Migrating FOP and XSL FO to 1.1
Hi, I'm new to xsl . Currently we are using XSL-FO 1.0 and FOP 0.93. we planned to migrate xsl and fop to latest 1.1 version. Please let me know that,what are the things should I consider while migrating XSL FO and FOP. Is performance improved in fop 1.1? Thanks in Advance. Please guide me. -- View this message in context: http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/Migrating-FOP-and-XSL-FO-to-1-1-tp40792.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: Migrating FOP and XSL FO to 1.1
Hi, FOP 0.93 is quite old (released on 9 January 2007), so many improvments, bugfixes, new features, etc. were added since that version (see [1]). performance is not ommited: - less memory consuption - faster - producing smaller files - etc. To upgrade, read 1st the uprgrading page at [2]. You may pay attention on - font management (metrics files are deprecated, and many heavy other improvments were made on this area) - uri resolution (more consistant now), used in links, external images, etc. - images (deep improvments on this area, resizing, colors, ...) - complex scripts (not all fonts support this feature) - etc. [1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/changes.html [2] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/1.1/upgrading.html 2014-06-17 9:52 GMT+02:00 Vijaya Raghavan.R vijayaraghava...@solartis.net: Hi, I'm new to xsl . Currently we are using XSL-FO 1.0 and FOP 0.93. we planned to migrate xsl and fop to latest 1.1 version. Please let me know that,what are the things should I consider while migrating XSL FO and FOP. Is performance improved in fop 1.1? Thanks in Advance. Please guide me. -- View this message in context: http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/Migrating-FOP-and-XSL-FO-to-1-1-tp40792.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org -- pascal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [PDF Renderer] Why FOP scales down 300 dpi images and not maintain the intrinsic image dimension?
Hello, Is that what you were trying to achieve? No. I want to leave the image as it is and prevent FOP from scaling up or down. Using this: fo:external-graphic src=300dpi.jpg width=1919px height=1272px content-width=scale-to-fit content-height=scale-to-fit/ FOP implicitly assumes that the image's DPI is 72, so when calculating the mpt size we get (1919000, 1272000), and the image is rendered with no scaling applied. My question is: Is there any way to override the image's DPI in FOP using the config? Thanks Seifeddine
Re: [PDF Renderer] Why FOP scales down 300 dpi images and not maintain the intrinsic image dimension?
FOP does not implicitly assume that the pixel size is 72 dpi. FOP uses the pixel size (resolution) specified in the image. Since you are using JPEG and the resolution may be specified in the EXIF segment make sure you use trunk, not 1.1. If the image has no resolution (or the resolution is in the EXIF segment and you are using 1.1) then FOP defaults to 72dpi. You can change that specifying a different value in the source-resolution / element in the conf file. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Dridi Seifeddine sdr...@iptech-group.com wrote: Hello, Is that what you were trying to achieve? No. I want to leave the image as it is and prevent FOP from scaling up or down. Using this: fo:external-graphic src=300dpi.jpg width=”1919px” height=”1272px” content-width=scale-to-fit content-height=scale-to-fit/ FOP implicitly assumes that the image’s DPI is 72, so when calculating the mpt size we get (1919000, 1272000), and the image is rendered with no scaling applied. My question is: Is there any way to override the image’s DPI in FOP using the config? Thanks Seifeddine
Re: [PDF Renderer] Why FOP scales down 300 dpi images and not maintain the intrinsic image dimension?
Hi, px unit defaults to 1/72 in, but you can specify other size: either in conf file with source-resolution, or in logic with fopFactory.setSourceResolution() Note that px is device dependant. You should use absolute unit instead. 2014-06-17 10:46 GMT+02:00 Dridi Seifeddine sdr...@iptech-group.com: Hello, Is that what you were trying to achieve? No. I want to leave the image as it is and prevent FOP from scaling up or down. Using this: fo:external-graphic src=300dpi.jpg width=”1919px” height=”1272px” content-width=scale-to-fit content-height=scale-to-fit/ FOP implicitly assumes that the image’s DPI is 72, so when calculating the mpt size we get (1919000, 1272000), and the image is rendered with no scaling applied. My question is: Is there any way to override the image’s DPI in FOP using the config? Thanks Seifeddine -- pascal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: [PDF Renderer] Why FOP scales down 300 dpi images and not maintain the intrinsic image dimension?
On 17/06/14 10:46, Dridi Seifeddine wrote: Hello, Is that what you were trying to achieve? No. I want to leave the image as it is and prevent FOP from scaling up or down. Using this: fo:external-graphic src=300dpi.jpg width=1919px height=1272px content-width=scale-to-fit content-height=scale-to-fit/ If you want the image to appear at its natural size (16.3x10.8cm in the present case) then you should leave width/height and content-width/height unspecified: fo:external-graphic src=300dpi.jpg/ FOP will extract the image’s DPI and calculate its size in mpt accordingly. FOP implicitly assumes that the image's DPI is 72, so when calculating No it doesn’t. It assumes that the px unit you used in the width and height properties above resolves to 72px per inch. This has nothing to do with the image’s resolution. the mpt size we get (1919000, 1272000), and the image is rendered with no scaling applied. I’m not sure I understand what you mean. If you use fo:external-graphic in the way you show above, FOP effectively scales up the image by around 416% of its natural size. My question is: Is there any way to override the image's DPI in FOP using the config? If you want to override the image’s 300DPI resolution, then you just set content-width/height to scale-to-fit and width/height to any dimension you like. But I suspect that’s not what you’re asking for. If you want to honour the image’s resoltion of 300DPI, then you should leave width/height and content-width/height unspecified like explained above. Thanks Seifeddine HTH, Vincent - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
