Re: [Flightgear-devel] Could We Sync JSBSim for 2.3.0, Please?
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:11 -0600, Ron Jensen wrote: There have been a few bug fixes to JSBSim since this sync, notably: src/FDM/JSBSim/models/flight_control/FGActuator.cpp src/FDM/JSBSim/models/flight_control/FGFCSComponent.cpp src/FDM/JSBSim/models/flight_control/FGFCSComponent.h src/FDM/JSBSim/models/flight_control/FGSwitch.cpp src/FDM/JSBSim/models/propulsion/FGTank.cpp We don't want a whole-sale sync but if these six files were updated, that would be great. Since the addition of the new environment code to JSBSim I've been hesitating to sync again but only copying these files doesn't seem to break anything so it's pushed to git. FGFCSComponent.h and FGSwitch.cpp don't seem to have any updates. Erik -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Could We Sync JSBSim for 2.3.0, Please?
On Friday 01 July 2011 00:30:11 Erik Hofman wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:11 -0600, Ron Jensen wrote: There have been a few bug fixes to JSBSim since this sync, notably: src/FDM/JSBSim/models/flight_control/FGActuator.cpp src/FDM/JSBSim/models/flight_control/FGFCSComponent.cpp src/FDM/JSBSim/models/flight_control/FGFCSComponent.h src/FDM/JSBSim/models/flight_control/FGSwitch.cpp src/FDM/JSBSim/models/propulsion/FGTank.cpp We don't want a whole-sale sync but if these six files were updated, that would be great. Since the addition of the new environment code to JSBSim I've been hesitating to sync again but only copying these files doesn't seem to break anything so it's pushed to git. FGFCSComponent.h and FGSwitch.cpp don't seem to have any updates. Erik You're right, those two fixes went in last time. I missed that, sorry. Thanks for updating these. Ron -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Could We Sync JSBSim for 2.3.0, Please?
On Friday 17 June 2011 01:30:45 Erik Hofman wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 22:23 -0500, Jon S. Berndt wrote: I am very close to committing the new atmosphere code (and the new FGWinds) to JSBSim cvs. However, it would be prudent to first get a glitch or two fixed and then grab that code and put that in FlightGear first, just in case the newer atmosphere and winds code causes problems. Alright, the current state of JSBSim has been pushed to FlightGear GIT. Erik There have been a few bug fixes to JSBSim since this sync, notably: src/FDM/JSBSim/models/flight_control/FGActuator.cpp src/FDM/JSBSim/models/flight_control/FGFCSComponent.cpp src/FDM/JSBSim/models/flight_control/FGFCSComponent.h src/FDM/JSBSim/models/flight_control/FGSwitch.cpp src/FDM/JSBSim/models/propulsion/FGTank.cpp We don't want a whole-sale sync but if these six files were updated, that would be great. Thanks, Ron -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Could We Sync JSBSim for 2.3.0, Please?
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 22:23 -0500, Jon S. Berndt wrote: I am very close to committing the new atmosphere code (and the new FGWinds) to JSBSim cvs. However, it would be prudent to first get a glitch or two fixed and then grab that code and put that in FlightGear first, just in case the newer atmosphere and winds code causes problems. Alright, the current state of JSBSim has been pushed to FlightGear GIT. Erik -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Could We Sync JSBSim for 2.3.0, Please?
There are some valuable features in JSBSim now it would be nice to have in the release. Could someone please sync the latest JSBSim into the flightgear code please? Thanks, Ron -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Could We Sync JSBSim for 2.3.0, Please?
Am 16.06.11 22:09, schrieb Ron Jensen: There are some valuable features in JSBSim now it would be nice to have in the release. Could someone please sync the latest JSBSim into the flightgear code please? Does the new atmosphere code work well with FlightGear's atmosphere? I remember we had some issues when fg and jsbsim were fighting for the correct weather values. But you are right - there are some nice new features we should have in 2.4.0. There will be four weeks starting tomorrow (feature-freeze) before we branch for the release. Plenty of time to fix what might be broken. I think Erik is our sync-master? Torsten -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Could We Sync JSBSim for 2.3.0, Please?
Does the new atmosphere code work well with FlightGear's atmosphere? I remember we had some issues when fg and jsbsim were fighting for the correct weather values. But you are right - there are some nice new features we should have in 2.4.0. There will be four weeks starting tomorrow (feature-freeze) before we branch for the release. Plenty of time to fix what might be broken. I think Erik is our sync-master? Torsten I am very close to committing the new atmosphere code (and the new FGWinds) to JSBSim cvs. However, it would be prudent to first get a glitch or two fixed and then grab that code and put that in FlightGear first, just in case the newer atmosphere and winds code causes problems. Jon -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
