Re: [Fink-users] failed sdl update for 10.6 (32 bit)
On Sep 27, 2009, at 11:02 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote: Ben Abbott wrote: I attempted to update my sdl, but it failed due to the wrong md5 for sdl.patch ... except that the md5 for the patch is actually in agreement with the sdl.info file. See below. fink update sdl sdl-shlibs snip Failed: PatchFile /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/games/ sdl.patch checksum does not match! Actual: 90f55ead8a95b692916644efaccb831e Expected: 36cec5fe89189ed5ce41e98d66fe6ce0 ben-abbotts-macbook-pro:~ bpabbott$ md5 /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/ finkinfo/games/sdl.patch MD5 (/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/games/sdl.patch) = 90f55ead8a95b692916644efaccb831e ben-abbotts-macbook-pro:~ bpabbott$ cat /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/ finkinfo/games/sdl.info # DISCLAIMER: Max Horn is the sole maintainer of this package. # Please DO NOT MAKE MODIFICATIONS without informing the maintainer. # Preferably, send a patch to me instead of making changes yourself! # If that is not possible due to extra urgency, at least send me a mail. # # Explanation: I am sick and tired of getting back to my packages and # discovering that people have messed with it. I am then forced to # retrace their steps, find out who, when and why did make a certain # change etc. -- i.e. it makes my life as maintainer harder. # Furthermore, as maintainer I am responsible for problems caused by my # packages. But I am not willing to take responsibility for something I # did not do. In particular, for changes that other people introduced # behind my back, no matter how good and noble their intentions were. As # such, I may see myself forced to drop responsibility for (and hence, # maintainership of) the affected package. Package: sdl Version: 1.2.13-svn4819 Revision: 1 BuildDependsOnly: True Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r) BuildDepends: x11-dev, fink (= 0.24.12) Maintainer: Max Horn m...@quendi.de Source: mirror:sourceforge:fink/SDL-svn4819.tar.gz #Source: http://www.libsdl.org/release/SDL-%v.tar.gz Source-MD5: 991f6aed08f12e12960512488f38aa27 PatchFile: %n.patch PatchFile-MD5: 90f55ead8a95b692916644efaccb831e Try a fink index -f to rebuild your package cache. For whatever reason, that may not have gotten updated and fink is still using a prior version of the .info file. Thanks. That worked. Ben -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
[Fink-users] failed sdl update for 10.6 (32 bit)
I attempted to update my sdl, but it failed due to the wrong md5 for sdl.patch ... except that the md5 for the patch is actually in agreement with the sdl.info file. See below. fink update sdl sdl-shlibs snip Failed: PatchFile /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/games/ sdl.patch checksum does not match! Actual: 90f55ead8a95b692916644efaccb831e Expected: 36cec5fe89189ed5ce41e98d66fe6ce0 ben-abbotts-macbook-pro:~ bpabbott$ md5 /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/ finkinfo/games/sdl.patch MD5 (/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/games/sdl.patch) = 90f55ead8a95b692916644efaccb831e ben-abbotts-macbook-pro:~ bpabbott$ cat /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/ finkinfo/games/sdl.info # DISCLAIMER: Max Horn is the sole maintainer of this package. # Please DO NOT MAKE MODIFICATIONS without informing the maintainer. # Preferably, send a patch to me instead of making changes yourself! # If that is not possible due to extra urgency, at least send me a mail. # # Explanation: I am sick and tired of getting back to my packages and # discovering that people have messed with it. I am then forced to # retrace their steps, find out who, when and why did make a certain # change etc. -- i.e. it makes my life as maintainer harder. # Furthermore, as maintainer I am responsible for problems caused by my # packages. But I am not willing to take responsibility for something I # did not do. In particular, for changes that other people introduced # behind my back, no matter how good and noble their intentions were. As # such, I may see myself forced to drop responsibility for (and hence, # maintainership of) the affected package. Package: sdl Version: 1.2.13-svn4819 Revision: 1 BuildDependsOnly: True Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r) BuildDepends: x11-dev, fink (= 0.24.12) Maintainer: Max Horn m...