[firebug] Re: Firebug on strike?
Do you have Illuminations installed? There was a big change in FF22 that killed Illuminations, and Firebug with it. We are waiting on Mozilla to approve the update. On Thursday, May 23, 2013 11:38:41 PM UTC-7, Mathias Roth wrote: Since FF 22.0 upgrade last week console doesn't open, neither by right-click nor button use :-( Tried2: de-activate .. re-install .. V alpha 1.12 .. empty FF cache .. restart ... without results please help -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[firebug] Re: Info: Context Menu Displays ALL Possible Items (solved)
Yes, I've seen this before as well. Unfortunately, I reset the options too and so could not debug Firebug to find the problem. -s On Sunday, March 3, 2013 2:24:14 AM UTC-8, Stefan Krüger wrote: I had the problem that in the context menu (on a website / in the tab itself ) all possible items where displayed. i disabled all my addons and the bug was gone. so i enabled them one after one. Firebug cosed the problem. after some searching i found this bug: Context Menu Displays ALL Possible Items https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=823072 and Context menu shows all possible options when activated on HTML pages, and options do not work. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=832022 so i searched for this bug related to firebug but did not finde something. i deinstalled firebug and restarted. installed firebug again and the problem came back. (as the https://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/I_found_a_Firebug_Bug! says :-) ) than i reseted all firebug options (with the firebug menu) restarted and hey - its all normal now ;-) so i just wanted to write it somewhere down so that if someone searches for something similar he finds a option to test out. i have now idea what caused the strange behavior - i normally only use firebug as basic html css tool to try out some changes live... sunny greetings and funny debugging :-) stefan -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[firebug] Re: Bug in Firebug -jQuery drag doesn't release
I have Firebug on a Mac and don't see that issue. What other extensions do you have running? https://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/I_found_a_Firebug_Bug! -s On Monday, February 25, 2013 8:20:00 AM UTC-8, Eric May wrote: I want to report a bug that's driving me nuts in Firebug. Namely when Firebug is active on a Mac computer and you're on a website with jQuery dragging, Firebug doesn't respect the mouseup. e.g. as soon as you start dragging an item, you can never release it. This is absolutely driving me insane! Any work arounds short of deactivating Firebug and refreshing the window would be greatly appreciated. CoKnown.com uses jQuery Drag on every item on every project page so it's easy to reproduce if you have a Mac. Try it out here http://coknown.com/project/1278 Thanks in advance. Eric -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
[firebug] Re: Looking for the file that determines the lines number in the Style Side Panel
What about FireSASS? Can it not be extended to have LESS support? Long term we want to support source maps, which are a universal way of doing things like this for JS, CSS, etc. -steve-- On Monday, October 1, 2012 12:06:10 PM UTC-7, James Carpenter wrote: Thank you very much for pointing me in the right direction. I have spent several days reviewing the code so I can hopefully offer a contribution without mucking up the works. I submitted a pull request with a detailed explanation of what the change does and why it is important as the server side CSS frameworks become more prevalent. I hope that it is strongly considered. If the pull request should be denied, is it even possible to modify the reported css file and line number in the script panel? I was looking through the API, and it appears like I can do a LOT with it, but I am not seeing how I would modify the Style Sidebar Panel, or even how I would know what object structure to start traversing. (Please forgive my lack of understanding of the plugin. While I have been using it for a long time, and I am spending a lot of time with it as of late, I am still VERY new to the inner-workings of Firebug) Thanks again for all your help, James Carpenter On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 1:48:59 PM UTC-4, James Carpenter wrote: Hello All, I am working on a custom mod to firebug that would make it be aware of CSS frameworks like less. (I know there is a plugins for sass, but we are using less) I am trying (unsuccessfully) to locate the file where the css files are parsed, and the line numbers are calculated. I hope to make a custom build of firebug with a minor tweak to make it aware of the debug output from a less css install. I will be posting my work to Github, and will make the code available once I have it up and running. https://github.com/jc4rp3nt3r/firebug Thanks ahead of time for pointing me in the right direction. James Carpenter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug
[firebug] Re: FireBug 1.9.0-a5 Bug Report.
OK, I was able to reproduce the problem, but I don't know how to fix it. What did you do to see it? There is too many reported warning, which (a) slows down the entire browser and (b) takes a lot of memory. Are we storing these in Firebug? I don't see them. We should probably try to fix issue 511, that would reduce number of warnings, but even then the amount of warnings coming from the page could have the same effect. OK, I re-read. So this has to do with javascript.options.strict set to true? I almost think that Firebug should be disabled in such a case. The IMPORTANT message in the console is not a big enough warning I guess. It should say something like WARNING: javascript.options.strict set to true and could cause your browser to lock up. Click here to return to default. I guess I should check well how the built-in HUD works. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug
[firebug] Re: FireBug 1.9.0-a5 Bug Report.
Odd, I can't reproduce it either. I have that page open quite often, with Firebug and Illuminations installed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug
Re: Chromebug entry in Firefox tools menu
I believe it is there as a reminder, though perhaps it should only show if the command line option wasn't used. Please post an issue so it can be tracked: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/entry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: make selectors in Style side panel editable?
Hmm, maybe Kevin can bind the cntl-Z keybinding to FireDiff's undo mechanism? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug 1.7.0
:) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Please, fix the non-displaying long scripts issue
Might you have another extension installed that could be interfering? I have scripts that are larger than 64k and don't have a problem with them truncating. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: CSS3 text-wrap property not working in FireBug
I don't think it is supported. word-wrap is, though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: 1.7Xb2 : should I be seeing navigator.preference is not a function ?
Never heard of it. What are the steps to reproduce? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Dynamically loaded files
Is there an issue # for this? Bugzilla #? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: script tag does not find evaled code
Thanks for getting back. I think John is looking at it, but we might have to wait for the platform group to make a change (thus wait for FF5). If you have not already done so, create an issue on the Firebug issues list: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/entry -steve-- http://www.illuminations-for-developers.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug and CPU load
That is unfortunate. That might mean the DOM mutation handlers, which are known to slow down sites a little, even if not used. If this is the case (or even if it is not), with all panels disabled, that likely means that it is a Firefox issue, not Firebug. So not much we can do about it. :( -s -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: reference to undefined property on 1.7Xa
I wonder if there is some sort of restore state going on? Perhaps the state format for a panel changed between 1.6 and 1.7? -steve- http://www.illuminations-for-developers.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: script tag does not find evaled code
Have you tried with Dojo 1.6? I think they are changing the way they do require/load. -steve-- http://www.illuminations-for-developers.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug and CPU load
And the Script panel? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug and CPU load
Maybe... but other addons manage to register themselves without aforementioned sideeffects (I might mention the GWT dev plugin, Cookiemonster and many more). None of those register with the Mozilla debug service, dom mutation handlers, or console service. You might test battery usage based on having some panels disabled and see if there is a specific panel that causes more CPU usage. -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug 1.7a10
The bigger margin-left is on purpose to put the error number count. Honza: what happens if someone turns off the error count reporting? Do we release that spacing? (Too bad we can overlay the bottom edge instead of the left). Please make two new reports at http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/list?start=0 - size issue - context menu issue (verify that disabling Firebug restores TextMate's menu to normal, it might be their issue) -steve-- http://www.illuminations-for-developers.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug and CPU load
First, I would be sure that this happens in a new profile with no other extensions other than firebug. Second, it may be an issue inside Firefox that happens once we register ourselves, in which case there is nothing we can do. Otherwise, it sounds like an interval is repeatedly running, but I don't know of any like that in Firebug. -steve-- http://www.illuminations-for-developers.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Any way to stop aggregation of inherted methods at each level?
