Re: FOP and Avalon
There has been no discussion that I'm aware of. You are welcome to submit a patch making the necessary changes. On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:36 PM, jdebinderwrote: > The last question on this topic was back in 2007. I also see a couple of > more recent posts about the Maven link to Avalon 4.3.1. I have to repeat > the question about removing the dependency on Avalon. As now even the > Excalibur project has also been retired as of 2010. I work on a product > for > IBM and due to security risks we are required to remove all frameworks that > are no longer supported. Since FOP depends on Avalon we will also have to > remove our dependency on FOP and try to find something to replace it. > > Is there any more thought to removing the dependency on the Avalon > framework? > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-fop.1065347.n5. > nabble.com/FOP-and-Avalon-tp44302.html > Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org > >
Re: Resolve an URI relative to base missing on Windows
Hi, After some tests and try to embed FOP by another way, the result are: 1. If i apply the "Basic usage pattern", than base setting by config file not working on windows. FopFactory fopFactory = FopFactory.newInstance(new File("C:/Temp/fop.xconf")); 2. If i embed fop, as in the "Using the Configuration File" documentation, and put the baseURI by parameter to FopFactoryBuilder, it works also on windows. DefaultConfigurationBuilder cfgBuilder = new DefaultConfigurationBuilder(); Configuration cfg = cfgBuilder.buildFromFile(new File("C:/Temp/mycfg.xml")); fopFactoryBuilder = new FopFactoryBuilder(baseURI).setConfiguration(cfg); So my concrete problem solved, but using fop by any other way the problem occurs. Szeak 2016-08-08 15:15 keltezéssel, Szeak (Register Man) írta: Hi, I'm using FOP 2.1. With the same simple fo file which is including an external image (jpg), with sam config file, and same fop, URI resolving to the image is OK on Linux, but generates the below Error on Windows: Image not found. URI: images/logo.jpg. (See position 11:67) If i use url('...') format in src attribute and take the full path, it works and includes the image, but relative path is not working. The problem is not related to using FOP from the command line or embedded mode. You can test from command line easy. The problem is not related to used output format. (I used PDF and PS) I have read some problem with URI resolving with the new FOP versions (from 2.0), but i think that is a new problem. Please, somebody test this again or i'm waiting for any new info or mistake with my files or configuration. I attached my FO and Config to this mail. Thanks for any help. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
FOP and Avalon
The last question on this topic was back in 2007. I also see a couple of more recent posts about the Maven link to Avalon 4.3.1. I have to repeat the question about removing the dependency on Avalon. As now even the Excalibur project has also been retired as of 2010. I work on a product for IBM and due to security risks we are required to remove all frameworks that are no longer supported. Since FOP depends on Avalon we will also have to remove our dependency on FOP and try to find something to replace it. Is there any more thought to removing the dependency on the Avalon framework? -- View this message in context: http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/FOP-and-Avalon-tp44302.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org