RE: Null Pointer Exception with Footnotes
Hi, After some further tests, this NPE is caused by a fo:footnote within a fo:block-container in absolute position and/or with a specified height. 1/ You should fill in a bug for that. 2/ why do you need a footnote in a fo:block-container in absolute position? Since you control the posistion of its content, I think you shoud use the same thing for the note, and put it in a fo:block-container in absolute position... WDYT? Pascal -Message d'origine- De : Mark Zuneska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 2007-09-28 19:13 À : fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Objet : Re: Null Pointer Exception with Footnotes Actually the table is absolutly positioned near the top of the page and there are several other absolutly positioned block-container elements (with empty blocks currently) on the page as well. This is also the only footnote on the page. I tried adding the space-after attribute to several different elements around the table and that didn't seem to make a difference. On 9/28/07, Iskren Pushkarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mark, I've had similar exceptions regarding PageBreakingAlgorithm.java in specific layout situation, not only in 0.94 but also in 0.93. I can guess your table (the code above footnote) appears near the bottom of the page. Is it right? Do you have some footnotes one after another? When I had 4, 5, 6 footnotes in a group, this always results in PageBreakingAlgorithm exception. As some kind of workaround I suggest you to add some space-after (or space-before) attributes to one or more elements that precede the trouble footnote. Try with different values (10, 20, 40, 50pt..), the idea is to move the footnote(s) to the next page. Regards, Iskren -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 9:28 PM I'm getting a null pointer exception when trying to add a footnote to a specific aspect of my page. I'm using version 0.94 of FOP. I am including the stack trace I receive for the exception. I'm also including a skimmed down version of my fo file. If this does not provide enough context, I can paste in the whole thing. Thanks for any help. Sep 27, 2007 1:59:37 PM org.apache.fop.cli.Main startFOP SEVERE: Exception java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.fop.cli.InputHandler.transformTo (InputHandler.java:168) at org.apache.fop.cli.InputHandler.renderTo(InputHandler.java:115) at org.apache.fop.cli.Main.startFOP(Main.java:166) at org.apache.fop.cli.Main.main(Main.java:197) - java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.PageBreakingAlgorithm.handleFootnotes (PageBreakingAlgorithm.java:248) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.PageBreakingAlgorithm.handleBox (PageBreakingAlgorithm.java:220) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.BreakingAlgorithm.findBreakingPoints (BreakingAlgorithm.java:462) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.BreakingAlgorithm.findBreakingPoints (BreakingAlgorithm.java :403) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.AbstractBreaker.doLayout(AbstractBrea ker.java:338) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.BlockContainerLayoutManager.getNextKn uthElementsAbs olu te(BlockContainerLayoutManager.java :509) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.BlockContainerLayoutManager.getNextKn uthElements (BlockContainerLayoutManager.java:195) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.BlockStackingLayoutManager.getNextKnu thElements (BlockStackingLayoutManager.java :284) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.BlockLayoutManager.getNextKnuthElements (BlockLayoutManager.java:113) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.FlowLayoutManager.getNextKnuthElements (FlowLayoutManager.java:106) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.PageBreaker.getNextKnuthElements (PageBreaker.java:145) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.AbstractBreaker.getNextBlockList (AbstractBreaker.java:551) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.PageBreaker.getNextBlockList(PageBrea ker.java:137) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.AbstractBreaker.doLayout (AbstractBreaker.java:301) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.AbstractBreaker.doLayout(AbstractBrea ker.java:263) at org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.PageSequenceLayoutManager.activateLayout (PageSequenceLayoutManager.java:144) at org.apache.fop.area.AreaTreeHandler.endPageSequence (AreaTreeHandler.java:233) at org.apache.fop.fo.pagination.PageSequence.endOfNode(PageSequen ce.java:145) at