Check the screencast here ( http://www.illuminations-for-developers.com/about/), and at about 18 seconds in there is a brief glimpse of a methods side tab. Is that what you were thinking? -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Test results for Firebug 1.7 + Firefox 4 combo
Couldn't reproduce these issues in a clean profile so it's definitely extensions interfering. Could you iterate through the extensions (turn off half at a time to narrow down) and let us know? -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Test results for Firebug 1.7 + Firefox 4 combo
I think this problem is related to Firefox 4.0 async jsd support which we have not completely dealt with. I believe the function is correct but the UI does not update correctly yet. Because it is async the time for update can come before or after the test harness checks the value. It is also happening on 3.6 with FB 1.7. I agree it is probably a timing issue (but I didn't check the status bar to see, now that I think about it). -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: possible to list/debug/break on events?
Firebug will not debug anything in Firefox 4, events or otherwise. Maybe FF4.0beta10, since they aren't fixing it for beta 9. BTW: You are using Dojo, you can test my Firebug extension Illuminations: http://www.sroussey.com/article/2010/11/13/77048/Quick-Peek-at-Illuminating-Dojo But you have to use FF3.6 if you want to actually debug anything... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug Start Button in Firefox 4
- keep the Firebug icon in the addon bar, but don't show the bar by default In my opinion, the Firebug button must be visible by default. Yes, though I think it should be visible *somewhere* by default. I'm not sure we are doing any favors by forcing a Firefox 3.6 UI onto the Firefox 4.0 UI. - show the toolbar button by default I assume you mean move the button to the top of the browser. I think this could be an option but not the default for 1.7. We have a lot of experience with the activation button in its current location. We know it has several benefits and some draw backs. We have no experience with the button at the top. We have no idea what bad things can happen. For example, what happens when the user installs 3 addons? 16 addons? How about book mark options? Does it work on Linux? Well, Pedro has some experience since this is exactly what is done in Firebug for Chrome. BTW: We could add an option to the menu the button has to move to bottom (which would force open the bottom bar). And visa-versa. Based on user feedback I believe this is not an option: the error count is used by lots of people. If anything I think we should be expanding it to include more information in a compact form. Does FF4 have a native badge system like Chrome? hidden) or replace the Firebug icon by the error count as it was mentioned before (though we'll get in trouble, if a page has a high number of errors, because the button width will change) We can just have a red alert for 99 errors: (!) . 1K! Yikes! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug cannot find _firebugConsole element ?
What version? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Bug when displaying attributes of elements from collection
Partially fixed and partially broken in
http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=3703
On Dec 5, 8:16 am, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
On Dec 4, 5:18 pm, Steven Roussey srous...@gmail.com wrote:
John, I get:
[Exception... Security Manager vetoed action nsresult: 0x80570027
(NS_ERROR_XPC_SECURITY_MANAGER_VETO) location: JS frame ::
chrome://firebug/content/debugger.js :: anonymous :: line 71 data:
no]
These messages are not actually useful. No one understands what causes
them. The line number information is bogus.
In this case the line is a call to jsdIStackframe.eval(). I'm
surprised because I thought this would only be used if the developer
stopped on a breakpoint.
Might be something about the nature of $$?
Or not. I have no idea. We pretty much have to walk through the code
line by line to puzzle out why this does not work.
jjb
-steve--
On Dec 3, 11:20 pm, kirilloid kirilloid...@gmail.com wrote:
New console doesn't display any of attributes from element
Example:http://t4.answers.travian.de/index.php?aid=238#go2answer
// work
$$(.result h2+ul li, .result h2+p+ul li).map(function(elt){return
elt});
// doesn't work
$$(.result h2+ul li, .result h2+p+ul li).map(function(elt){ return
elt.innerHTML });
$$(.result h2+ul li, .result h2+p+ul li).map(function(elt){ return
elt.get(text) });
$$(.result h2+ul li, .result h2+p+ul li).map(function(elt){ return
elt.textContent });
It just returns nothing to console.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Firebug group.
To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Bug when displaying attributes of elements from collection
John, I get:
[Exception... Security Manager vetoed action nsresult: 0x80570027
(NS_ERROR_XPC_SECURITY_MANAGER_VETO) location: JS frame ::
chrome://firebug/content/debugger.js :: anonymous :: line 71 data:
no]
Might be something about the nature of $$?
-steve--
On Dec 3, 11:20 pm, kirilloid kirilloid...@gmail.com wrote:
New console doesn't display any of attributes from element
Example:http://t4.answers.travian.de/index.php?aid=238#go2answer
// work
$$(.result h2+ul li, .result h2+p+ul li).map(function(elt){return
elt});
// doesn't work
$$(.result h2+ul li, .result h2+p+ul li).map(function(elt){ return
elt.innerHTML });
$$(.result h2+ul li, .result h2+p+ul li).map(function(elt){ return
elt.get(text) });
$$(.result h2+ul li, .result h2+p+ul li).map(function(elt){ return
elt.textContent });
It just returns nothing to console.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Firebug group.
To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: How to disable autocompletion in 1.6
It should not stop you from typing what you want to type. We do have reports of other extensions having a conflict that gives this behavior, however. I think there is a show completion list option on the console, so you can turn that off. PS: Try with no other extensions and see it works fine. If it does, add extensions until you find the conflict and write them! -steve-- On Dec 4, 3:29 pm, demongloom dmitry.bakalei...@gmail.com wrote: Excuse me for possible offtopic or dublicate, How I can disable autocompletion or revert it to firebug 1.5 mode. It is too much clever, fb tried to autocomplete when it not needed and moreover it not allow type me what i want to type. Very very annoying. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug 1.6 overriding try/catch
So when you put arguments into the watch panel, it has changed somehow? On Dec 1, 10:02 am, Nak1 nadavgiv...@gmail.com wrote: The arguments passed into using 1.6 into the catch statement are definitely different then the arguments passed into the 1.5 version of Firebug. Nak1 On Dec 1, 9:43 am, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: On Dec 1, 6:45 am, Steve Smith slsmit...@gmail.com wrote: I just installed Firebug 1.6 and it seems to be overriding our try/ catch error handling code. This is basically code that catches the error and does a console.log of the error object. But now instead the console in Firebug is stopping at the error and displaying the error message that links to the line of the error in the script. Is there any way to turn that behavior off so that our error handling code will run? I don't think Firebug knows how to do what you describe. Some things you can try: 1) Firebug Firebug Icon Menu Options Reset all. Does it help? 2) Install Firebug in a new Firefox profile, Does it help? 3) Report a bug,http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/list jjb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Auto-completion problem
I can't reproduce it either. Maybe some other extension is loaded and is interfering? On Dec 1, 8:06 am, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: I was not able to reproduce this problem. jjb On Dec 1, 1:14 am, Vampire g.meye...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone! I have recently installed the new Firebug 1.6 and quickly figured out that the auto-completion (in the Console panel) wasn't so good. In fact, when I try to create a variable, for example, I begin to type: var t; But then, the autocompletion wants to append the name of one of my global variables (here tmr_lotName). So when I validate by pressing ENTER, it's the line vart;tmr_lotName that is executed. And this is NOT what I want to happen... Another bug of the same kind is when I try to create my variable with an assignation, for example: var t = plop; Firebug tries to autocomplete, and gives me the following beautiful line of code: var t=ploptmr_lotName which is totally useless to me... So my question is: has anyone encountered this bug before me, and does anybody know how to fix it?! Thank you in advance ;) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: autocompletion in CSS/Style tab not working since 1.7b5
I created an issue for you: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=3652 -s On Nov 13, 10:03 am, darth-nor...@gmx.de darth-nor...@gmx.de wrote: Just wondering, is there a bug about the missing autocompletion of CSS, yet? Because since 1.7b5 Firebug no longer suggests me any CSS when adding new properties in the CSS/Style tab. Is it just me? Did I miss some kind of option to turn it back on? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug 1.7a6
Note that all the issues I created for the newer version of the commandline should be checked against the 1.6 version if you decide not to backport the 1.7 version. Some were not just tied to the new implementation, but to both. FYI !!! On Nov 12, 7:11 am, Honza (Jan Odvarko) odva...@gmail.com wrote: http://blog.getfirebug.com/2010/11/12/firebug-1-7a6/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: hi can you develop firebug for Firefox 4.0b6
Sorry, I meant what's the ETA for a version of Firebug that will work with FF 4.0b7 - which shipped yesterday. None. The Firefox team is working on things that they broke in b7 and will hopefully fix in b8. They intend to have the various fixes in place before they release Firefox 4 final. The Firebug team is working with them as they decide how to proceed. The JaegerMonkey Javascript engine was a radical change, and it was a higher priority to get it into users' hands and testing it than it was to get debuggers to work with it, which is understandable (even if we developers think otherwise!). There are a few months yet to get things worked out before the Firefox 4.0 final release. If you are a web developer, we recommend you use Firefox 3.6. And by disabling debugging, I suppose the Mozilla/Firefox team supports that recommendation too. We are all looking forward to Firefox 4.0 final!!! -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug and Context Menu integration
There is an issue for this (Firebug Lite extension for Chrome, using context menus), you can star it to track it's progress: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=3579 On Nov 8, 7:37 am, rjgoldsborough rjgoldsboro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all. I came acrosshttp://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/trunk/contextMenus.html and was wondering if there are any plans to integrate this with firebug. It would be very handy to be able to right click and select Firebug just like in Firefox. I would be willing to give it a shot, but I didn't find anywhere to download the current code. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: The return of _FirebugCommandLine init failed
I agree 100% with you. I'm not asking for a fix yet, I'm just trying to find clues and advices to create such a test case. I thought Firebug Tracing would be enough, but unfortunately it is no help here, so I'm back to case 1. Not really. John said that it did attach correctly. So it is not that. It might be something related to document.open stuff (perhaps no matching close or something like that?). And perhaps you should send a console.info() every second in a timer on your page, and you can see just when it stops working. -s -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: The return of _FirebugCommandLine init failed
On Oct 29, 11:26 pm, Nicolas Hatier nicolas.hat...@gmail.com wrote: Steven, I see the same as you. However, this is not the same issue. When you click the Write Document button and the document.open() happens, the URL doesn't change, but it appears to change in Firebug's realm. Firebug is not set to be activated in the new page, but the thing that usually closes Firebug when you navigate to an unmonitored page doesn't seem to trigger. Firebug remains open, but doesn't activate, so any action remains without effect. If, when in the Hello, world page, you reload the page with F5 or the button, you will see Firebug close. You can then open it properly, refresh the page again, and use it. I don't think this has a link with the issue I'm reporting in this thread. Mine is likely a memory/object corruption over time in Firefox (or in Firebug, but I would guess Firefox). Yours is an activation issue, Firebug should either close (or stay open and activate as the URL didn't really change), but not stay in linger between the two states. Nicolas The example page I posted has the problem are removing absolutely everything from the page, including the things that we inject into it. In a sense, it is activated on stuff that is no longer there. We might consider that our injection of stuff not being permanent. Your issue may be something else, but such things are a time sinkhole without a test case. I would focus on the areas that are difficult for firebug to handle -- frames, iframes, and document.open type stuff, and the timing of various operations (it could be a race condition). I know that creating a repeatable test case is 90% of the work though... -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: The return of _FirebugCommandLine init failed
document.open(text/html, replace) Yeah, that will be a problem. Trying this page: http://www.webreference.com/js/tutorial1/write.html Hit the first write document button. The console won't work after that. I bet ad servers do this sort of thing in iframes, so I hope there aren't side effects in that situation or we would have a widespread issue. -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug Metamorphosis
1. Adopting things that all the other competitors have and developers
are requesting. This one is a good example of
that:http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=1811
Just curious, but with the latest Firebug 1.6 or 1.7, what happens if
you use the toString() function set on the function of interest? I
haven't tested it, but try using a myFunc.toString=function(){return
Some name;}.
2. Switching to github, yes it's extra work etc, but it makes
collaboration whole lot easier and a lot of projects gained more
contributors just by doing this. (I guess official mirror and
accepting pull requests will be good start)
I'm an advocate of that idea. But there is a lot of work to:
1. Set things up. Code and Issues, etc. I know you can use svn2git or
similar, and you can copy issues out of Google Code and put them in
GitHub programatically, but it is a lot of work to do *correctly*.
2. Get Firebug devs up to speed on git. I'm only so far as commit/pull/
push. To use it correctly, we would have to learn it really well.
3. Deal with pull requests. Have pull requests automatically trip a
run of all tests with the proposed patch, etc. Of course, there may
not really be many pull requests, but if that is so, then why move in
the first place?
-steve--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Firebug group.
To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: How to limit Javascript console messages to current tab?
Might be: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=1602 http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=555 Question for suan: is Firebug disabled for the other tabs? -steve-- On Feb 7, 11:09 am, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: Firebug tries to separate the messages. Maybe there is a bug in that code. The bug report list is here:http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/list jjb On Feb 6, 7:11 pm, suan yeosuan...@gmail.com wrote: The Firebug console always shows Javascript errors not only from the page I am working on in the current Firefox tab, but from ALL my open tabs. Is there a way to limit Firebug to only show messages for the current tab? Or is creating an exclusive firefox profile my only option? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: v1.5 does not highlight as you search
I created an issue for this: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=2741 On Jan 21, 5:03 pm, JoJo tokyot...@gmail.com wrote: Windows 7 RC, Firefox 3.5.6, newest Firebug v.1.5: Go into HTML tab. Start searching for anything. It jumps to the matches, but it does not highlight them. I am switching back to Firebug 1.4, because this is seriously going to slow down my development. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug 1.5 on 64-bit Linux Builds
They certainly support their Firefox builds, I see updates all the time. You've chosen not to support their builds, for reasons of your own. It would make no sense for me to ask them why you don't support their builds. Firebug supports the builds you download from Mozilla. Ubuntu can ship that version or create their own fork. Firebug relies on users of forked versions to report problems to the people that created them. I'm surprised that after 36 alpha and beta releases of 1.5, that more people didn't push on Ubuntu. It has been in their bug tracker as low priority since last October. -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug 1.5 on 64-bit Linux Builds
For reference: http://groups.google.com/group/firebug/browse_thread/thread/42a683a5ea727f97/05d08a43e85b546f http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542768 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/449744 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510040 http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=2553 http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=2708 On Jan 20, 3:36 pm, Steven Roussey srous...@gmail.com wrote: They certainly support their Firefox builds, I see updates all the time. You've chosen not to support their builds, for reasons of your own. It would make no sense for me to ask them why you don't support their builds. Firebug supports the builds you download from Mozilla. Ubuntu can ship that version or create their own fork. Firebug relies on users of forked versions to report problems to the people that created them. I'm surprised that after 36 alpha and beta releases of 1.5, that more people didn't push on Ubuntu. It has been in their bug tracker as low priority since last October. -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug 1.5.0
Fail! Doesn't work in Ubuntu 9.10 64-bit. I am *not* using an unsupported version of Firefox, it's the version included with the OS provided by Mozilla. Mozilla does not provide a 64bit version of Firefox. John was talking about Mozilla supported versions. Anyone can take the code and make their own versions, fork it, whatever. You can follow Ubuntu's take here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/449744 -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: FBTrace recursion in errorMessage and columnNumber
I think this is an issue I fixed in the last week on the 1.6 branch.
