[Flightgear-devel] Re: Re: Google earth mapping for fgfs scenery

2006-05-27 Thread Pigeon
 Then as a separate and non official flight gear project others could 
 write a keystroke script to get google earth or probably easier google 
 maps to display tiles around the area you want to fly and screen capture 
 them and save them to a directory in flightgear along with an 
 appropriate latitude and longitude.


Currently they do not allow any non-web application use the google
map data/images. Not sure about google earth but i imagine similar terms
of use. And I think you can't capture or save the map images data by any
mean for other uses either.


Pigeon.




---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=107521bid=248729dat=121642
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear wiki

2006-05-27 Thread Frederic Bouvier
simon wrote :
 Martin Spott wrote:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 Thoughts / comments ?
 

 I don't want to discourage you, FlightGear needs every helping hand.
 BUT it might be a bit counterproductive if everyone creates their own
 FlightGear wiki. Before starting a new one you probably should have
 contacted the maintainer of the other wiki to discuss how to proceed
 (or are you actually the maintainer of the other wiki ?).

 I thought the idea behind a wiki is to avoid spreading information over
 dozends of sites by enabling everyone to contribute to _one_ wiki that
 covers a certain topic. The whole idea is being foiled if numerous
 wikies are being run in order to 'serve' FlightGear users.

 Regards,
 Martin.
   
 Good thoughts - I agree one wiki will do, I'm just trying to make the
 case for a better wiki than the current one. Judging from the lack of
 response, I'm guessing there aren't many strong (any at all) opinions
 on the matter and this idea may just fall through the cracks.

 Does anyone see advantages to the current seedwiki site that I'm
 overlooking? Does anyone know who is the maintainer of the current wiki?

Seedwiki is an offered service and the FlightGear page was first setup
by David M. as an easy way to gather additional documentation without
the need of a maintainer.

Seedwiki has a near wysiwyg way to edit pages, but the display is
restrained in a narrow strip. I find mediawiki ( or at least your
implementation ) easier to read and certainly to design pages because it
offers the whole screen to edit.

I am just worried I can't find the pages I wrote :
http://www.seedwiki.com/wiki/flight_gear/flightgear_scenery_designer.cfm
http://www.seedwiki.com/wiki/flight_gear/flightgear_launch_control

and their descendant.

Now, few questions :
Is it a complete port ?
Are you planning to maintain the coherency between the two during the
transition ?
Where is it hosted ? What is the perenniality of this hosting ?

BTW: wiki.flightgear.org doesn't work for me.

-Fred

-- 
Frédéric Bouvier
http://frfoto.free.fr Photo gallery - album photo
http://www.fotolia.fr/p/2278  Other photo gallery
http://fgsd.sourceforge.net/  FlightGear Scenery Designer




---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid7521bid$8729dat1642
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear wiki

2006-05-27 Thread Martin Spott
Erik Hofman wrote:
 Martin Spott wrote:
 simon wrote:
 
 Does anyone know who is the maintainer of the current wiki? 
 
 I once tried to get into contact with him but didn't succeed in finding
 any imprint on these pages  :-(
 
 Eh, A Wiki is by nature community based, so there is no owner...

I'm not thinking of an 'owner', but even a Wiki should at least have
someone who cares a bit, a 'maintainer',

Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--


---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=107521bid=248729dat=121642
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Re: Google earth mapping for fgfs scenery

2006-05-27 Thread Paul Surgeon
On Saturday 27 May 2006 09:41, Pigeon wrote:
  Then as a separate and non official flight gear project others could
  write a keystroke script to get google earth or probably easier google
  maps to display tiles around the area you want to fly and screen capture
  them and save them to a directory in flightgear along with an
  appropriate latitude and longitude.

 Currently they do not allow any non-web application use the google
 map data/images. Not sure about google earth but i imagine similar terms
 of use. And I think you can't capture or save the map images data by any
 mean for other uses either.


 Pigeon.


I've had this same discussion before with Silent Wings users who don't seem to 
understand that if you can see something for free on the Internet doesn't 
make it free to use for other purposes.

I'll spare everyone the pain and post the nasty bits of the Google Earth 
license. The same applies to Google Maps - it may only be viewed in a web 
browser. Period.

3. PROPRIETARY RIGHTS

(a) You are only licensing rights to use the Software and the
geographical information available to be viewed using the Software. The 
Software, in whole and in part and all copies thereof, are and will
remain the sole and exclusive property of Google. Further, you do not receive 
any, and Google and/or its licensors (if any) retain all,
ownership rights in the geographic information displayed using the
Software. The geographic information is copyrighted and may not be
copied, even if modified or merged with other data or software. Your use and 
access of the geographical information may be subject to further license 
requirements or obligations. 

As far as I can tell all the NASA World Wind data is released under public 
domain so that would be the best avenue to pursue unless someone wants to 
play with Google and get sued. The vast majority of the data is Landsat 7 
ETM+ data which has a maximum resolution of 14.24 meters/pixel after being 
pan sharpened. Looks good from an altitude of about 3000km (~1ft) or in 
mountaineous areas like the European Alps.

Paul


---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=107521bid=248729dat=121642
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Re: Google earth mapping for fgfs scenery

2006-05-27 Thread GWMobile
The city orthoscopic aerial photo area from nasa are public domain as 
well and much higher res than landsat.