@quendi.de Source: mirror:sourceforge:fink/SDL-svn4819.tar.gz #Source: http://www.libsdl.org/release/SDL-%v.tar.gz Source-MD5: 991f6aed08f12e12960512488f38aa27 PatchFile: %n.patch PatchFile-MD5: 90f55ead8a95b692916644efaccb831e SetCC: gcc-4.0 ConfigureParams: --mandir=%p/share/man CompileScript: ./configure %c; DISTCC_HOSTS='' MAKEFLAGS='-j1' make InstallScript: make install DESTDIR=%d SplitOff: Package: %N-shlibs Replaces: %N (= 1.2.4-1) Files: lib/libSDL-*.dylib Shlibs: %p/lib/libSDL-1.2.0.dylib 12.0.0 %n (= 1.2.13-1) DocFiles: BUGS COPYING CREDITS README README-SDL.txt README.MacOSX TODO DescPackaging: Added DISTCC_HOSTS='' MAKEFLAGS='-j1' to avoid the -fconstant- cfstrings warning when building with distcc (-- rangerr...@fink.sourceforge.net) Worked around a build issue in SDL_x11gl.c on some systems, apparently caused by differences in the OpenGL headers (possibly caused by a newer/older X11 version being presented on affected systems). DocFiles: BUGS COPYING CREDITS README README-SDL.txt README.MacOSX TODO Description: Cross-platform multimedia library Homepage: http://www.libsdl.org License: LGPL -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
Re: [Fink-users] failed sdl update for 10.6 (32 bit)
Ben Abbott wrote: I attempted to update my sdl, but it failed due to the wrong md5 for sdl.patch ... except that the md5 for the patch is actually in agreement with the sdl.info file. See below. fink update sdl sdl-shlibs snip Failed: PatchFile /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/games/ sdl.patch checksum does not match! Actual: 90f55ead8a95b692916644efaccb831e Expected: 36cec5fe89189ed5ce41e98d66fe6ce0 ben-abbotts-macbook-pro:~ bpabbott$ md5 /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/ finkinfo/games/sdl.patch MD5 (/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/games/sdl.patch) = 90f55ead8a95b692916644efaccb831e ben-abbotts-macbook-pro:~ bpabbott$ cat /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/ finkinfo/games/sdl.info # DISCLAIMER: Max Horn is the sole maintainer of this package. # Please DO NOT MAKE MODIFICATIONS without informing the maintainer. # Preferably, send a patch to me instead of making changes yourself! # If that is not possible due to extra urgency, at least send me a mail. # # Explanation: I am sick and tired of getting back to my packages and # discovering that people have messed with it. I am then forced to # retrace their steps, find out who, when and why did make a certain # change etc. -- i.e. it makes my life as maintainer harder. # Furthermore, as maintainer I am responsible for problems caused by my # packages. But I am not willing to take responsibility for something I # did not do. In particular, for changes that other people introduced # behind my back, no matter how good and noble their intentions were. As # such, I may see myself forced to drop responsibility for (and hence, # maintainership of) the affected package. Package: sdl Version: 1.2.13-svn4819 Revision: 1 BuildDependsOnly: True Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r) BuildDepends: x11-dev, fink (= 0.24.12) Maintainer: Max Horn m...@quendi.de Source: mirror:sourceforge:fink/SDL-svn4819.tar.gz #Source: http://www.libsdl.org/release/SDL-%v.tar.gz Source-MD5: 991f6aed08f12e12960512488f38aa27 PatchFile: %n.patch PatchFile-MD5: 90f55ead8a95b692916644efaccb831e Try a fink index -f to rebuild your package cache. For whatever reason, that may not have gotten updated and fink is still using a prior version of the .info file. -- Come build with us! The BlackBerryreg; Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9#45;12, 2009. Register now#33; http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf ___ Fink-users mailing list Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users