Give that a try.
On Jan 18, 1:40 am, woomla woo...@gmail.com wrote:
FF 3.5.7
FB rev 5725.
FBTrace: ERRORS on.
Expanding an error, the tab 'Properties' shows 'errorMessage' and
'columnNumber' with a '+' sign. When expanding this item, it shows no
fieldnames, but the value is the same as it's parent: getter function
errorMe...){\n [native code]\n}. I've stopped expaning after about
50 times, all results are the same.
No big deal to me, but might be an undocumented feature ;-) So I leave
it to whoever it may concern to do something with it or not, it just
catched my eye.
W.
Example:
When FBTracinghttp://groups.google.com/group/firebug/topics, there is
an error parsing the color value of the css script. This generates 4
lines in the FBTrace output:
errors.observe nsIScriptError...
errors.getErrorContext...
errors.getErrorContext (identical to the line above)
errors.observe, no GirebugContext in chrome://browser/content/browser.xul.
All three first lines have the properties tab with the mentioned
recursion.
And why is the second line duplicated?
Is the 4th line really an error within the function getErrorContext?
Lines 333/334 in errors.js seems to be a duplication of lines 328/329.
Maybe there's something simular that causes lines 2 and 3.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Firebug group.
To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
If you have a problem with the new Firebug 1.5.0 be sure extensions to Firebug are up to date!
If you have a problem with the new Firebug 1.5.0 be sure extensions to Firebug are up to date! I needed to update these that I use to the most current version, for example: FirePHP 0.4.3 FireQuery 0.4.1 FireDiff 1.0b1 -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: What is Show chrome sources?
Found an issue related, putting a link here for reference: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=851 On Jan 10, 1:16 pm, Steven Roussey srous...@gmail.com wrote: If it no longer does anything, then maybe we should indeed get rid of it. ;) It it possible to have tooltips for menu items? I think it could be a great help for some of firebug's options that are turned on or off via menus. Perhaps as soon as 1.5.1. -steve-- On Jan 8, 4:57 pm, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: Looks like it bypasses the script panel filter and allows chrome: files. But I think the chrome files are removed before the filtering now. We should delete this option. There are multiple different kinds of filters because of the byzantine 'jsd' core for Javascript debugging. Each web page has a 'jsContext' but then all of the js is mixed up in the jsd layer. I think it may be because jsd was design before netscape had more than one web page per window. Anyway Firebug tries to sort them out again. I've tried a lot of different schemes. 1.5 is the first version that uses jsdIFilters, I am hoping this improves performance. jjb On Jan 8, 2:58 pm, Steven Roussey srous...@gmail.com wrote: What is Show chrome sources? I don't seem to see any difference with the option on or off. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Memory Leak in Firebug
The only other way I can imagine that Firebug memory would scale with HTML content would be if the window object itself is not being deleted by Firefox because Firebug holds at reference to it somewhere. Is there a way to figure this out? Something like telling the GC to flush itself a couple of times and see how many windows are still around? I happen to see this memory increase thing, and the long pause issue where Firefox will hang for a couple of seconds before I see what I was typing or scrolling starts to work. At that point I know I should restart Firefox. ;) Unfortunately, I can get to this point several times a day, not once every several days. Also, on a tangent, the jetpack project had a module to count memory references (it needed a c++ module to do so), and it was broken out into a separate add-on for Firefox 3.5 (no 3.6 yet): https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/14666 https://wiki.mozilla.org/Labs/Memory_Profiler http://hg.mozilla.org/users/avarma_mozilla.com/memory-profiler/ I'm curious if Firebug or Chromebug could repurpose it for its own needs... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Memory Leak in Firebug
How can we enumerate the windows in any other way than the ones we already use? We don't see any extras... I was wondering if there was a low-level routine that would return all objects subject to GC, then iterate through them all and see how many were windows. There would be no way to use a high level API as it would obviously have marked those windows as gone. But gone and actually garbage collected are different things. I have no idea if there is such a low level API available. -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Memory Leak in Firebug
So we need a test that provides an answer in at most 2 minutes. Otherwise the procedure is not practical. This is not a test to exercise a specific area that would let us know where a bug is, if there is one, but instead a 5 minute test that we might be able to use for our purposes of narrowing down to a specific panel, etc: http://service.futuremark.com/peacekeeper/run.action (5 min) Other benchmark sites might also be of use, though some can take a long time like moz dromaeo at 35minutes. Though in that case, subsets could be done (like DOM only). http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/data/benchmarks/v5/run.html (about 1 min) http://dromaeo.com/?all (35 min) http://dromaeo.com/?dom (2 min) http://dromaeo.com/?jslib (5 min) http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-driver.html (???) -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: What is Show chrome sources?
If it no longer does anything, then maybe we should indeed get rid of it. ;) It it possible to have tooltips for menu items? I think it could be a great help for some of firebug's options that are turned on or off via menus. Perhaps as soon as 1.5.1. -steve-- On Jan 8, 4:57 pm, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: Looks like it bypasses the script panel filter and allows chrome: files. But I think the chrome files are removed before the filtering now. We should delete this option. There are multiple different kinds of filters because of the byzantine 'jsd' core for Javascript debugging. Each web page has a 'jsContext' but then all of the js is mixed up in the jsd layer. I think it may be because jsd was design before netscape had more than one web page per window. Anyway Firebug tries to sort them out again. I've tried a lot of different schemes. 1.5 is the first version that uses jsdIFilters, I am hoping this improves performance. jjb On Jan 8, 2:58 pm, Steven Roussey srous...@gmail.com wrote: What is Show chrome sources? I don't seem to see any difference with the option on or off. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
What is Show chrome sources?
What is Show chrome sources? I don't seem to see any difference with the option on or off. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Easy way to obtain JavaScript statement for selecting a node?
