcothreads_la-cothreads.o cothreads.c: In function 'cothread_switch': cothreads.c:654: error: nested functions are disabled, use -fnested- functions to re-enable cothreads.c:654: error: syntax error before '-' token cothreads.c:654: error: parse error before 'char' cothreads.c:654: error: parse error before ';' token make[4]: *** [libcothreads_la-cothreads.lo] Error 1 make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.1.wDc4Yf failed, exit code 2 Removing runtime build-lock... PowerMac G5 1.6 GHz [2 GB mem] Os X.4.11, Apple X11, XCode 2.5, Fink 0.29.9 -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] pangomm1.4.1-2.24.0-2 fails to build.
Alexander Hansen schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moritz Kaiser wrote: On my Intelmac (10.4.11) pangomm fails to build and rants about a missing library: ---8-*snip* Making all in extra_defs_gen g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../pango -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include -I/sw/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/sw/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -I/sw/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/sw/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/sw/include/cairo -I/sw/include/pixman-1 -I/sw/include/freetype2 -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/libpng12 -I/sw/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11/include -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include -DX_LOCALE -I/sw/include -Os -pipe -c -o generate_defs_pango.o generate_defs_pango.cc/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -Os -pipe -L/sw/lib/fontconfig2/lib -L/sw/lib -o generate_extra_defs generate_defs_pango.o -L/sw/lib -lglibmm-2.4 -lcairomm-1.0 -lsigc-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl -lglibmm_generate_extra_defs-2.4 mkdir .libs libtool: link: warning: library `/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' was moved. libtool: link: warning: library `/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' was moved. libtool: link: cannot find the library `/sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' or unhandled argument `/sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' make[3]: *** [generate_extra_defs] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2### execution of make failed, exit code 2 ---8*snip* I reinstalled libsigc++, I checked if the /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la was in place, it still is. Does anyone have a clue? Regards, Moritz The issue is the reference to /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la That file doesn't exist any more because it's in a directory which was temporarily created. Try the following: find /sw/lib -name *.la | xargs grep -l root-libsigc | xargs dpkg -S | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq` That will rebuild any packages that contain a reference to that nonexistent file. After that run find /sw/lib -name *.la | xargs grep -l root-libsigc and see if anything still shows up. - -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqyrfcACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ+1BQCfSoqee2o4ytB9peghppxAPZUl wZUAn0ezucFXkOSilUMZydhRpUhsUyi4 =yQ5C -END PGP SIGNATURE- Hi, I did the rebuild over the packagenames that came out of the first search-expression. There were only three. But the second expression revealed: hinz-kunzs-computer:~ takezo$ find /sw/lib -name *.la | xargs grep -l root-libsigc /sw/lib/libcairomm-1.0.la /sw/lib/libgiomm-2.4.la /sw/lib/libglibmm-2.4.la /sw/lib/libglibmm_generate_extra_defs-2.4.la /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la hinz-kunzs-computer:~ takezo$ And the libpangomm didn't build either. Regards and thanks in advance, Moritz -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] fink on 10.6: 32/64-bit
Hello: I installed Mac OS 10.6 and think about migrating Fink to 64-bit. However, I'd like to see which packages of those which I've installed would not be available. Is there an easy way to have Fink comparing which ones (of the installed packages) are currently not available for 64-bit? Thanks for your input. Claus -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] X11 or emacs problem on fresh install of Snow Leopard
Le 18 sept. 09 à 01:24, Martin Costabel a écrit : It turns out that both emacs22 and emacs23 have not yet been adapted to systems that lack xmkmf. They need to use the configure flags --x-includes=/usr/X11R6/include --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib (Maintainer CCed, so this should be fixed very soon) It should be fixed now. Sébastien -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] openmotif4 to replace openmotif3