RE: Wrong font for bold
Hi, You can give the same name for all font-triplet. If not, you have to exlpicitely give the font-name of the relevant triplet (using the font-family property), depending if you are using a bold or regular font. In addition, you should specify 2 other triplets if you want to use italic fonts: normal+italic and bold+italic Pascal -Message d'origine- De : Daniel Baptista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 2007-10-02 18:29 À : fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Objet : Re: Wrong font for bold Thanks for the response Adrian, I've set the fontBaseDir property (where it wasn't set before) and the result is the same, there are no complaints from FOP regarding missing fonts in either case. I'll upgrade to 0.94 and see if that yields any better results. Thanks again, Dan. Adrian Cumiskey wrote: Hi Dan, Firstly, you may want to check your font-base/ and/or base/ settings to make sure they refer to an absolute path. I'm trying to go easy here, but if possible I'd strongly recommend that you try and upgrade to using 0.94. 0.20.5 is getting pretty old now and isn't really supported. FOP configuration checks are much stricter and tighter in 0.94 and you should be able to immediately see any problems found with your configuration. Adrian. Daniel Baptista wrote: Hi all, I'm sorry if this question has been asked before but I cant seem to find an answer for it so I thought I'd mail the list. I'm trying to generate a PDF from a DocBook using FOP 0.20.5 however I can't seem to get the any bold text to appear in the correct font. I think I have correctly registered the font with FOP via the userconfig.xml because the non-bold text is in the correct font, I have included the relevant section from the userconfig.xml below. fonts font metrics-file=FrutigerLTStd-Bold.ttf.xml kerning=yes embed-file=FrutigerLTStd-Bold.ttf font-triplet name=FrutigerLTStd-Light_Norm_Bold style=normal weight=bold/ /font font metrics-file=FrutigerLTStd-Light-vox.ttf.xml kerning=yes embed-file=FrutigerLTStd-Light-vox.ttf font-triplet name=FrutigerLTStd-Light-vox_Norm_Norm style=normal weight=normal/ /font /fonts Can anyone see what I've done incorrectly? (Go easy on me I'm new to this :) ) Thanks in advance, Dan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Null Pointer Exception with Footnotes
Hi, Pascal Sancho a écrit : Hi, After some further tests, this NPE is caused by a fo:footnote within a fo:block-container in absolute position and/or with a specified height. 1/ You should fill in a bug for that. 2/ why do you need a footnote in a fo:block-container in absolute position? Since you control the posistion of its content, I think you shoud use the same thing for the note, and put it in a fo:block-container in absolute position... Moreover, a footnote is not allowed to appear in an absolutely-positioned block-container. See XSL-FO 1.1, section 6.12.3. That said, that’s not a reason why FOP should throw a NPE, so please still file a bug report. Thanks, Vincent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wrong font for bold
Thanks Pascal, this solves my problem. Dan. Pascal Sancho wrote: Hi, You can give the same name for all font-triplet. If not, you have to exlpicitely give the font-name of the relevant triplet (using the font-family property), depending if you are using a bold or regular font. In addition, you should specify 2 other triplets if you want to use italic fonts: normal+italic and bold+italic Pascal -Message d'origine- De : Daniel Baptista [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 2007-10-02 18:29 À : fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Objet : Re: Wrong font for bold Thanks for the response Adrian, I've set the fontBaseDir property (where it wasn't set before) and the result is the same, there are no complaints from FOP regarding missing fonts in either case. I'll upgrade to 0.94 and see if that yields any better results. Thanks again, Dan. Adrian Cumiskey wrote: Hi Dan, Firstly, you may want to check your font-base/ and/or base/ settings to make sure they refer to an absolute path. I'm trying to go easy here, but if possible I'd strongly recommend that you try and upgrade to using 0.94. 0.20.5 is getting pretty old now and isn't really supported. FOP configuration checks are much stricter and tighter in 0.94 and you should be able to immediately see any problems found with your configuration. Adrian. Daniel Baptista wrote: Hi all, I'm sorry if this question has been asked before but I cant seem to find an answer for it so I thought I'd mail the list. I'm trying to generate a PDF from a DocBook using FOP 0.20.5 however I can't seem to get the any bold text to appear in the correct font. I think I have correctly registered the font with FOP via the userconfig.xml because the non-bold text is in the correct font, I have included the relevant section from the userconfig.xml below. fonts font metrics-file=FrutigerLTStd-Bold.ttf.xml kerning=yes embed-file=FrutigerLTStd-Bold.ttf font-triplet name=FrutigerLTStd-Light_Norm_Bold style=normal weight=bold/ /font font metrics-file=FrutigerLTStd-Light-vox.ttf.xml kerning=yes embed-file=FrutigerLTStd-Light-vox.ttf font-triplet name=FrutigerLTStd-Light-vox_Norm_Norm style=normal weight=normal/ /font /fonts Can anyone see what I've done incorrectly? (Go easy on me I'm new to this :) ) Thanks in advance, Dan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- *VoxSurf Limited* Registered principal office: 2nd Floor Elme House 133 Long Acre London WC2E 9DT United Kingdom Company No (England): 4051448 http://www.voxsurf.com/ Email disclaimer: This can be viewed at http://www.voxsurf.com/disclaimer.html
RE: Null Pointer Exception with Footnotes
-Message d'origine- De : Vincent Hennebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 2007-10-03 10:08 Moreover, a footnote is not allowed to appear in an absolutely-positioned block-container. See XSL-FO 1.1, section 6.12.3. I've looked for this small line, but not found it... Thx;) Pascal
Re: 0.93/0.94 and tables
On Oct 3, 2007, at 03:53, Steve Ebersole wrote: [Me:] Well, in the meantime, I did end up copy/pasting the entire configuration.xml into the location of the xi:include node, fiddled some more, and I see the problem now. Starting from Table 1.3 onward, correct? Correct OK, managed to trim it down. For the interested parties, the FO in attach reproduces the issue. It's caused by the keep-together on the table's containing block. Remove that property and the table gets rendered very nicely. Would look even slightly better with a keep-together on the rows, I think. test.fo Description: Binary data Cheers Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 0.93/0.94 and tables
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 02:47:04 pm Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Oct 3, 2007, at 03:53, Steve Ebersole wrote: [Me:] Well, in the meantime, I did end up copy/pasting the entire configuration.xml into the location of the xi:include node, fiddled some more, and I see the problem now. Starting from Table 1.3 onward, correct? Correct OK, managed to trim it down. For the interested parties, the FO in attach reproduces the issue. It's caused by the keep-together on the table's containing block. Remove that property and the table gets rendered very nicely. Would look even slightly better with a keep-together on the rows, I think. Awesome! Thank you so much. I know you are not trying to, but at some point you switched to speaking a language I do not understand ;) But I did a search. Is something this what you mean? http://sourceware.org/ml/docbook-apps/2004-q1/msg00232.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 0.93/0.94 and tables
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 02:47:04 pm Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Oct 3, 2007, at 03:53, Steve Ebersole wrote: [Me:] Well, in the meantime, I did end up copy/pasting the entire configuration.xml into the location of the xi:include node, fiddled some more, and I see the problem now. Starting from Table 1.3 onward, correct? Correct OK, managed to trim it down. For the interested parties, the FO in attach reproduces the issue. It's caused by the keep-together on the table's containing block. Remove that property and the table gets rendered very nicely. Would look even slightly better with a keep-together on the rows, I think. Also, I do not set the keep-together on the table's containing block (I don't think so anyway), so how would I remove it? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 0.93/0.94 and tables
On Oct 3, 2007, at 21:53, Steve Ebersole wrote: snip / I know you are not trying to, but at some point you switched to speaking a language I do not understand ;) But I did a search. Good thinking. :-) Is something this what you mean? http://sourceware.org/ml/docbook-apps/2004-q1/msg00232.html Indeed. That should work fine here. Cheers Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