In Firebug, you can click on the element in the HTML tab and then just type $0 in the console. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Save style changes to css file
Have you checked out FireDiff? On Jan 6, 12:28 pm, mnk 3503...@gmail.com wrote: I really love firebug and everyday using it on websites development. I think will be really helpful and save alot of my and other developers time of firebug will save style changes to css file. Maybe add save button to the toolbar? Can anyone help me to add this feature or maybe this feature will be added to the new version of firebug? Thanks advance -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: 'undefined' appended to any and all tags
Sounds like you have the Firequery meant for Firebug 1.5 and are using Firebug 1.4 (in which case you should use firequery 1.3). http://groups.google.com/group/firebug/browse_thread/thread/d4b5c9f8993ce2cc/d28c9af327df15ab http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=2590 -steve-- On Dec 23, 4:56 pm, Dwlamb_001 dwlamb_...@hotmail.com wrote: Good day, I was using Firebug to work on some CSS for a web page utilizing frames. In the HTML section all of the tags have undefined appearing after the tag (eg.: htmlundefinedundefinedundefined). Like this it's not possible to navigate through the HTML, hitting on specific tags. The tag plus undefined appears, replacing information such as class, id, etc. Pointing to a section of the web page, right-clicking and choosing Inspect Element is the only means to navigate through the code on the Firebug window. I've searched through the options to see if there is something checked that could be causing this but to no avail. Anyone else had this bug? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug v1.5X.0b8 - Bugs - Firebug wont start, HTML tab blanks out after postback
That is fixed already for when beta 9 comes out. On Dec 22, 2:27 pm, Jeffr402 j...@vminnovations.com wrote: I was having problems getting Firebug to start up after the update today. Usually I do a Right Click - Inspect Element and the panel pops right up. However, after the b8 update, that was broken. I opened Firebug manually and went to Options - Reset all Firebug Options and it started working again. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: console keystroke shortcut to retrieve previous console input(s)
And in the multi-line console you can try control-z (and control-y) -steve-- On Dec 19, 5:51 pm, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: Up arrow. Only works in the short command line. jjb On Dec 19, 4:50 pm, Mitchell L Model mlmli...@comcast.net wrote: Is there (rather, there must be, but I can't find it) a shortcut key to retrieve the previous input in the console to modify it? Presumably if there is, repeating it would go back in the console history, or maybe there isn't a history. This is such a typical part of any interactive command-line environment that I have to believe it is there someplace -- can someone tell me what the shortcut is, or at least how to edit a config file to get one? Thanks. [OS 10.6, Firefox 3.5] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug 1.5b7
1. its great to double-click on a tag to expand it (in beta6 we had to click on the plus/minus), the thing is, tho, that it takes more time to edit the tag and its content since i have to right-click on the tag - edit html (looks like alt + double-click does the trick but how do I know that?!) Looks like you figured out the alt-double-click to edit. :) It should go on the firebug website, somewhere near keyboard shortcuts. 3. the options of the style tab don't seem to stay permanent once chosen to be active or not. I tried the new :active and :hover ones (which are cool btw) but the next time I open up firebug they are turned off again - :( I would figure the opposite. Hover can only be on one thing, so as soon as your mouse moves, the element with hover is going to change. Then menu options are a way to make a state like that stick while you are firebug so you can mess with your CSS. I don't think the browser lets you have more than one location with hover. Just like active and focus. 4. I tried to edit an attribute in of a HTML tag, what I do (and always did until now) is to click on the attribute (the whole attribute gets selected) and I click once again at the very specific point of that attribute that I want to make changes to. I can't do that anymore, because whenever I try to click a second time, the attribute gets out of focus, which is annoying. That bug is fixed in beta 8 which should show up in an hour or so. -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: what do white spaces mean in firebug
The timeline is in the net panel and currently is only showing network requests. Other things that happen are parsing of the files, layout, painting, running JS, etc. On Dec 8, 4:58 am, Bas Bruijninckx bruijnin...@gmail.com wrote: when examining the performance of a site i see blank areas in the timeline where nothing happens till the DOMContentLoaded event. what is happening then? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: scroll elements into place
Heh... I have made a 'Live Edit' button like you suggest. It is kinda cool. Firefox blows chunks with it on xhtml pages, but I guess I could deactivate it for them. You can do some wacky things with it on this page, for example! -steve-- On Dec 4, 1:56 am, Mike Ratcliffe mich...@ratcliffefamily.org wrote: I never even considered using contenteditable even though I have worked with it a lot ... that would actually be very cool and simple to implement. It would be very, very simple to add a Live Edit button next to our current 'Edit' button on the fbug toolbar to toggle this option on and off. The power of live edit in combination with FireDiff would be amazing. On Dec 4, 8:33 am, Steven Roussey srous...@gmail.com wrote: Or even better still, imagine if you could select a div then drag it into position and copy and paste the css generated by FireBug! Well, try adding this attribute to the body element on a page: contenteditable=true like this: body contenteditable=true ... Make a div's position absolute and then drag and drop it with the little four-arrow thing. Have fun! -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Debugging JS with firebug lite on IE9
You can also use Fiddler2 to inspect traffic for both Firefox and IE. On Dec 3, 7:22 am, bridgetm be.malo...@gmail.com wrote: So, we can't view the POSTS and responses of an AJAX request through Firebug Lite through the Console as we do in regular Firebug? Am I reading that right? That kind of stinks because that's what I use Firebug for ~95% of the time :( On Nov 30, 10:47 am, Mike Ratcliffe mich...@ratcliffefamily.org wrote: UnfortunatelyFirebugLitedoes not allow stepping through JavaScript ... this is a Firefox only feature. If you are using IE8 you can use the Debugging Tools (F12) to do this. - Mike Ratcliffe On Nov 30, 6:18 am, yotam yotam.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, i've recently discoveredFirebugLiteafter years of usingFirebug for FF. However, i cant debug my JS on IE. is that how it is or am i doing something wrong? Thanks, Yotam. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: scroll elements into place
Or even better still, imagine if you could select a div then drag it into position and copy and paste the css generated by FireBug! Well, try adding this attribute to the body element on a page: contenteditable=true like this: body contenteditable=true ... Make a div's position absolute and then drag and drop it with the little four-arrow thing. Have fun! -steve-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug 1.5b4
;) Thanks! On Nov 18, 5:27 pm, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: The Steve Roussey Release is out:http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/11/18/firebug-1-5b4/ jjb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=.
Re: When inspecting in an iframe, you can't see any parent frames
I went through and tested a bunch of versions. It started with 1.5Xa26. So something between Sept 28th and Oct 9th. On Nov 15, 9:01 am, Mike Ratcliffe mich...@ratcliffefamily.org wrote: This only occurs in 1.5 ... it must be related to some change we have made to the HTML tree. On Nov 13, 5:42 pm, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: On Nov 12, 8:55 am, Prefontim prefon...@hotmail.com wrote: WHen i inspect an element in an iframe, Firebug will load the DOM of that iframe in the HTML tab. However, the top element is the html element of that iframe. in past versions of Firebug, you would see the dom of the entire page, so that you could navigate above the iframe and into the parent DOM. Is this a bug or a purposeful regression? We had no plans to make a change like the one you describe. jjb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=.
Re: When inspecting in an iframe, you can't see any parent frames
My guess is r4469's changes to getParentObject, but unfortunately I have must be somewhere else and won't have a change to confirm. Thought I'd try and narrow it down first... -s On Nov 15, 12:22 pm, Steven Roussey srous...@gmail.com wrote: I went through and tested a bunch of versions. It started with 1.5Xa26. So something between Sept 28th and Oct 9th. On Nov 15, 9:01 am, Mike Ratcliffe mich...@ratcliffefamily.org wrote: This only occurs in 1.5 ... it must be related to some change we have made to the HTML tree. On Nov 13, 5:42 pm, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: On Nov 12, 8:55 am, Prefontim prefon...@hotmail.com wrote: WHen i inspect an element in an iframe, Firebug will load the DOM of that iframe in the HTML tab. However, the top element is the html element of that iframe. in past versions of Firebug, you would see the dom of the entire page, so that you could navigate above the iframe and into the parent DOM. Is this a bug or a purposeful regression? We had no plans to make a change like the one you describe. jjb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=.