Hi there, I have SN 10.6.1 with kernel and Fink set to 64 bits. All has been installing beautifully so far and I am even taking further. For example, for packages that asked for dependencies on openmotif3, I simply changed that for openmotif4 in their respective *.info files. For example, I did it for tetex.info and it installed and worked nicely. So I am recommending to the maintainer of tetex packages, in particular, and to others maintainers that have references to openmotif3, to review their *.info files and test it obviously. I suggested that for molmol.info and I saw today that the maintainer updated it for unstable. Molmol is working fine for me. Cheers, Alan -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] fink on 10.6: 32/64-bit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Claus Atzenbeck wrote: Hello: I installed Mac OS 10.6 and think about migrating Fink to 64-bit. However, I'd like to see which packages of those which I've installed would not be available. Is there an easy way to have Fink comparing which ones (of the installed packages) are currently not available for 64-bit? Thanks for your input. Claus Not as of yet. The advanced search item from http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/browse.php hasn't been modified to select for x86_64. The best thing to do for now is the more laborious option of looking for the packages you need on the PDB and to check whether they're available or not. - -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqzb1gACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ8TSQCdHiG75gWRq7u49NoLyMLALHp3 XlMAoIXsxHOMCVimmiXPBYtUCwagcddw =k+p9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] pangomm1.4.1-2.24.0-2 fails to build.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moritz Kaiser wrote: Alexander Hansen schrieb: Moritz Kaiser wrote: On my Intelmac (10.4.11) pangomm fails to build and rants about a missing library: ---8-*snip* Making all in extra_defs_gen g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../pango -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include -I/sw/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/sw/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -I/sw/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/sw/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/sw/include/cairo -I/sw/include/pixman-1 -I/sw/include/freetype2 -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/libpng12 -I/sw/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11/include -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include -DX_LOCALE -I/sw/include -Os -pipe -c -o generate_defs_pango.o generate_defs_pango.cc/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -Os -pipe -L/sw/lib/fontconfig2/lib -L/sw/lib -o generate_extra_defs generate_defs_pango.o -L/sw/lib -lglibmm-2.4 -lcairomm-1.0 -lsigc-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl -lglibmm_generate_extra_defs-2.4 mkdir .libs libtool: link: warning: library `/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' was moved. libtool: link: warning: library `/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' was moved. libtool: link: cannot find the library `/sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' or unhandled argument `/sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' make[3]: *** [generate_extra_defs] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2### execution of make failed, exit code 2 ---8*snip* I reinstalled libsigc++, I checked if the /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la was in place, it still is. Does anyone have a clue? Regards, Moritz The issue is the reference to /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la That file doesn't exist any more because it's in a directory which was temporarily created. Try the following: find /sw/lib -name *.la | xargs grep -l root-libsigc | xargs dpkg -S | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq` That will rebuild any packages that contain a reference to that nonexistent file. After that run find /sw/lib -name *.la | xargs grep -l root-libsigc and see if anything still shows up. Hi, I did the rebuild over the packagenames that came out of the first search-expression. There were only three. But the second expression revealed: hinz-kunzs-computer:~ takezo$ find /sw/lib -name *.la | xargs grep -l root-libsigc /sw/lib/libcairomm-1.0.la /sw/lib/libgiomm-2.4.la /sw/lib/libglibmm-2.4.la /sw/lib/libglibmm_generate_extra_defs-2.4.la /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la hinz-kunzs-computer:~ takezo$ And the libpangomm didn't build either. Regards and thanks in advance, Moritz Hmm...I just realized that the method I suggested might not work quite properly since the referencing in .la files would depend on the order. Try the following sequence: fink remove libsigc++2 fink rebuild libsigc++2 fink reinstall libsigc++2 to make sure that the version you just built got installed, and look at /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la to see if /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la is still mentioned. If that isn't there anymore, using fink rebuild glibmm2.4-dev cairomm1 should clean up the remaining references. On the other hand, if /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la still mentions /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la , then you'll want to edit that file as a super-user and change /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la to /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la wherever it occurs, and then use fink rebuild glibmm2.4-dev cairomm1 However, I hope rebuilding libsigc++2 in the manner that I've mentioned will do the job, because the bad path is encoded in the .deb archive for libsigc++2 on your system right now. - -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqzcu0ACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ/icQCcD0vsZm5/N2mbeIi2ayTJwZWX L7IAoKClhwbGYovL6XDYMOWwquQ64N7Z =WHax -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] fink on 10.6: 32/64-bit
One crude measure is the raw number of package available. If I recall correctly, the 32-bit version on Leopard used to report about 9500 packages. I now run the 64-bit fink on Snow Leopard and fink reports 8125 packages as available. So, More than 85% of the packages seem to be available. Those are your odds. :) Payam -- Thanks to TV and for the convenience of TV, you can only be one of two kinds of human beings, either a liberal or a conservative. --Kurt Vonnegut On Sep 18, 2009, at 4:46 AM, fink-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: Hello: I installed Mac OS 10.6 and think about migrating Fink to 64-bit. However, I'd like to see which packages of those which I've installed would not be available. Is there an easy way to have Fink comparing which ones (of the installed packages) are currently not available for 64-bit? Thanks for your input. Claus -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] fink on 10.6: 32/64-bit
One warning about this analysis: in the stable tree, we've tested everything on 10.6 (both 32-bit and 64-bit), and excluded the things which didn't build. But in the unstable tree (which you are using), we haven't done that yet, so just because the package seems to be available in unstable, there is not a guarantee that it will build. -- Dave On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:35 AM, PNM wrote: One crude measure is the raw number of package available. If I recall correctly, the 32-bit version on Leopard used to report about 9500 packages. I now run the 64-bit fink on Snow Leopard and fink reports 8125 packages as available. So, More than 85% of the packages seem to be available. Those are your odds. :) Payam -- Thanks to TV and for the convenience of TV, you can only be one of two kinds of human beings, either a liberal or a conservative. --Kurt Vonnegut On Sep 18, 2009, at 4:46 AM, fink-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: Hello: I installed Mac OS 10.6 and think about migrating Fink to 64-bit. However, I'd like to see which packages of those which I've installed would not be available. Is there an easy way to have Fink comparing which ones (of the installed packages) are currently not available for 64-bit? Thanks for your input. Claus -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] fink on 10.6: 32/64-bit
Yes, thank you for that clarification! I am using the unstable tree. So far so good. :) See my glowing compliments of yesterday. Payam --- ...my son's experience proves that faith is actually quite a simple matter. He was down and out, the Catholics took him in, and before he knew it, he had faith. So it was gratitude that decided the issue, most likely. Human decisions are terribly simple. Milan Kundera The Unbearable Lightness of Being On Sep 18, 2009, at 8:29 AM, David R. Morrison wrote: One warning about this analysis: in the stable tree, we've tested everything on 10.6 (both 32-bit and 64-bit), and excluded the things which didn't build. But in the unstable tree (which you are using), we haven't done that yet, so just because the package seems to be available in unstable, there is not a guarantee that it will build. -- Dave On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:35 AM, PNM wrote: One crude measure is the raw number of package available. If I recall correctly, the 32-bit version on Leopard used to report about 9500 packages. I now run the 64-bit fink on Snow Leopard and fink reports 8125 packages as available. So, More than 85% of the packages seem to be available. Those are your odds. :) Payam -- Thanks to TV and for the convenience of TV, you can only be one of two kinds of human beings, either a liberal or a conservative. --Kurt Vonnegut On Sep 18, 2009, at 4:46 AM, fink-users-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote: Hello: I installed Mac OS 10.6 and think about migrating Fink to 64-bit. However, I'd like to see which packages of those which I've installed would not be available. Is there an easy way to have Fink comparing which ones (of the installed packages) are currently not available for 