[Flightgear-devel] fgrun future
Hello, I am in the process of internationalizing fgrun. Here is an example screenshot with a french localization : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-i18n.jpg I had to resize the window to make room to longer localized string but now we have a lot of room to add new options that are currently only available in the advanced section. So I would like to start an informal poll on what is the most judicious to put on this page. Thanks for your input. -Fred PS: there is a template file to translate here : http://fgrun.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fgrun/trunk/fgrun/po/fgrun.pot?view=markup If there are wannabe translators here they can start to exercise their skill ;-) The french ( unfinished ) translation can serve as an example : http://fgrun.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fgrun/trunk/fgrun/po/fr.po?view=markup -- Frédéric Bouvier http://frfoto.free.fr Photo gallery - album photo http://www.fotolia.fr/p/2278 Other photo gallery http://fgsd.sourceforge.net/ FlightGear Scenery Designer - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgrun future
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 16:22 +0100, Frederic Bouvier wrote: Hello, I am in the process of internationalizing fgrun. Here is an example screenshot with a french localization : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-i18n.jpg I had to resize the window to make room to longer localized string but now we have a lot of room to add new options that are currently only available in the advanced section. So I would like to start an informal poll on what is the most judicious to put on this page. Thanks for your input. -Fred A checkbox for : --prop:/controls/gear/brake-parking --prop:/sim/traffic-manager/enabled --prop:/sim/current-view/dynamic-view --prop:/sim/sound/atc-chatter and/or perhaps the Avionics properties, nav freqs, com freqs, etc. Thanks, Ron - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgrun future
Ron Jensen wrote: On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 16:22 +0100, Frederic Bouvier wrote: Hello, I am in the process of internationalizing fgrun. Here is an example screenshot with a french localization : http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgrun-i18n.jpg I had to resize the window to make room to longer localized string but now we have a lot of room to add new options that are currently only available in the advanced section. So I would like to start an informal poll on what is the most judicious to put on this page. Thanks for your input. -Fred A checkbox for : --prop:/controls/gear/brake-parking --prop:/sim/traffic-manager/enabled --prop:/sim/current-view/dynamic-view --prop:/sim/sound/atc-chatter and/or perhaps the Avionics properties, nav freqs, com freqs, etc. Thanks, Ron FGCOM :) Alexis - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgrun future
alexis bory a écrit : I had to resize the window to make room to longer localized string but now we have a lot of room to add new options that are currently only available in the advanced section. So I would like to start an informal poll on what is the most judicious to put on this page. Thanks for your input. FGCOM :) Please elaborate. What are the options needed to pass to fgfs ? -Fred -- Frédéric Bouvier http://frfoto.free.fr Photo gallery - album photo http://www.fotolia.fr/p/2278 Other photo gallery http://fgsd.sourceforge.net/ FlightGear Scenery Designer - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgrun future
Frederic Bouvier wrote: alexis bory a écrit : I had to resize the window to make room to longer localized string but now we have a lot of room to add new options that are currently only available in the advanced section. So I would like to start an informal poll on what is the most judicious to put on this page. Thanks for your input. FGCOM :) Please elaborate. What are the options needed to pass to fgfs ? here the option I pass to FlightGear so it can drive fgcom : --generic=socket,out,10,192.168.1.3,16661,udp,fgcom Alexis - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgrun future
On Jan 6, 2008 1:13 PM, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to be a lone voice here Fred, I like it just the way it is :-) My view is we want to keep the main page really really simple. This is what new users are going to see for the first time and we don't want to blow them away with 500 different options. I think we need to fight the urge to put more stuff on the first page (if nothing else maybe take some stuff away) ... but make the options available on the advanced page ... or maybe make some subpages to organize the most used options for each particular category. Regards, Curt. -- Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgrun future
I strongly agree. The first page needs to be clear and simple and without flash and non html garbage. One simple impressive front page thing is an encapsulated youtube or other video that shows great video of flight gear in action. THAT makes people see what the flight sim is all about and it takes no more space than a single still photo and does NOT choke browsers. On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 9:42 pm, Curtis Olson wrote: On Jan 6, 2008 1:13 PM, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to be a lone voice here Fred, I like it just the way it is :-) My view is we want to keep the main page really really simple. This is what new users are going to see for the first time and we don't want to blow them away with 500 different options. I think we need to fight the urge to put more stuff on the first page (if nothing else maybe take some stuff away) ... but make the options available on the advanced page ... or maybe make some subpages to organize the most used options for each particular category. Regards, Curt. -- Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/ [http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/] www.GlobalBoiling.com for daily images about hurricanes, globalwarming and the melting poles. www.ElectricQuakes.com daily solar and earthquake images. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