Re: windows 7 + Firefox 3.5.5 = Cant install Firebug
I have Windows 7 + Firefox 3.5.5 and Firebug installed no problem. What is your anti-virus? Other details?? On Nov 14, 1:54 pm, S. TURKEL stperso...@gmail.com wrote: i cant install firebug with windows 7 any workaround ??? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=.
Re: Google wave won't load with Firebug 1.4.3 or 1.4.5
I'm glad since we don't have wave accounts... well, speaking for myself actually... On Nov 13, 7:14 am, S. Parker suzee.par...@gmail.com wrote: That fixed it. Thanks!! /Robin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=.
Re: Double load happening, it appears
Check your HTML. If you have a blank url somewhere like a stylesheet, image, or css background-image: url(), it will look like the double load issue, even if it is not. Unfortunately, experience taught me this lesson -s On Nov 9, 12:04 pm, JoeK168 joekerns...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, It appears that that the double-load issue is occurring for me. Here are two scenario's that were happening: 1st scenario - upon POSTing a form to a PHP page: - a MySQL insert statement was inserted properly - a blank insert statement was inserted immediately after the initial correct entry After turning FireBug OFF, the second insert statement no longer occurred. 2nd scenario to ensure that the current page being loaded came from an expected source, we set a SESSION variable and hidden variable and then check that the two values are identical on subsequent page loads. The check would fail with FireBug turned on, and worked as expected with FireBug turned off. In both cases, we loaded pages and got expected results in other non- firebug compatible browswers (ie, chrome, etc). Previously, Firebug did not conflict in this way. Would be nice not to have to cycle it ON/ OFF all the time. System info: - Windows Vista - Firefox 3.5.4, then Firefox 3.5.5 - Firebug 1.4.4, then Firebug 1.4.5 Thanks, Joe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=.
Re: Event Listener View for Firebug
Go to http://www.extjs.com/deploy/dev/examples/menu/menus.html When you look at all the event listeners, you will see that they all point to the same function. -s On Oct 30, 1:24 pm, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: On Oct 30, 12:19 pm, EugeneZ eugene@gmail.com wrote: Looks good to me. Heck, if this doesn't make 3.6, it'd make it worth using 3.7a for this. Thanks, great feature. The thing is, my site uses MooTools, which wraps the native event handlers, so ALL of the fxn links in the Event panel go to the mootools event. This appears to also be the case for jQuery and should be the case for any library that uses a generic delegator that is always registered to addEventListener, etc Not sure that there's anything Firebug can or even should do about that, though. It's still quite useful. Are these patterns closures? If you create a small but complete test case and post to the issues list I can use it to see what we can do. jjb On Oct 30, 1:20 pm, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: Please help us build the case for Firefox 3.6 to include support for event listener views in Firebug.The code is now in Firefox 3.7a. We want to get it into Firefox 3.6b2. By trying it and reporting back we reduce the risk and increase the chances of getting this important new feature this year. More info in the blog post.http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/10/30/event-listener-view-for-firebug/ jjb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Dealing with multiple profiles...
For those out there that use multiple profiles and/or various switches when opening Firefox, I found this utility to be useful on Windows 7: http://en.www.ali.dj/jumplist-launcher/ It creates a Win7 jumplist where you can put a bunch of programs. The new version let's you edit parameters directly, rather than having to create shortcuts with the params (I set things up the older, more difficult way before noticing the new version). I use the groups feature to separate the various reasons why I use profiles, so mine looks like this (every time firefox is listed, it has a different profile from the others): Normal - Firefox 3.5 - IE8 - Safari - Chrome - Opera Developer - Firefox 3.5 - Firefox 3.6 alpha - Firefox 3.6 nightly - Firefox 3.7 nightly Chromebug - Firefox 3.5 - Firefox 3.6 alpha - Firefox 3.6 nightly - Firefox 3.7 nightly Just thought this might be of help to some... -steve-- PS: example param for the last one was: -chromebug -P Developer- Chrome-Fx3.7 -no-remote -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Firebug 1.5b1
Have you tried creating a new firefox profile? With the way Firefox installs extensions based on registry keys, you might test a new user profile in windows (though only 50% likely to fix said registry settings). Extension developers do this sometimes to automatically install the extension they are developing into every profile, old and new: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Adding_Extensions_using_the_Windows_Registry Note: the same thing can be done with native code extensions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Chromebug 1.5a4 released
It would be nice if there was a section that said what menu options did. Like the script tag menu's 'show chrome sources', etc. On Oct 12, 10:24 pm, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: Chromebug is Firebug code adapted for use on XUL applications, e.g. Firefox extensions.http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/10/12/chromebug-1-5a4/ jjb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to fire...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.
Re: Something happen to break on error in svn?
How does this work when you want to debug something that happens when the page loads? If I hit the pause and reload the page, the throbbing pause is gone. So how to debug breaking things at the start of the page before I get a chance to race over to the pause button? On Oct 5, 5:02 pm, johnjbarton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: On Oct 5, 4:53 pm, Steven Roussey srous...@gmail.com wrote: Hitting the pause button breaks into timer code though... So it keeps breaking all the time, which isn't so useful (unless you are debugging times or events, etc). The pause button in the console panel? jjb On Oct 2, 8:33 pm, johnjbarton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: On Oct 2, 4:00 pm, Steven Roussey srous...@gmail.com wrote: Something happen to break on error in svn? The option seems to have disappeared.. The short answer: use the pause button || on the Console now. The long version: It just moved to the Console panel. This is part of our overall Break On Anything! for 1.5. Console || == Break on Next Error Errors in the console: break on specific lines with errors. HTML || == Break on Next Mutate Element in the console: break on mutation to specific elements Script || == Break on Next JS statement Source line: break on next execution of this line DOM || == Break on next property update (maybe) DOM panel row: break on property change CSS || == Break on any style change CSS selector: break on selector changed CSS rule: break on rule changed. In addition: all the different kinds of break points will be listed in the Breakpoints side panel; as far as possible they will all support conditional expressions; the new breakpoint notification will report the reason/condition of the break. jjb --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Something happen to break on error in svn?
If you hit pause on the script panel and reload I think it should break on the first JS statement in the page. I just want it to break on error. The menu item would persist across page loads, but I can't figure out how to do that now. That's all. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Something happen to break on error in svn?
Yes. Though only after breaking on something else first. It is interesting to see what is firing in the background, but can drive ya batty after a while. We do our best ;-). And just in time for the Halloween! ;) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Something happen to break on error in svn?
On Oct 5, 5:02 pm, johnjbarton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: The pause button in the console panel? Yes. Though only after breaking on something else first. It is interesting to see what is firing in the background, but can drive ya batty after a while. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Something happen to break on error in svn?
