[Fink-users] Re: libofx package in the Bermuda triangle?
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: What OS are you running? And what methodology are you using? I was able to install libofx on 10.4 via sudo apt-get install libofx, so it's there and accessible. If you're trying to fink install it, then it might not work, since there's apparently no source description files (which admittedly seems strange). OS: 10.3.9 Methodology: Sorry, I'm not sure I understand...do you mean stable, unstable, or testing? If so, stable (otherwise known as FinkCommander at it's default preferences). I tried 'sudo apt-get install libofx', and received the following: Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: libofx: Depends: libofx-shlibs (= 0.6.6-13) but 0.6.6-14 is to be installed E: Sorry, broken packages I think I understand what is happening here, but I don't know how to best solve it. I presently have libofx-shlibs 0.6.6-14 installed. I don't want to try to uninstall libofx-shlibs, as I have other packages depending on it. Is there a way to downgrade it to -13, does libofx need to be corrected to depend on = 0.6.6-13, or is there are better solution? Thank you again, Steven --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA Security * Process Improvement Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Re: libofx package in the Bermuda triangle?
[ccing the maintainer for additional info] On 8/24/05, Steven Stromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alexander K. Hansen wrote: What OS are you running? And what methodology are you using? I was able to install libofx on 10.4 via sudo apt-get install libofx, so it's there and accessible. If you're trying to fink install it, then it might not work, since there's apparently no source description files (which admittedly seems strange). OS: 10.3.9 Methodology: Sorry, I'm not sure I understand...do you mean stable, unstable, or testing? the latter doesn't exist on FInk. I meant whether you're using a binary or source install. If so, stable (otherwise known as FinkCommander at it's default preferences). I tried 'sudo apt-get install libofx', and received the following: Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: libofx: Depends: libofx-shlibs (= 0.6.6-13) but 0.6.6-14 is to be installed E: Sorry, broken packages I think I understand what is happening here, but I don't know how to best solve it. I presently have libofx-shlibs 0.6.6-14 installed. I don't want to try to uninstall libofx-shlibs, as I have other packages depending on it. Is there a way to downgrade it to -13, does libofx need to be corrected to depend on = 0.6.6-13, or is there are better solution? Thank you again, Steven You can downgrade libofx-shlibs: sudo apt-get install libofx-shlibs=0.6.6-13 I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can coexist)--and you should just install that -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documenter [Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment http://psfcwww2.psfc.mit.edu/ldx/ --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA Security * Process Improvement Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Re: libofx package in the Bermuda triangle?
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: [] I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can coexist)--and you should just install that It seems that someone didn't pay attention there. They obsoleted libofx in the 10.3/stable tree, although gnucash still has a BuildDepends on it. I think it is generally a bad idea to remove package descriptions from stable while the package is still in the bindist. And BTW, libofx1 does not exist in 10.3/stable. -- Martin --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA Security * Process Improvement Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Re: libofx package in the Bermuda triangle?
Martin Costabel wrote: Alexander K. Hansen wrote: [] I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can coexist)--and you should just install that It seems that someone didn't pay attention there. They obsoleted libofx in the 10.3/stable tree, although gnucash still has a BuildDepends on it. I think it is generally a bad idea to remove package descriptions from stable while the package is still in the bindist. And BTW, libofx1 does not exist in 10.3/stable. Hopefully fixed now. I don't have a 10.3 system to check, please let me know if it is still broken. Thanks, Peter --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA Security * Process Improvement Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] Re: libofx package in the Bermuda triangle?
Peter O'Gorman wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: Alexander K. Hansen wrote: [] I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can coexist)--and you should just install that It seems that someone didn't pay attention there. They obsoleted libofx in the 10.3/stable tree, although gnucash still has a BuildDepends on it. I think it is generally a bad idea to remove package descriptions from stable while the package is still in the bindist. And BTW, libofx1 does not exist in 10.3/stable. Hopefully fixed now. I don't have a 10.3 system to check, please let me know if it is still broken. Thanks, Peter Problem remains on 10.3. Neither libofx nor libofx1 are listed by Fink, and an install by apt-get still generates the same error: libofx: Depends: libofx-shlibs (= 0.6.6-13) but 0.6.6-14 is to be installed I don't believe that libofx1 would solve any problems, even if it were available, as the dependencies always seem to be extremely picky about precise naming anyway. Thanks for the help so far. Anything else I can test, please let me know. Steven --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA Security * Process Improvement Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] Re: libofx package in the Bermuda triangle?
On 8/24/05, Steven Stromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: Alexander K. Hansen wrote: [] I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can coexist)--and you should just install that It seems that someone didn't pay attention there. They obsoleted libofx in the 10.3/stable tree, although gnucash still has a BuildDepends on it. I think it is generally a bad idea to remove package descriptions from stable while the package is still in the bindist. And BTW, libofx1 does not exist in 10.3/stable. Hopefully fixed now. I don't have a 10.3 system to check, please let me know if it is still broken. Thanks, Peter Problem remains on 10.3. Neither libofx nor libofx1 are listed by Fink, and an install by apt-get still generates the same error: libofx: Depends: libofx-shlibs (= 0.6.6-13) but 0.6.6-14 is to be installed I don't believe that libofx1 would solve any problems, even if it were available, as the dependencies always seem to be extremely picky about precise naming anyway. Thanks for the help so far. Anything else I can test, please let me know. Steven He added it back to the source tree, not to the binary distribution, and it may take a while for it to show up on the rsync mirrors. Keep checking by running selfupdates. -- Alexander K. Hansen Fink Documenter [Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experiment http://psfcwww2.psfc.mit.edu/ldx/ --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA Security * Process Improvement Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] Re: libofx package in the Bermuda triangle?
Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On 8/24/05, Steven Stromer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter O'Gorman wrote: Martin Costabel wrote: Alexander K. Hansen wrote: [] I would suspect that libofx has been deprecated in favor of libofx1--they replace each other anyway (but the shared libraries can coexist)--and you should just install that It seems that someone didn't pay attention there. They obsoleted libofx in the 10.3/stable tree, although gnucash still has a BuildDepends on it. I think it is generally a bad idea to remove package descriptions from stable while the package is still in the bindist. And BTW, libofx1 does not exist in 10.3/stable. Hopefully fixed now. I don't have a 10.3 system to check, please let me know if it is still broken. Thanks, Peter Problem remains on 10.3. Neither libofx nor libofx1 are listed by Fink, and an install by apt-get still generates the same error: libofx: Depends: libofx-shlibs (= 0.6.6-13) but 0.6.6-14 is to be installed I don't believe that libofx1 would solve any problems, even if it were available, as the dependencies always seem to be extremely picky about precise naming anyway. Thanks for the help so far. Anything else I can test, please let me know. Steven He added it back to the source tree, not to the binary distribution, and it may take a while for it to show up on the rsync mirrors. Keep checking by running selfupdates. Resolved. Thank you all. Amazing support; I hope I can help others like this someday soon. Steven --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA Security * Process Improvement Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