On Sat, 27 May 2006 5:59 am, Paul Surgeon wrote:

On Saturday 27 May 2006 09:41, Pigeon wrote:

  Then as a separate and non official flight gear project others could
  write a keystroke script to get google earth or probably easier 
google
  maps to display tiles around the area you want to fly and screen 
capture

  them and save them to a directory in flightgear along with an
  appropriate latitude and longitude.

 Currently they do not allow any non-web application use the google
 map data/images. Not sure about google earth but i imagine similar 
terms
 of use. And I think you can't capture or save the map images data by 
any

 mean for other uses either.


 Pigeon.



I've had this same discussion before with Silent Wings users who don't 
seem to
understand that if you can see something for free on the Internet 
doesn't

make it free to use for other purposes.

I'll spare everyone the pain and post the nasty bits of the Google 
Earth
license. The same applies to Google Maps - it may only be viewed in a 
web

browser. Period.

3. PROPRIETARY RIGHTS

(a) You are only licensing rights to use the Software and the
geographical information available to be viewed using the Software. The
Software, in whole and in part and all copies thereof, are and will
remain the sole and exclusive property of Google. Further, you do not 
receive

any, and Google and/or its licensors (if any) retain all,
ownership rights in the geographic information displayed using the
Software. The geographic information is copyrighted and may not be
copied, even if modified or merged with other data or software. Your 
use and
access of the geographical information may be subject to further 
license

requirements or obligations.

As far as I can tell all the NASA World Wind data is released under 
public
domain so that would be the best avenue to pursue unless someone wants 
to
play with Google and get sued. The vast majority of the data is Landsat 
7
ETM+ data which has a maximum resolution of 14.24 meters/pixel after 
being
pan sharpened. Looks good from an altitude of about 3000km (~1ft) 
or in

mountaineous areas like the European Alps.

Paul


---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications 
in

the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=107521bid=248729dat=121642
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Bush's family and Saudi partners make higher profits/prices by 
preventing Saddam's huge Iraqi oil reserves from ever being sold. 
They'll Enron the world - George Watson 2001


For Hurricanes
www.globalboiling.com
For solar wind and earthquakes
www.electricquakes.com

Typos caused by two inch mobile phone keyboard


---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=107521bid=248729dat=121642
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Tides in FlightGear?

2006-05-27 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
On Friday 26 May 2006 12:03, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
 You would almost have to redo the scenery in the areas with ocean
 coverage to include the ocean floor elevation, then draw the ocean as a
 seperate layer that can be moved up and down exposing more or less of
 the terrain.

 The trick maybe to find a good sea floor elevation database that is
 reasonably compatible with SRTM, and mesh the two data sets seamlessly.

 Curt.

I like this idea, as it is a more generic approach and could work for steeper 
shorelines (like those around KSFO).  Smaller layers could then be used to 
simulate the effects of waves as well, and based on the camera's distance to 
these layers, we could then play the sounds for wave.

Water surface should be handled differently than land right from the 
beginning.  Right now, any plane could land on the water as if the water is a 
giant runway.  By having the water as a separated mesh, we could finally 
simulate the plane-water interaction properly.  I feel that this method would 
move us into the right direction.

Ampere


---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=107521bid=248729dat=121642
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear wiki

2006-05-27 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
On Friday 26 May 2006 13:57, simon wrote:
 Judging from the lack of response, I'm guessing there aren't many strong
 (any at all) opinions on the matter and this idea may just fall through
 the cracks.
No.  I like it very much.  It is much better and more sane than the current 
one that we are using. :)

 I very much hope that this is added to the flightgear website;
 wiki.flightgear.org is logical and easy to remember whereas currently I
 (despite having added quite a bit of stuff over a fair period of time) have
 to dig around on the FG website to find the link to the wiki every time.

 Good work; the wiki concept is useful and your particular implemetation is
 clean.  All we need is for wiki.flightgear.org to point to it and we'll
 finally be able to point enquirers there without three minutes of digging
 first :-)

 Cheers,

 AJ

Well said!

Ampere


---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=107521bid=248729dat=121642
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear wiki

2006-05-27 Thread Curtis L. Olson
I have no strong opinions on where we host the wiki.  If there is a 
general consensus here, I can add wiki.flightgear.org to point to [tell 
me the IP #] and update the link on the FG documentation page.


Curt.


Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:


On Friday 26 May 2006 13:57, simon wrote:
 


Judging from the lack of response, I'm guessing there aren't many strong
(any at all) opinions on the matter and this idea may just fall through
the cracks.
   

No.  I like it very much.  It is much better and more sane than the current 
one that we are using. :)


 


I very much hope that this is added to the flightgear website;
wiki.flightgear.org is logical and easy to remember whereas currently I
(despite having added quite a bit of stuff over a fair period of time) have
to dig around on the FG website to find the link to the wiki every time.

Good work; the wiki concept is useful and your particular implemetation is
clean.  All we need is for wiki.flightgear.org to point to it and we'll
finally be able to point enquirers there without three minutes of digging
first :-)

Cheers,

AJ
   



Well said!

Ampere


---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=107521bid=248729dat=121642
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
 




--
Curtis Olsonhttp://www.flightgear.org/~curt
HumanFIRST Program  http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
FlightGear Project  http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text:2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d



---
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=107521bid=248729dat=121642
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel