Re: [Flightgear-devel] Google Bug Tracker and Aircrafts
Yeah this was discussed earlier because that list rapidly filled up with old bugs . I agree , missing features , or incomplete feature , or not knowing how an instrument works shouldn't be filed as a bug :) On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Heiko Schulz aeitsch...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi, The Google Bug tracker is a nice instrument for the harcore developers here. But I have some problems with bug tracking there on aircrafts. All our aircrafts are in developement. It is difficult to say an aircraft is completly 100% ready. A lot of bugs often aren't more than just missing features. As an example: someone wrote that the Cessna Citation Bravo's ADF needle isn't working. In the description it sounds a bit different, as it just doesn't shows any NDB's. Does it ever have? To my knowledge not, so it is a missing feature, not a bug. Another example: someone noticed that the 737-300 shows two different cockpit- a 2d one and a 3d one. As it was exactly my intention, to keep the 2d-panel as long the flightdeck is not usuable as like the 2d-panel, and so I noted that in the ReadMe-file. Quote:This is the 737-300 in Progress... The Boeing 737-300 is now under work to be improved and come much closer to realityFor seeing the 3d-cockpit in progress pan the view so the 2d-panel will dissapear I wonder if a bug-tracker makes really sense here- we have more than 130 (?) aircrafts and I know a lot of them which do not have any proper cockpit; fdm; autopilot; systems etc... all bugs? Or just in development? I think aircrafts should be excluded as long they aren't part of the base package. Anyone agree or disgagree? Heiko still in work: http://www.hoerbird.net/galerie.html But already done: http://www.hoerbird.net/reisen.html __ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Google Bug Tracker and Aircrafts
Heiko Schulz wrote: I wonder if a bug-tracker makes really sense here- we have more than 130 (?) aircrafts 130?! There's 300 of them in CVS, so about 350 with the additional hangars! :) Agree with you on all points btw. It might be nice to have an additional bug tracker for aircraft though. Similar to an additional requests tracker, that someone posted on the list some days ago... Cheers, Gijs _ 25GB gratis online harde schijf http://skydrive.live.com-- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Google Bug Tracker and Aircrafts
I don't want to see any feature requests for the code either :) Tim On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Heiko Schulz aeitsch...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi, The Google Bug tracker is a nice instrument for the harcore developers here. But I have some problems with bug tracking there on aircrafts. All our aircrafts are in developement. It is difficult to say an aircraft is completly 100% ready. A lot of bugs often aren't more than just missing features. As an example: someone wrote that the Cessna Citation Bravo's ADF needle isn't working. In the description it sounds a bit different, as it just doesn't shows any NDB's. Does it ever have? To my knowledge not, so it is a missing feature, not a bug. Another example: someone noticed that the 737-300 shows two different cockpit- a 2d one and a 3d one. As it was exactly my intention, to keep the 2d-panel as long the flightdeck is not usuable as like the 2d-panel, and so I noted that in the ReadMe-file. Quote:This is the 737-300 in Progress... The Boeing 737-300 is now under work to be improved and come much closer to realityFor seeing the 3d-cockpit in progress pan the view so the 2d-panel will dissapear I wonder if a bug-tracker makes really sense here- we have more than 130 (?) aircrafts and I know a lot of them which do not have any proper cockpit; fdm; autopilot; systems etc... all bugs? Or just in development? I think aircrafts should be excluded as long they aren't part of the base package. Anyone agree or disgagree? Heiko still in work: http://www.hoerbird.net/galerie.html But already done: http://www.hoerbird.net/reisen.html __ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