Hitting the pause button breaks into timer code though... So it keeps breaking all the time, which isn't so useful (unless you are debugging times or events, etc). On Oct 2, 8:33 pm, johnjbarton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: On Oct 2, 4:00 pm, Steven Roussey srous...@gmail.com wrote: Something happen to break on error in svn? The option seems to have disappeared.. The short answer: use the pause button || on the Console now. The long version: It just moved to the Console panel. This is part of our overall Break On Anything! for 1.5. Console || == Break on Next Error Errors in the console: break on specific lines with errors. HTML || == Break on Next Mutate Element in the console: break on mutation to specific elements Script || == Break on Next JS statement Source line: break on next execution of this line DOM || == Break on next property update (maybe) DOM panel row: break on property change CSS || == Break on any style change CSS selector: break on selector changed CSS rule: break on rule changed. In addition: all the different kinds of break points will be listed in the Breakpoints side panel; as far as possible they will all support conditional expressions; the new breakpoint notification will report the reason/condition of the break. jjb --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Something happen to break on error in svn?
Something happen to break on error in svn? The option seems to have disappeared.. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Table view ala FirePHP
You mean, like console.dir() and console.xml(), but adding console.table()? On Sep 24, 5:42 pm, disccomp discc...@gmail.com wrote: I think it would be awesome if FireBug could display data as a table like in the FirePHP::table from javascript arrays with headers. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Firebug nonfunctional even with fresh profile
Something did, in fact -- a .NET helper plugin. I suspect it was that, in particular, which was interfering with Firebug. I suspect that plugin and the WPF registry keys were linked, and deleting those registry keys cleared up the conflict. If anything prompts me to reinstall a .NET plugin, and Firebug conks out again, we'll know for sure, but I'm not itching to try it out. I like being able to debug Javascript. So strange. I know MS sent out an updated version via Windows Update a while back that was supposed to fix a few issues. Maybe that was one of them. I've never had a problem --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Firebug nonfunctional even with fresh profile
And make sure you don't install any other extensions on that profile. for example, I see exactly was you describe on Firebug 1.5alpha when I have Fire PHP installed. On Sep 22, 9:07 pm, Alan MacDougall alanmacdoug...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 22, 11:49 pm, johnjbarton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: On Sep 22, 2:28 pm, Alan MacDougall alanmacdoug...@gmail.com wrote: I've installed Firebug 1.4.2 on Firefox 3.5.3 for Windows XP SP3. I see the Firebug icon in the bottom right, but neither double-clicking it nor hitting F12 have any effect. snip I'll just tell you the obvious: the problem is very (extremely) likely on your side. If you think you computer is otherwise in good shape, just reboot then carefully repeat the install-in-new-profile procedure. Otherwise, it's hard to imagine what can be wrong. I was hoping there might be something obvious that I had overlooked, or possibly a known bug with a workaround. It looks like that isn't the case. Thank you very much for your response. I'll try the zip file idea. If I'm able to fix my problem, and the solution was different from your suggestion, I'll post a followup reply. For the record, I think Firebug is beyond awesome! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Resuming debugger: error during debugging loop: TypeError: this.selectedSourceBox is undefined
Todays's svn... looks like scrollToLine in sourceBox.js has a if (this.selectedSourceBox.repObject.href != href). I had purposely put in garbage into a file (e.g. asdfadsf.asdfadsf()) to cause an error. PS: Can tracing ERRORS not trace CSS Errors? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Firebug nonfunctional even with fresh profile
That is a good point. Things like Fiddler install via registry keys, even in new profiles. I'm curious though... after creating a new profile, did nothing else appear in the Add-Ons window besides Firebug? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: DOM events
We are currently working on an Events panel (and/or HTML Events side panel). We'll be ready in Firebug 1.5, but we don't know when Firefox support will ship. jjb Is there support in any prebuilt versions? Like nightlies of 3.6 or 3.7? -steve-- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Unresponsive script - firebug and ckeditor (fckeditor 3.0)
I tried with http://getfirebug.com/releases/firebug/1.5X/firebug-1.5X.0a23.xpi and it worked just fine. On Sep 4, 10:31 am, liam l...@nanothree.net wrote: I'm now running 1.4X.2. I'm still having trouble, im not getting the un-responsive script error but i think that may have something to do with me checking the don't show this message again box on the dialog. Now firefox just hangs and the title bar says not responding but then loads the page after about 2 minutes. Here is a link to my example: http://nanothree.net/dev/main_cms/ Thanks On Sep 3, 2:28 pm, Jan Odvarko odva...@gmail.com wrote: Are you using Firebug 1.4.2 ? Could you make your page online so I can also reproduce the problem? Otherwise, you can try to install Firebug X version with tracing enabled, e.g.http://getfirebug.com/releases/firebug/1.4X/firebug-1.4X.2.xpi Open tracing console (Firebug-Open Firebug Tracing) and try to check options (e.g. ERRORS) to see what's going on. Honza On Sep 3, 1:46 pm,liaml...@nanothree.net wrote: Hello Folks, I've been using firebug for a while with no problems but i have recently been trying to use CKEditor, CKEditor works when firebug is off but I get the following error if firebug is turned on. [quote]A script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding. You can stop the script now, open the script in the debugger, or let the script continue. Script: chrome://firebug/content/lib.js:205 [/quote] I cant even debug the script Firefox just hangs. Has anyone else had this trouble? The problem happens on any page where I include the CKEditor source it doesn't seem to matter whether or not i try to instantiate an actual editor. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Firebug Stopped Working? CSS changes no longer Appear/
If trying a new profile doesn't work, you can also try using the latest alpha 1.5a22. On Aug 31, 12:00 pm, Dyngoe matthel...@gmail.com wrote: Hey All, I've been happily using Firebug for ~1 year now and in the last week it simply stopped working. Margins and padding changes still appear when I make them, but background, outline and other CSS style changes simply don't apply. I've uninstalled and re0installed firebug but still no luck. Any ideas? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: specificity bug in firebug (1.4.2 / ff3.5) or maybe DOM inspector
I'm using the 1.5alpha and don't see anything wrong. You have four
selectors that are shown in order:
firebug.css (line 3)
body[class] h1, body h1 {
color:green;
}
firebug.css (line 13)
body div div h1 {
color:gold;
}
firebug.css (line 8)
body div h1 {
color:red;
}
firebug.css (line 3)
body[class] h1, body h1 {
color:green;
}
Which looks correct. Does Firebug 1.4.2 show it different?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Firebug group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Firebug cannot find _firebugConsole element and document.domain
I see this sometimes too, and I don't do domain changes. But I think that case has to do with calling console.log very early in the page load, before domready, etc. I'm curious if the poster has XHR requests as the page loads. On Aug 27, 4:51 pm, johnjbarton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: Here's a guess. Window.r is from our attempt to complete the console setup. It runs code injected on load. You changed the domain so now our code is cross domain. jjb On Aug 27, 1:08 pm, Steven Parkes smpar...@smparkes.net wrote: I'm seeing various numbers of Firebug cannot find _firebugConsole element messages and wondering about thoughts on it. I see them under FF 3.0.13 and 3.5.2 and FB 1.3.3, 1.4.*, and 1.5X.0a21. The more recent the version, the more frequently I see the issue. When the issue occurs, generally I get Firebug cannot find _firebugConsole for cases where the code is trying to do a console.debug(...). When it works, I get the debugging in the console. When it doesn't work, I get the error message. It works on some (re) loads, not on others. The frequency of failure seems to be higher for newer combinations of FF/FB. The thing that I think it triggering it is having multiple windows with their document domains set (possibly in combination with active XHR requests) when doing a (re)load. The main page sets its document.domain and contains an iframe, the contents of which sets its document.domain to the same value. Here's the console output when doing a reload that fails (this is under3.0.13/1.3.3since it gives more output in the console (not sure which to turn tracing on on in newer versions: Firebug cannot find _firebugConsole element commandLine.evaluate FAILED: Error: Permission denied to set property Window.r [Break on this error] (200 out of range 2) FirebugC...uate,with (line 200) Window localhost:3000 Firebug cannot find _firebugConsole element commandLine.evaluate FAILED: Error: Permission denied to set property Window.r [Break on this error] (200 out of range 2) FirebugC...uate,with (line 200) Window localhost:3000 Firebug cannot find _firebugConsole element commandLine.evaluate FAILED: Error: Permission denied to set property Window.r [Break on this error] (200 out of range 2) FirebugC...uate,with (line 200) Window localhost:3000 Strophe is not defined [Break on this error] Strophe.debug(request id + req.id + strophe251401953 (line 2150) listeninglocalhost:3000 (line 55) creatingxmpp.js?...251402053 (line 44) 1 _connect_cb was called 1 SASL authentication succeeded. 1 no requests during idle cycle, sending blank request Sorry it's ugly, but I think the key issue is the permissions denied part of the message. I think there's some kind of race going on relative to the document domains, but beyond that ... The timing ... well I'm not sure I understand it exactly. The line Strophe is not defined is actually an error being generated because there's a callback on an outstanding XHR request that is trying to access an object that appears to have already been destroyed. I don't think this is related, but ... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Firebug 1.5a22
Great job! So happy to have the CSS and HTML panels working like they should! I'm doing lots of CSS debugging, and it is a clear help. :) On Aug 28, 6:09 pm, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: New release should be up soon:http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/08/28/firebug-1-5a22/ jjb --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Firebug cannot find _firebugConsole element and document.domain
Hmmm, I think I should exit this thread. My experience has nothing to do with frames or document.domain. I used to be able to trigger it with ease, I guess I will try and remember what I was doing back then. Seems like a separate issue. On Aug 28, 10:51 am, johnjbarton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: On Aug 28, 10:39 am, Steven Roussey srous...@gmail.com wrote: I see this sometimes too, and I don't do domain changes. But I think that case has to do with calling console.log very early in the page load, before domready, etc. ... And, I guess, you also have frames? The console injection happens before the first javascript runs on the main page. But we don't really understand all of the frame cases so maybe we miss some. (The current console implementation will be completely replaced in Firebug 1.6). jjb --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Feature Request:Firebug Sidebar
Cool! I want the same thing. Much easier this way on 30 monitors... On Aug 25, 10:58 am, Hernan Rodriguez Colmeiro colme...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 14:39, Jekkamanjekka...@gmail.com wrote: Didn't knew the existance of that extension, thank you very much. Your wellcome :) I remembered it from some old posts by it's author, but it wasn't listed in the extension list on getfirebug.com. I think it was because the extension predates the extension list, but it should be there soon. Hernán --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Firebug from source...
You have to create a _file_ named as it were a folder. So, you end up with the file YourPathToExtensions/fire...@software.joehewitt.com Make sure you are viewing file extensions if you are on Windows and the file doesn't have any. If it's named fire...@software.joehewitt.com.txt it won't work. In: C:\Users\Steve\AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles\FirebugDeveloper \extensions\ is a file called: fire...@software.joehewitt.com Inside that file, as text content (and no .txt ending, I have the option set to show extensions of known types) is: C:\Users\Steve\Documents\Source\firebug\branches\firebug1.5\ Which is where the checkout is. I didn't quite get what you mean about the file being named like a folder... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Firebug from source...
I figured it out. I'm using Windows 7, though it might be the same in Vista. The file: fire...@software.joehewitt.com Needs to be placed in the folder: C:\Users\Steve\AppData\Roaming\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles \FirebugDeveloper\extensions NOT C:\Users\Steve\AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox\Profiles \FirebugDeveloper\extensions Someone should ask Mozilla about that: the when/why/where of those folders Note for completeness: I didn't try the installing of Firebug XPI first, I noticed that John said to delete various files that didn't exist, so I went looking for them, then simply moved the file from the first folder to the second (without deleting any other cache type files). --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Firebug from source...
Yes, though it would be nice to ask the Mozilla people about the folder location so the ant script can be changed to account for it. If I have definitive rules, I can change the ant script for you. On Aug 21, 11:22 am, Hernan Rodriguez Colmeiro colme...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:59, Steven Rousseysrous...@gmail.com wrote: Someone should ask Mozilla about that: the when/why/where of those folders I don't know why they're there, but it's only on windows. In linux I have Firefox in /opt/firefox and settings in ~/.mozilla Pretty simple. Note for completeness: I didn't try the installing of Firebug XPI first, I noticed that John said to delete various files that didn't exist, so I went looking for them, then simply moved the file from the first folder to the second (without deleting any other cache type files). I assume your issue is solved? Hernán --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Firebug from source...
Thanks all, I have my first patch up for review: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=2254 http://fbug.googlecode.com/issues/attachment?aid=-2284623485945196847name=firebug-sroussey-1.patch -steve-- On Aug 21, 11:28 am, Steven Roussey srous...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, though it would be nice to ask the Mozilla people about the folder location so the ant script can be changed to account for it. If I have definitive rules, I can change the ant script for you. On Aug 21, 11:22 am, Hernan Rodriguez Colmeiro colme...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:59, Steven Rousseysrous...@gmail.com wrote: Someone should ask Mozilla about that: the when/why/where of those folders I don't know why they're there, but it's only on windows. In linux I have Firefox in /opt/firefox and settings in ~/.mozilla Pretty simple. Note for completeness: I didn't try the installing of Firebug XPI first, I noticed that John said to delete various files that didn't exist, so I went looking for them, then simply moved the file from the first folder to the second (without deleting any other cache type files). I assume your issue is solved? Hernán --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Firebug from source...
I am trying to edit some things in Firebug itself, but can't get things set up. Using these links for help: http://code.google.com/p/fbug/source/browse/branches/readme.txt https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Setting_up_extension_development_environment When I was finished, I see that the extensions folder gets created with a file that has the path of the firebug1.5 svn folder in it. But firebug doesn't show up in Fx. I set javascript.options.showInConsole=true and extensions.logging.enabled = true but nothing is in the error console. What do I try now? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Give your eval a name with //@ sourceURL
Ah, that's awesome! I'll have to actually use it now that I know how to... On Aug 11, 10:49 pm, johnjbarton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/08/11/give-your-eval-a-name-with-sour... guess the URL got chopped. On Aug 11, 10:46 pm, John J Barton johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote: Ok Steve here is a start...http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/08/11/give-your-eval…with-sourceurl/ jjb --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Can not trust the CSS panel in 1.4/1.5
I've been working on CSS stuff lately, a bit less on JS, and came to the conclusion that the Firebug CSS panel just can't be trusted with any complex CSS stuff. http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=2185 http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=2084 http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=2158 All are regressions from 1.3.4b4 which works correctly. That is, on the same version of Firefox (3.0.12), Firebug 1.3 is correct, Firebug 1.4 and 1.5 is incorrect. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Firebug 1.4 - Can't refresh cache without disabling Firebug
screen's real-estate. Plus, now Firebug hides and immediately reappears whenever I reload a page. This is really annoying, as I don't see why Firebug should have to completely disappear when it knows it's about to reappear. It does not know that. I wonder if there is something Mozilla can do in Firefox 3.6 to help with that... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Firebug group. To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