64-bit? Thanks for your input. Claus -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] gstreamer-dev-0.8.12 build failure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/18/09 4:47 AM, David Lowe wrote: cothreads.c -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/libcothreads_la-cothreads.o cothreads.c: In function 'cothread_switch': cothreads.c:654: error: nested functions are disabled, use -fnested- functions to re-enable cothreads.c:654: error: syntax error before '-' token cothreads.c:654: error: parse error before 'char' cothreads.c:654: error: parse error before ';' token make[4]: *** [libcothreads_la-cothreads.lo] Error 1 make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 ### execution of /var/tmp/tmp.1.wDc4Yf failed, exit code 2 Removing runtime build-lock... PowerMac G5 1.6 GHz [2 GB mem] Os X.4.11, Apple X11, XCode 2.5, Fink 0.29.9 I should be getting my PPC machine back tomorrow, so I can figure out a fix that retains 10.5/10.6 compatibility. - -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development Blog: http://www.raccoonfink.com/ Music: http://music.raccoonfink.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.12 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFKs6jnUu+jZtP2Zf4RAqdZAJ47NuMK74TEkAXiNptRnvUQh7+e2wCeJFDK 4qN3oY1InE75pujN8/HA3D0= =40VD -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] fink on 10.6: 32/64-bit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/18/09 7:30 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Not as of yet. The advanced search item from http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/browse.php hasn't been modified to select for x86_64. fixed: http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/browse.php?architecture=x86_64 - -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development Blog: http://www.raccoonfink.com/ Music: http://music.raccoonfink.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.12 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFKs6pVUu+jZtP2Zf4RAowaAJ9ZZVVVsMA8yTAey3ugIMhtXM1AWACgnAXw vkcPZVXYgWmpXjnecBew2xs= =jQF0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] pangomm1.4.1-2.24.0-2 fails to build.
Alexander Hansen schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moritz Kaiser wrote: Alexander Hansen schrieb: Moritz Kaiser wrote: On my Intelmac (10.4.11) pangomm fails to build and rants about a missing library: ---8-*snip* Making all in extra_defs_gen g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../pango -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include -I/sw/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/sw/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -I/sw/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/sw/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/sw/include/cairo -I/sw/include/pixman-1 -I/sw/include/freetype2 -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/libpng12 -I/sw/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11/include -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include -DX_LOCALE -I/sw/include -Os -pipe -c -o generate_defs_pango.o generate_defs_pango.cc/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -Os -pipe -L/sw/lib/fontconfig2/lib -L/sw/lib -o generate_extra_defs generate_defs_pango.o -L/sw/lib -lglibmm-2.4 -lcairomm-1.0 -lsigc-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl -lglibmm_generate_extra_defs-2.4 mkdir .libs libtool: link: warning: library `/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' was moved. libtool: link: warning: library `/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' was moved. libtool: link: cannot find the library `/sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' or unhandled argument `/sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' make[3]: *** [generate_extra_defs] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2### execution of make failed, exit code 2 ---8*snip* I reinstalled libsigc++, I checked if the /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la was in place, it still is. Does anyone have a clue? Regards, Moritz The issue is the reference to /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la That file doesn't exist any more because it's in a directory which was temporarily created. Try the following: find /sw/lib -name *.la | xargs grep -l root-libsigc | xargs dpkg -S | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq` That will rebuild any packages that contain a reference to that nonexistent file. After that run find /sw/lib -name *.la | xargs grep -l root-libsigc and see if anything still shows up. Hi, I did the rebuild over the packagenames that came out of the first search-expression. There were only three. But the second expression revealed: hinz-kunzs-computer:~ takezo$ find /sw/lib -name *.la | xargs grep -l root-libsigc /sw/lib/libcairomm-1.0.la /sw/lib/libgiomm-2.4.la /sw/lib/libglibmm-2.4.la /sw/lib/libglibmm_generate_extra_defs-2.4.la /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la hinz-kunzs-computer:~ takezo$ And the libpangomm didn't build either. Regards and thanks in advance, Moritz Hmm...I just realized that the method I suggested might not work quite properly since the referencing in .la files would depend on the order. Try the following sequence: fink remove libsigc++2 fink rebuild libsigc++2 fink reinstall libsigc++2 to make sure that the version you just built got installed, and look at /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la to see if /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la is still mentioned. If that isn't there anymore, using fink rebuild glibmm2.4-dev cairomm1 should clean up the remaining references. On the other hand, if /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la still mentions /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la , then you'll want to edit that file as a super-user and change /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la to /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la wherever it occurs, and then use fink rebuild glibmm2.4-dev cairomm1 However, I hope rebuilding libsigc++2 in the manner that I've mentioned will do the job, because the bad path is encoded in the .deb archive for libsigc++2 on your system right now. - -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqzcu0ACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ/icQCcD0vsZm5/N2mbeIi2ayTJwZWX L7IAoKClhwbGYovL6XDYMOWwquQ64N7Z =WHax -END PGP SIGNATURE- Errr, rebuilding didn't do the job, the statement with the fink.build path in it was still in the .la-file. But the manual fixing of the .la-file and the rebuild after that did the trick. Thanks a lot! -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the
Re: [Fink-users] fink on 10.6: 32/64-bit
Benjamin Reed wrote: On 9/18/09 7:30 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Not as of yet. The advanced search item from http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/browse.php hasn't been modified to select for x86_64. fixed: http://pdb.finkproject.org/pdb/browse.php?architecture=x86_64 - -- Benjamin Reed a.k.a. Ranger Rick Fink, KDE, and Mac OS X development Very nice! -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] X11 or emacs problem on fresh install of Snow Leopard
that fixed it - thanks for fixing it so quickly! On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Sébastien Maret sebastien.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Le 18 sept. 09 à 01:24, Martin Costabel a écrit : It turns out that both emacs22 and emacs23 have not yet been adapted to systems that lack xmkmf. They need to use the configure flags --x-includes=/usr/X11R6/include --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib (Maintainer CCed, so this should be fixed very soon) It should be fixed now. Sébastien -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] xmlbeans-2.2.0-1 wont build for me.
On 18/09/2009, at 01:42, Trevor Harmon wrote: On Sep 17, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Adam Skwersky wrote: This package files to build for me. This is due to xmlbeans being compiled with Java 1.4 but depending on libraries that were compiled with Java 1.5. Not sure when or where this breakage occurred, but I fixed it by having xmlbeans compiled with Java 1.5. The new .info is undergoing validation here: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2861155group_id=17203atid=414256 Committed. It should hit the rsync servers in one hour at the longest. Cheers, -- monipol http://finkers.wordpress.com Submitting a Fink bug report? Read this: http://www.finkproject.org/doc/netiquette/index.php http://finkers.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/bug-reports/ -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] gstreamer-dev-0.8.12 build failure
On Sep 18, 2009, at 08:36 , Benjamin Reed wrote: I should be getting my PPC machine back tomorrow, so I can figure out a fix that retains 10.5/10.6 compatibility. Cool! And FWIW, the given maintainer email address [ gstrea...@fink.sourceforge.net ] was considered undeliverable. Using a rusty Amiga 4000T, a shiny PowerMac G5, a homebuilt Ubuntu box Why is brassiere singular and panties plural? -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] matplotlib-py26 install trouble.
