Re: Code Quality Metrics
I'm using FindBugs (as Eclipse plug-in) for some time now and it is really good. Not that I can really say yes to 100% of the suggestions. But about 98%. I'm not sure about the benefit of those reports. We've had the Checkstyle report for years now, but I doubt many people look at that often. Having those tools as IDE plug-ins is much more useful. But that needs to be set up by every dev him/herself. On 10.06.2008 10:01:03 Max Berger wrote: Dear Fop-Devs, since this came up, here is a list of tools I use for software quality checking (and all them them can check for generic list types). All of them have Eclipse and maven plugins (and ant tasks, and ) Checkstyle: checkstyle.sf.net (already configured in fop, so nothing needs to be done) Findbugs: findbugs.sf.net (very good - all its advices should be followed) PMD: pmd.sf.net (contains almost too many rules, some of them are debatable) I'd be willing to set up reporting for these 3 tools, so that you can check what they suggest. I usually try to follow of these rules when creating new files. Max Jeremias Maerki
Re: Code Quality Metrics
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm using FindBugs (as Eclipse plug-in) for some time now and it is really good. Not that I can really say yes to 100% of the suggestions. But about 98%. I'm not sure about the benefit of those reports. We've had the Checkstyle report for years now, but I doubt many people look at that often. Having those tools as IDE plug-ins is much more useful. But that needs to be set up by every dev him/herself. As Karen has been inactive for some time now, I can only assume that one of the developers wants a sex change. Who is it? -- Peter B. West http://cv.pbw.id.au/ Folio http://defoe.sourceforge.net/folio/
Re: Code Quality Metrics
;-) I don't make assumptions what sex the people are that work with FOP (committer or not). In Switzerland, it's best practice to include both forms if you address a group of people with unknown composition. On 11.06.2008 09:44:39 Peter B. West wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm using FindBugs (as Eclipse plug-in) for some time now and it is really good. Not that I can really say yes to 100% of the suggestions. But about 98%. I'm not sure about the benefit of those reports. We've had the Checkstyle report for years now, but I doubt many people look at that often. Having those tools as IDE plug-ins is much more useful. But that needs to be set up by every dev him/herself. As Karen has been inactive for some time now, I can only assume that one of the developers wants a sex change. Who is it? -- Peter B. West http://cv.pbw.id.au/ Folio http://defoe.sourceforge.net/folio/ Jeremias Maerki
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45171] PNG files locked until JVM exits
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45171 Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-11 01:29:03 PST --- Sorry for being late to chime in. This bug should already be fixed and will be available in the XML Graphics Commons 1.3.1 bugfix release I'm publishing right at this moment. The release should be downloadable shortly (when the mirrors are synchronized, i.e. within a few hours): http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/xmlgraphics/commons Please reopen the bug should XML Graphics Commons 1.3.1 not solve your problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45171] PNG files locked until JVM exits
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45171 Sean Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #6 from Sean Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-11 07:20:52 PST --- Yes, that appears to have done the trick. Thanks so much! I was stepping through too much code I didn't understand, so good to know I can stop that exercise in futility. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Code Quality Metrics
Well, Glen is the only FOP developer who's actually seen me in person... Although Jeremias has seen my avatar... ;-) Clay On 6/11/08, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ;-) I don't make assumptions what sex the people are that work with FOP (committer or not). In Switzerland, it's best practice to include both forms if you address a group of people with unknown composition. On 11.06.2008 09:44:39 Peter B. West wrote: Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm using FindBugs (as Eclipse plug-in) for some time now and it is really good. Not that I can really say yes to 100% of the suggestions. But about 98%. I'm not sure about the benefit of those reports. We've had the Checkstyle report for years now, but I doubt many people look at that often. Having those tools as IDE plug-ins is much more useful. But that needs to be set up by every dev him/herself. As Karen has been inactive for some time now, I can only assume that one of the developers wants a sex change. Who is it? -- Peter B. West http://cv.pbw.id.au/ Folio http://defoe.sourceforge.net/folio/ Jeremias Maerki -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com Regards, The Web Maestro -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://ourlil.com/ My religion is simple. My religion is kindness. - HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet
