[Flightgear-devel] No panel or object display in latest code
I have FlightGear 2.0.0 installed and working. However, I need the latest code to integrate some changes to be submitted later once everything is tested. When I build the latest pull from Git (SimGear/FlightGear and using the latest fgdata), Everything seems to startup fine except I just have a plane blue screen, maybe sky color, but no panel, no clouds, no textures,etc. Switching views gives me no change. The only thing in the console output that's not there when I run 2.0.0 is the following warning several times: Warning: TangentSpaceGenerator: unknown primitive mode 9 I've updated my .fgfsrc and cleaned out the ~/.fgfs directory and set the plane in SFO. This is on Linux and I'm using the same dependent versions I was using for 2.0.0 including OSG 2.8.3. Is this the problem? Does the latest code require a later version of OSG? If so, can I have 2 different versions of OSG installed at the same time? I need to keep my ability to run and develop older versions of FG as well. -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] No panel or object display in latest code
Thanks to everyone who replied. I'm pretty good at managing different versions of FG on the same machine, but this is the first time I had to deal with a different version of OSG. I compiled OSG 3.0.0 and set it to install the libraries and such to the same prefix I use for the latest FG/SG which is /usr/local/FlightGear-dev. It built successfully and put it's include and lib files in the proper places. I reconfigured SG and FG with the --with-osg= param and set the path to the same I use for --prefix, which is what I listed above. SG and FG built with no problem. When I tried to run FG, it complained it could not find the OSG 3 libs, so I exported LD_LIBRARY_PATH that contained the location where they reside (/usr/local/FlightGear-dev/lib). FlightGear then tries to start, I see the splash screen for a second and get a segmentation fault with no clues in the console. So, I'm curious about Torsten's comment that he's still using OSG 2.8.3 with no problems. Does everybody else concur that should work? I mean I actually had the program running before using 2.8.3, I just didn't have anything usable on the screen :) I'm thinking that if the OSG version most likely isn't the issue, then I should go back to 2.8.3 and attack the problem from there. This is on Ubuntu 10.10, Nvidia GeForce 7300GS, with the Nvidia proprietary drivers. Bruce On 07/03/2011 03:00 PM, Roland Häder wrote: Is FG compatible with OSG3? Hal I have successfully compiled and launched it. So it is compatible. :) Roland -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- *Bruce Hellstrom* Celebrity Computer Consulting br...@celebritycc.com www.celebritycc.com http://www.celebritycc.com -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] No panel or object display in latest code
Ok, I'm up and running on OSG 3.0.0. It seems the segmentation fault was due to me not doing a complete make distclean before trying to reconfigure FG/SG. Now once I got past that, I had the same issue with no display except the sky color. Turns out the issue was with something left over in my .fgfsrc. I'm not sure why it was even there, but this line was present: --prop:/sim/rendering/draw-otw=false That line was causing the problem and as soon as I commented it, everything is back to normal. Wasn't an issue in 2.0.0 or previous versions, but something in the latest code doesn't like it. Thanks everybody, Bruce On 07/03/2011 04:30 PM, Bruce Hellstrom wrote: Thanks to everyone who replied. I'm pretty good at managing different versions of FG on the same machine, but this is the first time I had to deal with a different version of OSG. I compiled OSG 3.0.0 and set it to install the libraries and such to the same prefix I use for the latest FG/SG which is /usr/local/FlightGear-dev. It built successfully and put it's include and lib files in the proper places. I reconfigured SG and FG with the --with-osg= param and set the path to the same I use for --prefix, which is what I listed above. SG and FG built with no problem. When I tried to run FG, it complained it could not find the OSG 3 libs, so I exported LD_LIBRARY_PATH that contained the location where they reside (/usr/local/FlightGear-dev/lib). FlightGear then tries to start, I see the splash screen for a second and get a segmentation fault with no clues in the console. So, I'm curious about Torsten's comment that he's still using OSG 2.8.3 with no problems. Does everybody else concur that should work? I mean I actually had the program running before using 2.8.3, I just didn't have anything usable on the screen :) I'm thinking that if the OSG version most likely isn't the issue, then I should go back to 2.8.3 and attack the problem from there. This is on Ubuntu 10.10, Nvidia GeForce 7300GS, with the Nvidia proprietary drivers. Bruce On 07/03/2011 03:00 PM, Roland Häder wrote: Is FG compatible with OSG3? Hal I have successfully compiled and launched it. So it is compatible. :) Roland -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- *Bruce Hellstrom* Celebrity Computer Consulting br...@celebritycc.com www.celebritycc.com http://www.celebritycc.com -- *Bruce Hellstrom* Celebrity Computer Consulting br...@celebritycc.com www.celebritycc.com http://www.celebritycc.com -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