(Sorry for the double e-mail, Daniel: I forgot to cc: the list when I replied to you). On 17Sep 2009, at 05:07, Daniel Macks wrote: On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:09:05PM -0400, John K. Parejko wrote: I'm trying to install the new version of matplotlib-py26, but I get the following error about it trying to overwrite files that belong to dateutil: I can't reproduce this on my 10.4/ppc machine with unstable activated (dateutil-py26-1.4-1 matplotlib-py26-0.99.0-1) and with all packages built locally by fink (vs downloaded precompiled .deb). After some digging, I remembered that I'd built a pre-release of matplotlib 0.98.something so that I could use some of the new 0.98.x features. When I did the build, I used the SVN version with python setupegg.py develop to make following SVN changes easier. This sets up some symlinks and references in /site-packages back to the build directory. I removed fink's python2.6 and all *-py26 packages and matplotlib now installs cleanly and seems to work fine. Let this be a warning to those who try to run on the bleeding edge! Thanks for the quick feedback, and sorry about the trouble! John -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] Problem building tclx package
Hi, I think something may be wrong with the tclx package. I get the following error: fink install tclx9 ... Installing ./doc/TclX.n cp .libs/libtclx.8.0.4.dylib /sw/src/fink.build/root-tclx9-8.4.0-2/sw/lib/libtclx.8.4.0.dylib cp: .libs/libtclx.8.0.4.dylib: No such file or directory ### execution of cp failed, exit code 1 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-tclx9-8.4.0-2 (Reading database ... 153184 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-tclx9-8.4.0-2 ... Failed: phase installing: tclx9-8.4.0-2 failed Thanks for any advice you can provide! -- John -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Problem building tclx package
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser hanspe...@snaggledworks.com wrote: John Peterson wrote: Hi, I think something may be wrong with the tclx package. I get the following error: fink install tclx9 ... Installing ./doc/TclX.n cp .libs/libtclx.8.0.4.dylib /sw/src/fink.build/root-tclx9-8.4.0-2/sw/lib/libtclx.8.4.0.dylib cp: .libs/libtclx.8.0.4.dylib: No such file or directory ### execution of cp failed, exit code 1 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-tclx9-8.4.0-2 (Reading database ... 153184 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-tclx9-8.4.0-2 ... Failed: phase installing: tclx9-8.4.0-2 failed See FAQ 6.6: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/comp-general.php?phpLang=en Yes, of course, I'm sorry. Up above I found the following warnings at the link stage cc -dynamiclib -L/sw/lib -o libtclx8.4.dylib tclXbsearch.o tclXchmod.o tclXcmdloop.o tclXdebug.o tclXdup.o tclXfcntl.o tclXfilecmds.o tclXfilescan.o tclXflock.o tclXfstat.o tclXgeneral.o tclXhandles.o tclXinit.o tclXkeylist.o tclXlib.o tclXlist.o tclXmath.o tclXmsgcat.o tclXprocess.o tclXprofile.o tclXselect.o tclXsignal.o tclXstring.o tclXsocket.o tclXutil.o tclXoscmds.o tclXlgets.o tclXunixCmds.o tclXunixDup.o tclXunixId.o tclXunixOS.o tclXunixSock.o -lm -L/sw/lib -ltclstub8.4 ld warning: in tclXbsearch.o, file is not of required architecture ld warning: in tclXchmod.o, file is not of required architecture ld warning: in tclXcmdloop.o, file is not of required architecture ld warning: in tclXdebug.o, file is not of required architecture ... etc. Perhaps this is enough to prevent the library from being built. I'm using Mac OSX 10.5.8 Thanks everyone for your help! -- John -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Problem building tclx package
John Peterson wrote: Hi, I think something may be wrong with the tclx package. I get the following error: fink install tclx9 ... Installing ./doc/TclX.n cp .libs/libtclx.8.0.4.dylib /sw/src/fink.build/root-tclx9-8.4.0-2/sw/lib/libtclx.8.4.0.dylib cp: .libs/libtclx.8.0.4.dylib: No such file or directory ### execution of cp failed, exit code 1 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-tclx9-8.4.0-2 (Reading database ... 153184 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-tclx9-8.4.0-2 ... Failed: phase installing: tclx9-8.4.0-2 failed See FAQ 6.6: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/comp-general.php?phpLang=en Hanspeter -- Hanspeter Niederstrasser hanspeter AT snaggledworks DOT com -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Problem building tclx package
Hi John, I just tried rebuilding tclx9 on 10.5 and it works for me. Perhaps there is something on 10.6? You didn't say which verion of MacOSX you are running. I am short on time till Nov. Perhaps someone on fink-users or the fink IRC channel can help. Sorry, -kurt - Original Message From: John Peterson jwpeter...@gmail.com To: fink-us...@lists.sf.net Cc: goat...@users.sourceforge.net Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 5:23:14 PM Subject: Problem building tclx package Hi, I think something may be wrong with the tclx package. I get the following error: fink install tclx9 ... Installing ./doc/TclX.n cp .libs/libtclx.8.0.4.dylib /sw/src/fink.build/root-tclx9-8.4.0-2/sw/lib/libtclx.8.4.0.dylib cp: .libs/libtclx.8.0.4.dylib: No such file or directory ### execution of cp failed, exit code 1 Removing runtime build-lock... Removing build-lock package... /sw/bin/dpkg-lockwait -r fink-buildlock-tclx9-8.4.0-2 (Reading database ... 153184 files and directories currently installed.) Removing fink-buildlock-tclx9-8.4.0-2 ... Failed: phase installing: tclx9-8.4.0-2 failed Thanks for any advice you can provide! -- John -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] pangomm1.4.1-2.24.0-2 fails to build.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moritz Kaiser wrote: Alexander Hansen schrieb: Moritz Kaiser wrote: Alexander Hansen schrieb: Moritz Kaiser wrote: On my Intelmac (10.4.11) pangomm fails to build and rants about a missing library: ---8-*snip* Making all in extra_defs_gen g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../pango -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include -I/sw/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/sw/lib/glibmm-2.4/include -I/sw/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/sw/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/sw/include/cairo -I/sw/include/pixman-1 -I/sw/include/freetype2 -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/libpng12 -I/sw/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11/include -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include -DX_LOCALE -I/sw/include -Os -pipe -c -o generate_defs_pango.o generate_defs_pango.cc/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -Os -pipe -L/sw/lib/fontconfig2/lib -L/sw/lib -o generate_extra_defs generate_defs_pango.o -L/sw/lib -lglibmm-2.4 -lcairomm-1.0 -lsigc-2.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lintl -lglibmm_generate_extra_defs-2.4 mkdir .libs libtool: link: warning: library `/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' was moved. libtool: link: warning: library `/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' was moved. libtool: link: cannot find the library `/sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' or unhandled argument `/sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la' make[3]: *** [generate_extra_defs] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2### execution of make failed, exit code 2 ---8*snip* I reinstalled libsigc++, I checked if the /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la was in place, it still is. Does anyone have a clue? Regards, Moritz The issue is the reference to /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la That file doesn't exist any more because it's in a directory which was temporarily created. Try the following: find /sw/lib -name *.la | xargs grep -l root-libsigc | xargs dpkg -S | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq` That will rebuild any packages that contain a reference to that nonexistent file. After that run find /sw/lib -name *.la | xargs grep -l root-libsigc and see if anything still shows up. Hi, I did the rebuild over the packagenames that came out of the first search-expression. There were only three. But the second expression revealed: hinz-kunzs-computer:~ takezo$ find /sw/lib -name *.la | xargs grep -l root-libsigc /sw/lib/libcairomm-1.0.la /sw/lib/libgiomm-2.4.la /sw/lib/libglibmm-2.4.la /sw/lib/libglibmm_generate_extra_defs-2.4.la /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la hinz-kunzs-computer:~ takezo$ And the libpangomm didn't build either. Regards and thanks in advance, Moritz Hmm...I just realized that the method I suggested might not work quite properly since the referencing in .la files would depend on the order. Try the following sequence: fink remove libsigc++2 fink rebuild libsigc++2 fink reinstall libsigc++2 to make sure that the version you just built got installed, and look at /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la to see if /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la is still mentioned. If that isn't there anymore, using fink rebuild glibmm2.4-dev cairomm1 should clean up the remaining references. On the other hand, if /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la still mentions /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la , then you'll want to edit that file as a super-user and change /sw/src/fink.build/root-libsigc++2-2.2.4.2-2/sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la to /sw/lib/libsigc-2.0.la wherever it occurs, and then use fink rebuild glibmm2.4-dev cairomm1 However, I hope rebuilding libsigc++2 in the manner that I've mentioned will do the job, because the bad path is encoded in the .deb archive for libsigc++2 on your system right now. Errr, rebuilding didn't do the job, the statement with the fink.build path in it was still in the .la-file. But the manual fixing of the .la-file and the rebuild after that did the trick. Thanks a lot! Interesting. I didn't have that happen on my build. You might want to make a note somewhere in a text file that you'll need to edit the file again if you have to remove and reinstall libsigc++2. - -- Alexander Hansen Fink User Liaison -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkq0IH0ACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ/ofQCgh5OnPjPqzeOmTLNgmi357iuP yiIAoJPPgPUgT1Chkr7RjaqiRztLwebV =Jdgp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer
