Re: [Flightgear-devel] Simplifying the Property Code

[Jim Wilson]

David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

 functions, and object methods.  I think that I'm the only one using
 variable pointers (panel.cxx) static functions (fg_props.cxx), and no

If I'm reading this correctly...I am using them in the autopilot code and the
pilot-offset-not-to-be-confused-with-Jon's-definition-of-pilot-offset code
(GUI/sgVec3Slider.cxx).

Best,

Jim

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Simplifying the Property Code

[Tony Peden]

On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 08:58, David Megginson wrote:
 Jim Wilson writes:
 
   Sounds good, i'll update and take a look.  How about that dial widget code
   GUI/sgVec3Slider.cxx?  Is that going to be problem?
 
 No, I can change that easily enough, if we decide to go ahead with
 these changes.  I think that a much-simplified property manager will
 be a good thing, not necessarily for performance (we're limited mainly
 by the graphic hardware right now) but for maintainability -- I
 provided more options than people actually ended up needing.
 
 Tony's working on adapting the property manager to run standalone in
 JSBSim as well; if I recall correctly, he's tying every to object
 methods, so he will not be affected by any change.

Yes, that's what we're doing right now.  Otherwise, I really don't know
enough about it right now to even speculate whether or not we would be
interested in further capabilities.


 
 
 All the best,
 
 
 David
 
 -- 
 David Megginson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 ___
 Flightgear-devel mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
-- 
Tony Peden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We all know Linux is great ... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds. 
-- attributed to Linus Torvalds

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel